Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PA#E-r
**Ftr
)j :':'::li
{nrr*ctrucing
Straregic
ManaSernent
In ThisChapterWeChaltengeyoulo
))>
1. Understand
whata strategy
isand identifythe
2. Understandwhy we studystrategic
management.
3. Understand
the relationship
betweenstrategyformulotion.
andimplementation.
4. Describethe determinantsof
competiti ve a dvantage.
5 . Recognizethe difference
between the fundamental
and dynamic views of
competitive advontag e.
*&-
ClickCtack
David Challenging
Goliath
/
Q/*"tue
yearsago,Kevinplankwasa walk-on
-_3-
pnnf ONE
Strategyand StrategicLeadershipin
DynamicTimes
a tailorto makeseveral
prototypeshirts.
Plank's
teammates
enviedhisnewshirts,
soheset
out to makemoresampres.
Heofficiaily
launched
hiscompanyout of hisgrandmother,s
basement
andcailed productunderRrmouro.
Asyou canseefronrthe snapshot
'l'1,sales his
in
Exhibit
in 2006were9430miilion,and
thecompany,s
equity
was
varued
at
over
5i '8 billion'1
with suchdominantincumbents
asNikeandadidas,
howdid planksuccessfullyenterand grow hiscompanyinto
one of the bestperfornring
companies
on warl
street?Apparentry,
at reastearryon,itscompetitors
did not heeuinder Armour,s
sawy
and mega-successful
advertising
campaign'titled,,click-clack:r
think
you
hear
us
com_
ing!"Although
UnderArmourhasbeensu-ccessrut
to oate,srr-,0*,[-'."0 othersdid not
standidlyby whilewatchingitscustomers
migrateto the newupstarr.
what canunder
Armourdo to maintainandgrowitsposition
in the industry?
Let,sfirsttookat the indus_
reviewUnderArmour's
strategyforentering
andcornperinq
in thisdynamic
ilyj:Tr?.-""
saso,osg006
57,300,000
1,800,000,000
R e v e n u eD i s t r i b u t i o n
Apparel
m e n ' s5 9 . 4 %
w o m e n ' s1 9 . 9 o %
youth 7.4%o
faolwear 6.2o/o
accessories3.5o/o
licensing revenues 3.602
grrnO,unOTruOaturt,
NYSETicker
(Wentpubticin August
200s)
KevinPlank'sVisifn
*-q{asqQwF
--
l^
-l
Chapter
The.Performance
ApparerIndustry UnderArmourparticipates
in tne sportsapparel
market,which
NPDGroup,a
leading
providerof
consumerand
retailmarketresearch
information,
estimated
wasa 545billionmarketin 2006.Approximately
30 percentof the
marketissyntheticprof,uctandpurchased
for usein activesportor exercise.While
one
mightalsumethat Nikedominates
the market,in factthe aciivesportsapparelmarket
isfragmented-10brandscombineto comprise
the top 30 percentof the market.
Historically,
exercise
clothingconsistedof productsmadewith relativelyunsophisticateddesignandgenericfabrics.The
mostcommonshirtusedin exercise
wasa standard cotton T-shirt,often decoratedwith logos and companyor
team names.In
segmentslike runningand basketball,
jerseysmadeof syn_
therewere specialized
theticfibersand tanktop designsthat improvedperiormance.
Lycraorevolutionized
sportswear
in the latetwentiethcentury,andthe microfibers
revolutionized
the marketlater.Fabrics
likefleeceandSympatex@
werespecifically
developed
for fluctuations
in weatherconditions.
lt is unlikelythat streetfashionwould haveadoptedthem so
readilyif therehadnot beenthe statusassociation
of sportingprowess.When
thiswas
combinedwith effective
functionalutility,a fabricfashion*ui bornthat encompassed
all agesfrom young skateboarders
to maturegolfers.Moisture-management
fibers
were developedto accommodate
the desirefor more comfortablesportswear.
Accordingto Dupont,who inventedcoolmax@
andTactelo,
functionis paramount.These
fibersareusedcommonlytodaynot onlyin sportsapparel,
but in otherproductsrangingfromsocksto lingerie.
Theperformance
apparelsegmentof thesportsapparelmarketisgrowingmorerapidly
thanothersegments.This
growthisfueledby demographic
trendsand increased
consumerawareness
andparticipation
in activelifestyles.
Duringthe pasttwo decades,consumershavecontinuedto spendheavilyin the areasof weightlossanddieting,fitness
centermemberships,and
sportsandathleticequipment.And
sportsenthusiasts
tendto
spendmorefor theirequipmentthancasualusers,which
translates
to the possibility
for
higherpricepointsandgreatermargins.
As upstartslikeUnderArmourin sportsappareland Sketchers
in specialized
footwear
havegainedstrongfootholdsin emergingsegments,
industrygiantslikeNikeandadidashavetakennoticeandresponded
in kindwith theirown specialized
products.
However,whilethe marketis largeandgrowingrapidly,
incumbents
in traditionalsegments
of the industryhavenot grownasrapidly.
UnderArmour'sEntry TheoriginalUnderArmourshirtthat KevinPlankdesigned
was
madeasa form-fittingcompression
usingmicrofiberthat wouldwick perspiration
away
fromthebodyanddryquickly.The
shirtS
heshared
withteammates
werea bighitandthis
led him to believetherewasa marketfor these"performance
shirts."He guessedthere
wouldbe a big marketfor hisshirtsamongprofessional
and amateurathletes
who,like
himselfwereirritatedby workingout in cottonshirtsbut continuedto do so sirpplybecausetherewerefew alternatives.
KevinPlankfiguredhehada winningproductthat was
quitedifferentfromcurrentproducts.
Hisproducthasthreedistinctfeatures.
First,the
fabricwicksmoistureanddriesquickly(asweat-soaked
cottonT-shirtcanweightwo to three
pounds).
Second,
Plankuseda compression
design-tight,form-fitting
cutsthat reduced
theamountof fabricandimprovedcomfortwhenwornundera uniform(andequipment
pads).Third,
likeshoulder
UnderArmourshirtsweremadewith a tagless
convendesign;
tionaltags
onthecollaroftenirritate
theneckof athletes.
Plankdesigned
a waytoheat-seal
the tag informationdirectlyto thefabricratherthanneedingto sewon a separate
tag.
With a superiorproductdesignedfor a specificmarket,Plankstillfacedthe issueof
how to get his productto market.Likemanyentrepreneurs,
he startedwith who he
panr oNE
knew-formerteammates
fromcotegeandprepschoor
whowerenowprayingin the
NFL'He figuredthar if he courd
professionar
9;i;;;"
athletefto usethe product,
teammates
wouldhoundthemfo"rtr'eirown
shirts,
much
likehiscollegeteammates
did at Maryland'
whiie working g",ii"J athletes
to.demand
r,i, proou.t,plankalso
went about securingwhoresare
""u,ia
.."ti'itaccounts.
Earry
NFL
prayerswho started
wearingUnderArmourshirts.incruded
fuarterbacks
Jeffc"orgu'unoFrankwycheck
(aformerMaryrand
teammat)andail o.
hailof fame,".ui*r r"rry Rice.In base_
ball,Rogercremensgot UnderArmou'oiting
""a
by beingan earryadopterof the new
isauaitart"
;"::1:?33;nXiJj,'#:u'
unol2,o*osportins
"'l',r,"Iniernet,-catarosi
Chapter
1 >:
Exhibit1.2 UnderArmour,s
CumulativeTotal
StockMarket
450
400
- rnO'
350
9, zso
E zoo
L)
"
100
|J__FiF
\lJIw:;-*
300
150
^ -d.1oU\,-""#
,r'oF-
_d:_"
Textile-APParet
ffi
NASDAQ
Market Index
50
:
:
UnderArmour,
Inc.
i).:r.os
-
100.00
214.89
381.08
100.00
11 3 . 0 0
1 3 172
NASDAQMarket Index
100.00
98.78
1 0 1. 8 2
assotechnologically
backwards.Analysts
posedthe question:,,How
wasthe doorleftso
wideopen(foryourentry)?"
Plank's
response
wastelling:"1
don'tknow,but ourjob isto
closethatdoor."He
wenton to commentthat nobodythoughtconsumers
wouldspend
525to $35for aT-shirt.
Heconcluded
by notingthatwhenyougivethe consumer
some
tangiblebenefit,
you'reableto reinvententireproductcategories.
Evidently,
assummarizedin Exhibit1'.2,
in itsfirstyearof tradingasa publiccompany,
wall streetappeared
\
to likePlank's
playsasmuchasconsumers
did.2
Whyaresomefirmsincredibly
successful
whileothersarenot?Andwhy is it that once
they'resuccessful,
sofewcansustaina highlevelof success?
Wearesurethatyouarefamiliarwith manyoncesuccessful
firms,thattodayno longerenjoysuchsuccess.
In this
text,we'llintroduceyou to the conceptsthat you'llneedto answerquestionsabout
gainingandsustaining
success
in theworldof business
competition.
<<<
T h r e e O v e r a r c h i n gT h e m e s
As you ve probably gatheredfrom the topic of this book-strategic managemenf-a firm's
performanceis directly relatedto the quality of its strategyand its competencyin implementingit. You alsoneedto understandthat concernsabout strategy,sometimesreferredto
policy,preoccupythe minds of many top executives.Their responsibility is to see
as business
that the firm's whole is ultimately greaterthan the sum of its parts-whether theseparts are
distinct businessunits, such as Under Armour's men's apparel and footwear,or simply the
functionalareasthat contributeto the performanceof'one particularbusiness,suchasUnder Armour's distribution through national sporting goodschains.Good strategiesare affected b5 and affect all ol the functional areasof the firm, including marketing, finance,
accounting,and operations.Thus, we'll also introduceyou to the conceptsand tools that
you'll need to analyzethe conditions of a firm and its industry, to formulate appropriate
strategies,
and to determinehow to implement a chosenstrategy.
* f oY
panr oNE
r.t]:i:T:,'A:*###H?:ghout
thisbookarecriticar
tc,trcvciopirrg
c.'rperency
inthe
:**r*:ri.,rmi*;iti;;iilH;j
j:".#:?
,U:F'::;:i,triff
;:Irffi:il:
to seeunderArn*rur,.,,,,-o.
u s'apshot
atone
isn,tthe*,r,","'ll"!i::*:.:::::Ji:Ti,ilF;lf
,.r.:,,j,,ff
*;*,.,.',.,::ff
What ls S t r a t e g i c M a n a g e m e n t ?
strategic management
Process
bywhicha firmmanages
rne
lorfiitlation
andimplementatiOn
of
a srategy.
L,naptef l
tntfo{rrlin!i
T p {g s T f f&
i y - s # { { L # & f fiiI $ t , sp * s 5 p f r
ilTAVF
Theword strategyisderived
fromthe Greek
st,ratego.s.
Roughlytransiatecl,
it means.,the
ge'eral'sview,"and thinking aboutmilitary
ranksuna ,.rpoirri'tiliti., i, onc way
to
focus
on
'-t:genera's
vie#
:}i.1t{ii:::j;'51
Cig
!to{ il;il
,i"rorsome
rower-iei,er
migh,besupp',,"*'.1$r1lffiTi!:#:.ffi
i:ffi'L::1fly,:i;li**::,.,'lh
the
.o--u,ra.
leneral's
r' b.,;-;r,
;;;;;;,,;-.T::::l*:$*XT?lJJr:Ti"iT:ffff:
W F { Ys T { J * } Y$ T R A Y S * Y ?
You may wonder why it is important to study strategywhen your
careeris unlikely to begin
at the levelof strategicleadership.From a practicaliiandpoint,
employersexpectyou to be
functionallyfluent in accounting,marketing,or someother
specialtation.l'hey alsoexpect
that you will understandthe "big picture"-strategic management
givesyou the toolsto understandand describethe big picture.If strategyis the meais by
whlch an organizationgoes
about pursuing its overarchingobjectives,then studying and gaining
an understandingof
the principles,theories'and-toolsof strategicmanagementwilibe an*important
aid fbr yoti
evenearlyin your career.This coursewill help you in severalareascritical
to your .u."..,
you will be in a better position to understandyour firm's objectives(or
what they shoulcl
be)' you will be equippedto analyzeand understandhow competitionwill
interferewith attaining your objectivesand what can be done to minimize thesethreats,you will
comprehend how effectivestrategy formulation and implementation requires comDlementarv
___-.,r_**r."*ltrr*e,
(A
J *
qe!?9!@@-@.@
10
panr oNE
Times
organrzationalresc
factorsmay be -,.'::t-t:-:"0
rors,ra,egi;;-,",jiiiti.lffi;:,1'fi
:',.,ilt*f
f *Tlii5,ft
;ii;..,ffif
requiresrhe coordinar..l
.oop..utio;;;;p.y"es
:fi:fj.1#il:1.
at al[lel.cl.sof th
*t*, *r'"ni,..-., i; a**,n*u,'a;;,;;;r,ns
srraresy.
rheyrery
opportunities.con:j;;'.;'d;:,i'Ji:#."#'J,Tr:::xT51*1
j:*:rmi;il[:.d
,1. *;;ffia
0o.., a.n"lii"r, ,i.;,;
means
,, thecoordinated
bywhichanorganization
p*ru., i* go"k
thusencom_
";;;;.i,"*ii'r,..,egy
;;""""J;;J.,n.i.,.o'. edrobetaken
|iffiil,.,fi:Ifi"r?',::il
by
*tx**"
",
Becausefirms
,,[,'_",fi
gi.1!;;;1;i",".;'4i,"[T:*i.::ri#iiJiilT:"Tfi
:1iil:i]il:?;X#;
are
M U 5 { r uSf f$i S T R A T E G Y
V E f tS U 5 C O R P O R A YS
f fTi $ * & ? . *Y&
fo -
C h a p t e r I : ' > I n t r o d u c i r ,S
g i r a t e c i cV a n a g e m e n t 1 1
owns NBC); and operatingself-storagefacilities.It deriveslessthan l0 percentof its revenue from aircraft engines.Within this industry, of course,both GE and Rolls-Royceface
the samecompetitivepressures,
suchasdetermininghow to competeagainsteachother and
suchrivalsasPratt &\A4ritney(the third-largestfirm in the industry).In managingits portfolio ofbusinesses,
GE facesstrategicissuesthat arelessrelevantto Rolls-Royce.
BUS|neSS Stfategy
What sort of issuesarethese?Businessstrategyrefersto the ways
a firm goesabout achieving its objectiveswithin a particular industry or industry segment.
In other words,one of GE'sbusinessstrategies
would be how it pursuesits objectiveswithin
the jet enginebusiness.This strategymay encompasssuchthings ashow it competesagainst
Rolls-Roycefor contractsfrom Boeingand Airbus, how it cooperateswith other suppliers
of technologyit usesin designingits engines,and the decisionto ramp up scalein an effort to reduceits costs.When Under Armour managersdecidehow to competewith Nike
for consumerdollars,they,too, are engagedin businessstrategy.Businessstrategy,therefore, focuseson achievinga firm's objectiveswithin a particular businessline.
Increasingly,businessstrategy also takes into account-the changing competitive landscapein which a firm is located.Two critical questionsthat businessstrategymust address
other companiesmay be comare (1) how the firm will achieveits objectivestoday,+'rhen
(2)
the
firm plans to competein the
how
peting to satis8/the samecustomers'needs,and
issues
related
to businessstrategy.
future. In later chapters,we'll focus specificallyon
Many firms are involved in more than one line of business.
COrporate Strategy
Largecorporationslike 3M and GE canbe involvedin dozensor hundredsof separatebusinessactivities.Under Armour startedwith a focus on men'sperformanceapparel,but has
expandedinto other apparel like footwear. Corporate strategy addressesissuesrelated to
tl_
businessstrategy iitiatsgy
l'r
r , , , r t i j . i i ; i i: i i 0 i t i l i i i i f a i S , . V i i h i f ia
illirisii'l
corporatestrategy
trr l
rt (
Strateqy
i i . i r , , i i l i r i r i l i i i l i r s i r l t l s s e s ,i 0 r
C0flilany
iliiliililll I irii lrr-r11
;1 ;,1111,-,nt
,ri.itr r,tiiiri; ia, iird lfilila!les
lts
; : , 1 1 l i 1 ; , .1r 1 i l i l S r i l a S : l i i sa. i l l d i C i
'' :'|'lrdrio
12
pmr oNE
three fundamentalquestions
sassociated
' r v L r o r L u with
w r t l n:
Illanaglng
acrossits.o*_.,.,#u#j:ffiJ#r_1,":nTJ:r"J.#Ii:::
units.UnderArmou
businesses"i;;;'"#;;iJ:,'i::'ffi
,#i::ffi1TiI:il:ll:i',?ffi
**i
Strategy F o r m u l a t i o n
and lmplementat!on
I
I
Earlierwe definedstrategyasthemeansbywhich
an organizationpursucsits goalsand obstrategyformulation process jectives.Strategy
formulation is the processof decidin"gwhat
ofdeveloping
toao; ,trut"gy lmplementa_
a strategy.
tion is the processof performing all ihe
activities n..."rru.y to ,10*lJrut lns beenplanned.s
Becauseneither can succeedwithout the other,
the two processes
are iterativea'd interdestrategyimplementation
pendentfrom the standpointthat implementation
shouldprovideinforn.rationthat is used
Process
ofexecuting
a strategy,
to periodically modify businessand corporate
strategy.our opering i.,ignettefocused
mostly on Under Armour's strategy.Howeu.r, as
the co"mpanyt o, g..-r"rr, it found that i'
order to implement this strategy,it had to invest
heavilyin o.gnniiational structure,systems,and processes.
The Under Armour examplealsoshowshow good strategies
representsolltions to complex problems'They help to solveproblemsexteinaltothe
ir- by enablingthc procluction
of goods or servicesthat bo-thtreatthe competition and
havea ready n'rarket.T'heysolve
problems internal to the firm by providing all employees,
incrutling r,f cxecutives,with
clearguidelinesasto what the firm should and snoutdnot be
doi.e.
$ T R A T n * Y p 0 R# $t i I * & Y ' Sr u
So now we know that strategyformulation meansdecidingwhat to
clo.Somestrategiesresult from rationaland methodicalplanning processes
baseJon ar.ralyses
of Soth internal resourcesand capabilitiesand the externalenvironment.Others emerge
over time ancl are
\ - -l L -
Chaptcr
ir
$
't:
4
6.
;{i
i*i
,fS,
s{.
:!&
:i
t3
13
14
Youmightbemore
familiar
withRolls_
Royce's
automobiles
thanitsjetengines.
tneta(tis,however,that
Rolls-Royce
PLC
nolonger
even
makes
luxury
automobilgs.
Ihecompany,s
core.
business
isnowjetengines.Jet
engines
generate
72percent
ofitsrevenues.
Goodstrat_
egyformulationmeansrefining the elements
of the strategy.ra
lLenieltlter,llrst of all, not to
confusepartof a strategy,-for example,
being a low-cost providcr or llrst mover in
an
industry-for strategyitself.Beinga loi-cost
provider or fi.st '.r,,.,.. 'iay lrepart of a strategy,but itt not a complete strategy.
As we noted earlier,a strategyis the meansby
which a firm rvill achier.errsgoalsand objectives.This is, of course,thi intended
strategy(referringback ro Exrribit 1.4),although
through this processmanagershave a good
.hun.. of shaf ing tl-terealizedstrategyas well.
In a for-profit firm, a businessstrategf wil
generallyaddiess"h.rvit will cornpeteagainst
its rivals and makea profit. For instance,if a-firm
hasan objecti'c ro bc ont- ol t5c top two
firms in a particular industry, this is a complex
objective.As result,il stratcgydesignedto
pursue this objectivewill consistof an integrated
iet of choices.
These.lrni."s can be categorizedasfive relatedelementsof strategyiur"d
on decisionstllat 'ranager-srnakeregarding arenas,uehicles,dffirentiators, stagiig, and.economic
logic.werctcr lo this constellation
of elements,which are..lyul to the sirai-egicmanagement
processoutlincclin Exhibit 1.3,
asthe strategydiamond.unfortunately, *"y
naive managersonly ibcus o1 one or two
such elements,often leavinglarge gapsin the overall
stratlgy. or, thc1.'ray rravealr five
pieces'but not understandhow they need to fit
together.oriiy *1.,.,' 1,,,,,huueanswersto
your questionsabout eachof these
five elementscan you determinen hetheryour strategy
is an integratedwhole; you'll also have a better idea
of the areasin u,hicir your strategy
needsto be revisedor overhauled.As Exhibit 1.5shows,
a good stratesydianond provides
answersto all five euestion5;ls
l. Arenas. Where will we be active?
2. Vehicles.How will we get there?
-/h-
O h a p t e rl
IntroducingStrategicMrnag"ment
15
3. Differentiators. How
will we win in the marketplace?
4' staging and pacing. \44'rat
win be our speedand sequence
of moves?
5. Economic logic.,How will
we obtain our returns?
Let'stake a closerlook at each
of tlese elements.
Arenas'By arenas'we mean
areasin which a firm will be
active.Decisionsabout a firrn,s
arenasmay encompassits products,
services,distribution ;;;";;;
market segments,
geographicareas,technologies,
and.*" r,.g"r
value-creationprocess.unlike vision
sratements'
which tend to be fairlygeneral,
"rthe
th?identification;f
beveryspecific:
It will clearly tell managers-hui
"*;;r;;rt
tL. n.- rioura urra ,no,rta 'o;;.;;
addition, because
firms can contract with outside
parties for everything r."^
.-pr";;;
r" manufacturing
services'the choice of arenascan
ie fairly nu..o*ty a.nrred for
some
firrns.
For example,Under Armour made
,il;;;1,
men,
women,
andchildren.
Histo
ricauy,
.* ;::i: ;:fr::TJr::lTTffi ;:iXi.i#;
recentlyexpandedinto Eyloge.^M"..
;.;;i;;ey_arso
targeted,r*r,'new
market seg_
ments and moved inro arhleric footwear.
rr,.i,.'in"i.
pr"lr.i,
pr#-'y
through sporting goodsstores.In addition to
theseur"rru .tjor..r, Under Armour
has entirely outsourced
the production of its products to
outsid;;;;;i;;._r,
mostly in Asia.
Vehicles vehicresare the means
for_participating
in targetedarenas.For insrance,
a firnr
that wants to go international can
tiut'ouJ..tirr. in different ways.
Under Armour
senttheir own personnelto Europe".hi.u.
to open tho.. op..utions.wal_Mart,
in recentmovesto
Exhibit1.5 TheBusiness
Strategy
Diamond
Arenas: Where will we be active
(and with how much emphasis)?
. Which productcateqories?
. Whichchannels?
. Which marketseqments?
o Which geographii areas?
.
core technologies?
. .Wl''i"lr
Which value-creatioristrategies?
Staging & pacing: What wiil
be our speed and sequence
of moves?
. Speedof expansion?
. Sequenceof initiatives?
Vehicles:How will we
get there?
o Internaldevelopment?
. Joint ventures?
. Licensing/franchising?
. Alliances?
. Acquisitions?
/t-
16
panr oNE
entercertaininternationalmarkets
(suchasArgentinaand China),
hasboth acquiredlocal
retail chainsand openednew
storeson it, o*., i,' order to g,,;,',
,rro." ,'mediate presence.
Likewise'a firm that requires
a new technologycould devel'p
ir through investmentsin
R&D. Or, it could opt toform
an ailian.e.r.,J
sessesthetecnnorogv,therebvacceler;;;;;:'i"Q:Tt::l':?l':Jiii:
resourcesand capabilities'Finally,
"tl,nt
it .ouli simplyLuy unut1r..t,,,-,,
o*n, the technology'In this case'then' the possible
vehiclesfo..nt.ri.rg a new are'a
include
acquisitions,alliances,
and organicinvestment.^d;;;;;:
differentiator Featureor
attribute
of a company,s
pioductor
(e,9..
servrce
rmage,
cust0mizafi0il,
recnnrcai
superjority,
price,
qualit,/
andreliabiljty)
thathetps
rtbeatrts
competitors
inthemafketplace,
Differentiators
T:Tffi
:,:,:il!.i{:"dJ:iH
ffi
il,,T:l'"T*.,ff
f#ilff#ilTT'ffi
that
herp
i'*ioJo rirm
scan
b.,;..*#ilTn:iffi:in':I;: i ::,L1ffi
:i j;:ff :
- l6*
Chapter
,:i
rii
.:
ir
.ii,
ii
{l
$;
.i:]'
S T R A T F G YI } VPI L i l M 6 r u ? A T N # E
r u- \f d
i f&
fiS
Whateverthe origin of a strategicidea,whether it was carefullyplanned from the outset
or evolvedover time by means of luck or experimentation,successfulstrategiesare dependent on effectiveimplementation.As discussedearlier in.the chapter,strategyimplementationis the processof executingthe strategy-of taking the actions that put the
strategyinto effect and ensurethat organizationaldecisionsare consistentwith it.ls The
-l+-
, : , ' : , , 1 i i t i l i J t a ii rl Ji j
staging
,-:::i
ari
economic logic
i,ri i::
[,k]iijtsLr.v
r r i r i i , t r r - i . i : i ifl . l : j i t a i e q y .
17
Woul,d
ft
f"J
6ru.
ffiu
performanceof
JetBlue
U.S.Airtines Market Share and profitabilitv
5.000
o.0}%6
*5.00o/o
-1O.0Oo/o
-15.OOc'/oE
-20.00%
*25.4O%
-30.00%
o
"t* s' -.ou* ,..-.o+d'^a-."
""-" ceo"
"-"
--r-
ooo"
.d
od@
,s$
J %".a-'
bo-
r /-'
t / v\ tc)
t
...c ..""
rt-"
',r,i
In what arenas does JetBlue
compete? Managementstatesthat
the companycompetesas a lowfarecemmercialair cafrier,and
catersto underserved
but
overpriceflU.S.cities.lts mainbase
of operationsis John F.Kennedv
airportin New YorkCity,which
servesthe largesttravel market in
the country.
Whaf vehicfes does JetBlue use to
enter the arenas in which it
competes? JetBluestarled from
scratchand has achievedall of its
groMh in flightsper day through
internalgroMh. The firm could have
grownby purchasingregional
airlines,but chosenot to.
I What are ifs differentiators? price is
a big part of JetBlue'sstrategyfor
winningnew customers,but it also
wantsto developthe imagethat it is
a low-fareairlinewith high-quality
service.Althoughit offersonlyone
classof service,the levelof service
is ratherhighfor a low-fareairline.
For instance,it offersleatherseating
and individualin-seatlivesatelliteW.
Thus,JetBluestatesthat it aimsto
createa new segmentin airlinetravel
basedon value,service,and style.
a How does JetBlue's staging-the
speed of its expansionand the
sequence of its grovvth initiativesreflect its timetable for achieving
its objectives?JetBluehas grown
from 1 route between 2 citiesto
routesthat seryemorethan 50 cities
in just 7 years.At first,it limiteditself
to the EastCoast(betweenits JFK
home baseand destinationsin
Floridaand upstateNew York),but it
soon proceededwestward,
establishing
locationsin the west.
Expansionin the east has filledin
manvmorecities,and destinations
When
former
5outhwest
Airlines
employee
andJetBlue
founder
David
(shown
Neeleman
aplane)
thathewas
evacuuming announced
launching
a newairline
people
company,
were
aghast.
Although
theairline
industry
asa
jetBlue
whole
islosing
money,
hasfound
a
waytoprosper
byeffectively
aligning
thefive
elements
0fitsstrateqy
thatisbothinternally
c0nsistent
dndexternally
generates
great
market
demand.The
strategy
includes
lowfarebutupscale
service,complete
withleather
seats
andsatellile
TV
t3_
airporttees.Locatingin secondary
locations(LongBeachinsteadof Los
AngelesInternational
Airporl,Forl
Lauderdale
insteadof lViami)also
-averageairport
meanslower,than
fees.On the rcvenueside,although
JetBlueoffersverylow fares,it wins
customerslrorr c--onrpetitors
and
usesits low-costincentiveas a
meansto convennon-fliers
to
JetBluecustorners.
lt hasalso
attractecl
customersby concentrating
on underserved,
high pricedroutes.
As a result,it now boaststhe highest
loadfactorof any rriqorairline.
As you can see,walkingthrough
JetBlue'sstrategydiamondhelps
illustrate
its slraleqi.l lrc planlooks
sound,but whai is requiredto
implement
suclr:r plan?The next
sectionsof this chapterprovidean
overviewof this criticalissue.
20
pmr
oNE
in Dynamic Times
through
earlv
impleme'rar;.,u 'rhegoar
ofimil:tr Trt"Ttrl.}:';li1'"vailable
"ir,,,r,
ffi To makesurethat strategy
formulatio'is
comprehensiveancrrve, irtorrncd
m ro tianslategood ideas
into actionsthat can be executecr
(ar<i so.ictirnesto useexecu*
tion to generateor identif, good
ideas)
In sports'a coach'splay-calling
is.only asgood asthe excellence*,ith
r,vhichthc playersexecuteit' Likewisein business:
The valueof u fr.-t strategyis a.i.r,rrr".i
Lrvrtsability to carry
tt out"'Any strategy,"saysMichael
Porter,o.r. oitrr. p..iminent wfirers
on
the subject,.... . is
onlyasgoodasits execution."2.Adds
peterDrucker,
orr. orou. nr.r.ilr.irir,. *.iters on man_
agement:"The important decisions,
the decisionsthat really 'rartcr, are
strategic.. . . [But]
more important and more difficult
is to make.ff..ti.,,. the course,;;.;;r,
decidecr
upon.,,2l
strategyimplementation
is usuallystudieJinu.rrrn.r, schoolgracluate
courses,
and
it,sthe
subjectof hundredsof booksin business
schoollibrari.r. w" au,rlti,r*,ra ,,, supprant
the
resultsof all of this study,
w1 do want y.r ;;;*,
on the i'rplicarior.rs.,r a very basicfact:
lut
'f
*i n*.fii imptementatiin
arcirrcxtricabty
I!:
!,,::,:": of;trutrsr
rinked.
rhe
!;1?y::r"
nve elements
strategv,
for instance,are related to t ott-rfornrulation
a'd
impiementation.
Good implementation'meansthat an
organizationcoordinatesresourcesand
capabilitiesand
usesstructure,systems,processes,
and strategicleadershipto tra'slate n.i"tit,".ut.
rtrategyinto
a reakzedstrategyand to positivebottom-liie
results.Throughout ;: i;; rvehelp you to
see
the relationshipbetweenformulation
u"a mfr"-.ntation. chapter 2 int*rduces
you
to
the
role of strategicleadership'and chapter
t I drills Jown much deeperinto .ur i,rplernentation
fiamework.At this point, and.in o1de1to
rr"tp fo,r^.onsiderthe con.rprcxityof imprementing
a
strategy'we introduce you to just the basic
ideasof strategicleadershipand irr.rpleme'tation.
To implement strategies'organization
leadershave-n.,me.ousle.vcrsat their clisposal.
The framework summarizing theselevers
is shown in Exhibit I.7.:r \vc categorizethese
leversinto threebroad categories:(l) organization
structure,(2) systerns
a,t7 processes,
and.
(3) peopleand rewards.The strategist
useJthesetoolsto t.rt rn. niii.,n,t-nr,ivhic6 is the
need
for all of the firm's activities to co-rnplement
eachother and sul4rort trr. ,t..t.eo,.
Exhibit1.7
lmplementation
Framework
lmplementationLevers
r Organizational
structure
. Systemsandprocesses
. Peopleandrewards
Strategic Leadership
. Lever-andresource-allocation
decisions
. Developsupportamongstakeholders
- 20*
C h a p t e r 1 > ) _ I n t r o d u c i n gS t r a t e g i c
Management
In addition' strategicleadershipengages
in a few activitiesrelatedto implernenting
the
strategythat are unique to their positiln'at
authority. e. tn.
r,,gg..,r, implementation includesthe activitiescarriei
out by the organizationthat"*rriuii
areaimedat executinga particular strategy'often, the strategythut
i. ,.utir.a through theseimplementation
efforts are
somewhatdifferent from the origi.rut
plan. IJeaily, thesl deviatio;:;;_
the
originar
plan
are a result of explicit alterations of th.
,t.ut.gy that result f.o* r..aiu.k during
early implementation efforts as well as from
the .*pioitatio' of serendipitous opportunities
that
were not anticipatedwhen the strategy
was formulated.
organization
Structure
structure is the manner in which responsibilities,
tasks,
and peopleareorganized'It includesthe
organization'sauthority, hierarchy,units,
divi.sions,
and coordinating mechanisms.At this poirit,
we just need to ,.rnirrd ourr.lu", of a
few key
questionsthat managersmust consideiwhen
imllementi"g u ,trut.gy,
m Is the current structure appropriate
for the intended strategy?
x Are reporting relationships and
the delegationofauthority set up to execute
the strategic plan?
n Is the organization too centralized (or
decentr
S T R A T F G I {I " S A D H & $ f f i i P
Strategicleadershipplays two critical roles in successfulstrategy
implementation, and it is
important to highlight them here so that you can incorporate"th.i.rro your own assessment of a strategy'sfeasibility as well as ensurethat you include
theseroles in your implementation plans. Specifically,as will be discussedin greater
detail in Chapter ll, strategic
leadershipis responsiblefor (1) making substantiveimplementation
lever and resourceallocation decisions and (2) developing support for the strategy
from key stakeholders.
Kevin Plank at Under Armour obviously spendsa lot of time Jeciding
what needsto be
done, such as which new products to launch next, which markets to
enier, and which suppliers and distributors to ''se.However,he also spendsa significant
amount of time talking
to analystsat largeu.S. brokeragefirms, mutual funds, and pension funds.
why? Becauseh!
must keepthesekey financial stakeholdersand shareholdersabreastof what
Under Armour
is doing so that they retain confidencein the firm.
A successfulstrategyis not generallyformulated just by a single person
or a small
group ofleaders.Strategicleadershiprequiresinvolving the right p.opi. in critical
decisionsbecausekey information may be widely dispersedwithin the firm. In addition, successfulstrategyimplementation requires activeleadershipto ensurethat what emerges
and what is realizedare desirableand that neededchangesof courseare detectedbefore
it is too late.
21
22
paet oNE
u,ill
achier.erts objectives.we
ord. ?s
business
or..o1i3y,irsobjectivcs
*,ill
encompass
l""f..J#:J:rl#,i successfulat sellingproducts
se'erauy
or ser'ict's t. customers.Because
vir-
jec
tive
s,"a,-*l'
i:r:l".T#ff ::;Tf,,j;.:I :ff**,j: *fil., .;T;
competition'
iTi::
Thus,the
conceptof str"r.gy ,rgg.rts
a rerationsrripbcliveenstrategyon
one hand and performanceand
the
.o-p.rIri r. advantageo' th" ,ltir.r.
specifically,we ex_
plained that a strategy.encompasses
the pattern of aciions take, b1..
a firm to achieveits
:l**:,lfi::ilff"l:{;;;
;i;;;; .o,'.r.,,,o'',
i'i.,,.,,'i,,.,
orstrategic
man-
iveadvantage;;;,;:i^i?'*.ffi:t::,:ii;!:#;,,::,:,:'*,:,:;!K,,:
competitiveadvantage A
irrlls abiiily
jna wav
tocreale
value
thatitsrivalscannot
M S Y X fEt SI h X S . T TO
$ F C O MP F T I T I V HA f f W
i A r u T &J#l i
Thefield of strategicmanagement
0n explanationsfor contpetitivcadvantage-ot the
focuses
reasonswhy companiesexperienceabove- und b.lo*-.rormal
rates of returns. In other
words,strategicmanagementofferstheoriesand models
that help us uncicrstandwhy some
firms perform betterthan others,and more to the point,
offersnranacerstools to help their
-72-
C h a p t e r 1 > > I n t r o d u c i n sS r r a t e g i cM a n a g e m e n t
23
firm-obtain a competitiv-e.advantage
and perform better than the competition. Generally
speaking,as summarizedin Exhibit r.g, there are three
primaryp.rrp..tir... on this issue
(perspectives
that, as we shallsee,reflectcontrastingbri.o-pt.-.rro.y
points of view):
m Th: internal perspectivefocuseson resources
and capabilitiesas internal sourcesof
uniqubnessthat allow firms to beat the competition.
ffi The externalperspectivefocuseson the structure
of industries and the ways in which
firms can position themselveswithin them for competitive advantage.
n Tlre dynamicperspectiue,whichbridges the internal
and external perspectives,is a third
view of competitive advantage.This view helps explain why competitive
advantagesdo
not typicallylast over long periodsof time.
Let'sexamineeachof theseperspectives,
or theories,more closely.
The. Internal Perspective
The first of the two fundamentalperspectrves
on competitive advantageis an internal one. It is often cailed the ,rrourrr-iorri
view of thefirm.
Thisperspectivesuggests
that no two firms areidenticalbecausethey possess
resourcesand
capabilitiesof different qualities. The advantagegoesto the firms wiih s,-rpeno,
resources
and capabilities.Proponentsofthis theory arguethat a firm gainsan advantageby
obtaining valuableand rare resourcesand developingthe capabiiity to utilize these resources
to drive customerstoward their products and servicesai the expenseof competitors.As a
result, firms with superior resourcesand capabilitiesenjoy competitive advantageover
other firms.27This advantagemakes it relatively easierfor these firms to achieveconsistently higher levelsof performancethan competitors.Competitive advantage,therefore,
ariseswhen a company'sresourcesallow its products,services,or businesses
to compete
:->
-_72
------)
24
pmt
Times
successfully
againstrival firms in the sameindustnes.
Accordingto this perspective,
the objectivefor managersis to determine
what resourcesand .apnb;'iitie.s
olfer tire most potential value'to acquirethem ifthey-are lacking,
and then to reveragcthosespecilicresources
in executingthe firm's strategy.The resourci-based
view alsoh,,tc1s
that a firm,s bundle of
resourcesmay either hinder or help its
entry into new busirresses-,r,ricleathat we,ll
explore further in later chapters.zs
The External Ferspective
rhe secondfundamental pc-rspectrve
o' competitive
advantagecontendsthat variationsin firms'competitive
advantager
and performanceare
primarilya function of industry attractiveness
anithe positio, nI,ll.,n, *,it.hinthe industry
relativeto competitort'Tl".: this external
perspectivesuggests
that compctiti'e advantage
comesfrom a firmt positioningwithin the
competitivebusinessc^,iror.r'ent.
The seminalwork supportingthis upprou.h
is Michaerporter,srvorkon competitive
strategy'2ePorter's theory-sometimes called
industrial organization eronomtcs(I/o
economics)-suggeststhat firms should do one
of two thlngs: 11) position themselvesto
competein attractiveindustriesor (2) adopt strategies
that wili niakctheir currentindustries
more attractive'In somecountries,for instance,
carmakerslobby fbr import tarift'sin order
to make their domestic markets more attractive.\A/hen
th. ,tr.t.g1. ,..,,,.Lr,tt accessof foreign manufacturersto the market is limited, and
the costof parti"Jipatingrn it" is higher.(In
later chapters,we'll explorein more detail the theoretical
mocielsancltools that help managersanalyze,understand,and shapea firm's competitive
enviror'ne'ts. )
The Dynamic Perspective
In addition, the two funclanrentalperspectives
that focus on internal and externaldeterminantsof competitiv"
ud.runtog.,some inclustriesor
market segmentsarelessstablethan others.Not surprisingly,
cor.npctitive
advantageis more
likely to endure in stablemarkets than in unstable*.r.
ionu..r.iy, th. competitive advantage held by one firm over another tends to changevery
slowly ir stirblemarkets but more
quickly in unstableones.As a resultof current or possibiefuture
changes in the comDetitive
e.nvironment,
strategies
needto be dynamicin natur".The gre.rtcrrr,i rl.gr..
i;
the environment'the greaterwill needbe the dynamismof the stratesv.
"i.h;;;;
The globalchocolateindustry,for example,is a relativelyrtrl,l..uuiro,rrnent
because
a
fs\ / fi1rns-notably, M&M/Mars, Nestl6,and Hershey- dominate it in
tcrms of both size
and brands.In addition, demandfor chocolateis relaiivelystable,grorving
with population
growth. To stimulate growth, large companiestry to formulate ,-,.,rv
candy bars-.However,
this type of growth is rather incremental and predictable.Sinallcr conrparlles
carve out
nichesin which to offer differentiated products, but this generallydocsnot result
in any significant upheavalof marketposition.In suchstablecontexts,funciamentaltheories
of competitiveadvantageusuallyexplainmost economicfacts.The external(or positional)
view of
strategytends to dominate questionsof strategyformulation ancl inrplementation.
Why?
Because
a firm's current market position,asgaugedby marketshareor sonreother criterion,
may be a good indicator of competitiveadvantageand providesa relativelyaccuratepredictor of future performance.This view alsotendsto assumethat industriesareclearlydefined.
that competition is predictable,and that the f'uturedoesn'thord nra'1,sr-rr.pri565.
Rut what about dynamic industries-such as computer chips or lase-rprinters or medical products-in which it seemsthat competitive advantagecan shift in a matter of
months or evendayssimply becauseof a new product releaseor somc other technological
breakthrough?30
A so-calleddynamicperspective
on competitiveadvantagchasbecomeincreasinglyimportant in explainingthe economicfactsin suchindustriesin which markets
converge,technologiesrapidly changecompetitiveconditions,capitalmarkctsbecomeincreasinglyimpatient, firms competein multiple marketsand rnulriplc industriesagainst
common rivals,and the costsof establishinga competitiveposition soar (and so increase
*z\-
Chapter I
- , I n t r o d u c j n oS t r a t c g i c
Management
serrisnot".;;;il:'".'::l'.'ffi:Iil,ffi
HI::Tff
:::;::l*fuI*::#i
congequently,as th"ecompetitive
ervironment changer,
l;;;;.
-uy u" past leaders,
new entrants'or prior incumbents
""*
who arebetterpositioned
for
the
future
stateof thc in
dustry'From the dynamicperspective,
r" toot to the pastf- .;;;;""t
how the firm ar
rived at its current position u,td
to tn. ruiu.. in an effort to predict
the look of the '.r,
competitivelandscape.
The Externar Dimension of the
Dynamic perspective of course,
the dynamic stratcg'
perspectivehasboth externaland internal
dimensionsaswelr.on the external
side,it,s useful in analyzing"high-velocity"mark.ts-markets
thar
.t;;J;;
rapidry
and unpre_
dictably':t often, such changes.erurt
"..
f.om t*rrq"r"g| ;;;
#."d
the
personal
music
player marker has seenrremendous
upheavalin th. ,iutus q;;;;rd
formats
replaced
analog devices.However,aswe noted
earlier,tn*. u.. ,rliil;;i.""tributing
factors.
The dynamic perspectiveis also a
good tool for examining industries
characterized
br,.
multimarket competition-those in ,irri.rr
nr-, tend to encoi.rnterthe samerivals
in
m'l
tiple markets.32
Goody.ear,
Michelin, and Bridgestone,for instance,
competehead_to_heacJ
in tire markets around the world. Another
rorl or -utti-".k.;;;;;edtion
is ilustratecl
by Nestl. and Mars; thesecompani.s
buttle li out in global industriesranging
from per
foods to snackfoods and will oft.n .,."
..ro.,*., from one industry to bolster
competitivcposition in another-s:y, by offering
retailerd1co11ts
exchangefor.sherf
il;;ll;
spacefor snackfoods.For instance,Froctor
& Gamble,s""
entry into vi;;""- appearsto bc
lessdriven by the profit motive (p&G tends
to losemoney o' vi"irru-.se soapsares)
than
by a determinationto keeprival unilever in
check.If p&i had not enteredthe vietnamese
market,UnilevercourdhavereapedmonoporyJike
profits
to usethe win.fall to pay for competitive efforts ugurnst p&G
in other""d;;;;;d
markets. By competing with
Unilever in a market in which it hasnolompetitive
advantagefuni *uy rrot evenseeko'e),
P&G's strategyreducesUn'evert ability to'wage
war on other fronts.
The Internal Dimension of the Dynamic Perspective
The dynamicperspectivecan also
help us to focus on a firm,s resourcesand
capabilities,particulu.fyiiror" that lead to a
continuousllow of advantages
in resourcesor market position and those tlrat
strengthenthe
firm's ability to embrace (and even foster) continuous
and sometimes disruptive change.
Risk taking, experimentation, improvisation, and
continuous t.u.rrir.g are-at least from
the dynamic perspective-key feaiuresof successful
firms. Later in theiext, we will explore
severalrelevant analltical tools for shaping strategy
formulation. you'll also learn how tcr
combine your analysisof an industry's cumirlativetechnological
clevelopme't with your assessmentof whether a firm can exploit an innovative
prodrl.t or disruptive technology
through its entire life cycle or whether it must instead
leap fro- p.ocu.t to product at
strategicallydefinedcrossoverpoints.
As suggestedby our opening vignette on under Armour,
note that the dynamic perspec_
tive also provides valuableinsight into the formulation and
impleme.rtuiion of strategiesat
firms competing in ostensibly stable markets and industrier.
F.* ob..ru.rs classifiedthe
men's athletic apparelmarket as a dynamic industry. while
there were many competitors i'
various segments,Nike wasviewed asthe Goliath of the industry
that leclmuch of the innovation of new products' Under Armour enteredthe industry
witl an innovatlve product targetedat an underservedmarket. Under Armourt compression
performance wear products
*"1:
to generatesignificant price premiums over incumbenis'products (remember,g25
{].
to $35for a T-shirt).yet,while the creationand designof the
conceptwasproprietaryto un_
derArmour, they usedoff-the-shelf technologyfrom third-party suppliers.
consequentry,in
- L5-
25
26
penr oNE
order to successfully
enterand capitalizeon his idea,
Kevin Plarrlincecjccl
to be ableto mar_
shalorganizatt:lit-1*:tt:,ts to
implemart his plan and goin ,-,,,.n
., sharebcforehe awoke
the giant incumbents'By the time
und., Armour upp"*.a n,.,N;t..,,
ancladiclas,radar,
had alreadycreatedand was in position
it
to defenda rather clon
formance
apparel
you;1ft;; thesame
segment.
,r,.-".i,,,i.,,-:|'',ll].liT:l,ljl,'j].:H
H_
versus
major steelprotluccrs.,.,
.\l s*&,n"r-$"ai_4ffii"
r f,a-e?31 n* *'r.6r q_Jg f,-tfu ^ T $ ^
&-r
y "*ff L*E3ffigg#y3
{y#"q
ryF&& *o
*.ffpq&*-6*}l
J
I' understand what strategyis and
identfu the dffirence between
business-Ievelandcorporate-leu't't'ot'iy'
sta;;g'ic-management
is the processby which a firm manage'int
ro'-Jtntio.r u.rd i.nplementationof its strategy'A strategy
is the central,integrated,
externallyoriented conceptof how a fiim
will achieveits objectives' Strategiestypically take one of tlvo
forms: businessstrategy
or corPoratestrategy'The objectiveof a business
strategy,isto spell
out how the firm plans to compete'This plan
integrates-choices
regarding arenas(where the firm will be active),
vehicles(how it will
get there)'differentiators(how it will win),
staging(the speedand
sequenceof its moves)'and economiclogic (how
it obtainsits returns)' The objectiveof corporatestrategy
is to spell out which
businesses
a firm will competein' how ownership bi the
corporate
parentaddsvaluetothebusiness'andhowthisparticulardiversification approachhelps each businesscompete
in its respective
markets.
2. Understandwhy we study strategicmanagement.
It should be
clear to you by now that strategic managementis
concernedwith
firm performance. Strategic management holds clues
as to why
firms survive when performance suffers.Strategyhelps
you ro un_
derstandwhich activities are important and why and how
a plan,
absentgood execution,is perhapsonly asvaluableasthe paper
it,s
printed on.
3. Understand the relationship between strategy formulation
and
implementation, Strategyformulation is the determination
of
what the firm is going to do; strategyimplementation is how
the
firm goes about doing it. These trvo facets of strategy are linked
and interdependent.This interdependenceis made strikingly clear
by the strategicmanagement process(Exhibit 1.3) you are intro:duced to in this chapter, examples throughout the text, and the
*2b --
Chapier
[ ,
Fi
27
R e v i e wQ u e s t f o * s
1. \{hat is strategicmanagement?
2. \44rat are the key components
of the strategic management
process?
3. Horv doesbusinessstrategy
differ
E x p e r i e n t i aActivities
t
Grcup ffixerci**s
i. Identifr the characteristicsof a firm
that the membersof your
group would like to work for and try
to identi$, an exampleof
this type of firm. Whatt the difference
b.r*..r, busrnessand
corporarestrategyat this firm? How might
that affectyour ex_
penencesand opportunities in that organization?
Use your
knowledge of the firmt strategy to construct
a high_impact
job application cover letter ro apply
for a job with this firm.
2. How is internationalexpansionrelated
to businessand cor_
porate strategy?Identi$r a firm that may
be thinking of ex_
panding into new international markets.
Apply the staging
element of the strategy diamond to the firmt
international
expansion opportunities or plans. Which markets
should it
target first and why?
ffithi*ai [3*h.eltes
1. Shouldethicsbe a forrnalanrl erplicir
part of strategyfor_
mulation and impiementation?\\,hat
ivould you do to
achieverhis type of objective?
2. For manyofthe firms yor: rvill srrrtlvin
this class,competitive
advantageis measuredtry sonrc {irrnr of tlnancial
profitabil_
ity. How should you evtrluatcc.thiciriciroices
in terms of ac_
counting costsand benefits?
-v
L1--
28
paat oNE
Endnotes
1. Under Armour, Inc., 2006
Annual
Report.
2. Under Armou r, Inc., 2006
Annual Report.
3. J. pfeffer and R. I. Sunl:,
T!:.Kno.wtng Doiig Gap: How
Smart ComOof
* owl
::: rffri,
,,What
:i-X.0o.,..
Is Strategy?,,
Haryard BusinessReview 74:6(1996),
i"XT;i:il:i'ramic
Havea Strategy?"
Academy
ofMa"og"ir"r nrri'iiiriniroorl,
nu_rn.
fron.r
wu.r.",.
unl
ol,,
iifi;i,
J;,,Jl,lli ^ll li1l,,,
l,i{lll:,,,,,,,:l:ff
reau of Tiansportation,Transitats;J,
Tl,;:l
l?tJ,,rr..:,
.,-,",;,,;;,;;;i",r.bts.gov.
20. M. F. Portet "Knolvyour place:
ILrrl l9.,\sscssthc Attractiveness
YourInduslryandYourCompan,v,s
of
l)osi{irin
i n 1 1 , , . l r r . , S t l r t e n t bl 9e9r l , 9 0 .
ThePracticettf t\Tttnst'rttttrt
iN.v \irrk: Harpercollins,
iirrl,lr?:$:r'
22. Adaptedfrom D. Hambrick
anrl A. Cannelh,.,srrategyImplementa_
tl;irl:;:l#ce
andselling,"
A,,,,,1,1,,'u",,'tr^'iu,,,i;;:,::,,
Executive
3:4
uu*o,n,ou,r:;,;';; ;,:n,,"i,;:iil']?::l,lTi:ii":
X:;;:if;:,
' ,
A d v a n t a g cT h r o u g hp e o i l e l B o s t , , n :
"
I llt: j,r,., I;,; I',
24. S. Kerr,"On the Follv of
RewardingA, \\,hile Iloping I for L),,,
Academy
of ManagementJournal ig:4 (1975),76"9_;_8 "' ""r"''ir.
i
25. j. B. Barney,"F-irmResources
ard Sustaincd(bnrpctitive Advantage,,,
Journalof Managementt7 :t ( 1991 99_I
: I ; r,i.,q. p,..i"i"|,,The Corner),
stonesof CompetitiveAdvanraq^e:
A.llesoLrrceR,,r.d i;;;;
StrategicMan_
agementlournal 14:3(1993),I7g,t9t.
26. R. R. Wiggins and T W,1l:11i, ..Sustirinctl
(lmpetirrvc Ach.anrage:
TemporalD;.namicsand the Inciclence
and ircrsistcrrtlc
of SuperiorEconomic Performance,,,
OrganizationSr:ietttt.I
,,i iiix,:i'si_ ros.
27. Barney,"Firm Resources,and
Sustaincri( _onrpi:titiveAdvantage,,;
Peterai "The cornerstones c",,p;,i
;.,:'A;,;;i;f,:';
'A
wernerfelt,
"f Fir.,,,
ResourceBasedView of the
t,;:*;;.il;;;;;i:
ttrcntJournat5:2
( 1 9 8 4 )i,7 l _ 1 8 0 .
28. Peterai "The Cornerston-es
of (lonrpctjtjrt Aclvantrgd,;C. A. Montggmery_andS. Hariharan, ..Diversificd't4,,,,,ri,,,, t,,'i.lrge
"", lstablished
Firmsl' Journalof EconomicBehayi,,
r i, I f jqqii, 7 r,9q.
29. M. Porter,CompetitiveStrategl(Nov
).crrk: Irrecl)rc.ss,
1980).
30. C. M. Christensen,TheInnovator,sl)ilt:tttnt:
llTlcrrArcry.lbchnologies
CauseGreatFirn s to lhll (Boston:Harr-rnl
llusint.,ss
School,t ress,tllT).
31. Brown and Eisenhardt,Competntgort tlt(
lrltL..
32. /. Gimeno and .C.Woo, ..Multin.rarkct(_-ontirct,
llconorntesof Scope,
and Firm Performance,',Amdemy of lrln,,,,,qrr,,r,r't-lurrl,.,)'t
nr,l tlgg|),
239*259.
33. Christensen,TheInnovator\ Dilenntu.
7g*