You are on page 1of 72

# 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Lecture No. 4
Dr. Warakorn Mairaing
Associate Professor
Civil Engineering Department
Kasetsart University, Bangkok
Tel: 02-57902-579-2265
02
579-2265
Email: mairaing@yahoo.com

DRAINED AND
AND UNDRAINED
UNDRAINED STRENGTH
STRENGTH
DRAINED

## Soil Strength depend highly on pore pressure during loading

Two extreme conditions are normally considered for design and
analysis.

## 1. Drained Strength ; when excess pore pressure (u) 0

during loading or after fully dissipation of u 2 typical eases are;
1) Sand or gravel layers of high k u dissipate fast
2) Clayey soil with slow rate of loading small increase of u and
longer time of dissipation

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

## 2. Undrained Strength ; when u remained during loading

u fully developed and remained

## Fully undrained condition

u partially is dissipated

Partialy drained

Ex.
1) Saturated clay with high rate of loading
2) Silt and fine sand with seismic or repeated load Accumulation
of pore pressure Boiling
Mohr Coulombs Effective Strength Equation

= c + ( u s u ) tan
us = Constant

## Drained or Effective strength concept

usually applied for u = 0 or known u
Undrainred or Total strength concept
for u is fully deveoped or unknow u (high)
Stress-path method is normally used to explain drained and
Undrained soil strength.

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Actual Behaviors
Behaviors
Actual
1. Confined Compression / Consolidation

ne
li
Ko

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

ne
li

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

2. Triaxial Compression
Ex. At the edge of embankment

Ko

vo

HO

ne
li

P
ES

li

ne

P
TS

## At Pt. A. For Normally Consolidated Clay at Ko-Condition

BC = Dissipation of Excess pore pressure

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

STRENGTH TEST
TEST BY
BY TRIAXIAL
TRIAXIAL
STRENGTH
COMPRESSION
COMPRESSION

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

STRENGTH
STRENGTH TEST
TEST BY
BY TRIAXIAL
TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION
COMPRESSION
1. Closely simulate the aetual field stress condition.
2. Fully control the drainage condition in the sample.
3. Get more design informations. (Design Parameters)
-c,
- u
- v
- E , Ko
4. Automatic control and monitoring capability.

1. Require qualified technician
2. Costly
SOIL SAMPLE

UU-Test
UU-Test
1. Natural Soil (Saturated)
UCS 3 = 0 Cu
= 0 Concept T3 > 0
Cu
2. Compacted Soil
(Unsaturated)
T3 > 0 Cu, u, u

CU-Test
CU-Test
1. Natural Soil (Saturated)
c , , u
2. Compacted Soil with
pore pressure
(u)

CD-Test
CD-Test
1. Gronular Soil

c , , = 0
E , v

c ,

## Very difficult to obtain

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

## Types of Triaxial Test

1. True Triaxial Test

When

1 > 2 > 3

## - Usually occur in plane-strain

condition in the field

## need special equipment

2. Conventional Triaxial Test

c = 3
c = 3
3

## 3. Repeated or Cyclic loading Triaxial Test

Simulate - earthquake
- repeated load (pavement)
- machine foundation
- Oil drilling platform

## 4. Low strain Triaxial Test

L
1 2%
Lo
Special Strain Gage

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

For

- Tunneling work
- Retaining wall

Field

Lab

Installation /
Saturation

c
v

v0

c
a
c

v0

H 0 = K 0 v 0

Consolidation

Bring back to in
situ condition

H 0 + H

1
Shearing

Application

## Simulation of triaxial Test

UU-Test
Unconsolidated
Undrained Test

Consolidated Tests
Consolidation
Phase

CU-Test

CD-Test

Held Constant

Held Constant

Held Constant

Held Constant

From 3

Equal to 3 *

increased from 3

Drainage Lines
Closed

Drainage
Lines Open **

## No water permitted to escape.

Pore pressure measured for
effective stress tests.

Drainage lines
open.

