You are on page 1of 7

DISCRIMINATION AGAINST BANGLADESHI HINDUS---62 YEARS OF SOLITUDE.

SINCE THE CREATION OF PAKISTAN BANGLADESHI HINDUS HAVE BEEN FACING DISCRIMINATION. PAKISTAN
WAS ESTABLISHED ON TWO NATION THEORY THAT HINDUS & MUSLIMS ARE TWO SEPARATE NATIONS.
BENGALI MUSLIMS WERE IN FORE FRONT OF PAKISTAN MOVEMENT UTTERING THE URDU SLOGAN” HAAT
MAY BIRI MU MAY PAAN LORDKE LENGE PAKISTAN”.IN ENGLISH “WE HAVE BEATLE LEAF IN MOUTH , &
CIGARETTE IN HAND, WE ARE FIGHTING FOR PAKISTAN LAND”.( WITHIN SEVEN MONTHS OF PAKISTAN
CREATION EAST PAKISTAN MUSLIMS STARTED FIGHT AGAINST URDU , WITHIN 25 YEARS THEY DIVIDED
PAKISTAN BY ESTABLISHING BANGLADESH, WITHIN 3¾ YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE ARCHITECT OF
BANGLADESH BANGABANDHU SHEIKH MUJIBUR RAHMAN WAS KILLED AS HE HAD A STRONG DESIRE FOR
GOOD RELATION WITH INDIA,ANTI INDIAN RULE HAS BEEN STARTED IN BANGLADESH,THEN BANGLADESHI
INTELLECTUALS HAVE ESTABLISHED A BENGALI CALENDER WHICH IS NOT FOLLOWED BY BENGALI HINDUS,
NOW THEY ARE FIGHTING FOR OWN BENGALI LANGUAGE. & CULTURE. FIGHTING IS A CONTINUOUS PROCESS
HERE).
THE LAWS & EVENTS CHRONOLOGICALLY ABOUT DISCRIMINATION
JUST AFTER CREATION OF PAKISTAN, WITHIN 1948, 02 MILLION HINDU LEFT FROM EAST PAKISTAN. THEY
WERE THE MOST RICH, EDUCATED & CULTURAL PERSONS OF THIS LAND.AS MUSLIMS OF THIS LAND WERE
WHOLE HEARTED SUPPORTER OF PAKISTAN MOVEMENT & THERE HAD BEEN RIOTS IN DIFFERENT DISTRICTS
OF BENGAL THEY FELT INSECURE & LEFT THIS LAND FOR AN UNCERTAIN FUTURE.THEY LEFT THEIR
VALUABLE PROPERTIES HERE.THEN THE NEW PAKISTAN GOVERNMENT PASSED THE "REQUISITION OF
PROPERTY ACT" (ACT XIII OF 1948), WHICH WAS SUPPOSED TO LAST FOR THREE YEARS. GIVING THE POWER
FOR TAKEOVER OF ABANDONED PROPERTY "NEEDFUL FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE STATE," THIS ACT HAS
CONTINUED AND EVOLVED INTO SOMETHING ABUSED BY CITIZENS AND STATE. THE RELATIVES OF
MIGRATED PEOPLE WHO WERE LIVING IN THIS LAND THEY WERE DEPRIVED OF THEIR PROPERTIES.
IN 1950, SERIOUS RIOTS BROKE OUT IN DIFFERENT CITIES OF EAST PAKISTAN. THOUSANDS OF HINDUS WERE
KILLED IN DIFFERENT DISTRICTS . IN THIS PART OF BENGAL FROM BRITISH PERIOD RIOTS ARE ONE SIDED.
ALL TIMES HINDUS ARE ATTACKED BY MUSLIM RIOTERS. 0N 12 TH FEBRUARY 1950 AT BHAIRAB BRIDGE
MAXIMUM HINDUS OF A TRAIN WERE KILLED BY BIHARI RIOTERS, IN A TRAIN BETWEEN DHAKA
NARAYANGANJ RAIL ROUTE HINDUS WERE KILLED BY DHAKAI –KUTTIS, AFTER REACHING DHAKA STATION
THE HINDUS WERE SAVED BY A GROUP OF YOUNG MEN LED BY SHEIKH MUJIBUR RAHMAN.( TO TAKE
REVENGE NO MUSLIMS WERE KILLED IN THE TRAINS OF WEST BENGAL WHICH WAS HAPPENED IN PUNJAB
BETWEEN SIKHS & MUSLIMS ). BENGALI HINDUS WHO DID NOT LEAVE IN 1947 & AFTER, HAD BEEN STARTED
TO LEAVE THIS COUNTRY. IT WAS MUCH MORE THAN PERIOD OF 1947-1949. FROM 1947 TO 1963 ONE CRORE
HINDUS LEFT THIS COUNTRY. WEST BENGAL WAS SERIOUSLY BURDENED WITH HINDU REFUGEES FROM EAST
PAKISTAN. BASICALLY THE TOWN STRUCTURE OF CALCUTTA WAS BROKEN DOWN AT THAT PERIIOD. THE
RICH & EDUCATED HINDUS OF EAST PAKISTAN WERE DWELLING IN SLUMS & RAILWAY STATIONS OF WEST
BENGAL. WORLD FAMOUS SCIENTIST PROFESSOR MEGHNAD SAHA TOLD TO PRIME MINISTER JAWAHARLAL
NEHERU IN INDIAN PARLIAMENT ON 27 NOVEMBER 1952 “NOW TAKE THE CITY OF DACCA, THE BIGGEST CITY
IN EASTERN PAKISTAN, IT HAD A POPULATION OF 200,000 BEFORE PARTITION, 70 PERCENT WERE HINDUS –
140,000. THEY OWNED 80 PER CENT OF THE HOUSES THERE. NOW THERE ARE ONLY 5,000 HINDUS LEFT THERE
AND THEY HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY FORCED OUT OF THEIR HOUSES IN DACCA. I KNOW IT, BECAUSE I COME
FROM DACCA” . MR. MUNTASIR MAMUN WHO HAS WRITTEN MANY BOOKS ABOUT DHAKA CITY, NEVER
MENTIONED THIS CHAPTER.EAST PAKISTAN LOST THEIR VALUABLE TEACHERS , PHILOSOPHERS, DOCTORS ,
ENGINEERS, SCIENTISTS. MR. ABDULLAH ABU SAYEED IS A SUPPORTER OF PAKISTAN MOVEMENT BUT HE
WROTE “ THE VACUUM CREATED BY THE EXODUS OF HINDU TEACHERS WAS NEVER FILLED UP”. A NEW LAW
"EAST BENGAL EVACUEES ACT" (1951) WAS PASSED, THAT DEFINED ANY RESIDENT OF EAST BENGAL WHO
LEFT FOR INDIA DUE TO "COMMUNAL DISTURBANCE OR FEAR THEREOF" AS AN "EVACUEE" WHOSE LAND
COULD BE APPROPRIATED. FOR THIS LAW AGAIN BENGALI HINDUS WHO WAS THEN ALSO LIVING IN THIS
LAND LOST THEIR PROPERTIES.
IN 1964 AGAIN RIOTS BROKE OUT IN DIFFERENT DISTRICTS OF EAST PAKISTAN, HUNDREDS OF HINDUS WERE
KILLED.(SHEIKH MUJIBUR RAHMAN PLAYED A VITAL ROLE TO STOP THIS MASSACRE). AGAIN EXODUS OF
HINDUS HAD BEEN STARTED. THEN AN ORDINANCE PASSED NAMED"EAST PAKISTAN DISTURBED PERSONS
REHABILITATION ORDINANCE" (1964). THIS NEW ORDINANCE RESTRICTED TRANSFER OF "IMMOVABLE
PROPERTY OF MINORITY COMMUNITY" WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE AUTHORITIES. THIS, IN EFFECT,
MEANT THAT ANY HINDU PERSON WISHING TO LEAVE EAST PAKISTAN FOR ANY REASON WOULD NOW FACE
SIGNIFICANT BARRIERS , EVEN THE LAWFUL SALE OF THEIR PROPERTY -- THEY WOULD HAVE NO CHOICE BUT
TO "ABANDON" THEIR LAND.HINDUS WERE LEAVING THIS LAND ABANDONING THEIR PROPERTIES.
