You are on page 1of 57

# HYDRAULICS / WELL CONTROL / PRESSURE ANALYSIS

1.1

1.2

1.3

## Types of Fluid - Newtonian or Non-Newtonian

a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.

Definitions
Newtonian Fluids
Bingham Fluids
Power Law Fluids
The Modified Power Law
Model Affects on Viscous Flow

1.4

Mud Rheology

1.5

## Laminar, Turbulent and Transitional Flow Patterns

a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.

1.6

Laminar Flow
Turbulent Flow
Determination of Flow Type
Derivation of Effective Viscosity
Determination of Reynolds Number
Determination of Annular Velocity
Use of Reynolds Number to determine Flow Type
Determination of Critical Velocity

a.
b.
c.
d.
e.

## Fanning Friction Factor

Drillstring Pressure Losses
Annular Pressure Losses
Bit Pressure Loss
Surface Pressure Losses

1.7

## Other Hydraulic Calculations

a. Cuttings Slip Velocity
b. Slip Velocity in Turbulent Flow
c. Nozzle Velocity

1.8

Hydraulics Optimization
a. Bit Hydraulic Horsepower
b. Hydraulic Impact Force
c. Optimization

1.9

1.10

Appendix

## 1.1 SUMMARY OF THE PURPOSE OF DRILLING MUD

The importance of the drilling mud in the drilling of a well cannot be over emphasised. It
has a critical bearing on all aspects of the operation. Not only does it act as a transporting
medium for cuttings and gas, enabling us to see at surface what is happening downhole,
but the properties of the mud will determine how affective the drilling is, how well the
hole and formations are protected, and how well subsurface pressure are controlled.

## The principle roles of the mud are:

Cuttings removal
Control subsurface pressures
Lubricate and cool the drill bit and the drillstring
Bottom hole cleaning
Aid in formation evaluation
Protect formation productivity
Aid formation stability

Cuttings removal
This is a very important role of the mud. Not only do the cuttings need to be removed
from the annulus to allow for free movement and rotation of the drillstring, but the
cuttings need to reach the surface in such a condition that they can be used by a geologist
to accurately interprete the downhole geology.
This principle is not only determined by the physical properties of the mud but by the type
of flow pattern present in the annulus. The cuttings need to be removed affectively, but
damage and erosion to the cuttings has to be avoided.
Cuttings density is obviously greater than the mud density, therefore it is normal for a
degree of cuttings slip. Mud properties (viscosity, gel strength) have to be such so as to
minimise this.
Cuttings slip will be affected by the annular velocities:If annular velocities are restricted for any reason (eg pump volume, large hole section,
downhole conditions), mud properties would have to be changed to compensate for an
increased degree of slip.

## Control subsurface pressures

Minimum mudweight is optimum for faster drilling rates and to minimise the risk of
damaging formations and losing circulation.
However, in conventional drilling, the mud also has to be of sufficient density to protect
the well against subsurface formation pressures.

The pressure produced at the bottom of the hole, due to the weight of the static vertical
column of mud, is known as the Hydrostatic Pressure.
If the hydrostatic pressure is equal to the formation pressure, the well is said to be at
balance.
If the hydrostatic pressure is greater than the formation pressure, the well is said to be
overbalanced and protected against influxes into the wellbore.
If the hydrostatic pressure is less than the formation pressure, the well is said to be
underbalanced and therefore subject to influxes of formation fluid.

where

PHYD = psi
TVD = feet

where

= SG
PHYD = psi
TVD = feet

where

= kg/m3
PHYD = Kpa
TVD = m

## Lubricate and cooling

The drilling action and rotation of the drillstring will produce a lot of heat, at the bit and
throughout the drillstring, due to friction. This heat will be absorbed by the mud and
released, to a degree, at surface.
The mud has to cool the bit and lubricate the teeth to allow for affective drilling and to
minimise damage and wear.
The mud has to affectively remove cuttings from around the bit as rock is newly
penetrated. This is to stop the cuttings building up around the bit and teeth (bit balling)
which would prevent the bit from drilling.
The mud lubricates the drillstring by reducing friction between the string and the borehole
wall - this is achieved by additives such as bentonite, graphite or oil.

## Aid in formation evaluation

To obtain the best possible cuttings for geological analysis (viscosity). The type of
flow will determine the degree of erosion and alteration, thus smooth laminar flow is
preferred to chaotic turbulent flow.

To minimise fluid invasion (filtrate) - both water and oil invasion would affect the
resistivity of the mud making formation evaluations more difficult. Thus, a filter cake
is allowed to build up on the wall of the borehole, restricting fluid movement in both
directions.

NB

Filter Cake restricts fluid invasion but may reduce the quality of sidewall cores

## To improve formation testing

Formation Stability

## to prevent erosion or collapse of the wellbore;

to prevent swelling and sloughing shales (oil based mud preferred, water based muds
would have to be treated with Ca/K/Asphalt compounds);
to prevent the dissolving of salt sections (use salt saturated or oil based mud to
prevent taking the salt into solution.

Oil Based
Emulsion

## 1. Clear Water - from freshwater to saturated brine

2. Native Water - water allowed to react with formations containing shales/clays; the
mud will therefore build up a solids content and density naturally.

## 3. Calcium - reduces swelling and hydration of clays

good for gypsum/anhydrite lithologies because there will be no Ca
contamination

## 4. Lignosulphate - high density muds (>14ppg)

tolerance to high temperatures
high tolerance for contamination by drilled solids
permeability will be damaged due to clays dispersing
Not often used

5. KCL/Polymer -

## inhibits shale sloughing

little permeability damage
provides good bit hydraulics
need good solids control equipment at surface because it has a low
tolerance to solids
unstable at high temperatures > 120oC

## Emulsion of water in oil (invert emulsion)

Crude oil or diesel is normally the continuous phase, water the dispersed phase (droplets)

## reduces/inhibits any problems caused by shales

reduces torque and drag
stable at high temperatures
preserves natural permeability, not damaging hydrocarbon zones

flammability
solids removal due to high PV (need good equipment as with polymer
muds)
cost

Emulsion Muds

Water is the continuous phase, oil the dispersed phase (normally 5 - 10%)
Oil added to increase ROP, reduce filter loss, improve lubrication, reduce drag and torque

## 1.3 TYPES OF FLUID - NEWTONIAN or NON-NEWTONIAN ?

The majority of hydraulic parameters are, first of all, dependent on what type of fluid the
drilling mud is and therefore which model is used for the calculations.
The categories are determined by the fluid behaviour when it is subjected to an applied
force (shear stress). Precisely, in terms of fluid behaviour, we are concerned with:

## At what point of applied shear stress is movement initiated in the fluid.

Once movement has been initiated, what is the nature of the fluid movement (Shear
Rate).

