Professional Documents
Culture Documents
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 1
CHAPTER 17
TABLE OF CONTENTS
RAILROAD BRIDGES
NOTATION
17.0
INTRODUCTION
17.1
17.2
CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
17.2.1 Advantages
17.2.2 Standard Designs
17.2.3 Train Operations
17.2.4 Construction Methods
17.2.5 Substructures
17.3
17.4
17.5
CASE
17.5.1
17.5.2
17.5.3
17.5.4
17.5.5
17.5.6
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 2
CHAPTER 17
TABLE OF CONTENTS
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.6
CASE
17.6.1
17.6.2
17.6.3
17.6.4
17.7
DESIGN EXAMPLEDOUBLE-CELL BOX BEAM, SINGLE SPAN, NONCOMPOSITE, DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AREMA SPECIFICATIONS
17.7.1 Background
17.7.2 Introduction
17.7.2.1 Geometrics
17.7.2.2 Sign Convention
17.7.2.3 Level of Accuracy
17.7.3 Material Properties
17.7.3.1 Concrete
17.7.3.2 Pretensioning Strands
17.7.3.3 Reinforcing Bars
17.7.4 Cross-Section Properties for a Single Beam
17.7.5 Shear Forces and Bending Moments
17.7.5.1 Shear Forces and Bending Moments Due to Dead Load
17.7.5.2 Shear Forces and Bending Moments Due to Superimposed Dead Load
17.7.5.3 Shear Forces and Bending Moments Due to Live Loads
17.7.5.4 Load Combinations
17.7.6 Permissible Stresses in Concrete at Service Loads
17.7.7 Estimate Required Prestressing Force
17.7.8 Determine Prestress Losses
17.7.8.1 Prestress Losses at Service Loads
17.7.8.1.1 Elastic Shortening of Concrete
17.7.8.1.2 Creep of Concrete
17.7.8.1.3 Shrinkage of Concrete
17.7.8.1.4 Relaxation of Prestressing Steel
17.7.8.1.5 Total Losses at Service Loads
17.7.8.2 Prestress Losses at Transfer
17.7.9 Concrete Stresses
17.7.9.1 Stresses at Transfer at Midspan
17.7.9.2 Stresses at Transfer at End
17.7.9.3 Stresses at Service Load at Midspan
17.7.9.4 Stresses at Service Load at End
17.7.10 Flexural Strength
17.7.10.1 Stresses in Strands at Flexural Strength
17.7.10.2 Limits for Reinforcement
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 3
CHAPTER 17
TABLE OF CONTENTS
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.7.10.3 Design Moment Strength
17.7.10.4 Minimum Reinforcement
17.7.10.5 Final Strand Pattern
17.7.11 Shear Design
17.7.11.1 Required Shear Strength
17.7.11.2 Shear Strength Provided by Concrete
17.7.11.2.1 Simplified Approach
17.7.11.2.2 Calculate Vci
17.7.11.2.3 Calculate Vcw
17.7.11.2.4 Calculate Vc
17.7.11.3 Calculate Vs and Shear Reinforcement
17.7.11.3.1 Calculate Vs
17.7.11.3.2 Determine Stirrup Spacing
17.7.11.3.3 Check Vs Limit
17.7.11.3.4 Check Stirrup Spacing Limits
17.7.12 Deflections
17.7.12.1 Camber Due to Prestressing at Transfer
17.7.12.2 Deflection Due to Beam Self-Weight at Transfer
17.7.12.3 Deflection Due to Superimposed Dead Load
17.7.12.4 Long-Term Deflection
17.7.12.5 Deflection Due to Live Load
17.8
REFERENCES
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 5
CHAPTER 17
NOTATION
RAILROAD BRIDGES
A
Ac
Aps
Aps
Av
Avh
a
B
b
be
bv
bw
CF
D
DF
d
E
Ec
Eci
Es
Es
EQ
e
ec
F
fb
f c
fcds
f ci
fcr
fd
flc
fle
flr
fls
fpc
fpe
fps
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 6
CHAPTER 17
NOTATION
RAILROAD BRIDGES
fpu
fse
ft
ftc
fy
h
hc
I
I
ICE
Ic
L
L
LF
M
Mcr
MD
Md
Mg
MLL+I
Mmax
Mn
MSDL
Mu
Mx
n
OF
Peff
Pse
Psi
R
Sb
Sbc
St
Stc
Stg
SF
s
V
Vc
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 7
CHAPTER 17
NOTATION
RAILROAD BRIDGES
Vci
Vcw
VD
Vd
Vg
Vi
VLL+I
Vp
Vs
VSDL
Vu
Vx
vdh
W
WL
w
wc
wequ
x
yb
ybc
ybs
yt
ytc
ytg
D
f
rp
y
= nominal shear strength provided by concrete when diagonal cracking results from
combined shear and moment
= nominal shear strength provided by concrete when diagonal cracking results from
excessive principal tensile stress in web
= unfactored shear force at section due to total dead load
= unfactored shear force due to composite beam dead load
= unfactored shear force due to precast beam self-weight
= factored shear force at section due to externally applied loads occurring simultaneously
with Mmax
= unfactored shear force at section due to live load plus impact
= component of pretensioning force in the direction of the applied shear
= nominal shear strength provided by shear reinforcement
= unfactored shear force due to superimposed dead loads
= factored shear force at the section
= shear force at a distance x from the support
= horizontal shear stress
= wind load on structure
= wind load on live load
= weight per foot
= unit weight of concrete
= equivalent uniform load
= distance from the support
= distance from centroid to extreme bottom fiber of the non-composite precast beam
= distance from the centroid of the composite section to extreme bottom fiber of the
precast beam
= distance from the center of gravity of strands to the bottom fiber of the beam
= distance from centroid to extreme top fiber of the non-composite precast beam
= distance from the centroid of the composite section to the extreme top fiber of the
slab
= distance from the centroid of the composite section to extreme top fiber of the
precast beam
= deflection
= strength reduction factor
= ratio of pretensioning reinforcement
= angle of harped pretensioned reinforcement
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 9
CHAPTER 17
Railroad Bridges
17.0
INTRODUCTION
Precast concrete is playing an increasingly important role in railroad bridge structures. The economy, durability and speed of construction make precast concrete the
material of choice for new and replacement railroad bridges. The focus of this chapter is
on the specific requirements and guidelines for railroad bridges. Typical products and
details, construction considerations, and identification of applicable AREMA
(American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association, formerly
AREA) provisions are also discussed. Two case studies and a railroad superstructure
design example are presented.
17.1
TYPICAL PRODUCTS
AND DETAILS
A wide variety of precast products is used for railroad bridge construction. From the
ground up, these include concrete piles, pile caps, abutments and superstructure beams.
Over the years, many railroads have developed standards for precast concrete, including
concrete mixes, member design, member detailing and quality control.
17.1.1
Piles
Several railroads use precast, prestressed concrete piles, but their use may be limited by the
capacity of track-mounted pile drivers. Concrete piles are preferred for use in marine environments. In highly corrosive locations, precast concrete pile extensions are spliced to steel
pipe piles. This permits the embedment of the steel into the anaerobic soil zone and provides a more durable prestressed concrete pile in the more corrosive environment.