IN PAKISTAN PERIOD BEFORE INDIA-PAKISTAN WAR AT 1965 THE GOVT. LAWS BY WHICH BENGALI HINDUS
LOST THEIR PROPERTIES WERE
THE EAST BENGAL (EMERGENCY) REQUISITION OF PROPERTY ACT (XIII OF1948),
THE EAST BENGAL EVACUEES (ADMINISTRATION OF PROPERTY) ACT (VIII OF1949),
THE EAST BENGAL EVACUEES (RESTORATION OF POSSESSION) ACT (XXII OF1951),
THE EAST BENGAL EVACUEES (ADMINISTRATION OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY) ACT(XXIV OF 1951),
THE EAST BENGAL PREVENTION OF TRANSFER OF PROPERTY AND REMOVAL OF DOCUMENTS AND RECORDS
ACT OF 1952,
THE PAKISTAN (ADMINISTRATION OF EVACUEES PROPERTY) ACT (XII OF 1957),
THE EAST PAKISTAN DISTURBED PERSONS(REHABILITATION) ORDINANCE (NO 1 OF 1964)
IN 1965 INDIA PAKISTAN WAR WAS STARTED.AS HINDUS WERE ALWAYS CONSIDERED AS ENEMY OF PAKISTAN
THEN PAKISTAN GOVT PASSED DIFFERENT LAWS & ORDINANCE TO SUPPRESS HINDUS .THESE WERE
THE DEFENCE OF PAKISTAN ORDINANCE [NO. XXIII OF 6 SEPTEMBER, 1965
THE DEFENCE OF PAKISTAN RULES OF 1965
THE ENEMY PROPERTY [CUSTODY AND REGISTRATION] ORDER OF 1965
THE WAR ENDED IN ONLY 17 DAYS, AFTER THE TASHKENT DECLARATION, BUT THE "ENEMY PROPERTY
ORDER" (1965) WOULD CONTINUE FOR DECADES. THE SIGNAL IMPORTANCE OF THIS LAW, WHICH CONTINUED
THE TRAJECTORY OF VARIOUS ORDINANCES SINCE 1947, IS SHOWN BY THE MANNER IN WHICH IT HAS
SURVIVED EACH CHANGE OF GOVERNANCE. PAKISTAN WAS UNDER A MILITARY STATE OF EMERGENCY FROM
1965 TO 1969. BUT ON THE DAY THE EMERGENCY WAS LIFTED, THE GOVERNMENT PASSED "ENEMY PROPERTY
(CONTINUANCE OF EMERGENCY PROVISIONS) ORDINANCE" (ORDINANCE 1 OF 1969). AGAIN, FOLLOWING THE
1971 LIBERATION OF BANGLADESH, THIS LAW MIRACULOUSLY SURVIVED VIA "LAWS OF CONTINUANCE
ENFORCEMENT ORDER" (1971).
IN INDEPENDENT BANGLADESH ON 26TH MARCH OF 1972 BANGLADESH (VESTING OF PROPERTY AND ASSETS)
PRESIDENT'S ORDER NO. 29 REPLACED FORMER ENEMY PROPERTY ACT. IN 1974 THE ACT WAS PRACTICALLY
DECLARED VOID BY PROMULGATING 'THE ENEMY PROPERTY (CONTINUANCE OF EMERGENCY PROVISIONS)
(REPEAL) ACT XLV. BUT IMMEDIATELY AFTER WORDS ANOTHER DECLARATION NAMED THE VESTED AND
NON-RESIDENT PROPERTY (ADMINISTRATION) ACT XL VI OF 1974 BROUGHT THE ABOVE ACT INTO FORCE.
BUT BANGLADESHI HINDUS THOUGHT THAT THE LAWS WOULD BE REPEALED BECAUSE THEY WERE
BASICALLY THE MOST TORTURED COMMUNITY DURING THE LIBERATION WAR. PAKISTANI REGIME USED TO
TELL THAT JOY BANGLA MOVEMENT OF SHEIKH MUJIB WAS BASICALLY ORGANIZED BY HINDUS.
BANGLADESH HAD SECULARISM IN THEIR CONSTITUTION BUT IT WAS CONTINUING THE LAW WHERE
HINDUS WERE CONSIDERED AS ENEMY OF THIS COUNTRY. HINDUS WERE LOOSING PROPERTIES
INCREASINGLY THAN PAKISTAN PERIOD. BANGABANDHU COULD NOT REPEAL THIS LAW BECAUSE AT THAT
TIME THE LAND GRABBERS WERE VERY MUCH POWERFUL WITHIN AWAMI LEAGUE. I HEARD THAT SOME
HINDU LEADERS TRIED TO MOTIVATE HINDUS NOT TO RETURN IN BANGLADESH AFTER INDEPENDENCE IF
THE LAW WAS NOT REPEALED. THEN INDIAN GOVT. ASSURED THEM TO TAKE STEPS TO REPEAL THE LAW. WE
CAN REMEMBER THE LETTER OF GENERAL JACKOB ,THEN CHIEF OF EASTERN COMMAND, TO PRIME
MINISTER MRS. INDIRA GANDHII. HE REQUESTED MRS GANDHI TO TAKE INITIATIVES ABOUT HINDU
PROPERTY AND TRANSIT. HE CAUTIONED HER “ AFTER FEW DAYS IT WILL NOT BE POSSIBLE.”. FORE SIGHTED
MR. JACKOB CALCULATED THE SENTIMENT OF BANGLADESHI MUSLIM ELITES. J.N. DISKKIT WHO WAS HIGH
COMMISSIONER OF INDIA WROTE IN HIS BOOK “ WHEN I TOLD TO PRIME MIINISTER MRS INDHIRA GANDHI
ABOUT THE STATUE OF HER WHICH WAS GOING TO BE ESTABLISHED IN DHAKA , WITH SMILES IN FACE SHE
TOLD THAT AFTER FEW DAYS THEY WOULD BREAK IT”. INDIAN POLITICAL LEADERS & BUREAUCRATS HAD
THE IDEA ABOUT THE SENTIMENT OF BANGLADESHI MUSLIM ELITES BUT THEY NEVER DID ANYTHING FOR
BANGLADESHI HINDUS. INDIAN CENTRAL CABINET HAS A RESOLUTION THAT THERE IS NO REFUGEE
PROBLEM IN WEST BENGAL BUT EVERY YEAR AVERAGE TWO LAKH HINDUS(200000) ARE MISSING FROM
BANGLADESH.WE CAN ALSO REMEMBER THE COMMENT OF AMERICAN AMBASSADOR MR. BOSTAR, WHO
WROTE TO WASHINGTON THAT HE WAS ASTONISHED TO SEE, BANGLADESHIS FROM GRASSROOTS TO
HIGHEST LEVEL, ALL WERE ANTI INDIAN. BUT SEVERAL THOUSAND INDIAN SOLDIERS DIED DURING
INDEPENDENCE WAR OF BANGLADESH, THEY TRAINED THE FREEDOM FIGHTERS OF THIS COUNTRY. WEST
BENGAL HINDUS HELPED THEM WHOLE HEARTEDLY BY FORGETTING ALL THE KILLINGS & TORTURE IN
EAST PAKISTAN. BANGLADESHI MUSLIM ELITES FORGOT ALL THE HELPS JUST AFTER INDEPENDENCE.
FAMOUS WRITER AKTARUZZAMAN ELIAS WROTE IN HIS DIARY ”THIS KIND OF MIDDLE CLASS IS NOT FOUND
IN ANYWHERE OF THIS WORLD. THEY ARE GREEDY AND CAN DO ANYTHING DESTRUCTIVE FOR THEIR
INTERESTS,FOR THEIR NAME & FAME”. I THINK THE MAIN PROBLEMS OF BANGLADESHI MIDDLE CLASS LIES
IN THEIR DEVELOPMENT PROCESS.(IN A RECENT ARTICLE PUBLISHED IN PROTHOM ALO ON NOVEMBER 0R
DECEMBER-2009, EX. CHIEF JUSTICE MR HABIBUR RAHAMAN GLORIFIED THE DEVELOPMENT OF
BANGLADESHI MUSLIMS AFTER 1947). THEY HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED VERY UNETHICALLY BY DRIVING AWAY
THE HINDUS & BY LOOTING THEIR PROPERTIES. JUST AFTER INDEPENDENCE THEY WERE AFRAID OF
LOOSING THEIR PROPERTIES . THEY THOUGHT THAT HINDUS MIGHT RETURN WITH POWER AS INDIA PLAYED
A VITAL ROLE IN OUR INDEPENDENCE.SO THEY BECAME TOTALLY ANTI AWAMI LEAGER & ANTI INDIAN.
