Professional Documents
Culture Documents
778-4 R
1st Edition, 01.07.1989. Revised Draft 10-09- 2008, 27-11-2008, 14-01-2009, 15-022009, 18-04-2009
Reviewed by the Panel of Structural Experts 04-02-2009
Summary
This leaflet gives guidelines and recommendations covering procedures for the maintenance
and strengthening of railway bridges. Arrangements and methods for inspection are presented;
defects are described; methods for monitoring and assessment are given; and procedures for
maintenance, repair, strengthening and renewal are defined.
The purpose is to update the 1989 edition of UIC Code 778-4R and to implement results from a
European Integrated Research Project (2003-2007) on Sustainable Bridges Assessment for
Future Traffic Demands and Longer Lives (TIP3-CT-2003-001653) within the 6th Framework
Programme.
Table of Contents
Summary ..........................................................................................................................................2
Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................2
1 - Inspection of railway bridges and detection of defects...............................................................3
1.1 - General .................................................................................................................................3
1.2 - Arrangements for inspection................................................................................................6
1.2.1 - Detail and frequency .....................................................................................................6
1.2.2 - Routine inspections .......................................................................................................6
1.2.3 - Principal Inspections .....................................................................................................6
1.2.4 - General Inspections.......................................................................................................7
1.2.5 - Documents ....................................................................................................................8
2 - Defects in existing bridges..........................................................................................................9
2.1 Definitions...........................................................................................................................9
2.2 Detection and measurements of defects ..............................................................................9
2.2.1 - Overview of methods and equipment ...........................................................................9
2.2.2 Methods for metal bridges..........................................................................................11
2.2.3 Methods for Masonry Bridges....................................................................................13
2.2.4 Methods for Concrete Bridges ...................................................................................15
2.2.5 Methods for Bearings and Foundations .....................................................................17
2.3 - Classification of defects .....................................................................................................19
3 - Monitoring ................................................................................................................................20
3.1 Testing methods: ..................................................................................................................20
3.2 Data processing methods:.....................................................................................................20
3.3 Sensors: ................................................................................................................................20
4 - Methods for Load and Resistance Assessment .........................................................................21
5 - Maintenance, repair / strengthening and renovation.................................................................22
5.1 - Maintenance ......................................................................................................................22
5.2 - Repair ................................................................................................................................22
5.3 - Strengthening ....................................................................................................................23
5.4 - Renewals ...........................................................................................................................24
Bibliography...................................................................................................................................25
Appendix A Notation .................................................................................................................27
Recommendations for the inspection, assessment and maintenance of masonry arch bridges.
A standard for the terminology for maintenance is given in EN 13306 (2001).
Optional
Structural Health
Monitoring
(qualitative information)
BRIDGE
MANAGEMENT
(Administration)
Regular, minor
maintenance
(preventive, corrective)
Bridge
Management System
(more/less advanced)
Figure 1. Regular operation and maintenance of bridges. If there are questions regarding
safety, serviceability or durability, action can be taken according to Figures 2 and 3.
From SB-GUIDE (2007).
Special stage
Investigation and assessment
Special inspections
supported by more/less
advanced tests
(quantitative information)
Focused
monitoring through
limited time period
(quantitative information)
BRIDGE
ASSESSMENT
(Carried out in
phases)
Required
performance
confirmed?
Redefine use
Intensify
monitoring
Strengthening
and/or repair
Replacement
Figure 2. Special stage of operation and maintenance of bridges when there is a special concern
regarding . safety, serviceability or durability. After decisions are made and actions taken (the
last line in the figure), the bridge is returned to regular operation and maintenance according to
Figure 1. The assessment procedure is further illustrated in Figure 3 taken from SB-Guide 2007.
Doubts
PHASE 1 - INITIAL
Site visit
Study of documents
Simple calculation
Doubts confirmed?
Yes
PHASE 2- INTERMEDIATE
Material investigations
Detailed calculations/analysis
Further inspections and monitoring
PHASE 3 - ENHANCED
No
Compliance with
codes and
regulations?
Simple repair or
strengthening
solve the
problem?
No
Yes
No
Refined calculations/analysis
Laboratory examinations and
field testing
Statistical modelling
Reliability-based assessment
Economical decision analysis
Yes
Simple
strengthening
of bridge
Update
maintenance,
inspection and
monitoring strategy
Yes
Sufficient load
capacity? Acceptable
serviceability?