17.1.2
Pile Caps and Abutments
Precast concrete pile caps are widely used throughout the country. Typically, these are
fabricated with an embedded plate running along the bottom of the cap. This allows
welding of steel piles to the bottom of the cap. Concrete pile caps are sometimes used
to support steel or timber beams, as well as concrete beams. Some railroads are now
beginning to use precast concrete caps with precast concrete piles. The caps are cast
with a socket for the pile to fit into. Grouting is used to tie the components together after installation. Bridge abutments can also be prefabricated. The bases of these
abutments are similar to the pile caps and serve the same function of supporting the
superstructure. Abutment backwalls and wingwalls can be precast in sections and
bolted or welded together in the field.
17.1.3
Superstructures
Railroads use a wide variety of superstructure elements. Spans typically range from
12 ft to over 80 ft. Since many precast concrete spans are installed to replace timber
trestles, standard span lengths for a given railroad are frequently multiples of their
standard timber stringer span lengths (typically 14 to 16 ft). For spans of 12 ft to 20
ft, precast slab beams are frequently used. For spans in the 20- to 30-ft range, precast,
prestressed concrete box beams are the most common although tee-beams and Ibeams are occasionally used. For spans over 30 ft, box beams are dominant. Spans up
to 50 ft typically use two box beams per track. Generally, these are double celled with
through-voids. Through-voids allow fabricators to use removable and reusable void
forms in casting the beams. This helps reduce costs. Spans over 50 ft generally use
four single-void box beams per track. The shift from two beams per track on shorter
spans to four on longer spans is dictated by the lifting restrictions associated with the
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 10
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.1.3 Superstructures/17.1.3.2 Other Products
heavier weight of the longer beams. Shear keys and transverse post-tensioned steel tie
rods are frequently used to tie the box beams together with diaphragms provided at
the location of the tie rods. For spans greater than 70 to 80 ft, beams with composite cast-in-place concrete decks are frequently used.
17.1.3.1
Slab Beams and Box Beams
A variety of shapes with depth and width variations are available throughout the
country. Designers should contact the manufacturers and the specific railroad to
determine the properties and dimensions of products available for a proposed project. Typical superstructure shapes and span ranges applicable to railroad bridges are
shown in Figure 17.1.3.1-1.
Figure 17.1.3.1-1
Typical Precast Concrete
Superstructure Shapes
7'-0"
Varies from
1'-2" to 1'-8"
Slab Beam
Spans 12' to 20'
3'-6"
7'-0"
Varies
from
2'-6"
to
4'-0"
Varies
from
2'-6"
to
7'-0"
Single Cell Box
Spans 20' to 80'
17.1.3.2
Other Products
There are a few other precast products used for different span ranges. Brief descriptions of these products are given in Figures 17.1.3.2-1 through 17.1.3.2-4.
Figure 17.1.3.2-1
Tee Beam
(Intermediate and Long Spans)
Tee Beam
(Intermediate
Span)
Super Tee
(Long Span)
Precast Cap
Steel Piling
w/Welded Plate
Connection to
Pile Cap
The solid single tee beam is used for spans of 20 to 34 ft, and the voided super tee
for spans up to 55 ft in length. Both beams are set on a precast concrete cap that has
a welded plate connection to the piles as needed.
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 11
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.1.3.2 Other Products
Figure 17.1.3.2-2
Box Beam
(Intermediate Spans)
Optional
Curb
Closed Ended
Voided
Box Beam
Open Ended
Voided
Box Beam
Precast Cap
Steel Piling
w/Welded Plate
Connection to
Pile Cap
24" Octagonal
Prestressed Piling
w/C.I.P. Cap
Voided box beams are used on 20- to 50-ft long spans, with optional diaphragms and
curbs. Boxes may be set on precast or cast-in-place concrete caps with piling.
Figure 17.1.3.2-3
Low Profile Slab
(Short Spans)
Optional
Curb
Concrete
Keeper
Low Profile
Slabs
Steel
Keeper
Precast Cap
Steel Piling
w/Welded Plate
Connection to
Pile Cap
Timber
Piling
Short span bridges up to 24 ft in length with limited headroom require the use of low
profile slabs. These slabs may be set on precast caps that are either prestressed or
non-prestressed.
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 12
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.1.3.2 Other Products/17.1.3.3 Connection Details
Figure 17.1.3.2-4
Ballast Deck
(With Steel Beams)
Integral Walkway
Precast Cap
Steel Piling
w/Welded Plate
Connection to
Pile Cap
Precast, prestressed concrete deck slabs are used in a variety of lengths and widths;
with new or existing steel beams. These slabs can be cast with single and double ballast curbs and with integral walkways to further speed up construction of the bridge.
17.1.3.3
Connection Details
Figure 17.1.3.3-1
Steel Tee between Box Beams
Structural steel tees or plates are frequently used to cover the longitudinal joint in slab
beams and double-cell box beams as shown in Figure 17.1.3.3-1. Transverse posttensioned steel tie rods, as shown in Figure 17.1.3.3-2, are generally provided in
multiple single-cell box beam superstructures to help the group act as a unit.
Concrete or structural steel keepers or retainers are usually provided at the ends of
the caps to limit lateral movement, as shown in Figure 17.1.3.3-3. Designers should
contact the specific railroad to determine their standards and preferred connection
details.
Steel Tee
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 13
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.1.3.3 Connection Details /17.2.1 Advantages
Figure 17.1.3.3-2
Post-Tensioned Steel Tie Rod
Post-Tensioned
Steel Tie Rod
Diaphragm
Bearing
Plate
Figure 17.1.3.3-3
Concrete and Steel
Keeper Details
Concrete
Keeper
Steel
Keeper
Pile Cap
17.2
CONSTRUCTION
CONSIDERATIONS
17.2.1
Advantages
Precast concrete offers many advantages in the construction of railroad bridges. These
include:
Speed of constructionPrecast concrete structures can usually be constructed
faster than bridges comprised of alternative materials.
Fabrication timeIn addition to saving construction time, the lead time for
fabricating elements is shorter than for competing materials such as steel.
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 14
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.2.1 Advantages/17.2.5 Substructures
DurabilityCompared with many older structures that require frequent inspections and maintenance, railroad engineers find the low maintenance requirements
of precast concrete attractive. Use of concrete with low permeability and strict
quality control in the casting plant help assure durable bridge components.
QualityThe higher quality control of workmanship and materials available in
casting plants compared to cast-in-place construction is another plus. Railroads can
work with precast suppliers to ensure that members are cast to their satisfaction.
Site constraintsThe remote locations of many railroad bridges make the precast aspect of precast construction very useful. When the nearest ready-mix
plant is many miles away from the site, cast-in-place construction within a railroads time constraints is virtually impossible.
Emergency responsePrecast concrete bridge elements provide components
for rapid repair of bridges as a result of damage caused by derailments or timber trestle fires. Several railroads keep entire precast bridges stockpiled for rapid
emergency replacement. Concrete bridges are less vulnerable to damage from
fire compared to steel or timber bridges.
