You are on page 1of 43

CODY ROBERT JUDY
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2,
Ogden UT. 84401
801-xxx-xxxx www.codyjudy.us
3080 3814 3127 03 )
-

(UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE TRACKING NUMBER 9114 9012

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Mr. SCOTT HARIS -Office of the Clerk
1 First Street N.E. Washington DC 20543-0001
- - - Re: Judy v. Obama et al., Writ of Certiorari
Dear Mr. Scott Harris – Clerk of the Court
April 13, 2015
Dear Mr. Scott S. Harris, Clerk by: Mr. Andrew Downs:
Thank you for your April 7 th, 2015 letter. Please find the above entitled writ of certiorari as a
resubmission for the Court to docket.
1- Specifically understood as your letter of April 7th the “MOTION AND AFFADAVIT FOR
PERMISSION TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS was not signed by the petitioner. It is signed
March 30th, 2015 BY THE PETITIONER and is headlined in THE UNITED STATES SUPREME
COURT on page 2 on appeal from the 10th Circuit of Appeals, which was also the post mark you
recognized.
2- Also, on page 3 specifically noted The AFFADAVIT of the MOTION TO PROCEED INFORMA
PAUPERIS is signed and dated March 30, 2015 and is headlined in THE UNITED STATES
SUPREME COURT on appeal from the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, pursuant to Rule 39 (1) a
party seeking to proceed in forma pauperis shall file a motion for leave to do so, together with
the party’s notarized affidavit or declaration (in compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746). The
Affidavit fulfills this obligation. Again, this was also the same date you recognized on the post
mark.
3- The Motion also states with the ORDER attached from the United States District Court that the
petitioner was granted permission by the lower Court to proceed in Informa pauperis dated
July 8th,2014.
Rule 39 (1)- “Accordingly, the motion shall state whether leave to proceed in forma pauperis
was sought in any other court and, if so whether leave was granted.”
The leave was granted by the lower the court and the 10TH Circuit Court of Appeals, upon which
the Order is a simple proof or verification for you on the cover page 1. This dated ORDER
signed July 8th,2014 does not comport to the dated Motion for leave to precede Informa
Pauperis in the Supreme Court of the United States signed March 30th, 2015 by the Petitioner.
The Supreme Court can look to the 10th Circuit for this affirmation also.
Of course I would not be appealing to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals with the heading on the Motion
and Affidavit in The UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT; however it is recognized this APPEAL is coming
from the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals and that court also gave me leave to proceed in forma pauperis
as well as the lower U.S. District Court. Although I did cite the motion could be held in abeyance by the
Supreme Court according to Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962); this Court has its own
Motion and Affidavit herein dated March 30th, 2015 and signed by the Petitioner .

2

Concluding: The Supreme Court has been furnished it own MOTION for leave to proceed INFORMA
PAUPERIS with an accompanying AFFADAVIT that is signed MARCH 30 TH, 2015. Thank you for
recognizing these signatures and the headings and the date for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
Sincerely
Signature: /s/ Cody Robert Judy
Cody Robert Judy pro se
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2, Ogden UT. 84401
801-xxx-xxxx www.codyjudy.us

Appellant Judy v. Obama et.al.,

CODY ROBERT JUDY
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2,
Ogden UT. 84401
801-xxx-xxxx www.codyjudy.us

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE TRACKING NUMBERS
1- U.S. Supreme Court- 9114 9012 3080 3814 2913 05
2-Solictor General- 9114 9012 3080 3814 2900 25
3-Barack Obama at the White House w signature confirmation- 2308 2180 0000 2953 9521

-

-

-

-

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Mr.

SCOTT HARIS -Office of the Clerk

1

First Street N.E. Washington DC 20543-0001
Re: Judy v. Obama et al., Writ of Certiorari
Dear Mr. Scott Harris – Clerk of the Court

March 30 th, 2015

Please find the 11 copies of the following Writ of Certiorari for the Tenth Circuit and I certify
herein that the word Count, 8537, is well under those permitted by the rules. Also because this does
involve one or more ACTS of Congress the Solicitor General has been mailed a copy as is noted on the
Declaration of Mailing Certificate.
The case was heard at the 10th Circuit of Appeals and U.S. District Court (Utah Division) Informa
pauperis and Appellee prays the ‘application to appeal in forma pauperis otherwise be held in
abeyance to both the lower Court’s permission grant.’ Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962).

Sincerely,

3

Signature: /s/ Cody Robert Judy
Cody Robert Judy pro se

Appellant Judy v. Obama et.al.,

3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2,
Ogden UT. 84401
801-xxx-xxxx www.codyjudy.us

________
No. 15 -_____
________
IN THE

Supreme Court of the United States
___________
Cody Robert Judy,
Petitioner,
v.
Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro et.al.,
Respondent(s)
On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court
For the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals
________
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

4

Ohio to only take a matter of time? 5 .Question –CONFUSED QUALIFICATION FOR OFFICE OF PRESIDENT. QUESTIONS OF LAW THAT MIGHT BE DECIDED 1. UT. in assistance of the public trust when contributing donations to Presidential Candidates for the coming 2016 election? 2.us Respondent(s) Barack Obama aka Barry 825 North 300 West Suite C400 Salt Lake City.Does the United States of America under the United States Constitution’s leading Court in the public interest of Presidential Contenders announced and unannounced entering the Presidential race need a new definition of ‘natural born Citizen’ for the Office of the President as ‘Citizen’ was determined to be the definitive qualification term for those born at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution. Ogden.Petitioner Cody Robert Judy /Pro se/ Soetoro 3031 So. Utah 84401 Phone: 801-xxx-xxxx Email: Cody@codyjudy. 84103 Barack Obama – The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington DC 20530-0001 I.Question – POLICING THE JUDICIAL BENCH-When a law enforcement investigation report is submitted to the Court under the authority of the Sherman/Clayton Acts of Congress directive to rein in illegal activity by two or more Corporations forming an illegal cartel in the political arena whereupon it is stated the Court’s obliged duty is to direct an investigation with an appropriate prosecutor. Ogden Ave Suite #2. is it a misprision offense if the Court refuses that Congressional Directive that could lead to a dissolution of the entire Supreme Court suggested by Obama recently in Cleveland.

If “Time” and “Place” of vital national importance has no significance or boundary as being born in the U. Happersett. contender in 2008 and 2012 Presidential Elections as well the 2016 Presidential Election being alarmed that the introduction of foreign influences into the Office of the President through U. as well the authority to act under the U. to Citizen Parents consist of two generations. when standing has been recognized. to Citizen Parents. Mr.3. on the determination that success is unlikely due to some of the Defendant’s being elected to Government Office. Sect. 162 (1875) . then of course a domestic jurisdiction is lost to foreign jurisdiction.S. meriting a review of ‘frivolousness or malicious intent’. Cody Robert Judy. statute and compensatory damages noticed by the Court of the amount of $140.00. altar the entire U.000. INTRODUCTION Petitioner Mr. a Court refusal to issue a earned and due ‘Certificate of Default’.S. 88 U.S. 1. Judy brought these concerns to the Court’s attention with a law enforcement investigation. conflict the determination of Justice for all under a standard of review in tort or ‘acting under color of law’ reform? ii II.S. by the precedent case Minor v. . If the qualifications of the Office of the President are not reaffirmed as Born in the U. Constitution defining all Courts and Elected Offices claiming authority and jurisdiction under said Constitution. first generation foreign nationals also termed “Citizens” could ultimately in Obama’s words. citing his § 1983 Civil Rights as a Candidate for President under the terms traditionally upheld are in violation. Cruz. now ignored by lower Courts and being overrun by candidates taking contributions like Sen. Supreme Court Justices lifetime tenure dissolving the Court’s under the definition of the United States Constitution’s terms Article III.S.000.S. a return of service. Constitution. as well delivering an indictment afforded his person under the Sherman and subsequent Clayton Acts of 6 .S. as was affirmed left ‘no doubt’ in defining ‘natural born Citizen’. there is little stopping the dissolution of the entire U.Question – DISCRIMINATION OF INDIVIDUAL CIVIL RIGHTS STANDARD REVIEWDoes refusing to recognize two witnesses of service of process.

