"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws" Meyer Rothschild The Rothschilds

, descendants of my great great great grandfather, Meyer Amschel Rothschild, and their agents planned three world wars, and executed two world wars.
"If my sons did not want wars, there would be none." --Gutle Schnapper, Mayer Amschel Rothschild's wife

They can be tied to the planning of WWIII as well, which was to begin at the end of 1998 and reach its conclusion by January 1, 2000. (1998 equals three times 666 - a key number for satanists.)
Albert Pike and Three World Wars Albert Pike received a vision, which he described in a letter that he wrote to Mazzini, dated August 15, 1871. This letter graphically outlined plans for three world wars that were seen as necessary to bring about the One World Order, and we can marvel at how accurately it has predicted events that have already taken place. http://www.threeworldwars.com/albert-pike2.htm After Mazzini's death on March 11, 1872, Pike appointed Adriano Lemmi (1822-1896, 33rd degree Mason), a banker from Florence, Italy, to run their subversive activities in Europe. Lemmi was a supporter of patriot and revolutionary Giuseppe Garibaldi, and may have been active in the Luciferian Society founded by Pike. Lemmi, in turn, was succeeded by Lenin and Trotsky, then by Stalin. The revolutionary activities of all these men were financed by British, French, German, and American international bankers; all of them dominated by the House of Rothschild. http://www.threeworldwars.com/albert-pike.htm General Albert Pike and World War III SNIP Pike's plan was ingeniously simple. The inherent antagonism between different ideologies was to be stirred up and made to explode in three world wars and three revolutions. The first world war was to destroy the three European empires, at that time being the last remaining bulwarks against Illuminism. One of these (Russia) Was to be made a centre of atheist totalitarianism (Communism). The second world war was to erupt from heightened tensions between the Jewish race (and its spiteful Zionism) and extreme European nationalism (Nazism and Fascism). This war would weaken Europe economically and politically and Communism would expand and become as strong as all Christendom, but not stronger, until the time was up for the final destruction of society. A third reason the second world war was to create a Jewish state in Palestine. Gradually it would be possible to thereby heighten the tensions between Judaism and Islam until they broke out in a war which would bring in all of the world powers. The three revolutions, which would aid this carefully planned dissolution of all human civilisation... http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=1068 Section 4 Page 1

Most people did not realize that the Rothschild were Satanic. They have hidden behind the mask of Jewishness. Understanding the concept of a false person hiding behind a true mask is essential to understanding the condition of the world today. Using the wolf in sheep’s clothing analogy to fool the masses is very much a strategy of war. This is a Biblical reference to the Rothschilds:
Re 2:9 -I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.

The Rothschilds have a history of hiding their bloodline under other names, and using their relatives in their plots.
Conspiracy Too Monstrous To Conceive "The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists." J. Edgar Hoover http://www.savethemales.ca/000166.html

The Rothschilds planned the French Revolution and three world wars using agents like Weishaupt, Lenin, Marx, Stalin and Hitler. Both Stalin and Hitler were Rothschild descendants. In their planned wars Rothschilds almost always controlled both sides of the conflict so they could manipulate the outcome. The plan for world domination was passed on from generation to generation.
“Adolph Hitler was born in 1889 on the German-Austrian border in the Austrian border town of Brannau-on-the-Inn. Brannau is situated on the Inn River midway between Munich and Linz. A key border crossing between Germany and Austria, Brannau is the gateway for travel between Munich and Vienna. Travel from Frankfurt to Vienna through Munich couriers would enter Austria at the Brannau crossing. Why was Adolph Hitler born in Brannau? At the time of his birth, his father, Alois, was the chief customs official at the Brannau border crossing. This fact is quite curious as there is strong evidence that Hitler's father was the illegitimate son of Baron Salomon Mayer Rothschild, head of the Rothschild family's Vienna branch.” http://www.geocities.com/cliff_shack/TheSignificanceOfHitlersBirthplace.html Was Stalin a Rothschild? SNIP “So which Rothschild may have fathered Stalin? Edmond de Rothschild of the Paris branch of the Rothschild bank is,IMHO, the most plausible candidate. Edmond, the youngest son of James (Yakov) de Rothschild was the go to guy when it came to globetrotting. He did much of the legwork for the French Rothschilds who ran the family's oil business. Edmond travelled the sea in style in the latest ocean-going yacht of his day.” Section 4 Page 2

http://www.geocities.com/cliff_shack/stalinrothschild.html

(German Chancellor Angela Merkel is also a Rothschild. She is Hitler’s daughter.)
Meet the Real Adolf Hitler!! Hitler was a Rothschild!! http://www.reformation.org/adolf-hitler.html Daughter Of Adolph Hitler Vows To Complete European Union By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

It is with troubling concern that we report today that the Western Nations have announced this week that the ancient German city of Meerholz, Germany has now become the ‘Heart’ of the European Union with the inclusion of the former Soviet block nations of Bulgaria and Romania. The symbolism of this ancient citadel, founded in 1170 by the German Emperor Frederick Barbarossa (who was also crowned the Holy Roman Emperor in 1155, and who has been known throughout history as Barbarossa) now being the ‘Heart’ of Europe cannot be lost upon our World of today, particularly when viewed in the light of the German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s vow today to unite all of Europe under one single constitution, which in effect would wipe out the National Sovereignty of all the countries in the European Union. This vow being made by Angela Merkel to unite the European Continent under one flag cannot be ignored, especially when viewed in the light of still secret, but ‘obtainable’, Soviet KGB archive files which present a terrifying portrait of the present German Chancellor as being the daughter of the former German Nazi Leader, Adolf Hitler. Though said to be born on July 17, 1954 in the former Soviet controlled German Democratic Republic (East Germany), Angela Merkel’s Stasi GDR file (currently still held in the Soviet KGB archives) states that she was instead born on April 20, 1954, the birth date of her ‘true’ father, Adolph Hitler who was born on April 20, 1889. http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index973.htm

World War I The Rothschilds manipulated the outcome of WWI, and in doing so murdered 66 million - mainly Christians - in Russia as sacrifices to Satan.
“The largest number of victims, Solzhenitsyn reports, were Christian believers, understandable since the revolutionary Jews despised and hated Jesus and His Chosen People, the Christians. All-in-all, about 66 million innocent people were kidnapped and eventually died a hideous death at the hands of the Jewish "Ivan the Terrible" corps.” http://www.conspiracyworld.com/index0091.htm

Human sacrifice is still very much part of the agenda. The sacrifices are not limited to “Satanic Holy Days,”but are committed every day of the year around the world. Most of the serial killings and mass murders are Illuminati Satanic sacrifices using Illuminati mind control.
Section 4 Page 3

The House of Rothschild The Satanic vision for the New World Order could never have been realized had it not been for the immense wealth of the Rothschild Family. --Satan's Altar is highly significant. Human sacrifice is required on this altar, as are abominations against God of every conceivable stripe. Satanic Sabbaths (Eight Holy Days per year, each of which requires human sacrifice) http://www.cuttingedge.org/pages/seminar2/SEAL8.htm 3. People must die as human sacrifices, especially children, since Lord Satan looks upon a younger human sacrifice as his most desirable http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/cienciareal/cienciareal20.htm

Last century alone they were responsible for the deaths of over one hundred million people through Communism, an invention of Rothschild agent, Karl Marx.
DEMOCIDE: MURDER BY GOVERNMENT Governments have murdered hundreds of millions of their citizens and those under their control. http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/MURDER.HTM ...the new world total: old total 1900-1999 = 174,000,000. New World total = 174,000,000 + 38,000,000 (new for China) + 50,000,000 (new for Colonies) = 262,000,000. Just to give perspective on this incredible murder by government, if all these bodies were laid head to toe, with the average height being 5', then they would circle the earth ten times. http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/20TH.HTM

They are of the belief that they gain satanic power by offering blood sacrifices to Satan. When they are feeling a loss of power, they step up the bloodshed. (Americans are naive to believe their government does not participate in these satanic sacrifices or democide, and it is time for all Americans to awaken to the reality of what America has become.) The Rothschild motive for World War II was to recreate Israel for their own Satanic purposes world domination.
Rothschild The Israeli Supreme Court Building And The New World Order http://www.gnosticliberationfront.com/rothschild__the_israeli_supreme.htm Israel Supreme Court & Illuminati. P.1 Section 4 Page 4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17CRVGojwic Rothschild-Israeli Connection http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/roth-israel.html

THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT WORLD WAR II
'Most people, sometime in their lives, stumble across truth. Most jump up, brush themselves off, and hurry on about their business as if nothing had happened." -- Winston Churchill

The true story behind the world wars is a web of intrigue laced with incest, adultery, illegitimacy, homosexuality jealousy, treason, pedophilia, hatred, rage, insanity and mass murder. Unfortunately some nobodies have tried to interject themselves into this saga due to the inferiority, insanity, and sado-masochism of the latter self-centered spoiled generation Rothschilds who cannot comprehend that they cannot have everything they so desire. The world has been told World War II is over, but yet it is not a fait accompli.
Germany Still In Juridicial Limbo By Christopher Bollyn 12-15-5 POTSDAM, Germany - The Allied occupation of Germany began 58 years ago this month and in the eyes of many Germans has not yet ended. Foreign armies are still based on German soil and Europe's largest and most prosperous "democracy" still lacks a constitution and a peace treaty putting a formal end to the Second World War. The reunified German nation, considered a modern European democracy, has no constitution other than the temporary Basic Law (Grundgesetz) originally written in 1948, under the guidance of the U.S. military occupation forces and originally meant only to apply to the western parts of Germany under U.S. control. http://www.rense.com/general69/germany.htm

Hitler did not commit suicide after World War II, but escaped.
The World was Lied to about Hitler's Death 'Identity Theft' must be carried out before an impostor can use the name of another person to commit fraud As the Third Reich collapsed in the spring of 1945, the Russians were the first to enter Berlin and capture Adolf Hitler's bunker. Then, the Soviet Union made a series of contradictory statements or lies concerning Hitler's death. Stalin announced to Truman during lunch in Potsdam on July 17, that Hitler did not commit suicide but had probably escaped. After that, the Russians released photographs of what they claimed to be Hitler's corpse on a dingy floor. http://www.blackraiser.com/nredoubt/identity.htm HITLER ESCAPED! Section 4 Page 5

I remember hearing, in the 1950s, rumors that Hitler had escaped to a secret Nazi base at the South Pole. In 1952, Dwight D. Eisenhower said: "We have been unable to unearth one bit of tangible evidence of Hitler's death. Many people believe that Hitler escaped from Berlin." When President Truman asked Joseph Stalin at the Potsdam conference in 1945 whether or not Hitler was dead, Stalin replied bluntly, 'No.' http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/omegafile18.htm

According to letters The Kennedy-Khrushchev Letters, edited by Thomas Fensch, U.S.S.R. Chairman Nikita Khrushchev and United States President John F. Kennedy, the exchanged correspondence which revealed that they wanted to bring a finality to WWII. This, in essence, was admitting there had been no solution to the Nazi aggression. In relation to world peace, Kennedy placed great emphasis is placed on "a special responsibility at this time rests upon the Soviet Union and the United States." Khrushchev to Kennedy:
•"...the question of Germany should be solved in such a way that the prestige of any of our countries was not hurt" (pg. 89) •"The Soviet Union proceeds from the necessity to find such a solution which would not cause damage to either side; we must solve this whole problem amicably and, having solved it, not collide with each other in the future. In short, it is necessary to untie knots which create frictions between our states." 3/10/62 (pp. 219-220) •"The policies which the Western powers continue to stick to might somehow have been understood in the times when it was originated. That is a policy of diktat, a policy 'from the position of strength'. The late Dulles did not make bones about it. But one wants to conduct this policy even now ignoring the enormous changes that have taken place in the world." Undated (pg. 151) •"And of course, Mr. President, I am again reminding you of the necessity to solve the German question because the next crisis, possibly of no lesser danger, can be caused by the German question." 10/30/62 (pg. 351) •"The signing of a German peace treaty would help to liquidate the state of 'cold war," ...11/9/61 (pg. 90) •"The peace treaty should fix the situation which really exists, should not allow to upset the established balance and should secure stable peace and tranquility in Europe and not only in Europe." 3/10/62 (pg. 220) •"I would not like to leave anything unclear - one way or another we will sign a German peace treaty." 3/10/62 (pg. 223) •"The Soviet Union intends to conclude a German peace treaty." 3/10/62 (pg. 224) •"The Hitlerite Germany lost the war with all the ensuing consequences. Its plans to expand "Lebensraum" at the expense of other states ended in failure. This should be recognized once and for all. In fact, that is what the United States, Britain, France, the Soviet Union and other Section 4 Page 6

countries fought for against the Hitlerite Germany. Why then should you and we now reckon with the revanchist strivings of the FRG and even encourage them delaying indefinitely the conclusion of a German peace treaty and preserving the present indefinite situation, fraught with danger? After all it is the absence of a peace treaty that feeds the hopes of aggressive revanchist circles in West Germany for a possibility to revise the results of World War II." 9/28/62 (pg. 284) •"fate of mankind is at stake, we as statesmen must use all opportunities to justify the great trust placed upon us." (pg. 229-230)

Why would these two world leaders be speaking about signing a final peace negotiation if a final conclusion had been reached? The reason World War II is not over in terms of treaties, is because Hitler won - NOT England. The Mountbattens and Hitler’s masochistic egomaniac Rothschild cousins did not want to accept defeat. I realize that on the surface, it appears that England and the Allies won the war, and Hitler and the Germany lost the war, but that is because the public does not know what was at the root of the war. The public was fed propaganda for the reasons they went to war, and the world was fed propaganda for how the war ended. No final papers for World War II have been drawn up because the reasons that were given to the public were false ones. If England had truly been victorious in their own eyes, they would have rushed to finalize the treaties of World War II. They have not because they planned to keep the war going until they were satisfied - which will never happen. As you can see, important facts were left out of WWII history. World War II was a family feud, and the crown of the United Kingdom was a central issue. There are other subplots not commonly known to the public, and then there are many elements of the reality of the events leading up to World War II which have been purged from public accounts. The truth was documented in the fiction piece, 1984:
At this moment, for example, in 1984 (if it was 1984), Oceania was at war with Eurasia and in alliance with Eastasia. In no public or private utterance was it ever admitted that the three powers had at any time been grouped along different lines. Actually, as Winston well knew, it was only four years since Oceania had been at war with Eastasia and in alliance with Eurasia. But that was merely a piece of furtive knowledge which he happened to possess because his memory was not satisfactorily under control. Officially the change of partners had never happened. Oceania was at war with Eurasia: therefore Oceania had always been at war with Eurasia. The enemy of the moment always represented absolute evil, and it followed that any past or future agreement with him was impossible. . The Party said that Oceania had never been in alliance with Eurasia. He, Winston Smith, knew that Oceania had been in alliance with Eurasia as short a time as four years ago. But where did that knowledge exist? Only in his own consciousness, which in any case must soon be annihilated. And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed -if all records told the same tale -- then the lie passed into history and became truth. 'Who controls the past,' ran the Party slogan, 'controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.' And yet the past, though of its nature alterable, never had been altered. Whatever was true now was true from everlasting to everlasting. It was quite simple. All that was needed was an unending series of victories over your own memory. 'Reality control', they called it: in Newspeak, 'doublethink' 1984 by George Orwell; pp. 23-24

