CME 302 Solutions Problem Set #1 Problem 1 Consider ν(x

) =
n i=1

|xi |.

(a) Show that ν(x) is a vector norm. (b) Construct the matrix norm induced by ν. (c) Find the minimum M1 and M2 and the maximum m1 and m2 such that m1 ν(x) ≤ x m2 ν(x) ≤ x are satisfied for any vector x. (d) For which vectors (if any) do the above inequalities hold with equality.
Solution
2 ∞

≤ M1 ν(x) ≤ M2 ν(x)

(a)

(ii) For all α ∈

(i) Clearly if x = 0 then ν(x) = 0. If x = 0, then there exists an i such that xi = 0, which implies that |xi | > 0, so ν(x) > 0.

Ê we have

n

n

ν(αx) =
i=1

|αxi | =

i=1

|α||xi | = |α|ν(x).

(iii) We have that
n n n n

ν(x + y) =
i=1

|xi + yi | ≤

i=1

|xi | + |yi| ≤

i=1

|xi | +

i=1

|yi | ≤ ν(x) + ν(y).

(b) Let aj ∈ m be the jth column of the matrix A ∈ matrix norm, A ν , as follows: A
ν

Ê

Êm×n .

We construct the induced

= max ν(Ax)
ν(x)=1 n

= max ν
ν(x)=1 j=1 n

xj aj |xj | ν(aj ) |xj | max ν(aj )
j

≤ max ≤ max
j

ν(x)=1

j=1

n ν(x)=1

j=1

≤ max ν(aj )

CME 302

Solutions Problem Set #1

October 24, 2007

Suppose that the kth column of A, ak , has the maximum ν-norm. Then this upper bound is achieved when x = ek . Here ek is the kth column of the identity matrix, the vector of all 0s with a 1 in the kth position. Thus, the induced matrix ν-norm is the maximum column sum: m A (c)
ν

= max

1≤j≤n

i=1

|aij | .

(i) m1 ν(x) ≤ x 2 Let x be the vector such that xi = |xi | for i = 1, . . . , n, and e be the vector of all ˆ ˆ ones. Then, ˆ ˆ ν(x) = xT e = xT e ≤ x 2 e 2 . ˆ √ But, e 2 = n and x 2 = x 2 , so ˆ √ ν(x) ≤ n x 2 . Thus, 1 √ ν(x) ≤ x n .

2

√ To prove that m1 = 1/ n is the maximum constant take x = e and the above bound is tight. (ii) x 2 ≤ M1 ν(x) Observe that
n 2 n

ν(x) =
i=1

2

|xi |

=
i=1

|xi |2 +

i=j

|xi | |xj | .

The rightmost term,

i=j

|xi | |xj |, is greater than or equal to zero and thus,
n

x

2 2

=
i=1

|xi |2 ≤ ν(x)2 .
2

Since both are norms and thus positive quantities, this implies that x Thus, 1 · x 2 ≤ ν(x).

≤ ν(x).

To prove that M1 = 1 is the minimum constant take x = ek and the above bound is tight. (iii) m2 ν(x) ≤ x We have that
∞ n

ν(x) =
i=1

|xi | ≤ n max |xi | = n x
i

2

CME 302

Solutions Problem Set #1

October 24, 2007

(iv)

1 · ν(x) ≤ x ∞ . n To prove that m2 = 1/n is the maximum constant take x to be a vector with x1 = x2 = · · · = xn and the above bound is tight. x ∞ ≤ M2 ν(x) We have that
n

Thus,

x

= max |xi | ≤
i

i=1

|xi | = ν(x).

Thus, x ∞ ≤ 1 · ν(x). To prove that M2 = 1 is the minimum constant take x = ek and the above bound is tight. (d) (i) For x = e we have n−1/2 ν(x) = x (ii) For x = αek with α ∈

Ê and k = 1, . . . , n we have Ê and k = 1, . . . , n we have

2.

x x

2

= ν(x). = ν(x).

(iii) For a vector x with x1 = x2 = · · · = xn , n−1 ν(x) = x (iv) For x = αek with α ∈

∞. ∞

Problem 2 Consider the weighted 2-norm
n 1/2

x where wi > 0 for all i. (a) Show that ·
w

w

=
i=1

wi |xi |

2

is a norm for any set of positive numbers.
w.

(b) Give an explicit expression for the matrix norm induced by ·
Solution

(a) First note that we can express

· x

w

in terms of ·
n 2 w

2.

We have that

=
i=1

wi |xi |2

3

CME 302

Solutions Problem Set #1

October 24, 2007

Because the wi ’s are all positive we can take their square root and thus move them inside the square
n

x

2 w

=
i=1

wi xi .
1/2 1/2

1/2

2

Let W be the diagonal matrix W = diag(w1 , . . . , wn ). Then x
2 w

= Wx

2 2

.
w

It follows from the inherited properties of the 2-norm that ·

is a norm.