## * Unless anisotropic consolidation is to be effected

** In back pressured tests, pressure is supplied to pore lines, but drainage is permitted

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

## HUAI PA THAO DAM

STRENGTH CHARACTERISTIC, (C-O DIAGRAM)
35

, (degree)

30

25
20

15

10
5

Design

10

12

14

16

C, (t/m ^2)
UU TEST

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

## HUAI PA THAO DAM

STRENGTH CHARACTERISTIC, (C-O DIAGRAM)
35

, (degree)

30

25
20

Design

15

10
5

10

12

14

16

C, (t/m ^2)
CU TEST

DRAINED STRENGTH
STRENGTH
DRAINED

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

10

Drained Strength

## Excess pore pressure (u) 0

u
2
1. k u
2.
u
Undrained Strength Excess pore pressure (u) 0

1.
u
2. (Silt)
u repeated load Boiling

## Mohr-Coulombs Effective Strength Equation

= c + ( u s u ) tan
Constant

Varied

## drained undrained strength u

(strength)

Stress path

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

11

3 = const.,
1 = increase
1 = const.
3 = increase ,

3 = decrease ,
1 = const.

3 = const. ,
1 = decrease
Case 1

Case 2

qs

v
vo
Ho

Case 3

## Stress paths for triaxial tests.

CD-TEST
CD-TEST

Sh
e
TS a r i
P, ng
ES
P

K f line

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

12

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

CU-TEST
CU-TEST

TS
P

ESP

UU Test
Test
UU

q
u
Da

TS
P

ES P

ur +Bc

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

13

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Triaxial Tests.
Tests.
Triaxial

Initial
Consolidation?

No

Yes

Cell
Pressure?

Isotropic
Consokidation?

No

Yes

Unconfined
Compression

UU

No
CA

Yes
CI

Drained
Shearing?

Drained
Shearing?

1
No
CAU

Yes

Shearing in

No
CIU

Shearing in

Yes
CID

Shearing in

Shearing in

Extension

Compression

Extension

Compression

Extension

Compression

Extension

Compression

CAUE

CAUC

CIUE

CIUC

CIDE

CIDC

1UU
UUUnconsolidated
UnconsolidatedUndrained
Undrained
1
2CU
CUConsolidated
ConsolidatedUndrained
Undrainedwith
withpore
porepressure
pressuremeasurement
measurement
2
3CD
CDConsolidated
ConsolidatedDrained.
Drained.
3

DRAINED SHEAR
SHEAR STRENGTH
STRENGTH
DRAINED

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

14

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

DRAINED SHEAR
SHEAR STRENGTH
STRENGTH
DRAINED

I.

FIELD CONDITION
- Granular materials , dry or partially saturated.
- Cohesive materials , slow rate of loading

## II. LABORATORY CONDITION

- Slow rate of loading, drainage permitted, excess pore pressure (u) = 0

## CD-Test or Slow Test

Case Study Triaxial Test on Remolded Weald Clay by Henkel (1956)
LL. = 43%
PL. = 18%
PI. = 25%

## Percent clay (<0.002)

Activity
Specific gravity (G)

= 40%
= 0.6
= 2.74

## Case I. Normally Consolidated Clay (NC) , 3 Samples

Sample No.
Confining pressure (psi)

1
10

2
30

## Case II. Over Consolidated Clay (OC) ,

7 Samples

- Consolidated To
- Then rebound to test at
Sample No.
Confining p. (psi)
OCR.

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

1
5
24

2
8
15

3
100

=
3
15
8

120 psi
4
25
4.8

5
45
2.7

6
60
2.0

7
70
1.7

15

Kf

## Normalized test results.

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

16

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

CD-Test
CD-Test

P
ES P
TS

At failure
1

After consolidation
3

3
3

At failure

## Test results on normally consolidated Weald clay.

CD-TEST

Kf -

line

NC

TS
P
ES
P

OC

450c
P

f1
At failure
After consolidation

0 q0

At failure

## Test results on normally consolidated Weald clay.

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

17

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Kf

O.C.

1 2
p=

( 1 + 3 ) (lb / in.2 )

O.C.

OCR>2

5
p=

6 7

( 1 + 3 ) (lb / in.2 )

## Results of CD tests on overconsolidated Weald clay.

pm = 120 lb / in.2

K f (OC.)

K f ( NC.)
Max
Failure envelope of a clay with preconsolidation pressure = c

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

18

p0 w0 (OC.)

q0 w0

P m = 120 psi

q f w f (OC.)

p0 w0 (OC.)

p f w f (OC.)

