174 views

Uploaded by Ihsan Samoh เพี่อนดีดี

Fluid mechanic lab report

- Boiler Operation
- REPORT Hydrostatic Fluid
- Fluid Exp. 6 Hydrostatic Pressure
- Hydrostatic Force
- Resistance vs Temperature Experiment Lab Report
- Impact of Jet
- Hydrostatic Pressure (
- 3.Hydrostatic Pressure.
- Mechanical Measurements
- ME405 - Mechanical Measurement & Metrology
- Hydrostatic Pressure
- Hydrostatic Force Final
- Slackers guide to Physics: Electricity and Magnetism
- Trane - Cent Water Chiller
- Hidraulik-hydrostatic Pressure Apparatus
- Chapter 1 Hydrostatic Force
- Mechatronics Final Year Project Proposal
- Lab Report
- Hydrostatic Force and Center of Pressure
- Hydrostatic Pressure Lab

You are on page 1of 14

BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING (HONS)

IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

(BMEGI)

MEE 3220

FLUID MECHANICS 1

EXPERIMENT 1

MEASUREMENTS OF

HYDROSTATICS FORCE

Name

ID

EHSAN SAMOH

DONYEGHA TUNEMI

Albert Law Lee Tai

I14005275

I13003778

I14004759

Date of submission: 12th Feb 2014

1.1

Objectives

i. To determine the hydrostatic thrust acting on a plane surface immersed in water.

ii. To determine the position of the line of action of the thrust and to compare the position

determined by experiment with theory.

1.2

Buoyancy, also known as upthrust, is a very important concept dealing with objects

which are wholly or partially immersed in a fluid, especially in the aspect of marine

engineering. For instance, the draught of a pontoon or ferry can be determined by knowing

the buoyant force acting on it, which equals the weight of the given pontoon or ferry.

Practically, the size of vessels is expressed in terms of displacement or displacement

tonnage, which is the weight of the sea water displaced by the vessel when it is floating.

Under safety consideration, the greatest allowable displacement of the vessel when floating

is called full load displacement, and the line where the water level reaches on the vessels

rail is known as Plimsoll line, usually drawn on the outer shell of the vessel.

For a given fluid with density

below free surface at a distance

where

p at a point

p=gh ,

rectangular plane vertically immersed in the given fluid, we can obtain the force due to fluid

pressure on each element of area A . Since we know from the definition of pressure that,

p=

F

A

F=pA . Substituting

p=gh

and

A=A ,

F=ghA

Summing up all the forces on all elements of area over the immersed rectangular plane, we

have the resultant force,

R= ghA=g hA=g h A

hA =h A

The quantity

Note that the resultant force R should be perpendicular to the immersed surface. We

know from the definition of fluid that, if a fluid is at rest, there can be no shearing forces

acting and, therefore, all forces in the fluid must be perpendicular to the planes upon

which they act. Since the fluid particles are relative at rest, we can assume that there are

only perpendicular forces acting upon the surface.

At the same time it is important to know about the position of the center of pressure

as well since the density of the fluid is not uniform along the vertical direction, therefore the

center of pressure need not to coincide the centroid in vertical direction. The depth of the

center of pressure measured from the free surface is determined by

k O 2 sin2

D=

h

where

kO

is the radius of gyration of the immersed surface about the axis where the

extension area of immersed surface meets the free surface of the fluid, and

is the angle

between the immersed surface and the free surface. For a partially or exact wholly, vertically

immersed rectangular plane, =90 , sin 90 =1 ,

I O I G + A h2 A k G 2+ A h2

2

2

kO = =

=

=k G + h

A

A

A

2

2

h

h

( k G + h 2 )(12) 12 +( 2 ) 2

D=

=

= h

h

h

3

2

2

This equation indicates that the distance of center of pressure measured from the fluids free

surface is two-third of the height of immersed vertical rectangular surface. That is also

where the resultant force due to fluid pressure acting on the plane.

Since we now can simplify the pressure forces on a given surface immersed in a

fluid with known value of density, it would be much easier to analyse the static equilibrium

condition of the mechanism shown in the experiment below.