When all facts - not the myths - are accurately presented, Hitler’s actions were much more reasonable, and the “interpretation” of what transpired during the Holocaust takes on a new dimension.
Section 4 Page 7

HOLOCAUST DENIAL WORKS TWO WAYS The issue of the Holocaust immediately brings up an emotional response. As the Nazis learned, people who are whipped up into emotions, fail to use their reasoning. There is science to support this concept. The brain is divided into two halves. The right brain contains emotions. The left brain contains logic. It is possible to shut down the ability to reason if a crowd is whipped into an emotional frenzy. War is ugly, but it is ugly on all sides. Torture, human experimentation occurred on both sides. If anyone has doubts about this, research what America is doing today to its prisoners. Hitler “murdered” six million Jews. Churchill and Eisenhower starved to death 7-8 million surrendered Germans in peace time. If Hitler is the “devil” because he murdered six million Jews, why are not the British and Americans devils for murdering 7-8 surrendered Germans in peace time? Why are they not shunned?
Mass Starvation of Germans, 1945-1950 Crimes and Mercies cover In 1997 James Bacque published his Crimes and Mercies, which showed that more than nine million Germans (mostly civilians) died as a result of Allied starvation and expulsion policies in the first five years after World War II. These deaths were not accidental, but were the result of deliberately genocidal policies instituted by Dwight Eisenhower and Henry Morgenthau. They began planning for this in 1944, before the extent of the atrocities of the death camps became known. (That more Germans did not starve to death or die of illness in the post-war years was due to the humanity of Herbert Hoover and others.) Awareness of this act of genocide has been suppressed for fifty years not only by the Allied governments but also by the German government. http://www.serendipity.li/hr.html#c&m

Why is FDR not reviled for allowing 3,000 Americans to be slain at Pearl Harbor just so that he could enter a war, he had promised Americans he would not enter? Yes, there were concentration camps and ovens. Were the ovens used to cremate masses of dead bodies who died from starvation? Did the Germans torture people? Yes. Americans and British torture people today. The CIA tortures people today. Why are they not viewed in the same light? Is torture justified by some, but not by others? In Hitler’s day, there was no Geneva Convention or Nuremberg Code. What is the excuse for violating those international standards? In comparison, Hitler had no such restrictions. Today the restrictions exist, but are ignored. Who then, is the worse war criminal: Hitler or Bush? Why is the life of a Jew who leeched off of Germany, then declared war on it with the intent to starve the nation, more important than a German who defended his country against an enemy within? The Jews had publicly stated their intention to starve the Germans to death. They were parasites in the nation of Germany. To begin with, the Jews were not totally innocent as they have always been presented. In 1933, they declared an war on Germany, a nation that had been more than hospitable to them.
Documents Relating to the Holocaust JUDEA DECLARES WAR ON GERMANY Jews Of All The World Unite In Action Section 4 Page 8

BOYCOTT OF GERMAN GOODS http://www.historiography-project.org/documents/19330324dailyexpress.html http://americandefenseleague.com/judea_declares_war_on_germany.htm Jewish Defector warns America. "The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them, that will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business." And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. Their labor. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There just was not enough food for more than one third of the population. http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm

Germany imported 2/3 of its food. The successful economic boycott led to the starvation of Germans which was the stated goal of the Rothschild controlled Jews.
A Jewish Defector Warns America: “ Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. "We've been so nice to them"; and from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than they wanted Palestine as a so-called “Jewish commonwealth.” http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm

After helping the Jews, Germany was betrayed by them. Hitler was left with Jews who had declared war on Germany, in ghetto prisons when he was unable to deport them. He did not have enough food to feed his own law-abiding citizens for whom he was responsible. When Germany received food rations, the food went to his law-abiding citizens, not to the revolutionary Jews who had openly stated their intent to starve the Germans.
Jewish Defector warns America. "The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them, that will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business." And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. Their labor. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There just was not enough food for more than one third of the population. http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm Section 4 Page 9

There is an orchestrated effort to silence anyone who questions the official Holocaust story. Why? If, in fact, atrocities happened exactly as the public has been told, why is there a need to suppress looking at the evidence a little closer? Why are people who question the official story, like David Irving and Zundel, incarcerated? Is Charlie Manson censored? Was Ted Bundy censored? David Irving is a respected historian. Did he not have the right to publish the facts as he saw them? More importantly, why are these people who question the official version of the Holocaust put in prison? If they are lying or wrong, they should not be a threat to anyone. There are books on the assassination of John F. Kennedy ranging from the big conspiracy angle to Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. Should one version of that tragedy be censored so that only one side of the story is heard? If the Jews had some fault, is it just to lay ALL the blame at the feet of Hitler when he repeatedly tried to offer other solutions in spite of his well-known vitriolic rhetoric? Most people are unaware that Hitler was a Rothschild and participated as an “actor” on the world stage in the Rothschild plan for a New World Order. It was not an accident that he had a Charlie Chaplin moustache. Charlie Chaplain was used to give Hitler coded messages as to the program he should follow in the planned war, but he had a different vision than his Rothschild cousins whose plan is being carried out now.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcvjoWOwnn4&NR=1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJOuoyoMhj8&NR=1

In the following video, Hitler is speaking to the youth. In Rothschild code, he was speaking to the “children” which is code for RothsCHILD. To understand the Rothschild world, one must understand that it is all conducted in a secret code spoken by all. Every speech Hitler gave was full of secret messages to his cousins. He preached an Aryan race but he was not Aryan. He was saying to the Rothschilds: the children were all pure, but you are not pure. You are half-breeds, but I am leading them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_440uVJ6aA&NR=1 Get bone of my bone video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCBXcnndhJU Explain age difference. Hitler was calling for unity amoung his cousins.

The public’s view of him is skewed because he was the victim of a propaganda campaign waged against him by his Rothschild cousins due to the fact he also was “winner take all” in a gamble with his cousins over the Rothschild fortune. The Rothschilds used the principle of the BIG LIE against him. Principles of the BIG LIE:
...never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe Section 4 Page 10

it.[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Lie

He justified his fight for the German people and against Jews by using godly and Biblical reasoning. Indeed, one of his most revealing statements makes this quite clear: His beliefs stem from the writings of well respected Christian, Martin Luther.
"Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord." http://www.nobeliefs.com/hitler.htm "My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice... And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people. -Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922 (Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, April 1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942) http://www.nobeliefs.com/hitler.htm

(Hitler was an actor. Hitler spoken in a coded language. Not all that he said should be taken literally.) What were Hitler’s options as Chancellor? As you know, Hitler was dramatic and used theatrics to advance his cause. What you may not be aware of is that the Rothschilds communicate with one another and have for centuries, through the media. They do not call each other on the phone. They kill people and send coded messages in blood to each other using a symbol language. When Hitler made statements about “JEWS”, he was speaking directly to his Rothschild cousins who loved being threatened and frightened. This Satanic game Rothschilds have played for centuries. Most statements about killing Jews meant Hitler’s desire to kill his cousins - something he should have done, but did not do, with the exception of a woman named Elizabeth Rothschild who symbolized Elizabeth Windsor. In the Rothschild world innocent people are killed to “pay” for the sins of the guilty. The deaths are messages that reflect, “This is what I’d like to do to you.” Hitler was working on his part of the Rothschild plan. He was funded by them and aided by them.
'Mein Kampf' - Hitler Used Rothschild Banker's Typewriter Section 4 Page 11

Emil Georg von Stauss, the president of Germany's largest bank, the Deutsche Bank, lent Hitler a portable Remington so he could write his infamous anti-Jewish banker manifesto "Mein Kampf." Von Stauss, a principal Nazi Party fund raiser, also was a longtime business associate of the Rothschilds. http://www.rense.com/general77/meinl.htm

The Rothschilds wanted him to complete his role, so they could lay the blame of the atrocities on him, discredit him, and just throw him away. They, then, wanted to steal what he had attained. What a person sees does not always reflect the reality of the situation. The Rothschilds are masters at tweaking the doors of perception. What happens when we can no longer believe our own eyes?
25 Tactics for Truth Suppression http://alaskafreepress.com/msgboard/disinfo/index.html

One successful technique used in mind control or brainwashing is to shock someone then alter the person’s perspective of what happened. The photos of many dead Jews would shock anyone. The Rothschilds provided the explanation for how the photographs came to be: Hitler the evil one, intentionally killed the Jews. The Rothschilds failed to mention how Germany did not have enough food to feed its citizens, let alone its prisoners of war. The Jews were kept alive by Prisoner of War food rations provided by the Rothschild controlled Red Cross, and other agencies. The Allies, who had conspired to deliver Palestine, a nation they did not own, to the Rothschilds to be used as the new Israel, intentionally bombed the roads on which the Prisoner of War food rations were delivered thereby creating the conditions under which many, if not most of the Jews died. The photographs of most of the dead Jews in World War II photos clearly show the people died of starvation. The questions is, “Who is to blame for that?” Historians failed to state that the Rothschilds made sure the Red Cross Prisoner of War food was cut off, and ordered the Allies to bomb the roads on which the food supplies were delivered in order to ensure the high Jewish death count. Hitler got all the blame, but he was not entirely responsible for what occurred. The Rothschilds failed to allow the public to know they planned the state of Israel well before there ever was a Holocaust, but used the Holocaust as an excuse to start the state up again in 1948. The Rothschild plan to start Israel dated back to 1917 - long before Hitler ever came to power. The Holocaust is always used as the reason the Jews must have a homeland, but why then were the plans agreed upon by England and the Rothschilds in 1917?
THE BALFOUR DECLARATION Foreign Office November 2nd, 1917 Dear Lord Rothschild,

Section 4 Page 12

I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet. "His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country." http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/balfour.htm

In order to have an excuse to re-create the nation of Israel, they needed to have a reason and created that reason by creating the conditions under which so many Jews were starved to death. The Rothschilds failed to balance the picture of all the dead Jews with evidence that Hitler tried to avoid that war.
Hitler Didn't Want World War Hitler didn't want a world war, and had no stomach for fighting England, according to Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Louis Kilzer, author of Churchill's Deception (Simon & Schuster, 1994). Hitler believed the future of Western civilization depended on the cooperation of Germany and her Aryan cousins: England and the United States. His territorial demands were limited to Communist Russia, which he regarded as a proxy for Jewish world ambitions. He was determined to avoid fighting a war on two fronts. The "miracle at Dunkirk" was in fact an extraordinary peace overture to England. We don't normally associate Hitler with such magnanimity. In May 1940, the British were on the verge of defeat. The English army was trapped at Dunkirk. Rather than take them prisoner, Hitler halted his generals for three days allowing 330,000 [British] men to escape. [He did so, because he was their KING. It was a gesture of love towards his people.] "The blood of every single Englishman is too valuable to shed," Hitler said. "Our two people belong together racially and traditionally. That is and always has been my aim, even if our generals can't grasp it." (Kilzer, p.213) http://www.savethemales.ca/000369.html

There was a motive for the Rothschilds wanting to smear Hitler until he could never again appear in public. They had personal motive for smearing him beyond redemption. To meet their goals, the Rothschilds needed to victimize Jews, and to create a high Jewish death count to meet that goal. The French and English Rothschilds threatened any country who would accept Hitler’s Jewish prisoners as deportees with financial ruin. They had a track record of being able to deliver upon that threat. Their basic message was, “You take the Jews, we will destroy you.” Besides the propaganda campaign against Hitler’s popular memory in order to stop him from claiming his throne ,- something that cannot be legitimately stolen as it is a title and authority bestowed by God and God, alone, his evil relatives who funded both Naziism and Communism, launched a campaign to imprison the entire planet in total slavery of mankind. They are not in
Section 4 Page 13

control of man; God is. The quest for Satan or his henchmen was a losing proposition from its inception. Satan was a created being who delusionally believed he could overtake his Creator, and nothing anyone could say would stop him from trying. Elizabeth Mountbatten, her insane son, and others in this sorry story are followers of Lucifer and strive to be the “god of this world”.
CHARLES PROCLAIMED "SAVIOR OF THE WORLD" AND A STATUE IS PLANNED FOR HIM! Part 2 In Antichrist Series

http://www.cuttingedge.org/NEWS/n1678.cfm

The attitude of Lucifer is consistent with their beliefs:
Isaiah 14 11 Thy pomp is brought down to the grave, and the noise of thy viols: the worm is spread under thee, and the worms cover thee. 12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! 13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: 14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. 15 Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.