## Stress-volume relations for overconsolidated Weald

P m = 120 psi

pm = 120 lb / in.2

## Summary of CD-Test Resuts of Weald Clay

Unique Characteristic of

q f p f w f Relationship
Relationship

## For Normally Consolidated Clay (NC)

For each soil , when CD-Test was test then the following results can be summarized

## 1. The water content after consolidation is linearly proportioned to log p0.

Consolidation pressure.
Curve : Wo log (po) is straight line
2. After drained shearing of soil samples, the final water contents (Wf) at failure are
linearly proportioned to gf and p f (in log. Scale)

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

Wf log(gf)

Wf log(pf)

19

## 3. After preconsolidation pressures, the samples were rebound to a curtain confining

pressure. The wo - will show the lower value than wo of N.C. due to OC. Clay has inelastic
property of soil.

w o log(p o ),

w f log(q f ),

C.

C.

(O

(O

wf

Pm

qf

P0

w f log(pf )

P m = 120 psi
p f wf

p0 w0 (OC.)

P m = 120 psi

## Stress-volume relations for overconsolidated Weald

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

pm = 120 lb / in.2

20

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Hvorslevs parameters.

e
MOHR s (NC.)

ce

MOHRs (OC.)

NC

pf =

## Hvorslevs Strength Parameter (1937)

- Combine effect of NC. And OC. to

w f and f

1f

+3f )
2

(lb / in. )
2

f = f (w f ) + f ( f )
f = ce + f tan

W fi

17 o
LOW
E
DESIG R BOUND
N

## Soft Bangkok Clay

Relationship between sin and plasticity index for normally consolidated soils (From Kenney, 1959).

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

21

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

22

Ultimate

10%

## Relationship between peak and ultimate conditions.

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

23

## Apparent Cohesion due to capillary

(a) Sand

(b) Clay
Capillary rise

-u

Kf -

line

aapp

Effect of capillary tensions on effective stress and strength. (a) Sand. (b) Clay.

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

24

## Effect of variable ground water conditions.

UNDRAINED SHEAR
SHEAR STRENGTH
STRENGTH
UNDRAINED

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

25

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Undrained Shear
Shear Strength
Strength
Undrained

Sort strength is highly depended on the drainage condition in soil mass. During
undrained condition when excess pore pressure is fully developed and no time to dissipate,
the strength is called undrained strength
Normally, the undrained strength is lower than drained strength due to the present
of pore pressure. The behavior of undrained strength can also explain by the theory of
effective stress and represented by Stress path
1. Theoritical or laboratory
Fully undrained conditions can be simulated.
2. Practical or field
Partially drained condition is usually occurred.

## We should consider the worst case for the design.

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

## drained strength higher then undrained strength is used.

drained strength is lowest.

26

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

N.C.
N.C.

O.C.
O.C.

a
c = 120 psi

30 psi

Rebound
c = 10 psi

a
c
c

a
OCR =

120
10

c = 10 psi

TS
P

ESP
450

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

27

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

ES
P

TS

A=

u
2q

Af =

u f
2q f

Example 28.2
OCR =

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

120
= 12
10

28

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Bangkok Clay

Weald Clay

qf

pf

17

45

q
u f = ?
(45,17)

60

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

Af =0.94

TS
P

ESP

29

CD

CU

CD Test

Kf

ESP

qf = 17.5 psi

CD

u
CU

from
find

P
TS

wf qf
wf = 20.6%
wo = 23%
CU Test

Wo = 23%

CU

qf = 8.5 psi
wf = 23%

CD

30

Po

Kf

## AB = ESP for Undrained T.A.

q,q
E
=
ES
(L P
)

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

Failure Level

TS
P
(L
)

P
ES

U
C
P
ES
=
)
P
(U
TS D
C

TSP
CU(U)

CD

TS
P

(CU )

P, P

30

Po wo

NC

OC

q f wf

(OC )

Pm = 120 psi

## Stress-volume relations for over-consolidated Weald clay

pm = 120 lb / in.2

Example 28.5

## pm = 120 psi and po = 30 psi

Find. qf and wf for both drained and undrained shear with 1 , increasing while 3 remains constant.
Solution. Follow same steps as in Example 28.3. The diagrams are given in Fig. E28.5 and the answers
appear in the table in Example 28.6

3
2
OC

TS
P

C
D

C
U

Kf (

10

15

3
2
1

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

31

## If Po = 10 psi Construct ESP, TSP, Find u, Af

NC
OC

wo, = wf = 21.1%
OCR = 12

Pm = 120 psi
NC

q f = 12 psi q 16 psi
f

OC

P0

p f = 28 psi

## Stress-volume relations for overconsolidated Weald clay

p f = 4 psi

pm = 120 lb / in.2

Relative
Relative Magnitude
Magnitude of
of Drained
Drained and
and Undrained
Undrained Strength
Strength
Normally
Consolidated
Clay

Heavily
Overconsoldated
Clay

(1 increasing with 3 constant)

CD > CU

CU CD

(1 constant with 3 decreasing)

CU CD

CU >> CD

TS

TS
P

(L
)

Note. These comparisons apply for specimens with the same initial effective stress.