The apparatus shown above is the hydrostatic pressure apparatus. The main parts of

the apparatus are the pivot, quadrant, weight hanger and the counterbalance. The position of

pivot relative to the quadrant is very important to the accuracy of this experiment. The pivot

is mounted on the balance arm where coincides with the center of arc of the quadrant. Since

we know that a fluid at rest will not be having any shearing forces and all the forces in the

fluid must be perpendicular to the surface in contact, which is the surface of the quadrant, in

this case. The line of action of the forces will definitely pass through the pivot. In order to

create a moment on the balance arm, there must be forces acting on the quadrant and

moment arm which is the perpendicular distance from the line of action of the force to the

pivot. As a result, all the elementary pressure forces acting on the curve surface of the

quadrant will not generate a significant moment upon the apparatus, and therefore the

apparatus will not rotate about pivot P.

If the fluid, say water, is poured into the tank and the quadrant is partially immersed

in the water, when taking the moments about pivot P, only the effects of the pressure force

on the end face of the quadrant and the weights added need to be considered as the pressure

forces on the curve surface will not create any moment or only create a moment that is

sufficiently small to be neglected. The moment arm of both fluid pressure force and weights

can be measured directly before carrying out the experiment.

Since the whole system is in static equilibrium, the algebraic summation of all the

moments acting on the system should be equal to zero, which can be expressed in

mathematical expression

M =0

determined by equating the counter-clockwise moments and the clockwise moments, while

the experimental values of the hydrostatic force can be determined using equation

R= g h A . The height of the immersed part of the quadrant can be determined from the

scale on the side of the quadrant. Note that the counterbalance will also generate a moment

about pivot P, and since its weight and moment arm are constant, its moment should be a

constant value as well.

Figure 1.3 The scale can be used to measure the height of the immersed part of the quadrant.

1.3

Procedures

1. Before carrying out the experiment, one ensured that the fluid tank of the hydrostatic

pressure apparatus is on the horizontal water level by checking the circular spirit level

mounted beside the fluid tank.

2. The dimensions of the quadrant end-face (both length and width), the distance between

the pivot and the weights and the distance between the pivot and the bottom of the

quadrant were measured directly on the apparatus.

3. The position of the counterbalance and the number of weights were adjusted according

to level indicator in order to balance the arm to horizontal position. (The fluid tank was

empty.)

Figure 1.4 The level indicator on the end of the balance arm

4. The drain valve was closed before pouring water into the tank to avoid water from

draining out of the tank.

5. Extra weights were added progressively, in our case the weight was added 20g every

time, initially 120g.

6. A certain amount water was added (water level should at least reach the minimum level

of the height scale on the side of quadrant) to balance the arm back to horizontal

position, and the height of water level was taken down.

7. Step 5 and 6 was repeated until the water level reaches the top of the water level scale.

8. Then the procedures were repeated reversely, the height of remaining water was

recorded for every time 20g of weight was removed.

9. The experimental data were recorded and tabulated in the Results and Calculations part.

1.4

The distance from pivot to the weights, d 1=27.5 cm

The distance from pivot to the bottom of the quadrant, d 2=21.1 cm

Dimensions of end face of quadrant: 7.8 cm 9.8 cm (length d3 x width d4)

First attempt: Adding weight progressively and pouring in water to maintain balance.

Mass of Weight, m (g)

200

220

240

260

280

300

320

340

83

89

94

99

104

109

113

118

1.962

2.158

2.354

2.551

2.747

2.943

3.139

3.335

360

380

400

420

123

128

133

138

3.532

3.728

3.924

4.120

We can find the resultant force due to water pressure by using equation R= g h A . This

equation can transform into a more convenient expression. When the water poured in was

1

immersing the end face of quadrant, h= 2 h and

R= g h A=g

( h2 ) h d = 12 g h d

2

face of the quadrant

A=h d 3 , which is

d3

, gravitational acceleration

2

R is directly proportional to h

, that is

R h

After the end face of quadrant had wholly been immersed (which means that

0.098

h=h

=h0.049 , therefore

2

h>9.8 cm ),

R= g ( h0.049 ) d 3 d 4 .