Hitler’s evil cousins were far worse than Hitler ever was, even if everything that has been said about him is true. To accurately analyze any situation, a person must have ALL the facts. Are there other factors to consider? The Rothschilds failed to tell people that in spite of Hitler’s dramatic rhetoric, he tried to deport the Jews rather than kill them. Hitler’s threat to kill the “Jews” was for the most part theatre. This is not to say he was not willing to sacrifice people or kill them. He was a Rothschild, and that is what they have done and still do. If you study Hitler’s rhetoric and then look at his actions, the portrayal of him as a killer of innocent Jews does not stand the test of truth. His threats were to commit genocide against Jews who had declared their intent to commit genocide against Germans, but his actions told a different story. His actions did not support the widely accepted belief that he planned to murder millions of Jews. It is fact that he threatened to kill them, but it is also fact that his preference was to DEPORT them. As Chancellor his duty was to protect his people from enemies foreign and domestic. The Jews
Section 4 Page 14

openly identified themselves as enemies of Germany, and it is time that the myth be destroyed that the poor little Jews were picked on by big bad Hitler for no good reason. They openly plotted genocide against Germans and published their intentions in the newspapers.
"The fight against Germany has now been waged for months by every Jewish community, on every conference, in all labor unions and by every single Jew in the world. There are reasons for the assumption that our share in this fight is of general importance. We shall start a spiritual and material war of the whole world against Germany. Germany is striving to become once again a great nation, and to recover her lost territories as well as her colonies. But our Jewish interests call for the complete destruction of Germany..." (Valadimir Jabotinsky, in Mascha Rjetsch, January, 1934) http://forum.bodybuilding.com/archive/index.php?t-770098.html

Hitler’s basic message, although delivered with dramatic emotion was, “Get these traitorous, ungrateful Jews (who worked for the French/English Rothschilds) out of Germany, OR I will kill them.” Deportation of Jews was his first choice: .
The 'Final Solution' of Adolf Hitler retained a single meaning right through WW2, central to the program of 'National socialism,' and signified the deportation of Jews, generally eastwards to Poland and Russia[ International Jewish organisations twice declared war on Germany, in 1933 then again in 1939[27]. As the 'final solution' policy[28] was thwarted by the Allies, the camps became places of hard labour; then under the impact of Allied terror-bombing ravages of disease and famine took place. http://www.rense.com/general81/chamber.htm

IF the Jews were not deported, then he would kill them. The fact that so many of them died of starvation, as evidenced by the photos, is proof that he did not intentionally kill them. Only if he had enough food to feed them and refused to do so, could one lay all the blame at his feet. The Jewish community is well aware of Hitler’s desire to deport the Jews rather than kill them.
Ten questions to the Zionists by Rabbi Michael Dov Weissmandl ZT"L Dean of Nitra Yeshiva and author of min hametzar (Published by the author in 1948 and reprinted many times) 1. IS IT TRUE that in 1941 and again in 1942, the German Gestapo offered all European Jews transit to Spain, if they would relinquish all their property in Germany and Occupied France; on condition that: a) none of the deportees travel from Spain to Palestine; and b) all the deportees be transported from Spain to the USA or British colonies, and there to remain; with entry visas to be arranged by the Jews living there; and c) $1000.00 ransom for each family to be furnished by the Agency, payable upon the arrival of the family at the Spanish border at the rate of 1000 families daily. 2. IS IT TRUE that the Zionist leaders in Switzerland and Turkey received this offer with the clear understanding that the exclusion of Palestine as a destination for the deportees was based on an agreement between the Gestapo and the Mufti. Section 4 Page 15

3. IS IT TRUE that the answer of the Zionist leaders was negative, with the following comments: a) ONLY Palestine would be considered as a destination for the deportees. b) The European Jews must accede to suffering and death greater in measure than the other nations, in order that the victorious allies agree to a "Jewish State" at the end of the war. c) No ransom will be paid http://www.nkusa.org/Historical_Documents/tenquestions.cfm

Here is another view of the facts leading to World War II that are conveniently left out of the history people are taught. The history people are taught, by the way, in highly controlled way by the same people who perpetrated the wars. They controlled the information fed to the masses. Hitler did state in his writings that he was aware that every Jew was not aware of his role in advancing the Rothschild agenda, but Hitler’s belief was that if he did not stop the advancement of the Jewish money machine, Germans and Germany would be destroyed. (Supposedly 19 hijackers attacked America on 9-11, but war has been declared on Muslims around the world. Iraq had no role in 911, but over 80,000 civilians have been killed, and no one seems to flinch an eye over it. “We don’t do body counts.” General Tommy Franks. Why is it that America can take this stance, but Hitler was scorned, especially when did not want war and tried to prevent it. He simply did not want the Jews controlling his nation, and tried to deport them. Neither Saddam Hussein nor Iraq attacked America, but Americans are over in Iraq destroying that nation and its people while Americans blindly trust their moronic “leader” - cocaine addicted alcoholic who never went through rehabilitation, and never succeeded at anything he attempted except to execute more prisoners than other governors. Bush is a man who openly has served in a Satanic cult, and Americans have continued to march in lock step to his every idiotic whim because they are too lazy to perform their duties as citizens. America with its trillion dollar budget daily fails the American people who continue to open their wallets and pay for an incompetent nonresponsive, ineffectual government which in fact works AGAINST the foundation of this country.) WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORLD WAR II? Rothschild, Windsor, and Churchill, to name a few. Churchill was a short-sighted opportunist.
Obsessed not only with defeating Hitler, but with destroying Germany, Churchill was oblivious to the danger of a Soviet inundation of Europe until it was far too late. SNIP But while Winston had no principles, there was one constant in his life: the love of war. SNIP He attended Sandhurst, the military academy, instead of the universities, and "from the moment that Churchill left Sandhurst . . . he did his utmost to get into a fight, wherever a war was going on." All his life he was most excited on the evidence, only really excited by war. He loved war as few modern men ever have he even "loved the bangs," as he called them, and he was very brave under fire. In 1925, Churchill wrote: "The story of the human race is war." Section 4 Page 16

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/raico-churchill1.html Churchill, after 1945, promoted Hitler's doctrine "I said that frankly, as I had listened to him inveigh so violently against the threat of Soviet domination and the spread of Communism in Europe, and disclose such a lack of confidence in the professions of good faith in Soviet leadership. I had wondered whether he (Churchill), the Prime Minister, was now willing to declare to the world that he and Britain had made a mistake in not supporting Hitler, for as I understood him, he was now expressing the doctrine which Hitler and Goebbels had been proclaiming and reitering for the past for years ... Exactly the same conditions which he described and the same deductions were drawn from them as he now appeared to assert." (Foreign Relations of the United States - The Conference of Berlin - The Potsdam Conference Vol. I, p. 73) http://globalfire.tv/nj/03en/history/whowasah.htm One of his famous sentences after the WWII: "I think we have slaughtered the wrong pig".

One can infer from that quote since England went to war against Germany, he acknowledged that he made a mistake. There is published evidence to support the above statement that Hitler did not want to go to war with England - his OWN country. Others, too, saw the need to curb Communism, and agreed with Hitler. World War II did not have to be so destructive.
"Step by step, I have arrived at the conviction that the aims of Communism in Europe are sinister and fatal. At the Nuremberg Trials, I, together with my Russian colleague, condemned Nazi Aggression and Terror. I believe now that Hitler and the German People did not want war. But we, {England}, declared war on Germany, intent on destroying it, in accordance with our principle of Balance of Power, and we were encouraged by the 'Americans'{Jews} around Roosevelt. We ignored Hitler's pleading, not to enter into war. Now we are forced to realize that Hitler was right. He offered us the co-operation of Germany: instead, since 1945, we have been facing the immense power of the Soviet Empire. I feel ashamed and humiliated to see that the aims we accused Hitler of, are being relentless pursued now, only under a different label." (Ashamed and Humiliated The British Attorney General, Sir Hartle Shawcross, said in a speech at Stourbridge, March 16/84 (AP)). http://forum.bodybuilding.com/archive/index.php?t-770098.html

The Bible speaks of a return to a God-worshipping Israel, but man is on earth with free will, and if he chooses evil over good, then the outcome of the story is different than originally planned. The Jews need to take responsibility for what Israel has become. Did they let money become their God instead of the God of the Old Testament? One of the Rothschild tactics is to take God’s plan and then twist it to fit their personal agenda. In order to create a motivation for the creation of Israel, a Holocaust was PLANNED well before WWII ever began. The Rothschilds, through their intelligence and monetary networks controlled many groups of people, especially Jews whom they funded and whose financial operations they coordinated in an
Section 4 Page 17

effort to consolidate power in the hands of the money changers. WHAT’S WORLD DOMINATION WITHOUT A THRONE - AN ETERNAL THRONE? The Rothschilds fomented the French Revolution in order to destroy the French monarchy.
“On Sept. 9, 1785, Joseph Utzschneider, a lawyer, and two other defectors revealed the Illuminati goals before a Court of Inquiry in Bavaria: Abolition of the Monarchy and all ordered government; Abolition of private property (which the Illuminati will assume); Abolition of Patriotism (nations); Family, (through the abolition of Marriage, Morality, and by government providing "Education" for children) and finally, Abolition of all Religion, particularly Christianity.” http://www.savethemales.ca/001260.html

Their goal, which they subsequently obtained, was to gain title to the British throne, and place a Rothschild as monarch. The Rothschilds were responsible for legally removing the Windsors from the British throne. Although the objective to legally remove the Windsors was met, the spoiled scion of Meyer Amschel Rothschild worked against their founding father because of jealousy that they were not the “Chosen One” which is why Elizabeth Mountbatten, a fraud, is known to the world as “Queen.” In reality she is not one. During the years, 1649-1660, England did not have a reigning monarch. During the years 1936 until the time I reclaimed the throne - sometime in 2004 - England had pretenders sitting on the throne- people who were not fit to rule, and people who were not legitimate. People who destroyed the nation, destroyed the kingdom. I saved my country from a World War with no help. Can they deny that I am the King prophecied to appear at the end time - especially when the Satanists were told by Satan, himself, that I was to be that King. They kept the information from me, but did that stop God’s power?
Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people. Jer 23:5 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth. Ps 99:4 The king’s strength also loveth judgment; thou dost establish equity, thou executest judgment and righteousness in Jacob. Pr 25:5 Take away the wicked from before the king, and his throne shall be established in righteousness. Isa 32:1 Behold, a king shall reign in righteousness, and princes shall rule in judgment.

The public only can learn from the knowledge base available to it, and usually believes what the media tells it. The public does not see the world from a spiritual perspective. The people do not know the future. They do not know who the wolves are in sheep’s clothing. God knows the truth. He is never fooled. By His foreknowledge, He knew what England would need. Hitler respected the British, and showed his loyalty to his people. He was not out to make them speak German. He was there to work with King Edward VIII to the benefit of the British. Hitler gained legal title to the throne of the United Kingdom after a breach was made in a contract
Section 4 Page 18

between Hitler and King Edward VIII.
Nuremberg Rally and Parade http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilXVkgmJk2E

The Rothschilds originally had five branches in five major European cities. Being a member of the royal family was not sufficient to the 20th century Rothschild power brokers. Family feuds erupted and Rothschild spilled the blood of Rothschild trying to gain the crown from Hitler There were some Rothschilds who would stop at nothing in an effort to become “God’s Elect.” Guy de Rothschild and his cousin, Elie de Rothschild were the two worst family members. (They were both murdered in the summer of 2007.) They believed they owed no loyalty to Meyer Amschel’s mission, and they could change the plan at their whim. Needless to say, they did not follow the family motto as stated below:
“Lord Rothschild in his book The Shadow of a Great Man quotes a letter sent from Davidson on June 24, 1814 to Nathan Rothschild, “As long as a house is like yours, and as long as you work together with your brothers, not a house in the world will be able to compete with you, to cause you harm or to take advantage of you, for together you can undertake and perform more than any house in the world."(1) The closeness of the Rothschild brothers is seen in a letter from Saloman (Salmon) Rothschild to his brother Nathan on Feb. 28, 1815, "We are like the mechanism of a watch: each part is essential.” http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/the_rothschild_bloodline.htm

The French and British branches planned to eliminate the other branches, and claim the British throne for themselves. There was also bad blood between the two remaining houses: French Rothschild vs. British Rothschild. Of the two families, the most evil of the pit of vipers resided in the French House of Rothschild. The Bible states that in the last days children would be disobedient to parents. Satan did not fare any better than God did in this arena. Total rebellion means just that. Satan’s children also rebelled against their chosen leader, Meyer Amschel Rothschild, which spelled defeat for their plans. In other words the modern Rothschilds decided to usurp the Rothschild plan for personal glory rather than institute the plan as designed. Hitler descended from the Austrian line from which the other Rothschilds received the royal title of “Baron”.
Meet the Real Adolf Hitler!! Hitler was a Rothschild!! http://www.reformation.org/adolf-hitler.html

Adolf Hitler who was one of the “hidden” Rothschilds who was selected to play a part in the plan for the one world government. Hitler’s ascension to Chancellor of Germany was manipulated by an older generation of Rothschild. Hitler’s younger cousins believed they could use him for their own gain, and then destroy him. He ended up battling his cousins. World War II was an outward expression of that family feud. When Hitler spoke about the “JEWS” he was directly speaking about his cousins who had controlled the imprisoned Jews by the Rothschild intricate financial/banking empire they manipulated. The French house of Rothschild produced Hitler’s enemy cousins: Guy de Rothschild and Elie de Rothschild. Hitler’s cousins were simply jealous of Hitler’s accomplishments, and attempted to
Section 4 Page 19

denigrate him, treating him as if he was “poor relations” because Hitler’s father was the illegitimate son of Baron Salomon Rothschild of Vienna. Hitler, knowing the true conditions of the births of both Guy and Elie, believed himself not to be inferior, but superior to his cousins. Guy and Elie’s mothers were not married to their father - Baron Maurice de Rothschild, but to other men. Hitler’s parents were married to each other. In the Hitler youth videos he can be heard saying that the youth are bone of his bone and flesh of his flesh. In code, he was saying to his young cousins (the children), “There is illegitimacy on both sides. You are not any different then I am.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIyF3B1_0bk&feature=related

Hitler knew the truth of the conditions of Guy and Elie’s birth. He knew both Rothschilds were products of adulterous relationships their mothers had. Baron Édouard de Rothschild was not Guy’s biological father, and Baron Robert Philippe de Rothschild was not Elie de Rothschild’s biological father. It is quite possible that Guy and Elie were, in fact, half-brothers both being the sons of Baron Édouard and Baron Robert’s other cousin, Baron Maurice de Rothschild. (It is possible that Elie’s father was not Maurice, but an outsider, but he stuck by the story that Maurice was his father.) The trauma and rejection both Guy and Elie suffered from being illegitimate drove them to extremes to attempt to legitimize themselves. Gaining the crown was what they believed would do just that. Both Guy and Elie were relentless in their hatred for Hitler who was no less proud than they. Baron Guy de Rothschild married Baroness Alix Hermine Jeanette Schey de Koromla in 1937. At the end of 1942, his wife gave birth to a son, David. Baron David’s father was Guy’s British cousin, Lord Victor Rothschild’s son, not Guy’s. Guy was away at war fighting for his country against his cousin, the Chancellor of Germany. So David was born under similar circumstances to Guy, illegitimate, but still Rothschild. This made him half-brother with the Rothschild he and his father would eventually have murdered: Amschel Rothschild, Victor’s legitimate son. Amschel was half- brother of British Lord Victor’s other legitimate son, Jacob Rothschild of England. Illegitimacy then became a major factor in this epic drama. In some ways the root of this war to seize the crown by illegal piracy, was a quest to legitimize illegitimacy for many of the players. The incest became “irrelevant,” so to speak, because of the practice of royalty intermarrying blood relations. Rothschilds were under orders to intermarry by the founding father, Meyer Amschel Rothschild, in his will.
MAYER AMSCHEL'S WILL When he died on September 19, 1812, the founder of the House of Rothschild left a will that was just days old. In it, he laid down specific laws by which the House that bore his name would operate in future year. The laws were as follows: (1) All key positions in the House of Rothschild were to be held by members of the family, and not by hired hands. Only male members of the family were allowed to participate in the business. The eldest son of the eldest son was to be the head of the family unless the majority of the rest of the family agreed otherwise. It was for this exceptional reason that Nathan, who was particularly Section 4 Page 20

brilliant, was appointed head of the House of Rothschild in 1812. (2) The family was to intermarry with their own first and second cousins, thus preserving the vast fortune. This rule was strictly adhered to early on but later, when other rich Jewish banking houses came on the scene, it was relaxed to allow some of the Rothschilds to marry selected members of the new elite. http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/slavery.htm

The management problems arose when Guy refused to follow the family rules in order to try to heal his broken ego. The Rothschilds always work through agents or hired hands which is perfectly acceptable as a condition of Mayer Amschel’s will, but the 20th century generation of treacherous Rothschilds failed to adhere to the tenets of his mandates.
(1) All key positions in the House of Rothschild were to be held by members of the family, and not by hired hands. Only male members of the family were allowed to participate in the business.