17.2.2
Standard Designs
Most railroads have standard precast concrete trestle bridge designs that incorporate repetition of modular precast units. These standard designs are used for replacement of
existing bridges, as well as construction of new bridges. Railroads and contractors familiar with railroad bridge construction have developed low-cost methods of trestle bridge
construction. These methods minimize the time that railroad operations must be suspended. In addition, precast concrete bridge components are often shipped by rail,
which, in many cases, is the only way to deliver components to remote locations.
17.2.3
Train Operations
17.2.4
Construction Methods
The various methods used to construct railroad bridges to support existing trackage
while minimizing disruptions to train operations include the following:
rolling spans on runways
floating spans on barges
pick and set
temporary rail line change
permanent rail line change
trestle bridge construction
These methods are utilized because train operations cannot be suspended for the
amount of time that would be required to construct the new bridge piece by piece in
its permanent location.
17.2.5
Substructures
In many bridges, the existing substructure is reused and, if necessary, modified for
replacement of the superstructure. Sometimes, the bridge may require new substructure elements. In both cases, the substructure work is performed beneath the existing
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 15
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.2.5 Substructures
track and superstructure so that the track is out of service for only very limited periods while driving piles or placing temporary supports. For replacement of existing
bridges utilizing this method, ballast removal, as well as relocating the decks and
beams of the existing bridge, may be required to allow pile driving for the new bridge.
It is often necessary to reduce the speed of traffic over existing bridges during construction due to reduced load carrying capacity resulting from relocating the decks
and beams.
Precast concrete beams are usually installed using pick and set methods. This method
requires access to the bridge construction site for cranes that have adequate capacity to
lift the beams. A typical bridge replacement procedure is illustrated in Figure 17.2.5-1.
Figure 17.2.5-1
Typical Bridge Replacement
Construction Sequence
REMOVE EXISTING
SUPERSTRUCTURE
RECONNECT TRACK
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 16
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.3 The American Railway Engineering And Maintenance-of-Way
Association Load Provisions/17.3.2.1 Live Load
17.3
THE AMERICAN
RAILWAY ENGINEERING
AND MAINTENANCEOF-WAY ASSOCIATION
LOAD PROVISIONS
This section briefly discusses the types of loads on railroad bridges. The emphasis is
on those loads that are different from highway bridge loads covered in Chapter 7.
Provisions of the American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way
Association (AREMA) Manual for Railway Engineering are introduced relative to
design loads and load combinations. In addition, applicable portions of the manual
are referenced.
17.3.1
AREMA Manual
The AREMA Manual provides the recommended practice for railroads and others concerned with the engineering, design and construction of railroad fixed properties, allied
services and facilities. Prior to starting the design of a project, design engineers should
discuss specific loadings, forces, standards and procedures with the appropriate railroad.
17.3.2
AREMA Loads
17.3.2.1
Live Load
= Dead Load
= Live Load
= Impact
= Centrifugal Force
= Earth Pressure
= Buoyancy
= Wind Load on Structure
= Wind Load on Live Load
= Longitudinal Force from Live Load
Design engineers familiar with highway bridge design will recognize the loads and
forces listed above. The magnitude of the loads and forces are explained in detail in
the AREMA Manual. Loads that are different from highway bridges are described in
the following sections.
52,000
52,000
52,000
52,000
80,000
80,000
80,000
80,000
40,000
52,000
52,000
52,000
52,000
80,000
80,000
80,000
80,000
Figure 17.3.2.1-1
Cooper E 80 Load
40,000
8,000 lb per
lin ft
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 17
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.3.2.1 Live Load
(4) For members receiving load from more than one track, the design live load on the
tracks shall be as follows:
For two tracks, full live load on two tracks
For three tracks, full live load on two tracks and one-half on the other track
For four tracks, full live load on two tracks, one-half on one track, and onequarter on the remaining track
For more than four tracks, as specified by the Engineer
The selection of the tracks for these loads shall be that which produces the most critical
design condition in the member being designed.
Table 17.3.2.1-1
Maximum Bending Moments, Shear Forces and Pier Reactions for Cooper E 80 Live Load (Based on AREMA Manual Table 1-17)
All values are for one rail (one-half track load)
Span
Length
ft
Maximum
Bending
Moment
ft-kips
Maximum
Bending
Moment at
Quarter Point
ft-kips
End
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
18
20
24
28
32
36
40
45
50
55
60
70
80
90
100
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
93.89
112.50
131.36
160.00
190.00
220.00
280.00
340.00
412.50
570.42
730.98
910.85
1,097.30
1,311.30
1,601.20
1,901.80
2,233.10
2,597.80
3,415.00
4,318.90
5,339.10
6,446.30
37.50
45.00
55.00
70.00
85.00
100.00
115.00
130.00
145.00
165.00
210.00
255.00
300.00
420.00
555.00
692.50
851.50
1,010.50
1,233.60
1,473.00
1,732.30
2,010.00
2,608.20
3,298.00
4,158.00
5,060.50
40.00
46.67
51.43
55.00
57.58
60.00
65.45
70.00
73.84
77.14
85.00
93.33
100.00
110.83
120.86
131.44
141.12
150.80
163.38
174.40
185.31
196.00
221.04
248.40
274.46
300.00
Midspan
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
21.82
23.33
24.61
25.71
27.50
28.89
28.70(1)
31.75
34.29
37.50
41.10
44.00
45.90
49.73
52.74
55.69
61.45
67.41
73.48
78.72
Maximum
Pier
Reaction
kips
40.00
53.33
62.86
70.00
75.76
80.00
87.28
93.33
98.46
104.29
113.74
121.33
131.10
147.92
164.58
181.94
199.06
215.90
237.25
257.52
280.67
306.42
354.08
397.70
437.15
474.24
(1) AREMA table does not include a value for Cooper E 80 live load. A value of 28.70 kips is provided for alternative live load.
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 18
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.3.2.2 Impact Load/17.3.2.4 Load Combinations
17.3.2.2
Impact Load
For reinforced concrete (precast and cast-in-place), the impact load is a percentage of
the live load based on the ratio of live load to live load plus dead load:
100L
[AREMA Eq. 2-1]
L +D
The impact load shall not exceed 60% for diesel engines and 80% for steam engines.
I=
For prestressed concrete, the impact load is a percentage of the live load based on
span length in ft:
L 60 ft,
I = 35 - L2/500
[AREMA Eq. 17-1]
60 < L 135 ft, I = 14 + 800/(L - 2)
L > 135 ft,
I = 20%
where L = span length of member in ft
17.3.2.3
Other Loads
All other loads and forces are defined similarly to highway bridges although the magnitudes are different. The design engineer should refer to the AREMA Manual for
additional information.
17.3.2.4
Load Combinations
The various combinations of loads and forces to which a structure may be subjected are
grouped in a similar manner as highway bridges. Each component of the structure or foundation upon which it rests, shall be proportioned for the group of loads that produces the
most critical design condition. The group loading combinations for service load design and
load factor design are as shown in Table 17.3.2.4-1 and Table 17.3.2.4-2, respectively, and
are reproduced from AREMA Article 2.2.4.