Mr. Judy witnesses that illegal actions commiserating Obama’s candidacy in two different forms signed by Rep. pg iii III. Mr. Judy’s campaign for the same Office in a discrimination of his Civil Rights. Obama’s OFA. attesting to Obama’s qualification for office. but in a position of Speaker of the House. ultimately refusing to acknowledge service of process confirmed by two sworn witnessed accounts. Petitioners here and Appellant below are: Cody Robert Judy Respondent here and Appellee below are: Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro representing Organization for Action hereafter (OFA) and herein considered acting under color of state law as President albeit a usurpation or illegal occupation. Judy properly served the Defendant’s at the same place where contributions are taken for both nationally recognized organizations forming the cartel. Nancy Pelosi.S. This constituted the formation of an illegal cartel by definition that conspired to knock out of competition Mr. PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING Pursuant to Rule 14. and ultimately after that refused to issue service of process from an Informa pauperis litigant. Judy’s campaigns have been recognized nationally and he meets the high criteria of standing suffering direct harm by these illegal actions in the face of reporting them to proper authority of the Courts in the directives of Congressional Acts afforded to him.Congress directing the U. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit are listed. 7 .S. not in the duty of her elected office as Representative. in the State of Utah where he resides and holds residency and after the appropriate time filed for the Certificate of Default which the Court then refused. the parties here and in the proceeding in the U. Mr. District Court to open an immediate investigation into the alleged Cartel formed by two or more Corporations herein stated to be the DNC and Mr. 1 (b).

National Chair Jim Dabaki – Utah Chair Mat Lyon – UT.i QUESTIONS OF LAW THAT MIGHT BE DECIDED II. iv IV. INTRODUCTION Pg.S. Nancy Pelosi U. Rep. Senate Majority Leader ‘08. House Majority Leader ’08-‘10 – Acting under color of state law but also noticed as not acting in her official duties in an illegality of attesting by two witnesses Obama as eligible for the DNC.S. TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Pg. TABLE OF CONTENTS Pg.Deputy Director Democratic National Committee hereafter (DNC) Debbie Wasserman Shultz.iii III.v-vii V. D-NV U. TABLES OF CONTENTS PREAMBLES CAPTION OF THE CASE I.Mitch Stewart-Director Jeremy Bird.ii Pg. Sen. PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING Pg.S. Executive Director D-CA. Pg.Acting under color of state law. Harry Reid – U.iv IV. vi 8 .

§X PETITIONER’S CASE HISTORY Pg. §VI STATUTORY PROVISIONS Pg.1 VIV.2 §VII STATEMENT OF THE CASE §VIII.S. Appendix X. 6 §3U.12 XIIII.2 §V JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT Pg. TO CITIZEN PARENTS” IS THE ONLY CONSTRUCT NOT COVERED IN NATURALIZATION Pg. §1 BRIEF IN SUPPORT FOR THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIOARI TO BE GRANTED Pg. §VIV A STANDARD OF DISCRIMINATION Pg.S.11 XII.7-9 §4 FAILED ATTEMPTS TO CHANGE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IN CONGRESS Pg 9 XI. §IV. STATUTES Pg.15 9 .VI. §XII ENUMERATIONS OF SCHOLASTIC PROFESSIONALS TO ABSORB NATURAL BORN CITIZEN INTO CITIZEN Pg. Pg. §XI ADDITIONAL MOTIVES FOR DISCRIMINATION Pg.13 XIV.CITIATIONS OF OFFICIAL AND UNOFFICIAL ORDERS AND OPINION VIII.3 §2PROVING NATURAL BORN CITIZEN “BORN IN THE U. vii-viii BODY VII. Pg. Code: Title 8 .ALIENS AND NATIONALITY Pg.

Pg. DECLARATION OF MAILING CERTIFICATE AFFADAVIT XVII. §XIII SUMMARY TO THE QUESTIONS RAISED IN THIS APPEAL FOR CERIOARI TO BE GRANTED Pg. . COVER APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENT XIII.XV. APPENDIX v.17-19 APPENDAGES XVI. 10 Pg. Pg.

17 U.S.S. Jennison (1840) 19 Judy v. 2:2008cv01162 NV District Crt 12 Judy v. Amendment XIV 17 U. Obama et. Amendment XV 11 U.S.al. 1:14cv00093 1. Article III. McCain et.C. Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 14-4136 1.12 Marbury v. Supreme Court Rules cited 11 . Supreme Court 96-7655 12 Holmes v. Art. Section 8.3. Obama et. Article II.S. 162 (1875) iii. U..C.S.12 Judy v.S.S.10. Sect.S. Obama U. Amendment XX 3 Amendment XIX 11 Amendment XXIV 11 U.S. Hickley et alUtah’s Division 95cv952 12 Tenth Circuit Court.15. U. 88 U.2. District Court case No. 08A391 4 STATUTES Page U.12 Judy v. Phil Berg v Obama et. TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page Judy v. Clause 5 iii.C 12-5276 2. Happersett.2.S.I .S. al No.S. al. 137 [p175 17 Minor v. Madison 5 U.4.C.S. I iii U.C. Sect. al.11.S.C.V. I..96-4045 12 U.. Clause 10 8 U.C.

6.A 1331 1 28 U.S. 107-155.C. No.A 1343 (3) 1 28 U.17 5.12 The Clayton Act 1914 ii. §1251 ii 28 U. 1 (b) ii vi ACTS OF CONGRESS cited Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 Pub. Sen. L.Nationals and citizens of United States at birth (a-h) 9.S. Non-binding Resolution 511 12 12 .2 Naturalization Act of 1790 was repealed by the Naturalization Act of 1795 9 The Sherman Act 1890 ii. Stat 81.2 U.S.S. 28 U.S.116.C.2.C.C. 42 §1983 iii.113-14 § 403 (a) (3) 1 8 U. Code § 1401 .S. 7.Rule 14.

Petitioner. Obama et. 2. Sep. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ________ PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI IV. 2015 13 . 16th. Respondent(s) On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court For the U. Oct.vii IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ___________ Cody Robert Judy. 26 th.. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 14-4136 Three Judge Court Honorable Justices Lucero. 3rd. 7th. al. District Court case No.al. 2015 Feb.S. 1:14cv00093 Honorable Stewart from July 7th filing date: Judgments and Rulings on Aug.Judy v.al. Tymkovich. §IV CITATIONS OF THE OFFICIAL AND UNOFFIICAL REPORTS OF THE OPINIONS AND ORDERS 1. 27 th . v..S.Judy v.S. and Phillips Judgments and Rulings Feb. U.. Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro et.2014. U. Obama et.

2014 Petitioner Cody Robert Judy a Presidential Candidate in 2008. VII.C. Title 42 § 1983 – 28 U.C.S. §1251. Stat 81. and 42 U.116.S. has been denied the Ballot Challenges in U. L.C 12-5276 and a Rehearing Jan 7 th 2013. petitioner pro se herein does respectfully submit this PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI pursuant 28 U.A 1343 (3) and 28 U. and 2016 having standing.113-14.S. but continually being caused damages sought remedy by compensation and statutory relief under § 1983 Civil Rights and an Anti-Trust Law Suit under provisions of the Sherman and subsequent Clayton Act citing the commission of illegal acts to usurp the Office of the President with an unqualified person.S. § 403 (a) (3) of Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 Pub.S. Clause 5 noting Barack Obama was not a ‘natural born Citizen’ and brought to the attention of the Court fabricated identification(s) of Barack 14 . The Clayton Act 1914 §29(b).C. II.S. (Appendix P. 2012. No.A 1331 -(providing for direct appeal to the Supreme Court. §V JURISDICTION STATEMENT on WRIT OF CERTIORARI Cody Robert Judy. Art.C. §VII STATEMENT OF THE CASE On July 7th. and reported to the Court the illegal Cartel formed in two corporations in the DNC and OFA. §VI STATUTORY PROVISIONS Because of the statutory provisions being lengthy they are set forth in the Appendix. 107-155.C.4 #11) The case involved breaching the Constitutional Qualifications cited in the U.V. Sect.) VI. conspiring in collusion of commission of crime(s). I.S.