Guy, the unofficial leader of the family had some personal issues which he allowed to fog his thinking. He and Elie, not only let hired hands in the inner circle, he allowed Elizabeth Mountbatten, a female, to participate in our family business. They cannot then claim that I have no right to participate in family business as a female, especially since I inherited control and ownership of the City of London. The problem lies in how the “hired hands” were handled. Hermann Goering was a hired hand who was fired by Hitler and then turned over to trial by his handlers. His conviction should have sent the message that Goering’s treason and betrayal of Hitler was not going to be rewarded. Goering’s surviving his suicide is another story, but he did survive and lived in San Diego, California as the 1st Toyota dealer in America: John A. Rose. His illegitimate son is Alan Douglas Bersin, who was assigned to carry out his father’s NAZI agenda. Just before Bersin took his office as Superintendent of San Diego Unified School District, he vacationed in a little town near Visalia, Calfornia, where John A. Rose owned property. Bersin was born on 10/14/46. Goering was scheduled to die at Nuremburg on 10/15/46. Goering was “born again” in bersin/prison. (“b’s” and “p’s” are used interchangably like “6’s” and “9’s” - that is, if you are a benighted one.) George Herbert Walker Bush was another hired hand. Bill and Hillary Clinton were hired hands. Guy and Elie allowed them all to get out of control and out of hand thereby leading the hired hands to think they could just do anything they wanted including trying to steal my crown. Guy and Elie never intended for them to have the crown, but allowed them to joust with them to try to take it. Should they have been “successful”, Guy and Elie would have just killed them. The root of this management problem was the fact that Guy and Elie were sado-masochists and needed someone to “beat on them” when they were in a masochistic mood. This was done more psychologically than physically. Hermann Goering and Bill Clinton, because of their megalomanic psychosis, were unable to just work as hired hands. They internalised their quest to become royal and convinced themselves that each was really the “Chosen Ones” for whom the crown was really meant. They were unable to distinguish fantasy from fact. They were not the only fools who believed this. Idiots like Donald Rumsfeld, Bob Gates, and others also believed they were destined to be King of the United Kingdom. Bersin actually believed he REALLY was the Prince of Wales, and that Princess Diana (whom he helped murder) was really his wife! No, I am not making this up. This information can be decoded in many sources because the psuedo illumined ones left a diary of everything they thought and did in secret code hiding out
Section 4 Page 21

in the open, and I broke the code. (Along with my fortunes, titles I inherited, I was given a prophetic gift which assisted me in breaking the code.) ROTHSCHILD VENDETTA Both Guy and Elie de Rothschild, sado-masochists, personally fought against their cousin. Both desired leadership, but proved time and time again they were not fit for the “top job.” A leader must learn to stand alone - something neither one could do. They felt most comfortable in a group taking orders from others.
Mickey Rooney - Treat Me Rough http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7Xb4qgj-TA&feature=related

Apparently, Guy didn’t like being treated too roughly though. While Guy served in the French military, and Hitler was being honored as a great leader, Hitler had Guy’s ship torpedoed The scene was reminiscent of the scene in “Jaws” in which shipwrecked survivors were routinely picked off by hungry great white sharks.
“He narrowly escaped death when his ship was torpedoed and sunk. Rescued, he celebrated his safe arrival with an 1895 bottle of Château Lafite from the family vineyards.” http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/14/business/worldbusiness/14rothschild.html?_r=2&pagewanted =2&oref=slogin Two years later, with the outbreak of World War II, he was called up to serve as a young cavalry officer. Rothschild fought well in the first days of the war, winning a Croix de Guerre in northern France before he joined the British retreat from Dunkirk. After being evacuated to England, Rothschild returned immediately to France and was demobilized following the French defeat. He then took charge of the family’s office at La Bourbale, near Clermont-Ferrand. Under the Fascist Vichy government, Rothschild’s father and uncles were stripped of their French nationality, removed from the register of the Légion d'honneur, and the family was forced to sell its possessions. Rothschild managed to persuade the buyers to grant options under which he would later be able to buy the family's interests back. Rothschild and his wife left France in 1941 for New York, where Rothschild’s parents had already relocated, and Baron Guy joined General Charles de Gaulle’s Free French forces. A year later, the couple’s first son, David, was born. As part of the Free French Forces, Rothschild boarded the cargo ship, Pacific Grove, to travel back to Europe. His ship was torpedoed and sunk in March 1943, and he was rescued after spending 12 hours in the Atlantic. http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/biography/GuyRothschild.html

This is something Guy never forgave Hitler for, and he would exact his revenge on Hitler and Hitler’s relatives. Hitler was born in 1889. The 1895 bottle of Château Lafite was a warning to Hitler. Guy and the other Rothschilds, because of their close personal ties to Satan, knew Hitler would one day have a descendent known as “6” born on a 666 day. 1889 plus 6 is 1895. The message being, I will get even with you through your children and grandchildren. (I was born on 6/6/51. 5 + 1 adding up to six.) As they indicated, they would do, they exacted their revenge on Hitler by planning World War III with me as the centerpiece. Guy’s desire for revenge guided his life.
Section 4 Page 22

Besides torpedoing Guy’s ship, Hitler also imprisoned Guy’s French cousin, Elie de Rothschild: World War II service
[Elie} and his brother served as officers in a cavalry regiment - the Anciens 11èmes Cuirassiers when Nazi Germany invaded France in 1940. Both were captured by the Germans close to the Belgian border during World War II. Élie was taken to a prisoner of war camp at Nienberg near Hamburg. After being discovered planning to escape, he was taken to Colditz Castle, then to Lübeck, one of the toughest POW camps. There, he was reunited with his brother. As persons of Jewish descent, both were fortunate in being treated as captured officers, thus avoiding the extermination camps. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elie_de_Rothschild With the outbreak of the Second World War, Alain and Elie rode off to the front with their cavalry regiment, the Anciens 11èmes Cuirassiers - "like Pancho Villa," Elie said, "with a horse and a sabre". After German forces invaded France in May 1940 the brothers were captured (Alain was in hospital, recovering from wounds) near the Belgian frontier.Elie was sent to a German PoW camp near Nienburg from which, after an unsuccessful escape attempt, he was sent to Colditz. Subsequently he was moved again, to a camp at Lübeck, where he was reunited with Alain. In the immediate postwar years, in Paris, Elie and Alain and their wives shared 23 avenue de Marigny. During the war the house had been occupied as Luftwaffe headquarters and had been frequented by Hermann Goering; it was then taken over by their English cousin Victor, Lt-Col Lord Rothschild, who had become a wartime specialist in counter-sabotage (bomb disposal). http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/08/07/db0702.xml

Guy and Elie would stop at nothing to try to steal Hitler’s legal acquisition, the crown of many nations, and the bulk of the Rothschild fortune to go with that crown. In actuality, there were two crowns available besides the crown of the sovereign state, City of London. HOW DID HITLER GAIN THE CROWNS? Hitler was on excellent terms with Edward, Prince of Wales, soon to be King Edward VIII. Prince Edward highly respected the new Chancellor of Germany and knew of his royal Merovingian blood line. He was well-pleased to be able to negotiate an agreement with Hitler and Germany as he was a devout Germanophile. He spoke high German better than he spoke English. Edward, Prince of Wales fully intended to become king and remain king. He never considered that he would one day have to abdicate his throne when he made this agreement with Hitler. He had no legitimate children and was not sure he would have legitimate children. As future King Edward VIII, he was responsible for making sure his nieces, heirs to the throne, were well married. He knew Hitler knew the real conditions of the birth of his nieces, and he knew Hitler’s past as well. It was in the best interest of both parties to attempt to “legitimize” the “illegitimacies” in their respective families by keeping them secret. King James I was also illegitmate, being gthe son of Mary Queen of Scots Secretary Rizzio, but this exception was also made. There was no exception made for Keppel’s bastards. They were not part of the Hitler King Edward agreement - no matter how they would have liked to have been. Cold-hearted ambition, insatiable greed and ungovernable lust are not conditions for attaining royalty. Liz was precontrated in marriage to my father - not to a relative of hers. Liz rejected her legal right to sit on the throne. When she refused to honor the contract with my father, she lost her royal status. Even Herman Goering who believed himself to be God could not
Section 4 Page 23

give her what she wanted. The coded evidence of this is also voluminous. She has also admitted that she believes that I - not she is the Queen of the United Kingdom. (As has her son, dummy Charlie.)
It was obvious in June 1483, however that this particular horse was not going to run, and necessary therefore that Edward V's unfitness to wear a crown be established by other means. Shortly after the fiasco of Shaa's sermon, Gloucester had it put about that Edward IV's marriage to Elizabeth Wydville was invalid because he had at the time been contracted to another lady, and that their children were bastards and incapable of inheriting the throne. It was this that was the eventual basis of Gloucester's claim to sovereignty. The Princes in the Tower by Alison Weir (pg. 117)

Her children are bastards.
A precontract, in that period, was a promise before witnesss to marry followed by sexual intercourse. Many couples lived together on the strength of this and did not have their unions blessed in church. A precontract was as binding as a marriage and could only be dissolved by the ecclesiastical authroities. by 1330 the law recognized that an isisting precontract with one partner was a bar to marriage with another and sufficient to bastardise any children of a subsequent marriage. The Princes in the Tower by Alison Weir (pg. 119)

It is the tradition of royals to have their spouses chosen for them to benefit the realm. Prince Edward/King Edward VIII had every right to negotiate a marriage for his niece - which he did do. In the agreement, England and Germany would form an alliance, Hitler would become a King of Germany and King Edward VIII would remain King of the United Kingdom. They agreed to keep the conditions of the births of Elizabeth and Margaret secret, and the conditions of the birth of Hitler’s son, my father, would also remain secret. The Windsors and Hitler agreed not to take illegitimacy into account because Princess Elizabeth was the biological product of an incestuous union of her father and her aunt, Princess Royal Mary. There are other very shocking conditions related to her birth which I will expose at some future time. (Can you spell h-e-r-m-a-p-h-r-o-d-i-t-e?) The true conditions of her birth were covered up and reported only in the inner circles as “artificial insemination”:
The Queen [Queen Mum] had demonstrated stout resolve in facing other obstacles in the past; the most pressing was her inability to get pregnant during the months after her wedding. The fertility problem stemmed from the 'nervousness' that afflicted her husband, producing his debilitating stutter, distracting twitches, rickety legs, and bleeding ulcers. Most disturbing to the new bride was his inability to impregnate her. This was a disorder he shared with his older brother. When the Duchess of Windsor was asked why she had no children with her husband, she joked about the disability: The Duke is not heir-conditioned." "Neither was his brother. For two barren years the Duchess of York was unable to conceive. She consulted several gynecologists and obstetricians about the problem. Finally, on the advice of her doctor, Lane Phillips, she and her husband submitted to the unorthodox science of artificial insemination. The arduous procedure of mechanically injecting his sperm into her uterus finally enabled her to get pregnant. Only because of this manual fertilization was she able to produce her first child, Elizabeth, in 1926, and her second, Margaret Rose, in 1930." The Royals by Kitty Kelley (pg. 23).

Section 4 Page 24

Elizabeth’s biological mother was her aunt - her father’s sister, The Princess Mary, Princess Royal and Countess of Harewood. Prince George, Duke of York, and his sister, Princess Mary had previously had a long lasting incestuous relationship from childhood.
In 1926, she became the commandant-in-chief of the British Red Cross Detachments. (Elizabeth was born in 1926. Harewood is symbol for “the rabbit died”) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary%2C_Princess_Royal_and_Countess_of_Harewood

Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon was not Elizabeth’s biological mother.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Bowes-Lyon

King Edward VIII apparently also did have an illegitimate son by one of his married mistresses, and there were rumors of a daughter as well.
“Evidently, Elizabeth had been born in England in June of 1934. Her true parents were later to be known as the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.” http://we3.org/

Hitler also had an illegitimate son. Princess Elizabeth was promised to marry Hitler’s son - my father. My father would become a Prince, and by agreement with Elizabeth’s parents, would marry Elizabeth, setting her up to become Queen of Germany (which is why her preferred crown has the German iron cross symbol). Princess Elizabeth had an arranged marriage to my father and was not free to break it on a whim.
...the subject of some of them - by carefully primed preachers - was the assertion that Edward V, his brother and his sisters were not the legitimate children of the late King: Edward IV had been 'pre-contracted' to another woman when he married Elizabeth Woodville, so that their marriage was illegal and their children were ineligible for the crown. Similarly the Duke of Clarence's children could not inherit it, since their late father was a convicted traitor. Royal Murders by Dulcie M. Ashdown, (pg. 53)

God provided a way for then Princess Elizabeth to become Queen, but she refused it, thereby removing herself from royalty and titles. She is not a person who believes in God, as she believes herself to be “God”. A monarch is placed by God and it should be no surprise that she was removed by God, even if her removal was accompanied by a perceived insult, but God was sending her and her debauched family a message. In the event that King Edward VIII had legitimate children which was expected of him in 1933, Princess Elizabeth would never have been Queen of England. By this agreement, Princess Elizabeth was ensured a throne - either England or Germany or both. This is ample consideration for a valid contract. Remember, it was believed that Edward, Prince of Wales, a single man, would one day marry a respectable woman to serve as Queen and have children of his own. In 1933, no one knew that he would fail in his duties and marry a low class twice divorced American also of questionable sexuality. When she failed to keep the agreement, her family lost all rights to the throne, all royal titles and privileges, and my family gained it. She has no rights over me in any way, but because of her defective DNA she has an inability to comprehend the change intellectually. Emotionally, she knows, but intellectually, she cannot grasp this. Besides being autistic, obsessive compulsive,
Section 4 Page 25

suffering from Asperger Syndrome and psychosis, she has the genetic flaws carried in the defunct once royal bloodline God was so anxious to replace. The reason they planned World War III around me as the centerpiece is some of the evidence they believed me to be the heir to the throne. When they murdered my older brother, I became Queen, and it took me several years of speaking with them on a daily basis before I understood what exactly it was these “high-powered” people wanted from me. I knew they must have wanted something they did not possess, but I could not figure out what that could possibly be, until no other answer was possible. Hitler became the King of the United Kingdom and of Germany which was not part of the United Kingdom. These are the “two crowns” that Guy and Elie had in mind for themselves. Germany was a separate kingdom which would only fall under the banner of the United Kingdom in the event the marriage between Hitler’s son and Princess Elizabeth took place. Ordinarily, an illegitimate offspring could not claim royal blood.
In 1830, when Victoria was eleven, the death of “uncle King” brought the Princess even closer to the throne. The new King, her sixty-five-year uncle William, had sired ten children, all illegitimate; Victoria, accordingly, was Heir to the British Crown. Dreadnought: Britain, Germany, and the Coming of the Great War by Robert K. Massie. (pp. 4)

