Professional Documents
Culture Documents
US Asst. Secretary
: There is more emphasis by the US and others about how many changes
have occurred simply because the election took place in January this year
and a government changed thereafter. What beyond the change in
government do you see that encourages for you to believe that there is a
real change, for instance domestic mechanism and the path taken towards
it.
A: It's not just the election or just the change of government but it's about
the change in commitment and the change in direction. A year ago, had I
been here, I could not have had the conversations I had with the
government without virtually every problem being denied. Now the
problems are acknowledged, and the country is reaching out for
partnerships in an effort to help address them.
There are many actions that still needed to be taken and I think everybody
here with whom I have spoken including the government today will
acknowledge that we have seen some initial actions. For example, returning
of the land to people in the North, release of some prisoners and relaxation
of control on the media. I also think there is a lessening in the sense of fear
of self censorships that was prevalent here in the past.
I want to stress that we certainly don't see this as a finished process,
virtually everything is 'unfinished', but it has only been about three months
since the new government came to power. So sometimes it is better to walk
steadily, rather than walk quickly and stumble. As long as the country is
moving forward, in this direction which it has felt to do so, not from what
was imposed from outside forces, but the direction that the people have
chosen, it will have the support of the international community.
?
: One of the urgent needs the northerners were looking for from the new
government was that to give them more preferences to issues related to
the North and one major request was to know about the political prisoners
and the list of the people who went missing, had disappeared and held by
the government whereas the new government went about reinstating a civil
servant as the Northern Governor, reinstating the four star general and
reinstating the office of the CJ before she retired.
So the legal problems the civilians in the North face has not been
concentrated nor given any promises as to what they would do related to
the political prisoners whether they are alive or dead.
Also on the land release, Ceylon Today on its visit to these areas also saw
the land in some part in the Jaffna District being released, however, there
are new areas that have been taken by the Forces, after having put up new
fences around them. Will the US show keen interests on such new
developments as the government has not made any promises so far and
people think the government is hoodwinking them.
A: On the issue of missing people and the disappeared ones, this is
something that I know to be of intense interest to families in many parts of
not only the North. We did visit there and met some of those families. So we
have heard from them. But what I think is this:
The issues of accountability and reconciliation that are being faced are very
complicated. They will take time to resolve and we don't expect those
difficult questions to be resolved in a matter of months.
But the families who lost their loved ones, and those families who lost those
who have disappeared, deserve to know their fate: whether they are alive
or dead. If they are alive, where are they? That is something that should not
have to wait. That is something which is relatively straight forward and it
should happen very soon. We understand it to be extremely important to
those families, perhaps the most important thing the government can do in
the short term to restore trust even as it addresses the much more
complicated question of how to achieve accountability that in a way
satisfies all the people of this country.
On the general question, I like to repeat that nothing is settled but
something has begun and it is very heartening that something has begun.
Also it did not begin because of the international community but because of
the will of the people. The role of the international community is to
continuously encourage this progress and process. We do not assume
success or predict success but to promote success and we will do in
partnership with people.
?
: what further role wills US take in the HR Council and what would happen
after September this year.
A: What we know is that in September the H R commissioner will release
the report on its findings. The US supported the decision to delay the report
to September too, but we still strongly support the decision to release the
report in September. We hope to continue to work between now and
September and build up a domestic process that will be acceptable to the
people so that report can feed into the domestic process eventually. What
happens after September is yet to be determined. what I can say is that it
would continue to be of intense interest in the international community
whether reflected by actions of the human rights council with bilateral
engagement with the government in seeing this process continuing until
the people of this country have a closure.
?
: Is the US concerned about the time frame for the local mechanism.
A: I want them to speak, and I don't want to speak on behalf of the
government. My sense is that there is a strong desire to demonstrate some
progress. First and foremost in response to what the people are asking for
besides, recognizing that the report will be released in September is in the
country's interest to show the international community that is making a
credible effort.
?
: Although it has been a broader issue of the North we see more emphasis
US has on more than one community now. Why was that not pushed harder
before and making it more apparent now.
A: It has always been that case, perhaps people who have to do what I have
been doing for several years now, I think it is easy to understand when
there is a war that is claiming lives on both sides, the focus was on that war
perhaps the exclusion of some of the broader complicated problems that
affected everybody in the society that it deserved news coverage. But the
situation now, it is evident that people have a broad range of concerns and
that is not only the people of the North who were concerned about impunity
but also the people of the East who are concerned about democracy,
corruption and peace. When officials get used to behaving with impunity
towards one community actually they could behave with impunity with all
communities.
That's a terrible thing but perhaps the silver lining is that it is unifying and
everybody recognizes that there is an interest in a government that is
accountable and open to different voices and resolve problems through
political debate and not violence. People here have clearly spoken in that
respect that is very impressive to all in the country and in the world.
One of the messages we had been delivering in the meeting is that many
countries around the world are undergoing terrible happenings some of
them similar to events in the history but was on the defensive stage in the
last few years and now it has an opportunity to be a leader to demonstrate
a positive model to rest of the world how a complicated multi religious multi
ethnic society can resolve its problem through a democratic process. And
we look forward to see that.
?
: What did you witness during your visit to Aluthgama.
A: We wanted to learn about what people had gone through and to see if
there were any chances of progress from the previous years. We showed
our interest and concern and the efforts to promote peace and
reconciliation between the Sinhala and Muslim communities. It feels like
there has been a progress. Good relationships have been built now with
their neighbours, but the violence was caused by irresponsible people
exploiting religions and religious differences.
I think they all expressed a 'cautious optimism' I would stress 'cautious
optimism'. In this new situation things can go back to a harmonious setting
but we will be watching carefully because there's nothing more dangerous
than politicians playing with religions dividing people and encouraging
conflicts using religion, which is sensitive and personal, partly which is also
a persons' identity.
?