Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Article information:
To cite this document:
M. Sadiq Sohail Teo Boon Hoong, (2003),"TQM practices and organizational performances of SMEs in
Malaysia", Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 10 Iss 1 pp. 37 - 53
Permanent link to this document:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14635770310457539
Downloaded on: 30 April 2015, At: 01:47 (PT)
References: this document contains references to 24 other documents.
To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight.com
The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 3258 times since 2006*
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by 395718 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for
Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines
are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/1463-5771.htm
SMEs in
Malaysia
37
M. Sadiq Sohail
College of Industrial Management and Marketing, King Fahd University
of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, and
Introduction
The issues relating to implementation of total quality management (TQM) has
been a subject of interest to quality practitioners and researchers for well over
two decades. Improvement in internal efficiencies is imperative to become
competitive in the market place and the practice of quality management
techniques enables companies to improve internal efficiencies (Gunasekaran
et al., 1994) and competitiveness (Reed et al., 1996). Studies have shown that
loss of market share to the Japanese and other emerging competitors have
fueled the interest on TQM among the American and European firms (e.g. Poh
and Abd Hamid, 2001). A number of studies aimed at establishing links
between TQM practices and organizational performances have been reported
since Garvins (1988) observation that indicates that more research is vital to
M. Sadiq Sohail was formerly at Monash University, Malaysia.
Benchmarking: An International
Journal
Vol. 10 No. 1, 2003
pp. 37-53
q MCB UP Limited
1463-5771
DOI 10.1108/14635770310457539
BIJ
10,1
38
link quality practices with performances. However, most of these have focussed
on the developed nations.
Mandal et al. (2000) observe that in developing countries where the
economies are primarily regulated by government policies and the scope of
competition is limited, the position has been distinctly different from that of the
western economies. The difference lies in the fact that developing economies
had not given the same emphasis on quality practices, as the developed
nations. However, with market globalization and the growing interdependence
of economies, many developing countries have embraced quality management
concepts in order to improve their productivity and competitiveness in
international markets (Adam et al.,1996).
While there are commitments to TQM practices, opinion has been divided on
its implementation with some researchers supporting the idea of starting with
ISO 9000 certification as a first step towards TQM (e.g. Bradley, 1994) and
others preferring to focus only on TQM (e.g. Binney, 1992). As a result of this,
there are organizations that practice TQM, but which may or may not have
obtained ISO 9000 certification. However, ISO 9000 has assumed a credible
position as an international quality assurance model amongst a wide spectrum
of choice (Rahman, 2000).
Within the context of TQM itself, some researchers raise the issue of
benchmarking the appropriate quality measurements for different
organizations. Spencer and Loomba (2001), for example, raised the issue of
benchmarking the appropriate TQM practices for small- to medium-sized
enterprises (SMEs) while others such as Youssef and Zairi (1995) took a
broader approach to benchmark the appropriate TQM practices from empirical
results of different regions of the world. The issues raised are based on the
belief that quality practices differ depending on the industry and the scale on
which organizations operate.
In the light of this, this study aims to contribute to the TQM literature by
assessing on the TQM practices and organizational performances of SMEs
with and without ISO 9000 certification in the developing economy of Malaysia.
The focus is to examine whether research models developed for industrialized
countries are applicable in the Asian region. In addition, this study also
develops a framework of quality measurements based on prescriptive,
conceptual, practitioner, and empirical literatures to generically benchmark the
quality measurements of TQM for the use SMEs in Malaysia. A review of
literature is presented in the next section. This is followed by a description of
the research methodology. Major findings are presented and the implications
discussed. The paper concludes by highlighting the research limitations.
Literature review
A wealth of literature exists on quality issues and organizational performances.
Most of these suggest that initiation of quality leads to improved
SMEs in
Malaysia
39
BIJ
10,1
A review of literature has not identified any studies that have undertaken a
comprehensive and comparative analysis of TQM practice and organizational
performance of SMEs with and without ISO 9000 certification in the Malaysian
context. With this reasoning, there is a need for further research to establish a
setting of reference to analyze the quality practices by Malaysian SMEs.