SOME OF THE ECONOMISTS SAYS THAT NO LAND- REFORM WAS DONE IN BANGLADESH. BUT THERE HAS
BEEN A LAND- REFORM FOR MANY YEARS & IT HAS BEEN DONE COMMUNALLY & BY LOOTING . WHEN
PAKISTAN WAS ESTABLISHED MAXIMUM PROPERTIES OF THIS COUNTRY WERE BELONGS TO HINDUS ( AT
LEAST 80%) &NOW BY LOOTING THEIR PROPERTIES MAXIMUM PROPERTIES BELONGS TO MUSLIMS. LOOTING
WAS ENCOURAGED BY GOVT AT DIFFERENT TIMES. SO BANGLADESHI ELITES ARE SUCH UNETHICAL. MR.
MOZAFFAR AHMED WHO IS INVOLVED IN ANTI CORRUPTION MOVEMENT FOR A TRANSPARENT
BANGLADESHI ,NEVER MENTIONED THIS CORRUPTION OF OUR ELITES.MR. ABDULLAH ABU SAYEED IS
ENGAED IN MOVEMENT FOR ENLIGHTENED MAN,NEVER MENTIONED THIS DARK CHAPTER OF OUR COUNTRY.
ON MARCH 23, 1974, THE HIGH COURT RULED THAT NO FURTHER PROPERTY COULD BE ENLISTED AS VESTED
PROPERTY. HOWEVER, THIS RULING CONTINUED TO BE IGNORED IN PRACTICE FOR THE NEXT THREE
DECADES. AFTER THE TAKE OVER THE POWER BY ZIAUR RAHMAN ORDER 92 OF 1976 WAS ISSUED REPEALING
ORDER 46 OF 1974. IN 1974 A NEW OPPRESSIVE 'ENEMY PROPERTY'(CONTINUANCE OF EMERGENCY
PROVISIONS) (REPEAL) (AMENDMENT) ORDINANCE (NO. 93)1976 WAS PROMULGATED. IT WAS GIVEN
RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT FOR 23RD MARCH 1974.IN 1974 ACT, THE TRANSFER OF VESTED PROPERTY WAS MADE
SUBJECT TO THE CONSENT OF THE OWNER. BUT ZIAUR RAHMAN'S GOVERNMENT CANCELLED THE PROVISION
AND THE GOVERNMENT GOT ABSOLUTE POWER TO CONTROL OR ADMINISTER PROPERTIES. IT WAS A GROSS
VIOLATION OF SUCCESSION LAW OF THE MINORITY COMMUNITIES AND THE SUCCESSORS OF MIGRATED
RELIGIOUS MINORITIES LOST ALL THEIR RIGHTS ON VESTED PROPERTY. WITH THE CIRCULAR OF 23 MAY 1977
ON THE MINISTRY OF LANDS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF BANGLADESH WHICH EMPOWERED THE TEHSILDARS
(A 3RD CLASS GOVT. EMPLOYEE) TO FIND OUT THE LANDS SUITABLE FOR ENLISTING AS ENEMY
PROPERTY.SINCE THERE WAS A PROVISION FOR REWARDING THE SUCCESSFUL TEHSILDARS THEY FELT
ENCOURAGED TO BRING MANY UNDISPUTED PROPERTIES OF THE HINDUS UNDER THIS LIST. ZIA PERIOD WAS
THE WORSE PERIOD FOR BANGLADESHI HINDUS. HINDUS WERE LOOSING THEIR PROPERTY AT THE HIGHEST
RATE.
ACCORDING TO PROFESSOR. BARAKAT, THE GREATEST APPROPRIATION OF HINDU PROPERTY TOOK PLACE
IMMEDIATELY AFTER INDEPENDENCE DURING THE FIRST AWAMI LEAGUE GOVERNMENT [1972-75] AND
DURING THE FIRST PERIOD OF RULE OF THE BANGLADESH NATIONALIST PARTY [1976-1980]. BUT NO
POLITICAL PARTY ORGANIZED ANY MOVEMENT FOR THE DISGRACED MINORITIES. BANGLADESHI LEFTISTS
ARE BONA FIED ANTI INDIAN. CPB WAS LITTLE BIT LIBERAL ABOUT INDIA.EVEN CPB ALSO DID NOT ORGANIZE
ANY MOVEMENT THEY LIKE SOME OTHERS ONLY SIGNED IN STATEMENTS . THEN ADVOCATE AMINUL HOQUE,
WHO LATER BECAME ATTORNEY GENERAL FORMED A COMMITTEE AGAINST THIS LAW.
THEN GENERAL ERSHAD CAME TO POWER BY A PEACEFUL COUP ON 1982. PRESIDENT ERSHAD MADE A
DECLARATION THAT NO FURTHER PROPERTY WOULD BE ENLISTED AND CONFISCATED AS ENEMY PROPERTY.
FROM 1965 TO 1984 ORDER NO. 45 OF 1974 OF AL GOVERNMENT AND ERSHAD'S DECLARATION OF 1984 MAY BE
CONSIDERED TWO STEPS TO REDUCE THE LEVEL OF OPPRESSION. BUT AFTER THE 8TH AMENDMENT
INTRODUCING ISLAM AS STATE RELIGION THESE WENT IN VAIN. AFTER THE 8TH AMENDMENT THE
INSECURITY OF THE RELIGIOUS MINORITIES WAS INCREASED. IN 1989, 1990, LARGE SCALE ATTACKS ON
RELIGIOUS MINORITIES WERE MADE AND LANDS WERE CONFISCATED AS ENEMY PROPERTY.
AFTER A DECADE OF ANTI ERSHAD MOVEMENT BNP CAME TO POWER IN 1991 BY A ELECTION . LIKE ALL
OTHER MOVEMENT BANGLADESHI HINDUS WERE INVOLVED IN THIS MOVEMENT. MR. SHAH MOAZZEM
HOSSAIN, THEN POWERFUL MINISTER OF ERSHAD’S CABINET,MADE A COMMENT IN A MEEETING ‘’ JARA
MARA GECHE TAADER NAAMGULO PORUN , OPAR THEKE DADARA ESHE ANDOLON KORE DIE JACHCHE.”. IN
ENGLISH “ PLEASE READ THE NAMES WHO DIED, THEIR BROTHERS OF WEST BENGAL ARE DOING THIS
MOVEMENT” HE MADE THIS COMMENT AFTER A KILLING IN CHITTAGONG IN WHICH POLICE FIRED SHEILKH
HASNA’S JIP, AT LEAST 30 PEOPLES WERE KILLED.THERE WERE SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF HINDUS. BUT BNP IS
ALWAYS A ANTI HINDU PARTY. 1N 1992 AFTER DEMOLISHING BABRI MOSQUE IN INDIA, THE HINDU AREAS OF
EVERY DISTIRICTS IN BANGLADESH WERE ATTACKED BY MUSLIM RIOTERS. MAXIMUM OF THE RIOTERS
WERE BNP ACTIVISTS.ONLY FOR THE OBJECTION OF BEGUM ZIA, IT WAS NOT EVEN DISCUSSED IN
PARLIAMENT. IN PARLIAMENT WHEN AN AL MP ( SO FAR I REMEMBER HE WAS POWERFUL LEADER OF AL MR.
TOFAEL AHMED) TOLD TO SPEAKER THAT A HINDU GIRL OF HIS AREA BECAME PREGNANT BECAUSE OF RAPE.
THEN BNP SECRETARY GENERAL ABDUS SALAM TALUKDER WAS JOKING IN PRESENCE OF PRIME MINISTER
KHALEDA ZIA “ MAY BE THE GIRL’S FERTILITY IS TOO MUCH.”ON NOVEMBER 4, 1993 THE THEN BNP
GOVERNMENT MADE ANOTHER DECLARATION FOR SCRUTINY OF THE CENSUS LIST OF THE ENEMY
PROPERTY. THIS DECLARATION WAS ANOTHER INITIATIVE TO USE THE 'ACT' TO HARASS AND OPPRESS THE
RELIGIOUS MINORITIES IN BANGLADESH.
AL CAME TO POWER IN 1996 BUT NOT WITH ABSOLUTE MAJORITY.99% OF HINDUS ALWAYS VOTE FOR AWAMI
LEAGUE. THEN AL GOVT.ISSUED TWO CIRCULARS FROM THE MINISTRY OF LAND ON NOVEMBER, 14, 1996 THE
GIST OF WHICH IS -1. (A) NOT TO ENLIST ANY MORE PROPERTY AS ENEMY VESTED PROPERTY.1. (B) WITHOUT
PRIOR PERMISSION OF THE LAND MINISTRY NO MEMBER OF HINDU,BUDDHIST, CHRISTIAN COMMUNITIES
SHALL BE EVICTED OUT. 2. IN LAND SURVEY THE LAND PROPERTY OF RELIGIOUS MINORITIES SHOULD BE
PROPERLY ASSESSED.
