1

2

3

Jose Castaneda, aka James Blume, USMC Honorable et. al
and others Similarly Situated ...(JOINDER)
1242314 N. Alexandria Avenue
P.O. Box 947
Los Angeles Ca, 90029
Pasadena, CA 91102
(323) 663-1397 (Messages)
(626)380-5439
Please Respond in Writing
kasta626@gmail.com

FILE UPON DEMAND
PER THE CONSTITUTION

4

5
6
7

CRIMINAL

COMPLAINT.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. AND AFFIDA VIT

8
9

10

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND LAW ENFORCEMENT
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT; & BURBANK POLICE ET. AL.

11
12
13
14
15

Connected Case(s): GC 045202. BC453664,
BC470365, BD3I7479/BI68653, D.A.4560830910 Al02 FL0008670, 08UI6492, IOU025481
2. Jose Castaneda, et a1
BV028409,BC464832, BC470365,
BC4 73026,11 U03997, BC46483I ,
Plaintiffs, Complainants, & Victimsl BC453664,BC470365, BC477065, B 16FR021
] GA36, LAHD 274072 / BC485710 ...
1. James Blume, USMC Honorable, et al

]
]
]
]
]

]

16

Vs.

] File, Tracking, or Case No.:

]

17

1. William D. Stewart, Burbank Court, et al

18

2. Supervisin~ Judffe of Courthouse,

19

Defendants and Peroetrators
20

22

1. C omp 1ex C·nmma
. 1 C ase (U n l'mute
. d)

23

2. Consolidation Demanded

25

]
]
]
]
]
]

]

21

24

] A. Criminal Complaint and Formal Criminal
] Charges for Arrest
B. Demand Private Person's Arrest "by-law"
per Constitution and Laws
C. Demand Criminal Investigation, by Internal
Affair's Division, Atten. Detectives to Arrest

]] D. Whistle-blower Protection Requested
] E. Restraining Order against dirty Judges

]
]

3. Jury Trials withheld
4. Filer's Bill of Rights

26

5. ADAAdvocate

Requested

]

Be advised; we have the Evidence; and will

] come in for an Interview to cooperate in this
] Criminal EnterPrise to Sell or Purchase
] Decisions from the Courts. In California.

]

] Demand a "Filer~ Bill of Rights"!

27

28
- 1 of 24 - with 10 Exhibits
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND FORMAL CRIMINAL CHARGES, DEMAND FOR ARREST, CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION
ON THE CRIMINAL, WHISTLE-BLOWER
PROTECTION, RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST DIRTY JUDGES

1 1. INTRODUCTION:

TO ALL THE COURT(S) AND HEARINGS IN THE UNITED STATES,

2

WHETHER IT'S STATE OR FEDERAL, CIVIL OR CRIMINAL, TO ALL INTERESTED

3

PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD; ALSO TO ALL LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

4

OR HEARINGS, ALL INVESTIGATORS
LAW ENFORCEMENT

CIVIL OR CRIMINAL, ALL SUPERVISORS, AND

AGENCIES. BE ADVISED OF THIS "COMPLEX

CASE" BY LAW

5

BECAUSE IT'S IN CALIFORNIA THAT VIOLATES THE CONSTITUTION WHICH IS
6
7

TREASON AND BETRAYAL IN OUR OWN JUDICIARY SYSTEM TO RECEIVE "JUDICIAL
KICK-BACKS" TO JUDICIAL HATRED.

8
9

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE ~ 8 (c) (n and (e) "Constructinf

Pleadin~s":

10

"Pleadings must be construed so as to do justice" or as "substantial iustice. " Don't violate this

11

Law, and "Blow Off" this Formal Criminal Complaint due to spellings, errors, or the color of my

12

skin. It is also your sworn duty to serve and fmd solutions by making a criminal arrests as granted by

13

the Constitution and our Laws. But Judges are above the Law, so the citizen's arrest that is demanded
won't be done which proves prejudice, discrimination, and bribery when the Laws are NOT applied

14

by Law, or equally by Law.
15
16

17

PLEASE TAKE "JUDICIAL NOTICE"

under the Constitution to have a Soeedv Trial with a Jury

of mv Peers, under the State's Constitution, The State's Penal Code, Federal Rules of Civil

18

Procedure Code, and the Calil.ornia Civil Procedure Code §§ 451- 453 .... of all my Rights to present

19

my case, exercise my rights, to present my Evidence in this Claim, to present this Formal Complaint,

20

Affidavit, Order To Show Cause, and Criminal Charges in my Criminal Complaint for an arrest. Take

21
22

Judicial and Administrative Notice of the series of Judicial and Administrative Crimes and Criminal
Acts perpetrated in a Court of law that's spreading across the nation for a Judicial Bribe and Hatred
in California's Court System to Sell or Purchased Predictive Verdicts or Decisions in any Legal

23

Proceeding in the United States. This is a Crime of (Judicial Bribea, violation of:Penal Code §.67 & 68,
24

Judicial ConsI!ira~ under Penal Code§ 182. Title 18t 241,242. & 246! Conspiracv to violate RiK.hts,back-

25

door the Constitution, and wlJich are Felonv's with extreme Preiudice with Judicial and AtJministrative

26

Racisml

27
28
- 2 of 24 - with 10 Exhibits
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND FORMAL CRIMINAL CHARGES, DEMAND FOR ARREST, CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION
ON THE CRIMINAL, WHISTLE-BLOWER
PROTECTION, RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST DIRTY JUDGES

1 II JUDICIAL

GA TE: You see, these Judicial and Administrative Shams and Scams have been going

2

on for years to violate rights for personal and promotional gain based on Judicial or Administrative

3

Acts of Bribery, Facilitation, and Judicial Racketeering. For the court or others to get a Bribe or out

4

5

of Extreme Judicial Hatred, the Courts and Hearings in California turned into a JllI/idal Entewrise to
Sell or Purchased a Court "Decisions" from the Judge, Magistrate, or Law Enforcement Agency; and
for solid and concrete proof... vou can't have the Jury Trial unless vou pav a bribe "WHICH"

6

lI11roves the Judicial Bribery with extreme Judicial Preiudice. Judicial Racism. and Judicial
7

8

IIDiscriminatory Practices that violate the Constitution! That's whv People in Pro-Per NEVER eet a
II Jury Trial. never fet a Fair Trial ifvour colored or poor. violalin: vour Rifhts. and thr

9

II Constitution: which becomes an act of Treason! For factual proof, how can James Blume or others
10

who are colored, uneducated, or disabled with seizures, and Blume being a former USMC Honorable

11

Marine be a Vexatious Litigant? How can a disabled Marine, with (3) Consolidations become a

12

Vexatious Litigant, in the whole United States? That makes no sense! And with (3) Three

13
14

Consolidations, be a Vexatious Litigant when he can't even form the necessary "Intent" due to his
seizures and mental disabilities and does NOT fit the legal "criteria"??? That's impossible unless this
poor guy was set up and framed to be one by Hatred and extreme Prejudice because he was a

15

"Whistle-Blower"!
16

17

!! For

factual proof with factual evidence, "NOT" one person to a Judge,

Attorneys, or a Court Clerk, to even a Cop or Law Enforcement Officer ever addressed this issue to
this guy who served our Country, BUT HE EVEN SERVED HIS OWN COMMUNITY AS A

18

POLICE OFFICER, RISKING HIS LIFE TO KEEP US SAFE AT NIGHT! "AND" NO ONE ...

