Since Taiwan withdrew from the United Nations in 1971, it became a pseudo-pariah country

as other states ceased recognising it in favour of China. Adhering to the “One China” policy,
China opposes Taiwan’s membership of various UN bodies. Hence, Taiwan was officially
excluded from the Copenhagen summit and its delegation could only be registered as a non-
governmental organisation from Hsinchu, China.
Thus far, Taiwan has been rather unsuccessful in gaining admission to various multilateral
institutions. It was only in May 2009, after repeated attempts, that Taiwan managed to gain
observer status in the World Health Assembly. China’s strident opposition against Taiwan’s
participation during the summit itself was very clear when the Chinese delegate flatly
rejected the request of Gambian Vice-President Isatou Njie-Saidy to admit Taiwan, while in
his seat, without even bothering to move to the podium to register his opposition.
Taiwan seeks to establish and maintain international exposure and space, and it can achieve
this objective by adopting a coherent policy of environmental diplomacy. In the past, Taiwan
resorted to aid diplomacy and democracy promotion, but since only 23 states currently
recognise Taiwan, these two policies have been proven to be largely ineffective. However,
the issue of climate change provides Taiwan with a suitable platform to create a niche for
itself within international society.
Taiwan has limited representation in multilateral institutions. However, it is a member of the
Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC),
which have been devoting much attention to the issue of climate change. For instance, the
ADB provides developmental aid and assistance to 14 Pacific developing member-countries
such as Kiribati, the Marshall Islands, Nauru, Palau, the Solomon Islands as well as Tuvalu,
which are all Taiwanese allies. In October 2009, the ADB released its “Pacific Approach
2010-2014” that sets out its blueprint to promote sustainable development through enhanced
close co-operation between the governmental and non-governmental organisations there.
As a member of the ADB, Taiwan is therefore in a position to contribute funding and
technological assistance to these states. This benefits Taiwan because disbursing funds
through the ADB reduces direct comparison and competition between the various allies.
At the same time, Taiwan can also leverage on its links with the Vatican, which has become
increasingly environmentally conscious to differentiate itself from China and gain diplomatic
space in the process.
Many Taiwanese do not see themselves as Chinese. Early this week, when Chen Yunlin, the
top Chinese official in charge of Taiwanese affairs visited Taiwan and met with his
counterpart Chiang Pin-kung, it resulted in popular protests as many Taiwanese were against
closer economic relations with China. Although it may not be possible for Taiwan to remain
aloof from China economically due to globalisation, co-operation with the Vatican on
environmental initiatives may assist in Taiwan’s push for a separate identity.
When Pope John Paul II made the opening address at the 1990 World Peace Day, he said that
the emerging global “ecological awareness ... rather than being downplayed, ought to be
encouraged to develop into concrete programmes and initiatives”. In March 2008, the Vatican
updated the seven deadly sins and included blatant environmental degradation as one of them.
Pope Benedict XVI stated that an individual would also “offend God ... by ruining the
environment ...”
At the 2009 World Peace Day, Pope Benedict XVI re-visited this environmental theme, and
emphasised the importance of protecting the environment. On a more serious note, the
Vatican also seeks to use its moral legitimacy to cajole states into doing more to combat
climate change. While attending the Copenhagen climate summit, the Vatican’s nuncio’s to
the United Nations, Archbishop Celestino Migliore said that, “The wisest and most effective
programs focus on information education and the formation of the sense of responsibility in
children and adults toward environmentally sound patterns of development and stewardship
of creation”.
Taiwan has experience in environmental risk management and disaster relief as it is quite
prone to natural disasters such as typhoons and flooding. Hence it is in the position to share
its experience and expertise with its Pacific allies - the very areas that the World Bank’s
2006 Not If but When report recommended that efforts should be directed at.
Given China’s rather unco-operative stance at the Copenhagen climate summit Pacific island
states are unlikely to warm to it as one of the world’s largest polluters. Consequently, any
efforts by Taiwan to help them would be appreciated. Also, climate change is a global issue
that requires global action. Such island-states will therefore not have inflated expectations of
what Taiwan can achieve and, hence, are less likely to be disappointed.
At the same time, the Pacific island states are also unlikely to be punished by China for
recognising Taiwan. When Macedonia switched recognition to Taiwan in February 1999,
China abused its position in the UNSC to veto the extension of the United Nations Preventive
Deployment Force (Macedonia switched its allegiance back to China in November 2000).
The Macedonia issue only affected the Balkan region and so the impact was limited. With
climate change, the effects are global and any attempts by China to derail any initiatives
would undermine Chinese claims of being a responsible stakeholder in international society.
With China’s economic power increasing so rapidly, Taiwan needs to be diplomatically
astute and adroit to maintain its limited international space. The current global attention on
climate change and China’s reluctance to play a more pro-active role on this issue provides
the perfect Trojan horse for Taiwan to push its own foreign policy agenda and create a
distinct international identity.