40
SMEs in Malaysia
Since 1990s, Malaysia has been transforming from a commodity-based
producing nation to being a manufacturer of industrial products that is geared
towards exports. The SMEs continue to play a critical role in the countrys
industrialization program through the strengthening of both forward and
backward industrial linkages. The SMEs assume these roles by complementing
the activities of the large-scale industries through integration into the
mainstream industrial development. SMEs are involved in the process of
providing critical parts and components as well as expanding their market
internationally. It is envisaged that with the growth of SMEs, industrial base
will be strengthened further leading to enhance an export-led growth.
At the turn of the new millennium, the SMEs had accounted for more than 80
percent of the total manufacturing establishments in Malaysia. Within this
total, 88 percent were small-scale enterprises and the remaining 12 percent
belonged to the medium scale enterprises. It is observed that the SMEs in
Malaysia have continued to undergo intensive product specification, design
and engineering activities, improvement in marketing and distribution to
further enhance their prosperity especially in preparing them for the global
market. Efforts are being taken by them to improve technology accumulation
and enhancing the quality of labor force through education, experience and
skill development, optimizing the benefits and incentives made available by the
government of Malaysia.
With the trend towards global market orientation and trade liberalization,
SMEs are moving towards implementing quality systems. Larger
organizations competing in an increasingly global market are reliant on
SMEs to provide sub-contracting facilities, where there are observable
tendencies of heavy reliance on subcontracting and a trend of focusing on core
activities. Consequently, large organizations are widely dependent on a
network of suppliers, most of which will be SMEs.
It is, therefore, imperative for SMEs to meet quality standards, as large
organizations need assurance of high quality goods and services from SMEs.
The SMEs are expected to complement the activities of the large scale
industries through provision of essential inputs and components that will form
the critical linkage between industries, thus building and enhancing the
backbone of Malaysias long term industrial development program.
With favorable environmental factors, the SMEs in Malaysia are expected to
transcend from their present state to undertake a more important role in order
SMEs in
Malaysia
41
The model includes the various criteria of quality management where within
each criteria focus, a set of performance measurement variables have been
developed to measure the extent of which the quality management dimensions
has been practiced.
The main hypothesis postulated for this study is as follows:
H1. ISO 9000 certification enhances performance in quality management
practices.
Figure 1.
Research model
developed for this study
BIJ
10,1
42
The sub-hypothesis is developed based on the rationale that firms that operate
for a longer period will effectively exploit its learning curve, thereby
performing better in quality management practices relative to newer firms.
Research methodology
Survey instrument
To provide empirical evidence on the differences in TQM implementation and
organizational performances of SMEs with and without ISO 9000 certification,
in Malaysia, a mail survey was conducted. The survey instrument consisted of
the critical criteria construct presented in Figure 1 which were largely based on
the following literatures.
Rahman (2000) in conceptualizing a framework of TQM approach used the
criteria specified in the Australian Bureau of Excellence, which is structured
around leadership, strategy and planning, information and analysis, people,
customer focus, processes, products and services and organizational
performances.
Motwanis (2001) use of prescriptive, conceptual, practitioner, and empirical
research identifies critical constructs of TQM. The performance measures
identified include top management commitment, quality measurement and
benchmarking, process management, product design, employee training and
empowerment, vendor quality management, and customer involvement and
satisfaction. Thiagaragan and Zairi (2001) provide a TQM implementation
framework specifically for the Malaysian context. The same study identifies
the quality factors that are critical for TQM to flourish in the Malaysian
organizations.
Adopting these guidelines, a four-page survey instrument was developed,
which was structured into three parts. Part I established the ISO 9000
certification status of the respondent organizations. Part II measured the extent
of various management practices of the respondents. The extent of each of
these management practices holistically served as the conceptualization of
good or poor TQM practices. Basing on the literature cited above, 36 constructs
were developed to measure the performance of TQM practices in organizations
with and without ISO 9000 certification. The instrument was developed based
on six criteria, which were as follows:
(1) employee training and development;
(2) process management;
(3) quality measurement and benchmarking;
SMEs in
Malaysia
43
BIJ
10,1
Survey respondents
Of the 80 valid responses used in the final analysis, 44 (55 percent) were
completed by respondents of top management while 36 (45 percent) were
completed by respondents of middle management (see Table II).
44
Length of operation
The mean year of operation of all companies in the research sample was 10.35
years. Frequency tabulation reveals that four organizations (5 percent) have
operated less than five years while 32 (40 percent) operated between five and
nine years. 29 organizations (36.25 percent) has operated between 10-14 years
and 15 (18.75 percent) has operated between 15-50 years (see Table III).
