Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1998
0 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved
Printed in Great Britain
0016.2361/98 $19.00+0.00
PII: SOO16-2361(98)00017-9
ELSEVIER
Combustion characteristics of
lignite-water
slurries
Reha Yavuzac*, Sadriye KQ@kbayraka and Alan Williamsb
alstanbul Technical University, Chemical Engineering Department, 80626 Maslak-Istanbul,
Turkey
bLeeds University, Fuel and Energy Department, Leeds LS2 9JT, U.K.
(Received 21 February 1997; revised 12 January 1998)
Coal water slurries have been developed over the last 15 years as an alternative to fuel oil mainly in industry and
power station boilers. They are also a considerable potential for gasification applications, blast furnace injection
and fluidized bed combustors. Determination and improvement of combustion characteristics of coal-water
slurries are as important as the preparation of the suitable slurry. Suspended single droplet combustion technique
may be the best of the methods used in the investigation of combustion characteristics of liquid fuel droplets. The
main advantage of this technique is that, droplet lifetime history, ignition delay, flame structure, centre and surface
temperature of the droplet and burning rate can be investigated and a good comparative result for different fuels
under the same conditions can be obtained. Therefore, suspended single droplet combustion technique was used in
this study. The effect of droplet size, lignite fraction in the slurry and furnace temperature on slurry combustion
were studied systematically. 0 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved
(Keywords: combustion; lignite; water; slurry)
INTRODUCTION
Coal water slurries have been developed over the last 15
years as an alternative to fuel oil mainly in industry and
power station boilers. They are also a considerable potential
for gasification applications,
blast furnace injection and
fluidized bed combustors. The attraction of the coal water
slurry (CWS) is its complete independence of an oil supply.
There are two major reasons for investigating the suitability
of CWSs as a fuel. Firstly, the fuel can be stored without the
danger of a coal dust explosion and burned in a similar way
to heavy fuel oil in existing oil-fired equipments with a few
modifications,
and secondly CWSs can be transported in
pipelines,
leading to reduction
in transportation
costs
compared to the coal. There are also some disadvantages
to be overcome, such as increase of wear and blockage of
mechanical components, flame instability and changes in
heat transfer in the combustion chamber, and stability and
flow problems during storage and pumping.
In CWS technology, one important thing is to prepare a
suitable slurry, which means it has a high coal loading, a low
viscosity,
and a good stability against settling. Most
important, however, is to determine combustion characteristics of the prepared slurry and to improve it. In this
connection, various studies have already been published2-4.
In the investigation of the combustion behavior of CWSs, a
suspended single droplet technique has been widely used5.
The main advantage of this technique is that, droplet
lifetime history, ignition delay, flame structure, centre and
surface temperature of the droplet and burning rate can be
investigated and a good comparative result for different
fuels under the same conditions can be obtained. However,
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
EXPERIMENTAL
Preparation
of lignite-water
slurries
77 Number
11
1229
Table 1
Proximate
analysis
and calorific
Sample
Tekirda&Karakaya
(TK)
values
of the lignite
samples
Moisture
(%)
Volatile matter
(%)
Fixed carbon
(%)
Ash
(%)
15.12
34.42
39.32
11.14
20.08
Bolu-Merkesler
(BM)
11.58
41.26
36.65
10.51
24.20
Yozgat-Sorgun
(YS)
8.66
35.78
49.49
6.07
28.14
Bursa-Orhaneli
(BO)
30.38
34.50
31.19
3.93
18.93
Bolu-Mengen
(BMN)
7.67
48.93
37.24
6.16
26.74
Table 2
The composition
Sample
of the lignite-water
Lignite
(%)
Water
(%)
slurries
Moisture
(So)
Volatile matter
Fixed carbon
(%)
(%)
Ash
(%)
Density
(g cm- )
TKl
71.50
28.50
39.31
24.61
28.11
7.96
1.344
TK2
65.80
34.20
44.13
22.66
25.88
7.33
1.309
TK3
61.50
38.50
47.80
21.17
24.18
6.85
1.290
BMl
71.60
28.40
36.69
29.54
26.24
7.53
1.305
BM2
67.90
32.10
39.96
28.02
24.89
7.14
1.284
BM3
61.50
38.50
45.62
25.37
22.54
6.47
1.237
YSl
69.80
30.20
36.24
24.97
34.54
4.24
1.231
YS2
66.50
33.50
39.26
23.79
32.91
4.04
1.219
YS3
61.50
38.50
43.83
22.00
30.43
3.73
1.200
(1)
the major axis being coaxial with
d2 is the length of the minor axis
axis. The equivalent diameters of
the range of 900-1800 pm.
AND DISCUSSION
1230
77 Number
11
l4-7.
