9 views

Uploaded by Miguel Angel Martin Contreras

Summary of geometry in AdS/CFT correspondence

save

- 5 Variable Karnaugh Map Example
- Nucl.Phys.B v.789
- (International Series of Monographs on Physics 164) Pitaevski, Lev_ Stringari, Sandro-Bose-Einstein Condensation and Superfluidity-Oxford University Press (2016)
- Lev Rozansky- An infinite torus braid yields a categorified Jones-Wenzl projector
- Matter Mattering Materiality
- CHM650outline.pdf
- A Modern Course in the Quantum Theory of Solids Capitulo 1
- 724_1713 (2)
- Isometry Groups
- Wolfgang Ernst Pauli
- tmp8BE4.tmp
- Fundamental Physical Basis for Maxwell-Heaviside Gravitomagnetism
- QFT Lectures on AdS_CFT.pdf
- AdS QCD Model
- Solucion1.pdf
- MIT Course on AdS-CFT Corrspondence
- Taller 06
- Taller 12.pdf

Correspondence

M. A. Martin Contreras∗, J. M. R. Roldan Giraldo†

High Energy Group, Department of Physics, University of los Andes

Abstract

In this paper an analysis of the geometrical construction of the AdS/CFT Correspondence

is made. A geometrical definition of the configuration manifold and the boundary manifold

in terms of the conformal compactification scheme is given. As a conclusion, it was obtained

that the usual definition of the correspondence [2] is strongly dependent of the unicity of the

conformal class of metrics on the boundary. Finally, a summary of some of the geometrical

issues of the correspondence is made, along with a possible way to avoid them.

1

Introduction

**Gravity/Gauge duality is maybe one of the most important developments of the latest times in
**

String Theory. From its very begining, dual models have been applied in many areas different from

High Energy Physics or Black Hole Physics. Any branch of Physics that exhibits phase transitions

can be modeled using dual models[1].

The central idea of Gravity/Gauge duality is the geometrical connection existing between any

Gravity Theory (Superstrings, for example) in d+1 dimensions to a QFT living in d dimensions. In

fact, it can be said that we can extract information about QFT from spacetime, and viceversa. This

is just a conjecture, and it still needs a proof. Once the connection between bulk and boundary is

stablished, the next step is to write of a proper holographic dictionary, allowing to switch between

gravity and QFT.

AdS/CFT Correspondence [2] is the most relevant realization of the Gravity/Gauge duality, but

is not the only successful one. Some examples of this kind of duality are the Klebanov–Strassler

duality [3] or the NS5–branes/LST [4]. In all the three cases mentioned above, the bulk is a

non–compact manifold endowed with gravity, such that the dual gauge theory is encoded in its

asymptotic behavior.

∗

†

**ma.martin41@uniandes.edu.co
**

jroldan@uniandes.edu.co

1

The supergravity description is valid only for the large N and large ’tHooft coupling λ. O. ∂ M. Mi ]+O 1 1 . This conformal boundary has a topology of R1. it is possible to take a low energy limit in (1) in order to reduce the string generating function to a supergravity one. in the Maldacena’s original proposal. as for example. fixing a conformal boundary at the origin of the radial coordinate of AdS5 . Since the solution is not unique. WCF T [φ0 . the Anti de Sitter space is covered partially with a Poincare chart AdS5 that picks up one of the two folds of the hyperbolic space. The idea behind the AdS/CFT Correspondence is the geometrical connection between the isomeries of AdS and the conformal group. The conjecture in principle can be made with any background M that satisfies string equations of motion and has a the pair (∂ M . which is in the conformal boundary of AdS. To be more precise. All of these topologies are diffeomorphical between each other. (1) where M is the manifold where gravity lies. S 1 × R3 or S 1 × H3 [6]. As a conclusion.e. it is possible to obtain different holographies according to the choice of chart. AdS and any CFT are essentially the same thing. at inner level. O. the correlation functions are dependent from the choice of coordinates. φ is a bulk field with φ0 as the value at the conformal boundary ∂M. ∂ M. Choices of different charts on Anti de Sitter space lead to boundaries as R4 . η] = −ln ZCF T [φ0 . The conjecture stablishes that φ0 acts as a Schwinger source for any CFT operator O living on ∂ M. 2 . encoded in the holographic dictionary. (2) +O √ N λ where the sum in the supergravity action appears to take into account the chart dependence. η] . The conformal boundary carries a metric in a fixed conformal class [η]. These divergences must be renormalized [7] and could lead to anomalies. For example.. the dual models of QGP using Dp/Dq branes as gravitational background. The utility of the correspondence comes in the calculation procedure. its isomeries are holomorphic to the Poincare Group. The statement of the correspondence is ZString [φ. η] = X i ZSUGRA [φ. Thanks to this. Some remarks. since AdS is a maximally symmetric space. which relates SUGRA backgrounds at strong coupling with CFT at weak coupling. In this duality we link gravity in a weakly curved AdS5 × S 5 with a CFT in 3 + 1 dimensions. i.3 . This has a deeper implication in the foundations of the correspondence. AdS/CFT Correspondence has strong/weak duality too.2 AdS/CFT Correspondence in a Nutshell The most representative holographic duality is the AdS/CFT Correspondence (Maldacena 1998). O. Since the Anti de Sitter radius and the string lenght are free parameters. This implies that. This is the essence of the correspondence. Note that the supergravity action can carry divergences due to infinite volume or IR behaviour. S 1 × S 3 . ∂ M. because different charts could lead to different dualities. which is the relation between the bulk and the boundary physics. the charts over M are not trivial. it has been possible to construct toy models for thermal (non perturbative) QCD. η). M] = ZCF T [φ0 .