S. was appealed to the U. A Petition for a Writ of Certiorari is now submitted to the Court seeking the following: 1.The Tenth Circuit Three Panel upheld lower Court Ruling hearing the case de novo. or over turning the lower Courts decision not to grant Appellant the Certificate of Default. Supreme Court.2014. Judy v. 7th. 1:14cv00093 Honorable Stewart from July 7th Judgments and Rulings on Aug.com/2010/04/142101/ “Justice Clarence Thomas: We’re evading eligibility”. 27 th .S. §VIII BRIEF IN SUPPORT FOR THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIOARI TO BE GRANTED This case made clear. 2015 Feb. Obama et.S. Oct. 1. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 14-4136 Three Judge Court Honorable Justices Lucero. and malicious. Judy v. granting the Writ Certiorari with the witnesses and lawful investigation allowed in Court .Obama aka Barry Soetoro and other actions in the offenses involving all the defendants listed to cover up the usurpation in an illegal coup ‘d etat of the executive branch which is exactly the condition of our state with an unqualified and thusly unauthorized person in the Office of the President. 2015 to the U. 2. Obama et.Judge then Dismissed case as Unlikely to succeed-wholly incredible. VIII.S. Sep..The Rehearing Request for a full panel poll was similarly dismissed 3.wnd. originated as U.The case is remanded with a Notice of Appeal March 16 th. Jose Serrano. Amendment XX stating. that Petition did not seek as a remedy for the Court to remove Barack Obama from the Office of the President attributing that to Congress’s Duty under U.Plaintiff served the Defendants properly – Witnessed Return of Service by Ali Judy 3. D-N. 16th.S. and Phillips Judgments and Rulings Feb. 26th.” 15 . U.C.Plaintiff’s motion to precede Informa pauperis was reviewed and granted. 2. 2015 1. Tymkovich. 3rd. subsequent to Justice Thomas’s statement to Subcommittee Chairman Rep..Either this Court hear the case de novo.. al. District Court case No. Story Reported at WND here: http://www.al. “or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify.Y.After appropriate time expired Plaintiff asked for and was Denied Certificate of Default 4.

meaning a person could be elected but still fail to qualify. Judy was not asking for that. The report quoting Justice Thomas and Rep. “We’re giving you another option.S. Art. al No. how many cases have been dismissed because of a ‘lack of standing’ across the Nation as ‘citizens’ were denied standing in the Presidential Race beginning with Phil Berg v Obama et. which requires the president to be a natural-born citizen but has no such clause for a Supreme Court justice. referring to the Constitution. “so you never have to answer that question. Jose Serrano: “And you don’t have to be born in the United States. And we couldn’t get those upheld. the whole Constitution and the Supreme Court be removed as ‘fun’ in a matter of time? [ http://www.theblaze. but you answer this one?” “We’re evading that one.C.. a “natural born Citizen” after the original signers’ generation had passed away.S. II.” answered Thomas. and lastly. If the qualifications of the Office of the President were so simple including in reverse of U.com/stories/2015/03/18/ready-obama-says-it-would-be-fun-toamend-the-constitution-to-fix-campaign-finance/ ] 16 . Supreme Court did not want to be the burdened bench of removing a ‘president elect’ in the seated assignment for Congress.” Clearly the intent was that the U.” “Oh really?” asked Serrano. 35 years of age or older. He was simply filing for the damaged assessed by the criteria of his legal ‘standing’ and asking the Court to assess the damages to his campaign run over and damaged with the fair and equal standard of rules applied to all Candidates for the Office of President. “So you haven’t answered the one about whether I can serve as president. 1. a “Citizen” at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution. referring to questions of presidential eligibility and prompting laughter in the chamber. 08A391? Probably well over 95% of cases were dismissed for a lack of standing and the rest on a lack of jurisdiction or other technical aspects.” said Thomas.Clause 5: 1234- Being Being Being Being a resident of at least 14 years. Sect. how in the world would the Constitution last or as Obama pondered aloud in Cleveland. and Mr. Indeed. Ohio. These are things that have sensationalized disrespect and disdain for the standards of the Constitution and in such the Supreme Court itself as the leading Court.

S. and authority but the lower courts have denied even a hearing to Mr. money. In law. Judy with the witnesses he has furnished. and the Loss of all the time and talent within the Campaign. Mr. and even reputation. The sweat equity of a Campaign has a price tag just like the sweat equity of a house or property would. Judy has standing and has suffering the discrimination of the standard equally applied as the law by the Campaign of the Cartel formed by the DNC and OFA in illegal actions meant to harm him and carnage the qualifications for the Office of the President in the U. In a Review of Standing as a Presidential Candidate in the race for President what possible damages would the Court assess to a Candidate for President when the ‘Office of the President’ is not on the table? Well it would be Campaign Contributions. Judy doesn’t think that is funny and he doesn’t think it would be fun to dissolve the Supreme Court and the Constitution. Constitution. Judy need only prove a ‘natural born Citizen’ is Born in the U. standing or locus standi is the term for the ability of a party to demonstrate to the court sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support that party's participation in the case especially noticed in this particular case: 17 .Under the provisions of standing Mr. Judy’s Campaign for President in 2008 and 2012 wherein ‘constitutionally unqualified candidate’ Barack Obama illegally usurped the Office of the President caused horrific damages of time. talent. property. If that is funny to the Court.S. It would fall under ‘statute’ of any violations of Congressional Act that prohibited illegal activity by Candidates or the Corporations they run Campaigns within to keep their personal fortunes beyond reproach and liability. Judy has done all of that with proficiency in the Court standards of evidence with proper venue. In order to prevail Mr. That Mr. to Citizen Parents which he can easily do because that is the only prohibited definition from ‘naturalization’ classes listed on multiple Government Agency’s directing and in charge of such. the premise is the Court’s own demise is also funny to the Justices? Mr. jurisdiction. The Court and has denied him a jury trial on the facts provided meeting the standards of evidences and have refused to give a Certificate of Default when the Defendant’s defaulted after the Court signed 20 Day Summons were served and ignored by the Defendants.

S. Obama and other candidates now entering like Sen. Ted Cruz. To have a court declare a law unconstitutional. In the United States. 2. or just hoped someone would go to Court who had standing and could take a stand for the Constitution. 18 . and will dismiss the case without considering the merits of the claim of unconstitutionality. In the United States. §2PROVING NATURAL BORN CITIZEN “BORN IN THE U. He’s run on behalf of those who couldn’t run. This is called the "something to lose" doctrine. to Citizen Parents” including Sen. the law might so adversely affect others that one might never know what was not done or created by those who fear they would become subject to the law – the so-called "chilling effects" doctrine. Sen. The party is not directly harmed by the conditions by which they are petitioning the court for relief but asks for it because the harm involved has some reasonable relation to their situation. there must be a valid reason for the lawsuit. Judy hasn’t just run for President for himself.S. The party suing must have something to lose in order to sue unless it has automatic standing by action of law. the court will rule that the plaintiff "lacks standing" to bring the suit. the current doctrine is that a person cannot bring a suit challenging the constitutionality of a law unless the plaintiff can demonstrate that he/she/it is or will "imminently" be harmed by the law. because while the plaintiff might not be directly affected. in which the party has standing because they directly will be harmed by the conditions for which they are asking the court for relief. This is costing a great deal of time and money to his Campaigns and he just can’t fight this battle alone without “Justice”. While everyone has pointed fingers at whose responsibility it was to vet a Candidate our whole Country and 320 million Americans have had their national security compromised. Mr. The party is directly subject to an adverse effect by the statute or action in question. this is the grounds for asking for a law to be struck down as violating the First Amendment. TO CITIZEN PARENTS” IS THE ONLY CONSTRUCT NOT COVERED IN NATURALIZATION. Mr. were not qualified by ‘place’ or ‘time’. He is a last hope of civility of the law to many. and the continued existence of the harm may affect others who might not be able to ask a court for relief.1. Judy has seen it as a duty as a Candidate to object to anyone who was breaking the rules out of the gate standing for the principle against anyone who was not “Born in the U. McCain. and the harm suffered will continue unless the court grants relief in the form of damages or a finding that the law either does not apply to the party or that the law is void or can be nullified. Otherwise.

in an abstinence of rationality. which is why the U.S. Judy personally. A ‘natural born Citizen’ can also be considered a ‘Citizen’. is sometimes referred to as bottom-up logic. as well as details of Congressional attempts to change it unsuccessfully.S.S. sometimes referred to as top-down logic. Its counterpart. 19 . in much the same manner that a juvenile girl is not a mature woman. Supreme Court needs to reverse the lower Courts decisions in this case.S. inductive reasoning.S. The Court in the process of argumentum ad hominem denied Mr. Judy has brought to its attention. Code § 1401 . Code: Title 8 .S. understood as truth. Senators and U. the Court must concede to reasoning the truth of the facts deductively presented or be found totally irrational.Deductive reasoning is a logical process in which a conclusion is based on the concordance of multiple premises that are generally assumed to be true.ALIENS AND NATIONALITY 8 U. Perhaps the Court’s legal relationship with truth. however the Court has not disproven the truth of the facts Mr.Nationals and citizens of United States at birth (e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person. and representing invalidity for all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing 2. as well it is understood that ‘natural born Citizen’ is not a term used in any construction of ‘Citizen’ in U. but ‘Citizen’ is not always a ‘natural born 1 Citizen’. and hear the case de novo. Representatives? However if ‘motive’ for the irrationality is proven. Most certainly the Court’s thus far have refused all logical reasoning and facts. that are literally effecting millions of people adversely.S. terms of traditional normalcy has already been vacated and the relationship has ended with the U.ALIENS AND NATIONALITY U. Code Title 8. a traitor to truth and justice. Code: Title 8 . but a woman can be seen as a girl 2 Edmund Burke Quote §3 U.S. Constitution’s rationality that aliens and nationality in ‘citizens’ has infiltrated the distinction unique for the Office of the President as a ‘natural born Citizen’ from ‘Citizen’ required for U. 1 and Constitution itself.

