This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Written by DTYarbrough
A FEW OF MY THOUGHTS
Copyright 2010 All rights reserved
HOW I REALLY FEEL ABOUT RELATIVITY
Written by DTYarbrough
Relativity and special relativity set a new standard for stupidity. Of course they have been topped by Quantum Physicists and others building upon those theories. Here are a few examples. Light beams in a vacumn can approach an object from all directions, each traveling at the speed of light (c). Yet they can only approach each other at a combined speed of (c). That's not strange, it's stupid and impossible. Light speed is constant for all viewers, regardless of their frame of reference. WRONG. Take for example a high speed centrifuge with a transmitter and reciever mounted within the passenger cabin. While it is stationary, the transmitter is activated and the receiver records the time taken for the pulse to reach it. With the centrifuge at full speed, the test is repeated, with the exact same results. Since the reciever moved a short distance, almost immeasureable, the light had to travel farther in the same amount of time. I say that the extra speed was the motion of the medium the light traveled through. Relativity says that movement off the meduim can not be added to the lights speed. WRONG again. So they used this experiment to prove time dilation. STUPID. Simply reorient the transmitter and reciever and the light moves slower or the effect on time is reversed. Which makes more sense to you? There are many such examples of proofs of time dilation. They are either misinterpretation of test results or cases of the scientists not even looking for the real cause. You can't blame them since thay have been taught that it doesn't have to make sense. Mass causes gravity by warping space. In the example used to demonstrate this, a bowling ball in placed on a sheet of rubber. The mass of the bowling ball causes a dimple in the sheet and when you roll another object across the sheet, it is drawn into this dimple. Space is not one dimensional. Try to visualize this in three dimensions. You quantum physicists can use four or five dimensions if you wish. It seems to me that the object would be diverted around a massive object, rather than sucked in. Atomic clocks slow down at higher speeds and Muons decay
slower when moving faster. While this is probably true, it has nothing to do with time dilation. Here are some alternative explanations. (1) The increased mass due to speed slows the radioactive decay. (2) My theory of Conservation of Energy in Sub-atomic Particles may also apply to atomic particles (spin versus speed). The reduction in spin may slow the radioactive decay.(3) Movement relative to the Earth's magnetic fields may have some effect. In a muon experiment I read about, 47,000 out of 1,000,000 reached the earth before they decayed. What about the other 953,000. You would think radioactive decay would be consistant if time were the only factor and their speeds were consistant. Photons travel at the speed of light but do not exibit high mass when they strike another object. If this mass can exibitit the other properties of normal mass(attraction by a black holes gravity) then why doesn't it hit us with massive force. If the mass is due to velocity and magically vanishes when it collides and stops, then why can't it get back out of the black hole when it slows and loses its mass?
MORE TO COME