Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(a) (b)
(d)
2004-05 2005-06
2002-03 2003-04
(Projected) (Projected)
The analyst estimates that the appropriate leading P/E1 multiplier for the stock to be 14 and the required rate of
return on PCDS (partly convertible debenture) is around 12% p.a compounded semi-annually.
You are required to
a. Calculate the intrinsic value of the PCD using the estimates prepared by the analyst and the other data. State
the assumptions underlying your calculation.
b. Calculate the conversion value of stock under Part A of PCD assuming that your required rate of return is 17%
Po b
=
E ke − g
p.a .You believe that an indicative P/E1 is defined as P/E1 = 1 Where, b = average payout ratio, ke =
required rate of return, g = sustainable growth rate, is more appropriate for valuing equity shares made
available on conversion.
(6 + 4 = 10 marks) < Answer >
2. During the year 2003-04, three companies Polar Software Ltd., Sonata Airways and Time Auto Ltd. have
announced higher dividends on December 31, 2003. A financial analyst working in a brokerage firm wanted to test
the consistency of the semi-strong form of market efficiency. He estimated the characteristic lines for a period of 4
years on a monthly basis upto September 30, 2003. The relationship between the returns on these three companies
and the market index are represented by following equations.
rP,t = 1.50% + 0.75rmt
rS,t = 1.26% + 1.15 rmt
rt,t = 1.98% + 1.35 rmt
Where rP,t rS,t and rt,t are the returns of Polar Software, Sonata Airways and Time Auto during period t and rm,t is
return of the market index during the same period. The following data pertains to the returns of the companies and
market for the period 3 months before and 3 months after the dividend was declared.
Using event studies approach you are required to verify the validity of semi-strong form of market efficiency in the
Indian stock market.
(8 marks) < Answer >
3. Suppose the assumptions of CAPM are valid and unlimited borrowing and lending at risk-less rate of interest is
possible. You are required to determine the unknown quantities in the following table.
END OF SECTION B
END OF SECTION C
Suggested Answers
Security Analysis – I (211) : April 2004
Section A : Basic Concepts
β i2
Var (Ri) = Var (Rm) + Var (ei)
i.e., Total Risk of security i = Systematic Risk + Unsystematic Risk.
(1 − 0.70)1.09 0.327
0.125 − 0.09
= = 0.035 = 9.34
19. Answer : (b) < TOP
>
D 0 [ (1 + g n ) + H (g a − g n )]
r − gn
Reason : According to H-model P0 =
D 0 (1 + g n ) D0 H (ga − gn )
+
r − gn r − gn
=
= Value based on normal growth rate + Premium due to abnormal growth rate
D 0 H (g a − g n ) 3.00 x 3 x (0.8 − 0.04) 9 x 0.04
r − gn 0.125 − 0.4
= = 0.085 = Rs.4.235.
20. Answer : (e) < TOP
Reason : Futures margin depend on the price volatility of the underlying asset. Exchanges generally set >
this margin equal to µ + 3 σ then µ is the average daily absolute change in the value of
contract and σ is standard deviation of these changes over a period of time. Hence only (I) and
(III) are correct and therefore (e) is the answer.
δr δr 2
i.e.
For a normal level of return of 10 – 12% range, utility function given in option (a) only satisfies
the above criteria.
The lowest price of the period after the gap is lower than the highest price of the preceding
period is false regarding gaps.
A series of runaway gaps is an indication of exhaustion gap is true.
The highest price of the period after the gap is lower than the lowest price of the preceding
period is true.
Hence the option (d) is the correct answer.
Hence the other options (a),(b),(c) and (e) are incorrect.