3

1

( =1000 kg m , g=9.81 N kg )

83

89

94

99

104

109

113

118

123

128

133

138

2.636

3.030

3.381

3.749

4.124

4.499

4.799

5.174

5.549

5.924

6.299

6.674

When the water is immersing the end face of the quadrant, the distance from the free

surface to its center of pressure is

2

h based on the derivation in the Introduction and

3

1

Theory part, and therefore the moment arm of resultant force is d 2 3 h .

After the end face of quadrant is wholly immersed, the distance of center of pressure

from free surface of water can be derived as below:

kO2

D=

h

Since

2

k O 2=

I O I G + A (h0.049)

=

=k G2 +( h0.049)2

A

A

2

0.098

+(h0.049)2

k G 2+(h0.049)2

12

0.0982

D=

=

=

+h0.049

h0.049

h0.049

12h0.588

Water Level, h

(mm)

83

89

94

99

104

109

113

118

123

128

133

138

D (m)

0.055

0.059

0.063

0.066

0.070

0.073

0.077

0.081

0.085

0.089

0.094

0.098

Moment Arm of R

(m)

0.183

0.181

0.180

0.178

0.177

0.175

0.175

0.174

0.173

0.172

0.172

0.171

water pressure force and weight. The magnitude of these two moments should cancel each

other to remain itself in equilibrium. That is,

M W =M R

Moment Arm

of R

(m)

0.183

0.181

0.180

0.178

0.177

0.175

0.175

0.174

0.173

0.172

0.172

0.171

Resultant

Force, R (N)

Weight, W

(N)

Moment of R

(Nm)

Moment of W

(Nm)

2.636

3.030

3.381

3.749

4.124

4.499

4.799

5.174

5.549

5.924

6.299

6.674

1.962

2.158

2.354

2.551

2.747

2.943

3.139

3.335

3.532

3.728

3.924

4.120

0.483

0.550

0.607

0.667

0.728

0.789

0.837

0.898

0.959

1.020

1.080

1.141

0.540

0.594

0.647

0.701

0.755

0.809

0.863

0.917

0.971

1.025

1.079

1.133

water pressure resultant force R. Comparing both column of results, we have a maximum

discrepancy of around 0.056 Nm, and therefore the result of this experiment can be treated

as reliable and accurate.

1.5

Discussions

Based on the water level versus resultant force table presented above, we can plot a

graph to represent their relationship.

7

6.5

6

5.5

5

Resultant Force R / N

4.5

4

3.5

3

2.5

2

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

From the diagram and the relationship equation derived in previous part, the water

pressure resultant force (acting similar to upthrust) and depth of water level can be described

approximately linked by a linear relationship (even before h = 9.8cm the relationship

between R and h is binomial

1

R= g h2 d 3 , however the slope of the binomial curve

2

doesnt change much, and therefore can be treated as approximately linear). Based on the

graph, the slope of the best-fit line is approximately the same based on the data points

collected. From the scatter diagram above, we can conclude that as the depth of water level

increases, the resultant water pressure force increases proportionally to the increase in depth

of water level.

Except of the resultant force R, the depth of the center of pressure is also affected by

the depth of immersion. We know that before h = 9.4cm, the center of pressure is always

two-third of depth of immersion measured from the free surface of water. However, the

relationship

between

these

two

becomes

complicated,

which

is

0.0982

D=

+h0.049 . The relationship is graphically represented in the graph

12 h0.588

shown below.

Relationship between Depth of Center of Pressure (D) and Depth of Immersion (h)

0.1

0.09

0.08

0.06

0.05

0.04

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

Depth of Immersion h / mm

Based on the graph above, the relationship between D and h is to be more likely a

binomial or exponential trend. As the depth of immersion increases, the depth of center of

pressure will increase, and its rate of increase is getting faster as well since the slope of the

curve is becoming greater.

And we also looked into the experiment to check the discrepancies between

theoretical and experimental results obtained. Back to the table where we compare the

moments generated by resultant upthrust force and the weight.

Moment of R

(Nm)

0.483

0.550

0.607

0.667

0.728

0.789

0.837

0.898

0.959

1.020

1.080

1.141

Moment of W

(Nm)

0.540

0.594

0.647

0.701

0.755

0.809

0.863

0.917

0.971

1.025

1.079

1.133

Discrepancy

(Nm)

0.056

0.044

0.040

0.034

0.027

0.020

0.026

0.019

0.012

0.005

0.001

0.008

However, it is important to identify the reasons behind the discrepancies occurred in the

experiment. Firstly, we made an assumption on the density of water to be 1000 kg m-3 but

this might not be exactly true, as 1000 kg m-3 is the greatest density of water at 4 degree

Celsius. During experiment, impurities and the different in temperature may lead to minor

discrepancies to the experimental results.

