You are on page 1of 42

,

&

.-

, &

.-
..., ... ...
5
,

...
,

.

.-,
, ,
2011.
.-, LOW TECH ,
;,
, - 2012.
.-, ,
, ,
2014.

: .

www.preservationnation.org
.

:
www.ntua.gr/vitruvius/
2015
(4)


, 2015.

12

....................... 35
12.1 - ........................ 35
12.2 ............................ 36
12.3 ................................... 37
12.4 .............................. 37
12.5
............................................................. 38
13
....................................... 40
14
...................................... 41

1
........................................... 5
2
.................................. 5
3
.................................. 6
4

..................................................... 7
5
............................. 7
6
....................... 9
7
. ,
................................................11
8
............................................14
9
..........................................17
10
:
.....................................18
10.1 ....................18
10.2
....................................................................23
10.3 ..................23
10.4
..........................................25
10.5
....................................................................27
10.6
28
11
.....................................30
11.1
............................................30
11.2 Low-Tech .......31

5.1:
....................................... 8
6.1:
.......................... 9
6.2: . ............... 10
7.1: . ................... 11
7.2: . ,
................... 13
7.3:
....................... 13
10.1:
............................................... 18
10.2:
. ............................................. 19

10.3: -

........................................
10.4: -

......................................
10.5: . ................
10.6: -


........................................
10.7:


........
10.8:

(
). .................................................
10.9:


. ...............
10.10:
GJ/m2
(,
) ...........................................
11.1:

..................................................

3
20

10.1:
............................... 24
10.2:
...................................................... 24
10.3:

1,201,20m ..................... 24
12.1:
................................. 38
12.2:
... 40

21
21

22

26

26

26

27

32


.



.

,

.


.
,

,
.


.


,
.


:



.

,
,

.


( )

.

,
,

-
.

, D. Cander
,

1/3


.

, '


.

,
()

.


() ,

,
.. ,

,
. .

,

.
5.1:


,
, .. .

. ,

.



: ,
.
: ,
,
.

, ,

6.1:

, ,
,
. ,


. ,

,

,


.



,
.
,

,
,


()
:

6.2: .


,


,

,

10


(

)


CO2 Ox
.

),


.

7 .
,


:
,
,

.

7.1: .


.


. ()


(




.
,

11


,
.

,

, :

,

.



(second-hand aggregate).


95%
(.
)
.

,



.


.


()

(

)

( ...)

12

:
-.

:
(,
)


,


.
,





.

7.3:

,

,

7.2: . ,

13


.
,


(VOCs) .



.




.
,
,
,
.





.
" ".

37%
(
) 2% .



. 8%

,

67/548/
.



.




.

14

( )
.

, ,
,
,

( ..).


(
, ,
,
)


(

)

(

).

,
,

(
)
,
,
.

(


)


(PCB)
, ,
.

,


.

, ,
,
,
.



(

).

15



.
,
,
.



.


.
,
,

,

(
)

.

,

,



(, ,
).



.




(DIN 38414, TCLP Toxicity Characteristic
Leaching Procedure) ..


, ,
.



(
)
.


,

.

16


,


.




.

.
,

,
35%
.

.


,

.

,

.. , -

.



.

,
(, ,
, .)
.




,

.

17



,

()
CO2 .

10

10.1


,
,
, ,
.

.

, ,

.

10.1:

H


,
, ,
,

-- .




,
,

.

18


,
'
.
, ,

.



(cradle-to-gate)
.

:
1.

,
2.
--
, ,
, .

,



:

10.2: .
,
,
,

19


,

( )
..
.


,
.


.

.


,
.



,

.

10.3: -

20

10.5: .

---
,

.



.


( )

10.4: -

21

. ,
.

,

.



( )
.



,

. ,


.
-


-.
, ,
.
(
),


10.6: -

22

10.2

,
/

.






(.. University of
Bath Embodied Energy & Carbon Material
Inventory).

10.3


MJ/kgr
(megaJoules
) (. ).



,
.


SBTool
UK Code for Sustainable Homes LEED
U.S. Green Building Council


.



,
()

( )
(
).





.
,


23


()

(30 Mpa)


()
()
(3)

Fiberglass

PVC

MJ/kgr
MJ/m3
0,1
150
0,24
31
0,42
819
0,79
2030
0,94
2350
1.3
2780
2,5
1380
2,5
3,3
8,1
8,9
9
15,9
30.3
32
51
62
70
70,6
93,3
117
220

()

Hardboard
MDF
OSB (Oriented Strand
Board)

10.2:

5170
112
21870
37210
4930
37500
970
251200
371280
519560
93620
631164
117500
3770
515700



(MJ/kgr)
10.00
8.00
16.00
11.00
15.00
15.00

PVC

MJ
5470
2150 - 2470
230 - 490

10.3:
1,201,20m



..
(. ).

10.1:

24


95%
.

10.4


,
.





(
)
(

,

).