No
Unchanged
use of bridge
Strengthening
of bridge
Demolition
of bridge
Figure 3. Flow chart for the assessment of existing bridges as part of the process with the
special stage of operation and maintenance in Figure 2. Three phases are identified: Initial,
Intermediate and Enhanced, depending on the complexity of the questions involved. Taken from
SB-LRA (2007).
- installation of scaffolding;
- removal of certain elements to facilitate inspection of main structural components;
- for piers and foundations it may be necessary to use divers.
1.2.5 - Documents
Documents such as design drawings, geotechnical surveys, calculations, construction
documents and the results of the acceptance inspection of the structure provide basic inputs for
the inspections. The documents shall be available during the inspections in paper or digital form
(e.g in a lap-top computer)
The reports of subsequent inspections shall be based on the surveys of the actual condition of
the structure. They shall contain details of irregularities discovered or of the development of
defects revealed by earlier inspections.
Details shall also be given of the maintenance work necessary in the short and long term;
together with any operations carried out since the last inspection.
The following examples of available equipment are given in SB-ICA (2007), Table 5.2. In SBICA (2007) there is also a tool box for non destructive testing (NDT) methods with a one-page
summary of each method explaining its merits and drawbacks. The background to the tool-box is
described in Helmerich et al (2007, 2008a, b). Methods for masonry arch bridges are also given
in UIC Code 778-3R (2009).
Radiographic Methods
Radiography with isotopes/
steel (RI)
10
11
the most accurate information can be obtained on the nature and characteristics of the materials
used in the structure.
The problem, however, is:
1) that it is often difficult to remove a sufficient amount of steel from structural elements to
provide a representative sample;
2) to identify lowstressed structural components for sampling to prevent significant weakening of
the structure;
3) whether the sample taken is adequately representative of the structure as a whole (e.g. old
iron or steel bridges, in which materials of varying origin have been used on construction or
repair).
In Table 2.2 NDT methods are given. A combination of methods is often useful.
Table 2.2. Non Destructive Testing (NDT) Methods for Metal Bridges
The following table gives information about restrictions and limitation of NDT-methods, SB-ICA
(2007), Table 5.4.
NDT-Method
Investigated details
Limitation in use.
Accuracy of the method including
characteristics of the material
Remarks
Visual
Contamination, loss of
material, deterioration,
displacements, cracks
Listening for audible
sounds from tapping the
surface with a hammer
Propagating cracks
2D/ 3 D-Localisation of
active cracks
Defects in thin layers
Depends on span
Provides an approximate
understanding of the condition
Research level
Hammer
tapping
Acoustic
Emission (AT)
Eddy current
test
Magnetic
particle test
Surface cracks
Colour
penetration
test (PT)
Radiography
(RT)
Surface cracks,
Ultrasonic
echo (UT)
Weldroot testing,
residual plate thickness,
thickness of surface
coating
Internal voids in
sandwiched elements
12
Last phase (3 ) in
reassessment
Ultrasonic
array (UTarray)
rd
Last phase (3 ) in
reassessment
The EU (JRC) has published recommendations for the Assessment of existing steel structures
together with the ECCS [EUR23252EN].
Table 2.3. Non Destructive Testing (NDT) Methods for Masonry Bridges
The following table gives information about restrictions and limitation of NDT-methods, SB-ICA
(2007), Table 5.4. Information is also given in UIC Code 778-3R (2009) Tables 3.1- 3.6
13
NDT-Method
Investigated details
Limitation in use.
Accuracy of the method including
characteristics of the material
Remarks
Visual
Qualitative values:
geometry cracks (length,
depth), heavy
displacements,
longitudinal/ diagonal
cracks in the barrel,
vegetation, drainage,
humidity, heavy
settlement
Listening for audible
sounds from hammertapping the surface
Provides an approximate
understanding of the condition
Radar-echo
500 MHz,
900 MHz,
(Ground
penetrating
radar, Georadar, Impulse
radar)
Radar echo
200-500Hz
< 5 m depth
in heterogeneous material: ~ 10 % of
the depth,
Ultrasonic
echo (US)
(US-array
without
coupling
agent):
transversal: 50
kHz
longitudinal:
100 kHz
Acoustic
emission
Local inhomogeneity,
Thickness,
Metal inclusions
EU-funded project
Saferail has developed
new wagon with 4
antennas
Access from one side:
Depending on the task to
solve: Frequency 50-300
kHz.
