You are on page 1of 1

John Smith

10 Smith Street
VIC 3333

Senior Constable Iva Radar

Smithville Traffic Management Unit
1 Copper Street
VIC 3333

28th February 2006


Re: Infringement Notice 23456789

Dear Iva Radar,

I am in receipt of your reply dated 10th February 2006, reference XXXXXXX.
It seems that my request (copy attached) has been misunderstood. I have
neither requested a review of the infringement notice, nor have I lodged an
objection. I have simply indicated that I would accept your claim for value on
verification of the basis of your claim. I am quite prepared to pay the fine, if
indeed I am legally obliged to do so.
To ascertain that the alleged infringement notice is warranted in this case, I have
asked that proof of claim be provided that the speed measuring device allegedly
used on this occasion has been pattern approved to certify that it measures in
Australian legal units of measurement as set out under the National
Measurement Act 1960 and related Regulations.
It should be a very simple matter for anyone making a claim against me to
provide verification that their claim is supported by the laws that govern legal
metrology in Australia. If you were able to provide legitimate proof of claim by
way of documentary evidence that the speed measuring device complies with
Australian legal metrology law, then I would be able to decide whether
payment of the fine, a request for review or a contest in court is the appropriate
course of action.
I ask again that you, or someone with the appropriate authority, review my
original request (copy attached) and provide the required response.
Should the required response not be provided within 14 days from receipt of
this Notice, it shall be agreed and accepted that no such proof is able to be
provided and that the matter is settled and closed.
Yours sincerely,

John Smith

1 of 1