The dictionary is obtained following the saddle point approximation and the functional standard techniques from the supergravity on-shell action: .

on-shell [φ0 ..] . ..

.

. (3) δφ0 (x1 ) .. δ n SSUGRA hO (x1 ) O (x2 ) .O (xn )iCF T = ...φ0 (xn ) .

(4) ˜ and df is not zero on ∂ M ˜ . The compactification defines an induced ˜. 3 . The restricted moduli space of M . the AdS/CFT Correspondence can be summarized saying that given any ˜ . g). Recall class [η] (called conformal infinity) of η on ∂ M that [η] is uniquely determined by the pair (M.[η]) . M(∂ M˜ . thus not all the metrics g on M will contribute to the partition function on the bulk. the entire moduli space of M . Both manifolds must have the same causal structure. The pair (∂ M η ∈ [η]. Following the discussions above. This is the path followed. g). with f −1 (0) = ∂ M The metric g˜ is called compactification of the metric g. This problem can be avoided using the conformal ˜ defined by conformal transformations of η. the correspondence is build up using the complex geometry language. the dilaton is related with the string coupling. and hence many conformal compactifications of a given metric g. for example.Sources=0 Expresion (3) tells how to connect fields in both sides. For each possible supergravity action a dictionary can be constructed. is restricted by the choice of a conformal class [η]. n+1-dimensional manifold (M ˜ ) on A complete Riemmann metric g on M is called conformally compact 1 if a function f ∈ Ω0 (M ˜ exist such that M g˜ = f 2 g. M ˜ is Since the symmetries of M and ∂ M ∂M defined by M∂ M˜ = Teich(M )/MCG(M ). then the choice of η is not unique. in AdS/QCD models [8]. For example. the moduli space of ∂ M ˜ . [η]) by means of the bulk data (M. Along with this manifold. η) with causal structure of spacetime is conserved under conformal transformations. This manifold M will be the configuration space for the possible physical states on the bulk.1 Formal Aspects Geometrically speaking. ˜ must be the same2 . Consider a open n + 1-dimensional manifold (M. it is possible to construct (or obtain) a boundary (∂ M 1 2 Conformally compact is equivalent to Penrose compact. Under these ideas. 3 Geometrical Approximation to the Correspondence 3. Such a function is called a defining function [9]. defines the conformal boundary. g). where the CFT operators are constructed. such that M ⊂ M ˜. M. metric η = g˜|∂ M˜ on ∂ M There are many defining functions. is defined as the set of all the conformally compact metrics g on M [10]. the choice of [η] implies that the ˜ . g˜) with no empty n-dimensional boundary ∂ M ˜ . we define a closed ˜ . Physically. since both manifolds must have the same conformal stucture because they are diffeomorphic.