Section B : Problems
1. a. We will work half year as the unit of time
PV (Part A) = 100X(0.10/2) X PVIFA (6,2) + (Estimated MV of the Share) X PVIF(6,2)
Estimated Market value of the stock on 1.2.2005 = Projected EPS for 2005-06 × Appropriate PE
= 21.22 /0.834 × 14
= Rs. 356.21
PV (Part A) = 5 × 1.8334 + 356.21 × 0.89 = Rs. 326.2
PV (Part B) = 100X(0.10/2) × PVIFA (6,8) + 50X PVIF(6,8)
+ 50 × (0.10/2) × PVIFA (6,2) × PVIF(6,8) + 50X PVIF(6,10)
= 5 × 6.21 + 50 × 0.627 + 2.5 × 1.8334 × 0.627 + 50 × 0.558
= 31.05 + 31.35 + 2.874 + 27.9
= Rs. 93.174
PV (Part A + Part B) = 356.21 + 93.174 = Rs449.384
b. The payout ratio and the long run sustainable growth rate for computing the indicative P/E have been
determined by averaging the relevant data provided in the table:
Sum of Equity dividends
Sum of Equity earnings
Average Payout =
(1.05 + 1.13 +2.10 +3.88 ) 8.16
(6.63 +8.40 +15.99 +21.22) 52.24
= = = 0.156
Estimated retention ratio = 1 – 0.156 = 0.844
Sum of Equity Earnings
Average ROE = Sum of Net Worth
(6.63 + 8.40+15.99 +21.22) 52.24
(23.13+ 40.41 +98.94 +128.94) 291.42 = 0.179
=
Estimated Sustainable growth rate = 0.179 X 0.844 = 0.151
Indicative P/E = 0.156/(0.17 –0.151) = 8.21
Conversion value = Projected EPS for 2005-06 X Indicative PE
= 21.22 /0.834 X 8.21
= Rs. 208.89
< TOP >
2. First we should find out abnormal return by deducting the actual return from the expected return
Polar Software Limited
Period Actual return Market return Expected return Abnormal return
(r Pt) (rmt) (%) (1.50 + 0.75 rmt)
3 9.75 9.85 8.8875 0.8625
2 9.85 9.95 8.9625 0.8875
1 10.25 10.05 9.0375 1.2125
0 10.45 10.25 9.1875 1.2625
1 10.75 10.45 9.3375 1.4125
2 11.25 11.25 9.9375 1.3125
3 10.85 11.45 10.088 0.7625
Sonata Airways
Actual Market
Period Expected return Abnormal return
return return
(rSt) (rmt) (%) (1.26 + 1.15 (rmt)
3 12.45 9.85 12.5875 -0.1375
2 12.35 9.95 12.7025 -0.3525
1 12.85 10.05 12.8175 0.0325
0 13.45 10.25 13.0475 0.4025
1 13.38 10.45 13.2775 0.1025
2 14.25 11.25 14.1975 0.0525
3 14.15 11.45 14.4275 -0.2775
Time Auto
Period Actual return Market return Expected return Abnormal return
(rT,t) (rmt) (1.98 + 1.35 rmt)
3 14.58 9.85 15.2775 0.6975
2 14.85 9.95 15.4125 0.5625
1 15.35 10.05 15.5475 0.1975
0 15.78 10.25 15.8175 0.0375
1 16.15 10.45 16.0875 -0.0625
2 17.35 11.25 17.1675 -0.1825
3 17.95 11.45 17.4375 -0.5125
We will now estimate the average abnormal return to each of the months before and after the dividend was announced
Third month before the announcement of dividend
1
AAR(–3) = 3 (0.8625 – 0.1375+ 0.6975) = 1.4225
Second month before the announcement of dividend
1
AAR(–2) = 3 (0.8875- 0.3525 +0.5625) = 1.0975
First month before the announcement of dividend
1
AAR(–1) = 3 (1.2125 + 0.0325+0.1975) = 1.4425
Month during which the dividend was announced
1
AAR (0) = 3 (1.2625+0.4025 + 0.0375) = 1.7025
First month after the announcement of dividend
1
AAR(1) = 3 (1.4125 + 0.1025 – 0.0625) = 1.4525
Second month after the announcement of dividend
1
AAR(2) = 3 (1.3125 + 0.0525-0.1825) = 1.1825
Third month after the announcement of dividend
1
AAR (3) = 3 (0.7625 - 0.2775 –0.5125) = -0.0275
Now we will compute the cumulative Average Abnormal returns for the period of three months before and after the
announcement of dividend.