Table 17.3.2.4-1
Group Loading Combinations
Service Load Design
Table 17.3.2.4-2
Group Loading Combinations
Load Factor Design
Group
Item
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
D + L + I + CF + E + B + SF
D + E + B + SF + W
Group I + 0.5W + WL + LF + F
Group I + OF
Group II + OF
Group III + OF
D + E + B + SF + EQ
Group I + ICE
Group II + ICE
Allowable
Percentage of
Basic Unit Stress
100
125
125
125
140
140
133
140
150
Group
Item
I
IA
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 19
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.4 Current Design Practice/17.4.3 Simple Span Bridges
17.4
CURRENT DESIGN
PRACTICE
17.4.1
New Bridges
New railroad bridges are constructed to support railroad tracks over existing waterways, roadways, and other railroads. In addition, new railroad bridges are built to
replace existing bridges due to:
unsatisfactory capacity to support current or future loadings
unsafe condition resulting from deterioration and/or poor maintenance
damage as a result of an accident or natural disaster
inadequate waterway opening
highway or railroad grade separation projects
navigation, drainage and flood control projects
17.4.2
Replacement Bridges
The large majority of railroad bridge projects usually involve existing trackage.
Consequently, one of the most important considerations for the railroad bridge
designer is to design the bridge such that construction will have minimal disruption
to train operations. This affects design details, construction methods and project
costs. Much of todays rail traffic is under contract with the customer and the contract often includes a guarantee of service between origin and destination. Penalties
and possible loss of a contract can result if unreasonable delays in the agreed upon
schedule are experienced. Taking a track out of service or reducing the speed of rail
traffic for an extended period of time for bridge construction can have a detrimental
economic effect on the railroad. The project must be properly planned and coordinated with the operating and marketing departments of the railroad during the
design and construction phases.
The use of standardized precast components speeds both the design and construction
of bridges. Replacement spans can be specified by length alone, and railroad bridge
workers are familiar with the sections and construction procedures. Since the vast
majority of precast concrete bridges have all the superstructure below track level, vertical and horizontal clearance is not limited by these structures. This allows wide
cargo or double stack containers to be shipped without clearance concerns and
reduces the threat of bridge damage caused by shifted loads.
17.4.3
Simple Span Bridges
Many railroads prefer simple span bridges to continuous structures, finding them easier to install and maintain. Since they are structurally determinate, simple spans are
better able to handle problems such as support settlement and thermal effects than
some continuous bridges. Precast concrete elements are particularly suited to simplespan construction. Additional reasons many railroads prefer simply supported bridges
to continuous span bridges include the following:
If repair or replacement of superstructure elements is necessary, less interruption to train traffic is incurred with a simple span bridge than with a continuous span bridge.
Installation of simple spans can be accomplished more quickly than continuous
spans.
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 20
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.4.3 Simple Span Bridges/17.5.3 New Intermediate Piers
It is desirable to limit the end skew of railroad bridge precast beams to less than 30
degrees for constructibility and placement of reinforcing steel in the beam. When the
bridge skew relative to the substructure exceeds 30 degrees, staggered precast elements as shown in Figure 17.4.4-1 should be considered.
Figure 17.4.4-1
Layouts for Skewed Bridges
Skew 30
Skew > 30
17.5
CASE STUDY NO. 1
TRUSS BRIDGE
REPLACEMENT
17.5.1
Existing Bridge
This case study describes a Southern Pacific railroad truss bridge replacement
(Marianos, 1991). This project illustrates the use of precast concrete elements to
replace a structure without serious interruption to rail traffic. The existing structure
consisted of a 90-ft long timber trestle approach, two 154-ft long through-truss spans
and a 30-ft long plate-girder approach span.
The truss spans were nearly 90 years old and were at the end of their useful service
lives due to joint wear. Since the truss spans required replacement, the railroad decided to replace the entire bridge with precast concrete.
17.5.2
New Piles
Using a track-mounted pile driver, steel H-piles were driven through the track on the
timber trestle. The pile bents were spaced to give 30-ft replacement span lengths in
the trestle area. After the piles were cut off at the required elevation, precast concrete
bent caps were placed and the piles welded to steel plates embedded in the bottom of
the caps.
17.5.3
New Intermediate Piers
Since the truss spans crossed a creek subject to high flood flows, it was essential to
minimize obstruction of the waterway. For this reason, new intermediate piers with
four 79-ft long precast, prestressed box beams replaced the two 154-ft long truss
spans. The 79-ft long beams were beyond the span range of the railroad standards
and required a new design.
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 21
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.5.3 New Intermediate Piers/17.5.5 Truss Removal
Railroad crews built intermediate piers at midspan of each truss by driving piles
through the existing truss floor systems, and the 79-ft long box beams were ordered
and fabricated.
17.5.4
New Superstructure for
Approach Spans
When the substructure was completed, superstructure replacement began. The 90-ft
long timber trestle was replaced by 30-ft long spans of precast, prestressed box beams,
as shown in Figure 17.5.4-1. Two box beams placed side by side were used for each
span. Each box beam has two through-voids and an integral ballast retaining sidewall
and walkway cast on the outside edge. A shear key between the box beams helped
ensure load distribution between the two beams. The box beams were placed using a
track-mounted crane.
A similar 30-ft long box beam span was used to replace the steel plate-girder span on
the approach opposite the timber trestle. Precast concrete bolster blocks were used on
top of the existing masonry piers to obtain the proper elevation because the new
structure was shallower than the existing one.
Figure 17.5.4-1
Precast 30-ft Approach Span
on Precast Bolster Blocks
17.5.5
Truss Removal
After the approach spans were completed, preparation began for replacing the truss
spans. An area under the truss spans was filled with ballast and leveled. Railroad track
panels were laid perpendicular to the bridge on the fill below the structure. Steel
frames mounted on rail trucks were placed on these tracks and used to support the
trusses for removal. With these preparations for truss replacement complete, a carefully orchestrated construction effort began.
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 22
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.5.5 Truss Removal/17.5.6 New Superstructure for Truss Spans
First, the truss ends were jacked up to lift them off the pier. The truss was then
secured to the steel frames and rolled laterally clear of the work area, as shown in
Figure 17.5.5-1. The construction crew then finished preparations on the pier top
for placing the precast, prestressed concrete box beams. This work included removing the remaining truss attachments and placing elastomeric bearing pads.
Figure 17.5.5-1
Roll-Out of Truss Span
to be Replaced
17.5.6
New Superstructure
for Truss Spans
Each 154-ft long steel truss was replaced by two spans of precast box beams. When
the pier preparation was completed, the four box beams of the first span were lifted
into position using truck cranes. While workmen epoxied the longitudinal joints and
shear keys between these beams, the box beams for the second span were being
placed. After the joints of both spans were epoxied and handrail cables strung along
the walkways, prefabricated panels of railroad track were placed on the spans. This
allowed a hopper car to be moved out on the track to dump ballast on the new spans.
After the ballast was tamped and the track reconnected, the new spans were ready for rail
traffic. Replacing a 154-ft long truss span was completed in a 12-hour track closure.
Several weeks later, the second truss span was replaced, completing the reconstruction.