Assessment phase 3
Localisation of active
cracks
SIP-spectral
induced
polarisation
Humidity, inhomogeneity
visualised in 2Dconductivity images
Flat-jack test
Single or
double*
Determination of stress
under service in the
masonry
Hole-drilling
method*
Stress-strain behaviour
in one single point
Hammer
tapping
Method feasible,
No final standards, since
research is ongoing
Applicable to backfill,
masonry
14
Table 2.4. Non Destructive Testing (NDT) Methods for Concrete Bridges
The following table gives information about restrictions and limitation of NDT-methods, SB-ICA
(2007), Table 5.4.
15
NDT-Method
Investigated details
Limitation in use.
Accuracy of the method
includingcharacteristics of the
material
Remarks
Visual
Contamination, loss,
deterioration,
displacements, cracks
Hammer tapping
Provides an approximate
understanding of the condition
Radar-echo
500 MHz,
900 MHz, 1.5
GHz
(Groundpenetrating
radar, Georadar, impulse
radar)
Radar
transmission 500
MHz, 900 MHz,
1.5 GHz
Ultrasonic echo
(US)
(US-array
without coupling
agent):
transversal: 50
kHz
longitudinal: 100
kHz
Acoustic
emission
Girder-web thickness,
Slab thickness,
Embankment/ Retaining
wall reinforcement, Tendon
ducts, Inhomogeneity,
Humidity,
Metal inclusions (anchors)
Research level,
Access from both sides
Depth: 5-40 cm
Defect size: 10-30 mm
Train traffic noise, building activities
such as drilling, anchor dysfunction
or other noise can influence the
acoustic signal acquisition,
Localisation of active
cracks
Method feasible,
No final standards, since
research is ongoing
Ultrasonic air
coupling
Voids
Impact-echo
Thickness, delamination
between two concrete
layers, location of voids,
quantification of cracks
Near subsurface voids,
delamination, moisture,
plaster delamination,
control of strengthening
measures
Metal inclusions, cables,
wires, tubes
Active thermography
Radiography
(cobalt, -ray)
16
Research level
No moving / scanning
technique
2 - Material defects:
- chemical; mechanical and metallurgical testing of samples.
- cracking of mechanical or elastomeric parts
- corrosion
3 - Defects in bearing fasteners:
- detection of loose baseplates or of bedding-mortar break-up.
B Defects in foundations
1 - Methods applicable to all types of foundations:
- visual examination on site, where necessary after excavation of inspection pits;
- measurements of tilting with the aid of plumb lines, and twist measurements using deflection
meters (inclinometers);
- measurements of twist at the bearings;
- ground investigation with the aid of soil samples (penetrometer, pressure gauge);
- examination of borings:
17
water pressure tests, visual examination (endoscope, TV camera), recording of the various
parameters with the aid of probes.
2 - Specific methods applicable to underwater foundations :
- visual examination and probing by divers or frogmen;
- depth soundings (underwater topography) and recording of the bottom bed profile, adjacent to
the foundations, repeated at regular intervals to determine bed profile patterns;
- underwater cameras and video recordings ;
- use of dyes to follow the route of water courses and locate places where the water reappears.
Examples of methods for foundations and transition zones are given in SB-ICA(2007), chapter 9.
C Waterproofing defects
- Visual examination:
Investigated
details
Limitation in use.
Accuracy of the method
including. characteristics of
the material
Remarks
Radar echo
Radar echo
array
200-800
MHz
Soil layers,
thickness, scour,
humidity
track-bed condition
SIP
Spectral
Sonic-velocity
evaluation along a
profile on masonry
surface
Integrity of pile
foundations, pile
length
Pile length
Borehole
tomography
Parallel
seizmic
method
18
19
3 - Monitoring
Monitoring is mostly used in special cases, for example.
- In the construction phase to check strains and deformations
- Before and after strengthening of a bridge to check the effect of the strengthening
- On important and new types of bridges to check their behaviour and to calibrate numerical and
analytical models for bridges for their load bearing capacity and life-cycle length
- On damaged bridges to check the bearing capacity
- To check the influence of increased speed and/orheavier loads on an existing bridge
- To check if maintenance procedures are efficient
Examples of methods are given in SB-MON (2007), chapter 7 Monitoring tool-box.