Besides King James I, the one exception for persons of questionable birth taking the throne was made in the contract with Hitler and King Edward VIII because there was illegitimacy on both sides.
First, King James I of England was a devout believer in the "divine right of kings," a philosophy ingrained in him by his mother, Mary Stuart. Mary Stuart may have been having an affair with her Italian secretary, David Rizzio, at the time she conceived James. There is a better than even chance that James was the product of adultery. Apparently, enough evidence of such conduct on the part of Mary Stuart and David Rizzio existed to cause various Scot nobles, including Mary's own husband, King Henry, to drag David Rizzio from Mary's supper table and execute him. The Scot nobles hacked and slashed at the screaming Rizzio with knives and swords, and then threw him off a balcony to the courtyard below where he landed with a sickening smack. In the phrase of that day, he had been scotched. Mary did have affairs with other men, such as the Earl of Bothwell. She later tried to execute her husband in a gunpowder explosion that shook all of Edinburgh. King Henry survived the explosion only to be suffocated later that same night. The murderers were never discovered. Mary was eventually beheaded at the order of her cousin, Elizabeth I of England. http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=123096

This exception to the rule, did not eliminate royal standards. The monarchy is divine providence, and man does not control it. God wanted a new royal bloodline for good reason. To make an exception in the particular case with Hitler and Prince Edward was not a change in the general rule that illegitimate heirs were not considered royal. Hitler’s parents were married. The entire circumstances of this change in house from House of Windsor to House of Rothschild was both for the good of both the United Kingdom and Germany, and for the fate of the future of mankind. God, alone, knew what He was thinking and what He was doing. In retrospect, God’s decision to change royal houses was clearly the right decision.
Section 4 Page 26

Any illegitimacy exception involved in the King Edward VII-Hitler agreement was not transferable posthumously or retroactively to parties who were not party to the original contract. It was not a contract in which some outside party could intervene just because he or she wanted to be a monarch and felt that God did not know what He was doing or had a right to make any change He desired. God made any exception, in order to choose the best available person and his bloodline to accomplish His will. He also wanted to send a message to the formerly royal bloodline about WHY they lost it. It is God perrogative as to who reigned in His kingdoms, and it was God who wanted the change in royal houses. Hitler had talent from which the United Kingdom would have benefited. Look at them today! They have lost everything they ever symbolized.
"In fifteen years that have followed this resolve, he (‘the former corporal and house-painter’) has succeeded in restoring Germany to the most powerful position in Europe, and not only has he restored the position of his country, but he has even, to a very great extent, reversed the results of the Great War ... the vanquished are in process of becoming the victors and the victors the vanquished ... whatever else may be thought about these exploits they are certainly among the most remarkable in the whole history of the world. "... and the achievement by which the tables have been turned upon the complacent, feckless and purblind victors deserves to be reckoned a prodigy in the history of the world and a prodigy which is inseparable from the personal exertions of life of a single man .... Those who have met Hitler face to face in public, business, or on social terms, have found a highly competent, cool, wellinformed functionary with an agreeable manner, a discerning smile, and few have been unaffected by a subtle personal magnetism. Nor is this impression merely the dazzle of power. He exerted it on his companions at every stage in his struggle, even when his fortunes were in the lowest depths .... One may dislike Hitler’s system and yet admire his patriotic achievement. If our country were defeated I hope we should find a champion as admirable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among the nations. "There must not be lacking in our leadership something of that spirit of the Austrian corporal who, when all had fallen into ruins about him, and when Germany seemed to have fallen forever into chaos, did not hesitate to march forth against the vast array of victorious nations and has already turned the tables so decisively upon them." (Churchill, quoted by E. Hughes, "Churchill - British Bulldog - his career in War and Peace", p. 140, 141, 144, 167) http://globalfire.tv/nj/03en/history/whowasah.htm

GOD CREATES A MONARCH; NOT MAN
Daniel 2:20 Daniel answered and said, Blessed be the name of God for ever and ever: for wisdom and might are his: 21 And he changeth the times and the seasons: he removeth kings, and setteth up kings: he giveth wisdom unto the wise, and knowledge to them that know understanding: 22 He revealeth the deep and secret things: he knoweth what is in the darkness, and the light dwelleth with him. ----

Section 4 Page 27

William’s reign was filled with references to his own preminence. “There is only one ruler in the Reich and I am he. I tolerate no other, “ he said in 1891. The sovereign, he told a military banquet in 1897, bears a “terrible responsibility to the Creator alone, from which no man, no minister, no parliament, no nation, can free him.” Dreadnought: Britain, Germany, and the Coming of the Great War by Robert K. Massie. (pp. 105)

The Rothschilds are of royal blood from the Merovingian line. The Rothschilds, although Satanic, inadvertently, were doing God’s will by installing a person with strong national loyalty as monarch: Adolf Hitler, a well respected and proven leader of people.
Hitler created a happy nation, David Lloyd George revealed! "Yes, Heil Hitler. I, too, say that because he is truly a great man." (1) "I spoke with Hitler ... In Nürnberg he, Hitler, declared it rightly, that his political movement has created a new Germany. It is not the Germany of the first decade after the war, prostrated, despondent and bowed down in grief and impotence. It is now filled with hope and trust, filled with a new sense of significance and determination to lead its own life without the interference of foreign influences. For the first time since the war, a general feeling of security and peace prevail. The people are happier. Throughout the land is evident an attitude of universal joy and delight. It is a much happier Germany. I could see that everywhere, and Englishmen I met during my journey, who knew Germany well, were equally much impressed with the great change. That wonderful phenomenon was accomplished by one man ... This is the fame of mind of the young Germans. With nearly a religious fervor they believe in their movement and in their leader. This impressed me more than anything else that I experienced during my short visit in that new Germany. A refreshing new atmosphere of an awakening, so uncommonly effective in the unity of that nation. Catholics and Protestants, Prussians and Bavarians, employer and worker, rich and poor have been united into one nation. Confessions of faith, clans - or class rule and class-extraction can no longer cleave that nation. There is a passion, a sacred fire, a striving for unity, born out of hard necessity." (2) (1) Said Lloyd George, K. Hierl, "In the Service for Germany", p. 163 (2) Wrote Lloyd George in an article, published in the "Daily Express", 17 September 1936). Lloyd George (British Prime Minister 1916-1922) was a hardliner against Germany in WWI http://globalfire.tv/nj/03en/history/whowasah.htm

There are many examples in the Bible of God using evil to destroy His enemies.
Ps 34:21 Evil shall slay the wicked: and they that hate the righteous shall be desolate.

By foreknowledge, God knew he would have his choice of a righteous Christian monarch through Hitler’s future descendants. Being omniscient, He also knew that the Windsor’s DNA was totally polluted, degenerated, and had no future.
Section 4 Page 28

From King David to Baron David: The genealogical connections between Baron Guy de Rothschild and Baroness Alix de Rothschild http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0961057831/loebfamilytree

A monarch has a unique position in the world: peerless and answerable to God, and God, alone. God selects a monarch and a royal line and He changes it when He sees fit. There is a spiritual component to the office that God, and God alone, ordains the rightful monarch - not man. God must weed through all the details, and select the monarch of his choosing based on character. Queen Victoria’s family practices of human sacrifice, incest, pedophilia, and many other atrocities was evidence that this royal line did not even answer to God, and God had His right to bring that royal line to a close. Many males suffered from fatal haemophilia and severe mental disorders. The Windsor royal line was finished. With the help of the Rothschilds, God decided to change the royal line. Hitler was a good choice with his wealth of talent and leadership skills. A rightful monarch is preordained. During the selection for King Saul’s replacement, a prophet was sent to the House of Jesse to choose a king. David was not man’s choice, but God’s.
1 Samuel; 16 1 And the LORD said unto Samuel, How long wilt thou mourn for Saul, seeing I have rejected him from reigning over Israel? fill thine horn with oil, and go, I will send thee to Jesse the Bethlehemite: for I have provided me a king among his sons. 2 And Samuel said, How can I go? if Saul hear it, he will kill me. And the LORD said, Take an heifer with thee, and say, I am come to sacrifice to the LORD. 3 And call Jesse to the sacrifice, and I will shew thee what thou shalt do: and thou shalt anoint unto me him whom I name unto thee. 4 And Samuel did that which the LORD spake, and came to Bethlehem. And the elders of the town trembled at his coming, and said, Comest thou peaceably? 5 And he said, Peaceably: I am come to sacrifice unto the LORD: sanctify yourselves, and come with me to the sacrifice. And he sanctified Jesse and his sons, and called them to the sacrifice. 6 And it came to pass, when they were come, that he looked on Eliab, LORD'S anointed is before him. and said, Surely the

7 But the LORD said unto Samuel, Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature; because I have refused him: for the LORD seeth not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart. 8 Then Jesse called Abinadab, and made him pass before Samuel. And he said, Neither hath the LORD chosen this. 9 Then Jesse made Shammah to pass by. And he said, Neither hath the LORD chosen this. 10 Again, Jesse made seven of his sons to pass before Samuel. And Samuel said unto Jesse, The LORD hath not chosen these.

Section 4 Page 29

11 And Samuel said unto Jesse, Are here all thy children? And he said, There remaineth yet the youngest, and, behold, he keepeth the sheep. And Samuel said unto Jesse, Send and fetch him: for we will not sit down till he come hither. 12 And he sent, and brought him in. Now he was ruddy, and withal of a beautiful countenance, and goodly to look to. And the LORD said, Arise, anoint him: for this is he. 13 Then Samuel took the horn of oil, and anointed him in the midst of his brethren: and the Spirit of the LORD came upon David from that day forward. So Samuel rose up, and went to Ramah. 14 But the Spirit of the LORD departed from Saul, and an evil spirit from the LORD troubled him.

King Saul, a handsome tall man was man’s choice to be king, and he turned out to be a mistake. After serving as King, God rejected him, and replaced him with an unlikely person - young David. In a Christian theocracy, man is not free to throw out God’s choice. The House of Saxe-Coberg-Gotha and the Windsors hid their sin from the world, but God was very well aware of them. It is not an accident that the Windsors/Mountbattens are and have been intellectually and anatomically sexually challenged as the result of a curse from God. It was a sign from God.
2 Chronicles 10: 6 And king Rehoboam took counsel with the old men that had stood before Solomon his father while he yet lived, saying, What counsel give ye me to return answer to this people? 7 And they spake unto him, saying, If thou be kind to this people, and please them, and speak good words to them, they will be thy servants for ever. 8 But he forsook the counsel which the old men gave him, and took counsel with the young men that were brought up with him, that stood before him. 9 And he said unto them, What advice give ye that we may return answer to this people, which have spoken to me, saying, Ease somewhat the yoke that thy father did put upon us? 10 And the young men that were brought up with him spake unto him, saying, Thus shalt thou answer the people that spake unto thee, saying, Thy father made our yoke heavy, but make thou it somewhat lighter for us; thus shalt thou say unto them, My little finger shall be thicker than my father's loins. Jeremiah 22: 24 As I live, saith the LORD, though Coniah the son of Jehoiakim king of Judah were the signet upon my right hand, yet would I pluck thee thence; 25 And I will give thee into the hand of them that seek thy life, and into the hand of them whose face thou fearest, even into the hand of Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon, and into the hand of the Chaldeans. 26 And I will cast thee out, and thy mother that bare thee, into another country, where ye were not born; and there shall ye die. [King Edward VIII - the sins of the fathers are visited

on the children or “generational sin”. Queen Victoria was also sin ladened and mentally ill.]
Section 4 Page 30

27 But to the land whereunto they desire to return, thither shall they not return. 28 Is this man Coniah a despised broken idol? is he a vessel wherein is no pleasure? wherefore are they cast out, he and his seed, and are cast into a land which they know not? 29 O earth, earth, earth, hear the word of the LORD. 30 Thus saith the LORD, Write ye this man childless, a man that shall not prosper in his days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah.

“My little finger shall be thicker than my father's loins,” accurately describes the immature sexual organs of many Windsors, especially Charles Mountbatten which is one of the sources of his many murderous rampages. The plan to remove the crown from the House of Saxe-Coberg-Gotha (Hanover) was in place well before Hitler was born, and the Rothschilds legally and spiritually accomplished that goal. The family did not stick to its original plan because certain family members and certain Rothschild houses were simply too greedy. No matter how wealthy and celebrated they were, it was “never enough.” GOD CANNOT TOLERATE SIN FOREVER God did not alter His decision because of the rebelliousness of man. His decision stood, and I am now the Queen of the United Kingdom and Germany, as well as other nations, like Israel. No man can alter a divine appointment. No man is to interfere in the work of a righteous king, but the Houses of Saxe-Coberg-Gotha and Windsor are dead, and the world must adjust to the change. There was good reason to eliminate the Windsors. They too, practice human sacrifice, cannibalism, pedophilia, and other unspeakable acts. The old has been cast off into outer darkness - never to return, never to revive - no matter how ambitious anyone with that bloodline is. This is true of all other British royal lines, like the Stewarts. They are finished. The House of Saxe-Coberg-Gotha/Windsor was unrighteous, and suffered the appropriate consequences.
Ge 6:3 And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man,

King Edward VII was not fit to be king, and Queen Victoria was negligent in her duties not to pass him over. Known as the “Prince of Pleasure,”King Edward VII, was an abomination to God with his heinous sins and defilement of all that was royal. His relationship with Keppel, was just one of his insults to the God who placed him on the throne, but the Keppel story was enough to remove him. He was intellectually and spiritually inferior, but it was his own character that was his ruination. Keppel did not have the power to remove him. He removed himself.
Prime Minster Gladstone: ‘To speak in rude and general terms, ‘ he confided, with rare succinctness, to a colleague, ‘the Queen is invisible, and the Prince of Wales is not respected.’ The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 3) Section 4 Page 31

