Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evaluation of CO2 Gas Injection For Major Oil Production Fields in Malaysia
Experimental Approach Case Study: Dulang Field
Zahidah Md. Zain, Nor Idah Kechut, Ganesan Nadeson, PETRONAS Research & Scientific Services Sdn. Bhd., Noraini
Ahmad, Oil Business, PETRONAS, Dr. DM Anwar Raja, Technology Management Unit, PETRONAS Carigali Sdn. Bhd.
Copyright 2001, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc.
This paper was prepared for presentation at the SPE Asia Pacific Improved Oil Recovery
Conference held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 89 October 2001.
This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE Program Committee following review of
information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper, as
presented, have not been reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to
correction by the author(s). The material, as presented, does not necessarily reflect any
position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, its officers, or members. Papers presented at
SPE meetings are subject to publication review by Editorial Committees of the Society of
Petroleum Engineers. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper
for commercial purposes without the written consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers is
prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300
words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous
acknowledgment of where and by whom the paper was presented. Write Librarian, SPE, P.O.
Box 833836, Richardson, TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435.
Abstract
In meeting the challenge to improve oil recovery through
implementation of IOR techniques, Dulang field was selected
to study the possibility of CO2 injection as a potential recovery
method. Dulang was chosen as the candidate because of the
complete suite of information on this field and the availability
of CO2 source within Dulang and nearby fields. The work
focused on characterizing the oil and oil - CO2 interactions
that was performed through phase behavior studies,
vaporization test and displacement tests.
Studies conducted indicates that at the reservoir
temperature of 215OF, CO2 injection would not be able to
achieve miscibility with the crude oil at the current reservoir
pressure, or even if the pressure is increased to the initial
reservoir pressure. Equation-of-State (EOS) model also shows
that the Multiple Contact Miscibility Pressure (MCMP) for
CO2 and produced hydrocarbon gas is 3230 psig and 3340
psig respectively. This pressure is significantly higher than the
initial reservoir pressure of 1800 psig.
Vaporization of Dulang crude by pure CO2 and the CO2rich produced gas was studied. The laboratory study suggests
significant vaporization of 15% of the stock tank oil with pure
CO2. However, based on Equation of State, the vaporization
ranges from 2 - 5 % with produced gas at operating reservoir
pressure of 1400 - 1800 psig.
In view of the above, the potential recovery process is an
immiscible process using produced gas containing high CO2
for cost optimization. In addition, the water alternating gas
(WAG) process may improve mobility control and sweep
efficiency. Detail studies involving WAG Composite Core, G
& G Modeling and Numerical Simulation are currently ongoing for identified location of a pilot project.
Introduction
Among the Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) techniques
applicable to Malaysian reservoirs, CO2 injection has been
identified as the most amenable process. Preliminary
laboratory studies were conducted on the applicability of CO2
displacement process.
It is estimated that potentially, about 1 billion barrel
additional crude oil could be recovered from Malaysian
producing oil fields through application of IOR/EOR (Fig. 1).
Such a gain will result in reserves growth, and extend the
producing life of these reservoirs. This potential for oil
recovery presents a major economic opportunity.
Dulang Field was selected for detailed study to assess the
potential of CO2 gas injection for oil producing fields in
Malaysia. The field is located 130 km from offshore
Terengganu, eastern Peninsular Malaysia in water depth of
76m in South China Sea 1,2 (Fig. 2).
CO2 immiscible displacement is a well established
technique for increasing oil recovery. This has been applied to
reservoirs throughout the world. In Malaysia, for the Dulang
reservoir, a more determined effort to implement a separator
gas which contains almost 50% of CO2 reinjection scheme in
an immiscible mode on a pilot scale is currently being
considered.
Carbon Dioxide Flooding
Carbon dioxide flooding may be implemented in miscible,
near miscible or immiscible modes in either a post-water
flooded (tertiary) or as secondary displacement scheme.
The recovery of oil by carbon dioxide flooding is highly
dependent on the phase behaviour between carbon dioxide,
water and reservoir oil. The CO2-oil phase behaviour strongly
affects fluid flow by altering mobility ratios, interfacial
tensions, relative permeabilities and rates of mass transfer.