1.3a Definitions:
Shear Rate.....in a simple flow, is the change in fluid velocity divided by the width of the
channel through which the fluid is moving.

v2
Shear Rate = v2 - v1
()
h
h
= sec-1

v1

At wellsite, the Shear Rate is determined by the rotational speed of the Fann Viscometer
in which the tests are conducted.
Thus, Shear Stress is recorded at rotational speeds of 600 (shear rate = 1022 sec-1), 300
(shear rate = 511 sec-1), 200, 100, 6 and 3 rpm.

Shear Stress....is the force per unit area required to move a fluid at a given shear rate.

Area

## Shear Stress () = F/A

= lb. ft
in2

or

lb. ft or
100ft2

dynes
cm2

The shear stresses recorded for each of the shear rates at the different rotational speeds of
the viscometer can then be plotted to produce an overall behaviour profile across the
rheological spectrum:-

Shear
Stress
lb/100ft2

100

200

300

400

500

600

## Shear Rate, rpm

Fluid Viscosity.....is the fluids shear stress divided by the corresponding shear rate.
Fluid Viscosity (
) = Shear Stress
Shear Rate
= dynes/cm2
sec-1

= poise

1 poise

ft2

= 47886 cP

## 1.3b Newtonian Fluids

The fluid will begin to move the instant that shear stress is applied. Thereafter, the
degree of movement is proportional to the stress applied...
ie

A linear relationship exists between Shear Stress () and Shear Rate ().

## For a Newtonian Fluid......

where = viscosity

Most drilling fluids and cement slurries, however, exhibit non-Newtonian behaviour
where the laminar flow relationship between shear stress and shear rate is non-linear.
These fluids also require a certain amount of shear stress to initiate flow and thereafter,
require additional stress to be applied as the shear rate increases.
The level of shear stress required to initiate fluid flow is known as the fluids Yield Point.

Two main models have been used as a standard in the oil industry:1.
2.

## The Bingham Plastic Model

The Power Law Model

In recent years, it is generally accepted that both models have merit but that the Power
Law Model is more applicable to the majority of fluids.
A third, widely used, model has been developed, being a combination of both previous
models. This model is known as the Modified Power Law (also known as the Yield
Power Law or Herschel-Bulkley Model).

## 1.3c Bingham Fluids

This model predicts that fluid movement will take place only after a minimum value of
Shear Stress has been applied. This minimum value is the Yield Point of the fluid.
Once movement has been initiated, the relationship between and is linear (ie
Newtonian), with the constant being called the Plastic Viscosity (PV).
PV is dependant on both temperature and pressure.

Dial
600

300
YP
(rpm)
300

## For Bingham Fluids....

600
= YP + .PV

PV = 600 - 300
YP = 300 - PV = 0

The Bingham Plastic Model represents, fairly well, the behaviour exhibited by fluids such
as bentonite slurries, class G cements and low gravity oils. A typical Bingham fluid will
have high viscosity but no gel strength.
For more complex fluids, however, the Bingham model is subject to error. Whereas the
Bingham model simulates fluid behaviour in the high shear rate range (300 to 600 rpm), it
is generally inaccurate in the low shear range. Shear stresses measured at high shear rates
are usually poor indicators of fluid behaviour at low shear rates, the area of interest for
simulating annular flow behaviour. Subject to this error, the calculated Yield Point will
tend to result in calculated pressure losses and equivalent circulating densities that are
larger than those actually observed.

## 1.3d Power Law Fluids

The Power Law Model assumes that fluid movement will be initiated immediately that
any shield stress is applied. The model then predicts that fluids will exhibit a non linear
relationship between and and introduces two index values in order to determine the
relationship.

Dial
600
300

300

(rpm)

600

100

10
K
1

10

100

= K ()n

1000

log

## where K = consistency index

n = flow behaviour index

## Determination of n and K:n = 3.32 log 600

300
K = 1.067 300
(511)n

(units lb / 100ft2 )

K = 5.11 300
(511)n

## (units dynes / cm2 )

The Power Law rheological model better fits the behaviour of most fluids, especially
polymer based fluids, than the Bingham Plastic Model.
Fluids that follow this model have no shear stress when the shear rate is zero. The draw
back here, is that most fluids have a yield stress but this cannot be accounted for in this
model.
Similar to the Bingham Plastic model, but to a lesser degree, the Power Law model
accurately predicts fluid behaviour at high shear rates but shows a degree of error at the
lower shear rates.
The result of this is that annular pressure losses and ECDs are under-predicted by this
models calculations.
In many cases, however, the Power Law Model does closely approximate fluid properties
even when calculated from the high shear rate values.
Different values of n are possible, depending on which shear stress/rate pairings are
used in the calculation. Thus, this model can be applied by using data from a range of
annular shear rates, providing a better accuracy in predicting drilling fluid performance.

With 6 and 3

## n = 3.32 log 6/3

K = 100 / (170.3)n

K = 3 / (5.11)n

In the extreme case, when n=1, the fluid will become a Newtonian fluid
ie = K

## When to use the low shear rate pairing (6 and 3 rpm) ? :

to more accurately describe the suspension and hole cleaning potential of a fluid
in large diameter holes
in horizontal drilling applications

## 1.3e The Modified Power Law

This model combines the theoretical and practical aspects of the Bingham Plastic and the
Power Law models.
In this model, the n and K values are similar to those derived by the Power Law model.
The model assumes that fluids will require a certain amount of applied stress before
movement will take place and, for these fluids having a yield stress, the calculated values
of n and K will be different.