19

came to his defense, gave him any assistance, or even reported this crimes executed in Court to

20

Silence him because you can't be a "Factual" Vexatious Litigant with three Consolidation, that were

21

denied to make him one; WHICH IS JUDICIAL OR ADMINISTRATIVE
the Courts INTENTIONALLY

ENTRAPMENT!!!

When

denied James Blume and others Consolidation; it was Judicial or

22

Administrative E1Jtrqpment to make you one ... just by "Framing" this guy or Marine who served our
23

country Honorably. But to use and apply this cruel trick and tactic to a guy who was Disabled who
24

was even a Police Officer who served his own community; is just Nasty and Criminal!!! There is no

25

excuse for this type of cruel treatment to use the Laws "Illegally" and "Criminally" to get what you

26

want by Fraud! No one can Supersede the Constitution; unless you live in California and you are a

27

judicial or administrative dirt bags who allowed these series of Judicial or Administrative Tactics on

28

the disahled who are helpless or always at

iJ

dj::wdY~Dtag~ who hecome

Wl,ls.tl~-Bkr~~Iswh~tJJtb~

- 3 of 24 - with 10 Exhibits
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND FORMAL CRIMINAL CHARGES, DEMAND FOR ARREST, CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION
ON THE CRIMINAL, WHISTLE-BLOWER
PROTECTION, RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST DIRTY JUDGES

1

Complain about the Judicial Criminal Acts used to get any purchased decision you want, instead of

2

true justice! Can the Judges in California "Back-doors"

3

hatred to engineer a person to be a Vexatious Litigant by "Framing him" to silence him while

4

denying true justice for a veteran who has an Honorable Discharge who served in the Marines, Navy,

5
6
7

8
9

the Constitution and our Rights for a Bribe to

and Army? Has all these agencies or Courts stooped so low to sabotage cases; by withholding an

II Advocate or Access

Coordinator when he requested one BUT withheld to set him up to Lose, become
Vexatious Litigant by Entrapment by withholding his Rights which is the proof of Judicial

Entrapment to silence James Blume and others; by criminal acts in a Legal Proceeding! Please
address this issue and my concern in court and on record or on the Law Enforcement Record when
you receive this complaint to review the crime recorded on the Court Tape, as part of your sworn

10

duty to investigate and make an Arrest! Because, what's next, to by-pass my Miranda Ri~hts too when

11

you plant fake evidence on a person or on me to arrest me for Exposing the "J,lJdicial Pav to Play,

12

II Scams"; to arrest the people like Blume for being a "Whistle Blower" for exposing your Scams or

13

Judicial Enterprise to steal, sell, or buy decisions in a Court or a Hearing, for a Bribe to Racism in
this country!!! For solid and Factual proofthat the Courts are "Rigged" to sell decisions from the

14

Bench to a Hearing Officer or Hearing Panel; why are "Our Rights" always violated, Criminal Acts
15
16

17

"attached" to a Civil Proceeding, and Case Law, Case Precedence, Rule of Law, Stare Decisis, along
with the state's mandatory "Sentencing Guidelines" are NOT USED or FOLLOWED by Law which
proves prejudice with rights violations by the Criminal Acts in a Civil Proceeding!!! Why, if it's the

18

Law to use Case Law, Case Precedence, Stare Decisis, along with the state's mandatory Sentencing

19

Guidelines?! Because we are NOT white, but scum, and stupid to use our Courts or the

20

Constitution??? For proof, we are allowed to face our accusers; BUT denied access to enter the

21

Court! For proof, it shows, displays, and proves we are NOT allow in Court! To prove and verify this
truthful fact; it states on Court Records ... "No Al!l?earances". Then it becomes a Judicial Lynching!!!

22
23

A. CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND FORMAL CRIMINAL CHARGES FOR ARREST: I, and the

24

People or others who can't step up like James Blume, USMC Honorable, because of his disability

25

are ... "ajoinder",

26

"uniting of several causes of action or parties in a single suit". In Federal Practice, a

party "may join, either as independent, or as alternative claims, as many claims, legal, equitable, or
maritime, as he has against the opposing party" Fed R. Civ. Proc. 18(a).

s.e See

also id. At Rules 19-23.

27

See also class action, cross-claim; counterclaim;
28

impleader; interpleader; real party in interest" ... and in

- 4 of 24 - with 10 Exhibits
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND FORMAL CRIMINAL CHARGES, DEMAND FOR ARREST, CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION
ON THE CRIMINAL, WHISTLE-BLOWER
PROTECTION, RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST DIRTY JUDGES

1

this formal Criminal Complaint to Law Enforcement of Criminal acts in a Courts, James Blume and

2

others demand a Citizen's Arrest or a Private Person's Arrest per my rights and the Constitution as

3

allowed on Exhibit 1#. Please follow the Law, my rights, and execute the Private Person Arrest per

4

5
6
7

our Laws and the Constitution, on Exhibit 1#, a Copy of an Arrest form to arrest William Stewart.
Now, as a sworn officer of the law, you must execute the Private Person's Arrest as demanded.

POINTS AND AUTHORITIES, ALONG WITH THE CRIMINAL CHARGES: l.(Penal Code § 837.
(authority to arrest). No one is above the Law, no one; unless a Bribe is paid or extreme prejudice is

8

allowed with extreme Racism in California's Court System! 2.(Penal Code § 1}51False or forfled

9

instrument for record, felony, was allowed.

3.(Penal Code § 115.3 Altered certified Copy of o(ficial
4.(Penal Code § 132. Offerinfl offalse

10

record, was used and allowed in the Legal Proceedings.

11

evidence, Penal Code § 134. Preparinfl offalse evidence, a felony used as another Judicial Tactic to get a

12

Purchased Decision from the Courts,

13

paid.

5.(Penal Code § 135. Destrovinfl evidence, after a Bribe was

6.(Penal Code § 137. Influencinf! testimonJ!.,by criminally "steering" or "guiding" cases to a

Purchased and Predetermine Outcome; a felony

and all committed in a court of Law, and on Court

14

Record with evidence; that's never maintained
15
16

17

Breaking the 7.("Chain o[Custody") when your

evidence id stolen from the courts!!!
Seized the Record, Filings, the Court Tapes, and Files to prove the Criminal Acts were
perpetrated in a Court of Law to sell decisions; BUT IT EVEN PROVES IT'S APART OF THE

18

PROCEEDINGS TO PROVE IT'S EVEN "DESIGNED" OR "INGRAINED" INTO THE

19

JUDICIAL BRIBERY SCAM! If the judicial criminal acts and tactics was apart of our Legal

20

Proceedings and allowed; how can we have a/air Trial or Hearing in this Jurisdiction when illegal

21
22

and Judicial or Administrative

Criminal Acts are allowed to come to a "Predetermine Outcome"

using these tricks, tactics, and criminal techniques developed to sabotage cases for a bribe to
hatred on the People that violates Public Policv, The Court of Public Opinion. along with the

23

Constitution? Is this what you, the Constitution, and the Courts or Hearings are really about...
24
25
26
27

committing Judicial Racketeering, Judicial Facilitation, and Judicial Fraud, to sell decisions by
violating our Rights using JudicialFraut!?
For proof, and to verifY this factual information that the "Chain o{Custodv" was violated and
broken for "Unjust Rewards" of the case file of GC045202 was "intentionally" tampered with by