THE 22ND SESSION OF THE NATIONAL PARLIAMENT PASSED THE "VESTED PROPERTY RETURN ACT 2001."
WHILE THIS LAW WAS A MILESTONE IN BEGINNING THE RETURN OF HINDU OWNED PROPERTY TO THEIR
RIGHTFUL OWNERS, THERE WERE SEVERAL KEY FLAWS: THE ACT COVERED ONLY LAND VESTED UP TO
FEBRUARY 1969. THIS MEANT ALL HINDU LAND APPROPRIATED FROM 1969 TO 2001 (AND BEYOND) WAS NOT
COVERED BY THIS ACT. IF THE LAND HAD BEEN PERMANENTLY TRANSFERRED TO STATUTORY OR OTHER
ORGANIZATION, AND RETURN OF LAND WAS IMPOSSIBLE, THERE WAS NO PROVISION FOR FINANCIAL
COMPENSATION. THE ORIGINAL OWNER OR HEIR IS REQUIRED TO HAVE "CONTINUOUSLY" RESIDED IN
BANGLADESH, AN ABSURD CLAUSE THAT ALLOWS MANY LEGAL CLAIMANTS TO BE EXCLUDED. THE ORIGINAL
OWNER ALSO HAD TO SUBMIT CLAIMS WITHIN 90 DAYS OF PUBLICATION OF THE LIST OF RETURNABLE
PROPERTIES. FINALLY, HINDU WOMEN HEIRS WERE EXCLUDED FROM INHERITANCE IN CASE OF DEATH OF
MALE OWNERS, A CONVENIENT "ACCOMMODATION" TO "HINDU RELIGIOUS PERSONAL LAW."
THE MINORITY COMMUNITIES OPPOSED THE LAW. AT LAST IN 2001 BNP CAME TO POWER .AFTER BNP CAME
TO POWER, HINDUS OF DIFFERENT DISTRICTS WERE SERIOUSLY ATTACKED BY BNP ACTIVISTS. IT WAS MUCH
MORE SERIOUS THAN OF 1992. THE BNP ACTIVISTS ACCUSED HINDUS AS BONA FIED AWAMI LEAGER .SO THEY
ATTACKED HINDU AREAS,THEY KILLED MANY HINDUS, DAMAGED THEIR PROPERTIES, THEY RAPED HINDU
GIRLS. WE CAN REMEMBER THE CRYING OF A HINDU MOTHER ,WHICH WAS PUBLISHED IN NEWSPAPERS.
DURING GANG RAPING SHE WAS CRYING & TELLING.” PLEASE DO IT SLOWLY,MY DAUGHTER IS UNDER AGED”
IN NOVEMBER 2002, THE NEW BNP LED ALLIANCE GOVERNMENT PASSED AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2001 ACT,
WHICH ESSENTIALLY GUTTED ALL ENFORCING POWER. ESPECIALLY HARMFUL WAS THE CLAUSE THAT GAVE
THE GOVERNMENT "UNLIMITED TIME" IN WHICH TO PUBLISH THE LIST AND ENFORCE RETURN OF
PROPERTY. SINCE THE PASSAGE OF THIS AMENDMENT, NOT A SINGLE LIST HAS BEEN PUBLISHED, NOR ANY
RETURN PROCESS INITIATED IN THE LAST YEARS.BUT HINDUS WERE LOOSING THEIR PROPERTIES.

ON JANUARY 11, 2007 BNP LOST POWER. A NEW TYPE OF CARE TAKE GOVT. TOOK POWER.THEY WERE TAKING
STEPS AGAINST CORRUPTION. THEY ARRESTED DIFFERENT POLITICAL LEADERS ,BUREAUCRATS, LAND
GRABBERS. BUT THEY DID NOT TAKE ANY STEP ABOUT LAND GRABBING OF HINDU COMMUNITY.MAY BE THIS
IS NOT CONSIDERED AS CORRUPTION IN BANGLADESH.ON NOVEMBER 6, 2008, THE HIGH COURT DIVISION OF
THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH DELIVERED ITS RULE NISI UPON THE GOVERNMENT ON THE ENEMY
PROPERTY [CONTINUANCE OF EMERGENCY PROVISION] [REPEAL] ACT 1974 AND SUBSEQUENTLY
PROMULGATED ARPITA SAMPATTY PROTAPYAN AIN 2001 AND CIRCULAR, ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS.
PRESENT AL GOVT CABINET NOW AGAIN MAKING A LAW TO RETURN HINDU PROPERTIES WHICH IS
SERIOUSLY OPPOSED BY THE HINDU COMMUNITY . EVEN THOUGH AL MP LIKE VETERAN PARILAMENTARIAN
MR. SURANJIT SENGUPTA IS OPPOSING THE LAW FOR GROSS VIOLATION OF SUCCESSION LAW OF THE
MINORITY.THE GOVT.ALSO ADMINISTERING THE FIGURES OF ENEMY PROPERTY WHICH WAS SUBMITTED
DURING BNP. GOVT. BY LAND MINISTRY IN 2004. IT IS 6,43,140 ACRES. GRABBERS GRABBED UP MORE THAN TWO
THIRDS OF ENEMY PROPERTY AS THE GOVERNMENT LOST CONTROL OVER THE LAND. BUT THE
BANGLADESHI NEWSPAPER DAILY SANGBAD(21ST MARCH 1977) ALLEGED THAT AT THAT POINT IN TIME,
ACCORDING TO THE GOVERNMENT'S OWN FIGURES, 702,335 ACRES OF CULTIVABLE LAND AND
22,835 HOMES WERE LISTED AS ENEMY PROPERTY.PROFESSOR ABUL BARAKAT WHO IS A DECISION
MAKER OF AWAMI LEAGUE IS CONFIDENT ABOUT HIS FIGURE 26,00000(26 LAKH) ACRES.
CONSEQUENCES OF THE LAWS
THE MAIN PROBLEM OF BANGLADESHI HINDU COMMUNITY IS THAT THEY FEEL INSECURE FOR THESE KIND
OF LAWS TARGETTING THEIR PROPERTIES.THEY HAVE BEEN LOOSING PROPERTIES SINCE 1947& LEAVING
THIS COUNTRY SILENTLY. DR BARKAT' SHOWED THAT SINCE 1948, 75% OF THE LAND OF RELIGIOUS
MINORITIES IN EAST PAKISTAN AND SUBSEQUENT BANGLADESH HAD BEEN CONFISCATED THROUGH
PROVISIONS OF THE ACTS. ACCORDING TO DR. BARAKAT THE HINDU COMMUNITY HAVE LOST 26 LAKH
ACRES OF LAND FROM 1965 TO 2006.BECAUSE OF VESTED( ENEMY)PROPERTY ACT. HIS BOOK TITLED
‘DEPRIVATION OF HINDU MINORITY IN BANGLADESH: LIVING WITH VESTED PROPERTY’ WAS LAUNCHED ON
14 MAY 2008 AT THE LGED AUDITORIUM, DHAKA. ACCORDING TO THE BOOK THE PRICE OF THE LAND AND
OTHER MOVABLE PROPERTIES LOST BY 12 LAKH HINDU FAMILIES HAS BEEN ESTIMATED AT TK 355,000.00
CRORE.WHICH IS 57.73% OF BANGLADESH GDP (2008-09) AT PRESENT MARKET PRICE. BEING DEPRIVED OF
THEIR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS SINCE 1947 THEY HAVE BEEN LEAVING THIS COUNTRY. RESEARCH SHOWS
THAT IN 1947 THE PROPOSITION OF THE RELIGIOUS MINORITIES WAS 29.7% OF THE TOTAL POPULATION.