Detailed phase behaviour studies can better define the
significant incremental benefits of CO2 displacement even at
immiscible conditions and when significant solution gas is
present. Viscosity reduction by CO2 helps to improve the
mobility ratio and hence volumetric conformance, while CO2
swelling reduces the effective residual oil saturation.
ZAHIDAH MD. ZAIN, NOR IDAH KECHUT, GANESAN NADESON, NORAINI AHMAD, DR. DM ANWAR RAJA
S E P. G A S
(M O L%)
CO2
N2
S E P. O IL
(M O L%)
WELLSTREAM
(M O L%)
4 9 .9 3 0
0.196
2 0 .7 4 3
0.130
0.094
0.109
C1
3 4 .8 0 0
1.168
15.062
C2
5.880
0 .9 8 4
3 .007
C3
4 .710
1 .3 0 1
2 .7 1 0
iC4
1 .7 2 0
0 .5 4 8
1.032
nC 4
1 .4 1 0
0 .4 6 3
0 .8 5 4
iC5
0 .7 1 0
0 .2 0 8
0 .4 1 5
nC 5
0 .5 0 0
0.130
0 .2 8 3
C6
0 .2 1 0
4.823
2 .9 1 7
C7
0.000
4.827
2.833
C8
0.000
2.189
1 .2 8 5
C9
0.000
4 .209
2 .4 7 0
C10
0.000
4 .016
2.357
C11+
0.000
7 4 .8 4 4
4 3 .9 2 3
TOTAL
100.000
100.000
100.000
SPE 72106
SPE 72106
LIBERATED GASES
(MOLE %)
AT 1525 PSIG, 215 OF
STOCK TANK
OIL@ 0 PSIG, 60 OF
CO2
87.240
0.000
N2
1.340
0.000
C1
8.470
0.000
C2
1.220
0.000
C3
0.830
0.000
i-C4
0.290
0.000
n-C4
0.270
0.000
i-C5
0.170
0.000
n-C5
0.110
0.004
C6
0.060
1.864
C7
0.000
7.713
C8
0.000
5.997
C9
0.000
3.675
C10
0.000
4.679
C11+
0.000
76.068
TOTAL
100.000
100.000
SG
1.431
0.836
MW
41.440
189.850
Vapourisation studies
One of the most important characteristics favouring CO2 is its
ability to vaporise or extract hydrocarbons from crude oil or
reservoir oil, thus improving sweep efficiency as well as oil
recovery. In addition, the high solubility of CO2 in crude oil
makes it an attractive immiscible flooding prospect. Menzie
and Nielson3 determined that crude oil could be produced
successfully by a process of vaporisation using CO2. They
found that over half of the original stock tank oil could be
vapourised during multiple contacts with CO2.
Holm and Josendal4 reported that CO2 vapourised or
extracted hydrocarbons from the reservoir oil until a sufficient
quantity of these hydrocarbons exists at the displacement front
to cause the oil to be miscibly displaced. When miscibility
does not exist, the vaporisation or extraction mechanism again
occurs to reestablish miscibility.
The objective of this study was to determine if Dulang B
crude oil could be significantly extracted by a process of crude
oil vaporisation using carbon dioxide. Laboratory experiments
were conducted to evaluate the amount of oil that could be
produced by CO2 injection. At the same time, the laboratory
vaporisation test provides information for calibrating the
equation of state used for economic and technical feasibility
study. A numerical model for vapourisation may be composed
from the results obtained from the laboratory studies.
ZAHIDAH MD. ZAIN, NOR IDAH KECHUT, GANESAN NADESON, NORAINI AHMAD, DR. DM ANWAR RAJA
SPE 72106
SPE 72106
Injected
solvent
Initial Vol. @
S td. C o n d .
(c c )
Final Vol. @
S td. C o n d .
(c c )
%
Vapourisation
E xperiment
1800
C O2
105.19
89.26
15.14
Simulation
1800
C O2
104.34
90.85
12.93
Simulation
1400
C O2
99.49
90.05
9.49
Simulation
1800
Produced
gas
104.34
98.99
5.13
Simulation
1400
Produced
gas
99.49
9 7 .4 5
2.05
x 100 %
ZAHIDAH MD. ZAIN, NOR IDAH KECHUT, GANESAN NADESON, NORAINI AHMAD, DR. DM ANWAR RAJA
References
1.