28
- 5 of 24 - with 10 Exhibits
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND FQRMAL C~lMINAL CHARGES, DEMAND FOR ARREST, CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION
ON THE CRIMINAL, WHISTLE-BLOWER
PROTECTION, RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST DIRTY JUDGES

1

criminal means, investigate WHY, after informing Judge Stewart ofthe Court's Mafia syndicate, and

2

Judicial Racketeerinfl Qperation that operated out of Pasadena's Court at the November 21,2014

3

hearing, WHY the Summons, The Civil Case Cover Sheet, and the Case Addendum THAT were

4

5

withheld, missing, and stolen in the Appeal B229512, were "magically" disappeared, then appeared,
then re-inserted in the file, after Judge Simpson Order and assigned it, then gave Jurisdiction, in a
case that proves the court "fixing cases" by these series of Judicial Criminal Acts of breaking into

6

Court Files for a Bribe sending it in a "Judicial Loop"! By Statutory Law, Plaintiff was THE
7

prevailing party, because DISBARRED Attorney Conway DID NOT respond to the complaint within

8

30 days as required and prescribed by law. But no one want's to address this issue! Also, how can I be

9

a Vexatious Litigant, ifmy "OWN" Attorney was disbarred and I had to clean up his mess! That's

10

11
12

13

NOT Fair!!!
In addition, with undisputed evidence, the "DISBARRED Attorney Jack Kenneth Conway"
SB# 45063 declares and stipulates to the court On document labeled as # 000281, sent to the Court of
Appeals, in case B229512 that reads ...
"On September 24,2010, I appeared in Department

"R" of the above entitled court to urge

14

the Court to grant the motion for judgment

on the pleadings on the Plaintiffs

Amended

15

Complaint, the motion which I had prepared, filed and served upon the Plaintiff."
16

17

This stipulation, statement, declaration, affidavit CONTRADICTS the court minutes that are
found at another filing ... on page labeled as ... 000283, The Court minutes of 9/24/201 0 that were

18

entered into the record reads that (NO APPEARANCES)

19

lie is the truth when they CONFLICT each other and one is a Factual Lie? Because both statements

20

can't be right; WHEN THEY CONFLICT WITH EACH OTHER! Two wrongs do not make a right,

21

and I am the losing party because this is a crime of judicial fraud, with extreme prejudice! The same

22

were made by any of the parties! WHICH

exact tactic was made, used, and applied by Attorney James R. Felton in a related matter in case
GC045202, Ramirez v. Castaneda, where attorney Felton seized my home illegally, aided and abetted

23

by dishonest Judge DeVanon who's already in trouble, and Joseph Francis who becomes an
24
2S

Accomplice. At the hearing of July 5, 2011, in Department "S", of the now closed Department due to
the Judicial Corruption, Attorney Felton stipulates, declares that HE, showed up to the hearing, and

26

that NO APPEARANCES

2/

Attorney Felton DID NOT SHOWED UP, proven by the Court Minutes that proves the former

28

OffiCl::;f ·IaJll~::iRlllme,

were made by Defendant, Jose Castaneda! THIS IS A LIE! IN FACT,

Fdu~rdoRQmero. aud C~~tmeda djd ?p,pearedQo tbat day Attorneys lie, Qh~at,

- 6 of 24 - with 10 Exhibits
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND FORMAL CRIMINAL CHARGES, DEMAND FOR ARREST, CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION
ON THE CRIMINAL, WHISTLE-BLOWER
PROTECTION, RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST DIRTY JUDGES

1

and steal liked this scumbags that took my home illegally by using Judicial Facilitation and Judicial

2

IIRacketeerin:! This is the NO APPEARANCES TACTIC, used over and over again! For Solid proof;
3 I demand the Court Tapes to prove who was there! Let see who is lying in a Court of Law for a
Judicial Bribe!?
4

5

B. DEMAND PRlV ATE PERSON'S ARREST "BY-LAW" PER CONSTITUTION AND THE
6
7

LAWS: See Exhibit 1#. signed and allowed by Law. Please take him, Mr. William Stewart into
Custody immediately by "Cite and Releasinv him" for this series of Judicial Criminal Acts with

8

Judicial Fraud to violate rights "recorded" on the Court Tapes as Evidence of this Assault and Civil

9

Rights Violations! Again, no one is above the Law, unless a Bribe to Prejudice is allowed in our

10

Legal Proceedings or Administrative Hearings with corrupt officials breaking the Law!

11
12

13

SliE EXHIBIT 2#; OFFICIAL COURT RECORDS; of the Court Minutes! This is a Lie, and
Fraudulent! For proof, the Records don't match the Taped Proceeding to prove it's a Lie that was
manufactured Evidence by the Court; BUT MANUFACTURED

EVIDENCE TO COMMIT

14

JUDICIAL FRAUD FOR A BRIBE WITH PREJUDICE! It states only Jose Castaneda; BUT
15
16

17

WHICH ONE, SINCE TWO JOSE CASTANEDA'S WERE THERE AND ON THE COURT TAPE!
This is Judicial Fraud, Judicial Conspiracy, and with Judicial Racketeerinfl!

The court records was

already tampered with to hinder our rights or to even get a fair Hearing or Trial in this State!

18
19

NOW, SEE EXHIBIT 3#; James Blume's Filings on Jose Castaneda's same case with two different

20

dates? Why, if!, James Blume swear I turned in my Court Filings onll-23-2015,

21

Dated" right before my very eyes by the Court Clerk when Jose Castaneda's mailed his in on that

it was "Back-

Date; NOT ME! Jose Castaneda mailed in his Complaint on or about 01-21-2015, but Blume went to
22

the Court Clerk's Office 11-23-2015; when she changed the date of the Filings to add to the confusioni
23

to get a purchased and predictive decision! This is Judicial or Administrative Fraud; WHICH TAINT
24

THE PROCEEDING!

25

26 II COURT INCIDENT: On 11-23-2015, I, James Blume. USMC Honorable was in Court in front of
27

II Mister Stewart, when I claimed I was Jose Castaneda by court Order from Judge Buckley; and

28
- 7 of 24 - with 10 Exhibits
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND FORMAL CRIMINAL CHARGES, DEMAND FOR ARREST, CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION
ON THE CRIMINAL, WHISTLE-BLOWER
PROTECTION, RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST DIRTY JUDGES

1 another person claimed he was Jose Castaneda too! Why didn't the Court, or Mister Stewart "ClarifY"
2

in a legal proceeding known as a "Clarification Hearinf" who was the true Jose Castaneda when two

3

different people appeared who claimed that they were both Jose Castaneda!!! There is a third Jose

4

5

Castaneda on his Vexatious Litigant List too! How does the Judge knows who's in his own Court
while adjudicating a case with two different parties claiming to be that one person? Also, Exhibit 3#
was turned in on 11-23-15; why was it back-dated to 11-21-2015, when this copy was turned in on

6

11-23-15 by James Blume, aka Jose Castaneda too??? (See the t0l' of Exhibit 3#. Lines 1-3#) It states
7

James Blume! Not Jose Castaneda!! !l Can you legally back-dated Legal Documents to make it false;

8

when I needed the Correct "factual" date of l1-23-20l5!!!