3.3 Sensors:
-Accelerations (Piezoelectric accelerometers, Capacitive accelerometer, Force balanced
accelerometer),
- Displacements (Inductive linear position sensors, Vibrating wire displacement sensors,
Microbend displacement sensor, Pulse time-of-flight deformation sensor, Capacity non-contact
displacement sensor, Eddy-current displacement sensor),
- Strains (Electrical resistance strain gage, Bragg grating strain gage, Fabry-Perot interferometer
strain gage, Interferometric deformation sensors),
- Temperatures (Thermocouples, Bragg grating temperature sensor, Resistance thermometers)
20
For masonry arch bridges, guidelines are also given in UIC Code 778-3R (2009)
21
5.2 - Repair
Repair covers all measures aimed at restoring the structure to working condition. Such
measures are directed at the cause of defects and are thus designed to prevent their further
development. For this work to be carried out efficiently, a thorough examination of the structure
is required. Although experience from earlier cases and the review of previous data are of great
value, it should not be forgotten that every structure needing repair is a unique case
Repair work may include for example
- on masonry bridges: rejointing, injection and application of surface coating in case of extensive
22
superficial damage
- on metal bridges: the replacement of damaged metal components, arresting the further growth
of cracks by stop hole drilling to reduce the stress concentration at the crack tip and than
bridging of cracks by cover plates using rivets or high-strength friction-grip bolts;
- on concrete bridges: the renovation of the concrete surface by application of shotcrete or
injected mortar, or cast-insitu concrete;
- re-waterproofing and installing new drains
- repair of expansion joints;
- treatment of cracks in concrete or masonry by injection, sealing, bridging, installation of
anchors/bolts, wedges and cramps;
- installation of tie bars or prestressed tie rods;
- replacement or repair of materials underperforming technically;
- replacement of the whole bearing or of bearing components,
beneath the bearing plates, repair of bearing supports;
5.3 - Strengthening
Work of this kind is undertaken in particular to ensure the safety and regularity of rail traffic in
response to railways' current demand for:
- heavier axle loads for freight traffic ;
- higher maximum speeds for both freight and/or passenger traffic, on existing lines.
In order to achieve the first objective, it is frequently necessary to increase the carrying capacity
of the structure; the second objective, depending on the new speed planned, may occasionally
necessitate bridge-widening.
Older concrete bridges may be strengthened by means of additional reinforcement, for example
by using the technique of bonded plates, sheets or bars of steel or Carbon Fibre Reinforced
Polymers (CFRP), see SB-STR (2007).
If necessary, it is possible:
- to strengthen masonry arches by means of a saddle or adding a new ring, and also by tyingin
23
the spandrel walls. The height of the haunches may also be increased by injection.
- to strengthen prestressed concrete superstructures by additional prestressing.
- to reinforce steel decks by replacement of weak components, bracing components with
inadequate resistance to flexural buckling, fining additional components.
- to reinforce walls and abutments by ground anchoring at the rear, soil injection, or load transfer
to root piles.
- to protect and improve underwater foundations by means of concrete or sheetpile enclosures,
and to protect and stabilise the ground in the vicinity of water courses by stone pitching, gabions
or drainage blankets.
Methods for strengthening are given in SB-STR (2007). This Guide contains a graphic index
with typical structures plus examples of areas in need of strengthening and of possible methods.
Methods for masonry arch bridges are also given in chapter 5 of UIC Code 778-3R (2009)
5.4 - Renewals
Renewals cover the replacement of a complete structure or of decks if necessary where
because of the poor condition of the structure, strengthening cannot provide an economical
solution ensuring traffic safety under the required operating conditions.
On main lines, the replacement of steel decks with small spans up to, say, 15 m is generally
more economical than strengthening, especially if there are restrictions imposed on maintaining
rail traffic movements.
24
Bibliography
EN 1337 (2000) Structural bearings. General design rules. EN1337-1:2000
EN 13306 (2001): Maintenance terminology. European standard, CEN, 54pp.