These all identify factors of time and place and are considered law but they are not considered staples to break the law of qualification for the President to be a ‘natural born Citizen’.S.S. These are those who qualify as ‘natural born Citizens’ and represent a ‘time’ period qualifier. The only category missing (see for yourself 8 U. U.ALIENS AND NATIONALITY 8 U. outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who. and the other a citizen of the United States Sen. prior to the birth of such person. U. Code: Title 8 . Code: Title 8 .S. Code: Title 8 . Code § 1401 .ALIENS AND NATIONALITY 8 U.S. above. all but thirty days of her life but left with a foreign prince for his off spring also can be a Citizen as long as the person was born before high noon. but these definitions do not afford ‘natural born Citizen’ which is the requirement for the Commander-InChief and President.S.Now let's look at the following where the person is born outside the USA which requires both parents to be US citizens at the time of birth in a foreign nation: U. and 28 days old in the age factor is discretionary to the requirement standard of 35 years of age for the Office of the 20 . had resided in the United States. 1934.Nationals and citizens of United States at birth (g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien. Just as the 34 years. Code § 1401 sections a-h) is a person born within the United States of America to parents both of whom are US citizens.S.S. If it was 11:59 am it surely is not afforded. Why is that? Because you cannot grant natural condition given all laws passed by Congress establish an artificial effect. is also a naturalized at birth (legally granted) citizen.S. This person.S. not a natural born citizen.Nationals and citizens of United States at birth (h) a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24. This is his naturalization statement afforded as an adoption. to Citizen Parents’ are prohibited in qualifying for a naturalization affect. Citizen Adoption is upon an 81 year old mother who tripped out of the U.ALIENS AND NATIONALITY 8 U. U. Ted Cruz born in Canada to one parent who was a Citizen is described above.S. Code § 1401 . Code § 1401 . prior to the birth of such person.Nationals and citizens of United States at birth (c) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions. 11 months. Indeed. In regards to aliens and nationals we have identified laws made by Congress to assist us in identifying qualifications for “Citizens” leaving deductive reasoning alone to the understanding that those ‘born in the U.

and succeed to all their rights. and it is presumed. The society is supposed to desire this. if the Seas were low that day does it count?”. The understood true definition of the natural born Citizen requirement for the Oval Office as described throughout the entirety of Chapter XIX is summed up in this section from 212: ‘The natives. on entering into 21 . Far from being ‘just a qualification for President’. nor devolve on. the Supreme Law stated as a ‘natural born Citizen’ for the Office of the President is indeed a standard law. John Jay wrote to George Washington. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens. Clause 10 “to define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas. that each citizen. Referenced and understood well by the Founders was Emer de Vattell’s Law of Nations Vattel’s international treatise on Natural Law. I.S. presiding officer of the Convention: Permit me to hint. Deductive reasoning would suggest and assume natural born Citizen was completely absent any foreign alien loyalty in jurisdiction of time and place. of parents who are citizens. whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government. and Offences against the Law of Nations.and. book 1 – Chapter XIX. The Law of Nations. Art. Though undefined in a glossary for the Constitution neither is the word “Pirate” or “Court” although it should be noted that Congress is in the instance given powers U. are those born in the country. On July 25. as matter of course. are nonsensical as are the assertions that deductive reasoning cannot assist in the matter of determination of what a ‘natural born Citizen’ is in the requirements of time and place for jurisdictional authority. those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers. any but a natural born Citizen. The Court should not look at substantiated evidence in a case as a luxury item to afford or not to afford like getting a massage. Section 8. 1787. or natural-born citizens. those who are not ‘natural born Citizens’ fail this time and place honored and lawfully reserved requirement for the Office of the President. in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation.C.” “How does one know what a pirate is. and to declare expressly that the Command in chief of the American army shall not be given to.President.

Vladimir Putin and North Korea Kim Jong-un’s son could for instance gain access to the Oval Office and once there could use the Executive Fiat Powers to transform the Republic under the U. it will be only the place of his birth. Constitution by circumvention and even obliteration of powers given the Judicial and Legislative Branches within the Constitution.S.wikipedia. People like Barack Obama. in order to be of the country. This requirement was intended to protect the nation from foreign influence.org/wiki/Naturalborn-citizen_clause : Status as a natural-born citizen of the United States is one of the eligibility requirements established in the United States Constitution for election to the office of President or Vice President. that. Marco Rubio. citizenship "by birth" or "at birth. A 2011 Congressional Research Service report stated in a rather deceptive convoluted way to members of Congress: The weight of legal and historical authority indicates that the term "natural born" citizen would mean a person who is entitled to U. on their coming to the years of discretion. the will of the People. Congress has well understood this and many debates on are public record. reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it." either by being born "in" the United States and under its jurisdiction. by being born abroad to U.” Common Law is often seen as the legal British practice of openly subverting Constitutional Law. The wiki definition of natural born Citizen cites: http://en. The Constitution does not define the phrase natural-born citizen. Without the check and balances the entire Republic falters into a democratic or mobbed ruled tyranny headed by an empirical despot and the individual rights are thrown out to a self serving dictator. for. if he is born there of a foreigner. citizen-parents. The debate to keep ‘natural born Citizen’ as the qualifier for President. and not his country. and through them and given the long standing record. Ted Cruz. and what they owe to the society in which they were born. they may renounce their right. even those born to alien parents. I say. Our Founder’s chose the term ‘natural born Citizen’ to prevent a civil coup d’ e’tat. or by being born in other situations meeting legal 22 .S. and various opinions have been offered over time regarding its precise meaning.S. and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. The Naturalization Act of 1790 was repealed by the Naturalization Act of 1795 and specifically repealed was the detailed term ‘natural born Citizen’ as a term synonymous with Citizen. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children. We shall soon see whether. it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen. has and is the prevailing wish of Congress.society.

” Sept. 2005. were sponsors. brought S. D-Mich. which would have done the same as Snyder’s. 2004. John Conyers. Conyers. 3. 1.com/2011/07/317705/#swdZcDI1CYKsQLI1. which addressed Sen. on April 10. 25. the same as Rohrabacher’s. “Why go to the extent of proposing that ‘natural born Citizen’ be changed to ‘Citizen’ if indeed Congress even believes the terms are synonymous? This would be illogical and irrational. 2003.S. 2004. only the requirement to be a citizen was lowered to 20 years. HJR42.. Vic Snyder. tried to attach to SB 2678. and who was thus born an "alien" required to go through the legal process of "naturalization" to become a U.” But it defined NBC as someone who was born in and is subject to the United States. HJR15. to be eligible to hold the offices of president and vice president.S. Claire McCaskill.99 Within the U.. to require only 20 years citizenship to be eligible for the office of president. The reason it is convoluted is it fails to acknowledge that the specific terms listed by its advice are listed under 8 U. D-Mich. R-Calif. brought HJR 104. citizen.S. HJR2. Supreme Court’s Constitutional powers is the ability to rule that a congressionally approved ACT is in fact a violation of the Constitution. brought HJR 59.” Jan. but who have been citizens of the United States for at least 35 years. Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act.. “unable to alter or remove” the requirement. Rep. http://www.requirements for U. 2003. with Senate Resolution 511. Sen. Gallups reports that finally.” Obama’s qualifications never were reviewed. 2008. would not include a person who was not a U. Sen. Deductive reasoning would ask. §4 FAILED ATTEMPTS TO CHANGE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IN CONGRESS Just since 2003 eight attempts to change the qualifications for President centered on abandoning the ‘natural born Citizen’ unique qualifier. however.. 2128 to “try to counter the growing Democrat onslaught aimed at removing the natural born citizen requirement.. D-N. 2005.. It was intended to “permit persons who are not natural born citizens of the United States. R-Okla. Obama and thenSen. More importantly however wouldn’t this be indication where all of Congress was ruling against Obama’s eligibility and stating he was ineligible?         June 11. Don Nickles. requiring 35 years’ citizenship. Feb. Rohrabacher.S. 28. Rep. an amendment clarifying what “natural-born citizen” includes. Hillary Clinton. 2008. Feb.Y.” which was not the understanding of the framers of the Constitution. citizenship "at birth. brought HJR67. “to make eligible for the office of president a person who is not a natural born citizen of the United States but has been a United States citizen for at least 20 years. April 14. Dana Rohrabacher. 2005. Feb. So the 23 . Rep.S. 15. 4. D-Mo. John McCain’s qualifications as a “natural-born citizen. Snyder.wnd. Code § 1401 (a-h) as ‘naturalization qualifiers of aliens and nationals’ previously discussed cloaking it with the words “legal” and “historical” armor which couldn’t be further from the truth. the Senate changed the focus of the issue. citizen by birth or at birth. D-Ark.B." Such term.. Sept.