9

Fraud, and a criminal act to back-date Legal Filings by the Court Clerks! Back-Dated or "Back-

What' going on here??? This is Judicial

10

Dating" is illegal, and is a Crime of Judicial or Administrative Fraud! To verify the Factual Judicial

11

Crime, and the Judicial or Administrative Fraud; See Exhibit 4#, dated 11-23-2015. How can this be,

12

if it is Contradicted by Exhibit 3#: and was back-dated on 11-23-2015; but stamped the false date of

13

01-21-2015, and for proof see Exhibit 4#; to prove I am telling the whole and factual truth!

14

On Exhibit 4#; from the court's web site ... on Arrow 4#; shows, displays, and proves that the case was
15
16

17

"Set at Court Calender "12"; when we were placed "factually" at number "1" #!!! This is a Lie and
another Trick using Judicial Fraud to lose our cases by stating false information! Why didn't those
other cases go before our case as "Set" by Law; AND WITHOUT OUR PERMISSION TO PROVE

18

WE WERE SET UP TO LOSE!!! Then it states Jose Castaneda, BUT which one; and with who's

19

Filings and which dates of all the filings are used, referred to, or used when there are multiple Jose

20

Castaneda's used everywhere in this court? Judge Buckley's Castaneda or Conway's Castaneda? We

21

will never know, since Attorney Conway was never allowed to testifY; or to even help clear up which

22

Castaneda was involved with him!!! And who's Paper Work, Complaint, or "Work Production" were
we going over; Jose Castaneda or Blume's work as Jose Castaneda? And with the wrong date to

23

screw the Judge on the Bench; WHICH was Mister Stewart!!! This is why Mr. William Stewart
24

became "Nuts" on the Bench, and why Mr. Stewart lost his "Presences of Mind" !!! He couldn't folloW'

25

the "Back-dating" of Documents executed by the Court clerk, or the right Jose Castaneda he ordered

26

to do the filings on Exhibit 5#! !! See Exhihit 5#, for proof! !! He doesn't know who he ordered; as

27

proven on Exhibit

3 af(d the

VL Order or several9Jstaneda's includinr! one in a Whee/(;hair#!?

28
- 8 of 24 - with 10 Exhibits
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND FORMAL CRIMINAL CHARGES, DEMAND FOR ARREST, CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION
ON THE CRIMINAL, WHISTLE-BLOWER
PROTECTION, RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST DIRTY JUDGES

1

C. DEMAND CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION,

2

BURBANK POLICE DEPARTMENT; ALONG WITH THE ARREST OF MISTER WILLIAM

3

STEWARD FOR OBSTRUCTION, TITLE 18,241,242,246

BY INTERNAL AFFAIR'S DIVISION OF THE

...

4

5

ATTEN. BURBANK POLICE DETECTIVES (Internal AUairs Division): See Exhibits 1-6#, a series of
"Fraudulent" legal documents that are misleading and inaccurate; the Court Minutes are fake; since

6

nothing was clarified by Law and the dates were changed "Intentionally" on the Filings witnessed by
7
8
9
10

James Blume, USMC which is Judicial Fraud! This is a Lie; which becomes Fraud! Under Plaintiff
on Exhibit 3#, it' factually states James Blume, aka Jose Castaneda, when it was really James Blume,
USMC Honorable, and for proof see the Court Audio Tapes and NOT the Court Filings! This is a

II False instrument for record. violation of Penal Code §115~Felonv. The Plaintiffs were Jose Castaneda

11

and James Blume, USMC Honorable posing as Jose Castaneda by court Order making James Blume

12

a Mexican per Court Order rendered in the past. And the Judge, Mr. Stewart allowed this Judicial

13

Fraud in his Court for a Bribe!!! For proof, he did NOT do a "Clarification Hearin~" as required by
Law when Two people show up as the same person! The Judge allowed the Judicial Fraud in his

14

presents and in his Court to prove we were "never" going to be heard, or heard properly because were
15

Mexicans! Why? Because he, Mister Stewart never intended to hear our case or hear it "Properly"
16

17

because he did NOT care who was even in his "own" Court! We were set up to lose, BUT TO
SCREW WITH US, BUT IN VIOLATION OF "RULE FRCP 8" as listed on Page 2, lines 5-9!

18
19

CRIMEN FALSI: "a crime of deceit. (In a Legal Proceeding) (Fraud Upon The Court) At Common

20

Law a "Crimen Falsi was a crime containing the elements offalsehoods andfraud. See 141 N.E. 2d 202,

21

206. A person who had committed such a crime, which was described as one which "iniuriouslv aflects the
administration onustice by the introduction of[alsehoo4s and [raud". Complaintant( s) states this is what

22

was done to all his case(s) and others; BUT WAS EVEN "TARGETED" as Mexicans to show the
23

"Intent" to commit this judicial criminal act because he, all the Castanedas and others was "Self

24

Represented", and was an easy mark, a judicial fall guy, another judicial patsy by a series of Judicial

25

Criminal Tactics used and developed by the Court System in California to sell decisions or lose your

26

case due to extreme hatred. (Whistle-Blower Protection Demanded) It continues to state ... "A person

27

who had committed such a crime, which was described as one which "injuriously affects the administration

28

Qfjm'tice by the introduction offal5ehoodti andfraud; BUTwlU' gilnilrally disqualifiedfl'om appb'll'ing as a
- 9 of 24 - with 10 Exhibits
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND FORMAL CRIMINAL CHARGES, DEMAND FOR ARREST, CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION
ON THE CRIMINAL, WHISTLE-BLOWER
PROTECTION, RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST DIRTY JUDGES

1

witness in any judicial proceeding. See 1 F. 784 787 and 207 F. 327,331. Examples includes forgery,

2

perjury, subornation

3

of perjury; suppression of testimony by, or conspiracy, to procure the absents of, a

witness; and the fraudulent

making or alteration of a writing". See

5 A.

2d 804, 805. Judicial Fraud was

applied, with conspiracy to NOT allow the poor, colored, uneducated, or disabled in a Court of Law!
4

For proof, the Filings had the wrong dates, no Clarification was made, done, or executed and a
5

Criminal Act of "Assault". a violation of Penal Code
6

§220.

by Mister Stewart, on the Bench was

committed in Court which proves he has "No Honor"; when he threw my Paper Work or my Filings

7

at me with the wrong dates and people listed in this case! You see, "Factually" Blume was disabled;

8

shaken up and assaulted by the Judge who lost Jurisdiction as a Judge, when Mister William Steward

9

"Threw" Jose Castaneda's Case File at James Blume, USMC Honorable in a threatening manner and

10

Assault him. To proved it was a crime of Assault.

under Penal Code 6220 but that he was crazy and

11 II Preiudice. under CCP 170.6 that was recorded on Court Tapes when the crime happened and was
committed on official record! Can a Judge use unlawful "Physical Force" and threaten a Party and
12

13

commit a crime in a Legal Proceeding on record; disrespect them because he didn't like Mexican in
his Court which is a crime that was recorded, like Judge Buckley who made James Blume a Mexican

14

by Court Order; when he is NOT a Mexican??? Can a Magistrate in his Official Capacity; Assault

15

some one by Unlawful Force and Judicial Threat while commit a crime, and hear his case while

16

being Prejudice and Disrespectful with criminal acts perpetrated against a party he was

17

"INVOL VED" with using hate in his Judicial Capacity?

