Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Research 2009; 1(2): 107-109
Department of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, VNS Institute of Pharmacy, Neelbud, 462004, Bhopal, India
ABSTRACT
The herbal drug ‘Chandrakhya’ is commonly used in Indian traditional medicine for thousands of years. Various activities
of its rhizome have been reported by several researchers but the studies on leaves are not yet reported. The aim of this
study is to explore the analgesic, antibacterial and an antifungal activity of Zingiber officinale (ZO) [Chandrakhya] leaves
on albino rats. Aqueous and alcoholic extracts of Zingiber officinale leaves were selected at different doses and analgesic
activity was evaluated by acetic acid induced writhing test and tail clip method. The anti-bacterial and anti-fungal activity
of the ZO leaves was evaluated by employing well diffusion method against S. aureus, E.coli, P.vulgaris and C. albicans.
It was found that the aqueous and alcoholic extracts at the dose of 400mg/kg showed significant analgesic activity as well
as shown significant anti-bacterial and anti-fungal activity at the dose of 40 mg/ml. The present study shows the usefulness
of the leaves of Zingiber officinale and indicates that its alcoholic extract is more active than the aqueous extract in
analgesic, antibacterial and antifungal activities.
Table 2: Analgesic activity of aqueous and alcoholic extracts of Zingiber officinale (leaves) by tail-clip method
Analgesic Response Mean time in seconds ± SEM
S. No. Treatment Dose [mg/kg body wt. p.o.]
15 min. 30 min 45 min 60 min
1. Control - 2.4±0.4 2.6±0.29 2.8±0.24 2.9±0.21
2. Standard drug [paracetamol] 50 5.1±0.45 7.2±0.33** 8.1±0.41** 8.8±0.40**
200 1.9±0.72 2.7±0.56 2.9±0.26 3.3±0.81
3. Aqueous extract
400 4.6±0.56 5.8±0.67 5.9±0.49 6.8±0.77
200 2.3±0.41* 3.1±0.28* 3.2±0.72* 3.7±0.69*
4. Alcoholic extract
400 5.7±0.64** 6.3±0.37** 6.9±0.38** 7.7±0.82**
*p<0.01, **p<0.001; n= 6 in each group
rhizome extracts are responsible for many pharmacological 8. Dugenci SK, Arda N, Candan A. Some medicinal plants as
immunostimulants. J Ethnopharmacol 2003; 88(1): 99-106.
activities. [16-17] 9. Young HY, Luo YL, Cheng HY, Hsich WC, Liao JC, Peng WH.
Several types of terpene compounds are known to present Analgesic and anti- inflammatory activities of 6-gingerol. J
antiinflammatory and antinoceptive activities. [17-18] Further Ethnopharmacol 2005; 96(1-2): 207-210.
studies may reveal the exact mechanisms of action 10. Verma SK, Singh M, Jain P, Bordia A. Protective effect of
Zingiber officinale on experimental atherosclerosis in rabbits. Ind
responsible for the analgesic and antimicrobial activities of J Exp Bio 2004; 42: 736-738.
ZO leaves. 11. Kokate CK. Plant constituents. Practical Pharmacognosy. 4th ed.
Hence from the above results it was evident that the leaves Delhi: Vallabh Prakashan; 1977.
have shown significant antibacterial, antifungal and analgesic 12. Khan M, Shingare MS, Zafar R, Ramesh D, Siddiqui AR.
Analgesic activity of fixed oil of Adansonia digitata. Indian J Nat
activity and can be used with ginger rhizomes proving the Prod 2006; 22: 20.
folklore claims. 13. Mukherjee PK. Quality control of herbal drug, 1st ed. New Delhi:
Business Horizons, Pharmaceutical publishers; 2003: 499.
REFERENCES 14. Jain PS, Belsare DP, Mandal SC, Pal SC, Badgujar VB, Surana
SJ. Antimicrobial activity of stem bark of Kigelia Pinnata. Indian
J Nat prod 2006; 22; 30.
1. Suthar AC, Banavalikar MM, Biyani MK, A review on Zingiber
15. Rajnarayana K, Reddy MS, Chaluvadi MR, Krishna DR.
officinale: Pre-clinical and clinical trials. Indian J Trad Know
Bioflavonoids classification, pharmacological, biochemical
2003; 2: 51-56.
effects and therapeutic potential. Indian J Pharmacol 2001; 33: 2-
2. Prajapati ND, Purohit SS, Sharma AK, Kumar T. Handbook of
16.
Medicinal Plants. Jodhpur: Agrobios publication, 2003.
16. Park M., Jungdon B., Dae-Sil L. Antibacterial activity of 10-
3. The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India Vol.1, Govt. of India,
gingerol and 12-gingerol isolated from ginger rhizome against
Dept. of ISMH, New Delhi, 2001.
periodontal bacteria. Phytotherapy Research 2008; 22(11):
4. Kiritikar KR, Basu BD. Indian Medicinal Plants 2nd ed. Vol. 4.
1446 – 1449.
Dehradun: Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh publishers; 1987:
17. Tang W, Eisenbrand G. Chinese drugs of plant origin. Chemistry,
1730.
pharmacology and use in traditional and modern medicine. 1st
5. Evans WC. Pharmacognosy, 15th ed. London (U.K): W. B.
ed.. Kaiserslautern. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1992.
Sanders Company Ltd. 2002.
18. Suekawa M, Ishige A, Yuasa K, Sudo K, Aburada M, Hosoya E.
6. Jolad SD, Lantz RC, Chen GJ, Bates RB, Timmermann BN.
Pharmacological studies on ginger. I. Pharmacological actions of
Commercially processed Zingiber officinale: Composition and
pungent constituents, (6)-gingerol and (6)-shogaol. J
effects on LPS-stimulated PGE2 production. Phytochemistry
Pharmacobiodyn 1984; 7: 836-48.
2005; 66 (13): 1614-1635.
7. Bhandari U, Kanojia R, Pillai KK. Effect of ethanolic extract of
Zingiber officinale on dyslipidaemia in diabetic rats. J
Ethnopharmacol 2005; 97(2): 227-230.