and because given a conformal infinity [η] of (M. The exact form of the series depends on whether n is even or odd. + rn g(n) + terms depending of even or odd n. knowing g(0) and g(n) allow to construct the bulk metric field g from the expansion (7). in ∂ M Mathematically. These compactifications are useful for computational purposes. The Fefferman–Graham expansion [11] of g is a truncated where gf is a family of metrics on ∂ M Taylor-type expansion of the family of metrics gf . 10]. with α the Hoelder exponent. i. 4 . In a general case.2 Geodesic Compactifications Any compactification (4) with a defining function given by fg = Distg (x. As a conclusion. M must be 10-dimensional. The g(n) term is a little more complex. The real problem here is to know the convergence of the series and how its inclusion may introduce anomalies [12]. in order to have a conformal boundary as R(1. All the metrics g that satisfies these conditions are the so called asymptotically hyperbolic Einstein metrics. in which M is factorized as AdS5 × S 5 .Thus. (5) g∈M(∂ M ˜ . g) exists a unique geodesic defining function f[η] that has η ∈ [η] as a boundary metric. The g(n) factor corresponds to the stress–energy tensor of the CFT living ˜. The extra terms depending on the even–odd character of n are calculated from the Einstein equations for η. Following the Gauss lemma. g(n) is transverse traceless. Boundary Bulk z }| { { z X }| ˜ Z ∂ M . these expansions can be obtained by compactifying the Einstein equations and taking Lie derivatives of g˜ with fg = 0: g(k) = 1 (k) L ˜ g˜.3) . (7) where η := g(0) and the coefficients g(k) with 1 < k < n are locally fixed by the curvature of η and its covariant derivatives. In odd dimensions. M has to be decomposed into M = H5 × X 5 . with X 5 some compact space. [η] = Z (g. (6) ˜ .4 ⊂ H5 . For even dimensions. . the compactificacion g˜ can be expanded into g˜ = dr2 + gf . as in the AdS/CFT Correspondence. all the expansions hold up to order m + α.conformal compactification scheme (4). . such that in the compactification limit M v R2. M ) . g(n) is not traceless but is still determined by global aspects of M .[η]) Following physical arguments from AdS/CFT Correspondence. the series can be written as gf = g(0) + r g(1) + r2 g(2) + .e. but is determined by global properties of M . g k! ∇f (8) If the metric is Hoelder. M ) is called geodesic [9. that depends on the dimensionality n of M . 3.

A quantum approach (thinking on strings instead of supergravity) requires a more general factorization M = X × Y . When closed and compact manifolds are considered. the conjecture is build up in conformal boundaries. Asymptotically AdS spaces are related to the usual 10-dimensional AdSn+2 × S 8−n through a Weyl transformation. thus the holographic dictionary (3) is not univocally.3. the index theorem fails. i. only on asymptotically AdS spaces it is possible to do non conformal holography. Another issue arises when the index theory comes into play. that is no realistic. all of the approach to the conjecture was classical. This transformation redefines the coupling constant of the QFT on the conformal boundary including an energy scale with no trivial running. real manifolds only. The usual chart used to do holography is the Poincare chart. 13]. the central idea for the construction of the conjecture is the existence of a ˜ . 5 Conclusions AdS/CFT Correspondence is strongly related to the concept of conformal boundary. Leaving aside the limits. The main problem with these structures lies on the construction of Calabi-Yau metrics. 5 . The idea is to categorize all the possible X manifolds in the decomposition M = X × Y into spaces that are asymptotically AdS and those which are not. Gravity/Gauge duality suggests that any quantum field theory must have a string dual. The construction of this boundary is dependent on the chosen charts. This implies that holographic extension only can be made on AdS-like spaces. where X ∈ H5 and Y is a 5-dimensional Calabi–Yau manifold. The large N and large λ limits restrict the possible dual models to the AdS/CFT Correspondence. But this is not the only problem. to obtain a nonconformal holography would imply the naive idea of taking a different background from Type IIB supergravity. where the index of any pseudodifferential operator is well defined. Following [9. In a realistic approximation. Non-conformal extensions are made relaxing the conformal symmetry of AdS5 × S 5 . This process is highly depending on the conformal infinty [η] that fixes a conformal boundary ∂ M convergence of the Fefferman-Graham expansion (7). As a conclusion from [14]. Advances in this scenario were given by Skenderis and Taylor with their precision holography [14].3 General Decomposition of M Until now. The Calabi-Yau manifold can be justified on the grounds that classical mechanics requires a simplectic structure while quantum mechanics requires complex structure to implement unitarity. This problem can be partially avoided by considering Y as a 5-dimensional Sasaki-Einstein manifold [13].e. 4 Geometrical Issues As it was said above. This problem leads to the consideration of the definition and the role of the boundary in AdS/CFT Correspondence [10]. which could introduce undesirable anomalies due to the holographic renormalization.