P
)
(U

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

32

P
TS

TS
P

Shear
Shear Strength
Strength
CU
CU
CD
CD

Relative
Relative of
of Drained
Drained and
and Undrained
Undrained Stress
Stress Strain
Strain Curve.
Curve.
Kf

## Drained Undrained Modulus

if

= 0.3
E 1.15 E

P
IN
E S RA
ND
(U

E 1 3 E

ED

Actual

3
E
2(1 + )

TS
P

E=

Partially drained.
(Actual field Condition)
P

Kf

K0

NO v 0
1 K0
1 + K0

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

33

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Drained
Drained
Undrained
Undrained Modulus
Modulus

If

## E = Undrained Youngs Modulus

E = Drained Youngs Modulus

While is

E = f (E )

Ex =

Ev =

x = v, y = z = 0

1
v
E

## For Effective Stress - vertical loading

Ev =

1
x u ( y + z )
E

( 1 )

x = v , y = z = h =

1
( v 2 n )
E

( 2 )

## When u = Poissons ratio of mineral skeleton.

For Isotropic mineral skeleton and axial loading from
Eq. 26.5

A=

Then

1
1 + 2(C s / Cc )

C s =Cc

A=

1
3

1
3

v = v A v = v v =
h = 0 A v =

2
v
3

v
3

( 3 )
( 4 )

Gv =

1 2
2
2 v

(1 + )
v + v =
E3
3
3 E

( 5 )

## Or (1) = (5) Then

E=

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

3
E
2(1 + )

( 6 )

34

## Final Strains are depended on stress-path

Stress path before failure

Elastic strain

Plastic strain

Consolidation

CU

CD

## 1. Larger p during loading cause smaller final strain (Ea)

2. Stress-path (ESP) closer to Kf - line cause larger final strain due to plastic + yielding behaviors.

TS
P

1
TS
P

Su

c1
c2

## Unconsolidated undrained tests on partially

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

35

= c + tan (K f )

Partially Sat.
UU-Test
3

4
Saturated.

Fully Sat.
1

4
3
3

Fully Sat.

Slope = S1

Partially Sat.
A

Slope = S1

S2
Slope = 0
-S2
Air void
Water void

## Effect of Partially saturated soil

- Strength
- Deformation
- Consolidation
- % Saturation
Undrained - Drained
Application
1. Compacted embankment
2. Earth dam
3. Landfill

Initial Void.

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

36

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Undrained Shear
Shear Strength
Strength
Undrained
1. Undrained Shear Strength of Saturated Sand

Generally
1. Loose sand similar to N.C. or Soft Clay
2. Dense sand similar to O.C. or Stiff Clay

Exception
For loose sand after peak, soil can maintain it failure condition and pore pressure
start to decrease due to dilatency effect.

## 2. Cavitation of Pore Water

For dense sand during searing, soil mass tend to expound and develop negative
pore pressure.
If u < -1.0 ATM. (-14.4 psi), then pore water will cavilate

Solution
Back pressure of about 1 ATM (or more) is applied in soil sample and confining
pressure.

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

37

=0

## Dense Sand -->Cavitation @ Low Confining Pressure

Unsaturated due to
cavitation

P
ES

P
ES

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

38

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

ub

= c b

= ( c + c ) ( b + b )

Beak
pressure 2
ATM.

## 3. Sensitive Clay and Very Loose Sands.

The Collapsing soil structure results the rearrangement of soil particles after peak
strength. Then, the excess pore pressure continue to increase and cause the ultimate K-line
larger than peak K-line

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

39

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Kf

ate
im
ult

uf

Kf -

@p

eak

TSD

More Meta
Meta Structure
Structure
More
Unstable Structure

Stable Structure

Ultimate

Peak

Peak

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

40

## 4. Strength after repeated load or seismic load

Fatigue strength

<

static strength

Due to
1. Accumulation of pore pressure
2. Rearrangement of soil particles.
3. Reduction of cementing bonds.

Generally we want to find the Fatigue Limit which is (the number of load
application (cycle) until) the failure strength below peak single strength occurred.