10
20
30
40
50
60
I
70
Time [s]
slurry
61
I
45
I
40
35
30
I
50
*jtlat
36
40
44
48
25
1.0
0.8
1.2
20
i
1.4
31
I
36
I
40
I
44
stages of a
BMN
Calculated
I
48
77 Number 11
1231
16 -
8
30
14 -
I
35
I
40
I
45
I
50
12
15
TK
YS
BM
61
20
I
24
I
28
Calculated
I
32
I
36
ship between the ignition delay time and the volatile matter
content of the LWS droplet. The greater the increase in the
volatile matter content of the slurry the lower the ignition
delay time of the droplet. Thus, using lignites of higher
volatile matter content in the preparation of the slurry can be
1232
77 Number
I
25
I
30
I
35
1
40
0
0
0
I
20
11
(2)
where a, b, and c are the experimental coefficients depending on the nature of the lignite sample, tame is the visible
flame lifetime and tf is the furnace temperature. a, b, and c
values are given in Table 3.
Comparing Tekirdag-Karakaya
(TK) and Bolu-MerkeSler
(BM) lignite samples in the visible flame lifetime, it can be
clearly seen that TKs flame lifetime is shorter. Visible
flame lifetime is directly related to the concentration of the
volatile matters in the surrounding gas layer. The difference
in the flame lifetimes between these two lignite samples
(3)
where x, y, and z are the experimental coefficients depending on the furnace temperature and the size of droplet, tchwis
2.5 r
2.0 T
.g
1.5 -
E
._
E
2
LL
1.0 -
0.5 -
01
1000
1040
1080
1120
1160
1200
Furnace
temperature
of the visible
[K]
flame lifetime
with the
50
r
v;/
TK
YS
BM
BMN
BO
Calculated
*
16
20
24
28
32
36
Fixed carbon
content
[%]
K,=
(g cm
6.t,.n.d;S
-2s-1
>
(4)
Temperature
(K)
range
Coefficient of
determination r*
TK
-3950.99
4024.13
- 1024.33
1013-1133
0.9604
BM
-1072.17
1073.54
-268.14
1033-1183
0.9216
77 Number
11
1233
Combustion of lignite-water
Table 4
Coefficient of
determination rz
1073
48.65
678780
3.40
0.9936
1113
64.29
1.50
0.9990
Temperature
(K)
4041.10
60 r
20 -
p-;.*---
..*-
?
,..
.i
15 -
0
0
0
a
*
TK
YS
BM
BMN
BO
Calculated
10 I
16
i
,/:
..
,.f.
v------o
-..m.-+--+
-..D-..o.-
._..__._.._..a
?-
?
20
24
28
32
36
1000
,.
.i
+*
.I..
10 -
/_..---- .m / /
1050
1100
1150
BMl
TKl
TK3
BM3
ys3
1200
1250
Figure 11
temperature
[K]
and the
20
ON..
3
15
E
Y
,M
-_A ._.._0..
Q.-.._
..\
0
G
k!
20
24
28
32
36
10
5
36
-+-
TK
-Ct-
BM
.A_..
..\_
_..
_A.
.\
..\
Q,..
k.
I.
..,
A.,
k.,
k.
X0
40
Total water content
44
I..
0
48
[%]
Figure 12
1234
77 Number
11
Combustion
T;:
N
SC
TK3
BMl
... . .. . BM2
BM3
-I-
TKl
...O_.. TK2
-17+-
of lignite-water
CONCLUSIONS
01
1000
1040
1080
1120
1160
1200
Figure 15
-+
--[I
I
22
I
24
Volatile
I
26
matter content
TK
BM
28
30
[%]
Relation between the gas-phase burning rate coefficient of LWS droplets and the volatile matter content of the slurry
Figure 16
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish to thank British Council and The Scientific and
Technical Research Council of Turkey for their financial
support on this work (RY).
REFERENCES
Murdoch, P. and Williams, A., Sci. Prog., 0.x$, 1986, 70,
305.
Murdoch, P., Pourkashanian, M. and Williams, A., in The
Mechanism of Combustion of Coal-Water Slurries, 20th
Symp. (Int.) on Combustion, 1984, p. 1409.
Yao, S. C. and Liu, L., Combust. Flame, 1983, 51, 335.
Saito, M., Sadaka, M. and Sal&, T., Fuel, 1983,62, 1481-
1486.
Pourkashanian, M., Ph.D. thesis, The University of Leeds,
Fuel and Energy Department, January 1987.
Marcano, N., Pourkashanian, M. and Williams, A., Fuel,
1991, 70, 917.
Kobayashi, S., in 6th Symp. (Int.) on Combustion, Ins. of
Combustion, 1955, p. 141.
Sakai, T. and Sugiyama, S., J. Inst. Fuel, 1970, 43, 295
77 Number
11
1235