Anti-de Sitter boundary in Poincare coordinates. Springer. [8] U. JHEP 9810:004 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9808149] [5] E. Kustasov. D. (2005). e1744e1764 (2009). arXiv:hep-th/9803131v2. Klebanov. E. Waldram. IRMA Lectures in Mathematics and Theoretical Physics: AdS/CFT Correspondence: Einstein Metrics and their Conformal Boundaries. IRMA Lectures in Mathematics and Theoretical Physics: AdS/CFT Correspondence: Einstein Metrics and their Conformal Boundaries. [10] M.(2007). [arXiv:hep-th/9711200]. B 546: 52-64 (1999). Sanchez. Gaunttlet. Papantonopoulos. 2. Theor. Gen. Strassler. (2005). Witten. Sparks. R. 95 . Phys. Editor. Conformal Anomaly Of Submanifold Observables In AdS/CFT Correspondence. N. Causal boundaries and holography on wave type spacetimes.The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity Adv. Aharony. T. Linear Dilatons.The choice of a Calabi-Yau (or a Sasaki–Einstein) manifold as the compact space in the factorization AdS5 ×Y 5 . Ballon Bayona. Asterisque (1985). M. [6] C. 39: 1367-1379. J. 1998. Kiritsis. Supersymmetric AdS backgrounds in String and M-theory. R. A. [2] J. [12] C. Thermal Phase Transition. From Gravity to Thermal Gauge Theories: The AdS/CFT Correspondence. Anderson. Braga. Ellie Cartan et les mathematiques d’aujourd’hui (1984). [11] C. References [1] E. (2005). R. J. P. [13] J. Witten. Nonlinear Analysis 71. AdS/CFT Correspondence and Geometry. 6 . E. D. and Confinement in Gauge Theories. JHEP 0802. Rel. D. Fefferman. M. IRMA Lectures in Mathematics and Theoretical Physics: AdS/CFT Correspondence: Einstein Metrics and their Conformal Boundaries. [4] O. Graham. Skenderis. 019 (2008). Martelli. Phys. 2011. [3] I. NS5-branes and holography. Grav. Berkooz.116. Geometrical Aspects of the AdS/CFT Correspondence. Conformal invariants. Graham. M. C. Papadimitriou. N. F. K. Math. 231 (1998). JHEP 0008:052 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/0007191]. besides the relaxation of the large N and large λ limits could lead to string/QFT duality. [9] M. Nucl. Supergravity and confining gauge theory: Duality Cascades and χSB-resolution of Naked Singularities. [7] I. Anti-de Sitter Space. Gursoy. Seiberg. Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD Part 1. Maldacena.

M.[14] I. 094 (2008). Taylor. Precision Holography for non-conformal branes. Kanitscheider. K. JHEP 09. 7 . Skenderis.

- 5 Variable Karnaugh Map ExampleUploaded byRobert Lim
- Nucl.Phys.B v.789Uploaded bybuddy72
- (International Series of Monographs on Physics 164) Pitaevski, Lev_ Stringari, Sandro-Bose-Einstein Condensation and Superfluidity-Oxford University Press (2016)Uploaded byDiana Uriza
- Lev Rozansky- An infinite torus braid yields a categorified Jones-Wenzl projectorUploaded byDuncan_Vim
- Matter Mattering MaterialityUploaded byAndrew Glynn
- CHM650outline.pdfUploaded bySoraya
- A Modern Course in the Quantum Theory of Solids Capitulo 1Uploaded byBaco Davis
- 724_1713 (2)Uploaded byViplav Singh
- Isometry GroupsUploaded bymiguel lazarte chavez
- Wolfgang Ernst PauliUploaded bymt05
- tmp8BE4.tmpUploaded byFrontiers
- Fundamental Physical Basis for Maxwell-Heaviside GravitomagnetismUploaded byscribdfabs

- QFT Lectures on AdS_CFT.pdfUploaded byMiguel Angel Martin Contreras
- AdS QCD ModelUploaded byMiguel Angel Martin Contreras
- Solucion1.pdfUploaded byMiguel Angel Martin Contreras
- MIT Course on AdS-CFT CorrspondenceUploaded byMiguel Angel Martin Contreras
- Taller 06Uploaded byMiguel Angel Martin Contreras
- Taller 12.pdfUploaded byMiguel Angel Martin Contreras