The use of precast elements, as shown in Figure 17.5.6-1, allowed the speedy and
economical replacement of the structure, using the railroads own work force.
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 23
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.5.6 New Superstructure for Truss Spans/17.6.2 New Superstructure
Figure 17.5.6-1
Completed Structure
17.6
CASE STUDY NO. 2
TIMBER TRESTLE
REPLACEMENT
17.6.1
Existing Bridge
This case study discusses a timber trestle bridge replacement on the Union Pacific
Railroad system. Bridge 177.81 is located approximately 1.59 miles west of
Marysville, CA on Union Pacific Railroads Canyon Subdivision. The existing bridge,
shown in Figure 17.6.1-1, consisted of numerous timber trestle spans and a steel
plate-girder span over the Yuba River. The plate-girder was to remain in place and the
timber trestle portion of the bridge was to be replaced.
Figure 17.6.1-1
Existing Plate-Girder and
Timber Trestle Spans.
17.6.2
New Superstructure
Due to the volume of rail traffic and importance of on-time delivery by the Union
Pacific Railroad, minimal disruption to train operations was mandatory. Substructure
construction was to be performed without interference or downtime to the railroad.
Superstructure change-out would be performed during windows approved by the
railroad. A precast, prestressed concrete superstructure system was selected based on
economics, speed of erection and the ability to meet the construction constraints
associated with the need for minimal disruption to train operations.
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 24
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.6.2 New Superstructure/17.6.3 Substructure Construction
The existing timber trestle spans varied in length with an average span of slightly less
than 15 ft. Based on a field survey of the timber bent locations, new bent locations
were selected to minimize interference with existing timber pile bents and optimize
beam spans. A span length of 44 ft was selected for the new superstructure. For this
span length, 45-in. deep double-cell, prestressed concrete box beams were determined to be the most economical structural system.
17.6.3
Substructure Construction
Based on field conditions, prevalent construction practice in the area and construction constraints governed by railroad operations, cast-in-place reinforced concrete
bents were selected for the substructure. The bents consisted of 100-ft long, 4-ft
diameter drilled shafts, 4-ft diameter cast-in-place reinforced concrete column extensions and cap beams. All structural components were designed in accordance with the
AREMA Manual and Union Pacific Railroad standards and procedures.
The sequence of construction was as follows:
The existing bridge footwalk and handrail were removed as required to facilitate
drilled shaft installation. The drilled shafts were spaced at 15-ft centers perpendicular to the track to allow installation of the drilled shafts without interference to railroad operations. Continuous train operations were maintained throughout the entire
construction of the substructure. Due to foundation conditions, steel pipe casing was
necessary for drilled shaft installation. The pipe casing was installed using a vibratory hammer. Reinforcing steel cages were set and the holes were filled with 4,000 psi
compressive strength concrete. Drilled shaft column extensions, bent cap beams and
the abutment were constructed under the existing timber superstructure. Due to the
depth of the new concrete beams, the bent and abutment construction were completed without interfering with the existing timber superstructure, as shown in
Figure 17.6.3-1.
Figure 17.6.3-1
Completed Concrete Bents
under Existing Timber Trestle
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:28 PM
Page 25
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.6.4 Superstructure Construction
17.6.4
Superstructure
Construction
Working within railroad approved construction windows, the timber structure was
removed and precast beams were set. In a continuous, well-planned procedure, the
ballast, ties and rail were placed and train operations were resumed. The use of precast concrete allowed the Union Pacific Railroad to replace a timber trestle with a
stronger, more durable structural system with minimal disruption to railroad service.
The completed bridge is shown in Figure 17.6.4-1.
Figure 17.6.4-1
Completed Bridge Structure
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:37 PM
Page 1
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.7 Design ExampleDouble-Cell Box Beam, Single Span, Non-Composite, Designed
in Accordance with AREMA Specifications/17.7.2 Introduction
17.7
DESIGN EXAMPLE
DOUBLE-CELL BOX BEAM,
SINGLE SPAN, NONCOMPOSITE, DESIGNED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH
AREMA SPECIFICATIONS
17.7.1
Background
Prestressed concrete double-cell box beams and solid slab beams are commonly used
in the railroad industry. Solid slab beams are used for spans up to 20 ft, especially
when superstructure depth has to be minimized. Prestressed concrete double-cell box
beams are used for spans up to 50 ft in length. Prestressed concrete single-cell box
beams are more economical for spans longer than 40 ft and are used for span lengths
up to 80 ft. When span lengths exceed 80 ft, prestressed concrete I-beams with a
composite deck become more feasible from a design, economic and construction
point of view. This example illustrates the design of a non-composite, prestressed
concrete, double-cell box beam.
17.7.2
Introduction
In non-composite design, the beam acts as the main structural element. Therefore,
the beam has to carry all the dead loads, superimposed dead loads and live load. The
beams are assumed to be fully prestressed under service load conditions. The dead
load consists of the self-weight of the beam including diaphragms. The superimposed
dead loads consist of ballast, ties, rails, concrete curbs and handrails, as shown in
Figures 17.7.2-1 and 17.7.2-2. The live load used for this bridge is Cooper E 80,
which is described in the AREMA Manual, Chapter 8, Part 2, Reinforced Concrete
Design, Article 2.2.3. The prestressed concrete beams are designed using the AREMA
Manual, Chapter 8, Part 17, Prestressed Concrete Design Specifications for Design of
Prestressed Concrete Members. The beams in this example are checked for both serviceability and strength requirements.
Figure 17.7.2-1
Bridge Cross-Section
C
L Track & Bridge
8'-0" Min. Clear
Timber ties
Ballast
3'-10 7/8"
Precast curb
and walkway
30" Prestressed
concrete box
beam
8" Min.
1/2" Gap
7'-0"
7'-0"
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:37 PM
Page 2
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.7.2 Introduction/ 17.7.2.2 Sign Convention
Figure 17.7.2-2
Bridge Elevation
Well
compacted
granular fill
Cast-in-place
abutment CL
Abutment No.1
17.7.2.1
Geometrics
17.7.2.2
Sign Convention
Cast-in-place
abutment
CL
Abutment No.2
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:37 PM
Page 3
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.7.2.3 Level of Precision/17.7.3.2 Pretensioning Strands
17.7.2.3
Level of Precision
Item
Concrete Stress
Steel Stress
Prestress Force
Moments
Shears
For the Beam:
Cross-Section Dimensions
Section Properties
Length
Area of Prestressing Steel
Area of Mild Reinforcement
Units
ksi
ksi
kips
ft-kips
kips
in.
in.
ft
in.2
in.2
Precision
1/1000
1/10
1/10
1/10
1/10
1/100
1
1/100
1/1000
1/100
Some calculations are carried out to a higher number of significant figures than common practice with hand calculation. Depending on available computation resources
and designer preferences, other levels of precision may be used.