18
19
20
21

(JUDICIAL) CRIMINAL COERCION: "the common law offense of extortion has been broaden by
modern statues to encompass any person who, acting with purpose to restrict unlawfullv another's freedom,
of action to his detriment. threatens to commit any criminal offense, accuse anvone or a criminal offense.
expose any secret tending to subject any person to hatred, contempt, or ridicule, impair his credit or

22

business repute, or threatens to take or withhold action as an official, or cause an official to take or

23

withhold action. Model Penal Code

24

an unlawfulfee
required

§212.5 Common

law extortion was limited to the corrupt collection of

by an officer acting under COLOR OF OFFICE with no proof of threat, force, or duress

621 F. 2d 123, 124. IfJlroJlertx is obtained as a result of criminal coercion, the conduct then

25

constitutes thUt by f:;S/ortion since that form of theft encompasses today any conduct which is now
26
27

proscribed by the criminal coercion statute." See coercion. I was NOT allowed to use the Court free fro

bias, prej udice, threats, judicial coercion, and was even Judicially Assaulted in Court by a Criminal

28
- 10 of 24 - with 10 Exhibits
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND FORMAL CRIMINAL CHARGES, DEMAND FOR ARREST, CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION
ON THE CRIMINAL, WHISTLE-BLOWER
PROTECTION, RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST DIRTY JUDGES

1 lion

the Bench!

2

3
4

5

D. WHISTLE-BLOWER

PROTECTION REQUESTED: I, James Blume, USMC Honorable, et al

and the People, demand "proper" justice and to Set 4side the Judgment by Mister William Stewart of
this case; and demand for a Re- Trial or a do-over, free from Judicial Corruption by a "Judicial
Change of Venue" to another state or Federal Court in another state due to extreme Prejudice and the

6

criminal acts of Assault by Mister Stewart in a Court of Law recorded on tape! I also demand
7

"PROTECTION"

in a form of a "Restraininv Order" from the Courts and Law Enforcement in

8

California till me case is Heard for a "Filers Bill of Rif-hts" to use our courts free from Judicial

9

Corruption, Judicial Facilitation, and Judicial Racketeering!

10

This would save Billions of Tax-Payers money by cutting down on Court Filings; and under

11

the Whistle-blowers Law, I am claiming the Reward by Law for the saving the Tax-Payers Billions and

12

also by "Exposing" criminal judicial acts used to sell decisions from the Bench as displayed,

13

observed, and allowed in a Legal Proceeding that violates Rights and the Constitution! When a
Criminal Act is involved in any Legal Process; the Proceeding is automatically tainted, contaminated,

14

and sullied .... voided by Law!
15

I demand in the name of Justice that Mr. William Stewart's decision(s) be automatically "Set

16

Aside" due to his Criminal Acts and performance of Assault that's connected with his Office,

17

Authority, and position this case and his prejudicial decisions, "WHEN" his true Prejudice came out

18

by a violent burst and criminal act of JudiciglAssault,

19

came out in a "Judicial RflJ:~" in a Legal Proceeding to be Set Aside, re-tried, and a Change of Venue

20

to another state be granted based on the Evidence, Criminal Acts, and the Judicial Stalking to

21

and clear disrespect of the People's Cases that

engineer cases to a Predictive Outcome by Criminal Acts allowed in our Courts to sell decisions.

22

SET ASIDE: "to annul. or make void. as to "set aside" ajudgment. When proceedings are irregular, they
23

may be set aside on a motion of the party whom they injuriously affect. See motion to set aside Judgment. "

24

See also reverse ... I, James Blume, USMC Honorable wants to exercise my Rights of Criminal Arrest,

25

and to Set aside all of Mister Stewart's rulings with "Good Cause" to allow this demand!

26
27

28

E. RESTRAINING ORDER BY LAW ENFORCEMENT:

I, James Blume, USMC Honorable is

making several common sense motions, demands, and requests of a Re~hearing, a Change of Venue,
- 11 of 24 - with

10 Exhibits

CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND FORMAL CRIMINAL CHARGES, DEMAND FOR ARREST, CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION
ON THE CRIMINAL, WHISTLE-BLOWER
PROTECTION, RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST DIRTY JUDGES

1

a fair Trial or Hearing, our Hearing Tapes to prove the Crime was committed and even recorded on

2

official tapes, and for damages of Pain and Suffering from the Assault of a Judge on the Bench on

3

Jose Castaneda aka James Blume to be a Mexican named Jose Castaneda per Judge Buckley!

4

5

Mr. James Blume, aka a Mexican named Jose Castaneda by Court Order was injured so badly
by the judicial assault committed by Mister Stewart in his "Capacity"; that James Blume is depressed,
drinking heavily, and is in fear of his life, or well-being after the Assault on him in a Legal

6

Proceeding; but also when he saw the Court Clerk illegally change the date on the Court Stamp to the
7

wrong date on Exhibit 3#!

8
9

10

REMIDIES: The arrest and investigation of Mister William Stewart for a crime of Assault. under

II Penal Code §.220, and Batterv. under Pfn,al Code §242, in a Court of Law (Work Place Violence) by

11

throwing objects from the Bench (Losin1!Control) at the Complaintant or Plaintiffs (In Court) with

12

disregard for the Safety and Security of the Public connected to this Court Case GC045202, by the

13

Local Police in Burbank for this Work Place Crime that's recorded on Tape! An immediate
investigation by the Police, and the Judiciary Branch, and demand for his immediate termination or at

14

least a suspension or the removal of Mister William Stewart when he couldn't do his job, lost control,
15

and went "Postal" or was in Rage on the People he was sworn to serve and protect; and NOT to
16

17

assault them with their own Filings be thrown at them or in their direction to injure them and their
cases! Is that the new way of serving the People with justice???

18
19

CERTIFICATION: I certify and swear or affirm under the Penalty ofPetjury, under Penal Code §

20

118, Felony, that everything containing in this Legal Document to be true and correct to the best of

21

my knowledge; and even confirmed bv the Evidence of the Court Talles that "Recoded" this crime

22

in Progress. I realize my Life is "In Danger" for Whistle-Blowing on the dirty Justices in California
23
24

that sells decisions; but as a Marine, a former Police Officer, I can't in good conscience allow a crazy

25

on the Bench to remain as a public servant that may be dangerous and a threat to society by throwing

26

objects at the People or in their immediate direction! For undeniable proof, see and hear the Tapes by

27

the court to verifY the Crime in a Court of Law!

28
- 12 of 24 - with

10 Exhibits

CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND FORMAL CRIMINAL CHARGES, DEMAND FOR ARREST, CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION
ON THE CRIMINAL, WHISTLE-BLOWER
PROTECTION, RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST DIRTY JUDGES

1 Exhibit
2

3

1#, an Arrest form signed and dated to make it officiaL

Exhibit 2#, does NOT show, display, or prove James Blume, aka Jose Castaneda was there; when he
was because he was Assaulted!

4

5
6

Exhibit 3#, submitted by James Blume, for proof see lines 1-3, turned in on 11-23-2015; BUT A
FALSE DATE WAS "ST.~\1PED" OF 11-21-2015! This is Judicial Fraud, and demand for a Correct

7

date to prove I was in Court and assaulted by the Criminal on the Bench!

8

Exhibit 4#, shows we were on Calendar for position 12#! We were moved to position 1# to prove the

9

judge was "Lying in Wait" to assault us! For proof, if the Judge was "Neutral" and no Party made a
10

11

Motion to take "Cuts"; WHY WERE WE SET UP TO BE ASSUALTED!!!???