Shear
Stress

Shear Rate

## For Modified Power Law Fluids....

= 0 + K ()n
where K = consistency index
n = flow behaviour index

The value 0 is the fluids yield point at zero shear rate and, in theory, is identicle to the
Bingham Plastic yield point, though its calculated value is different.

When n = 1,
0 = 0,

## the model becomes the Bingham Plastic Model

the model becomes the Power Law model

The model works well for both water based and oil based drilling muds because both
exhibit shear thinning behaviour and have a shear stress at zero shear rate.
The problem with the model is that the determination of n, K and 0 is very complex.

## Rheogram Summary of the Drilling Fluid Models

Shear
Stress
Bingham Plastic
Modified P.Law
Power Law
Newtonian
Shear Rate

NOTE, in order for the QLOG system to accurately calculate realtime hydraulics,
the Shear Rate values need to be updated regularly in the Equipment Table.

The data can be entered in any of the 3 standard shear rate pairings
ie

## 600 and 300

200 and 100
6 and 3

The industry normal is to use the 600/300 pairing but as was seen in this manual, there
are applications when the 6/3 pairing can be more meaningful.
Ideally, if there is a reason for using the 6/3 pairing, it should be discussed and confirmed
with the drilling and mud engineers.

## 1.3f Model Affects on Viscous Flow

Newtonian Fluids
Laminar flow through pipes or annulus is characterised by a parabolic velocity profile,
with the velocity approaching zero at the walls and being at a maximum in the centre of
the flow.

## Non Newtonian Fluids

For these fluids, the flow will not necessarily be parabolic. As the fluid becomes
increasingly non-Newtonian, the velocity profile will become increasingly flatter
towards the centre. This is known as plugged flow.
Using the Power Law as a basis, when n is equal to one, the fluid is Newtonian and the
velocity profile will indeed be parabolic.
As the value of n decreases, ie the fluid becomes increasingly non-Newtonian and the
velocity profile will become increasingly flatter. In this flat part of the profile, the shear
rate will be close to zero (ie very little movement between adjacent laminae). Fluids that
exhibit a high viscosity in this near zero shear rate condition offer significant
improvements in hole cleaning efficiency.

Areas of
High Shear

n=1

n = 0.6

n = 0.2

## 1.4 MUD RHEOLOGY - principle parameters

Viscosity
Controls the magnitude of shear stress which develops as one layer of fluid slides over
another. It is a measure of the friction between fluid layers, providing a scale for
describing fluid thickness. It will decrease with temperature.
In simple terms, it describes the thickness of the mud when it is in motion.

## Normal unit of measurement is the centipoise (CP), where 47886 CP = 1 lb.f.s

ft2
Plastic Viscosity
For a Bingham Fluid, PV is the amount of shear stress, in excess of the yield stress, that
will induce a unit rate of shear. More simply, it is the relationship between shear stress
and shear rate during fluid movement; it is the slope of the straight line that passes
through 600 and 300.

Funnel Viscosity
This is a direct measurement from the Funnel (as opposed to Fann) viscometer and is
measured in secs/qt. Generally used at wellsite for immediate measurements, this is
simply the length of time it takes for one quart of fluid to pass through the funnel.
It is not regarded as being applicable to the analysis of circulating performance.
Apparent Viscosity - simply 600/2

Yield Point
The yield point, or yield stress, of a fluid is a measure of the attractive forces between
mud particles resulting from the presence of +ve and -ve charges on the particle surfaces.
It is a measure of the forces that cause mud to gel once it is motionless and affects the
carrying capacity of the mud. In other words, it is the strength of the fluid capable of
supporting a certain particle weight or size.
Normal unit of measurement is the Imperial

lb
100ft2

## metric: dynes / cm2

Gel Strength
The ability of the mud to develop and retain a gel structure. It is analogous to shear
strength and defines the ability of the mud to hold solids in suspension.
More simply, it describes the thickness of a mud that has been motionless for a period of
time (unlike viscosity which describes the mud thickness when in motion).
It is a measure of the thickening property of a fluid and is a function of time.
Measurements are therefore conducted after periods of 10 seconds and 10 minutes.

## Normal units of measurement

lb
100ft2

With the duration of a drilling operation, ie the age of a drilling fluid, viscosity
and gel strengths will both tend to increase as a result of the introduction of solids
into the mud system.

## Filtrate / Filter Cake

Fluid invasion of newly drilled rocks will occur if there is a pressure differential. The
fluid that is lost to the formation in this way is called filtrate.
To try to minimise this, a layer of fine solids is allowed to build up on the rock surface.
This will be allowed to build up to a desired thickness in order to prevent invasion. This
layer is termed the filter cake

## 1.5 LAMINAR, TURBULENT and TRANSITIONAL FLOW PATTERNS

The type of flow pattern will be governed by the fluid velocity, the annular diameters and
the characteristics of the mud.

In general, the lower the fluid velocity and the greater the annular diameter, the more
likely the flow is to be laminar.
A turbulent flow pattern is more likely when the fluid velocity is high and when there is a
small annular clearance ie around the drill collar section.

## 1.5a Laminar Flow

A smooth flow pattern will be exhibited with fluid layers travelling in straight lines
parallel to the axis. The velocity will increase towards the centre of the stream. Laminar
flow will develop from low fluid velocities.

## There is only one component of fluid velocity - longitudinal.

Shear resistance is caused by sliding action only.

## 1.5b Turbulent Flow

The flow pattern is random in time and space, with chaotic and disordered motion of the
fluid particles. This results in two velocity components - longitudinal and transverse.

## Shear resistances present are far greater than in Laminar flow.

Turbulent flow will develop at higher fluid velocities with the final velocity profile
tending to be reasonably uniform despite the chaotic components. For this reason,
turbulent flow is actually more affective in cuttings removal, but the disadvantages

## erosion of cuttings, thereby destroying interpretative properties

the possibility of hole erosion
increased pressure losses due to higher frictional forces
removal of mud filter cake

One advantage of turbulent flow is when cementing - helping to dislodge mud cake from
the walls allowing the cement to contact fresh surfaces.