17.7.3
Material Properties
17.7.3.1
Concrete
where
wc = unit weight of concrete, pcf
f c = specified strength of concrete, psi
Modulus of elasticity of concrete at transfer, using f ci = 4,000 psi, is:
E ci = (150) (33) 4, 000 / 1, 000 = 3, 834 ksi
1.5
17.7.3.2
Pretensioning Strands
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:37 PM
Page 4
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.7.3.3 Reinforcing Bars/
17.7.5.1 Shear Forces and Bending Moments Due to Dead Load
17.7.3.3
Reinforcing Bars
17.7.4
Cross-Section Properties
for a Single Beam
Figure 17.7.4-1
Box Beam Cross-Section
6"
1 1/2"
2'-0" Clr.
(Typ.)
3x3"
Fillet 1'-5 1/2"
(Typ.)
#4 Stirrups
5"
2'-8 3/4"
#4 Bars
1'-5 1/2"
8 1/2"
2'-7"
6 1/2"
2'-8 3/4"
5"
7'-0"
A = area of cross-section of precast beam = 1,452 in.2
h = average depth of the precast beam = (0.5)(31 + 30) = 30.5 in.
I = moment of inertia about the centroid of the precast beam = 171,535 in.4
yb = distance from centroid to extreme bottom fiber of the precast beam = 15.25 in.
yt = distance from centroid to extreme top fiber of the precast beam = 15.25 in.
Sb = section modulus for the extreme bottom fiber of the precast beam = 11,248 in.2
St = section modulus for the extreme top fiber of the precast beam = 11,248 in.3
NOTE: Section properties do not include precast curbs and walkway. Reinforcement
in curbs and walkway not shown for clarity
17.7.5
Shear Forces and
Bending Moments
17.7.5.1
Shear Forces and Bending
Moments Due to Dead Load
Self-weight of beam =
1, 452(150)
= 1.513 kip/ft
1, 000(144)
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:37 PM
Page 5
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.7.5.1 Shear Forces and Bending Moments Due to Dead Load/
17.7.5.2 Shear Forces and Bending Moments Due to Superimposed Dead Load
The equations for shear force (Vx) and moment (Mx) for uniform loads on a simple
span (L) are given by:
L
Vx = w x
2
Mx =
(Eq. 17.7.5.1-1)
wx
(L x)
2
(Eq. 17.7.5.1-2)
where
w = weight/ft = 1.513 kip/ft
L = span length, ft
x = distance from the support, ft
Using the above equations, values of shear forces (Vg) and bending moments (Mg)
are computed and given in Table 17.7.5.1-1.
Table 17.7.5.1-1
Shear Forces and
Bending Moments
x, ft
V g , kip
Mg , ft-kips
V SDL , kip
MSDL , ft-kip
V LL+I , kip
MLL+I , kip
1.27**
20.0
4.0
15.9
6.0
12.8
0.0
26.6
75.7
104.4
20.1
0.0
18.4
24.5
14.6
69.5
164.6
0.0
150.7
194.5
0.0*
21.9
7.25
10.9
10.0
6.8
14.5
0.0
119.3
143.7
159.1
11.8
95.8
10.1
109.5
6.3
132.0
0.0
146.0
104.8
785.7
86.8
892.0
46.8
1,033.0
* At the support
** At the critical section for shear (See Section 17.7.11)
Diaphragm Load: Since distance between the centerline of the bearing and center of
gravity of the diaphragm is less than the effective depth, ignore the effect of the
diaphragm load in this example.
17.7.5.2
Shear Forces and Bending
Moments Due to
Superimposed Dead Load
Superimposed dead loads consist of ballast, ties, rails, curbs and handrails.
Ballast, including track ties at 120 pcf
= 15/12(7 + 0.04/2 gap)(0.120) = 1.053 kip/ft
Track rails, inside guardrails and fastenings at 200 plf /track =
For this example, assume concrete curb at 1.5 ft2 + handrail post at
5% = (1.5)(0.150)(1.05) = 0.236 kip/ft
Total superimposed dead load per beam per linear ft = 1.389 kip/ft
Using a uniform load of 1.389 kip/ft and Equations 17.7.5.1-1 and 17.7.5.1-2,
values of shear forces (VSDL) and bending moments (MSDL) are computed and given
in Table 17.7.5.1-1.
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:37 PM
Page 6
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.7.5.3 Shear Forces and Bending Moments Due to Live Load/
17.7.7 Estimate Required Prestressing Force
17.7.5.3
Shear Forces and Bending
Moments Due to Live Load
The actions caused by the Cooper E 80 live load can be determined by using the
tables in the AREMA Manual, Chapter 15, Art. 1.15 Appendix or by using any commercially available computer program. A distribution factor (DF) equal to 0.5 is
used, since there are two beams supporting one track.
For span lengths less than 60 ft, the impact factor is:
L2
( 29) 2
I = 35
= 35
= 33.32% of live load
500
500
[AREMA Eq.17-1]
The values of shear forces (VLL+I) and bending moments (MLL+I) for live load plus
impact for one beam were determined using a computer program and are given in
Table 17.7.5.1-1.
17.7.5.4
Load Combinations
Values of shear forces and bending moments for service load design and factored load
design are determined from Table 17.7.5.1-1 and given in Table 17.7.5.4-1.
Table 17.7.5.4-1
Shear Forces and Bending
Moments for Design
Self Wt
(g)
Dead
(SDL)
Live +
Impact
(L+I)
Total
Service
Load
Total
Factored
Load
20.0
18.4
150.7
189.1
405.4
Max. Bending
Moment at
Midspan, ft-kips
159.1
1,46.0
1,033.0
1,338.1
2,837.5
The maximum value of shear occurs near the supports while the maximum value of
bending moment occurs near midspan for a simply supported span.
17.7.6
Permissible Stresses in
Concrete at Service Loads
17.7.7
Estimate Required
Prestressing Force
M g + M SDL + M LL + I
Sb
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:37 PM
Page 7
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.7.7 Estimate Required Prestressing Force /17.7.8 Determine Prestress Losses
where
fb
= concrete stress at the bottom fiber of the beam
Mg = unfactored bending moment due to precast beam self-weight, ft-kips
MSDL = unfactored bending moment due to superimposed dead load, ft-kips
MLL+I = unfactored bending moment due to live load plus impact, ft-kips
fb =
Since allowable tensile stress in bottom fiber at service load is zero, required precompression is 1.428 ksi.
Bottom fiber stress due to prestress after all losses:
P
Pe
f b = se + se c
A
Sb
where Pse = effective pretension force after allowing for all losses
Then 1.428 =
Pse
P (12.75)
+ se
1, 452
11, 248
783.7
= 30.8 strands
(1 0.18)(0.75 )(270)( 0.153)
To determine effective prestress, fse, allowance for losses of prestress due to elastic
shortening of concrete, fle, creep of concrete, flc, shrinkage of concrete, fls, and relaxation of prestressing steel, flr, will be calculated.
