Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Communalities
Initial
Extractio
n
1.000
.958
Income in thousand
Satisfaction Level with
1.000
.893
bKash
Probability to switch
1.000
.905
another services
Extraction Method: Principal Component
Analysis.
Component Matrixa
Component
1
2
Income in thousand
.216
.955
Satisfaction Level with
.928
.180
bKash
Probability to switch
-.842
.443
another services
Extraction Method: Principal Component
Analysis.
a. 2 components extracted.
Regression
Model
Sum of
Squares
7589300427.
Regression
768
29697924957
Residual
2.232
30456855000
Total
0.000
ANOVAa
df
Mean Square
7589300427.
768
16498847198
18
.457
1
Sig.
.506b
.460
19
Model
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized
Standardized
Coefficients
Coefficients
B
Std. Error
Beta
-96934.246 236604.193
-.410
.687
.158
.678
.506
Sig.
(Constant)
1
Respondent's
6091.176
8981.049
Age
a. Dependent Variable: Income in thousand
Sig.
Multiple Regression
sModel
Regression
Residual
Total
Sum of
Squares
4.404
16.396
20.800
ANOVAa
df
2
17
19
Mean
Square
2.202
.964
2.283
.132b
Model
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized
Standardized
Coefficients
Coefficients
B
Std. Error
Beta
4.528
1.817
-.119
.070
-.372
2.492
-1.706
.023
.106
.000
1.541
.142
(Constant)
Respondent's Age
1
Income in
2.776E-006
thousand
a. Dependent Variable: Usage Rate
.336
Oneway ANOVA
ANOVA
Respondent's Age
Sum of
Squares
Between
Groups
Within Groups
Total
df
Mean
Square
59.217
10
5.922
145.333
204.550
9
19
16.148
.367
Correlations
Descriptive Statistics
Mean
Std.
Deviation
Duration Of Using
bKash
Usage Rate
1.35
.671
20
1.60
1.046
20
Sig.
.933
Sig.
Correlations
Duration Of Usage Rate
Using bKash
Pearson
1
Correlation
Duration Of Using
bKash
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
20
Pearson
.885**
Correlation
Usage Rate
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
N
20
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
.885**
.000
20
1
20
T-Test
Respondent's Age
Income in
thousand
One-Sample Statistics
N
Mean
Std.
Deviation
20
26.15
3.281
20 62350.00
Respondent's Age
Income in
thousand
126609.335
Std. Error
Mean
.734
28310.708
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0
Sig. (2Mean
tailed)
Difference
df
35.642
19
.000
2.202
19
.040
62350.000
3095.01
121604.99
Model
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized
Standardized
Coefficients
Coefficients
B
Std. Error
Beta
1.457
.259
(Constant)
1
Income in
2.291E-006
thousand
a. Dependent Variable: Usage Rate
.000
.277
Sig.
5.631
.000
1.224
.237
From the above table we found that our calculated value is 1.224 and the tabulated value is
2.093. Here, tabulated is greater than calculated value so we will accept it.
F-Test
Model
ANOVAa
df
Sum of
Squares
Regression
1.599
1
1
Residual
19.201
18
Total
20.800
19
a. Dependent Variable: Usage Rate
b. Predictors: (Constant), Income in thousand
Mean
Square
1.599
1.067
F
1.499
Sig.
.237b
From the above table we found that our calculated value is 1.499 and the tabulated value is 4.41.
Here, we found that our calculated value is less than tabulated value so we will accept it.
Chi-square Test
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
20
.717
20
.635
Pearson Chi-Square
16.000a
Likelihood Ratio
17.279
Linear-by-Linear
.285
1
.593
Association
N of Valid Cases
20
a. 33 cells (100.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .10.
From the above table we found that our calculated value is .717 and the tabulated value is 5.991
with df 20 and 0.05 significance. Here, the tabulated value is greater than calculated value so we
will accept it.