You are on page 1of 2

Netscape Communications Corporation et al v. Federal Insurance Company et al Doc.

70
Case 5:06-cv-00198-JW Document 70 Filed 11/22/2006 Page 1 of 2

1 SARA M. THORPE (SBN 146529)


sthorpe@gordonrees.com
2 D. CHRISTOPHER KERBY (SBN 124546)
ckerby@gordonrees.com
3 GORDON & REES LLP
Embarcadero Center West
4 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
5 Telephone: (415) 986-5900
Facsimile: (415) 986-8054
6
Attorneys for Defendant
7 ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 NORTHERN DISTRICT COURT OF CALIFORNIA


10 SAN JOSE DIVISION

11 NETSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS ) CASE NO. 5:06-CV-00198 JW (PVT)


CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; )
12 and ) [PROPOSED CORRECTED] ORDER
AMERICAN ONLINE, INC., a Delaware ) GRANTING DEFENDANT ST. PAUL
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111

13 corporation, ) MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY’S


Gordon & Rees LLP

) MOTION TO SEAL REPLY BRIEF ON


14 Plaintiffs, ) MOTION TO COMPEL [CIVIL L.R. 79-
vs. ) 5(B) AND (C)]
15 )
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an ) Complaint Filed: 12/12/05
16 Indiana corporation; et al., ) Amended Complaint: 2/24/06
)
17 Defendants. ) Accompanying Documents:
) Motion to Seal; Declaration of Sara M.
18 ) Thorpe
)
19 )
)
20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27
28
1
[PROPOSED CORRECTED]ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY’S MOTION TO
SEAL REPLY BRIEF ON MOTION TO COMPEL
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 5:06-cv-00198-JW Document 70 Filed 11/22/2006 Page 2 of 2

2 After considering the pleadings and papers filed in connection with the Motion,

3 including the parties’ Stipulation to Clarify filed on November 22, 2006 and good cause

4 appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Reply to St Paul’s Opposition and the
5

6 Declaration of Leslie A. Pereira with exhibits thereto, all filed on October 12, 2006, shall

7 be sealed in their entirety. The clerk is instructed to place the Reply brief and

8 Declaration with its exhibits from the Court’s file and place them under seal.
9
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, notwithstanding this Court’s sealing order,
10
Plaintiffs Netscape and AOL shall not be precluded or otherwise barred from
11
re-asserting in subsequent pleadings and proceedings any of the arguments or
12
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000

evidence in the sealed Reply brief, the Declaration, or any of the Reply brief’s
San Francisco, CA 94111

13
Gordon & Rees LLP

14 supporting documentation.

15 IT IS SO ORDERED.
16

17
Dated: ____________________ __________________________________
18 PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL
United States Magistrate Judge
19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27
28
2
[PROPOSED CORRECTED]ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY’S MOTION TO
SEAL REPLY BRIEF ON MOTION TO COMPEL