Transitional Flow
In reality, there is not an instantaneous change from laminar to turbulent flow as fluid
velocity increases. There will obviously be a transitional period where the flow changes
from one to the other. This transitional flow will exhibit elements of both laminar and
turbulent flow.

## 1.5c Determination of Flow Type

It is necessary to know what type of flow pattern is present, not only because of the
physical affects, but in order to calculate pressure losses in the string and the annulus, a
very important part of hydraulic analysis.

Fluid velocity and annular diameters are used to determine the type of flow, in
conjunction with mud density and mud viscosity.

These parameters are used to determine the Reynolds Number, a dimensionless number:
Re = DV

where D = diameter
V = fluid velocity
= density
e = effective viscosity

Notice that the effective viscosity is used in the determination of the Reynolds number,
rather than viscosities derived by surface measurements.

## 1.5d Derivation of Effective Viscosity

Bingham Fluid
e = PV + 300(Dh Dp) YP
v

(imperial)

## = PV + 2874 (Dh Dp) YP

48000 v

(metric)

Imperial units: e = cP
v = ft/min
D = inches
YP = lb/100ft2
PV = cP

Metric:

v = av annular vel

e = cP
v = m/sec
D = mm
YP = dynes/cm2
PV = cP

## Power Law Fluid

e = [ 2.4 v
[ DhDp

2n + 1 ] n
3n ]

= 1916K (DhDp)
4800v

= [ 200 v
[ DhDp

200K (DhDp)
v

x [ 4000 v (2n + 1) ] n
[ DhDp ( n ) ]
2n + 1 ] n
3n ]

Imperial: e = cP
v = ft/min
D = inches
K = lb/100ft2

0.5K (DhDp)
v

Metric: e = cP
v = m/sec
D = mm
K = dynes/cm2

(imperial)

(metric)

(SI)

SI: e = mPa.s
v = m/min
D = mm
K = Poise

## 1.5e Determination of the Reynolds Number

Imperial

Re = 15.47 Dv
e

Metric

Re = 1000 DV
e

SI

Re = DV
60e

D = diameter
= inches
v = average velocity = ft/min
= mud density
= ppg
e = effective visc = cP

D = mm
v = m/sec
= kg/litre
e = cP

D = mm
v = m/min
= kg/m3
e = mPa.s

## D = hole diameter - pipe outside diameter

Note that for fluid velocity, an average velocity is used in the determination of the
Reynolds Number and Effective Viscosity. In reality, as we have seen, the velocity is
least at the walls of the conduit, increasing to a maximum at the centre of the channel.
The average fluid velocity (annular velocity or pipe velocity) is determined using the
following formulae:

## 1.5f Determination of Annular Velocity

v (ft/min) = 24.5 Q
Dh2 Dp2

Q = flowrate (gpm)
Dh = hole diameter (in)
Dp = pipe outer diam (in)

v (ft/min) = 1030 Q
Dh2 Dp2

Q = bbls/min
Diameters (in)

v (m/min) = 1273000 Q
Dh2 Dp2

Q = m3/min
Diameters (mm)

These formulae can obviously be used to calculate the velocity of the mud within the
drillstring.
In this case, Dh2 would be replaced by Di2 the inside diameter of the pipe.
Dp would, in this case, be equal to zero.

## 1.5g Use of the Reynolds Number in determining Flow Type

The value of the Reynolds number defines the transition between laminar and turbulent
flow.
Bingham
The Critical Reynolds Number is 2100.

## If Re < Rec, then the flow is said to be laminar

If Re > Rec, then the flow is said to be turbulent

Power Law
The Critical Reynolds Number is given by 3470 - 1370n

## If Re < 3470 - 1370n, the flow is laminar

If Re > 4270 - 1370n, the flow is turbulent
If 3470 - 1370n < Re < 4270 - 1370n, the flow is transitional

## 1.5h Determination of Critical Velocity

The Critical Velocity is the fluid velocity (whether annular or pipe) at which the flow type
becomes turbulent.
In reality, at wellsite, the engineer is primarily concerned with the annular velocity since
turbulent flow here has the associated problems of hole erosion, damage to cuttings and
removal of filter cake.
When analysing annular velocity, the engineer will be looking for sufficient annular
velocity to affectively lift and remove the cuttings, but within a laminar flow regime so
that minimal damage is done.
Many engineers will be happy with, even require, transitional or turbulent flow around
the drill collar section. Here, the annular clearance is smallest so it is most important to
keep the section clear of cuttings. For remaining annular sections, however, laminar flow
will always be required to minimise hole damage and to keep pressure losses low.

Bingham
String Vc = 2.48 x ( PV + (PV2 + 73.57.YP.Di2.))
Di2

Annular Vc =

3.04
x ( PV + (PV2 + 40.05YP(DhDp)2 ))
2
(DhDp)

## Vc = critical velocity (m/min)

Dh = hole diameter (mm)
Dp = pipe outer diameter (mm)
Di = pipe inner diameter (mm)
= mud density (kg/litre)
PV = plastic viscosity
YP = yield point

Power Law
1
String Vc = 0.6 [ (3470 1370n)K ]
[
1.27
]

2n

[ 3n + 1 ] 2n
[ 1.25 Di n ]

1
Annular Vc = 0.6 [ (3470 1370n)K ]
[
2.05
]

2n

n
[
2n + 1
]
[0.64 (DhDp)n ]

2n

## The units are the same as above.

n and K are the Power Law coefficients.

## Further equations to determine the Critical Annular Velocity:-

Imperial

1
n
Vc (ft/min) = [ 3.88 x 104K] 2 - n [ ( 2.4 ) (2n + 1) ] 2 - n
[

]
[ (DhDp) ( 3n ) ]
= ppg
D = inches
K = lb / 100ft2

SI

1
Vc (m/min) = [ 9 x 104K] 2 - n [ ( 200 )
[

]
[ (DhDp)
= kg / m3
D = mm
K = Poise

n
(2n + 1) ] 2 - n
( 3n ) ]

## 1.6 DETERMINATION OF SYSTEM PRESSURE LOSSES

Regarding the well as a whole as a closed system, pressure losses will occur throughout
the system :through each drillpipe section
through the bit
through each annular section
through surface lines eg standpipe, kelly hose, pumps and lines
The total of all theses losses ie Total System Pressure Loss should be equal to the actual
pressure measured on the standpipe.
This is a very important part of hydraulic evaluation. Obviously, the maximum pressure
loss possible will be determined by the rating of the pumps and other surface equipment.
This maximum is normally far in excess of the pressure loss that will be desired by the
drilling engineer.
The logging engineers task is normally to take given parameters from the drilling
engineer, then select, for example, the correct nozzle sizes that will produce the desired
system pressure loss.
The amount of pressure loss will be dependant on flowrate, mud density and rheology, the
length of each section and the diameters of each section.
Whether the flow is laminar or turbulent is also an important influence on the pressure
loss - turbulent flow will produce larger pressure losses.

## 1.6a Fanning Friction Factor

The frictional forces involved will have a large affect on the actual pressure losses in a
given annular or pipe section.
The frictional forces present will be very different depending on whether the flow is
laminar or turbulent:

with laminar flow, the fluid movement is in one direction only - parallel to the conduit
walls, with velocity increasing towards the centre.. Frictional forces will therefore
only be present due to fluid layers moving longitudinally against each other.

with turbulent flow, fluid movement is much more complex and multi-directional, so
that many more frictional forces are present.

For this reason, a coefficient called the Fanning Friction Factor is determined for each
type of flow and whether we are dealing with pipe or annular pressure losses. The friction
factor is determined from the Reynolds Number which has already been calculated for
pipe or annular sections based on annular velocity, diameters, density and effective
viscosity.

Laminar Flow

Turbulent Flow

fann = 24 / Re

fpipe = 16 / Re

## Re = Pipe Reynolds No.

fturb = a / Reb
where Re = Reynolds number in the pipe or annulus
a = log n + 3.93
50
b = 1.75 - log n
7

Transitional Flow

fann = [ Re - c ] x [ (
a
) - (24) ] + 24
[ 800 ] [ (4270 - 1370n)b
(c)]
c

## where Re = Annular Reynolds No.

a = (log n + 3.93) / 50
b = (1.75 - log n) / 7
c = 3470 - 1370n

fpipe = [ Re - c ] x [ (
a
) - (16) ] + 16
[ 800 ] [ (4270 - 1370n)b
(c)]
c

## where Re = Pipe Reynolds No.

a, b, and c are as above

When using the Power Law Model, the values of the Fanning Friction are substituted into
equations in order to calculate pressure losses in the annulus or in the pipe.
When calculating these pressure losses, each individual section has to be calculated
seperately, then totalled to give an overall pipe or annular pressure loss.

Bingham

## For laminar flow,

Ploss (KPa) = LQ PV
+
612.95 Di4

901.63 Di4.8

where

YP L
13.26Di

## L = length of section (m)

Q = flowrate (litre/min)
= mud density (kg/litre)
PV = plastic viscosity
YP = yield point
Di = pipe inner diameter (inch)

Power Law
Here, there is just one equation to be considered, since whether the flow is laminar or
turbulent has already been accounted for by the Reynolds Number and the Fanning
Friction Factor.
SI

1800 Di

92870 Di

## where fp = Friction Factor in the pipe

v = Average velocity in the pipe (m/min)
= Mud density (kg/m3)
Di = Pipe inner diameter (mm)
L = Length of section (m)

where v = ft/min
= ppg
Di = inches
L = ft

## 1.6c Annular Pressure Losses

Bingham

laminar flow,

Ploss =

L Q PV
+
408.63(Dh+Dp)(DhDp)3

## L 0.8 Q1.8 PV0.2

706.96 (Dh+Dp)1.8(DhDp)3

YP L
13.26(DhDp)

The units are the same as those used in the drillstring pressure loss formula.
Dh = hole diameter (inch)
Dp = pipe outer diam (inch)

Power Law
SI

Ploss (Kpa) =

fa.v2..L
1800 (Dh - Dp)

fa.v2..L
92870 (Dh - Dp)

## fa = Annular Friction Factor

v = Average annular velocity (m/min)
= Mud density (kg/m3)
Dh = Hole diameter (mm)
Dp = Pipe outside diameter (mm)
L = Length of section (m)

where v = ft/min
= ppg
Dh = inches
Dp = inches
L = ft

## 1.6d Bit Pressure Loss

ie the system loses pressure when the mud passes through the nozzles.
Due to the very fast velocities involved and the small area of the nozzles, this will be the
largest singular pressure loss throughout the system.
SI

Ploss (Kpa) =

. Q2. 277778
(D1 + D22 +D32 +....)2
2

## where = mud density (kg/m3)

Q = flow rate (m3/min)
Dn = nozzle diameter (mm)
Imperial

Ploss (psi) =

. Q2. 156
(D1 + D22 +D32 +....)2
2

where = ppg
Q = gpm
Dn = 32nds inch

Unfortunately, these equations (and the QLOG software) will not produce accurate
calculations for diamond bit pressure losses.
Eastman Christensen suggest the following calculations:-

TFA

## For Feeder Collector, Ploss (bar) = 24.738 0.34 Q1.47

TFA1.76
where = mud density (kg/l)
Q = flowrate (l/min)
TFA = mm2
1 bar = 100KPa

## 1.6e Surface Pressure Losses

The calculation of pressure losses due to surface equipment is not as clear cut as previous
calculated losses and will be dependant on the type of equipment present on the rig.
ie type of pump, length of standpipe and surface lines, length of kelly etc

One method of calculation is based on Binghams formula for turbulent flow pressure
losses, where the main part of the equation, 0.8 Q1.8 PV0.2 is multiplied by a constant
representing 4 rig types or classifications.
Surface Ploss = E 0.8 Q1.8 PV0.2

## where Ploss = psi

or
= ppg or
Q = gpm or

KPa
kg/litre
litre/min

E is the constant representing the 4 rig surface equipment types. The rig type should be
attainable from charts/tables kept on the rig. If not, the usual type and default is Type 4.
Classification

1
2
3
4

Imperial

E
Metric

2.5 x 104
9.6 x 105
5.3 x 105
4.2 x 105

8.8 x 106
3.3 x 106
1.8 x 106
1.4 x 106

In practice, this classification is generally not available at wellsite. For this reason,
together with the fact that the method is based on a Bingham fluid, Datalog uses another
method based on mud density and flowrate, together with a constant to represent different
types of rig equipment.

Hence:
Surface Pressure Loss = 0.35 x Factor x Mud Density x Flowrate
Factor represents the value selected in the QLOG equipment table - the surface
connection factor. This value can range from 0.2 to 0.5, with 0.5 being the normal
default value.

## 1.7 OTHER HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS

1.7a Cuttings Slip Velocity
So far, the annular velocities that we have seen calculated only deal with the velocity of
the fluid. Drilled cuttings are obviously going to be far denser than the mud, so that there
is always going to be a degree of slip.
How significant the degree of cuttings slip is going to be will be dependent on the relative
densities, viscosity and carrying potential of the mud, and particle size.
Net Cuttings Velocity = annular velocity cuttings slip velocity

SI units

Vs = 0.42 Dp (p m)0.667
m0.333 e0.333

Imperial

Vs = 175 Dp (p m)0.667
m0.333 e0.333

## Dp = particle diameter (mm)

p = particle density (kg/m3)
m = mud density (kg/m3)
e = effective mud viscosity (mPa.s)
Vs = slip velocity (m/min)

Dp = inches
p = ppg
m = ppg
e = cP
Vs = ft/min

Cuttings slip when the flow type is turbulent will be clearly different from when the flow
is laminar and constant forces are involved.
With turbulent flow, whether the slip velocity is constant or not is dependant on the
Reynolds Number determined for the cuttings.

SI units

[
1.5
]

Imperial

## Vs (ft/min) = 113.4 [ Dp (p - m) ] 0.5

[
1.5
]

Note that there are no velocity or viscosity inputs into this equation. It is therefore
dependant on the Particle Reynolds number as to whether the slip velocity will be
constant.

SI units

e

## where = mud density (kg/m3)

Vs = slip velocity (m/min)
Dp = particle diameter (mm)
e = effective viscosity (mPa.s)

Imperial

## Rep = 15.47. . Vs. Dp

e

where = ppg
Vs = ft/min
Dp = inches
e = cP

If the Particle Reynolds Number > 2000, the particle will fall at the same rate
ie cuttings slip velocity will be constant in turbulent flow
In the determination of slip velocity, a Cuttings Re number is incorporated. So to, because
of the different frictional forces present on the cuttings, is a friction or drag coefficient.

## 1.7c Nozzle Velocity

Vn (m/sec) =

Q
38.71A

Vn (ft/sec) = 0.32Q
A

Q = flowrate (litre/min)
A = total flow area of nozzles (in2)
Q = gpm
A = in2

## Nozzle conversion to Total Flow Area

TFA (inch2) = 1/4 (d12 + d22 + d32 )
)
(
322

/4 d2
1024

## Alternatively, the nozzle diameters, rather than TFA can be used:

SI units

Vn (m/sec) = 21220 Q
Dn2

Imperial

Vn (ft/sec) = 418.3 Q
Dn2

where Q = m3/min
Dn = mm

where Q = gpm
Dn = 32nds inch

## 13 3/8 casing set at 500m, ID = 12.42 (315.5mm)

12 1/4 (311.2mm) hole drilled to a depth of 1500m
200m x 9 1/2 DCs,
100m x 8 DCs

## OD 9.5 ID 3.0 (241.3/76.2mm)

OD 8.0 ID 3.0 (203.2/76.2mm)

300m x HWDP
DP

## OD 5.0 ID 3.0 (127/76.2mm)

OD 5.0 ID 4.28 (127/108.7mm)

Jets 3 x 15 (3 x 11.9mm)
MD 9.8ppg
100 SPM at flowrate 2.0 m3/min
600 and 300 60/35
)
Surface Conn Factor 0.5 ) set in equipment table

## 1. What type of flow is present in each annular section ?

What is the Total System and Surface Pressure Loss ?
2. Compare the surface pressure loss using a factor of 0.2
3. What flowrate is required to produce a system pressure of 2500psi ?
4. What new jet sizes are required to reduce the pressure back to 2000psi ?
5. What is the pressure if the mud weight is increased to 10.8ppg ?
6. With a flowrate of 2.0 m3/min, what jet sizes are now required to give a system
pressure of around 2000psi ?
7. Is the flow still laminar in all annular sections ?
8. If transitional flow is acceptable around the 9 1/2 DCs but not the 8 DCs, what is
the maximum flowrate ?
9. With this flowrate, how many jets may have washed out if a surface pressure drop to
1650psi was seen ?

## 1.8 HYDRAULICS OPTIMIZATION

1.8a Bit Hydraulic Horsepower

This is the power used by the jetting action of the bit, which has to balance maximum
ROP and maximum jetting with effective hole cleaning.
SI units

## Bit HP (KW) = Pb x Q x 0.01667

Imperial

Bit HP (HP) = Pb x Q
1714

Q = flowrate (m3/min)
Pb = bit pressure loss (KPa)

Q = gpm
Pb = psi

The Total System Hydraulic Horsepower can be calculated by substituting the Total
System Pressure Loss (in place of Bit Pressure Loss) into the same equation.

## 1.8b Hydraulic Impact Force

This is the force exerted on the formation due to the fluid exiting the jets. Cleaning is by
direct erosion on the bottom and by cross flow under the bit.
SI units

Bit IF (newtons) = Q Vn
60

## = mud density (kg/m3)

Q = flowrate (m3/min)
Vn = nozzle velocity (m/sec)

Imperial

Bit IF (lbs) = Q Vn
1932

= ppg
Q = gpm
Vn = ft/sec

1.8c Optimization

Hydraulics can be optimised in two ways:1) by maximising the Impact Force of the jets on the bottom of the hole.
2) by maximising the hydraulic power expended by the bit.

The power expended (or used up) by the bit is a proportion of the total power available
( HPt). This is determined either by the maximum pressure of the pumps:

## where max HPpump = HPt = Pmax Q

1714

or, more typically, it is based on a desired maximum pump pressure together with a
maximum flow rate that will give sufficient annular velocity for cuttings removal.

Once the maximum power available to the system is known, hydraulic performance can
be optimised in the following ways :-

## 1) Optimise Horsepower by setting Bit HP at 65% of Total Available Power

2) Optimise Impact Force by setting Bit HP at 48% of Total Available Power

Since the hydraulic horsepower at the bit is dependent on jet velocity and therefore on the
pressure loss at the bit, hydraulic performance in practice can simply be optimised by
selecting jet sizes to give:

## Use of the QLOG hydraulics programs:

Current Profiles (onhyd)
This is an optimization program that works based on realtime information such as pump
output, mud density and pressure losses. These values can be changed should a change in
parameters be the reason for running the optimization program. The minimum and
maximum jet velocities are suggested values.
The program can then be run to give you the parameters required for optimum hydraulics
based on both Hydraulic Impact Force and Hydraulic Horsepower at the bit.
Impact Force relates directly to the erosional force of the drill fluid and is therefore good
optimization for bottom hole cleaning.
Hydraulic Horsepower optimization generally requires lower annular velocities so that
flow type is more likely to be laminar.

## New Profiles (offhyd)

This program is offline so that you can input any hole and pipe profiles, mud parameters,
flow rate and jet size and calculate the resulting hydraulic parameters such as pressure
losses, flow types, annular velocities etc.
This program would be used when pre-determining the correct parameters for a new hole
section or bit run. By changing the inputs, you can attempt to optimize the hydraulics.
To optimize for hydraulic horsepower, the %HHP at the bit should be 65% of the Total
HHP.
Since HHP is determined by pressure loss, this equates to Bit Pressure Loss being 65% of
the Total System Pressure Loss.
To optimize for hydraulic impact, the %HHP at the bit should be 48% of the Total HHP.

## 1. What is the % Hydraulic Horsepower of the bit ?

2. Using the following ranges and limitations, try to optimise the hydraulics whilst still
retaining laminar flows and good annular velocities for cuttings removals.

Flowrate
1.8 to 2.2 m3/min
Mud density 9.6 to 10.2 ppg
Maximum System Pressure 2800 psi
Minimum Jet sizes

3 x 10mm

## Use the following hole and pipe profiles and setups:

9 5/8 casing set at 2500m, ID 8.68 (220.4mm)
8 1/2 (215.9mm) hole drilled to 4000m
500m x 6 1/2 DCs OD 6.5, ID 2.88 (165.1/73.1mm)
400m x HWDP
OD 5.0, ID 3.0 (127/76.2mm)
DP
OD 5.0, ID 4.28 (127/108.7mm)
Flowrate
1.4 m3/min
Mud density 10.5ppg
Surface Conn Factor 0.5
600 and 300 70/42

## 1. What jets would produce a system pressure of 2500 psi ?

With these setups, what are a) flow types in each annular section
b) annular velocities in each section
c) % HP at the bit

2. With a flowrate of 1.6m3/min, what jets are required to give a system pressure
of 2200psi ?
What now are a) flow types
b) annular velocities
c) % HP at bit

3. Using the following ranges and limits, attempt to optimize the hydraulics whilst
retaining laminar flows in each section and good annular velocities.
Flowrate
1.3 to 1.6 m3/min
Mud density 10.3 to 10.6 ppg
Maximum system pressure 2850 psi

## 1.9 Equivalent Circulating Density

The pressure exerted at the bottom of the hole by the static column of mud is known as
the Hydrostatic Pressure.
PHYD = x TVD x 0.052 where

PHYD = psi
TVD = feet

## PHYD = x TVD x 0.433 where = SG

(pressure & depth have the same units)
PHYD = x TVD x 0.00981

where

= kg/m3
PHYD = Kpa
TVD = m

During circulation, the pressure exerted by the fluid column at the bottom of the hole
increases as a result of frictional forces and annular pressure losses caused by the fluid
movement.
This increased pressure is termed the Dynamic Pressure or Bottom Hole Circulating
Pressure (BHCP).
BHCP = PHYD + Pa

## where Pa is the sum of the annular pressure losses

This in turn means that the acting density of the mud will increase when the fluid is
moving. This is termed the Equivalent Circulating Density.

a.

ECD = + Pa
0.052xTVD

ECD
Pa
TVD

=
=
=
=

psi
feet
ppg

b.

ECD = +

Pa
0.00981xTVD

ECD
Pa
TVD

= kg/m3 EMW
= KPa
= m
= kg/m3

## For each of the following situations, calculate the mud density.

1. TVD 3500 ft
Hydrostatic Pressure 1729psi

2. TVD 3000m
Hydrostatic Pressure 32373 Kpa

## For each of the following situations, calculate

3. TVD 4000 ft
Mud density 9.5ppg
Annular Pressure Losses 250psi

4. TVD 3000m
Mud density 1150 kg/m3
Annular Pressure Losses 3000 Kpa

a) Hydrostatic Pressure
b) Bottom Hole Circulating Pressure
c) Equivalent Circulating Density

## 1.10 Surge and Swab Pressures

Surge Pressures result from running pipe into the hole creating a pressure increase. The
size of the pressure increase will be dependent on the pipe running speed, the annular
clearance and whether the pipe is open or closed.
Excessive Bottom Hole Pressure could break down weak or unconsolidated formations.