BEFORE 1971 IT WAS 19.6%, IN THE 1974 CENSUS IT WAS 14.6% AND IN 1991 IT WAS 11.7%. THE AVERAGE NUMBER
OF FAMILY MEMBER IN BANGLADESH OF MUSLIM, HINDU, BUDDHIST AND CHRISTIAN IS 5.7, 5.5, 5.9, 5.4
RESPECTIVELY. THE STATISTICS SHOWS THAT 1 CRORE 25 LAKH PEOPLE MIGRATED IN THE PAKISTAN PERIOD
AND 1 CRORE IN THE BANGLADESH PERIOD-FROM 1971 TO THE PRESENT. EVEN GOVERNMENT STATISTICS
ADMIT THAT THE NUMBER IS AROUND 50 LAKH. THE WEEKLY HOLIDAY SHOWED IN 1991 THAT FROM 1974 TO
1991 29 LAKH 50 THOUSAND PEOPLE LEFT TTHE COUNTRY. C.C. H.R.B STATISTICS SHOWS THAT SINCE 1947 2
CRORE HINDU CITIZENS LEFT THE COUNTRY. IF THE BUDDHISTS AND CHRISTIANS ARE ADDED ITWILL BE 2
CRORE AND 25 LAKH.( I THINK, WEST BENGAL LOST HER GLORY AFTER THE DECADE OF 50’ MAINLY BECAUSE
OF THIS EXODUS FROM THIS LAND & SUBSEQUENT POLITICAL SCENARIO FOR THIS AFTER 1947)
ROLE OF BANGLADESHI MUSLIM ELITES , POITICIANS, INTELLECTUALS & GOVT. BUREAUCRATES
THE ANOTHER MAJOR PROBELEM OF HINDU COMMUNITY IS THE ROLE OF BANGLADESHI MUSLIM ELITES.
THE SECULAR INTELLECTUALS ALSO WRITES ABOUT HINDU COMMUNALISM. THE HINDUS LOST SUCH A VAST
AMOUNT OF LAND BY DIFFERENT LAWS, FOR MENTAL TORTURE THEY HAVE BEEN LEAVING THIS COUNTRY
SILENTLY, BUT THEY DON’T WRITE ABOUT THESE.THEY ALWAYS WRITE ABOUT UPROOTED PALESTINIAN ,
BOSNIAN OR OTHER MUSLIMS BUT NOT ABOUT UPROOTED NEIGHBOUR HINDUS BECAUSE OF THIR PAN ISLAM
SENTIMENT.ONLY WRITER TASLIMA NASREEN PROTESTED ABOUT THIS DISCRIMINATION BY HER BOOK
“LAJJA”. FOR THIS REASON SHE HAD TO LEAVE THIS COUNTRY. STILL THIS BRAVE WOMAN IS SUFFERING ,
STILL SHE IS HOMELESS.THERE WAS NO SIGNIFICANT RESEARCH ABOUT THESE LAWS UPTO 1997 , BEFORE.
PROFESSOR BARAKAT. THE EDITORS OF ALL TYPE OF NEWSPAPERS DO NOT GIVE IMPORTANCE ABOUT THE
PROBLEMS OF HINDU COMMUNITY. THE ELECTRONIC MEDIA BASICALLY MUM ABOUT THE PROBLEMS. IF 1000
ACRES OF LAND HAD LOST BY MUSLIMS OF WEST BENGAL ALL INTELLECTUALS WOULD HAVE SEEN IN ROAD,
THERE WOULD HAVE PLENTIFUL OF TALK SHOWS, COLUMNS ABOUT THE HINDU COMMUNALISM IN BENGAL
FROM BRITISH PERIOD. IF ONE READ THE BOOKS/ COLUMNS OF SECULAR WRITERS ,HE/SHE WILL SEE THE
JUGALBANDY OF SECULARISM & PAKISTANISM. THEY HAVE NO IDEA THAT NO BODY IN THIS WORLD CAN
SYNCHRONIZE THESE TWO. THE INTELLECTUALS FROM PRO SECULAR TO PRO ISLAMI TERRORIST ALWAYS
SEE HINDU COMMUNALISM BUT THEY DON’T SEE ANY MUSLIM COMMUNALISM. ACCORDING TO THEM HINDU
ZAMINDARS(LANDLORDS) EXPLOITED THE FARMERS OF THIS COUNTRY. WERE MUSLIM ZAMINDARS GOOD?
THEY DON’T WRITE THAT HINDU ZAMINDARS ESTABLISHED MANY SCHOOL COLLEGES IN THIS COUNTRY, BUT
MUSLIM ZAMINDARS WERE NOT INTERESTED IN ESTABLISHING SCHOOL-COLLEGES, THEY HAD INTERESTS TO
ESTABLISH MOSQUES. THEY DON’T WRITE THAT KOLKATA-A WHOLLY HINDU MAJORITY CITY, HAD A
ELECTED MUSLIM MAYOR BEFORE 1947. AT THAT TIME TOTAL WORLD WAS UNDER COMMUNAL POLITICS.
CAN THEY FIND A BLACK MAYOR IN EUROPE-AMERICA AT THAT TIME? CAN THEY IMAGINE A HINDU MAYOR
OF DHAKA CITY IN NEXT 100 YEARS? EVEN THOUGH AWAMI INTELLECTUALS LIKE SAYED HOQUE--MUNTASIR
MAMUN GANG HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN CREATING ANTI INDIAN SENTIMENTS. SPECIALLY THEY ARE
AGAINST HINDUS OF WEST BENGAL. THEY ALWAYS WRITE THAT WEST BENGAL PEOPLES DON’T BUY THEIR
BOOKS. SO THEY STOPPED SELLING OF WEST BENGAL BOOKS IN EKUSHE BOOK- FAIR. ARE THESE
INTELLECTUALS WRITING ANYTHING SPECIAL THAT THE WEST BENGAL PEOPLES WHO ARE HUNDRED
YEARS ADAVANCE IN EVERY ASPETS OF LIFE THAN US WILL PURCHASE THEIR BOOK?. I THINK MAXIMUM OF
BANGLADESHIS WHO WRITE, NOVELS, POEMS, POLITICAL/LITERARY COLUMNS IN HIGHLY CIRCULATED
NEWS PAPERS/MAGAZINES IN DHAKA ARE NOT ELIGIBLE TO WRITE IN THE NEWSPPAPERS/MAGAZINES OF A
URBAN TOWN IN WEST BENGAL.
LET US SEE OTHER SIDE WHO PROCLAIMED THEM AS NEUTRAL. “PROTHOM ALO”-HIGHEST CIRCULATED
DAILY OF BANGLADESH, WERE ELECTING “BENGALI SCIENTIST OF MILLENIUM” IN THE YEAR 2000. THE
COLUMNIST WAS SUCH TYPE OF STUPID THAT HE/PROTHOM ALO ELECTED F.R KAN AS THE “BENGALI
SCIENTIST OF MILLENIUM”. HE WROTE ABOUT JAGDISH CHANDRA BASU, SATYENDRA NATH BOSE, MEGHNAD
SAHA. HE WROTE THAT BECAUSE HE IS THE DESIGNER OF WORLD TALLEST BULIDING, THERE IS A STATUE OF
HIM IN CHICAGO TOWN, SO HE IS THE BENGALI SCIENTIST OF MILLENIUM. F.R KHAN IS A GREAT ARCHITECT
NO DOUBT. IS HE COMPARABLE WITH SIR BASU WHO IS DECLARED AS ONE OF INVENTOR OF RADIO BY
IEEE,WHO IS CONSIDERED BY WESTERN SCIENTIST AS A SCIENTIST 50 YEARS AHEAD OF HIS TIME, A BUST OF
WHOM IS ESTABLISHED IN CHRIST COLLEGE OF CAMBRIGE UNIVERSITY BY THE SIDE OF CHARLES DARWIN. IS
MR. KHAN IS COMPARABLE WITH PROFESSOR BOSE WHO IS FATHER OF BOSE-EINISTINE STATISTICS. THE
PARTICLE WHICH CARRY FORCES NAMED AS BOSON AFTER HIS NAME. IN LHC OF CERN THE SCIEINTISTS ARE
FINDING HIGGS-BOSON PARTICLE WHICH IS A SEVERAL BILLION DOLLAR RESEARCH PROJECT. FOR
INVENTING BOSE-EINSTINE CONDENSATE ONE SCIENTIST IS HONOURED WITH NOBLE PRIZE. IS MR. KHAN
COMPARABLE WITH PROFESSOR MEGHNAD SAHA WHO IS CONSIDERED AS THE FATHER OF ASTRO PHYSICS
FOR HIS FAMOUS” SAHA EQUATION”?SEVERAL TIMES HIS NAME WAS IN SHORT LIST FOR NOBLE PRIZE. BUT
THE NEUTRAL COLUMNIST/PAPER CONSIDERED F.R KHAN AS MUSLIM. SO HE/PROTHOM ALO ELECTED HIM.