12

Exhibit 5#, dated 11-21-14, "No order was suhmitted bv Plaintiff" ... how, when we don't know who

13

was in Court of all the (3) Three Castaneda's used in this jurisdiction! We have o,-,e Jose Castaneda in

14

a Wheel Chair on the VL Order, You have a second ordered to be Castaneda, by James Blume,

15

USMC to be a Mexican named Jose Castaneda, and the third who is the true Jose Castaneda to

16

17

produce a Court Order for all Parties! I, refuse to make this order until I find out which Castaneda

18

was ordered to do this assignment as ordered by the Court!

19

Exhibit 6#, does Not reflect the "Whole Truth"; and when the Judge Assaulted a witness; the witness

20

Jose Castaneda refuse to return in fear of his Life and Well-Being by the unlawfully force and

21

criminal Act of Assault done in the Capacity of an Officer, violating Penal Code

§ 149. Color of Law.

a

22

II Felonv! All the Jose Castaneda's that were present when Mister Stewart "Assaulted Them" are afraid
23
24

25

to come back to the Courthouse in Burbank out of fear and Judicial Retaliation for making a criminal
arrest against him!

26
27
28
- 13 of 24 - with 10 ~xhibits
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND FORMAL CRIMINAL CHARGES, DEMAND FOR ARREST, CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION
ON THE CRIMINAL, WHISTLE-BLOWER
PROTECTION, RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST DIRTY JUDGES

1
2

3

·cr-~
(z;J JfUHe
L:c:J~~7rJsfJ?

~

.

James Blume, USMC Honorable, aka per

Court Order to be a Mexican named Jose Castaneda.

4

James Blume, USMC Hon as Jose Castaneda
5
6

DATED: January 31, 2015

7

James Blume
USMC Honorable
In Pro Per or Self
Represented

8
9
10

11
12
13

14 II cc:
15
16

17
18
19
20
21
22

Burbank Courthouse Presiding Judge pursuant to C.C.P. 398(a and c),
391.8.
(a) A vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order under
Section 391.7 may file an application
to vacate the prefiling order
and remove his or her name from the Judicial Council's list of
vexatious litigants subject to prefiling orders. The application
shall be filed in the court that entered the prefiling order, either
in the action in which the prefiling order was entered or in
conjunction
with a request to the presiding justice or presiding
judge to file new litigation under Section 391.7. The application
shall be made before the justice or judge who entered the order, if
that justice or judge is available. If that justice or judge who
entered the order is not available, the application
shall be made
before the presiding justice or presiding judge, or his or her
Designee
(c) A court may vacate a prefiling order and order removal of vexatious litigant's
name from the Judicial Council's list of vexatious litigants subject to pre-filing
orders upon a showing of amaterial change in the facts upon which the order was
granted and that the ends of justice would be served by vacating the order.

23
24
25
26

PLEASE BE ADVISED: Plaintiffs categorically deny, unequivocally, that we don't fit the
criteria of the Vexatious Litigant Statute enacted by the legislature. The misinterpretation of the law
was executed to silence us for exposing the Wide Systemic Court Corruption. For proof, investigate
our cases that includes abuse of power when we were sanctioned almost a million dollars on an Entry
of Default in BC402096? This proves Judicial Facilitation to steal from the people using the courts.

27

28
- 14 of 24 - with 10 Exhibit5
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND FORMAL CRIMINAL CHARGES, DEMAND FOR ARREST, CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION
ON THE CRIMINAL, WHISTLE-BLOWER
PROTECTION, RESTRAINING ORDER
AGAINST DIRTY JUDGES

B\)~~itNK
A-n

L~ AN\ELES POLICE DEPARTMENT

PRIVATE PERSON'S'ARREST

tllJ

Af:~

~~fttJftL-

S1ATEMENT FORM

PAGE NO. I TYPE OF REPORT

OR NO.

BOOKlNGNO.

\
PURSUANT

TO CALIFORNIA

~LUMl(}

M~ \

HAVE ARRESTED

OF PENAL CODE SECTION

A PUBLIC OFFENSE

,\ -"2--) -

I

PENAL CODE SECTION

-i

837 (AUTHORITY

~\

TO ARREST),

• A PRIVATE

PERSON,

%I~print

w':f:-LL4=.ltM

please print

(Section and

COMMITTED

STe,w

Tttle) " S e...Q..

IN MY PRESENCE

)ON

FOR VIOLATION

PrR...T

CD~ pU'~IVY
AT

~ v

vb~ k
IN

MAw t.h

S lJ'~ e..v-l \)Y'

c:.,T,

11-2~ ~JS'-'AT (Time) S€.~ TJtefS /

(Date)_

_TItfS

I HEREBY DEMAND THAT POLICE OFFICER(S>'_QF

OF

IS vlttJl-rul(

tD~

DIVISION

TA:-KE

CUSTODY OF, AND TRANSPORT
MY ARRESTEE TO A LOS ANGELES POLICE STATION
OR OTHER APPROPRIATE
LOCATION FOR BOOKING/PROCESSING.
I UNDERSTAND
THAT THE OFFICER(S) ARE ONLY TRANSPORTING
THIS PERSON AND COMPLETING
THE NECESSARY REPORTS. I WISH TO PROSECUTE AND AGREE TO COOPERATE

l.
*E X H t B 'T ~

FULLY AND APPEAR WHEN REQUIRED AT ALLSTAGES OF THE PROCEEDING~.
PLEASE READ BEFORE SIGNIWI
I have read and understand the above statement of arrest. The officers named above
have fuRy explained the procedures for a private person's arrest of this person in custody.

Arresting Person's Signature
Street Address
CitylZip Code
Phone Number
Date of Birth

06.0:no l071lrS)

h..&
(-S

2~ J

OY1C(\

Cft

,

0 D'l.-Cj

-

\3 ~I

at

nJ1GE.

Co (.9 ~

2..1

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
DATE:

DEPT. NCB A

01/23/15

HONORABLE

WILLIAM

D. STEWART

JUDGE

II

R. HERNANDEZ

DEPUTY CLERK

12
HONORABLE

ELECTRONIC

JUDGE PRO TEM

RECORDING

MONITOR

J. LARSEN, COURTROOM ASST.
Deputy Sheriff

8:301GC045202

none
Plaintiff

Reporter

JOSE CASTANEDA(X/PRO

Counsel

ESTATE OF FELICITAS CASTANEDA
VS
LAW FIRM OF JACK K. CONWAY

Defendant

-SA-w\"<-5 ~t.\JI"\~
- S~~
JACK K. CONWAY (X)

PER)

EJWt=~I;~.:t\:

Counsel

NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS:

MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO CORRECT AN INTENTIONAL
DISMISSAL OF CASE WITH PREJUDICE FOR AN ORDER TO
ATTORNEY, CONWAY TO RELEASE FILE
COURT'S TENTATIVE RULING: The Court's tentative
ruling is published to parties by posting on the
Court's website on the internet as follows:
MP: Plaintiffl
RP: Defendant,

Jose Casteneda
Law Firm of Jack Conway

RELIEF REQUESTED:
Order to correct an intentional dismissal of the
case with prejudice.
2. Orders directing attorneys 1 Jack Conway 1 Samuel
Pazi and other "Joiners" to explain their
involvement in a judicial conspiracy to obstruct
justicel
commit perjurYI
manipulate the code
sections, change orders, and corrupt judges.

