IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
PAUL HARD, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT BENTLEY, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Alabama; LUTHER JOHNSON STRANGE, III in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Alabama; CATHERINE M. DONALD in her official capacity as the State Registrar of Vital Statistics; STEVEN L. REED in his official capacity as Probate Judge for the County of Montgomery; RICHARD I. LOHR, II, Administrator of the ESTATE of CHARLES DAVID FANCHER; Defendants. §§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ Civil Action No.: 2:13-cv-922-WKW
MOTION TO INTERVENE
Richard I. Lohr, II, (hereinafter “Lohr”), as the Administrator of the Estate of Charles David Fancher, and his counsel of record, the law firm of Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis and Miles, P.C. (hereinafter “Beasley Allen”), pursuant to F.R.C.P. 24(b), request this Court for permission to intervene for the limited purpose to allow Lohr and Beasley Allen to pay the disputed settlement proceeds in the sum of $552,956.69 into the Court, and as grounds therefore, show the Court as follows: 1. Lohr is the Administrator of the Estate of Charles David Fancher, deceased. Lohr prosecuted a wrongful death action entitled
Richard I. Lohr, II, Administrator of the Estate of Charles David Fancher v. Joseph Zehner, III, No. 2:12-cv-00533-MHT
Case 2:13-cv-00922-WKW-SRW Document 74 Filed 02/23/15 Page 1 of 6
(hereinafter the “underlying action”). The underlying action arose out of a three vehicle wreck which resulted in the death of Charles David Fancher in August 2011. The case settled and was subsequently dismissed on July 25, 2014. (Doc. 297 of the underlying issue). 2. Prior to the underlying action resolving, Lohr received notice that Paul Hard was claiming he was entitled to a “spousal share” from any potential settlement monies pursuant to Ala. Code § 43-8-41(2). In accordance with Alabama’s wrongful death statute, Lohr, as the Administrator of Charles David Fancher’s Estate, had the exclusive authority to bring a wrongful death action. Ala. Code § 6-5-410(a). In addition, as administrator, he must distribute any settlement monies recovered pursuant to Alabama’s laws of intestate succession. Ala. Code § 6-5-410(c)
; see
also Steele v. Steele, 623 So. 2d 1140, 1141 (Ala. 1993)
(“The damages from a wrongful death award pass as though the decedent died without a will”). Alabama law of intestate succession specifies how any settlement proceeds are to be distributed to heirs or family members of the deceased. Ala. Code § 343-8-40. § 43-8-41 of the Alabama Code sets forth what amount the deceased’s surviving spouse is entitled to under various circumstances. Specifically, § 43-8-41(2) provides that if there are no children, but there is a surviving parent or parents, the surviving spouse is to receive the first $100,000.00 in value plus one-half of the balance of the intestate estate. As acknowledged by Paul Hard as of the filing of this action and at the time of settlement of the underlying action, Alabama law did not recognize him as the “spouse” of Charles David Fancher.
Case 2:13-cv-00922-WKW-SRW Document 74 Filed 02/23/15 Page 2 of 6
3. After receiving notice, Lohr executed a Stipulation and Agreement with Paul Hard on February 4, 2014, in which Lohr, in his capacity as Administrator of the Estate of Charles David Fancher, agreed that he would not distribute any settlement monies Paul Hard would be entitled to receive if he was determined to be the “spouse” of Charles David Fancher pursuant to Ala. Code § 43-8-41(2) until the dispute was resolved. (Stipulation and Agreement of February 4, 2014 attached hereto as Exhibit “A”). 4. Charles David Fancher was survived by his mother, Patricia Fancher. She claims that she as the mother of the deceased, is entitled to the disputed settlement amount as Alabama law does not recognize Paul Hard as the surviving spouse. After the underlying case resolved through settlement, both Paul Hard and Patricia Fancher, through their respective counsel, requested that Beasley Allen maintain the settlement amount in dispute
1
in Beasley Allen’s interest bearing account until it was determined “who” is entitled to the disputed settlement proceeds. (Letter Agreement of September 12, 2014 attached hereto as Exhibit “B”). 5. On or about February 9, 2015, the undersigned received correspondence from one of Paul Hard’s attorneys demanding that Lohr and Beasley Allen release the money in dispute to Hard’s attorney. (Sam Wolfe’s Letter of February 9, 2015 attached hereto as Exhibit “C”). While Lohr and Beasley Allen have agreed to hold and maintain the amount in dispute in Trust as agreed by all interested parties, neither Lohr nor
1
As
this
Court
is
aware,
Hard
has
filed
suit
against
numerous
parties
claiming
that
Alabama
law
which
does
not
recognize
same
sex
‐
marriage
and
prohibits
him
from
the
“spousal
share”
pursuant
to
Ala.
Code
§
43
‐
8
‐
41(2)
is
unconstitutional.
Hard
has
further
requested
injunctive
relief
seeking
that
this
Court
recognize
his
same
‐
sex
marriage
as
valid
and
direct
that
he
be
determined
to
be
the
spouse
of
Charles
David
Fancher
so
as
to
be
entitled
to
the
amount
in
dispute.
Case 2:13-cv-00922-WKW-SRW Document 74 Filed 02/23/15 Page 3 of 6
Reward Your Curiosity
Everything you want to read.
Anytime. Anywhere. Any device.
No Commitment. Cancel anytime.