MR JAFAR IQBAL IS CONSIDERED AS THE MOST ETHICAL MAN AMONG BANGLADESHI PROFESSORS.WHEN I
READ HIS BOOK “EKTUKHANI BIGGHAN”, I WAS TOTALY DISHEARTENED. HE DID NOT WRITE THE NAME OF
THESE THREE SCIENTISTS FOR A SINGLE TIME. IF ONE WRITES INTRODUCTION TO PARICLE PHYSICS HE HAS
TO WRITE NAME OF BOSE, BECAUSE PARTICLE PHYSICS STARTS WITH FARMION & BOSON. HE
INTENTIONALLY OMITTED THIS NAME BECAUSE PROFESSOR BOSE WAS WEST BENGAL BORNED HINDU & HE
WAS INSPIRED TO WRITE THIS BOOK BY DR. ANISUZZAMAN WHO IS A BLIND SUPPORTER OF PAKISTAN
MOVEMENT.IN THE DAILY BHORER KAGAJ( BEFORE PUBLICATION OF PROTHOM ALO) MR. ZAFAR IQBAL
WROTE A COLUMN WHERE HE WROTE “BENGALI MUSLIM PRACTICES ISLAM.--THE GREATEST RELIGION OF
THE WORLD.WHY ARE THEY SO MUCH BACKWARD? BANGLADESHIS ARE VERY MUCH BRILLIANT”. ALL THE
INTELLCTUALS OF BANGLADESH WRITES THIS KIND OF COLUMN. I HAVE A QUESTION TO THEM, “WITHOUT
GOOD TEACHER, WITHOUT READING, BY ONLY DOING CIRCUMCISION (MUSULMANI) CAN A MAN BE
BRILLIANT?”(THESE PEOPLES THINK CIRCUMCISION AS A PANACEA. THEY ALWAYS ADVISE TO DO
CRCUMCISION & TELLS “HOW SCIENTIFIC IS ISLAM!) WHY MUSLIMS OF MALAYSIA, INDONESIA ARE SO MUCH
BACKWARD? WHY 80-90% BUSINESS/PROPERTIES OF THESE COUNTRIES BELONGS TO NON-MUSLIMS?.
AWAMI INTELLECTUALS LIKE SYED SHAMSUL HOQUE ,MR .MUNTASIR MAMUN, MR. MUSTAFA NURUL ISLAM,
MR.SHAMSUZZAMAN KHAN, MR. BORHANDDIIN KHAN JAHANGIR,HISTORIAN MR. ANWAR HOSSAIN -----------,
ARE ALL SUPPORTERS OF PAKISTAN MOVEMENT. THE WRITERS WHO PROCLAIMED THEM AS NEUTRAL SUCH
AS MR. HUMAYUN AHMED, ,MR. JAFAR IQBAL,MR IMTIAZ AHMED, MR IMDADUL HOQUE MILON,MR. ASIF
NAZRUL,MR ABUL MOMEN, DR MOZAFFAR AHMED, JUSTICE HABIBUR RAHMAN,HISTORIAN MR. SIRAJUL
ISLAM ------- ARE ALSO SUPPORTERS OF PAKISTAN MOVEMENT. EX POWERFUL SECRETARY & ADVISOR MR.
AKBAR ALI KHAN WHO WAS A VALIANT FREEDOM FIGHTER IS ALSO A BLIND SUPPORTER OF PAKISTAN
MOVEMENT. ACCORDING TO THEM FOR DEVELOPMENT OF BENGALI MUSLIMS PAKISTAN MOVEMENT WAS
NECCSSARY. THEY DON’T UNDERSTAND THAT FOR THIS MOVEMENT THEY LOST THEIR VALUABLE TEACHERS,
PHILOSOPHERS, ADVOCATES, DOCTORS ENGINEERS, SCIENTISTS. LOOK AROUND THE WORLD ,HOW
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES ARE HUNTING FOR THESE KIND OF PEOPLES FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD. THE
BRILLIANT PEOPLES HAD BEEN DRIVEN AWAY FROM THIS LAND FOR PAKISTAN MOVEMENT BUT THESE
INTELLECTUALS ARE SAYING THAT IT WAS A CORRECT MOVEMENT. BECAUSE THEY ARE COMMUNAL MEN. I
HAVE A QUESTION TO THEM ” IS IT A MATTER OF GREAT SIN(KABIRA GUNAH) TO BECOME HIGHLY EDUCATED
& TO REMAIN ILITERATE OR SEMI LITERATE IS A HOLY TASK(CHOWAB)?”.MR. SHOWKAT OSMAN WROTE IN
HIS DIARY THAT DRIVING AWAY THE HINDUS WAS A GREAT SIN.( HE DIDN’T TELL THIS PUBLICLY MAY BE HE
WAS AFRAID OF THESE INTELLECTUALS). I THINK. FOR THIS 99.9999% BANGLADESHI INTELLECTUALS DON’T
KNOW HOW TO THINK. THEY HAD BEEN BORN & BROUGHT UP WITHOUT GOOD TEACHERS ,WITHOUT GOOD
FAMILY & SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT. FROM THE BOYHOOD THEY LEARNED TO BLAME INDIA & HINDUS FOR
THEIR BACKWARDNESS. SO THEY ARE ALWAYS ANTI INDIAN.
THESE INTELLECTUALS WRITE THAT BANGLADESH IS A COUNTRY OF COMMUNAL HARMONY ,THIS LAND HAS
A HISTORY OF COMMUNAL HARMONY FOR THOUSAND YEARS. BASICALLY THESE INTELLECTUALS HAVE NO
FEELINGS FOR DISGRACED MINORITIES OF BANGLADESH. THEY HAVE NO RESPECT TO RELIGIOUS FEELINGS
OF HINDU COMMUNITY. FOR THIS REASON THEY HAVE ESTABLISHED A BENGALI CALENDAR WHICH IS NOT
FOLLOWED BY HINDU COMMUNITY.BENGALI CALENDAR REFORM COMMITTEE WAS FORMED DURING THE
REIGN OF AUTOCRAT GENERAL ERSHAD, THE CALENDAR WAS INTRODUCED AT BEGUM ZIA’S PERIOD IN 1992
0R 1993. BUT AS THE REFORM TABLET HAD A ANTI WEST BENGAL SMELL ALL BRAND OF BANGLADESHI
INTELLECTUCALS ACCEPTED IT IMMEDIATELY. THESE INTELLECTUALS HAVE NO FEELING THAT BY OLD
BENGALI CALENDAR/PANJIKA THE DATE OF PUJA, & DATE OF HINDU MARRIAGE CEREMONY ARE FIXED. THE
HINDUS DON’T FOLLOW BENGALI CALENDAR ONLY ON NEW YEAR DAY BY EATING PANTAA ELISH. THEY
FOLLOW BENGALI CALENDAR/PANJIKA WHOLE YEAR BY DOING EKADOSHIR, ASTAMIR, CHATURDASHIR ,
UPABAS AND BY MANGAL JATRA, SHUVA PANCHAMI ETC. FOR THE ROLE OF BANGLADESHI INTELLECTUALS
THE ONLY SECULAR FESTIVAL OF BENGALIS IS NOW A COMMUNAL FESTIVAL EVEN THOUGH THE LEFTISTS
DID NOT OPPOSE THIS CALENDAR AS THEY ARE BONAFIED ANTI INDIAN( NOW CPB ALSO).THE THINKING OF
BANGLADESHI LEFTISTS ARE THE PECULIAR COCKTAILS OF MARXISM & PAKISTANISM. MR. ANU MOHAMMAD
& MR. M.M AKASH WHO ARE NOW THEORTICIAN OF ANTI AWAMI LEAGUE MOVEMENT, ARE THIS TYPE OF
THINKERS. MR ANU MOHAMMAD & HIS ALLIES ARE THE BONA FIED ANTI INDIAN & ANTI AWAMI LEAGER
SINCE 1972. BNP ACTIVISTS ARE RAPING HINDU GIRLS, THEIR LEADERS WERE JOKING ABOUT RAPED HINDU
GIRL IN PARLIAMENT BUT THE LEFISTS INTELLECTUALS LIKE MR AKASH & MR ANU ARE FINDING PRO-
LIBERATION FORCES WITHIN BNP. THEY DON’T CALL BNP AS FUNDAMENTALIST PARTY BUT ACCORDING TO
THEM BJP OF INDIA IS A FUNDAMENTALIST PARTY. SYED ABUL MAKSUD IS NOT INVOLVED WITH ANY PARTY
BUT HE THINKS HIMSELF AS LEFTIST.THE MAN IS ALSO A STUPID THAT IN A COLUMN AT PROTHOM ALO
ABOUT TIPAIMUKH DAM, HE WROTE “ INDIA IS A HINDU MAJORITY COUNTRY & BANGLADESH IS A MUSLIM
MAJORITY COUNTRY. SO INDIAN GOVT. IS DESTROYING THIS MUSLIM COUNTRY BY MAKING TIPAIMUKH
DAM”. HE IS NOT EVEN A SCIENCE GRADUATE. I THINK HE HAS NO IDEA ABOUT HYDROELECTRIC POWER,
DISEL POWER, NUCLEAR POWER ETC. DOES HE KNOW HOW MUCH MONEY ARE SPENT BY INDIAN/ WEST
BENGAL GOVT EVERY YEAR FOR EDUCATING MUSLIMS? FOR BACKWARDNESS OF INDIAN/BENGALI MUSLIMS
ONLY HINDU COMMUNALISM IS NOT RESPONSIBLE.THEY ARE BACKWARD BECAUSE OF THEIR LIFE STYLE,
BECAUSE OF THEIR LACK OF TENDENCY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, BECAUSE THEY ARE VERY PASSIONATE
FOR RELIGIOUS/ MADRASHA EDUCATION, BECAUSE OF THEIR PAN-ISLAM SENTIMENT, BECAUSE OF THEIR
RELIGIOUS FANATICISM. WHY THERE IS A MUSLIM WORLD? WHY THERE IS A ORGANIZATION OF ISLAMIC
COUNTRIES? IS THERE A ORGANIZATION OF CHRISTIAN/HINDU/BUDDHIST COUNTRIES? BY USING THEIR PAN
ISLAM SENTMENT & JIHADI PSYCHOLOGY OF MADRASA STUDENTS THE DEFENSE CONTRACTORS ARE DOING
ARMS BUSINESS. EVERYBODY SHOULD KEEP IN MIND THAT NO COMMUNITY CAN DOMINATE THIS WORLD BY
HIGHER BIRTH RATE, NO COMMUNITY SHOULD GET PRIVILEGE FOR THEIR HIGHER BIRTH RATE. I DON’T
WANT TO WRITE ABOUT MR.NURUL KABIR OF NEW AGE, & MR. FARHAD MAZHAR WHO ARE BASICALLY
ISLAMI FUNDAMENTALIST BUT IN TALKSHOWS & WRITINGS THEY ARE MARXIST .SO CALLED MARXIST MR.