Helmerich, R., Bien, J., Cruz, P.J.S. (2007):A guideline for railway bridge inspection and
condition assessment including the NDT toolbox Proceedings: Sustainable Bridges Assessment for Future Traffic Demands and Longer Lives,,pp 93-104; Wroclaw : Dolnoslaskie
Wydawnictwo Edukacyjne. ISBN 978-83-7125-161-0
Helmerich, R., Niederleithinger, E., Trela, Ch., Bien, J., Bernardini, G. (2008a):
Complex multi-tool inspection of a masonry arch bridge using non-destructive testing
Proceedings: Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Health Monitoring and Informatics IABMAS 2008, July 13-17, 2008, Seoul, South Korea, 8 pp; CRC Press; Editor: International
Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety IABMAS. ISBN 978--0-415-46844-2
Helmerich, R., Niederleithinger, E., Algernon, D., Streicher, D., Wiggenhauser, H (2008b):
Bridge Inspection and Condition Assessment in Europe. Scientific journal: Transportation
Research Records, Taylor & Francis, Washington D.C., USA.
SB-GUIDE (2007): Overall Project Guide: Sustainable Bridges Assessment for Future Traffic
Demands and Longer Lives a project within EU FP7. 28pp. Available from: www.uic.asso.fr or
www.sustainablebridges.net. [cited 30 XX 2008]
SB-ICA (2007): Guideline for Inspection and Condition Analysis of Railway Bridges. Prepared by
Sustainable Bridges a project within EU FP6. 259 pp. Available from: www.uic.asso.fr or
www.sustainablebridges.net. [cited 30 XX 2008]
SB-LRA (2007): Guideline for Load and Resistance Assessment of Railway Bridges.
Prepared by Sustainable Bridges a project within EU FP6, 428 pp. Available from:
www.uic.asso.fr or www.sustainablebridges.net. [cited 30 XX 2008]
SB-MON (2007): Guideline for Monitoring of Railway Bridges. Prepared by Sustainable Bridges
a project within EU FP6. 93 pp.. Background documents for: Steel railway bridges, SB-5.2-S1,
53 pp; Structural Damping of Railway Bridges, SB-5.2-S2, 29 pp; Corrosion Monitoring Systems
for Reinforced Concrete Bridges, SB-5.2-S3, 23 pp; Estimating Reliability of Monitoring systems
for Bridges, SB-5.2-S4, 20 pp. Available from: www.uic.asso.fr or www.sustainablebridges.net.
[cited 30 XX 2008].
SB-STR (2007): Guide for use of Repair and Strengthening methods for Railway Bridges.
Prepared by Sustainable Bridges a project within EU FP6. 63 pp. Available from:
www.uic.asso.fr or www.sustainablebridges.net. [cited 30 XX 2008].
UIC Code 778-1R (1997): Recommendations for the consideration of fatigue in the design of
steel railway bridges. UIC, 2nd edition, 1.1.1997
UIC Code 778-2R (1997): Recommendations for determining the carrying capacity of existing
metal structures. UIC, 1st edition of 1.7.86 and 1 Amendment
25
UIC Code 778-3R (2009): Recommendations for the inspection, assessment and maintenance
of masonry arch bridges. Approved by the Panel of Structural Experts in February 2008, 163 pp.
Update of an earlier version from 1.7.1995. The following reports were produced:
- Bien, J, Kaminski, T, Rawa, P. (2006): Technology and pilot version of expert tool supporting
the evaluation of the degradation level for masonry bridges with damages. UIC Report
- Brencich, A., Gambarotta, L. (2006): Guide to the high-level assessment of masonry arch
bridges. UIC Report
- Gilbert, M. (2006): Guide to use of RING 2.0 for the assessment of railway masonry arches.
UIC Report
- Harvey, W. J. (2007): Review of the MEXE method. UIC Report
- Harvey W J. (2007b): Rule of thumb method for the assessment of arches. UIC Report (draft)
- Harvey W J. (2007c): Guide to the assessment of masonry arch bridges. UIC Report
- Ingenieurbro A. Pauser. (2005): Guide to the assessment of circular masonry arch bridges.
UIC Report
- Ingenieurbro A. Pauser. (2005): Guide to the destructive testing of masonry bridges. UIC
Report
- Ozaeta, R. G, Martn-Caro, J.A. (2006): Catalogue of Damages for Masonry Arch Bridges. UIC
Report
- Ozaeta, R. G, Martn-Caro, J.A., Brencich, A. (2007): Guide to the execution and control of
masonry arch repairs. UIC Report
- Steffens, K., Gutermann, M. (2006): Guide to the load test of masonry arch bridges. UIC
Report
- Orban, Z. (ed.) (2006): Recommendations for the non-destructive testing of masonry arch
bridges. UIC Report
- UIC Code 778-3R. (1994): Recommendations for the assessment of the loadcarrying capacity
of existing masonry and mass-concrete arch bridges, Paris.