didn’t she representing the DNC and Democratic Party submit just one nomination form to all 50 States in 2008? The two different forms were signed the same day and stamped by the same Notary of Public. A cartel is formed in the process of illegal actions contrived to unfairly eliminate competition. but in the political arena the Office for the President is a service job for the American People and to get that job ‘votes’ are needed which is the product and the price paid to gain the service. Constitution. yes the death knell in breaking up corporations is a monopoly on a product or service. it’s a very big deal when you consider the place to be the United States of America and the time to be the formation of the 24 .S. Deductive reasoning would ask. This is where the illegal monopoly or cartel was formed by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) a corporation and another corporation Obama’s Campaign Organization for Action (OFA). Nancy Pelosi representing the DNC authorized an illegal candidate as qualified under the Constitution acknowledged in 2008 by two forms of certification: One for Hawaii and one for the other 49 States. why as had been the tradition of this generation. Supreme Court’s power to assign damages by statutes of Congress upon violations of an ACT of Congress. “If everything was above board. Yes. It is also within the U. and certify tacit consent in the cover up of fraud. Rather than lie fifty times she chose to lie once to Hawaii. Hawaii was the only State in the Union requiring the Political Party representative certify under oath that their candidate was qualified under the United States Constitution and not just certify that this was the Candidate for the Democratic Party.S. But the half of the population was not considered guilty of the offence it was a small group of people deciding as head of a larger organization to subvert the United States Constitution and trivialize “time and place” as unimportant. (Appendix P.4 #10) This is powerful motivation for the entire network of the national Democratic Party representing at least a good half of the population.Judicial Branch does have the power to check and balance both the Legislative and Executive Branch with rulings that they then must alter or amend in harmony of the U. The underhanded step taken into the ‘out-of-bounds-zone’ or illegal formation of the cartel was when ACTS of Congress failed to change the Constitution’s ‘natural born Citizen’ president qualifier clause. Normally. Rep.

a colleague candidate in the race for President. VIV. advocating in favor of Mr. color. Judy had won by time and service of process. religion. and Amendment XXIV and this is the violation of 28 U. and subsequently the Judge suddenly dismissed the whole case as ‘unlikely to prevail’ and thus rooted in frivolousness in the face of a report from the Cold Case Posse of Sheriff Joe Arpaio (Appendix P. Article II. Amendment XIX.S. understanding laws. as a standard.4 #11) . While in U. To trivialize this as simply “Mr.S.C. any practice or law that has the effect of seriously dissuading the exercise of a constitutional right. Clause 5 “Citizen was the qualification at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution”. Section 1. Amendment XV. for which discrimination can apply and does apply requisite of damages. Discrimination based on contempt of the LAW or withholding the law from one as a Civil Right for an individual. Judy and his Campaign for the Office of the President. Supreme Court in the United States Constitution. Judy. In Constitutional Law. a law enforcement’s investigation showing identity fraud handed out by Obama on record to the White House Press Core in a phony or fabricated long form 25 . “No person accept a natural born Citizen” is the requirement of law. and continual damages occurring and suffered for in the coming election of 2016. §VIV A STANDARD OF DISCRIMINATION While the qualifications for the Office of the President in the United States Constitution are set as a Standard of Law it is a logical error or fallacy of presumption that qualification amounts to discrimination in the intent and purposes of the Law. The case in the lower Court was not given a Certificate of Default which Mr. Judy as a Presidential Candidates’ aspirations” is wholly incredible and malicious. prior servitude. Judy as a Candidate for President in the elections of 2008. is equal to the discrimination based on race. 2012.Nation and the implications to dissolve Congress and the U.C. the right to run for the Office of President as long as one meets the standard qualifications in a fair race has been inflicted upon an entire population.S. Therefore as pundits in the media might trivialize a discrimination flippantly against Obama in the form of a racist cliché for simply demanding the law that is the standard for all apply. the real unlawful discrimination has occurred by the hand of the Cartel’s actions against Mr. or gender.C. such as in this case. or economic conditions formed in U. 42 §1983 against Mr.S.

7th. Judy’s legal actions to gain the evidence used against him in a criminal prosecution spear headed by the LDS Church Presidency are well known and publicized coming up instantly at the click of a button.S.birth certificate.C . 26 th. Obama et. Judy v. Judy’s Civil Rights? This is a prime example of shooting the massager to destroy the truth in the message again employing argumentum ad hominem.. U. Judy has a record of prior servitude of 3018 days in an unlawful prosecution.S. §X PETITIONER’S CASE HISTORY Indeed if a record of principle has been upheld since 2008 Mr.S. al. al. 12-5276 U.as well this case : 1. Oct.. VIV. Hickley et alUtah’s Division 95cv952 as well as the Tenth Circuit Court.al.964045 and U. Sep... 3rd.2014.Judy v. Judy have the right to run a fair race according to the rules? The position of the Office of the President is an employment opportunity and Mr. McCain et. al. 2015 Feb.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 14-4136 Three Judge Court Honorable Justices Lucero. 2. Judy’s law suits against both Sen. McCain that included Sen. The Report constituting new and additional information found in March 2011 substantiating the element of criminal actions from the Appellee Cartel. §XI ADDITIONAL MOTIVES FOR DISCRIMINATION 26 . 27 th . Supreme Court 96-7655 are understood. U. 2:2008cv01162 NV District Crt and Judy v. Obama et. and Phillips Judgments and Rulings Feb. The circumstances in U. 2015 recognize a stand for the principle or standard of law the affects of which constitute a civil rights abuse.S. District Court case No.S. Has this come back as motivation to dismiss the case and the truth discriminatingly in violation of Mr. District Court. In an assessment of discrimination of Civil Rights in consideration of this case we must ask first: Was a Civil Right that is protected violated? Does Mr.Judy v. Obama et. and also elaborating on an invalid draft registration that had been fabricated. 16th. Obama noticed in Judy v. 1:14cv00093 Honorable Stewart from July 7th filing date: Judgments and Rulings on Aug. Tymkovich. and Mr.

is expected to run for President against Mr. Baldock . The Four of the eight Justice nominated by the Defendant/Appellee in the Tenth Circuit were: Judge Gregory B. Bush brother of 2016 Candidate Jeb Bush Judge Neil M.Nominated by Pres. . Obama Hillary Clinton undeclared and favored in the Democratic Party which is also a party to this action. Clinton / Pres.Nominated by President George Bush Senior son of 2016 Candidate Jeb Bush Judge Timothy M. Kelly Jr. Obama Judge Nancy L.Nominated by President Ronald Reagan 27 .Nominated by President Ronald Reagan Senior Judge Stephen H. Judy.Nominated by Pres. Bush brother of 2016 Candidate Jeb Bush Judge Harris L.Nominated by President George W. Judy brought this up as a concern in a Poll taken for the whole Court to hear the case but the Clerk of the Court stated these were the only Justices that would be taken part in the poll or asking for one. Moritz . Chief Justice Mary Beck Briscoe . Judy objected to these Justices involved in the Poll but the objection was of no affect.Nominated by President Ronald Reagan Senior Judge John C. Mr. Clinton.Nominated by Defendant.Nominated by Defendant. . Bush brother of 2016 Candidate Jeb Bush The Court was left with Senior Judges but one shy of a full panel. Hartz . to be fair in his objection of a relative to Hillary Clinton in Pres.Additional motives that may be employed to effect such warrantless dismissals in this case in the lower Courts also consist of the majority of the Tenth Circuit Court being employed because of Mr. also included the nominations of those Justices: Judge Paul J. McHugh .Nominated by President Ronald Reagan Senior Judge Bobby R. considered Jeb Bush a relative to two former presidents Bush Sr. Holms . Obama Judge Scott M. Phillip . Bush brother of 2016 Candidate Jeb Bush Judge Jerome A.Nominated by President George W. Lucero . Porfilio . Senior Judge David M. Judy also a wife to former President Bill Clinton had nominated two. Obama’s or Hillary Clinton’s husband former President Bill Clinton nomination.Nominated by Defendant. Indeed Mr. Anderson .Nominated by President George W. 2016 Candidates' Hillary Clinton Judge Carlos F. and Bush W. Obama Judge Carolyn B. Tymkovich . Clinton / Pres. Matheson Jr.Nominated by Defendant. Ebel . Gorsuch . 2016 Candidates' Hillary Clinton Mr.Nominated by President George W.