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:37 PM
Page 8
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.7.8.1 Prestress Losses at Service Loads/
17.7.8.1.4 Relaxation of Prestressing Steel
17.7.8.1
Prestress Losses at
Service Loads
17.7.8.1.1
Elastic Shortening
of Concrete
f le =
Es
f cr
E ci
where
fcr = stress in concrete at centroid of prestressing reinforcement immediately after
transfer, due to total prestress force and dead load acting at time of transfer,
and is calculated as follows:
=
Psi Psie c2 M g e c
+
A
I
I
where
Psi = pretension force after allowing for initial losses. Taken as 0.69 fpu
fcr =
f le =
17.7.8.1.2
Creep of Concrete
159.1(12)(7.96)
= 0.824 + 0.442 0.089 = 1.177 ksi
171,535
28, 000
(1.177 ) = 8.6 ksi
3, 834
where
fcds = concrete stress at centroid of prestressing reinforcement, due to all dead
loads not included in calculation of fcr
=
M SDL e c 146.0(12)(7.96)
=
= 0.081 ksi
171,535
I
17 , 000 150(70)
= 6.5 ksi
1, 000
17.7.8.1.4
Relaxation of
Prestressing Steel
5, 000
- 0.10(8.6) - 0.05(6.5 + 13.6) = 3.1 ksi
1, 000
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:37 PM
Page 9
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.7.8.1.5 Total Losses at Service Loads/17.7.9.1 Stresses at Transfer at Midspan
17.7.8.1.5
Total Losses at Service Loads
17.7.8.2
Total Losses at Service Loads
17.7.9
Concrete Stresses
Stresses need to be checked at several locations along the beam to ensure that the
design satisfies permissible stresses at all locations at both transfer and service loads.
For this design example, stresses will be checked at midspan and at the ends, which
will govern straight strand designs without debonding.
17.7.9.1
Stresses at Transfer
at Midspan
Psi Psie c M g
+
A
St
St
+
1, 452
11, 248
11, 248
O.K.
Psi Psie c M g
+
A
Sb
Sb
1, 246 (1, 246)(7.96) 170.2(12)
+
1, 452
11, 248
11, 248
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:37 PM
Page 10
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.7.9.2 Stresses at Transfer at End/
17.7.10.1 Stress in Strands at Flexural Strength
17.7.9.2
Stresses at
Transfer at End
Stresses should be checked at the end of the transfer length when designing a prestressed beam (see Section 9.1.8.2 for an example of this check). However, in this
design example, a standard beam design is being checked. Therefore it is conservative to check the stresses at the very end of the member, assuming the full prestress
force is effective at that location. Since the strands are straight and all strands are
bonded for the full length of the beam, the concrete stresses at the end are simply the
stresses at midspan without the stress due to dead load moment.
f t = -0.023 ksi, which is within permissible values shown above O.K.
fb = 1.740 ksi, which is within permissible values shown above O.K.
17.7.9.3
Stresses at Service
Load at Midspan
+
A
St
St
1, 096.9 (1, 096.9)(7.96) 1, 338.1(12)
+
1, 452
11, 248
11, 248
O.K.
A
Sb
Sb
1, 096.9 (1, 096.9)(7.96) 1, 338.1(12)
+
1, 452
11, 248
11, 248
O.K.
The prestress force is at its maximum value at release and service loads do not affect
stresses at the end of the beam. Therefore, stresses at release will govern at the end of
the beam, so there is no need to check stresses at the end at service loads.
17.7.10
Flexural Strength
17.7.10.1
Stress in Strands at
Flexural Strength
f pu
f ps = f pu 1 0.5 p , provided fse is greater than 0.5 fpu
fc
where
fse = effective stress in pretensioning steel after losses
= 202.5 - 31.8 = 170.7 ksi > 0.5(270) = 135.0 ksi
O.K.
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:37 PM
Page 11
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.7.10.1 Stress in Strands at Flexural Strength/17.7.10.3 Design Moment Strength
rp =
A ps
bd
where
Aps = total area of pretensioning steel in tension zone
= 36 (0.153) = 5.508 in.2
b = effective flange width = 7(12) = 84.0 in.
d = distance from extreme compression fiber to centroid of pretensioning force
32( 2.5) + 4(15.25)
= 30.5 = 26.58 in.
36
Note: In many cases, strands near or above midheight are neglected when computing d for calculating the average stress in strands at flexural strength. This is
because, at the flexural strength, the strands located higher in the cross-section will
not reach a strain (and stress) as high as the bottom strands. However, for this standard beam design, the strands at midheight have been included as shown above. A
strain compatibility analysis (described in Sections 8.2.2.5 and 8.2.2.6) can be used
to compute the strain and stress in the strands at midheight. Such an analysis for
this beam indicates that the strands at midheight would reach a stress of approximately 251 ksi, which is reasonable when compared with the stress, fps, computed
below. The same analysis indicates that the strands in the bottom row would reach
a stress of nearly 260 ksi. Therefore, in this case, incorporating the strands at midheight has provided a reasonable result. If the strands at midheight are neglected,
the strength of the section at midspan would prove to be inadequate.
rp =
A ps
bd
5.508
= 0.00247
84( 26.58)
270
fps = 2701 (0.5)(0.00247 )
= 257.1 ksi
7.0
17.7.10.2
Limits for Reinforcement
f ps
f c
0.00247 ( 257.1)
= 0.0907 < 0.30
7.0
O.K.
When the reinforcement ratio exceeds 0.30, design moment strength shall not be
taken greater than the moment strength based on the compression portion of the
moment couple.
17.7.10.3
Design Moment Strength
f ps
fMn = f A psf psd 1 0.6 p
f c
a
= f A psf ps d
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:37 PM
Page 12
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.7.10.3Design Moment Strength/17.7.10.5 Final Strand Pattern
where
Mn = nominal moment strength of a section
f = strength reduction factor for flexure = 0.95
a
A psf ps
0.85 f c b
[AREMA Art.17.5.2]
5.508( 257.1)
= 2.83 in.
0.85(7 )(84)
[AREMA Art.17.5.4d]
2.83 1
fMn = 0.95 5.508( 257.1) 26.58
= 2,821.2 ft-kips
2 12
Factored moment due to dead and live loads from Table 17.7.5.4-1 = 2,837.5 ft-kips.
Percentage over =
17.7.10.4
Minimum Reinforcement
17.7.10.5
Final Strand Pattern
( 2, 837.5 2, 821.2)
(100) = 0.58% (insignificant) say ok.
2, 821.2
The total amount of prestressed and non-prestressed reinforcement should be adequate to develop an ultimate moment at the critical section at least 1.2 times the
cracking moment, Mcr: fMn 1.2Mcr. The calculation (not shown here but similar
to the calculation in Section 9.1.10.2) yields 2,821.2 ft-kips > 2,427.3 ft-kips O.K.
7'-0"
Figure 17.7.10.5-1
Strand Pattern
4"
3 1/2"
10"
1'-8"
1'-4"
1'-8"
10"
4"
2 1/2"
3'-3 3/4"
4 1/2"
2'-1"
1'-3 1/4"
6 Strands
2'-1"
4 Strands
Void Drains
Drip
2 1/2"
3" 17 Spaces @ 2" = 2'-10" 10" 17 Spaces @ 2" = 2'-10"
2 1/2"
3"
32 Strands
SEPT 01
10/8/01
11:43 AM
Page 13
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.7.11 Shear Design /17.7.11.2.1 Simplified Approach
17.7.11
Shear Design
17.7.11.1
Required Shear Strength
17.7.11.2
Shear Strength Provided
by Concrete
17.7.11.2.1
Simplified Approach
The shear strength provided by concrete, Vc, can be calculated by using AREMA
Manual Eq. 17-9, provided that the effective prestress force is not less than 40% of
the total tensile strength provided by the flexural reinforcement.