And secondly we should be cautious on the location of pivot and the smooth curve of

the quadrant. The difference we obtained between the moments of resultant force R and

weights added W may be caused due to this major reason. As mentioned earlier, if the

location of pivot P coincides the center of arc of the curve surface of quadrant, the line of

action of the water pressure force acting on the curve surface will be perpendicular to the

surface and thus passing through the pivot, which results in no moment arm and therefore no

moment is generated. But this can only be achieved by assuming that the pivot is exactly

coincides the center of arc of the curve surface of quadrant, which might not be

experimentally true. In most real cases, these elemental water pressure force will cause a

small amount of moment on the whole system rotating about pivot P. Therefore,

theoretically speaking the curve surface of the quadrant has nothing to do with the

experimental result, only if the curve is smooth and having the pivot as its center of arc.

Thirdly, we considered that the discrepancies might be resulted by the inaccuracy

labelling of weight value on the weights. The difference of the actual weights and the

labelled weights may be small, however if we multiply the weight with the moment arm to

obtain its rotational moment, the small difference can be enhanced and result in a larger

difference in the magnitude of moment.

This experiment can relate us to the design of a water dam. Below is the graphical

sectional view of Mullaperiyar Dam in the Indian state of Kerala.

We know that in the reservoir of water dam, as the head from the water surface

increases, the water pressure will increase according to the formula p=gh where h is

the head of a point in the water contained. Therefore, the deeper it goes, the wall of the dam

should be built thicker in order to withstand the hydrostatic force caused by the water

pressure. We know that the pressure force on a flat surface immersed in fluid will be parallel

to each other, and add up to become greater in magnitude if they are in the same direction. If

the surface is curved, every elemental pressure force are pointing at different direction, and

therefore they will cancel each other partially (or even wholly cancel each other if the

surface is circle in shape). This concept is also applied in building a dam, for example the El

Atazar Dam near Madrid. This kind of design is known as arch dam. An arch dam is

designed so that the pressure force of water will partially cancel each other and also press

against the arch to compress and strengthen the dam structure. It is more suitable in narrow

gorges or canyons, and since it requires less construction materials, it is more economical

and practical in remote areas.

1.6

Conclusion

This experiment gives a moderate accuracy to measure the pressure force on the end

face of quadrant. The key concept of this experiment is to know that since the balance arm is

in equilibrium before pouring in water, the moment created by the water pressure force on

the end face of quadrant should be equal to the moment created by weights. And since the

pressure force on the curve surface will not create any moment on the system about pivot, it

needs not to be considered. As the water level increases, the resultant pressure force and its

center of pressure will vary as well. To improve the accuracy of this experiment, the weight

should be weighed in advance to confirm its actual weight value. Besides, this experiment

can also be done by replacing water with other liquids, such as alcohol with known density

to compare the experimental results obtained.

1.7

References

1. Displacement (ship) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. 2014. Displacement (ship) Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. [ONLINE] Available at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Displacement_(ship).

2. Arch dam - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. 2014. Arch dam - Wikipedia, the free

encyclopedia. [ONLINE] Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arch_dam.