was not going to be objected to by a ‘major party presidential Candidate’. Obama and Sen. and Sen. John McCain corralling the Republicans.S. Non-binding Resolution 511 were both Sen.S.S. Judy’s concerns based on the truth of his arguments and facts being passed over in the face of law and his simple request that those who have run against him in past races would have a motive to influence the Court in a silence rather than issue a Amicus Curiae in defense of the principles of ‘natural born Citizen’.Nominated by President Jimmy Carter Senior Judge Monroe G. Sen. McKay . Resolution that was non-binding that has three of the top major Candidates over the last three presidential election cycles involved in a quid pro quo to compromise the U. Senator voted for.3 The biggest motive or reason that the Court’s have not seen either Republican or Democratic Candidates for President show the duty and integrity Mr. with Sen. Seymour . That just trickled down hill to the 2012 elections as a snow job upon the public. Constitution. This is real political motivation away from the Constitution’s qualification demands. Clinton in on the deal that their Democratic nominee for 2008 and 2012. The recipient of the proceeds of the resolution was Sen. Judy has asked Hillary Clinton on her Twitter Account if she would consider writing amicus curiae to the Court based on witnesses of Mr. Hillary Clinton and Sen. John McCain. The co-sponsors of U. and every major Candidate winning the nomination of the major parties of the Republican and Democrats in 2008 were in on it. America’s only hope for saving the Constitution by and through someone who the Court’s recognize has standing and the MEDIA 28 . that every other Republican U. Sen. Judy that Chelsea Clinton was threatened after the assassination of President Clinton’s former friend and head of Arkansas Democrat Party Bill Gwatney and that President Bill Clinton had relayed to this witness that he knew Obama was not eligible and that they would release the information at the appropriate time. his second ACT of Congress in regards to his Citizenship and natural born Citizenship. Mr. Judy has with his standing was a little U.Nominated by President Jimmy Carter If discrimination was not taking place it’s difficult to assert Mr. Barack Obama.Senior Judge Stephanie K. who has usurped the Office of the President. Now.S.

his close friend and head of the Arkansas Democratic Party. the difference between “Citizen” and “Subject” or a time swap 29 . 128 Harv.S. L. on record first. no one does. 161. From that point on. A number of the Democrats she interviewed refused to appear on camera and told her that their lives and property had been threatened by people working with the Obama campaign.S. Before that could happen. clause 5 has not been ruled upon by the United States Supreme Court. the Clinton’s remained silent about Obama’s birth certificate or lack thereof.html While it may be a little sad the America only has one who has stood the test through hell and back of these two criteria. was Mr. Supreme Court.com/2015/02/i-cpac-2015-ignites-patriot-fires. These are facts. §XII ENUMERATIONS OF SCHOLASTIC PROFESSIONALS TO ABSORB NATURAL BORN CITIZEN INTO CITIZEN There is a growing consensus that should be addressed by the Court among many respected scholastic and political professionals now underway of the frame of mind that ‘natural born Citizen’ as it relates to Article II section 1. Bill Gwatney was murdered in his office and then someone told Bill that he was next if he said anything about Obama’s eligibility. Judy. They do not address equally however in their review. Senators and reserved for the Office of the President. In the video {linked here} below. She also heard former President Bill Clinton say that Obama was not eligible to be president because of his lack of birth records. In fact just 13 days ago USA TODAY printed an article entitled “Top Lawers: “No Question ‘Canadian-born Cruz eligible for presidency” citing a new Commentary March 11. 3 Reported at Godfatherpolitics. In fact.recognizes has not represented this principle as a discrimination against just Obama. Bill Clinton has often said that he would go public with the information when the time was right.2015 by two former Solicitor Generals’ Neal Katyal & Paul Clement published in the Harvard Law Review entitled “On the Meaning of “Natural Born Citizen”. and minus that and noting the extremely difficult pursuit of such an Appellee with standing to gain access to the U.S. with his action against McCain. she said it was common knowledge around many top Democrats.blogspot. that there is a freeway to liquidate the unique articulation unheard of in the qualifications for U. Representatives and the U.Rev F. it is better than not having one. Viviano says that she quickly became aware of just how dangerous and insidious the Obama campaign was. she said that Clinton was not intimidated until someone associated with the Obama campaign told him that his daughter Chelsea would be next if he opened his mouth. not aggrandized statements that have been exaggerated. [During the documentary process.] http://codyjudy.

born in Canada.cfm “Finally. Report at Politifact. That in a one world economic majesty.” http://blog. U. 30 .The Supreme Court’s silence “And that means a note of uncertainty remains”. jurisdiction. and place of birth is a poor surrogate for loyalty to one’s homeland in our increasingly mobile society and our ever more interconnected world. the natural born citizenship clause is both an anomaly and an anachronism.constitutioncenter.S. and U.” http://www. Rep.S. 2015 subsection.law. Sovereignty is dissolved as far as boundaries. as many legislators on both sides of the aisle have proposed over the years. The best solution would be to amend the Constitution. the United States Supreme Court along with the U. The way in which the clause differentiates among United States citizens is contrary to the overall spirit of the Constitution. eligible to run for president?” March 26th. the risk that foreign nobility will infiltrate our government is long past.org/2013/10/is-ted-cruz-a-natural-born-citizen-eligibleto-serve-as-president/ The effort is essentially a bully movement having no grounds in Congress or the Elected Leaders of the People and conceded by an astonishing dereliction of assumptions that no foreign nation or prince in the world would ever dream of actually wanting the United States of America. But absent a Supreme Court ruling or a constitutional amendment. They only want the first generation national disqualifier removed from the office of the President similar to failed Congressional attempts. of time and place.edu/2015-Spring/Professor-Sarah-Duggin- Discusses-US-Constitutions-Natural-Born-Citizenship-Requirement-on-NPR.S.S.S. Sen. Also quotes Professor Sarah Duggin reporting: “No. I think the better argument is that Senator Cruz is eligible to run for president and to serve as president of the United States. it is not open-and-shut.that merges the differing ages and time in the United States qualifications differing also with the three offices of U. as a means to seed a racy discrimination to qualification. Constitution and the U. and authority ostensibly seeding any distinction as contrary to the collaborative spirit of the Constitution. the clause should be narrowly interpreted. Pres. In the absence of an amendment. I don't think it's an open-and-shut case..com entitled “Is Ted Cruz.

Constitution?” The dereliction of the scholastic effort also concedes in a polarized political arena that the Court will only honor or acknowledge the two major parties of the Republicans and Democrats. in the business of amassing wealth and power of any population willing to give up its sovereignty. both must be given their own weight. The question reversed would ask. Who would want the vast wealth discovered and yet to be discovered in the United States of America? The consensus hinges on a real dereliction of enemies of the United States being vanquished and everybody loving everybody. This is a very dangerous concession under handing the will of the People to scholastic academia to encourage by ignoring this Petition for Writ of Certiorari. Clause 5 and where two terms cannot both serve a purpose called into question without excusing one or the other. 4 4 http://www.S. and the massive efforts to round up nuclear weapons. “It cannot be presumed that any clause in the 31 . Amendment XIV was never intended to replace U. U. According to a Gallup Poll in 2014 42% of Americans now recognize themselves as Independents. from old as well as new enemies. or Princes. The only problem with that is it is just not true.C. amass military assaults in the world against America and her population is a witness to it every day. The problem with that is all of the Independents in America are disenfranchised from justice in the Court. and have already denied eight times the mixing of terms in a dilution of the national security interest of natural born Citizen into Citizen.aspx In the absence of enforcement of the law of course a precedent is shaped and formed but this one seeking to altar the constitution by attrition uses a scholastic bully format irrespective of the People who elect Leaders to Congress.com/poll/166763/record-high-americans-identify- independents. Article II. Section 1. in the world wanting to take on such a calamity in spite of the worth of the United States of America being pennies on dollar of the national debt.S. “Why hasn’t every other nation conceded their sovereignty up.gallup. to be one of the United States under the U.The vacuum of power is left to naïve fools for anyone left to pick up the pieces and in the cringing hypothesis there are no dictators.S.C.