(i) If x = 0 then x w = 0. To see that x w = 0 only if x = 0 note that since wi > 0 for all i = 1, . . . , n, the matrix W has full rank. Therefore W x = 0 only if x = 0. Thus, x w = 0 if and only if x = 0. (ii) For all α ∈

Ê

αx (iii) We have that x+y (b) Let A ∈
w

w

= W (αx)

2

= |α| W x

2

= |α| x
2+

w

.

= W (x + y)

2

= Wx + Wy

2

Ên×n then the induced w-norm of A is given by
A
w

≤ Wx

Wy

2

≤ x

w+

y

w

.

Ax w x=0 x w W Ax 2 = max x=0 Wx 2 = max

Since all the wi s are positive, W −1 exists, thus = max
x=0

W AW −1 W x Wx 2

2

Let y = W x, then x = W −1 y = max −1
W

y=0

W AW −1 y y 2

2

Since W −1 is full rank W −1 y = 0 implies that y = 0. So = max
y=0

W AW −1 y y 2 W AW −1
2

2

.

Thus, A
w

=

. 4

CME 302

Solutions Problem Set #1

October 24, 2007

Problem 3 A norm · is said to be unitarily invariant if A = where U T U = I and V T V = I. (a) Show that ·
2

UAV T

and

·

F

are unitarily invariant.

(b) Let A be an m × n matrix and let p = min{m, n}. Show that A
F 2 2 = (σ1 + · · · + σp )1/2

where σ1 ≥ σ2 ≥ · · · ≥ σp > 0 are the singular values of A.
Solution

(a)

(i) From the definition of the matrix 2-norm we have UAV T
2

= max
x

2 =1

UAV T x

2

Let z = AV T x. Since U is an orthogonal matrix for the vector 2-norm Uz z 2. = max
x
2 =1

2

=

AV T x

2

Let y = V T x. Again, since V T is orthogonal, the constraint x to the constraint y 2 = V T x 2 = x 2 = 1. So = max
y
2 =1

2

= 1 is equivalent

Ay
2 F

2

= A

2

(ii) We can express the Frobenius norm as A UAV T Since U T U = I we have
2 F

= tr(AT A). Thus,

= tr(V AT U T UAV T )

= tr(V AT AV T ) Using the fact that tr(AB) = tr(BA) = tr(V T V AT A) Since V T V = I we arrive at the result = tr(AT A) = A
2 F

. 5

CME 302

Solutions Problem Set #1

October 24, 2007

(b) Using the singular value decomposition we can represent every matrix A ∈ m×n as A = UΣV T , where U ∈ m×m with U T U = I, V ∈ n×n with V T V = I and Σ ∈ m×n with Σ = diag(σ1 , . . . , σp ), observe that since rank(A) ≤ min(m, n) we have that the number of singular values is p = min(m, n). Thus we have

Ê

Ê

Ê

Ê

A Using the result that ·
F

F

=

UΣV T

F

is unitarily invariant we have that = Σ
F

Applying the definition of the Frobenius norm, and noting the structure of Σ, we arrive at the result
2 2 = σ1 + · · · + σp 1/2

.

Problem 4
Our hero is the intrepid, yet sensitive matrix A. Our villain is E , who keeps perturbing A. ˜ When A is perturbed he puts on a crumpled hat: A = A + E . —G.W. STEWART and JI-GUANG SUN, Matrix Perturbation Theory (1990) via N. HIGHAM, Accuracy and Stability of Numerical Algorithms (2002)

Let A be a square nonsingular matrix and let x⋆ be the true solution Ax⋆ = b for some given vector b. Suppose we have an approximate solution x ≃ x⋆ . Let r = b − Ax be the associated residual, and define the rank-one matrix E= rxT x 2

(The 2-norm is used throughout this question.) ˜ ˜ (a) Show that x is the exact solution of Ax = b where A = A + E. (b) Show that E = r / x . (We call this a backward error for x.)

(c) Suppose x is the exact solution of (A + F )x = b for some other matrix F . Show that F ≥ E . (This means that E is an optimal backward error.)
Solution

6

CME 302

Solutions Problem Set #1

October 24, 2007

(a) We have that (xT x)r ˜ Ax = Ax + Ex = Ax + = Ax + r = Ax + b − Ax = b. x 2 (b) From the definition of the the matrix 2-norm we have that E Using the relation xT y = x and y we have = max
y=0

rxT y x
2

y

y cos θ, where θ is the angle between the vectors x x y |cos θ| r x 2 y

= max
y=0

Observing that this quantity is maximized when x = y we obtain the desired result: E = x x
2 2

r x

=

r . x

(c) Let’s assume that we do not have a trivial solution x = 0. We can manipulate (A + F )x = b to find F x = b − Ax = r. We don’t know anything about F except that the matrix vector product F x = r. Taking norms we have that r = F x ≤ F x . Since x = 0 we have that x = 0. Dividing by x in the relation above we obtain E Thus, F ≥ E . = r x ≤ F .

7