BADRUDDIN UMAR IS ALSO A DIEHARD ANTI INDIAN LIKE ISLAMI FUNDEMENTALISTS.
MAXIMUM POLITICAL PARTIES OF BANGLADESH ARE ANT INDIAN.CPB TO JAMATE ISLAMI ALL ARE INVOLVED
IN ANTI INDIAN POLITICS. WHEN AWAMI LEAGUE COMES TO POWER THEY BECOME HYPER ACTIVE. THEY
INVENT DIFFERENT ISSUES & ENGAGE THEMSELVES IN ANTI INDIAN MOVEMENT. OIL & GAS MOVEMENT &
TIPAIMUKH DAM MOVEMENT ARE SUCH TYPE OF MOVEMENTS. WHEN BNP SIGNED THE CONTRACT FOR
INVESTIGATION IN BAY OF BENGAL, FROM WHERE SANGU GAS FIELD WAS DEVELOPED BY CAIRN
ENERGY,THEN THEY WERE SLEEPING. TIPAIMUKH DAM IS A HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT. WHOEVER HEARD
THAT FOR A SIMPLE HYDRO ELECTIRIC PROJECT DOWN STREAM PEOPLE BECOME AFFECTED. ARE
CHITTAGONG PEOPLES AFFECTED BY KAPTAI HYDRO ELECTRIC PROJECT OR THEY ARE BENEFICIARY? NOW
THE LEFTIST ARE THINKING ABOUT THE PEOPLES OF MONIPUR. THEY ARE SAYING THAT THOUSANDS OF
MONIPURIES WILL BE LANDLESS , BIODIVERSITY WILL BE SERIOUSLY HAMPERED. BUT THEY NEVER
ORGANIZED ANY MOVEMENT FOR BANGLADESHI MINORITIES WHO LOST LAKHS ACRE OF LAND BY ENEMY
PROPERTY ACT. . MAXIMUM OF THEIR MEMBERS & VOTERS ARE FROM MINORITY COMMUNITIES. 90% OF
MINORITY COMMUNITIES HAVE RELATIVES IN INDIA WHO WERE FORCED TO LEAVE THIS COUNTRY. CPB HAS
A LAND PROPERTY OF MINIMUM 100 CRORE TAKA DONATED BY HINDUS, WHO LEFT THIS COUNTRY FOR
COMMUNAL PROBLEMS. THEIR RELATIVES ARE DWELLING IN DIFFERENT STATES OF INDIA. WHY ARE THEY
ENGAGED IN ANTI INDIAN MOVEMENT? CPB WAS NOT LIKE THIS. UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF SELIM & MANJU
CPB HAS BEEN INVOLVED IN ANTI INDIAN REACTIONARY POLITICS TO PLASE THEIR CHINEESE LOBBY. THEIR
MAIN THEORITICIAN IS MR. M.M. AKASH WHO WRITES ABOUT EVERY THING LIKE AN EXPERT IN EVERY
SUBJECTS FROM “SHOW SEWING TO HOLY QUORAN RECITING”. AFTER 2001 ELECTION WHEN HINDUS WERE
SERIOUSLY ATTACKED BY BNP ACTIVITSTS, HE WROTE IN A ARTICLE AT PROTHOM ALO “NOW LET US SEE
WHO WILL BE WINNER IN DIALECTICS BETWEEN PRO LIBERATION FORCES & ANTI LIB’N FORCES WITHIN
BNP”. BNP WAS NEVER WITH PRO LIB’N FORCES FROM THE TIME OF ZIA. CAN HE REMEMBER THE SLOGAN OF
BNP DURING PRESIDENT ELECTION OF ZIA REGIME “OSMANIR APAR NAM HORE KRISHNA HORE
RAM.?”(OSMANI’S OTHER NAME IS HORE KRISHNA HORE RAM). AT THE TIME OF JUSTICE SATTAR IT TURNED
TO “HASINA DEBEER APAR NAM HORE KRISHNA HORE RAM”(DIETY HASINA’S OTHER NAME IS HORE KRISHNA
HORE RAM). BNP WAS ALWAYS PRO ISLAMI FUNDEMENTALIST PARTY. BUT THESE LEFTISTS DON’T WRITE
THIS FOR THEIR ANTI INDIAN SENTIMENT. I DON’T WANT TO WRITE ABOUT OTHER LEFTISTS. THEY WERE
ALWAYS ANITI INDIAN,THEY WILL REMAIN ANTI INDIAN BECAUSE OF ANTI INDIAN SENTIMENT THAT HAS
BEEN PREVAILING IN THIS COUNTRY SINCE 1947. SO WHEN AWAMI LEAGUE COMES TO POWER, THE MEDIA,
LEFTISTS-RIGTIST POLITICIANS, SO CALLED CIVIL SOCIETY, SPREADS FEAR OF SELLING BANGLADESH,
SELLING BANGLADESHI PROPERTIES.
BANGLADESHI BUREAUCRATES ARE ANTI INDIAN SINCE 1972. BUREAUCRATES LIKE MR.FARUK CHOWDHURY,
MR.ASAFUDOLLAH, MR.ASAF KHAN HAVE BEEN SPREADING FEAR OF INDIA SINCE 1972 .FOR THE COMMUNAL
FEELINGS OF BUREAUCRATS SUCH A VAST AMOUNT OF HINDU PROPERIES HAD BEEN CONFISCATED & LOST
TO LAND GRABBERS. THE DISTRICT COMMISIONERS (DC) & ASSISTANT COMMISIONERS (LAND) WERE VERY
MUCH CRAZY TO CONFISCATE HINDU PROPERTIES. NOW THEY ARE MISGUIDING GOVT ABOUT THE FIGURES
OF ENEMY PROPERTY.

ABOUT BANGLADESHI HINDU COMMUNITY


BENGALI HINDU WAS THE MOST ADVANCE COMMUNITY IN INDIA AT BRITISH PERIOD. THEY PLAYED A VITAL
ROLE IN INDIAN INDPENDENCE. MOLANA ABUL KALAM AZAD WROTE IT IN HIS BOOK “ INDIA WINS FREEDOM”.