CAAR = (1.4225 + 1.0975 + 1.4425 + 1.7025 + 1.4525+1.1825 + -0.0275) = 8.2725%.
As the value of CAAR is not close to zero, we conclude that market is not efficient in the semi-strong form.
< TOP >
3. According to CAPM
= Rf + β (Rm – Rf)
= Rf + β S (Rm – Rf) - (I)
= Rf + β D (Rm – Rf) - (II)
(I) – (II)
– RD = (β S – β D) (Rm – Rf)
= (1.52 – 0.80) (Rm – Rf)
= 0.72 (Rm – Rf)
3
0.72 = 4.167 = (Rm – Rf)
Now putting the value of (Rm – Rf) in equation (I)
= Rf + 1.52 × 4.167
= 12 – 6.333 = 5.667%
= 5.667 + 0.96 × 4.167 = 9.667
= 9.667%.
Total risk = Systematic risk + Unsystematic risk
= β σ + σ eC
2
C
2
2
m
βc2 σ m2 + 9
=
(0.96)2 σm + 9
2
=
0.9216 σm
2
(64 – 9) =
55
0.9216 = σ2m
59.68 = σ2m
3924.245
Duration of Floating rate bond = 949.752 = 4.13 years
< TOP >
5. The historical and expected dividend payout ratios are equal for both the companies
For Company A
According to Dividend discount model
D1
ke − g
PO = Where the symbols are in standard use.
Dividing both sides by E1
Po (D1 / E1 ) D1
⇒ = = DPR
E1 ke − g E1
where
ke = 5.25+1.35 (11.50 – 5.25)
= 5.25 + 11.2
= 13.6875
Growth = ROE × retention ratio
= 0.16 × 0.60
= 0.096
Therefore,
0.4 0.4
P/E ratio = 0.136875 − 0.096 = 0.040875 = 9.786
For Company B
Dividing both sides by E1
Po (D 0 / E1 ) D1
⇒ = = DPR
E1 ke − g E1
where
ke = 5.25 + 1.05 (11.5-5.25)
= 11.8125
g = 0.11 × 0.50 = 0.055
0.5
P/E ratio = 0.118125 − 0.055
= 7.92
Alternative method:
The P/E ratio estimated above uses the forecasted EPS for the next period, which is called leading P/E ratio.
Alternatively, P/E ratio can be estimated using the current (latest available) EPS. This is called trailing P/E
ratio:
For company A
Trailing P/E ratio :
Dividing both sides by Eo
D0
(1 + g)
Po E D0
⇒ = 0 = DPR
Eo ke − g E0
Where
ke = 5.25+1.35 (11.50 – 5.25)
= 5.25 + 11.2
= 13.6875
Growth = ROE × retention ratio
= 0.16 × 0.60
= 0.096
Po 0.4(1 + 0.096)
Eo 0.136875 − 0.096
Trailing =
0.4384
= 0.040875
= 10.725
For company B
Trailing P/E ratio :
D0
(1 + g)
Po E0 D0
⇒ = = DPR
Eo Ke − g E0
where
ke = 5.25 + 1.05 (11.5-5.25)
= 11.8125
g = 0.11 × 0.50 = 0.055
0.5(1.055)
Trailing P/E ratio : 0.118125 − 0.055
= 8.3556
b. The possible reasons for the difference in the PE ratios of the two companies are
(i) Difference in the payout ratios
(ii) Difference in the ROE
(iii) Difference in the Beta values
(i) (iv) Difference in growth rates
c. Calculation of long-term growth rate when the company B’s stock is trading at sixteen times its next
expected earnings.
DPR
ke− g
12 =
0.5
0.118125 − g
12 =
⇒ 1.4175 – 12g = 0.5
⇒ 12g = 0.9175
⇒ g = 7.65%.
< TOP >
6.
100
1 + RS
RSI = 100 –
Average of up closing prices
Average of down closing prices
RS =