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

1 cycle

41

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

42

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Static Strength

Limite

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

43

## 5. Anisotropic Consolidation before Shearing.

Generally
1. Typical isotropic T.A. Test
2. Ansisotropic T.A. Test
Both tests will show the different stress paths, but the same failure line (same kf-line)

v0
H0

s=

v0 H 0

CAK

H0
H0

1 k0
1 + k0

30

CIU

s =c
10

LAB

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

44

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Ultimate strength

k f ( peak )

peak

ESP

Pps

## Undisturbed strength soil in natural forming structure

remolded strength Soil is completely disturbed (or destroy the original structure.)
disturbed strength partially disturbed to some certain degree.

Sensitivity =

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

Undisturbed strength
Remolded strength

45

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

a
Undisturbed

Kf

Kc

Remdded
con

C
so

AU

H'
s
wr

ps

Isotropic Cur

gs

Field

Transported

ur = ps

VO
C

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

CIV

HO

Saturated

Consolidated

C
Shearing

46

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

7. Stress History
- Overconsolidated

OC

- Normally Consolidated

NC

qf
qfm

NC
1
OC

Po / Pm

## Normalized undrained strength by SHANSEP

SHANSEP Theory
Theory by
and Foott
Foott (1974)
(1974)
SHANSEP
Stress History And Normalized Soil Engineering Properties

## When clayey soil is naturally sedimented or artificially sedimented in laboratory.

The undrained shear strength (Su) is proportioned to Po as

Su
m
= S o (OCR )
Po
When

So =

Su
Po

( 1 )

So 0.25

## m = Constant 0.8 0.05

OCR = Overconsolidation Ratio

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

47

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Laboratory Procedures

## 1. Obtain soil sample (Undisturbed or slightly disturbed)

2. Consolidate in triaxial to Po > Pm
3. Release consolidation pressure to test at different OCR.
4. Obtain Su (or qf) at various Po

## and OCR, Then solve for m and So

Application
1. Use for stability analysis for large {embankment excavation}
2. Use for field test quality control.

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

48

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

49

## Table : Common Methods for Measuring undrained Strength

Method

Comment

In-situ measurements
1. Vane test

## Usually considered to give best result, but is

limited as to strength of soil with which it
can be used

## 3. Static Conre Pure Test (CPT)

Measurements upon undisturbed samples
1. Unconfined compression

## Best general purpose test; underestimates

strength because disturbance decreases
effective stress

## Most representative of laboratory tests,

because of compensating errors.

## Overestimates strength, because

disturbance leads to smaller water content
upon reconsolidation

STRESS STRAIN
STRAIN RELATIONSHOP
RELATIONSHOP FOR
FOR CU
CU
STRESS
Applications
1. Immediate Settlement of Loaded Area
2. Movement of Tunnel in soil
3. Excavation heaving and lateral movement
Parameters
- Youngs Modulus, E (Elastic modulus)
- Shear modulus, G
- Poissons Raton, or
From Eq. 12.4

G=

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

E
2(1 + )

( 1 )

50

G=

E
3

( 2 )

## Shear modulus G can be measured quite accurate by shear wave propagation

velocity. Ex. Shear column, seismic survey etc.
Hardin and Black (1968) estimated G for sand and clay.

G = 1230

(2.973 e )2
c
1+ e

( 3 )

G and c in psi

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

51

## Table : Poissons Ratio

Type of Soil

V (G)

Clay, Saturated
Clay, Unsaturatd
Sandy Clay
Silt
Sand, Gravelly Sand
Rock
Loess
Ice
Concrete

0.4 0.5
0.1 0.3
0.2 0.3
0.3 0.35
0.3 0.4
0.1 0.4
0.1 0.3
0.36
0.15

v
x
= 0.5
x0
H
v
y
= 0.5
y0
H

Youngs Modulus
Modulus flow
flow stress
stress strain
strain Carve
Carve
Youngs

Dense sand
or OC. Clay

Et
Es

Peak

Ei

%E

## Ei = Initial Tangential Modulus

Es = Secant Modulus
Et = Tangential Modulus

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

52

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Test for
for small
small strain
strain modulus
modulus
Test
1. Repeated load test

a
E
Initial Stress Level
%c

h
L

Strain gate

## Resistant Strain gage

L
L

E=

Duncans Stress
Stress Strain
Strain Model
Model (FEM)
(FEM)
Duncans
Due to non-linearity of soil stress-strain curve, Duncan and Kulhawy (1969)
proposed hyperbolic model for stress-strain

Asymptote
a

a(utl ) =

1
b

Nonlinear Stress-Strain
E = vasied

%Ea

Et = f (Ei , R f , K , n...)