ABOUT THE ROLE OF BENGALIS. THEY LED THE INDIA IN ALL RESPECTS LIKE SCIENCE, LITERATURE,
POLITICS, CULTURE UP TO THE DECADE OF ‘50. THEY HAD THE WORLD CLASS POET LIKE RABINDRANANATH
TAGORE, REBEL POET KAZI NAZRUL ISLAM, SCEINTIST LIKE SIR JAGDISH CHANDRA BASU , PROFESSOR
SOTEYNDRANATH BOSE, PROFESSOR MEGHNAD SAHA, PROFESSOR PRAFULLAH CHANDRA ROY,STATISTICIAN
PROFESSOR PROSANTA MOHALNABISH, SOCIAL REFORM LEADER LIKE EESWAR CHANDRA BIDDYASAGAR,
RAJA RAMMOHAN ROY. REVOLUTINARY LIKE SURYA SEN, KHUDIRAM, PRITILOTA ,POLITICAL LEADER LIKE
NETAJI SUVASH CHANDRA BOSE,M.N.ROY,COMRADE MOZAFFAR AHMAD,DR. BIDHAN CHANDRA ROY,
COMRADE JOYOTI BASU.BANGABANDHU SHEIKH MUJIBUR RAHMAN, MUSICIAN LIKE USTAD ALAUDDIN KHAN,
S.D BURMAN,R.D. BURMAN,KISHORE KUMAR FILM MAKER LIKE SATYAJIT ROY BUSINESSMAN LIKE PRINCE
DWAARKANATH TAGORE. BENGALI HINDUS HAVE COMMUNAL FEELINGS BUT THEY ARE NOT AGGRESSIVE. SO
THEY ELECTED A MUSLIM MAYOR(A.K. FAZLUL HOQUE) OF KOLKATA CITY AT BRITISH PERIOD,THEY WERE
GREAT ADMIRER OF MUSLIM WRITERS KAZI NZRUL ISLAM, SHEIKH FAZLUL KARIM, SYED MUJTABA ALI.
MAXIMUM BENGALI HINDUS WERE NEVER INVOLVED IN COMMUNAL POLITICAL PARTIES. AT
INDIA,BANGLADESH & PAKISTAN ALSO. EAST BENGAL HINDU WAS ALSO A ADVANCE COMMUNITY.
(ON THE CONTRARY EAST BENGAL MUSLIM WAS THE MOST BACKWARD COMMUNITY OF INDIA IN EVERY
RESPECT. BENGALI MUSLIMS DIVIDED INDIA BY SHOWING THE DATA OF DEPRIVATION. BUT DURING THE
RULE OF FAZLUL HOQUE WHEN QUOTA WAS RESERVED FOR MUSLIMS, MAXIMUM POST HADTO REMAIN
VACANT BECAUSE EDUCATED MUSLUMS WERE RARE) THE MAIN CRITERION OF EAST BENGAL HINDU IS THAT
THEY ARE PEACE LOVING. THE HINDUS OF EAST BENGAL WERE GREAT PROMOTERS OF EDUCATION. EVERY
MAJOR TOWN IN EAST BENGAL COULD BOAST OF A SCHOOL OR A COLLEGE FOUNDED BY PRIVATE CHARITY
OF HINDUS. AFTER PARTITION THE NAMES OF THESE INSTITUTIONS WERE NOT CHANGED, BUT SIMPLY
ABBREVIATED, WITH THE RESULT THAT THE NAMES OF THEIR FOUNDERS WERE VIRTUALLY LOST. THUS,
BRAJAMOHAN COLLEGE OF BARISAL, PRAFULLA CHANDRA COLLEGE OF BAGERHAT AND MURARICHAND
COLLEGE OF SYLHET RESPECTIVELY BECAME FACELESS, MEANINGLESS, B.M. COLLEGE, PC. COLLEGE AND
M.C. COLLEGE. AS HINDUS WERE EDUCATED & CUILTURAL STANDARD WAS MUCH MORE HIGHER THAN
MUSLIMS, AFTER PARTITION DISCRIMINATION AGAINST THEM HAS BEEN STARTED. BUT THEY ARE NOT
INVOLVED IN ANY TERRORIST ACTIVITIES TO PROTEST THIS DISCRIMINATION. SO INTERNATINAL. NEWS
MEDIA DOES NOT FOCUS IT. IF ONE ANALYZE THE DISCRIMINATION, HE WILL FIND THAT BANGLADESHI
HINDUS ARE MUCH MORE DEPRIVED THAN TAMILS OF SRILANKA. TAMILS ARE PROTESTING BUT THE
BANGLADESHI HINDUS HAVE BEEN LEAVING THIS COUNTRY SILENTLY.THEY HAD SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN
LIBERATION WAR, ANTI AUTOCRACY MOVEMENT, BUT BY LAST 62 YEARS THEY HAD BEEN UP ROOTED FROM
THEIR LANDS, BUSINESS, ADMINISTRATION & POLITICS.
APPEAL TO BANGABANDHU DAUGHTER & SECULAR MINDED MPS OF AWAMI LEAGUE.
BANGABANDHU COULD NOT REPEAL THE ENEMY PROPERTY ACT BECAUSE AT THAT TIME THE LAND
GRABBERS WERE VERY MUCH POWERFUL WITHIN AWAMI LEAGUE. BUT MAXIMUM OF THEM LEFT AWAMI
LEGUE. ACCORDING TO PROFESSOR BARAKAT’S RESEARCH PAPER, PEOPLE INVOLVED WITH BNP POLITICS
GRABBED 1749500 ACRES,(67%) THOSE INVOLVED WITH AWAMI LEAGUE GRABBED 361400(13%) ACRES, PEOPLE
INVOLVED WITH JAMAAT-E-ISLAMI GRABBED 226200(8.7%) ACRES AND THOSE ENGAGED WITH JATIYA
PARTY(LOOTED 182000(7%) ACRES OF VESTED LAND, . BESIDES 1820 ACRES OF LAND WAS GRABBED BY PEOPLE
LINKED WITH MUSLIM LEAGUE AND 10400 ACRES OF LAND BY PEOPLE INVOLVED WITH OTHER POLITICAL
PARTIES DR BARKAT ALSO EMPHASIZED THAT LESS THAN 0.4% OF THE POPULATION OF BANGLADESH HAS
BENEFITED FROM THE ENEMY PROPERTY ACT . SO IT IS CLEAR THAT THEY ARE VERY FEW MEN WHO ARE
LAND GRABBERS, AND THEY ARE VERY MUCH LESS IN AWAMI LEAGUE. AS THEY ARE POWERFUL IN
ADMINISTRATION I THINK SOMEHOW THEY ARE MISGUIDING AWAMI LEAGUE LEADERS. BANGABANDHU WAS
KILLED, BECAUSE HE HAD A STRONG DESIRE FOR GOOD RELATION WITH INDIA SPECIALLY WITH WEST
BENGAL , HE WAS KILLED BECAUSE HE WAS A SECULAR LEADER. THEY KILLED MINOR BOY SHEIKH RASEL
ALSO BECAUSE THEY KNEW IF THEY KEEP ANYONE ALIVE OF BAGABANDHU FAMILY HE/SHE WILL UP-HOLD
BANGABANDHU’S IDEOLOGY. HIS TWO DAUGHTER SHEIKH HASINA & SHEIKH REHANA WERE LUCKILY
SURVIVED. I HOPE BANGABANDHU DAUGHTER PRIME MINISTER SHEIKH HASINA WILL REPEAL THE ENEMY
PROPERTY ACT COMPLETELY & WILL TAKE STEPS TO RETURN ALL THE LANDS TO THEIR RIGHTFUL OWNER .
BY THUS SHE WILL UPHOLD THE SECULAR FEELINGS WHICH WIIL CREATE AN ATMOSPHERE TO REDUCE
MIGRATION OF HINDUS FROM THIS LAND.
21 JAUARY,2010**
ENGR. LITU CHOWDHURY

“LITUR ADDAI”, http://lituchowdhury.blogspot.com

**THIS ARTICLE IS EDITED TODAY ON 10TH JULY 2010. ONLY TWO PAGES OF ARTCLE “FOR 9/11WHICH
COMPANIES ARE RESPONSIBLE? WHO KILLED TWO LAKH(200000) PEOPLES OF BANGLADESH BY CYCLONE IN
1991? WHO KILLED PRINCESS DIANA? WHO HARASSED PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON?”, PUBLISHED IN THIS WEB
SIDE ON 16 NOVEMBER 2009,WHICH ARE RELEVANT WITH THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN ATTACHED WITH SOME
EDITING.THESE TWO PAGES WERE WRITTEN IN THAT ARTICLE BECAUSE I THOUHGT THAT IT MIGHT NOT BE
POSSIBLE FOR ME TO WRITE ABOUT THESE INTELLECTUALS & POLITICAL PARTIES AFTER DISCLOSING THE
DESTRUCTIVE ACTIVITIES OF MAFIA POWER BROKERS. NOW THESE TWO PAGES ARE REMOVED FROM THAT
ARTICLE.