Supreme Court. and therefore such construction is inadmissible unless the words require it . justice for all Americans including those at the bottom like Mr. in the checks and balances of Justice.” Marbury v. Indeed he suffered incredibly harsh punishments at the hands of those who are Justices of the courts when the evidence 32 .S. Mr. No greater protection of this Court can be assumed but to keep America’s elections fair according to a standard of law. and the precedent case of the U. Code § 1401 . Scholastic winds constantly blow to and fro and the weight in this Republic should consistently be for the People. Supreme Court to weigh in and interpret what has not been defined in 8 U.S.S. If one man’s individual rights are not enough to stand up for than no man’s rights are safe in America. Judy has shown in this petition the reasons why he has filed this action being unfairly treated and discriminated against by the very Justice holders all the citizenry of America turn to for relief from this kind of treatment. 137 [p175] The simple fact is ‘natural born Citizen’ is the term used now as a qualification for President and ‘Citizen’ was the term used for those at the time of the adoption of this Constitution. He has shown the formation of an illegal Cartel of corporations nefariously involved in illegal activity that conspired. Madison 5 U. the Government’s own Record.S. and ultimately threw America’s elections and compromised the office of the President in a breach of national security threatening every American economically and militarily. X.Constitution is intended to be without effect. He has shown that using deductive reasoning. He has also shown in much respected circles of academics the call for the U. Judy has a right or claim to that delineation now as the law stands. §XIII SUMMARY TO THE QUESTIONS RAISED IN THIS APPEAL FOR CERIOARI TO BE GRANTED Mr. and what Congress has or has not passed. those of Congress. that is indeed judicially qualified as Constitutional.Nationals and citizens of United States at birth. that in fact ‘natural born Citizen’ is well defined as “Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents”. Judy.

air force.4 #18).4 #19) . It was in this suffering that Mr.S.S.” At times America needs civil heroes’. and while he has never been elected to U. “It is the losers in the election races all across our great land that differentiate America’s Republic under the U. navy. Not because of any outrageous act he’d done but because of his taking a stand against the unfair treatment of Native Americans to grow their hair out on their religious beliefs. Constitution as he learned the pains of life without the rights enumerated within it.S. So he suffered and suffered and suffered. Judy didn’t share the same belief but he didn’t waste his time either. Supreme Court to take up his case in 1996. Indeed Mr. Supreme Court (Appendix P2 USSC). The Justices of the United States Supreme Court have that chance to be those kinds of heroes in a simple duty to hear this case and grant this 33 . For without the losers in our Republic only a dictator remains. However he was told ‘not enough people suffer not having the evidence used against them given to them’ for the U. Mr. warriors willing to fight for the Individual’s Rights because there is a battle that the army. He saw a discrimination against male and female inmates and made the choice to take a stand suffering the penalty until the Court saw and heard the case acknowledging their persecution. Judy gained such an appreciation for our U. Senate he has run in 2004 and 2010 for it and became America’s first Presidential Candidate to witness under oath against another for ineligibility in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trail held in New York under the Tenth Amendment whose verdict from a panel of citizens across the United States was reached in Guilty. President he has run in 2008 and 2012 for it and consistently taken a stand for the principles of the Constitution’s qualifications for the Office of the President clear to the U.S. Indeed near four years of his 3018 days were in a 23 hour lock down 7 days a week in a single cell. and marines cannot fight or gun down.used against him was denied to him protecting those who framed him. While he has never been elected to Congress he has run in Utah’s first District Congressional race that was nationally recognized on Jon Stewart’s The Daily Show (Appendix p. an incredible abuse of the Constitution’s provisions. Judy celebrates America in ways few comprehend as he relates. that was delivered to all of Congress (Appendix P. while he has never been elected to the U.S.S. Constitution.

The many discussions which have taken place upon the construction of the constitution. a notary public personally appeared.2018 NOTOARY OF PUBLIC: In the county of Weber. Constitution: "In expounding the Constitution of the United States. and shown the high talent. for our Constitution. and the foresight of the illustrious men who framed it.S. DECLARATION of MAILING CERTIFICATE AFFADAVIT 34 . or ignored their opportunity as is the case here by the Appellee. Taney wrote in Holmes v. Cody Robert Judy. VIV. and appropriate meaning.S. and its force and effect to have been fully understood. it still comes down to Justice and the preservation of our Republic for which we all take a stand in the Order of the Court. for it is evident from the whole instrument. 2015. Every word appears to have been weighed with the utmost deliberation. hear this case and Grant this Writ of Certiorari. and for our Country’s sake. _/s/ Cody Robert Judy Witnessed: Kylie Allen Notary Public State of Utah Commission #678225 Commission Expires July 20th. Constitution is important and was drafted with the upmost care and concern but when all those arguments have been made and both sides have weighed in the scale of balance. /s/ Kylie Allen. Submitted and Signed this 30th Day of March. Of course the Justices have had every conceivable argument presented to them about how every single word of the U. State of Utah this 30 th Day of March. As Chief Justice Roger B. proved on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) (is/are) subscribed to this instrument and acknowledged (he/she/they) executed the same." Please. that no word was unnecessarily used.Writ of Certiorari. or needlessly added. every word must have its due force. the caution. have proved the correctness of this proposition. Jennison (1840) as to the importance of every word of the U. 2015.

S. N. §1746. IN THE 35 . a true and correct copy of the forgoing: 1. Mail and Email. .S. via 1 st class U.2018 NOTOARY OF PUBLIC: In the county of Weber. Washington DC 20543 meritsbriefs@supremecourt. 84103 The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington. a notary public personally appeared. Signature of Mailer /s/Cody Robert Judy Notary Seal Signature Witnessed: Kylie Allen Notary Public State of Utah Commission #678225 Commission Expires July 20th. Rule 29 (c) I do hereby declare under penalty of law that I mailed. reciting the facts and circumstances of service in accordance with U. Supreme Court 1 First Street N. Supreme Cr. E.S.gov On this 30th Day of March. State of Utah this 30 th Day of March.PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Postage pre-paid. 950 Pennsylvania Ave. proved on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) (is/are) subscribed to this instrument and acknowledged (he/she/they) executed the same. to the RESPONDENT(s). C. Cody Robert Judy. DC 20530-0001 U. 2015. 2015. DC 20500 And also: The Court & Solicitor General of the United States at: Solicitor General of the United States Department of Justice.W. by and through Counsel(s) of Record at: Respondent(s) Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro 825 North 300 West Suite C400 Salt Lake City. Washington.Notarized affidavit or declaration in compliance with 28 U..S. /s/ Kylie Allen. UT.

SUPREME COURT CASES REFERENCES A-Z pg.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Cody Robert Judy.3 6. al.U.OPINIONS ORDERS IN CONJUNCTION WITH JUDGEMENTS SOUGHT A-Z ORDERS PRECEED BY DATE 2.CRIMINAL INVESTIFATION REPORT pg.S.4 #10.FEDERAL AND STATE STATUTES RULES A-Z pg.1 .#11 8. v.. CONSTITUTION REFERENCE NUMERICAL ORDER pg. Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro et. Petitioner. 2 4.U.OTHER COURT CASE REFERENCES A-Z pg.3-5 7. Respondent(s) APPENDIX COVER PART APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX PAGE 1.S.2 3.OTHER MATERIAL NECESSARY TO UNDERSTAND THE CASE pg.6 36 pg. 2 5.NOTICE OF APPEAL pg.

2014. Oct. U.S.Judy v.al. 3rd. 16th. 27 th . and Phillips Judgments and Rulings Feb.. Obama et. 26th. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit 14-4136 Three Judge Court Honorable Justices Lucero. 1:14cv00093 Honorable Stewart from July 7th filing date: Judgments and Rulings on Aug.. 7th.APPENDIX Part 1. OPINIONS. District Court case No. al. Tymkovich.S. ORDERS IN CONJUNCTION WITH JUDGEMENT SOUGHT A-Z INCLUDING: 3- Judy v. 4. 2015 Feb. Obama et. Sep. U. 2015 FOLLOWING ORDER OF BY DATE 37 .

Stat 81.I . . 2.116. 11 Amendment XIX 8.S.C. I 4.U.S. L. 08A391 P. Code § 1401 .C. CONSTITUTIONAL REFERENCES NUMBERICAL ORDER 1.C. 8 U.4. Phil Berg v Obama et.S. Clause 5 iii. U. al No. Judy v. 17 U.2. Judy v.S.S. Obama U. Section 8. 107-155.C 12-5276 P.C. Sect. Amendment XIV 5. 4 2. Clause 10 2.10.S.C.11.S. 11 U. Amendment XX 7. 7. 11 Amendment XXIV U. 12 FEDERAL AND STATE STATUTE REFERENCES A-Z Page 1.Nationals and citizens of United States at birth (a-h) 6. U.S. Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 Pub.S. 8 U. No.15. 9. SUPREME COURT CASE REFERENCES A-Z 1. Art. I. Amendment XV 6. 3 U.S. Sect.113-14 § 403 (a) (3) 1 2. Hinckley et al.17 38 5. Supreme Court 96-7655 P.. 12 3. Article II.17 3 iii U.C.S.S. Article III.