Vu d
Vc = 0.6 f c + 700
b wd
Mu
where
Mu = factored bending moment at the section
3
bw = total web width = 5 + 8.5 + 5 = 18.5 in.
d = 26.58 in. > 0.8h = (0.8)(30.5) = 24.4 in.
Therefore, use d = 26.58 in.
Vu d 405.4( 26.58)
=
= 1.71 > 1.0, use 1.0
525.4(12)
Mu
NO GOOD
AREMA Manual Art. 17.5.9c allows higher values of Vc if a more detailed calculation
is made. According to this method, Vc is the lesser of Vci or Vcw.
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:37 PM
Page 14
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.7.11.2.1 Simplified Approach/17.7.11.2.2 Calculate Vci
where
Vci = nominal shear strength provided by concrete when diagonal cracking
results from combined shear and moment
Vcw = nominal shear strength provided by concrete when diagonal cracking
results from excessive principal tensile stress in web
17.7.11.2.2
Calculate Vci
Vci = 0.6 f c b w d + VD +
ViM cr
M max
Mcr
= S b 6 f c + f pe f d
where
fpe= compressive stress in concrete due to effective prestress force only, at the
extreme fiber of section where tensile stress is caused by externally applied
loads
fpe =
=
Pse
Pe
+ se c
A
Sb
1, 096.9 1, 096.9(7.96)
+
= 0.755 + 0.776 = 1.531 ksi
1, 452
11, 248
fd = stress due to unfactored dead load at extreme fiber of section where tensile stress is caused by externally applied loads
fd =
Mcr
Vi
Mmax
M g + M SDL
Sb
11, 248
6 7 , 000
=
= 1,854.0 ft-kips
+ 1.531 0.055
12
1, 000
= factored shear force at section due to externally applied loads occurring
simultaneously with Mmax = Vu - VD = 405.4 - 38.4 = 367.0 kips
= maximum factored moment at the section due to externally applied
loads = Mu - Mg - MSDL = 525.4 - 26.6 - 24.5 = 474.3 ft-kips
Vci = 0.6 f c b w d + VD +
= 0.6
ViM cr
M max
7 , 000
367.0(1, 854.0)
(18.5)(26.58) + 38.4 +
= 1,497.7 kips
1, 000
474.3
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:37 PM
Page 15
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.7.11.2.2 Calculate Vci /17.7.11.3.2 Determine Stirrup Spacing
7 , 000
(18.5)(26.58) = 69.9 kips
but not less than 1.7 f c b w d = 1.7
1, 000
Therefore,
Vci = 1,497.7 kips
17.7.11.2.3
Calculate Vcw
where
fpc = compressive stress in the concrete (after allowance for all pretension losses)
at the centroid of cross section resisting externally applied loads
Vp = vertical component of effective prestress force at section
= 0 for straight strands.
Transfer length of strands = 50 strand diameters = 50(0.5) = 25 in. from end of beam.
Since the distance h/2 = 15.25 in. is closer to end of member than the end of the
transfer length of the prestressing strands, a reduced pretensioning force will be considered when computing Vcw.
[AREMA Art. 17.5.9c(2)(c)]
Effective prestress force at distance h/2 from centerline of the bearing,
Pse =
fpc =
932.4
= 0.642 ksi
1, 452
Therefore,
3.5 7 , 000
+ 0.3(0.642) (18.5)( 26.58) + 0 = 238.7 kips
Vcw =
1, 000
17.7.11.2.4
Calculate Vc
17.7.11.3
Calculate Vs and
Shear Reinforcement
Vu
405.4
Vc =
238.7 = 211.7 kips
0.9
17.7.11.3.1
Calculate Vs
17.7.11.3.2
Determine Stirrup Spacing
A vf yd
s
9/24/01
1:37 PM
Page 16
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.7.11.3.2 Determine Stirrup Spacing/17.7.11.3.4Check Stirrup Spacing Limits
Spacing required, s =
Vs
0.80(60)( 26.58)
= 6.1 in. > 4 in.
210.4
O.K.
17.7.11.3.3
Check Vs Limit
0.80(60)( 26.58)
= 319.0 > 210.4 kips
4
O.K.
17.7.11.3.4
Check Stirrup
Spacing Limits
O.K.
7 , 000
(18.5)( 26.58) = 164.6 kips < Vs
1, 000
#6 Bars
2 1/4"
#4 Bar
Note:
#6 Bars at web not
shown for clarity
#4 Stirrups
(4) #4 End
bars
(Typ.)
3 1/4"
11 Spaces @
4" = 3'-8"
#6 Bars
Spacing @ About 6" Centers
CL
Girder
(Symm.)
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:37 PM
Page 17
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.7.12 Deflections/17.7.12.5 Deflection Due to Live Load
17.7.12
Deflections
Camber and deflection calculations are required to determine the bridge seat elevations and maintain the minimum ballast depth. They are also required for the design
of the elastomeric bearings.
1, 219.7 (7.96)( 29(12))
P e L2
= - 0.223 in.
= si c =
8(3, 834)(171,535)
8E ciI
2
17.7.12.1
Camber Due to
Prestressing at Transfer
17.7.12.2
Deflection Due to Beam
Self-Weight at Transfer
17.7.12.3
Deflection Due to
Superimposed Dead Load
17.7.12.4
Long-Term Deflection
According to PCI Design Handbook - 5th Edition, Table 4.8.2, long-term camber and
deflection of prestressed concrete members can be calculated by an approximate method
using multipliers. Calculations are shown in Table 17.7.12.4-1.
Table 17.7.12.4-1
Calculated Deflection, in.
Prestress
Self-Weight
Dead Load
Total
At Release
(a)
0.223
+ 0.037
N/A
0.186
Multiplier
(b)
1.80
1.85
Erection
(c) = (a)(b)
0.401
+ 0.068
+ 0.025
0.308
Multiplier
(d)
2.45
2.70
3.00
Final
(e) = (a)(d)
0.546
+ 0.100
+ 0.075*
0.371
* This is the result of multiplying the dead load deflection at erection (c) by multiplier (d)
17.7.12.5
Deflection Due to Live Load
Live load deflection is generally calculated using influence lines. At this point, use of
a computer program becomes very useful. However, for short span bridges, the
designer can quickly calculate an approximate value for deflection by using the equivalent uniform load. The equivalent uniform live load, wequ, for a simply supported
beam can be derived from the maximum moment at midspan,
MLL + I =
wequ =
D=
w equ L2
8
8M LL + I 8(1, 033.0)(12)
=
= 0.819 kip/in.
2
L2
(29(12))
5(0.819)( 29(12))
384(5, 072)(171,535)
= 0.180 in.
29(12)
= 0.544 in. > 0.180 in.
640
L
640
O.K.
SEPT 01
9/24/01
1:37 PM
Page 19
CHAPTER 17
RAILROAD BRIDGES
17.8 References
17.8
REFERENCES
DEC 00