Experimental MMP
2875
3230
MMP by published
correlations, psig
Cronquist
2978
2509
3413
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Conclusions
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the management of
PETRONAS, PCSB and PRSS for their support and
encouragement on this project and also for permission to
publish this work. The efforts of technicians (Mohd Zaimin
Kordi, Sunmugaraja, Abd Hadi Ismail and Tajuddin Abdullah)
who contributed their expertise in conducting various
laboratory analyses are also appreciated. Special thanks are
due to Dr. Ashok Singhal of PRI, Canada and Dr. Phillip
Sigmund of BRTR Petroleum Consultant, Canada for their
advice and guidance in data analysis and interpretation.
SPE 72106
13.
64%
36%
Produced: 4.1
10% Recovery will ADD
some 1 billion barrels of
potential crude oil
Reserves: 2.5
RECOVERABLE (6.6)
DAMAR
BINTANG
Kota
Bahru
Kuala
Terengganu
LAWIT
SEPAT
NORING
INAS
BEDONG
KUDA
BUJANG
TUJOH
TANGGA
BARATTANGGA
KAPAL MERANTI DULANG
SEMANGKOK
TIMOR
RESAK
SEMANGKOK
BERANANG
KETUMBAR
130 km
Kerteh
LEGEND
DEVT./PROD. AREA
OIL FIELDS
GAS FIELDS
Kuantan
4250
4000
3500
SPE 72106
3210
3000
2570
2500
2015
2000
12.36%
1500
1525
1000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
ZAHIDAH MD. ZAIN, NOR IDAH KECHUT, GANESAN NADESON, NORAINI AHMAD, DR. DM ANWAR RAJA
5500
5000
PRESSURE (PSIA)
4500
4000
S IN G L E P H A S E R E G IO N
3500
3000
% liquid volume
2500
T W O P H A S E R E G IO N
100%
2000
Initial pressure
80%
1500
Current pressure
60%
1000
40%
500
0
0
20
40
10
30
60
50
80
70
100
90
MOL % CO2
2.50
S w e llin g f a c t o r = V o l. o f liq u id @ P ,T
m ix
b , u id @ P , T m ixtu r e
S w e l lSiantgu rfaat ci ot on rv=o luVmo el. @
o f Pliq
v ir
S a t u r a t io n vo l u m e @ P b , virgin c r u d e
2.00
S F = 1 . 5 @ P s a t = 3 2 1 0 p s ig
SWELLING FACTOR
S F = 1 . 0 9 @ P in itia l
1.50
S F = 1 .05 @ P current
1.00
0.50
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
PRESSURE, PSIG
5000
SPE 72106
V1
liquid
remove
vapour some
vapour
phase
add CO2
V2 > V1
V1
liquid
vapour
liquid
vapour
add CO2
V3 < V2
repeat
process
as in 3
liquid
V4 < V3
150
Swelling ~
10% O O IP
140
130
Reduction in oil
volume due to
vapourisation ~
15% S T O O IP
120
110
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
25
Mole %
SPE 72106
Contact 2
Contact 7
20
Contact 8
15
Contact 9
10
Contact 17
Contact 10
Contact 23
5
0
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7+
Components
Fig. 8: Compositional data of Hydrocarbon Gas at Standard Conditions
ZAHIDAH MD. ZAIN, NOR IDAH KECHUT, GANESAN NADESON, NORAINI AHMAD, DR. DM ANWAR RAJA
50
C5
C6
40
C7
Mole %
C8
C9
30
20
C10
C11
C12
C13
C13
C15
10
C16
C17
1 -10
11 - 19
20
Contact Number
100
% RECOVERY
10
miscible region
immiscible region
90
80
70
M M P ~ 2 8 7 5 P S IG
60
1500
2000
1750
2500
2250
3000
2750
3500
3250
4000
3750
PRESSURE (PSIG)
Fig. 10: Minimum Miscibility Pressure (MMP) between Dulang B and CO2 at 215 OF
SPE 72106