- UIC Report. (2004): Assessment, Reliability and Maintenance of Masonry Arch Bridges (ed.
Orban, Z., UIC Masonry Arch Bridges Study Group). State-of-the-Art Research Report of the
International Union of Railways, Paris.
UIC Masonry (2008): Improving Assessment, Optimisation of Maintenance and Development of
Database for Masonry Arch Bridges. A research project of the International Union of Railways,
see http://masonry.uic.asso.fr
ECCS-JRC Joint report: Recommendations for the assessment of existing steel structures
(2008), EUR 23252 EN. http://eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu/doc/background/EUR23252EN.pdf
VHFL (2009): Guidelines for Bearings (In German). Vereinigung der Hersteller von
Fahrbahnbergngen und (Brcken)Lagern (Association of Bearing Producer). See www.vhfl.de
26
Appendix A Notation
Definitions and short characteristic of the terms for inspection and
Condition-assessment of railway bridges including Non Destructive
Testing (NDT) methods in bridge engineering
The following table lists terms and procedures for inspections and condition assessment
(ICA) of railway bridge structures. They may give a rough overview about the
terminology and understanding of non-destructive evaluation of the current state of an
investigated bridge. Amended from SB-ICA (2007).
Table A1. Terms and procedures for inspection and condition assessment
English Terms
Acoustic
emission (AT)
Acoustic
methods
Array
Artefacts
A-scan
Assessment
B-scan
Definition
Acoustic Emission is the class of phenomena whereby an elastic
wave, in the range of ultrasound usually between 20 KHz and 1
MHz, is generated by the rapid release of energy from the source
within a material. The elastic wave propagates through the solid to
the surface, where it can be recorded by one or more sensors.
Acoustic methods are non-destructive testing methods for the
investigation of the current condition of the inner structure by
implementing an acoustic sound as impact (single wave) by an
hammer impact or an acoustic wave, induced by acoustic sensors
(ultrasound) recording and processing the reflected or transmitted
waves. Each material needs sensors developed for
characteristic frequencies. Acoustic methods can be applied in echo
mode (transmitter and receiver are on the same side of en structural
element, recording reflected waves) or in transmission mode (transmitter
and receiver are on opposite sides of an element).
Array is a set of sensors. Usually, sensors can be applied as a group
of sensors, transmitters or receivers. Known procedures are US-array
measurement, phased array for investigation of cracks in steel
or concrete structures. The set-up of a group of acoustic emission
sensors is also named array. Ultrasonic phased arrays are well
introduced to quality assurance systems of industrial steel
structures. They are investigated for use in concrete bridges.
Non real phenomena in images calculated as inverse processing of
NDT-data sets, artefacts actually result from an inauspicious algorithm or
geometry, data density or quality. Experience is required to
distinguish real defects from artefacts.
Acoustic, thermal or electromagnetic data obtained with non-destructive
testing methods recorded in time domain for one single point on the surface
of a structure.
A set of activities undertaken to characterise current state and the
reliability of a structure in comparison with a required state. See
condition assessment and structural assessment.
Image of a vertical section perpendicular to the investigated surface
below a line scan recorded in time domain
27
Bridge condition
assessment
Bridge defect:
Bridge safety/
structural
assessment
Bridge
serviceability
Bridge technical
condition
CFRP
C-scan
Condition
Condition
assessment
Condition
rating
Condition
ranking
Corrosion
detection
Damage
28
Data Fusion
Data
reconstruction
Degradation
Duty survey
Eddy- current
test (EDT)
Endoscope
Electrochemical
inspections
Electromagnetic
methods (EM)
Experts opinion
(E)
General
Inspection
Impact echo
Impulse radar
29
Inspection
Magnetic Particle
Test (MT)
, Non-Destructive
Testing(NDT)
Permeability
Phased array
Polarisation
Potential field
Principal
Inspection
Probability of
Detection(POD)
Radiographic
methods
30
Routine
Inspection
Resistance
Assessment
SAFT
Special
investigation
Strength
Assessment:
Survey
Thermography
Time of flight
areas
(TOF)
Tomography
Ultrasonic
31
Ultrasonic-echo
(US-echo)
Visual
inspection
Application
With effect from 1 May 2009
All UIC railways.
32