You are on page 1of 67

did not

necessarily mean
that the debtors
were allowedto
pay as and when
they could. If this
was the intention
of the parties,
they should have
so indicated in

the PN.However,
it did not reflect
any such
intention. The
Note expressly
stipulated that
the debt should
be
amortizedmonthl
y in installments

of P11,579 for
twelve
consecutive
months. While
the specific date
on which
eachinstallment
would be due
was left blank,
the Note clearly

If this .provided that each installment should be payable each did not necessarily mean that the debtors were allowedto pay as and when they could.

was the intention of the parties. The Note expressly stipulated that .However. it did not reflect any such intention. they should have so indicated in the PN.

While the specific date on which .579 for twelve consecutive months.the debt should be amortizedmonthl y in installments of P11.

eachinstallment
would be due
was left blank,
the Note clearly
provided that
each installment
should be
payable each
did not
necessarily mean

that the debtors
were allowedto
pay as and when
they could. If this
was the intention
of the parties,
they should have
so indicated in
the PN.However,
it did not reflect

any such
intention. The
Note expressly
stipulated that
the debt should
be
amortizedmonthl
y in installments
of P11,579 for
twelve

the Note clearly provided that each installment . While the specific date on which eachinstallment would be due was left blank.consecutive months.

If this was the intention of the parties. .should be payable each did not necessarily mean that the debtors were allowedto pay as and when they could.

it did not reflect any such intention.However. The Note expressly stipulated that the debt should be .they should have so indicated in the PN.

amortizedmonthl y in installments of P11. While the specific date on which eachinstallment would be due .579 for twelve consecutive months.

the Note clearly provided that each installment should be payable each did not necessarily mean that the debtors were allowedto .was left blank.

it did not reflect any such intention.pay as and when they could. If this was the intention of the parties.However. The . they should have so indicated in the PN.

Note expressly stipulated that the debt should be amortizedmonthl y in installments of P11. While .579 for twelve consecutive months.

the Note clearly provided that each installment should be payable each .the specific date on which eachinstallment would be due was left blank.

did not necessarily mean that the debtors were allowedto pay as and when they could. If this was the intention of the parties. they should have so indicated in .

it did not reflect any such intention.However. The Note expressly stipulated that the debt should be amortizedmonthl y in installments .the PN.

the Note clearly .579 for twelve consecutive months. While the specific date on which eachinstallment would be due was left blank.of P11.

provided that each installment should be payable each did not necessarily mean that the debtors were allowedto pay as and when vv .

they could. The .However. they should have so indicated in the PN. If this was the intention of the parties. it did not reflect any such intention.

579 for twelve consecutive .Note expressly stipulated that the debt should be amortizedmonthl y in installments of P11.

the Note clearly provided that each installment . While the specific date on which eachinstallment would be due was left blank.months.

If this was the intention .should be payable each did not necessarily mean that the debtors were allowedto pay as and when they could.

of the parties. The Note expressly stipulated that the debt should . they should have so indicated in the PN. it did not reflect any such intention.However.

be amortizedmonthl y in installments of P11.579 for twelve consecutive months. While the specific date on which eachinstallment .

would be due was left blank. the Note clearly provided that each installment should be payable each did not necessarily mean that the debtors .

they should have so indicated in the PN. If this was the intention of the parties.However. it did not reflect any such .were allowedto pay as and when they could.

579 for twelve consecutive .intention. The Note expressly stipulated that the debt should be amortizedmonthl y in installments of P11.

the Note clearly provided that each installment . While the specific date on which eachinstallment would be due was left blank.months.

should be payable each did not necessarily mean that the debtors were allowedto pay as and when they could. If this was the intention of the parties. .

The Note expressly stipulated that the debt should be .they should have so indicated in the PN. it did not reflect any such intention.However.

amortizedmonthl y in installments of P11. While the specific date on which eachinstallment would be due .579 for twelve consecutive months.

was left blank. the Note clearly provided that each installment should be payable each did not necessarily mean that the debtors vvv .

However. it did not reflect .were allowedto pay as and when they could. they should have so indicated in the PN. If this was the intention of the parties.

579 for . The Note expressly stipulated that the debt should be amortizedmonthl y in installments of P11.any such intention.

While the specific date on which eachinstallment would be due was left blank.twelve consecutive months. the Note clearly .

provided that each installment should be payable each did not necessarily mean that the debtors were allowedto pay as and when .

they should have so indicated in the PN.However. The Note expressly . it did not reflect any such intention. If this was the intention of the parties.they could.

579 for twelve consecutive months.stipulated that the debt should be amortizedmonthl y in installments of P11. While the specific date .

on which eachinstallment would be due was left blank. the Note clearly provided that each installment should be payable each .

If this was the intention of the parties. they should have so indicated in .did not necessarily mean that the debtors were allowedto pay as and when they could.

However.the PN. The Note expressly stipulated that the debt should be amortizedmonthl y in installments . it did not reflect any such intention.

While the specific date on which eachinstallment would be due was left blank.579 for twelve consecutive months.of P11. the Note clearly .

provided that each installment should be payable each did not necessarily mean that the debtors were allowedto pay as and when they could. If this .

it did not reflect any such intention.was the intention of the parties.However. they should have so indicated in the PN. The Note expressly stipulated that .

While the specific date on which .the debt should be amortizedmonthl y in installments of P11.579 for twelve consecutive months.

the Note clearly provided that each installment should be payable each did not necessarily mean .eachinstallment would be due was left blank.

it did not reflect .that the debtors were allowedto pay as and when they could. they should have so indicated in the PN.However. If this was the intention of the parties.

579 for twelve . The Note expressly stipulated that the debt should be amortizedmonthl y in installments of P11.any such intention.

consecutive months. While the specific date on which eachinstallment would be due was left blank. the Note clearly provided that each installment .

If this was the intention of the parties.should be payable each did not necessarily mean that the debtors were allowedto pay as and when they could. .

they should have so indicated in the PN. The Note expressly stipulated that the debt should be .However. it did not reflect any such intention.

While the specific date on which eachinstallment would be due .579 for twelve consecutive months.amortizedmonthl y in installments of P11.

was left blank. the Note clearly provided that each installment should be payable each did not necessarily mean that the debtors were allowedto .

pay as and when they could.However. it did not reflect any such intention. they should have so indicated in the PN. If this was the intention of the parties. The .

Note expressly stipulated that the debt should be amortizedmonthl y in installments of P11. While .579 for twelve consecutive months.

the Note clearly provided that each installment should be payable each .the specific date on which eachinstallment would be due was left blank.

If this was the intention of the parties.did not necessarily mean that the debtors were allowedto pay as and when they could. they should have .

However. it did not reflect any such intention. The Note expressly stipulated that the debt should be .so indicated in the PN.

579 for twelve consecutive months. While the specific date on which eachinstallment .amortizedmonthl y in installments of P11.

the Note clearly provided that each installment shouldid not necessarily mean that the debtors were allowedto .would be due was left blank.

If this was the intention of the parties.However. they should have so indicated in the PN.pay as and when they could. it did not reflect any such .

579 for twelve . The Note expressly stipulated that the debt should be amortizedmonthl y in installments of P11.intention.

consecutive months. the Note clearly provided that . While the specific date on which eachinstallment would be due was left blank.

each installment should be payable each d be payable each vvvvv .