4.5 GJ/m2 5,5 GJ/m2
..


4.620m2
(Cole and Kernan1996),


.

,
.

,

.

95%

20%.

,

:

25

(
)

()

/

-.

10.8:
(
).

10.7:


10.9:

.

26

,
(
)

.

( )

(.. : ;)
, -
.. .
,

,


.

10.10: GJ/m
(,
)

10.5


( )
,



.


,
. ,


, .

27

,
.

.


,
,

.



.

.

10.6


,
,


.
,




, ,

28

,



.



,


.

, ,

( )
,


.

,
Eco Balance
( )


.

ELUs (Environmental
Load Units).

,



.

,


, ,
, ,
..



.

-

29


,
,


.

11

11.1

SO2,

.

,
MJ
tCO2.
,

(, , , ..)
.


. -
,
.

,
,

.


,
CO2 .. (SO2, NOx)

, ..

,
1
MJ 0.098 kgr CO2.
,

,
(


)

SO2, NOx

CO2,
CO2 90%
.

30

)
/
.


.
:
,
.

11.2

,
, Low-Tech
architecture



:

Low-Tech

Low-Tech architecture (
)


( ,
).
,

.
, , ,
.

igloo .
..


,
.. .

,
Low-Tech
architecture ,

.

Low-Tech architecture


.

:
, (

31

,
.


--

( )

.


,

.

-
.

,
Low-Tech architecture,


.
:


.
,
.

,
.

11.1:

,
,

32

(-)

. ,
.


/
.

(rammed earth)

.


.
-,
.



, .

,


.


(.
.
..).


() .
(
) .

(cob)

- ,

33

.

(
).



.

, ,

.



.
,
.

,
( ,
..)
, ,
,
, .


,




(.. ..).

, bamboo ()
, bamboo ( )
(, ,
)
Low-Tech architecture.

,


.

-
.



.

,

,

34

12.1


. ,


.

,
(
)
.

bamboo



()
(-).





Shigeru Ban.



.. :

?
WTP (willingness to pay).
-
.

12

HPM
(hedonic price method).

.




: -
.

.. :
,
?.

35

,

. ,

,
(
)


.

12.2

...
ISO 14040.
..,



,
.

,

.



,


,
.




.



(
).


,

.
,



.


(
O 880/92)

36

12.3

.
" "
.



"
" (EPM Environmental Preference
Method).

12.4


-,
MCDA (multi-criteria decision analysis)

,


.
,

.

" "
1991



.



.

,
,
,



- .




.



.



vs vs

37

,
( ) ,
.


.

()
()

;



(..

;). ,

.

12.5

12.1:

,
,


. & .
:

... 2006.


,
() ...

(
)
.



,
,
,

38



.
,

,
.
,


.

,

.




.

12.1:

(-)


.


,

.

39

,


,
.

13

,

.
,

,
,

.

-
-




( -
)



R (Reuse, Reduce, Repair, Recycling)
, ,
.

12.2:

,
,

( )
.

,
,
,

(.. ),
(..

), -


,

.

40

Asif M., Muneer T. and Kelley R., Life cycle assessment:


A case study of a dwelling home in Scotland, Building
and Environment, Volume 42, Issue 3, March 2007,
pp 13911394.

,
.

Cole, R.J. and Kernan, P.C. (1996), Life-Cycle Energy


Use in Office Buildings, Building and Environment,
Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 307-317.

14

Comparing the Environmental Effects of Building


Systems, Wood the Renewable Resource Case Study
No.4, Canadian Wood Council, Ottawa, 1997.

, . . ,
, 2000.

Lawson B., Building Materials Energy and the


Environment: Towards Ecologically Sustainable
Development, Royal Australian Institute of
Architects1996.

. & . ,
, ,
,
, ... 2006.

Lenzen M. and Ch. Dey, Truncation error in embodied


energy analyses of basic iron and steel products,
Energy, Volume 25, Issue 6, June 2000, pp 577585.

.-,
, ,
2011.

Sustainable Building Technical Manual, Green Building


Design, Construction and Operations, Public
Technology Inc.1996.

.-, LOW TECH ,


;,
, - 2012.

Thormark C., A low energy building in a life cycleits


embodied energy, energy need for operation and
recycling potential, Building and Environment, Volume
37, Issue 4, April 2002, pp 429435.

.-, ,
, ,
2014.
67/548/ ( )

Treloar G., McCoubrie A. and E.D. Love P., Embodied


energy analysis of fixtures, fittings and furniture in

2002/91/ ( )

41

office buildings, Usha Iyer-Raniga 1999, Vol. 17 Issue


11, pp.403 410.
Wolley T., Kimmins S., Green Building Handbook, E & F
N Spon, 1999.
Yohanis Y.G.and B. Norton, Life-cycle operational and
embodied energy for a generic single-storey office
building in the UK, Energy, Volume 27, Issue 1,
January 2002, Pages 7792.

42