During their eldest son’s boyhood, Victoria and Albert, all aglow with good Coburg intentions, had decreed that Bertie - as he was known in the family - ‘ought to be accustomed early to work with [them], to have great confidence shown him, that he should be early instructed into the affairs of state.’ Their admirable resolve had been short-lived. In spite of - or rather, because of a system of educational force-feeding, Bertie had never matched up to their exacting standards. He had emerged from those years of intensive study as an amiable but far from intellectual young man. Of Prince Albert’s earnestness, industriousness and highmindedness, he showed no trace. He lived the disapproving Queen would point out, purely for pleasure. The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pp. 4-5) Not only did she consider her son to be lacking in intellect but she found him irresponsible, immature, and indiscreet. The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 5) Albert Edward, Prince of Wales, was a hedonist from the crown of his already balding head to the soles of his elegantly shod feet. The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 7) The pace of his life was frenetic. Easily bored, averse to reading, wary of intellectual talk, lacking in application, hating desk-work, unappreciative of serious music or anything other than the most blandly representational painting, he flung himself into a ceaseless round of amusements. The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 8) ... he would indulge in one activity which he preferred above all others. For more than racing, shooting, yachting, gambling or eating, the Prince of Wales enjoyed making love. The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 9) It was in this happy hunting ground that the Prince of Wales was able to assuage his appetites. The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 17) How much did Alexandra know about her husband’s unfaithfulness? ‘I often think her lot is no easy one, ‘ wrote Queen Victoria as early as 1864, when the couple had been married for less than two years, but she is very fond of Bertie, though not blind. The Princess would have noticed what others noticed: how her husband was paying too much attention to a certain ‘Madame von B’ at Sandringham, or how he was spooning with Lady Filmer’ at Ascot. She would have heard of his involvement with various Russian beauties when he was in St Petersburg in 1866 and of his suppers with ‘female Paris notorieties’ when he visited France The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 17) Bertie was not quite fourteen when his dawning interest in the opposite sex first became apparent. In 1855 Queen Victoria – accompanied by Prince Albert and their two eldest children the Princess Royal and the Prince of Wales – paid a state visit to Paris. At the brilliant court of the Second Empire, presided over by the worldly Napoleon III and the beautiful Empress Eugenie, the young Prince first experienced a way of life which he would one day make his own. In the person of the Emperor of the French, Bertie discovered an adult who accepted him for what he was. Her was someone who seemed to take an unashamed delight in the thing in which he delighted; who loved Section 4 Page 32

show and colour and movement; who lived, quite naturally and openly, for the pleasure. To the youngster, whose life had always been narrow, repressed and dedicated to self-improvement, Napoleon III’s tolerance and sense of enjoyment were a revelation. This, surely, was how life was meant to be lived. The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 10) … the young man had shown precious little sigh of developing into the sort of enlightened sage of his father’s fond aspirations. In fact, in that tug-o-war between Coburg and Hanover for control of the boy’s character, his Hanoverian ancestry was winning hands down. Every year thee regrettable characteristics were becoming more pronounced. The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 13) There was only one possible remedy. An early marriage decided the Prince Consort’s great dream of fashioning the perfect, unsullied heir had been shattered. Not only was the Prince of Wales proving himself sadly lacking intellectually, but he was about to go the way of Queen Victoria’s unspeakable uncles. The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 13) SNIP …if he married a nice wife that he likes, she will deep him straight and as he is too weak to keep from sin for virtue’s sake, he will only keep out of it from other motives, and surely a wife will be the strongest? The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 13) ‘All the world and glory of it, whatever is most seductive, has always been offered to the Prince of Wales of his day…’ wrote that great analyst of British Constitution, Alter Bagehot. This had been true for the previous Prince of Wales, that celebrated debauchee who became first Prince Regent and then King George IV, and it was to be true for the future Prince of Wales, the capricious young man who was to become King Edward VIII, and then Duke of Windsor. But neither of these princes availed themselves of the world’s glories and seductions with quite as much uninhibited zest as did Queen Victoria’s heir. The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 15) Nor was Alexandra clever, or at least sharp, enough to satisfy him. She had very little brain. The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 15) But none of this can explain the Prince of Wale’s tireless extramarital activity. The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 16) Another factor was that he was granted every opportunity for infidelity. Snip There opportunities were everywhere. Mid-Victorian respectability, so studiously encouraged by Victoria and Albert, was largely confined to one layer of society – the middle classes. The aristocracy, as the Queen only too frequently pointed out to her lusty heir, was anything but respectable. It was quite given over to ‘frivolity, the love of pleasure, self-indulgence and Section 4 Page 33

idleness. It was in this happy hunting ground that the Prince of Wales was able to assuage his appetites. The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pp. 16-17) On one occasion the Prince was obliged to buy back some letters which he had written to Madame Giulia Barucci, one of the great courtesans of the Second Empire, who was pleased to describe herself as ‘the greatest whore in the world’. At the same time he was being asked for money, in an altogether less menacing fashion, on behalf of Lady Susan Vane Tempest who – not being the greatest whore in the world – was apparently about to bear his child. The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pg. 18)

This royal line has come to an end. It was time for a change. I am that change. RIGHTEOUS MONARCHS FOLLOW GOD’S RULES
Magna Carta TranslationA translation of Magna Carta as confirmed by Edward I with his seal in 1297[Preamble] EDWARD by the grace of God, King of England, Lord of Ireland, and Duke of Guyan, to all Archbishops, Bishops, etc. We have seen the Great Charter of the Lord HENRY, sometimes King of England, our father, of the Liberties of England, in these words: Henry by the grace of God, King of England, Lord of Ireland, Duke of Normandy and Guyan, and Earl of Anjou, to all Archbishops, Bishops, Abbots, Priors, Earls, Barons, Sheriffs, Provosts, Officers, and to all Bailiffs and other our faithful Subjects , which shall see this present Charter, Greeting. Know ye that we, unto the honour of Almighty God, and for the salvation of the souls of our progenitors and successors, Kings of England, to the advancement of holy Church, and amendment of our Realm, of our meer and free will, have given and granted to all Archbishops, Bishops, Abbots, Priors, Earls, Barons, and to all freemen of this our realm, these liberties following, to be kept in our kingdom of England for ever. http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/featured_documents/magna_carta/translation.html

Elizabeth Mountbatten is NOT the Queen of England. Even her actions testify to this fact.
Met Police officers to be 'microchipped' by top brass in Big Brother style tracking scheme Last updated at 10:46am on 10th April 2008 Met Chief Sir Ian Blair could be among 31,000 officers to receive the new electronic tracking device Every single Metropolitan police officer will be 'microchipped' so top brass can monitor their movements on a Big Brother style tracking scheme, it can be revealed today. According to respected industry magazine Police Review, the plan - which affects all 31,000 serving officers in the Met, including Sir Ian Blair - is set to replace the unreliable Airwave radio system currently used to help monitor officer's movements. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=558597&in_page_id= 1770 Britons 'could be microchipped like dogs in a decade' by DAN NEWLING - More by this author » Last updated at 00:11am on 30th October 2006 Section 4 Page 34

Experts predict that humans could soon have ID chips implanted under the skin Human beings may be forced to be 'microchipped' like pet dogs, a shocking official report into the rise of the Big Brother state has warned. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=413345&in_page_id= 1770

She is descended from a long line of loons.
The British monarchy, in the years before Victoria’s accession, had come on hard times. Queen Victoria’s immediate predecessors on the throne - George III, George IV, and William IV - have been escribed as “an imbecile, a profligate, and a buffon.” Dreadnought: Britain, Germany, and the Coming of the Great War by Robert K. Massie.(pp. 3-4)

She is different than they. She lost her royalty. Add inbreeding and syphilis, and hereditary brain atrophy to this line, and you get cannibalistic vampiric mass murderers. Elizabeth and her lunatic son who could be described as a buffon, proliferate, and an imbecile, and still he would not be adequately described in the negative; he has no positives. Repulsive. He has not one redeeming quality. He is the kind of person one would enjoy killing. He will only be accomplished when he dies. He is not even mentally competent to enter into a marriage contract as he cannot even comprehend what marriage is. He severely lacks cognitive ability to analyze or learn. He is immersed in lewd, crude and filthy toilet play, feces, bodily eliminations, cheap pornography, and bloodshed. He is infantile and just plain stupid. His innumerable defects have been hidden from the public by his handlers. The Illuminati long ago planned to use and eliminate him. The movie, Charly, starting Cliff Robertson, was written to express the mental deficiencies of Elizabeth and her son, who inherited her low intelligence. PC is about his reality.
Politically Correctness - a definition, "Political Correctness" is a doctrine fostered by a delusional and illogical liberal minority that is rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to "pick up a turd by the clean end". http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=97944

God had finally had enough of the Hanover line who have been tormenting the world for centuries with their lunacy.
The basic principle upon which the Declaration rests is that colonists, as British citizens, believed they were entitled to the rights and privileges granted by the Magna Carta, and the British Bill of Rights of 1689. Among other things, these documents established that the King was not above the law, that the people, represented in parliament, had a right to endorse or reject taxation, and that citizens were entitled to a trial by jury of their peers. Additionally, the Declaration relied on precedent: most British colonies had enjoyed self-rule and had been governed through their own legislative bodies since their founding. By 1774, most of the colonists that had once protested "no taxation without representation" found themselves without any representation whatsoever, neither in Parliament nor Section 4 Page 35

in any colonial house of representation. Towards the end of the list of abuses, the Declaration focuses attention on a few specific incidents that demonstrate the King's disregard for colonial life and liberty, the danger of colonists remaining divided on the issue of independence, and the preparations being made by Great Britain for an all-out war. http://www.sparknotes.com/history/american/declaration/section2.rhtml Declaration of Independence IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776. The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen United States of America, When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one humans to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the Earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident: all men are created equal, they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. http://www.unique-design.net/library/god/patriot/jefferson.html

In America, God established a nation where freedom of religion was allowed to flourish. He could not have the state dictate the moving of the Spirit of God. The Church of England rejected its foundation and its faith to accommodate the sins of its monarch and aristocracy. But He held on to the monarchy in the United Kingdom because He wanted to have HIS righteous representative on the throne in the last days. The sinners in the United Kingdom do not want God’s leadership because the ruling class is out of control and does not want to be reined in. Homosexuals have taken over the intelligence departments of the United Kingdom because they were the only ones who would keep the sexual perversions of the Windsors secret. A pagan tree worshipper Satanist Druid is Archbishop of the Church of England because Elizabeth is not the true Queen. The British cannot complain about the royal house being turned over to a German. The Hanover family from which the Windsors descended were German.
Queen Victoria was mostly German. Her father, Edward, Duke of Kent, fourth son of King George III was a Hanoverian, a descendant of George Louis, Eliector of hanover, brought to England in 1714 and placed on the throne as King George I to ensure the Protestan succession. All of Queen Victoria's Hanoverian forebears - King George II, his son Frederick, Prince of Wales, and his son King George III - married German wives, reinforcing the German strain on her father’s side. Queen Victoria’s mother, Princess Victoria Mary Louisa of Saxe-Coberg, was German. Queen Victoria herself then redoubled the German fraction in the royal family by marrying her German cousin, Prince Albert of Saxe-Coberg, the son of her mothers older brother. Dreadnought: Britain, Germany, and the Coming of the Great War by Robert K. Massie. (pp. 3)

It was not a huge leap to change one German monarchial family for another. Hitler, too, descended from the Merovingians, the European royal bloodline.
The Merovingian Kings Section 4 Page 36

http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~stephan/Rulers/merovingian.html

KAISER ADOLF I OF AND GERMANY AND KING HENRY IX OF UNITED THE UNITED KINGDOM As kings are ordained by God, this transfer of royalty from the House of Windsor to the House of Rothschild has been repeatedly confirmed as God’s will, and the English know it beyond a reasonable doubt. Their pride has stopped them from acknowledging an American Queen because they always intended to regain America as a colony, and this did not fit in their plan. An Americanborn Queen fits in God’s plan, and that is all that is important. The last legitimate king the United Kingdom had that was accurately reported in the media was King Edward VIII. Hitler was still working with Duke of Windsor for the vision of a better England. (Since the frauds took over, England has done nothing but deteriorate.) Here is some documentation to support his alliance with Edward, former king, and his belief that Hitler would continue to use him as a leader in England:
During World War II he served as Governor of the Bahamas, where he was plagued by rumours and accusations that he was pro-Nazi. He reputedly told an acquaintance, "After the war is over and Hitler will crush the Americans... we'll take over... They [the Commonwealth] don't want me as their king, but I'll soon be back as their leader."[52] He told a journalist that "it would be a tragic thing for the world if Hitler was overthrown."[52] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_VIII_abdication_crisis

Prior to the abdication, King Edward VIII was politically astute enough to see that the Communism espoused by the Jews would eventually destroy the British culture, too. He had a solution to the threat of certain warfare with Germany. King Edward VIII was a Germanophile, who spoke high German and spoke German better than he spoke English. He, in his role as king, chose to enhance the kingdom by bringing Germany into the alliance to ensure a strong future for his nations. Rather than fear Germany’s rising military power, he wanted to join the United Kingdom’s power with theirs. With peabrain pretenders living on royal property masquerading as God’s anointed, England has lost all its freedoms including those guaranteed by the Magna Carta, and they are too foolish to know what is good for them because they are blinded by pride. Royalty is established to provide a vision for the future of the country and preserve the traditions of the past that are pure and just. God used a family of unconventional but clever people, to say the least, to orchestrate this change in royal families, but God was in favor of the results of their unconventional work, to a degree. Besides being leaders and able to implement large long range plans, The Rothschilds met another need God had because of their financial genius and world power.
Hag 2:8 The silver is mine, and the gold is mine, saith the LORD of hosts.

The one world government plan of Satan included the amassing of all the wealth in the hands of one person. God also planned all along to gather the wealth of the world in His hand. He knew he would have to use sinners to get it, then He pulled a switch, and had a predestinated Christian, dedicated to the principles of freedom, righteousness, and high standards, waiting in the wings to be his final monarch at the end of the history of man.
Section 4 Page 37

Pr 13:22 A good man leaveth an inheritance to his children's children: and the wealth of the sinner is laid up for the just. Ps 97:2 ...righteousness and judgment are the habitation of his throne. Pr 16:12 It is an abomination to kings to commit wickedness: for the throne is established by righteousness. Pr 25:5 Take away the wicked from before the king, and his throne shall be established in righteousness. Heb 1:8 But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.