Factor analysis
In order to group the 36 items in the questionnaire into meaningful clusters,
factor analysis was conducted via principal component analysis. Principal
component analysis was used because it seeks to include as many factors as
there are in the analysis. In considering the suitable rotation strategy,
Table I.
Industry breakdown
of ISO 9000 certified
and uncertified
firms
Table II.
Breakdown of the
frequency of
respondents that
completed the
questionnaires in
the study
Construction/engineering
Chemicals/extractives
Manufacturing (durable)
Manufacturing (non-durable)
Services
Total
Top management
Middle management
Total
Years in operation
Table III.
Breakdown on the
years of operations
of respondents in
the study
Less than 5
5-9
10-14
15-20
Total
ISO 9000-certified
ISO 9000-uncertified
Total
2
0
20
1
6
29
8
3
20
6
14
51
10
3
40
7
20
80
Frequency
Percent
44
36
80
55
45
100
Frequency
Percent
4
32
29
15
80
5
40
36.25
18.75
100
Factor
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
SMEs in
Malaysia
45
0.8754
0.9264
0.8156
0.8124
0.8190
0.7312
0.9213
Table IV.
Cronbach alpha for
factorial groups
BIJ
10,1
46
Employee
empowerment
and
development
Employee training
and development
Process
management
Criteria
0.641
0.704
0.542
0.567
0.705
0.454
0.700
0.677
0.649
0.412
X
0.560
0.650
0.646
VI
(continued)
0.470
SMEs in
Malaysia
47
Table V.
Varimax rotated
factor matrix of
items
Table V.
Information
availability
and analysis
Leadership
Quality
measurement
and benchmarking
Top management
commitment
0.583
0.562
0.436
0.520
0.403
0.636
0.513
0.535
0.465
0.554
0.754
0.608
0.633
0.447
0.672
0.655
0.436
0.630
0.737
0.616
0.441
VI
(continued)
0.515
0.554
48
Criteria
BIJ
10,1
Strategy
planning
Strategy and
planning
0.600
0.535
I
0.419
0.432
0.702
0.408
6.2
0.523
0.477
VI
0.548
0.736
0.587
0.448
0.568
0.424
16.3
14.3
11.2
9.7
9.5
Notes: Total variance explained 67.3 percent. Factor loadings smaller then 0.4 are suppressed and not reported in the Table
Variance explained
(percent)
Customer
management
and quality
satisfaction
Customer
involvement and
satisfaction
Criteria
SMEs in
Malaysia
49
Table V.
BIJ
10,1
Factors
50
Table VI.
t-test between ISO
9000 certified and
uncertified
organizations
Firms
Firms with without
ISO 9000
F-test
t-test
ISO 9000
Mean SD Mean SD ( p-value) ( p-value)
3.49
3.44
3.51
3.58
3.74
3.67
0.62
0.61
0.57
0.63
0.59
0.64
3.16
3.02
3.14
3.26
3.31
3.37
0.68
0.71
0.67
0.69
0.72
0.64
0.035*
0.000*
0.074
0.620*
0.001
0.856*
0.00**
0.00**
0.00**
0.00**
0.00**
0.01**
Notes: * For these factor groups, homogeneity of variance is not assumed. ** Tested significant
at 95 percent level of confidence
SMEs in
Malaysia
51
BIJ
10,1
52
References
Abdul Jalil, J. and Abdullah, H.S. (2000), The relationship between employee perceptions of ISO
9000 implementation and organizational outcomes: a study of a medium size service firm,
Proceedings of the 4th Asian Academy of Management (AAM) Conference 2001, Vol. 1.
Adam, E.E. Jr, Corbett, L.M., Harrison, N.J., Lee, T.S., Ho, R.B. and Samson, D. (1996), A study of
quality management practices and performance in Asia and South Pacific, Proceedings of
the First International Research Conference on Quality Management 1996, pp. 1-12.
Aziz, Z.A., Chan, J.F.L. and Metcalfe, A.V. (2000), Quality practices in the UK and Malaysia,
Total Quality Management, Vol. 11 No. 8, p. 1053.
Bagozzi, R.P. and Phillips, L.W. (1983), Requesting and testing organisational theories: a holistic
construct, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 18, pp. 133-45.