1.

DISCUSSION:
This case arises from the Plaintiff's claim that the
Defendant engaged in legal malpractice. After the
Court granted the Defendant1s motion for a judgment
on the pleadings with ten days leave to amend, the
case was dismissed when the Plaintiff did not file
an amended complaint. A judgment for dismissal was
entered in this case on December 291 2010.

4-

1 of

5

DEPT. NCB A

COUNTY

Page

EXHIB\T

MINUTES ENTERED
01/23/15

~

2."

CL:2RX

;Sy.A"-"

13
26
27
12
19
18
20
25
7
21
1
14
4
17
86 1
24
22
3515
10
928
216
23

3*

1

-~
James Blume, USMC Honorable et. a1
and others Similarly Situated ...(JOINDER)
1242 3/4 N. Alexandria Avenue
L.A, Ca, 90029

WHISTLE-BLOWER CASE

(323)663-1397(Mes~es)

PER THE CONSTITUTION

Please Respond in Writing

&6f;t::r1.r~

~~

1'SO"1

'OD\)

kA.L(...
I&tIP

~l>U,.

OC>

TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, BURBANK COURTHOUSE ET. AL.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. FORMAL COMPLAINT. ORDER TO COMPEL. TRUTHFUL
AFFIDA

VL...:t

ON JUDICIAL RACKETEERING OPERATIONS TO STEAL AND JOINDER

James Blume, USMC Honorable ... aka Jose

II Castaneda by Court Order to be a Mexican!
Plaintiff and Complaintant,
Vs.

J

]

j
]
]
]

Connected Case(s)BC453664,"&" BC470365.
BD317479/ Bl68653, D.A.456083-0910 AI
02 FLOOO8670, 08U16492, 10U025481
BV028409,BC464832, BC470365,
] BC473026, llU03997, BC464831,
] BC477065, B 16FR02 I GA36, LARD
] 274072/ et at..BC485710/ 14 CV-3179

]
]
]

Jack Conway, et. a1

]
]

Defendant(s) and the Patsy & Fall Guy!

1. Complex Case

(Unlimited)

]

l]
]

2. Consolidation Demanded

]

]
]
]

3. Jury Trial

]

4. Filer's Bill of Rights

File, Tracking. or Case No.: GC 045202.
BC470365, & BC453664 et. al ••..

A. CROSS-COMPLAINT AND COUNTERCLAIM FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY
TRIAL DEMANDED FOR THE CNIL
RIGHTS VIOLATIONS TO STEAL.
B. VIOLATIONS OF PUBLIC POLICY,
PUBLIC TRUST, FUDICIARY DUTY,
CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY, & JUDICIAL
MISDIRECTION TO COMMIT JUDICIAL
FRAUD TO STEAL FROM THE PEOPLE.
C. JUDICIAL RACKETEERING &
CORRUPTION WITH FACILITATION

]

]

]
]

5. ADA Advocate Requested
6. Whistle-Blower Protection Demanded

l

D.
ACTION
RELIEF23, 2015
Hearing
Date: OF
JANUARY
Hearing Judge:

E X H 181 T

Mister Stewart W. D.

Declaratory and Summary Judgment Demanded On
Pre- Trial Issues, and demand for a D.A. Referral.

1-50 Issues, Complaints, Charges Inclusive )

]
)
]

]

}
- 1 -

of

37

Type Case: Contract, Fraud Upon Court,
Conspiracy, Perjury, Obstruction of Justice,
Violations of T", 8th, 14th Amendment Rights. Judicial
Racketeering, and Facilitation for Profit
Pursuant to CA Rules of Court, Rule 311(b)

; Verification

on Page

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, CROSS-CLAIM,
COUNTERSUIT,
JURY TRIAL, VIOLATION OF PUBLIC POLICY,
PUBLIC TRUST, VIOLATION OF CONSTITUTION
AMENDMENTS OF THE 8TH, 7TH, & 14TH AMENDMENTS,
JUDICIAL FRAUD, JUDICIAL RACKETEERING
OPERATION, CORRUPTION WITH FACILITATION.

http://ww w.lacourt.org/tentati

veRul ingNetluj!ResultPopup.aspx

!~

r-~"~'-<
,-,\.II .

DEPARTMENT A LAW AND MOTION RULINGS

~

\

');.

-.

"-,'--V-"'"

•..•

'--~~_~~""""""'.,,,.'''''.,.=

Case Number: GC045202

.•.••••.
'''=:;;~'''.,,.,,..,,,.''"''-,

Hearing Date: January 23, 2015

r-

Dept: A

Estate of Castaneda v Conway

4*

\t

MOTION TO CORRECT DISMISSAL
Calendar: 12
Case No: GC045202
Date': 1/23/15
\

\. MP: Plaintiff; Jose Casteneda L +'1':. I ~L \ll'l~
RP: Defendant, Law Firm of Jack Conway

E XH I BIT -.
I

RELIEF REQUESTED:
1. Order to correct an intentional dismissal of the case with prejudice.
2. Orders directing attorneys, Jack Conway, Samuel Paz, and other "Joiners" to explain their
involvement in a judicial conspiracy to obstruct justice, commit perjury, manipulate the code
sections, change orders, and corrupt judges.
DISCUSSION:
---:; This case arises
After the Court
~
leave to amend,
A judgment for

from the Plaintitrs claim that the Defendant engaged in legal malpractice.
granted the Detendant's motion for a judgment on the pleadings with ten days
the case was dismissed when the Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint.
dismissal was entered in this case on December 29,2010.

--7 This hearing

concerns the motions of the Plaintiff. Jose Castaneda for relief. However, Jose
Castenada was declared a vexatious litigant on March 28, 2012 (see opposition papers,
exhibit B). The Court issued a pre-filing order under CCP section 391.7 that required Jose
Casteneda to obtain leave of Court before filing any new litigation.
The vexatious litigant statutes enacted in CCP section 391 to 391.7 are designed to curb
misuse ofthe court system by those persistent and obsessive litigants who, repeatedly
litigating the same issues through groundless actions, waste the time and resources of the
court system and other litigants. Shalant v. Girardi (2011) 51 Cal. 4th 1164, 1169. The ~
..} constant suer becomes a serious problem to others because by clogging court calendars, he
causes real detriment to those who have legitimate controversies to be determined and to the
taxpayers who must provide the courts. Fi.rst Western Development Corp. v. Superior Court
(1989) 212 Cal. App. 3d 860,868.
The vexatious litigant statutes provide courts and noiwexatious litigants with two distinct and
complementary sets of remedies. In pending litigation, CCP sections 391.1 to 391.6 permit a

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
DATE:

11/21/14

HONORABLE

WILLIAM

DEPT. NC A

D. STEWART

JUDGEII

HONORABLE

JUDGE

J. LARSEN,

COURTROOM

S. BOURNE

DEPUTY CLERK
ELECTRONIC

PRO TEM

RECORDING

MONITOR

ASST.