God had plans for His kingdoms, and it is my duty to hold the line against evil for them. I have done my duty regardless of the opposition I faced - all the major powers of the world against me. It is mankind which failed in their duties towards me! Just as natural man would have skipped over David as king, natural man might also try to denigrate Hitler as king material, but God saw in him a man who would fight his satanic relatives to defend the right of the Christian church to exist as Hitler’s relatives wanted the communist model for Europe - the systematic destruction of all belief in God. Hitler was willing to fight the hard battle and use all means necessary to defend Christian culture against a Godless culture. Even fiction speaks to this point:
“The Kaiser’ll never bother us,” declared William. So long as he can dress up in splendid uniforms and parade his soldiers as if he were a child playing with toys, he’ll be absolutely harmless. He won’t make any trouble.” “Nonsense,” said Alice. “Grown men who play with real soldeirs under the mistaken idea that they’re mere toys are a menace to the civilized world.” “What a glooomy Cassandra you are, Alice!” said William, but his good-humored comment could not quite hide the note of irriation in his voice. “But I’m afraid I still think there won’t be a war.” “Churchill thinks there will be!” “Churchill’s an irresponsible warmonger!” “I don’t think there’ll be a war - for a while anyway,” I interposed as the conversation threatened to become too acrimonious. “But if war did break out I’m sure it would only be because someone flouted all the principles of civilized behavior so outrageously that we would have no choice except to intervene. After all, when there’s an open conflict between good and evil - when one’s very principles are at stake - one simply must defend what one believes to be right. There’s no better reason for fighting, in my opinion.” Penmarric by Susan Howatch, 1971, pp, 346

Churchill fought to defend the sins of the Windsors. Hitler fought to defend civilization as it was, if the truth were known. Hitler was shamanistic in his approach to religion in that he had direct
Section 4 Page 38

contact with the dark side, or Satanic side in order to understand his enemy - his Satanic cousins, but when push came to shove, he threw his weight in on defending Christianity. He needed to immerse himself in the dark side to gain information and learn to direct energy for himself instead of merely relying on others’ views. This can be researched by studying Hitler and his relationship with Martin Luther’s writings. The world knows that the “Jews” were his enemy. What they did not realize is that the Jews were COMMUNISTS, and were inadvertently funding the war machine that would be used to destroy Christian culture. The fact is that Hitler was the legitimate king, and now I am the Queen of England and Germany and other nations, including Israel. None of those fools mentioned in this document have any right or claim to them or to my vast inheritance. The fact that psychotic criminal peons, the likes of Bill and Hillary Clinton, both George Bushes, Hermann Goering and his bastard son, Alan Bersin, and Cunt Parker Bowles want what I inherited is a mute point. They didn’t inherit it. I did, and it is time for the world to fall in line with that truth as it cannot sustain under the false leadership that the planet is subjected to to this day. (Document update: January 13, 2010) I have claimed my throne, and I have informed the United Kingdom and my other nations through the United Nations that I am the last monarch of the United Kingdom as I have no heirs, nor will I name one. When I am gone, the monarchy will be dead. The country is not fit to have a monarch it refuses to properly honor and protect. The United Kingdom is wasting precious time by not acknowledging and honoring me in my rightful place. A monarchy is a theocracy, and leaving God’s will out of the picture is not optional. SPLENDID ISOLATION When England was at a crossroads, two different monarchs had two different solutions. King Edward VII, associate of the Rothschilds, wanted and planned for war. King Edward VIII wanted peace. Both had severe spiritual deficits which made them unable to lead their countries properly. Military readiness is an essential quality for any country. No king can rule without spiritual readiness. God will not deep an incompetent, morally spiritually bankrupt family forever in royal position forever. There comes a time when He rejects depraved misfits who cannot function above a reptilian brain. Quotes below are from Dreadnought: Britain, Germany, and the Coming of the Great War by Robert K. Massie. The story of the Dreadnought served as an allegory to preserve in history the shenanigans of the God-hating British royal family, and record their descent into contemptible and never ending lust for personal pleasure. Consider it a private diary for the Illuminati in which their every action - no matter how ignoble is recorded in code. The building of the ships lay the groundwork and personally shameful motives for the planned "Great War" which Bertie did not live to see. The Rothschilds in their Satanic plan (with a Godly twist) for world domination would require at least three world wars manipulated the war at a higher level, using Queen Victoria's family as puppets in a much larger show. Albert Pike, Rothschild agent foretold of future events:
Pike's Amazing Predictions Of Three World Wars Section 4 Page 39

2-1-8

Albert Pike received a vision, which he described in a letter that he wrote to Mazzini, dated August 15, 1871. This letter graphically outlined plans for three world wars that were seen as necessary to bring about the One World Order, and we can marvel at how accurately it has predicted events that have already taken place. http://www.rense.com/general80/pike.htm Conspiratorial History Conspiratorial history studies that part of history that is a product of man's planning. In conspiratorial history we are led to believe that events, such as wars and revolutions, are the result of planned events. While the conspiratorial view is not accurate for weather, volcanoes and earthquakes, it is a realistic and accurate view of the interrelationship of man and nations. Since the planning for most of these events was done in secret, we use the term conspiratorial history. That is; this history is the result of plans constructed in secret, which by definition is a conspiracy. Interestingly enough, the Conspiratorial View of History is also the Biblical View of History. Try Psalms 2 for starters.* We believe that current world events are not simply circumstantial, but the result of an organized campaign by an elite group of unseen and widely unknown world leaders. Their goal is to exercise absolute dictatorial control over the world, to establish a New World Order. http://www.threeworldwars.com/intro.htm

To drag Britain away from their successful military and defense policy "Splendid Isolation", there needed to be a motive. In the process of trying to cover up the wretched behavior of the effete Prince of Wales whose heirs were of extremely low intelligence and mental failings like himself, the Rothschilds built in a bait and switch component in which the British military would be infiltrated by a Japanese agent, British Admiral Jackie Fisher. (John Arbuthnot Fisher - Arbuthnot being code for “we are both not Queen”, in reference to Bertie’s wife, Queen Alexandra, and his paid companion - the banker’s whore - Alice Keppel. She was trying to cover both bases in case polygamy would not fly. This plot was not about narcissist Keppel and her personal desires. This plot was about Rothschild - Balfour means a walk to home plate or home rule. When pigs fly. The battle was between God and Satan fought through the Rothschild dynasty. Mrs. Keppel was not a major league player. She was not a little league player. She was a nonentity. Her services were over when she offered her virgin daughter, Violet, up for rape in order to pretend to marry Bertie by proxy and pretend to be a virgin, herself. The story is a Rothschild story and she is trash - a throw-a-way not unlike toilet paper to be used and flushed down the toilet, and it is not a royal flush - Camilla Toilet Bowl. She was paid upon Bertie’s death for her services by Ernest Cassel. “Earn us the Castle” was a Rothschild agent. The Rothschild did not do all this work for Camilla Parker Bowles or for Herman Goering and his idiot son, Alan Bersin. God did not negotiate with them. NO change in a Royal Family occurs without God’s consent. The Royal Family is ROTHSCHILD, and I am His Chosen Representative. God has his reasons.
Section 4 Page 40

How the Crown Rules the World by MARK OWEN How the Crown Rules the World There are two Crowns operant in England, one being Queen Elizabeth II. Although extremely wealthy, the Queen functions largely in a ceremonial capacity and serves to deflect attention away from the other Crown, who issues her marching orders through their control of the English Parliament. This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the Bank of England (House of Rothschild). They rule the world from the 677-acre, independent sovereign state know as The City of London, or simply 'The City.' The City is not a part of England, just as Washington, D.C. is not a part of the USA. The City is referred to as the wealthiest square mile on earth and is presided over by a Lord Mayor who is appointed annually. When the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple (Templar) Bar where she requests permission to enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into the City walking several paces behind the Mayor. http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=52&contentid=1964

Elizabeth Mountbatten, the fraud, is not Queen, and needs to be removed from God’s story and property. The House of Windsor is dead. No one should be asking why. No real Queen would give up her sovereignty:
Britain gives up legal sovereignty over European treaty by STEVE DOUGHTY, Daily Mail Britain yesterday surrendered 1,000 years of legal sovereignty in return for a European extradition treaty. Judges and magistrates across the continent will be given the power to demand the arrest and handover of British citizens simply by naming them as suspects. The pact sweeps away the right of people in this country to turn to the courts here for defence against charges abroad. Also brushed aside will be the historic principle that everyone is innocent until proven guilty, and the habeas corpus protection against unjustified imprisonment. The treaty, being rushed through as part of the war on terror, covers 32 categories ranging from fraud and rape to 'xenophobia' and ' corruption' - offences which are currently not recognised in British law. Agreement on the European arrest warrant came as the last country standing against it - Italy backed down. It is now certain to be approved at a weekend EU summit in Belgium. Tony Blair and British ministers have pushed enthusiastically for the extradition deal. But human rights activists and Eurosceptics have condemned an agreement that will abolish the powers of courts in all EU countries to resist extradition demands for the 32 crimes - beyond checking that warrants have been correctly issued. Critics point to Greece - the country that has held 12 British planespotters in jail for more than a Section 4 Page 41

month on questionable spying charges - as an example of the legal systems to which the Government is handing unprecedented powers over Britons. They say the loss of the ability to challenge extradition in a British court will end the over-riding principle of the court will end the over-riding principle of the presumption of innocence. Suspects will in effect face examination by a magistrate or judge to whom they must demonstrate their innocence under the Napoleonic code favoured in much of Europe. Another ancient right to be infringed will be habeas corpus, the right to demand the release of anyone from imprisonment unless a good reason for holding them is demonstrated in court. Extradited Britons would be at the mercy of the painfully slow legal systems in some countries. The euro warrant deal was sealed when its last opponent, Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, backed down. Italy had wanted the list of crimes cut to six, and was particularly opposed to including financial crimes. Mr Berlusconi's critics said this was because he feared extradition to Spain to face tax evasion charges. Britain and most other EU countries are likely to begin operating the system in 2004, although legislation to put it into effect will have to be agreed by Parliament. The UK first pressed for a Euro extradition scheme to get 'Costa del Crime' villains back from Spain. But Spain has now agreed an extradition treaty and no euro warrant is needed. Supporters of the agreement say it will stop suspects stretching their fight against extradition over several years, often at huge cost to taxpayers. Opponents say the inclusion of crimes like 'swindling' could mean almost anyone involved in any transaction could find themselves-being summoned. Lawyers also see dangers in the inclusion of crimes like rape that are notoriously vulnerable to abuse by those making false accusations. It is even conceivable that Greece could demand the extradition for 'xenophobia' of anyone who strongly criticises its legal system over cases like that of the planespotters. Tory spokesman Timothy Kirkhope, MEP for Yorkshire and the Humber, said: 'The warrant will extend to a very wide range of crimes and cut across national judicial systems in a way that will put many people in jeopardy and have inadequate safeguards. 'The planespotter case shows there are deep divisions in judicial systems across EU states. We all support action against terrorism but we are about to introduce a radical shake-up that has not been thought through.' Stephen Jakobi of the pressure group Fair Trials Abroad said: 'One problem is that the crimes on the list are being set by politicians who can move the goalposts at any moment. 'The system will not work unless it is applied across legal systems which work in the same way and accept the same rules.' Shadow home secretary Oliver Letwin said: 'While there is a case for a European arrest warrant in the field of terrorism, the warrant now proposed would have the dreadful effect of enabling a British citizen to be arrested for a crime which is not a crime in this country. 'It's extraordinary the Government should be sponsoring such a proposal at a time when it is not prepared to take the power to send Osama Bin Laden to the U.S. for trial if he were captured by British troops and brought to the UK.' Former Tory minister John Redwood-said: 'It's a black day for British justice and democracy. 'We were relying on the Italians to throw out this idea. We have known for some time that we could not rely on our own Government to defend the rights of British citizens.'

The Creator decides the way His story ends, - not man. Man does not interfere in God’s plan without receiving the penalty of death - spiritual death - if not physical .
Isa 55:9 - For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.

No hired hands means no hired hands.
Section 4 Page 42

Admiral Fisher worked in collusion with Rothschild prostitute, Mrs. Keppel, who was more than adequately paid for her services in assisting Japan to destroy British rule, in an attempt to overthrow God's monarchial rule. She was fortunate to throw many lavious parties, travel, buy a villa in Italy, buy a home on Grosvenor St, and live at the Ritz Hotel in Paris for an extended period on her prostitute’s bonus. Under God’s rule she was not eligible for royal status nor was she authorized to commit adultery and participate in child rape.
Re 20:14 - And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. Re 21:8 - But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

Poor management by the Rothschilds does not alter her role or the role of her pig descendants. “It ain’t you, Babe.” She has been on the stage far too long and it is time for the hook to remove her permanently. Captain Hook from Peter Pan if need be. In Rothschild spoof films 'Dracula", Mrs. Keppel is portrayed as an old witch named Queen Zimba who is not a real Queen but a demented old woman who believed herself to be someone she was not. She was a zilch, a zero, a naught, a dreaded naught.
...Kay is out in the swamp, talking to a crazy old Gypsy lady who calls herself Queen Zimba. It would seems the girl has a thing fo the occult, and later events will more than bear this out that first impression. Zimba's forecast of Kay's future is the sort of thing that would trouble most people - she says she sees Kay marrying a corpse - but Kay is strangely dismissive of the seeress' warnings. She also takes it surprisingly well when a huge rubber bat flies into the Gypsy's shack and apparently frightens the old woman literally to death. All Kay does is look guiltily and hurry back to Dark Oaks, doing her damndest to make sure no one sees her. http://www.1000misspenthours.com/reviews/reviewsa-d/sonofdracula.htm

You can see “Mrs. Keppel” as “Queen Zimba from the Rothschild perspective at 1:47 into the Son of 'Dracula" clip.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=1Ja3vYbyT0c&feature=related

Mrs. Keppel’s role in the death of King Edward VII must also be investigated as her antics after his death in code belied a foreknowledge of his death. Their relationship was over - contrary to the myth told by Keppel.
During the afternoon the King suffered a series of heart attacks. But he refused to go to bed. Section 4 Page 43

‘No, I shall not give in,’ he protested. ‘I shall go on: I shall work to the end.’ It is from this point on that the generally accepted accounts of Edward VII’s last hours are at variance with what actually happened. Queen Alexandra did not, in a gesture of touching magnanimity, send for Alice Keppel to take leave of of the King. According to the royal doctor, Sir Francis Laking, who ws in constant attendance that day, Alice had been in and out of the palace until the Queen’s arrival home and had since sent Alexandra the letter which the King had written to her at the time of his appendix operation in 1902: it was the letter in which he had said that ‘if he were dying, he felt sure that those about him would allow her to come to him.’ That, combined with the King’s request that Alice be sent for, is what forced the reluctant Queen into agreeing that Mrs Keppel should be summoned. There now followed an extraordinary scene. On arrival, the distraught Alice curtseyed to the Queen and Princes Victoria and was then asked by the king to sit down beside him. Stroking her hand, he told her not to cry. Calling to Alexandra, who was standing at the window with her back to this little tableau, the King said, ‘You must kiss her. You must kiss Alice.’ Fighting down, one imagines, her distaste, the Queen presented her cheek to Mrs. Keppel, although she was afterwards to deny that she had done any such thing. Both women then sat down beside the King. His mind, says Laking, was by now beginning to wander. He began fumbling for his false teeth and seemed uneasy at not having them in. Suddenly, quite forgetting that he was in the company of the Queen, Princess Victoria and Mrs. Keppel, he said, ‘I want to p___.’ ‘What is that he said?’ demanded the deaf Alexandra. ‘He is asking Ma’am for a pencil,’ was Laking’s adroit reply. Mercifully, at this point, the King slumped into another bout of unconsciousness. Getting up, Alexandra drew Laking aside and hissed, ‘Get that woman away.’ This was easier said than done. By now Alice Keppel was hysterical. Nothing would induce her to leave the side of her dying lover. Only on being told, very firmly, that His Majesty had asked to be left alone with the Queen, did the demented Alice allow herself to be led out by Princess Victoria. Shrieking at the top of her voice for ‘all the pages and footmen in the passage’ to hear, Alice kept repeating, ‘I never did any harm, there was nothing wrong between us. [Jer 3:3 ... thou hadst a whore’s forehead, thou refusedst to be ashamed.] What is to become of me?’ All Princess Victoria’s efforts to soothe her were hopeless; in ‘a wild fit of hysterics’ Alice was carried into Frederick Ponsomby’s room. She remained there for several hours. ‘Altogether,’ wrote an indignant Lord Esher, ‘it was a painful and rather theatrical exhibition, and out never to have happened.’ It must also have been an extremely macabre one. King Edward VII died just before midnight. He was in his sixty-ninth year. When it was over Alexandra, ‘in a terrible state of despair’, blurted out her feelings about Mrs Keppel, and about the King to Sir Francis Laking. ‘I would not have kissed her,’ she said, ‘if he had not bade me. But I would have done anything he asked of me. Twelve [sic] years ago, when I was so angry about Lady Warwick, and the King expostulated with me and said I should get him into the divorce court, I told him Section 4 Page 44

once for all that he might have all the women he wished, and I would not say a word; and I have done everything since that he desired me to do about them. He was the whole of my life and, now he is dead, nothing matters. And Lord Esher, invited by Alexandra to take a last look at her husband’s body a few days later, has some interesting observations to make on her attitude to the King’s death. He notes, ‘The Queen talked for half an hour, just as she always talked to me, with only a slight diminution of her natural gaiety, but with a tenderness with betrayed all the love in her soul, and oh! so natural feeling that she had got him there altogether to herself [author’s italics]. In a way she seemed, and is, I am convinced, happy. It is the womanly happiness of complete possession of the man who was the love of her youth, and - as I fervently believe - all her life.’ After all, Alexandra is reputed to have said to a friend after Edward VII’s death, ‘he always loved me the best.’ As for the legend about her saintly gesture towards Alice Keppel: how did that originate? Now with the Queen. Not even with those devoted members of her entourage who were always anxious of ‘the beloved lady’ to be presented in the best possible light. It originated with Alice Keppel. Once her lover had died, Alice, in an effort to safeguard her future, had hurried to Marlborough House to sign her name in the book. But the new monarchs, King George V and Queen Mary, were having none of her: ‘orders had been given that she should not be allowed to so s o . . . ’ Seeing the way the wind was blowing, the astute Alice put about the story of how the all-forgiving Queen had summoned her to the dying King’s bedside, of how Alexandra had ‘fallen upon her neck and wept with her’, and how she had promised that the royal family would ‘look after her’. ‘Mrs Keppel,’ declared Esher, who had heard that truth from Edward VII’s secretary, Francis Knollys, ‘has lied about the whole affair.’