Swab Pressures result from pulling the pipe out of the hole. The frictional drag combined
with the piston effect will create a reduction in pressure.
This reduction in the hydrostatic could lead to the invasion of formation fluids.

More than 25% of blowouts result from reduced hydrostatic pressure caused by
swabbing.

Excessive surge pressures can lead to lost circulation. Running casing is a particularly
vulnerable time due to the small annular clearance and the fact that the casing is
closed ended.

Beside the well safety aspect, invasion of fluids due to swabbing can lead to mud
contamination and necessitate the costly task of replacing the mud.

## Pressure changes due to changing pipe direction, eg during connections, can be

particularly damaging to the well by causing sloughing shale, by forming bridges or
ledges, and by causing hole fill requiring reaming.

## Calculation of Surge and Swab Pressures.

The same method is used to calculate the differential pressure caused by both surging and
swabbing. To determine the new Hydrostatic Pressure, the differential pressure is either
added or subtracted depending on whether surge or swab respectively.

Firstly, the Fluid Velocity of the displaced mud caused by the pipe movement has to be
calculated.
For Closed Ended Pipe:
Fluid Vel (ft/min) = [ 0.45 +
[

Dp2
Dh2 Dp2

] x Vp
]

## Vp = pipe speed (ft/min)

Dh = hole diameter (in)
Dp = pipe outer diameter (in)
Di = pipe inner diameter (in)

## For Open Ended Pipe:

Fluid Vel (ft/min) = [ 0.45 +
Dp2 Di2
] x Vp
2
2
2
[
Dh Dp + Di ]

This fluid velocity then has to be converted to the equivalent flowrate by using the
annular velocity equation, where:-

## fluid velocity (ft/min) =

24.5 Q
Dh2 Dp2

where Q = gpm

The change in pressure is then calculated for each annular/pipe section using the Pressure
Loss equations. This is calculated for both laminar and turbulent flow with the largest
value being taken.
The total swab or surge pressure acting on the bottom of the hole is the sum of all of the
pressure losses for each annular/pipe section.

## Use of the QLOG Swab and Surge Program

This program is used to determine the pressures induced by the defined maximum and
minimum running speeds of the pipe. Thus, a safe speed can be deduced in order to avoid
excessive pressures.
Required information:Bit depth and hole depth - read from the realtime system, editable if required.
Current surge/swab pressure - read from current recorded pressures, editable if
required.
Current Flow In - read from realtime system, editable if required.
Use Current Profile - ie current hole and pipe profiles, the user should select Y(es).
Maximum and Minimum running speed - limits defined by the user. Negative values
should be used in order to calculate swab pressures. For example, for surge pressure, the
minimum running speed may be 5m/min and the maximum 50m/min. For the same
limits, the swab calculation requires the minimum to be set at -50m/min, and the
maximum at -5m/min.
Current running speed - read from realtime system, editable if required.
Press F7 to calculate the maximum and minimum pressures.
Press F2 to print the data out.
Press F8 to produce a plot. The plot will be pressure against running speed and will show
the pressures against the max/min limits defined together with the current
pressure/running speed situation.

## This program accesses information from the realtime system.

Therefore:Enter the hole and pipe profiles from Exercise 1c into the realtime files.
Enter the following into equipment table

## a) Mud density override 9.3ppg

b) 600 and 300 50/30

Using maximum and minimum running speeds of 20 and 100 m/min, calculate the
swab/surge pressures with the following bit depths:

1000m
2000m
3000m
3500m
3950m

With an increased mudweight of 10.3ppg, calculate, for the same maximum and
minimum running speeds, the swab/surge pressures at 3500 and 3950m.

## Exercise 1a Use of Hydraulics Program

1. Laminar flow in all sections
System pressure loss 2038 psi
Surface pressure loss 59.6psi
2. 23.8 psi
3. 2.24 m3/min giving a pressure of 2498psi
4. 1 x 13mm, 2 x 14mm giving a pressure of 1994psi
5. 2162psi
6. 1 x 12mm, 2 x 13mm giving a pressure of 1983psi
7. Yes, flow is laminar in each section
8. 2.24 m3/min
9. 1 jet

## with 12mm jet washout, pressure would be 1658psi

with 13mm jet washout, pressure would be 1671psi

## Exercise 1b Optimizing hydraulics

1. 15.0% HP at the bit
2. Two possible situations are:a. Mud weight 9.9ppg
Flowrate 2.0 m3/min
Jets
2 x 10, 1 x 11
This gives 60.2% HHP at the bit
2771psi system pressure loss
Laminar flow in all sections with good annular velocities
b. Mud weight 10.15ppg
Flowrate 1.9 m3/min
Jets 3 x 10
This gives 63.9% HHP at the bit
2765psi system pressure loss
Laminar flows, but lower annular velocities

## Exercise 1c Optimizing Hydraulics

1. 3 x 10mm jets, giving system pressure loss of 2523psi
a) laminar in all sections
b) 55 to 92 m/min
c) 39.3 %
2. 3 x 14mm jets, giving system pressure loss of 2211psi
a) transitional around collars, laminar in all other sections
b) 63 to 105 m/min
c) 15.3 %
3. Using flowrate 1.3 m3/min
mud weight 10.3 ppg
jets 2 x 9, 1 x 8mm
system pressure loss of 2834psi
% power at bit 52.2 %
Laminar flows in all sections
Annular velocities 51 to 86 m/min

## Exercise 1d Equivalent Circulating Densities

1. 9.5 ppg
2. 1100 kg/m3
3. Phyd = 1976 psi
BHCP = 2226 psi
ECD = 10.7 ppg EMW
4. Phyd = 33844 Kpa
BHCP = 36844 Kpa
ECD = 1252 kg/m3 EMW

## Exercise 1e Swab/Surge Program

at 1000m, min/max pressure =
at 2000m,
at 3000m,
at 3500m,
at 3950m.

35 + 211 psi
50 + 280 psi
69 + 388 psi
77 + 426 psi
85 + 461 psi

## With 10.3ppg mud weight:

at 3500m, min/max pressure = 77 + 460 psi
at 3950m,
85 + 497 psi