- Boiler OperationUploaded byjmayurr
- REPORT Hydrostatic FluidUploaded byMohd Kaswandee Razali
- Fluid Exp. 6 Hydrostatic PressureUploaded byIr Fik T
- Hydrostatic ForceUploaded byAhmad Muzakkir
- Resistance vs Temperature Experiment Lab ReportUploaded byEmily Gatlin
- Impact of JetUploaded bykenjosroy1
- Hydrostatic Pressure (Uploaded byAhmad Abdullah
- 3.Hydrostatic Pressure.Uploaded bySalam Albaradie
- Mechanical MeasurementsUploaded bycaptainhass
- ME405 - Mechanical Measurement & MetrologyUploaded byhrana287
- Hydrostatic PressureUploaded byHaziq Itik King
- Hydrostatic Force FinalUploaded byChala1989
- Slackers guide to Physics: Electricity and MagnetismUploaded bykhers_zal
- Trane - Cent Water ChillerUploaded bySam Wang Chern Peng
- Hidraulik-hydrostatic Pressure ApparatusUploaded byMohd Amran
- Chapter 1 Hydrostatic ForceUploaded byVimal Mathivanan
- Mechatronics Final Year Project ProposalUploaded byArjun Pratap Singh
- Lab ReportUploaded byKarthick Murugesan
- Hydrostatic Force and Center of PressureUploaded byIsraafil Ahmad
- Hydrostatic Pressure LabUploaded byMuhammadShah
- Movie ReviewUploaded bycnorwood01
- Rapid PrototypingUploaded bySandesh SK
- ReportUploaded byZack Nel
- Center of PressureUploaded byEdrees Jamal
- Hydrostatic Force on a Submerged SurfaceUploaded byum4alltravel
- BERNOULLI’S THEOREMUploaded byNur Falini Mohd Sukkri
- Experiment BernoulliUploaded byHafiniHambali
- Experiment # 04Uploaded byshahryarahmad
- Movie ReviewUploaded byGio Mar Porto
- Movie ReviewUploaded byVangeline Mandiit

- 2.Pressure and HeadUploaded byIhsan Samoh เพี่อนดีดี
- MEE3223 - Assignment 2Uploaded byIhsan Samoh เพี่อนดีดี
- EEE4204 Im 003a Nts (Students) - Sensing ElementsUploaded byIhsan Samoh เพี่อนดีดี
- Chapter 1 SwkUploaded byIhsan Samoh เพี่อนดีดี
- 1.Fluid and Their PropertiesUploaded byIhsan Samoh เพี่อนดีดี
- Quran CircleUploaded byIhsan Samoh เพี่อนดีดี
- Experiment 1Uploaded byIhsan Samoh เพี่อนดีดี
- Experiment 4Uploaded byIhsan Samoh เพี่อนดีดี
- ASSIGNMENT 3_EGR2208_Question.pdfUploaded byIhsan Samoh เพี่อนดีดี

- Structural Dynamics.docUploaded byBOKO-HAYA D. Didier
- 19238173 Air Conditioning RefrigerationUploaded byteuferu
- Recommendations for the Seismic Design of High Rise BuildingsUploaded bypjuvvadi
- THERMO-MECHANICAL TREATMENT REBARUploaded byMunna Bhai
- Complete Dissertation BirdsUploaded bykocrucq
- NotesUploaded byJohn Smith
- Density and Archimedes PrincipalUploaded byFerdinand Yeo
- HEAT TRANFER LECTURE NOTESUploaded byNarayana Swamy G
- Types Tuned Mass DampersUploaded byJeff Hardy
- Shell Tube Heat Exchanger DesignUploaded byMakhdoom Ibad Hashmi
- 02whole.pdfUploaded byluis
- Isotensoid FormulationUploaded bynhung_33
- Phases of Matter Sim.docxUploaded byJohn Van Dave Taturo
- Theory of Plates and ShellsUploaded bySahil Gandhi
- Charles's LawUploaded byEn Csak
- Experimental Investigation of a Dimpled Plate by Natural Convection Heat TransferUploaded byIRJET Journal
- AucosticsUploaded bywendodavid
- PE 10 Elastic SettlementUploaded bygertjani
- AS/NZS 4600 2005 Cold-Formed Steel StructuresUploaded byFred Flindstone
- Is Hydrology KinematicUploaded bySudharsananPRS
- Analysis of Strength and Fatigue PropertyUploaded byahmadkamal
- Control System Analysis & Design by Frequency ResponseUploaded byDozdi
- Chapter 2-Thermo HandoutUploaded byGina Alejo
- physics report draft.docxUploaded byViola Voon Li Wei
- 8 States of MatterUploaded byrashmi_harry
- 03_FormabilityUploaded bycallista fatima
- 2_Work Energy Power to Properties of Liquids.pdfUploaded bysatheeshbabun
- ElectrostaticsUploaded byIsrael Lives
- The General Theory of RelativityUploaded byBharath Chandra
- lecture1Uploaded bychethan r