Binney, G. (1992), Making Quality Work: A Lesson from Europes Leading Companies, (Special
Report No. P655), The Economist and Intelligence Unit, London.
Bradley, M. (1994), Starting total quality management from ISO 9000, The TQM Magazine,
Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 50-4.
Garvin, D.A. (1991), How the Baldrige Award really works, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 69
No. 6, pp. 80-93.
Garvin, D.A. (1998), Managing Quality: Strategic and Competitive Edge, The Free Press,
New York, NY.
Gunasekaran, A., Korukonda, A.R. and Yli-Olli, P. (1994), Improving productivity and quality in
manufacturing organizations, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 36
No. 2, pp. 169-83.
Idris, M.A., McEwan, W. and Belavendram, N. (1996), The adoption of ISO 9000 and total
quality management in Malaysia, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 8 No. 5, pp. 65-8.
Kim, K.Y. and Im, J.H. (1993), Manufacturing environments in South Korea, Japan and the
United States of America: a note, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 10 No. 1,
pp. 87-94.
Mandal, P., Love, P.E.D., Sohal, A.S. and Bhadury, B. (2000), The propagation of quality
management concepts in the Indian manufacturing industry: some empirical
observations, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 12 No. 13, pp. 205-13.
Motwani, J. (2001), Critical factors and performance measures of TQM, The TQM Magazine,
Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 292-300.
Nunally, J.C. (1967), Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Poh, J.P. and Abd Hamid, A.Z. (2001), Total quality management (TQM) in Malaysia: a
comparative study on employees perception of management practices in TQM and
non-TQM companies, Proceedings of the 4th Asian Academy of Management (AAM)
Conference 2001, Vol. 1, pp. 158-67.
Powell, T.C. (1995), Total quality management as competitive advantage: a review and
empirical study, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 15-37.
Rahman, S. (2000), A comparative study of TQM practice and organizational performance of
SMEs with and without ISO 9000 certification, International Journal of Quality &
Reliability Management, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 35-49.
Reed, R., Lemak, D. and Montgomery, J. (1996), Beyond process: TQM content and firm
performance, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 173-203.
Rennie, K.M. (1997), Exploratory and confirmatory rotation strategies in exploratory factor
analysis, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research
Association, available at: http://ericae.net/ft/tamu/rota.htm (accessed December, 2002).
Sohal, A., Ramsay, L. and Samson, D. (1992), Quality management practices in Australian
industry, Total Quality Management, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 289-99.
Sohal, A.S. and Eddy, T. (1994), Quality Practices in Australian Manufacturing Firms, Monash
University/Ernst & Young Report, Melbourne.
Spencer, M.S. and Loomba, A.P.S. (2001), Total quality management programmes at smaller
manufacturers: benchmarking techniques and results, Total Quality Management, Vol. 12
No. 5, pp. 689-95.
Thiagaragan, T. and Zairi, M. (2001), A proposed model of TQM implementation based on
empirical study of Malaysian industry, International Journal of Quality & Reliability
Management, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 289-306.
Youssef, M.A. and Zairi, M. (1995), Benchmarking critical factors for TQM, part II empirical
results from different regions in the world, Benchmarking for Quality Management and
Technology, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 3-19.
SMEs in
Malaysia
53
16. Tutie Asrofah, Suhaiza Zailani, Yudi Fernando. 2010. Best practices for the effectiveness of benchmarking
in the Indonesian manufacturing companies. Benchmarking: An International Journal 17:1, 115-143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
17. PeiLee Teh, ChenChen Yong, Veeri Arumugam, KengBoon Ooi. 2009. Does total quality management
reduce employees' role conflict?. Industrial Management & Data Systems 109:8, 1118-1136. [Abstract]
[Full Text] [PDF]
18. Yean Pin Lee, Suhaiza Zailani, Keng Lin Soh. 2006. Understanding factors for benchmarking adoption.
Benchmarking: An International Journal 13:5, 548-565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
19. Mohd Nizam Ab Rahman, James D. T. Tannock. 2005. TQM Best Practices: Experiences of Malaysian
SMEs. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 16, 491-503. [CrossRef]
20. Jasmine A. L. Yeap, T. Ramayah, Osman Mohamad, Malliga MarimuthuExporting vs. Domestic SMEs
in Malaysia 276-293. [CrossRef]