A 1343 (3) 1 6. Obama et.S. Naturalization Act of 1790 was repealed by the Naturalization Act of 1795 9 9. U.. District Court case No. 1:14cv00093 9 Judy v.S.12 7.S. Hickley et alUtah’s Division 95cv952 P.2. U. 2:2008cv01162 NV District Crt 8 Judy v.S. 137 [p175 11 Minor v. 369 U.2 10. 42 §1983 iii.96-4045 P. McCain et.96-4045 6 Holmes v.C. al.S. Madison 5 U.S. Non-binding Resolution 511 12 OTHER COURT CASE REFERENCES A-Z 1 Coppedge v. 88 U. 438 (1962) Informa pauperis held in abeyance Cover Letter to Clerk 2 Judy v. §1251 ii 4. 28 U. Happersett. The Clayton Act 1914 ii..2.al.U.A 1331 1 5.C.S. 28 U. 28 U. Sen.S.C.3.12 17 iii. Hickley et alUtah’s Division 95cv952 5 Tenth Circuit Court. Jennison (1840) 7 Judy v.12 4 Judy v.S.2 8..3. Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 14-4136 10 Marbury v. 162 (1875) 12 12 19 12 1.12 1. al.S.C. Obama et. United States. OTHER MATERIAL NECESSARY TO UNDERSTAND THE CASE 39 .12 3 Tenth Circuit Court. 28 U. The Sherman Act 1890 ii.

there must be a valid reason for the lawsuit. In the United States. in which the party has standing because they directly will be harmed by the conditions for which they are asking the court for relief. The party is directly subject to an adverse effect by the statute or action in question. John Jay wrote to George Washington P.all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing2 P. and will dismiss the case without considering the merits of the claim of unconstitutionality.8 8 2011 Congressional Research Service report P.htm 40 . and the harm suffered will continue unless the court grants relief in the form of damages or a finding that the law either does not apply to the party or that the law is void or can be nullified.org/wiki/Standing_%28law%29 : In law.wikipedia.11 a.99 features eight attempts to change natural born Citizen clause of U.1 WND http://www. II. book 1 – Chapter XIX. the law might so adversely affect others that one might never know what was not done or created by those who fear they would become subject to the law – the so-called "chilling effects" doctrine. because while the plaintiff might not be directly affected.org/wiki/Natural-born-citizen_clause P. 4 Quote Edmund Burke .S. The Law of Nations.com/2009/williams091209.com/stories/2015/03/18/ready-obama-says-it-would-befun-to-amend-the-constitution-to-fix-campaign-finance/ ] 3 Standing Review http://en. section from 212 P. To have a court declare a law unconstitutional.com/2011/07/317705/#swdZcDI1CYKsQLI1. Clause 5 P. Section 1.wnd.wnd. In the United States. and the continued existence of the harm may affect others who might not be able to ask a court for relief. 1787. http://www. P.wikipedia. 3 2 Obama quoted Cleveland Ohio The Blaze: [ http://www. this is the grounds for asking for a law to be struck down as violating the First Amendment.8 7 Wiki definition of natural born Citizen cites: http://en.wnd. Otherwise. http://canadafreepress.com/2009/09/109363/ b.C. 4.8 6 Emer de Vattell’s international treatise on Natural Law.10 10 Nancy Pelosi signs two different forms to Certify Obama in 2008 P.9 9 WND http://www. standing or locus standi is the term for the ability of a party to demonstrate to the court sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support that party's participation in the case especially noticed in this particular case: 3. the court will rule that the plaintiff "lacks standing" to bring the suit. the current doctrine is that a person cannot bring a suit challenging the constitutionality of a law unless the plaintiff can demonstrate that he/she/it is or will "imminently" be harmed by the law. The party is not directly harmed by the conditions by which they are petitioning the court for relief but asks for it because the harm involved has some reasonable relation to their situation.com/2010/04/142101/ “Justice Clarence Thomas: We’re evading eligibility” pg. This is called the "something to lose" doctrine. Art.6 5 July 25.theblaze. The party suing must have something to lose in order to sue unless it has automatic standing by action of law.

From that point on. L. his close friend and head of the Arkansas Democratic Party. a law enforcement’s investigation showing identity fraud handed out by Obama on record to the White House Press Core in a phony or fabricated long form birth certificate.blogspot. 14 13 USA TODAY USA TODAY printed an article entitled “Top Lawers: “No Question ‘Canadian-born Cruz eligible for presidency” http://www.com entitled “Is Ted Cruz. she said it was common knowledge around many top Democrats. A number of the Democrats she interviewed refused to appear on camera and told her that their lives and property had been threatened by people working with the Obama campaign.google. and also elaborating on an invalid draft registration that had been fabricated.com/2015/02/i-cpac-2015-ignites-patriot-fires.12 a. I don't think it's an open-and-shut case. 128 Harv. [During the documentary process. the risk that foreign nobility will infiltrate our government is long past. Bill Gwatney was murdered in his office and then someone told Bill that he was next if he said anything about Obama’s eligibility. 15 Politifact.com/watch?v=z6Ngv16UQAA d. Alabama Supreme Court Affidavit of Mike Zullo https://docs.” http://www.com/document/d/1CLXGMmzWDSxZBCLNaFpo8Zge YFcXUvEuFRcS8IGf1GE/edit?pli=1 12 Reported at Godfatherpolitics. March 2011 P. and place of birth is a poor surrogate for loyalty to one’s homeland in 41 .] http://codyjudy. The way in which the clause differentiates among United States citizens is contrary to the overall spirit of the Constitution.mcsoccp.org/joomla/ c. https://www.com/story/news/politics/2013/11/26/ted-cruz-2016president-republican-nomination/2064395/ 14 Neal Katyal & Paul Clement published in the Harvard Law Review entitled “On the Meaning of “Natural Born Citizen”. Viviano says that she quickly became aware of just how dangerous and insidious the Obama campaign was.html P. she said that Clinton was not intimidated until someone associated with the Obama campaign told him that his daughter Chelsea would be next if he opened his mouth. eligible to run for president?” March 26th.com/lgs/2014/04/13/breaking-thelatest-update-from-arpaio%E2%80%99s-cold-case-posse/ b.usatoday. Bill Clinton has often said that he would go public with the information when the time was right.law. 2.The Supreme Court’s silence “And that means a note of uncertainty remains” http://www. it is not open-and-shut. In the video {linked here} below. 2015 subsection. In fact. Link: http://www.thelastgreatstand. 15 17 Sarah Duggin Quote:“Finally.politifact.cfm P.11 Cold Case Posse of Sheriff Joe Arpaio.15 16 Sarah Duggin Quote: “No. the Clinton’s remained silent about Obama’s birth certificate or lack thereof.edu/2015-Spring/Professor-Sarah-Duggin-Discusses-USConstitutions-Natural-Born-Citizenship-Requirement-on-NPR. Before that could happen.com/truth-ometer/article/2015/mar/26/ted-cruz-born-canada-eligible-run-presidentupdate/ P.youtube. http://www. She also heard former President Bill Clinton say that Obama was not eligible to be president because of his lack of birth records. I think the better argument is that Senator Cruz is eligible to run for president and to serve as president of the United States. But absent a Supreme Court ruling or a constitutional amendment. the natural born citizenship clause is both an anomaly and an anachronism. 161.Rev F. born in Canada.

com/collections/2682941/The-Official-C-I-AColumbia-Obama-Sedition-and-Treason-Trial-Transcripts 21 Cody Robert Judy Quote: Mr.org/2013/10/is-ted-cruz-a-natural-born-citizeneligible-to-serve-as-president/ P. The best solution would be to amend the Constitution. and the foresight of the illustrious men who framed it. every word must have its due force. and appropriate meaning.” P." P.com/videos/ybem0d/putting-the-con-back-in-congress 20 The official CIA COLUMBIA Obama sedition and treason trial transcripts Scribd: https://www. http://www.constitutioncenter.aspx P.” http://blog. and its force and effect to have been fully understood.16 19 The Daily Show w Jon Stewart ‘Putting the Con back in Congress’ http://thedailyshow. that no word was unnecessarily used. or needlessly added. Constitution: "In expounding the Constitution of the United States. Every word appears to have been weighed with the utmost deliberation. for it is evident from the whole instrument. the clause should be narrowly interpreted. Judy celebrates America in ways few comprehend as he relates. and shown the high talent. have proved the correctness of this proposition. The many discussions which have taken place upon the construction of the constitution.18 22 As Chief Justice Roger B.gallup. the caution. 19 42 .com/poll/166763/record-high-americansidentify-independents.our increasingly mobile society and our ever more interconnected world.15 18 Gallup Poll in 2014 42% of Americans now recognize themselves as Independents. “It is the losers in the election races all across our great land that differentiate America’s Republic under the U. Jennison (1840) as to the importance of every word of the U. Constitution.S. In the absence of an amendment.S.cc. as many legislators on both sides of the aisle have proposed over the years. Taney wrote in Holmes v.scribd. For without the losers in our Republic only a dictator remains.

NOTICE OF APPEAL 43 .