#20

Deputy Sheriffll

30 amlGC045202

NONE
Plaintiff

Reporter

JOSE CASTANEDA

(X)

Counsel

ESTATE OF FELICITAS CASTANEDA
VS
LAW FIRM OF JACK K. CONWAY

Defendant
Counsel

JACK K. CONWAY

(X)

NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS:

MOTION OF PLAINTIFF, JOSE CASTANEDA, FOR AN ORDER
FROM NOV. 1, 2014 TO NOV. 21, 2014 RE: PROOF OF
MAILING TO PREVENT ATTORNEY, LISA M. MAC CARLEY TO
CONTINUE TO LIE TO THE COURT AS IN CASE GC042105
BEFORE JUDGE DEVANON AND IN CASE GC047300 BEFORE
JUDGE GLENNON
MOTION OF PLAINTIFF, JOSE CASTANEDA, FOR AN ORDER TO
CORRECT AN INTENTIONAL DISMISSAL OF CASE WITH
PREJUDICE TO CHANGE TO WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR AN
ORDER TO ATTORNEY, CONWAY TO RELEASE FILE
The matter

is called

-

for hearing.

-----} IThe Court orders the matter placed
order is submitted by plaintiff.

off calendar.

No

--

Page

1 of

1

DEPT. NC A

MINUTES ENTERED
11/21/14
COUNTY CLERK

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
DATE:

DEPT.

01/23/15

HONORABLE

WILLIAM

D. STEWART

JUDGE II

R. HERNANDEZ

NCB A

DEPUTY CLERK

12
HONORABLE

JUDGE

J. LARSEN,

COURTROOM

ELECTRONIC

PRO TEM

RECORDING

MONITOR

ASST.
Deputy Sheriffll

8:301GC04S202

none
P~mtiff

Reporter

JOSE CASTANEDA(X/PRO

PER)

Counsel

ESTATE OF FELICITAS CASTANEDA
VS
LAW FIRM OF JACK K. CONWAY

Defendant
Counsel

JACK K. CONWAY (X)

NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS:

MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO CORRECT AN INTENTIONAL
DISMISSAL OF CASE WITH PREJUDICE FOR AN ORDER TO
ATTORNEY, CONWAY TO RELEASE FILE
COURT'S TENTATIVE RULING: The Court's tentative
ruling is published to parties by posting on the
Court's website on the internet as follows:
MP: Plaintiff,
RP: Defendant,

Jose Casteneda
Law Firm of Jack Conway

RELIEF REQUESTED:
1. Order to correct an intentional dismissal of the
case with prejudice.
2. Orders directing attorneys, Jack Conway, Samuel
Paz, and other "Joiners" to explain their
involvement in a judicial conspiracy to obstruct
justice, commit perjury, manipulate the code
sections, change orders, and corrupt judges.
DISCUSSION:
case arises from the Plaintiff's claim that the
Defendant engaged in legal malpractice. After the
Court granted the Defendant's motion for a judgment
on the pleadings with ten days leave to amend, the
case was dismissed when the Plaintiff did not file
an amended complaint. A judgment for dismissal was
entered in this case on December 29, 2010.

--1 IThis

Page

1 of

5

DEPT. NCB A

MINUTES ENTERED
01/23/15
COUNTY CLERK

Declaration of Jack K. Conway
2

In Support of Motion
for .Judgment

3

Of Dismissal

4
5

I, .JACK K. CONWAY, DECLAREAND STATE that I am a

611defendant in the above entitled action, the authorized agent for the
711Defendant, Law Firm of Jack K. Conway, and if called upon to testify to
811the following facts I could and would do so competently and my
911testimony would be derived from personal knowledge.
10 II
1111

nJte

l

~f

0 f~t f ,NO
e fA.V (1-Rce.t. •
On September 24, 2010, I appeared in Department "R" of the

(S e

e."

'((\

\

12//

above entitled court to urge the Court to grant the motion for judgment

1311

on the pleadings on the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, the motion

141/

which I had prepared, filed and served upon the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff

151/

also appeared in court. The Court took the motion under submission and

16/1

on the same date mailed a minute order to all parties granting the motion

1711

and granting the Plaintiff ten days to amend his pleading.

18/1

minute order is attached to this Declaration and designated as Exhibit A.

191/

The said minute order, "Ruling on Submitted Matter" was received in my

A

copy of the

20II Office on September 25, 2010.
21

To date, November 3, 2010, I have not received the amended

22
23/1

complaint.

2411

indication that an amended complaint responsive to the motion for

25

I have examined the superior court website and there is no

IIjudgment on the pleadings has been filed.

26

27/1
28

I declare under penalty
of perjury pursuant
to the laws of the
NOTICE/MOTION
FOR JUDGMENT
OF DISMISSAL

00028
6

State of ,California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on

211

November 3, 2010 at San Marino, California

3

4
5
6

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

25
26
27
2811

NOTICE/MOTION

FOR JUDGMENT

OF DISMISSAL

00028
7

e- ..•

SUPERIOR COURT D'r )CALIFORNIA,
DATE:

-c
COUNTY oF'r\J$
ANGELES

DEPT. NE R

09/24/10

HONORABLE

C. EDWARD SIMPSON

JUDGEIl

HONORABLE

P. MOREJON

DEPUTY CLERK

JUDGE PRO TEM

ELECTRONIC RECORDING MONITOR

,,~P. REYNOSO
A['TENDANT

Deputy

Sheriffll

11:30 amlGC045202

NONE

Reporter

Plaintiff
Counsel

ESTATE OF FELICITAS CASTANEDA
VS
THE LAW FIRM OF JACK K.

Defendant
Counsel

(NO APPEARANCES)

Tht.

t111JlQ

vJ~O

~

-h-t:e-~ w'~lf vt'f\lI

~fv>-reJ-?

NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS:

NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS:

RULING ON SUBMITTED

MATTER

Motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted as
unopposed for the reasons stated in the moving papers.
Plaintiff is granted 10 days to amendi defendant.
10 days thereafter to respond.
Case Management Conference currently set for
October 5, 2010 is continued to November 3, 2010
at 8:30 a.m. in this department.
The clerk is to give notice.
CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF MAILING!
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER
I, the below named Executive Officer/Clerk of the
above-entitled court, do hereby certify that I am not
a party to the cause herein, and that this date I
served Notice of Entry of the above minute order of
09/24/2010 upon each party or counsel named below by
depositing in the united States mail at the courthouse
in Pasadena, California, one copy of the
original entered herein in a separate sealed envelope
for each, addressed as shown below with the postage
thereon fully prepaid.
Date: 09/24/2010

Page

1 of

2

DEPT. NE R

MINUTES ENTERED
09/24/10
COUNTY CLERK

000283

·.
SUPERIOR COURT~-'
DATE:

CALIFORNIA, COUNTY O~S

ANGELES
DEPf. NE R

09/24/l0

HONORABLE

C. EDWARD SIMPSON

JUDGEII

HONORABLE

P.

MOREJON

DEPUTY CLERK

JUDGE PRO TEM

P. REYNOSO
ATTENDANT

ELECTRONIC RECORDING MONITOR

DeputySheriffll NONE

11:30 amlGC045202

Reporter

Plaintiff

Counsel

ESTATE OF FELICITAS

CASTANEDA

VS

THE LAW FIRM OF JACK K.r

(NO APPEARANCES)

L

~

Defendant
Connsel

NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS:

John A. Clarke,

Executive

Officer/Clerk

By:
Patricia

Morejon

JOSE CASTANEDA
1377 Rutan Way
Pasadena, CA, 91104
JACK K. CONWAY
Law Offices of Jack K. Conway
2460 Huntington Drive
San Marino, CA 91108-2643

Page
_____

..

.

--'--

.

2 of
._.

2

DEPT.

MINUTES ENTERED
09/24/10
COUNTY CLERK

NE R
"__

I

I

000284