## Trainsformed to Duncan's Model

a
a
b
1

Trainsformed curve

( 4 )
Rf = Failure ratio
K = Axial modulus member
N = Modulus exponent

1
Ea

%Ea

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

53

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Strain Contours
Contours in
in Stress
Stress -- path
path
Strain

During series of CU - triaxial Test, if strain levels C% axial strain; are plotted along
in stress paths. The readial lines of the same strain can be drawn as strain contours.

Applications
1. Prediction of undrained settlement. (Elastic sett)
2. Estimation of consolidation settlement after dissipation
Using

Ev

v.s.

Consolidation pressure

wo

v.s.

Po

## 3. Estimation of Failure vertical strain during loading

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

54

## Methods for prediction of settlement from Triaxial Test.

1. Direct method.
- Predict stress path due to insitu and construction loadings.
- Obtain the underturbed representative soil samples.
- Run triaxial test follow the predicted stress path.
- Direct measure the vertical strain in the sample

Ev = Ev (undrained) + Ev (Consolidation)

S = Ev
When

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

H
L

(5 )

## H = soil layer thickness

L = sample hight.

55

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

2. Indirect Method

(CU )

tests

## Ex. @ c = 50, 100, 150 kN/m3 as in Fig

- Establish the strain contours
- Establish the relationship between Po v.s. eo (or wo )
- Ev (undrained) is obtained from strain contour.
- Ev (consolidation)

## Evol calculate from

1
E(vol )
3

Po v.s. eo (or wo )

Ev = Ev (undrained) + Ev (consolidation)

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

56

a max

## Normalized Deviator Stress

( 1 3 )
c

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

57

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Factors stress
stress strain
strain behaviors
behaviors (E)
(E)
Factors
1. Consolidation pressure

Po , Po

## N.C. Clay E is proportional to Po or c Then the plot of normalized stress

strain curves is unique for each clay. Figure 30.4
O.C. Clay E is depended on OCR and stress level (F.S.) Figure 30.6

## (on table 30.3)

3. Time and Aging Effects
- Thixtropic Effects Soil stronger with time for remolded and high liquidity index.
- Consolidation Time longer time secondary consolidation stronger soil.
- Strain Rate Effect Dynamic stronger than Static E (dynamic) 1.5 to 2.0 E
(Static)

## Note : without considering of excess pore pressure.

3
2

2
2

Excavation
Perfect sample

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

58

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Stress strain (E) behaviors of soil are highly depended on loading Patten (or
stress paths)

Ex.
Test 1.

(Spread footing, embankment )

Test 2.

(Excavation pit, deep foundation )

Test 3.

(Soil sampling and compression Test)

vo
HO

a
c
Sampling

Lab Test
CAU

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

59

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Peak @ 0.3%
Peak @ 0.7%
1

Ko - Condition

3
Peak @ 14% E

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

60

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Application of
soil Mechanics
Mechanics
Application

1.

Soil Investigation

2.

Pile Foundation

3.

Excavation

4.

Land Reclamation

5.

Slope Stability

6.

## Embankment and Dam

7.

Tunneling

8.

Geotechnical Monitoring

9.

10.

11.

## Soil Engineering Database

Soil Investigation
Investigation (Site
(Site Characterization)
Characterization)
Soil

()

Geology

Surveying
Soil Investigation

Soil mechanics.

Structural Eng.
Environment Eng.
Highway Eng.
Water Resources Eng.
etc.

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

Computer
Database
GIS

61

Soil Mechanics
Mechanics

## 1. Soil Formation, Weathering Processes, Sedimentation, Deposition

2. Soil Physical Properties and Classification
3. Soil and Clay Mineralogy
4. Site Investigation Soil Boring, Sampling. Etc.
5. Laboratory Test Physical, Strength, Compressibility
6. Database, zoning, GIS Statistic, Computer Graphic, Soil profile Model.

Pile
Pile Foundation
Foundation (Deep
(Deep foundation)
foundation)
Problems concerned
1. Pile Capacity
- Strength
- Stress - Strain
2. Consolidation Settlement
- Stress - Strain (Elastic)
- Consolidation
- Stress - distribution
3. Method of Installation
- Driver pore pressure, soil displacement
- Bored
- Pre bored
4. Pile group / Mat foundation
- Group efficiency Stress overlapping
- Relative stiffness
- Differential Settlement

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

62

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

5. Caisson / Shaft
- End bearing
- Seepage
- Horizontal pressure , Friction
6. Bored pile / Barrette Wall (Slurry)
- Bentonite properties
- Trench Stability
- Seepage.
7. Tunneling
Problem
1. Strength
2. Insitu Stress, Stress Release
3. Seepage
4. Rock bolting Soil nailing, living
5. Blasting, Tunneling machine

a
vo

vo

%c

8. Geotechnical monitoring
Problem
1. Pore pressure
3. Movements
4. Temperature
5. Permeability
9. Excavation
Problem

Problem

## 1. Soil Strength - Stability

2. Seepage
3. Lateral earth pressure lateral movement.
4. Pressure relief - heaving
1. Settlement
2. Soil Strength - Stability
3. Compaction - Soil improvement

## 11. Slope Stability (Natural Manmade)

Problem
1. Soil Strength
2. Pore pressure drainage - infiltration
3. Erosion
12. Embankment and Dams
Problem
1. Soil strength
2. Compaction
3. Seepage - drainage
4. Settlement

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

63

Problem

1.

Problem

1.

## 15. Soil Engineering Database

Problem

1.

Design Pile
Pile Foundation
Foundation
Design
Pile Types
1. Short pile (3-12 m)
Timber, R/C
2. Long P/C pile
Section
Length

15

62.5 cm.

26 m. Maximum

3. Bored Pile
- Dry Process

d = 35

200 cm.

- Wet Process
- Micro pile (grouting technique)
4. Steel Pile

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

64

## 1. Static method from soil strength

n

Q f = P ( i Ci Li )
i =1

Q p = Ap v N q
Where
P

ci

cohesion

Li

Ap =

v =

## effective overburden pressure

2. Dynamic method
- for construction monitoring and cross checking only

## 3. Static method from Dutch Cone

Pu = ( i q fi Li P ) + Ap qc
n

i =1

Where
n

## no. of soil layer

qfi =

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

Li

qc

65

Pa = q f P L
When
qf

800 kg/m2

(0-7) m.

L1

## Pile Group Reduction

- Feld Rule
- Friction Area Ratio

- Broms Theory

Pile Foundation

## Evaluction of Pile Types

1. Short pile
2. Precast P/C Pile
3. Bored pile

Site Informationrop
1. Space 4.Soil Profile
2. Noise 5.Soil Prop
3. Vibration

## Supper Structure Data

1. Function Requirement

## Performance Analysis of Piler

1. Pile Capacity
2. Settlement
3. Lateral Stability
Select other pile type
Feasibility Analysis
1. Construction Problems
2. Cost

## (1) Detailed Design

(2) Drawings
(3) Specification

Monitor During
Construction and Operation

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

66

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Retaining Wall

Structural Information
1. Function of R.M
2. Back filll Soil

Foundation Information
1. Soil Profile
2. Soil Properties
3. Tidal and Ground Water Level

Selection of R.W.Type
1. Gravity
2. Cantilever R/C
3. Battress
R/C
4. Cantilever S/P
5. Anchored S/P
6. Relieving Platform Platform
7. Cellular Structures

## Calcualtion of Relating Force and

Pressure
1. Lateral Earth Pressure
2. Water Pressure
3. External Forces

## Select Other Type

Check
1. Base Sliding
2. Overturning
3. Bearing Stress
4. Bearing moment
5. Shearing Stress
6. Anchor Force

Structural Desige

ConsolidationAnalysis

Site Information
1. Soil Profile
2. Soil Properties
3. Ground Water Levle

## Supper Structure Data

1. Footing Arrangement
3. Function

Components of Settiemention
1. Primary Consolidation
2. Elastic Deformation
3. Secondary Consolidation

Determine

P0
P

Elastic by
Poulos

Terzaghi
Poulos

No Application
or FEM Analysis

e0

S=

Cc
P + P
H log 0
1+ e0
P0

Pj

## Cc from Lab Test

ti =

Cv H 2
Ti

Settlement Monitoring

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

67

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Foundation Information
1. Soil Profile
2. Soil Properties
3. Ground Water Level

Embankment Information
1. Cross-Section
2. Material Properties
3. Condition of Analysis

1. Circular
2. Wedge
3. Compination
4. Irregular

## Methods for Analysis

1. Simple Method of Slices
2. Bishop's Method
3. Friction Circle(graphic)
4. FEM
Modified Section
or Corrective Method
Pore Presure Data

F.S.>Flow F.S.