The King in Love: Edward VII’s Mistresses: Lillie Langtry, Daisy Warwick, Alice Keppel and others by Theo Aronson 1988, (pp. 251-3)

DREADNOUGHT Before World War I, the British Navy ruled the seas.
The supremacy of the British Navy was stamped indelibly on the history of the nineteenth century ... (Introduction) Both the naval supremacy and the peace endured while warships changed beyond recognition: wooden hulls were transformed to iron and steel; masts disappeared as sail gave way to steam; bottle-shaped, muzzle-loading buns were replaced by powerful, turret-mounted naval rifles of far greater range and accuracy. Something else remained constant as well: through all those years British seamen exuded a confidence higher than arrogance, an assurance that was bred and passed along by the seventeen thousand men who served at Trafalgar in Nelson's oak-hulled levianthans. (pp. xiii-xiv) Historically, the mission of the British Fleet has been to protect the Home Islands from invasion Section 4 Page 45

and to guard the trade routes and colonies of the Empire (pg. xiv) The USS Brooklyn, an armored cruiser of 9,200 tons was the pride of the United States Navy. SNIP The American ship used electricity to hoist shells from magazines to guns and to rotate turrets. "We are at least seven or eight years behind," lamented the Chronicle. "Her equipment is so admirable that I blush with shame that only one of our British men of war is fitted with electrical shell hoists." The United States officers were exceptionally polite, never failing to raise their white-covered caps in greeting over the water." (pp. xix-xx) [Referring to ships foreign and domestic visible on England's waters for participation in Queen Victoria's Diamond Jubilee] Disappointment focussed on the next ship in line, a gray vessel with two red stripes around her funnel, S.M.S. (Seine Majestat Schiff) Koneg Wilhelm (King William) of the Imperial German Navy. SNIP Rear Admiral Prince Henry of Prussia, who was aboard the King Wilhelm, "I deeply regret that I have no better ship to place at your disposal whilst other nations shine with their fine vessels. This is the result of those unpatriotic fellows [William was condemning the Reichstag] who opposed construction of the most necessary ships." (pg .xx) The British Empire, guarded by this fleet, was the largest in the history of the world. All this had been won and was held by sea power. (pp.xx) A single major defeat had marred the steady progression: between 1776 and 1881 the North American colonies had successfully revolted and broken away. England bore this shock and moved forward. (pp.xxi) The British Empire was a sea empire. (pp.xxi)

If Britain had not ruled the seas, the nation would not have survived. America had not yet reached its full military strength.
Without the navy, Britain was instantly vulnerable. SNIP But with control of the seas, all was reversed. While Britain maintained naval supremacy, no Continental power, no matter how large or well-trained its army, could touch the British homeland. With naval supremacy, Britain acquired diplomatic freedom. British statesmen and diplomats could afford to stand back and regard with detachment the rivalries and hatreds which consumed the youth and treasuries of Continental powers facing each other across land frontiers. Few European statesmen or military men understood Great Britain or the British Empire. They were puzzled when they studied the small island, with its ridiculous army, its aloof, almost patronizing manner, its pretension to be above the passions and squabbles which dominated their days. And yet, for all its smallness and seeming fragility, there Britain stood, serene, unchallengeable, with a range of action which was immense; which had in the past toppled Continental giants. Foreign military officers were particularly incredulous. With an army which Section 4 Page 46

was only an insignificant fraction of their own, Britain ruled a quarter of the globe. To German officers especially, representing the mightiest army in the world, it seemed absurd that Britain should claim to rule India's 300 million people with an army of seventy thousand. Yet in India, Britain continued to rule. If British naval supremacy had made it possible for the island kingdom to remain outside the web of Continental rivalries, Britain remained a European state. Political events on the great land mass across the twenty miles of water that separated dover from Calais were of more importance to Britons than what happened in Brazil. By 1897, Europe was divided into two alliance systems: Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy confronted France and Russia. England had taken no position and, under Lord Salisbury, her Prime Minister, did not intend to do so. This policy of aloofness Lord Salisbury had called "Splendid Isolation." England's enemy since the Middle Ages had been France. Through the wars of the Plantagenets, against Louis XIV, Louis XV, and Napoleon, this had not changed. "France is, and always will remain, Britain's greatest danger," Lord Salisbury had said in 1867, and he clung to this view during his three terms as Prime Minister. France posed a multiple threat: to the British Isles directly across the Channel, and to the imperial lifeline as it passed through the Mediterranean. At a dozen spots around the globe, French and british colonies rubbed against each other uncomfortably. Britain's other traditional enemy was Russia. (pp. xxii-xxiii) SNIP ...Russian policies seemed threatening. Britain's Director of Military Intelligence warned in 1887, "The countries with which we are most likely to go to war are France and Russia and the worst combination which we have any reason to dread is an alliance of France and Russia." In 1894, precisely such an alliance was signed wand the dreaded became reality. (pg. xxiii) Having grasped the importance of sea power and seeking to advance Germany’s influence beyond Europe, WIlliam and his advisors confronted a dilemma: either Germany could accept British supremacy at sea and work within this framework, or it must challenge British supremacy and build a fleet powerful enough to wrest the trident away. (pp.xxiv)

Although Britain ruled the seas, it did not have a monopoly on naval build-up.
The German merchant navy, the second-largest in the world, used British harbours and depended on British naval protection around the globe. Germany naval officers had grown up on British-built ships, burning British coal, using British techniques and tactics. British and German officers looked on each other as brothers. One choice, then, was to build on this relationship, reinforce and solidify it, looking to the day when Germany and Britain might act, in Europe and the world, in partnership, perhaps even in alliance. The appointment of Admiral Tirpitz signalled that the opposite choice had been made. (pg. xxiv) SNIP At any moment, the British Navy could blockade the German coast, bottle the German Empire exist on British sufference? Why should German greatness come as a gift from Section 4 Page 47

another people? (pp.xxiv) SNIP

The British were threatened by a planned upgrade of the German Navy by Bertie, Prince of Wales’ main royal competitor, his nephew - the Kaiser .
A German Navy strong enough to protect German merchant shipping in these waters and guarantee unimpeded passage to the oceans meant, in the last resort, a German fleet able to defeat the British Navy. This Great Britain would never permit, for it meant also a German fleet strong enough to screen an invasion of England, to sweep from the seas all British merchant shipping, to strip Britain of her colonies and empire. Thus, the goal of the German Navy to protect German commerce on the high seas - was wholly incompatible with the interest of British security. What one power demanded, the other was unwilling to concede. (pp.xxiv) SNIP ...the German reply was that German warships posed little threat to Britain and that the German Empire had the same right as the British Empire to build whatever warships it chose. (pp.xxv) William might proclaim - as he did in Stettin in 1891 - that “our future is on the water,” (pp. 163)

Kaiser William II’s ambitions for Germany were grand and global and a threat to his British uncle, the Prince of Wales. As with all modern wars, but unknown to the masses, every confrontation allegorizes a personal crisis of the world leaders. The question at hand during the end of the Victorian Age and key issue to the Edwardian Age was the continuation of the Christian principles as guideposts for morals and behavior and for the monarchy and kingdom.. More specifically, adultery, pedophelia nd polygamy were the topics on the table. King William II’s positon represented a defence of traitional values for which Germany was willing to fight to the end. Edward’s position was to dissolve all restraints to personal pleasure.
William’s ambitions were global. He wanted a fleet to inspire worldwide respect, to defend German colonies, and to protect German merchant ships on the high seas; for this purpose a large fleet of cruisers equipped for foreign service seemed more useful than squadrons of battleships riding at anchor in Kiel and Wilhelmshaven. Hollmann's strategy was based on coastal defense and commerce raiding: he wanted cruisers. Senden believed in battleships. He accepted Mahan's thesis that without a battle fleet as the hard core of national sea power, even swarms of cruisers would eventually be gobbled up by enemy battleships. Knorr waffled, frustrated that administratively it was Hollmann who decided what ships should be built. In fact, the real opposition to Hollmann and cruisers, the true intellectual proponent of battleships and a mighty German battle fleet, was a navy captain serving in the High command. His name was Alfred Tirpitz.(pp. 164) On June 6, 1897 [German Navy Minister - Admiral] Tirpitz arrived in Berlin. (pp. 171)

The issue at hand was turpitude. Tipitz was brought in to defend against depravity because his name represented war with turpitude. Germany would fight to the end to defend Christian culture.
Section 4 Page 48

June 6 was code for the Anti-Christ, or an attempt to rule the world for Satan. Six is the number which symbolizes man. The elevation of man is opposite of serving God. God is the Word. Anti-Christ means being against the Word of God. Satanists knew the AntiChrist would be born on June 6. I was born June 6. Old man Bush was born June 12 which is like three sixes. Clinton’s mother was born June 6. (June 15 has the same numerical value as 6/6, to these people.) Violet Keppel, Mrs. Keppel’s young daughter was born on June 6. Edward VII believed he needed her energy to make this bold attempt at becoming the AntiChrist who would make the rules for the world (rule the world). He wanted to make polygamy, pedaphelia rape, and adultery legal. (Not unlike the purpose of gay agenda of today.)
SNIP On June 15...[Tirpitz] presented a 2,5000 word “Very Secret” memorandum entitled “General Considers on the Constitution of Our Fleet According to Ship Classes and Designs.” (pp. 172) SNIP

Edward VII’s view was a worldwide threat to Western civilization. Edward was backed by the Rothschilds who had their own agenda and motives for supporting Bertie’s degenderacy. (With the predestined leader of the family today, the Rothschild agenda has changed. God, too, can play bait and switch games. God as a Sovereign, does not owe an explanation to man for everything He does.) Edward VII’s private actions motivated Germany’s realization that it needed its own strength. The future war was planned at a higher level than Bertie. To start any war, an enemy must be created.
“For Germany, the most dangerous naval enemy at the present time is England.” “Our fleet must be constructed so that it can unfold its greatest military potential between Heliogoland and the Thames.” (pp. 172) “The military situation against England demands battleships in as great a number as possible.” “Only the main theatere of war will be decisive.” All previous German naval strategy was swept away. (pp. 172) --The German Empire, ruled by the Queen’s grandson, was assumed to be England’s friend. .(pp. 231)

The personal animosity between Queen Victoria's two descendants grew until it reached a crescendo, in the last years of Bertie's life, at which point, Bertie had to agree that the Kaiser was right, but Bertie was being blackmailed by Mrs. Keppel. It was too late to turn the ship of war around, and it was launched a few years after he died. Being related by blood should have led to peaceful coexistence from the start, but vainglory masked a dread of being brought to naught by the revelation of Bertie’s sexual preferences - married women and their little girls. Royal family ties did not lead to a sense of camaraderie or long standing peaceful coexistence. The Hanovers had outlived their usefulness to God and His agenda.
Section 4 Page 49

The two men had polar opposite values, which contributed to a lack of trust and fed the prospect of future military conflict.
SNIP The international implication of Tirpitz’ memorandum were even more far-reaching. To justify building battleships a new enemy - England, at that time friendly to Germany -had been designated. (pp. 172) William approved Tirpitz’ memorandum and the Navy Secretary moved quickly to draft a new bill. (pp. 173) ...the reality of Admiral Tirpitz’ determination to build his “Navy Against England” penetrated English awareness, the British government prepared to alter the foreign policy which had served England since Trafalgar. The building of the German Fleet ended the century of Splendid Isolation. (pp. 185)

England had two choices. Form an alliance with Germany which would be beneficial to both nations, or go to war - a world war. Germany could build the greatest Navy they were capable of building, and with an alliance, this would have only aided the United Kingdom. Small-minded hedonist, King Edward VII, was guided by personal revenge and dread of his predilection towards little girls’ ‘o’s being exposed.
The Prince disliked Germany. Bernhard von Bulow, the German diplomat who later became Chancellor, knew the Prince well and said that Bertie “could never rid himself of the impression that the word “German’ was identical with the narrow-minded, moral preaching, drilling, and brute force. If he found a man to be dull, clumsy and uncouth, he would say of him: ‘He is as tiresome and tedious as a German professor.’ If a lady seemed to him to lack all grace and elegance, he compared her with a German Frauchen.” Bertie’s view of Germany was reinforced by his wife, Princess Alexandra, who hated Germans for wrenching away Schleswig and Holststein from Denmark, and by his sister Vicy, the German Crown Princess and later Empress, who disliked almost everything in Berlin and Germany. Dreadnought: Britain, Germany, and the Coming of the Great War by Robert K. Massie. (pp. 18)

War was his solution because he dreaded what would happen to him and his legacy if the knowledge that the Kaiser had become public. Kaiser William II knew and disapproved of Edward VII's illicit liaisons with married women and his debauchery with Mrs. Keppel's daughter, Violet. Bertie did not confine himself with sex with Mrs. Keppel's daughter, but he was also boinking his granddaughter, Princess Royal Mary whose confidante and servant was Else, a German woman who had to be sent back to Germany during World War I. The Prince of Wales commissioned the building of the Dreadnought battleships in an attempt to fortify himself against the consequences of his actions which could bring him to naught. DREAD NAUGHT
naught also nought n. (nôt) Pronunciation Key

Section 4 Page 50

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful