IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM)

e-ISSN: 2278-5728, p-ISSN: 2319-765X. Volume 11, Issue 2 Ver. II (Mar - Apr. 2015), PP 35-46
www.iosrjournals.org

Analytical Approximate Solutions of Fifth Order More Critically

Damped Systems in the case of Smaller Triply Repeated Roots
Md. Mahafujur Rahaman1, Md. Mizanur Rahman2
1

(Department of Business Administration, Z.H. Sikder University of Science & Technology, Bangladesh)
2
(DepartmentofMathematics, Islamic University, Bangladesh)

Abstract: In order to look into the transient behavior of vibrating systems, the Krylov-Bogoliubov-Mitropolskii
(KBM) method is extensively used. The method was initially devised to obtain the periodic solutions of second
order nonlinear differential systems with small nonlinearities. In this article, the method has been modified to
investigate the solutions of fifth order more critically damped nonlinear systems. A fifth order more critically
damped nonlinear differential system is considered and asymptotic solutions are studied when the triply
eigenvalues are small and the other two equal eigenvalues are large. The results obtained by the presented
modified KBM method agree with those obtained by the fourth order Runge-Kuttamethod satisfactorily.
Keywords: KBM, nonlinearity, more critically damped system, asymptotic solution, eigenvalues

I.

Introduction

The Krylov-Bogoliubov-Mitropolskii (KBM) ([1],[2]) method is devised to obtain the approximate

solutions of weakly nonlinear systems. Popov [3] extended the method to damped oscillatory nonlinear systems
despite the fact that it was initially designed for approximating periodic solutions of second order nonlinear
differential systems with small nonlinearities. Murty and Deekshatulu [4] examined over-damped nonlinear
systems using Bogoliubovs method. Sattar [5] found an asymptotic solution of a second order critically damped
nonlinear system. Shamsul [6] suggested a technique for obtaining approximate solutions of second order overdamped and critically damped nonlinear systems. Osiniskii [7] studied solution of third order nonlinear systems
by bogoliubovs method imposing some restrictions on the parameters. As a result, the solution was oversimplified and presented incorrect results. Mulholland [8] removed these restrictions imposed by Osiniskii and
obtained desired solutions. Bojadziv [9] considered solutions of nonlinear systems by transforming it to a three
dimensional differential system. Shamsul and Sattar [10] presented a unified KBM method for solving third
order nonlinear system. Sattar [11] investigated solutions of third order over-damped nonlinear systems.
Shamsul [12] proposed solutions of third order over-damped systems whose unequal eigenvalues are integral
multiple. Shamsul and Sattar [13] presented a unified KBM method for obtaining approximate solutions of third
order damped and over-damped nonlinear systems. Kawser and Ali Akbar [14] explored an asymptotic solution
for the third order critically damped nonlinear system in the case for equal eigenvalues. Kawser and Sattar [15]
propounded an asymptotic solution of a fourth order critically damped nonlinear system with pair wise equal
eigenvalues. Akbar and Tanzer [16] extended the KBM method for solving the fifth order over-damped
nonlinear systems with cubic nonlinearity.
In this study, we have investigated the solution of fifth order more critically damped systems in the
case of smaller triply repeated roots. For different sets of initial conditions as well as for different sets of
eigenvalues the solutions show excellent coincident with the numerical solutions.

II.

The Method

Consider a fifth order weakly nonlinear ordinary differential system

xv k1 xiv k2
x k3
x k4 x k5 x f ( x, x,
x,
x , xiv )
v

(1)

iv

Where x denotes the fifth derivative, x denotes the fourth derivative of x and over dots are used to denote the
first, second and third derivatives of x with respect to t; k1, k2, k3, k4, k5 are characteristic parameters, is a small
parameter and f (x) is the given nonlinear function. As the equation is fifth order, so there are five real negative
Eigen values, and three of the Eigen values are equal (for more critically damped). Suppose the Eigen values are
, -, -, -, - . When 0 , the equation (1) becomes linear and the solution of the corresponding linear
equation is
x(t ,0) (a0 b0t c0t 2 )et (d0 h0t )e t
(2)
Where a0 ,

b0 , c0 , d 0 , h0 are constants of integration.

Where 0 following Shamsul [17] an asymptotic solution of the equation (1) is sought in the form
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11223546

www.iosrjournals.org

35 | Page

Analytical Approximate Solutions of Fifth Order More Critically Damped Systems in the case .

x(t , ) (a bt ct 2 )et (d ht )e t u1 (a, b, c, d , h, t ) ...

(3)

Where a, b, c, d, h are the functions of t and satisfy the first order differential equations

a A1 (a, b, c, d , h, t ) ...

b B1 (a, b, c, d , h, t ) ...
c C1 (a, b, c, d , h, t ) ...
d D (a, b, c, d , h, t ) ...

(4)

h H1 (a, b, c, d , h, t ) ...

x,
Now differentiating (3) five times with respect to t, substituting the value of x and the derivatives x , x ,
x , x in the original equation (1) utilizing the relations presented in (4) and finally extracting the coefficients of
, we obtain
v

2 A1 2 B1
B1 2C1 2
C
e (D ) ( 2 2 t 3
2 t 6 1 t 6C1 )
t
t
t
t
t
D
H
e t ( D )3 ( 1 2 H1 1 t ) ( D )3 ( D ) 2 u1
t
t
0
f (a, b, c, d , h, t )
t

where

iv

(5)

f (0) (a, b, c, d , h, t ) f ( x, x,
x,
x , xiv ) and x(t ,0) (a0 b0t c0t 2 )et (d0 h0t )e t
(0)

We have expanded the function f

in the Taylors series (Sattar [5], Shamsul [18], Shamsul and Sattar [13])
about the origin in power of t. Therefore, we obtain:

f (0) t q Fq ,k (a, b, c, d , h)e (i j )t

q 0 i , j , k 0

(6)

Thus, using (6), the equation (5) becomes

Following the KBM method, Murty and Deekshatulu [4], Sattar [5], Shamsul and Sattar ([10], [13]) imposed the
condition that u1 does not contain the fundamental terms of f (0). Therefore, equation (7) can be separated for
unknown functions A1, B1, C1, D1, H1 and u1 in the following way:

2 A1 2 B1
B1 2C1 2
C

3
2 t 6 1 t 6C1 )
2
2
t
t
t
t
t
D
H
e t ( D )3 ( 1 2 H1 1 t ) ( D )3 ( D ) 2 u1
t
t

t q Fq ,k (a, b, c, d , h)e (i j )t
q 0 i , j , k 0

e t ( D ) 2 (

(7)

2 A1 2 B1
B1 2C1 2
C

3
2 t 6 1 t 6C1 )
2
2
t
t
t
t
t
D
H
(8)
e t ( D ) 3 ( 1 2 H1 1 t )
t
t
1

t q Fq ,k (a, b, c, d , h)e (i j )t
q 0 i , j , k 0

e t ( D ) 2 (

DOI: 10.9790/5728-11223546

www.iosrjournals.org

36 | Page

Analytical Approximate Solutions of Fifth Order More Critically Damped Systems in the case .
And

( D )3 ( D )2 u1 t q Fq ,k (a, b, c, d , h)e (i j ) t
q 2 i , j , k 0

t 0 , t1 , t 2 from equation (8), we obtain

Now equating the coefficients of

e t ( D ) 2 (

2 A1
B
D
3 1 6C1 ) e t ( D )3 ( 1 2 H1 )
2
t
t
t

i , j , k 0

F0, K (a, b, c, d , h)e

e t ( D ) 2 (

2 B1
C
H
6 1 ) e t ( D )3 1
2
t
t
t

F1, K (a, b, c, d , h)e

e t ( D ) 2

(10)

( i j ) t

i , j ,k 0

(9)

(11)

( i j ) t

2C1

F1, K (a, b, c, d , h)e (i j )t (12)

t 2
i , j , k 0

Here, we have only three equations (10), (11) and (12) for determining the unknown functions A1, B1, C1 , D1
and H1 Thus, to obtain the unknown functions A1, B1, C1, D1 and H1 we need to impose some conditions
(Shamsul[19], [20], [21]) between the eigenvalues. Different authors imposed different conditions according to
the behavior of the systems; such as Shamsul [12] imposed the condition

i11 i22 ... inn (i1 i1 ... i1 )(1 2 ... n ) . In this study, we have investigated solutions for

the case >> . Therefore, we shall be able to separate the equation (12) for unknown functions C1 and solving
them for B1 and H1 substituting the values of C1 into the equation (11) and applying the condition >> : we
can separate the equation (11) for two unknown functions B1 and H1; and solving them for A1 and D1. Since

a, b, c, d , h are proportional to small parameter, they are slowly varying functions of time t and for first
approximate solution, we may consider them as constants in the right hand side. This assumption was first made
by Murty and Deekshatulu [22]. Thus the solutions of the equation (4) become
t

a a0 A1 (a, b, c, d , h, t )dt
0
t

b b0 B1 (a, b, c, d , h, t )dt
0
t

c c0 C1 (a, b, c, d , h, t )dt
0

(13)
t

d d0 D1 (a, b, c, d , h, t )dt
0
t

h h0 H1 (a, b, c, d , h, t )dt
0

Equation (9) is a non-homogeneous linear ordinary differential equation; therefore, it can be solved by
the well-known operator method. Substituting the values of a, b, c,d,h and u1 in the equation (3), we shall get
the complete solution of (1). Therefore, the determination of the first approximate solution is complete.

III.

Example

As an example of the above method, we have considered the Duffing type equation of fifth order
weakly-nonlinear oscillatory system:
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11223546

www.iosrjournals.org

37 | Page

Analytical Approximate Solutions of Fifth Order More Critically Damped Systems in the case .

xv k1 xiv k2
x k3
x k4 x k5 x x3
Comparing (13) and (1), we obtain

(0)

(14)

f ( x, x,
x,
x, x ) x
iv

{(a 3a bt 3ab t b3t 3 3a 2ct 2 6abct 3 3b 2ct 4 3ac 2t 4 3bc 2t 5

3

2 2

c3t 6 )e3t 3(a 2 d 2abdt b 2 dt 2 2acdt 2 2bcdt 3 c 2 dt 4 a 2 ht 2abht 2

b 2 ht 3 2acht 3 2bcht 4 c 2 ht 5 )e (2 ) t 3(ad 2 bd 2t cd 2t 2 2adht 2bdht 2

(15)

2cdht 3 ah 2t 2 bh 2t 3 ch 2t 4 )e ( 2 )t (d 3 3d 2 ht 3dh 2t 2 h3t 3 )e 3 t }

For example equation (14), the equations (9)-(12) respectively become

2 A1
B
D
3 1 6C1 ) e t ( D )3 ( 1 2 H1 ) a3e3t
2
t
t
t
2
(2 ) t
2 ( 2 )t
3 3 t
3a de
3ad e
d e

e t ( D ) 2 (

(16)

2 B1
C
H
e ( D ) ( 2 6 1 ) e t ( D )3 1 3a 2be3t 3(2abd a 2 h)
t
t
t
(2 ) t
2
( 2 )t
2
3 t
e
3(bd 2adh)e
3d he
t

(17)

2C1
3(ab 2 a 2c)e3t 3(b 2 d 2acd 2abh)e (2 )t
(18)
t 2
2
2
( 2 )t
2 3 t
3(cd 2bdh ah )e
3dh e

e t ( D ) 2

And

( D )3 ( D ) 2 u1 {(b3t 3 6abct 3 3b 2ct 4 3ac 2t 4 3bc 2t 5 c3t 6 )e 3t

3(2bcdt 3 c 2 dt 4 b 2 ht 3 2acht 3 2bcht 4 c 2 ht 5 )e (2 ) t 3(2cdht 3 (19)
bh 2t 3 ch 2t 4 )e ( 2 ) t h3t 3e 3 t }
Solution of equation (18) is

C1 l1 (ab2 a 2c)e2t l2 (b2 d 2acd 2abh)e( )t l3 (cd 2 2bdh ah 2 )e 2 t

l4 dh2e (3 )t

(20)

3
3
3
3
, l2
, l3
, l4
2
2
2
2
2
2
4 ( 3 )
4 ( )
4 ( )
4 (3 )2
C1
Now differentiating equation (20) with respect to t and putting the value of
in equation (17) and solving
t
Where l1

B1 and H1 imposing the condition >> , we get

B1 r1a 2be2t r2 (ab2 a 2c)e2t

3
9
Where r1
, r2
2
2
3
4 ( 3 )
4 ( 3 )2

(21)

And

H1 p1 (2abd a 2 h)e2t p2 (bd 2 2adh)e( )t p3d 2 he2 t p4 (b 2 d

2acd 2abh)e2t p5 (cd 2 2bdh ah2 )e( )t p6 dh2e2 t

DOI: 10.9790/5728-11223546

www.iosrjournals.org

(22)

38 | Page

Analytical Approximate Solutions of Fifth Order More Critically Damped Systems in the case .

3
3
9
3
, p2
, p3
, p4
,
3
3
3
2 ( )
8 ( )
( ) 4
2 (3 )
9
9
p5 4
, p6
.
8 ( )
(3 )4
B1
Again, putting the value
, C1 and H1 in Eq. (10) and solving A1 and D1 and imposing the condition >>
t
Where p1

we get
(23)
A1 q1a3e2t q2a 2be2t (q3 q4 )(a 2c ab2 )e2t
1
9
27
9
Where q1
, q2
, q3
, q4
2
2
3
2
4
2
4
4 ( 3 )
8 ( 3 )
8 ( 3 )
8 ( 3 ) 2
And

D1 n1a 2 de2t n2 ad 2e ( )t n3d 3e2 t n4 (b 2 d 2acd 2abh)e 2t n5 (cd 2 2bdh

ah 2 )e ( )t n6 dh 2e2 t n7 (2abd a 2 h)e2t n8 (bd 2 2adh)e ( ) t n9 d 2 he2 t

(24)

n10 (b 2 d 2acd 2abh)e 2t n11 (cd 2 2bdh ah 2 )e ( )t n12 dh2 e2 t

3
3
1
9
Where n1
, n2
, n3
, n4
,
3
3
3
2 ( )
8 ( )
2 (3 )
( ) 5
9
3
3
9
n5
, n6
, n7
, n8
,
5
2
3
3
5
(3 )
2 ( )
8 ( ) 2
16 ( )
3
9
9
9
n9 2
, n10 2
, n11
, n12 2
3
4
4
2
2 (3 )
( )
4 ( )
( 3 )4
The solution of the equation (19) for u1 is

u1 e 3t {(b3 6abc)(m1t 3 m2t 2 m3t m4 ) (b 2c ac 2 )(m5t 4 m6t 3 m7t 2

m8t m9 ) bc 2 (m10t 5 m11t 4 m12t 3 m13t 2 m14t m15 ) c 3 (m16t 6 m17t 5
m18t 4 m19t 3 m20t 2 m21t m22 )} e (2 ) t {(2bch 2ach b 2 h) (m23t 3 m24t 2
m25t m26 ) (c 2 d 2bch)(m27t 4 m28t 3 m29t 2 m30t m31 ) c 2 h(m32t 5 m33t 4

(25)

m34t 3 m35t 2 m36t m37 )} e ( 2 ) t {(2cdh bh 2 ) (m38t 3 m39t 2 m40t m41 )

ch 2 (m42t 4 m43t 3 m44t 2 m45t m46 )} e 3 t h3 (m47t 3 m48t 2 m49t m50 )
Where

e3t
3e3t
3
2
m1 3
, m2 3
(
),
2
2
8 (3 )
8 (3 ) 2 3
m3

3e3t
3
3
3
( 2

),
3
2
2
4 (3 ) 2
(3 ) (3 )

m4

3e3t
5
4
9
3
3e3t
(

)
m

,
,
5
4 3 (3 )2 4 3 (3 )3 2 (3 ) 2 2 (3 )
8 3 ( 3 ) 2

3e3t
3
2
9e3t
3
3
3
m6 3
(
) , m7 3
( 2

),
2
2
2
2 ( 3 ) 2 3
2 ( 3 ) 2
(3 ) (3 )

DOI: 10.9790/5728-11223546

www.iosrjournals.org

39 | Page

Analytical Approximate Solutions of Fifth Order More Critically Damped Systems in the case .

m8

9e3t
5
4
9
3
( 3

2
),
3
2
3
2
( 3 ) 4 (3 ) 2 (3 ) (3 )

9e3t
15
5
9
6
20
m9 3
(

3
),
2
4
4
2
3
( 3 ) 16 (3 ) 2 (3 ) (3 ) (3 )
m10

3e3t
15e3t
3
2
m

(
),
,
11
3
2
3
2
8 ( 3 )
8 ( 3 ) 2 3

m12

15e3t
3
3
3
( 2

),
3
2
2
2 ( 3 ) 2
(3 ) (3 )

m13

45e3t
5
4
9
3
( 3

2
),
3
2
3
2
2 ( 3 ) 8
(3 ) 2 (3 ) (3 )

m14

45e3t
15
5
5
6
9
(

2
),
3
2
4
4
2
3
( 3 ) 16 (3 ) 2 (3 ) (3 ) 2 (3 )2

m15

45e3t
21
6
15
15
15
6
(

3
2
),
3
2
5
5
4
2
( 3 ) 32 (3 ) 8 (3 ) 2 (3 ) 4 (3 ) (3 )3

m16

e3t
3e3t
3
2
m

(
),
,
17
3
2
3
2
8 ( 3 )
4 ( 3 ) 2 3

15e3t
3
3
3
m18 3
( 2

),
2
2
4 ( 3 ) 2
(3 ) (3 )
m19

15e3t
5
4
9
3
( 3

2
),
3
2
3
2
( 3 ) 4 (3 ) 2 (3 ) (3 )

m20

45e3t
15
5
9
6
20
(

3
),
3
2
4
4
2
3
( 3 ) 16 (3 ) 2 (3 ) (3 ) (3 )

m21

90e3t
21
6
15
6
15
15
(

),
3 ( 3 )2 32 5 (3 )5 4 3 (3 )2 2 (3 )3 2 (3 ) 4 8 4 (3 )

90e3t
7
7
21
9
45
(

2
6
6
5
5
4
( 3 ) 16 (3 ) 16 (3 ) (3 ) 16 (3 ) 2
15
5
2
3
),
4
2 (3 ) 4 (3 )3

m22

m23

3e (2 )t
9e (2 )t 1
3
m

(
),
,
24
2
3
2
3
4 ( )
4 ( )

m25

9e (2 )t
3
3
6
( 2

),
2
3
2 ( ) 4
( ) ( ) 2

9e (2 )t
1
6
10
9
m26 2
( 3

2
),
3
2
3
2 ( ) 2
( ) ( ) 4 ( )
m27

3e (2 )t
3e (2 )t 1
3
m

(
),
,
28
2
3
2
3
4 ( )
( )

m29

9e (2 )t
3
3
6
( 2

),
2
3
( ) 4 ( ) ( ) 2

DOI: 10.9790/5728-11223546

www.iosrjournals.org

40 | Page

Analytical Approximate Solutions of Fifth Order More Critically Damped Systems in the case .

m30

18e (2 )t 1
6
10
9
( 3

2
),
2
3
2
3
( ) 2 ( ) ( ) 4 ( )

18e (2 )t 15
10
15
3
9
m31 2
(

3
2
),
3
4
3
4
( ) 16 ( ) ( ) 2 ( ) 2 ( ) 2
m32

3e (2 )t
15e (2 )t 1
3
m

(
),
,
33
2
3
2
3
4 ( )
4 ( )

m34

15e (2 )t 3
3
6
( 2

),
2
3
( ) 4 ( ) ( )2

m35

45e (2 )t 1
6
10
9
( 3

2
),
2
3
2
3
( ) 2 ( ) ( ) 4 ( )

m36

90e (2 )t 15
10
15
3
9
(

3
2
),
2
3
4
3
4
( ) 16 ( ) ( ) 2 ( ) 2 ( ) 2

m37

90e (2 )t
3
15
15
21
15
3
(

2
3
),
2
3
5
4
4
5
3
( ) 16 ( ) 16 ( ) ( ) 2 ( ) ( ) 2

m38

3e ( 2 )t
9e ( 2 )t
3
2
m

(
),
,
39
3
2
3
2
8 ( )
8 ( ) 2

9e ( 2 )t
3
3
3
m40
( 2

),
3
2
2
4 ( ) 2
( ) ( )
m41

9e ( 2 )t
5
4
3
9
( 3
2

),
3
2
3
4 ( ) 4
( ) ( ) 2 ( ) 2

m42

3e ( 2 )t
3e ( 2 )t
3
2
m

(
),
,
43
3
2
3
2
8 ( )
2 ( ) 2

9e ( 2 )t
3
3
3
m44
( 2

),
3
2
2
2 ( ) 2
( ) ( )
m45

9e ( 2 )t
5
4
3
9
( 3
2

),
3
2
3
( ) 4 ( ) ( ) 2 ( ) 2

m46

9e ( 2 )t
15
5
5
6
9
(

2
),
3
2
4
4
3
( ) 16 ( ) 2 ( ) ( ) 2 ( ) 2

m47

e3t
3e3t
3
1
m

(
),
,
48
2
3
2
3
4 (3 )
4 (3 ) 3

m49

3e3t
6
3
3
(
2
),
2
3
2
2 (3 ) (3 ) 4
(3 )

m50

3e3t
10
1
9
6
(

)
2 2 (3 )3 (3 )3 2 3 4 2 (3 ) (3 ) 2

Substituting the values of A1, B1, C1, D1 and H1 and from equation (23), (21), (20), (24) and (22) into equation
(4), we obtain:

a {q1a3e2t q2 a 2be2t (q3 q4 )(a 2c ab2 )e2t }

b {r a 2be2t r (ab2 a 2c)e2t }
1

2
2t

c {l1 (ab a c)e

2

l2 (b2d 2acd 2abh)e( )t l3 (cd 2 2bdh ah2 )e2 t l4dh2e(3 )t }

DOI: 10.9790/5728-11223546

www.iosrjournals.org

41 | Page

Analytical Approximate Solutions of Fifth Order More Critically Damped Systems in the case .

d {n1a 2 de2t n2 ad 2e ( )t n3d 3e2 t n4 (b 2 d 2acd 2abh)e 2t n5 (cd 2 2bdh

ah2 )e ( )t n6 dh2 e2 t n7 (2abd a 2 h)e2t n8 (bd 2 2adh)e ( ) t n9 d 2 he 2 t
n10 (b 2 d 2acd 2abh)e 2t n11 (cd 2 2bdh ah 2 )e ( ) t n12 dh2 e2 t }
(26)

h { p1 (2abd a h)e
2

2 t

p2 (bd 2adh)e
2

( )t

p3d he
2

2 t

p4 (b d 2acd
2

2abh)e2t p5 (cd 2 2bdh ah2 )e ( ) t p6 dh2e2 t }

Here all of the equation of (26) have no exact solutions, but since a , b, c, d , h are proportional to the small
parameter , so they are slowly varying functions of time t. Consequently, it is possible to replace a, b, c, d, h
by their respective values obtained in linear case (i.e., the values of a, b, c, d, h obtained when = 0) in the right
hand side of equation (26). This type of replacement was first introduced by Murty and Deekshatulu ([4], [22])
to solve similar type of nonlinear equations.
Therefore, the solution of (26) is:

1 e2t
1 e2t
1 e2t
q2 a 2b
(q3 q4 )(a 2c ab 2 )
}
2
2
2
1 e2t
1 e2t
b b0 {r1a 2b
r2 (ab2 a 2c)
}
2
2
1 e2t
1 e( )t
c c0 {l1 (ab 2 a 2c)
l2 (b 2 d 2acd 2abh)
l3 (cd 2
2

a a0 {q1a3

1 e2 t
1 e (3 ) t
2bdh ah )
l4 dh 2
}
2
3

(27)

2 t

1 e
d d 0 {n1a 2 d
2

n2 ad 2

1 e ( )t
1 e2 t
n3d 3
n4 (b 2 d 2acd 2abh)

1 e2t
1 e ( )t
1 e 2 t
1 e 2t
n5 (cd 2 2bdh ah 2 )
n6 dh 2
n7 (2abd a 2 h)
2

2
2
n8 (bd 2 2adh)

1 e( )t
1 e2 t
1 e 2 t
n9 d 2 h
n10 (b 2 d 2acd 2abh)

2
2

n11 (cd 2 2bdh ah 2 )

1 e ( )t
1 e2 t
n12 dh 2
}

2
2 t

1 e
h h0 { p1 (2abd a 2 h)
2
2acd 2abh)

p2 (bd 2 2adh)

1 e ( )t
1 e2 t
p3d 2 h
p4 (b 2 d

1 e2t
1 e( )t
1 e2 t
p5 (cd 2 2bdh ah 2 )
p6 dh 2
}
2

Hence, we obtain the first approximate solution of the equation (14) as:

x(t , ) (a bt ct 2 )et (d ht )e t u1 (28)

wherea, b, c,d and h are given by the equation (27) and

IV.

u1 is given by (25).

Figures and Tables

In order to test the accuracy of an approximate solution obtained by a certain perturbation method, we
have compared the approximate solution to the numerical solution.We have computed
which a, b, c,d and h are obtained from (27) and
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11223546

u1

x(t , )

using (28), in

is calculated from equation (25). The result obtained from

www.iosrjournals.org

42 | Page

Analytical Approximate Solutions of Fifth Order More Critically Damped Systems in the case .
(28) for various values of t, and the corresponding numerical solution obtained by a fourth order Runge-Kutta
method is presented in the followingFig.1,Fig.2,Fig.3 and Fig.4respectively.
0.9
Perturbation Result

0.8

Numerical Result

0.7
0.6
x

0.5
0.4

0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0

3
t

Figure 1: Comparison between perturbation and numerical results for 3.6, 0.95 and 0.1
with the initial conditions a0 0.45, b0 0.25, c0 0.15, d0 0.30, h0 0.25.

0.8
Perturbation Result

0.7

Numerical Result

0.6

0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2

0.1
0
0

3
t

Figure 2: Comparison between perturbation and numerical results for 3.5, 0.9 and 0.1
with the initial conditions a0 0.45, b0 0.35, c0 0.10, d0 0.25, h0 0.20.

DOI: 10.9790/5728-11223546

www.iosrjournals.org

43 | Page

Analytical Approximate Solutions of Fifth Order More Critically Damped Systems in the case .
0.8
Perturbation Result

0.7

Numerical Result

0.6

0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0

3
t

Figure 3: Comparison between perturbation and numerical results for 3.2, 0.8 and 0.1
with the initial conditions a0 0.40, b0 0.30, c0 0.10, d0 0.25, h0 0.15.

0.6
Perturbation Result
0.5

Numerical Result

0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0

3
t

Figure 4: Comparison between perturbation and numerical results for 3, 0.7 and 0.1
with the initial conditions a0 0.35, b0 0.35, c0 0.10, d0 0.15, h0 0.15.

For various values of t, the corresponding perturbation andnumerical results are shown in the following Table 1,
Table 2, Table 3andTable 4 respectively.

DOI: 10.9790/5728-11223546

www.iosrjournals.org

44 | Page

Analytical Approximate Solutions of Fifth Order More Critically Damped Systems in the case .

Table 1:Comparison between perturbation andTable 2:Comparison between perturbation and

numeicalresults
numerical results

Table 3:Comparison between perturbation andTable 4:Comparison between perturbation and

numerical results
numerical results

V.

Conclusion

In this study, we have carried out the modification of the KBM method and successfully applied the
modified method to the fifth order more critically damped nonlinear systems. Based on the modified KBM
method transient responses of nonlinear differential systems have been investigated. For fifth order more
critically damped systems the solutions are looked for such circumstances where in the triply eigenvalues are
small and the two eigenvalues are large. For different sets of initial conditions of the modified KBM method, the
results provide solutions which show well agreement with the numerical solutions

Acknowledgements
The authors are indebted to Mr. M. A. Kawser, Assistant Professor, Islamic University, for his invaluable
comments on the earlier draft of this paper.

References
[1].
[2].
[3].
[4].
[5].

N. N. Krylov and N. N.Bogoliubov, Introduction to Nonlinear Mechanics(New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1947).
N. N.Bogoliubov and Y.Mitropolskii, Asymptotic Methods in the Theory of Nonlinear Oscillations (New York, Gordan and
Breach, 1961).
I. P.Popov, A Generalization of the Bogoliubov Asymptotic Method in the Theory of Nonlinear Oscillations (in Russian), Dokl.
Akad. USSR, 3, 1956, 308-310.
I. S. N. Murty and B. L. Deekshatulu, and G.Krishna, On an Asymptotic Method of Krylov-Bogoliubov for Over-damped Nonlinear
Systems, J. Frank. Inst.,288, 1969, 49-65.
M. A. Sattar, An asymptotic Method for Second Order Critically Damped Nonlinear Equations, J. Frank. Inst., 321, 1986, 109-113.

DOI: 10.9790/5728-11223546

www.iosrjournals.org

45 | Page

Analytical Approximate Solutions of Fifth Order More Critically Damped Systems in the case .
[6].
[7].
[8].
[9].
[10].
[11].
[12].
[13].
[14].
[15].
[16].
[17].
[18].
[19].
[20].
[21].
[22].

M. S. Alam, Asymptotic Methods for Second Order Over-damped and Critically Damped Nonlinear Systems, Soochow Journal of
Math., 27, 2001, 187-200.
Z.Osiniskii, Vibration of a One Degree Freedom System with Nonlinear Internal Friction and Relaxation, Proceedings of
International Symposium of Nonlinear Vibrations, Kiev, Izadt, Akad, Nauk USSR, 111, 1963, 314-325.
R. J.Mulholland, Nonlinear Oscillations of Third Order Differential Equation, Int. J. Nonlinear Mechanics, 6, 1971, 279-294.
G. N. Bojadziev, Damped Nonlinear Oscillations Modeled by a 3-dimensional Differential System, ActaMechanica, 48, 1983, 193201.
M. S. Alam and M. A.Sattar,A Unified KBM Method for Solving Third Order Nonlinear Systems, Indian J. pure appl. Math., 28,
1997, 151-167.
M. A. Sattar, An Asymptotic Method for Three-dimensional Over-damped Nonlinear Systems, Ganit, J. Bangladesh Math. Soc., 13,
1993, 1-8.
M. S. Alam, Perturbation Theory for n-th Order Nonlinear Systems with Large Damping, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math, 33, 2002,
1677-1684.
M. S. Alam and M. A.Sattar, An Asymptotic Method for Third Order Critically Damped Nonlinear Equations, J. Math. andPhy.
Sci., 30, 1996, 291-298.
M. A. Kawser and M. A. Akbar, An Asymptotic Solution for the Third Order Critically Damped Nonlinear System in the Case for
Small Equal Eigenvalues, J. Math. Forum, XXII, 2010, 52-68.
M.A. Kawser and M. A.Sattar, An Asymptotic Solution of a Fourth Order Critically Damped Nonlinear System with Pair Wise
Equal Eigenvalues, Res. J. Math. Stat., 3(1), 2011, 1-11.
S. T. A. Siddique and M. A. Akbar, Asymptotic Solution of Fifth Order Over-Damped Nonlinear Systems with Cubic Nonlinearity,
Studies in Mathematical Science, 3(1),2011, 24-34.
M. S. Alam and M. B.Hossain, On Some Special Conditions of n-th Order Non-oscillatory Nonlinear Systems, Communication of
Korean Math. Soc., 18, 2003, 755-765.
M. S. Alam, Generalised Asymptotic method of KBM non-linear system, Pure Appl. Math. Sci.,51, 2000, 43-55.
M. S. Alam, KBM Method for Certain Non-oscillatory Non-linear System, Journal of Bangladesh Academy of Science, 25(2),
2001, 193-202.
M. S. Alam, A Unified Krylov-Bogoliubov-Mitropolskii Method for Solving n-th Order Nonlinear Systems, J. Frank. Inst., 339,
2002, 239-248.
M. S. Alam, Method of Solution to the n-th Order Over-damped Nonlinear Systems Under Some Special Conditions, Bull. Cal.
Math. Soc., 94, 2002, 437-440.
I. S. N. Murty and B. L.Deekshatulu, Method of Variation of Parameters for Over-Damped Nonlinear Systems, J. Control,9, 1969,
259-266.

DOI: 10.9790/5728-11223546

www.iosrjournals.org

46 | Page