Design
Criteria

Monitoring

## Project : FIFTH BWS. IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Subject : DESIGN FLOW CHART

COMPARISION
-Time
-Construction Sequence
-Construction Method
-Cost

TRIAL SECTION
AND OUTLED PRELODEING BUND

DETAIL DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION

MONITORING
AS
PREDICTED

## DIFFER FROM PREDICTION

CONTINUE
UNTIL COMPLETION

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

68

## Project : FIFTH BWS. IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Subject : FLOW CHART OF THE DESIGN OF SLUDGE LAGOON

INVESTIGATION
- Soil Investigation
- Topographic Survey
- Other Information Collrction

SOIL MODELS
SOIL PROPERTY EVALUATION

PROBLEMS INDENTIFICATION
- Settlement Ratr
- Total Settlement
- Stability Bearing

DESIGN CRITERIA
- Load Strength Density
- Rate of Construction
- Construction Sequence
- Allowable Settlement
- Waiting Period

## ANALYSIS W/O IMPROVEMENT

(PREDICTION)

ANALYSIS W IMPROVEMENT
(PREDICTION)

Geotechnical
Geotechnical Engineering
Engineering involvement
involvement
Related Geotechnical Engineering Topics
Surface
Erosion

Surface Soil
Improvement

Grouting and
Deep
Improvement

Excavation

Compaction

Seepage and
Drainage

Lateral
Movement

Lateral
Pressures

Stability

Settlement

Bearing
Capacities

Engineering Structures

## 1. EARTH AND ROCK FILLED DAMS

1.1 Dam Embankment
1.2 Dam Foundation
1.3 Dam Abutments
1.4 Appurtenant Structures
2. CANALS AND PIPELINES
2.1 Conveyance Structures
2.2 intake Structure
2.3 Storage or Surge Tanks
2.4 Receiving Structure
3. DEEP EXCAVATON
3.1 Free Slope
3.2 Cantilever Sheet piling
3.3 Braced Excavation
3.4 Anchored Retaining Wall

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

69

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Geotechnical
Geotechnical Engineering
Engineering involvement
involvement (
())
Related Geotechnical Engineering Topics
Surface Soil
Improvement

Surface
Erosion

Surface Soil
Improvement

Surface
Erosion

Grouting and
Deep
Improvement

Excavation

Compaction

Seepage and
Drainage

Lateral
Movement

Lateral
Pressures

Stability

Settlement

Bearing
Capacities

Engineering Structures

## 4. Building and Bridge Foundations

4.1 Shallow footing
4.2 Pile Foundation
4.3 Caison or Deep massive footing
4.4 Micro pile or Root pile
5. Embankments, highway and runway
5.1 Highway, Railway
5.2 Runway, Taxiway and Apron
5.3 Land Reclamation (Coastal)
6. Tunneling
6.1 Rock Tunneling
6.2 Underground Opening
6.3 Soil Tunneling
6.4 Cut and Cover

Geotechnical
Geotechnical Engineering
Engineering involvement
involvement (
())
Related Geotechnical Engineering Topics
Grouting and
Deep
Improvement

Excavation

Compaction

Seepage and
Drainage

Lateral
Movement

Lateral
Pressures

Stability

Settlement

Bearing
Capacities

Engineering Structures

## 7. Soil and Rock Slopes

7.1 Natural Slope
7.2 Cut Slope
7.3 Fill Slope
8. Offshore or Near shore Structures
8.1 Oil Drilling Platform
8.2 Jetty and quay wall
8.3 Dry Dock

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

70

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

71

## 203552 Advanced Soil Mechanics

Consolidation

Pile
Capacity

Bearing
Capacity

Stability

Lateral
Earth
Pressure

Seepage
&
Drainage

(Siphon)

Primary Problem
Secondary Problem

Field
Vane
Shear

50 .

30 .

15 .

20 .

15 .

20 .

15 .

20 .

15 .

(Siphon)

30 .

30 .

Dr.Warakorn Mairaing

Basic Properties
(Seive Analysis,
atterbergs
Limit, Wn, etc.)

Unconfined
Comp. Test

Triaxial
on Test

Consolidation
on Test

Lateral