11 views

Uploaded by DrBertram Forer

Twenty years ago, this puzzle appeared on a test administered to top-tier math students from 16 countries around the world. Only 10% of test takers got it right. In the U.S., only 4% managed to provide a correct response. Can you find the “simple” solution that so many intelligent students missed?

- Electrical Study Guide
- Proof of the Pythagorean Theorem using the Mean Proportional
- Mona Lisa Image of God(Isa-Av Ain From House of Truth)
- AT2H - Basics - Hindu Culture Part-1
- Cpp Programs
- Yr9Exam
- 2012_School_Countdown.pdf
- pythagoras theory
- Form2_maths Mind Maps
- 2008 State Countdown
- Maths Unit Test Paper Std 5
- Introduction to Trigonometry
- 76220749-Pythagorean-Information.pdf
- solar
- Copyright@PaGalGuy.com 10/22/2009 Page 1
- australianwajo09qa.pdf
- Test 5 Solutions
- LET - Mathematics 2
- Detailed Lesson Plan in Mathematics Sjunior
- print

You are on page 1of 16

Twenty years ago, this puzzle appeared on a test administered to top-tier math s

tudents from 16 countries around the world. Only 10% of test takers got it right

. In the U.S., only 4% managed to provide a correct response. Can you find the si

mple solution that so many intelligent students missed?

Earlier this week, a logic puzzle went viral. The riddle, which you can read her

e, challenged problem-solvers to determine someone s birthday, based on what seeme

d, at first glance, to be insufficient information. I opted not to feature the b

rain teaser on io9, because potential spoiler alert

I thought it too similar to

another puzzle I posted here a few months ago. So why do I mention it at all? Tw

o reasons.

Reason number one: It turns out the birthday riddle recently appeared on a math o

lympiad test for number-savvy high schoolers in Singapore. When I learned of the

problem s origins, I was immediately reminded of another puzzle, which, twenty yea

rs ago, bedeviled many of the world s sharpest high-school-aged math students.

The puzzle in question appears below, exactly as it did on a test administered i

n 1995 to students in their final year of secondary school in 16 countries aroun

d the world. The test was one of three developed by the International Associatio

n for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) to assess math and science

literacy around the globe. Unlike the other two tests in the series, this one w

as designed specifically for final-year students who had taken advanced mathemat

ics courses. The IEA later reported that this question stumped more students tha

n almost any other on the exam. Students in all participating countries found thi

s problem very difficult, reads the IEA s Third International Mathematics and Scien

ce Report. Only 10%, on average, provided a fully correct response, with another

2%, on average, receiving partial credit. Swedish students fared best, with 24% p

roviding full, correct answers. In the United States, just 4% of students were a

ble to provide a complete solution.

Reason number two: I hesitate to provide the second reason. I worry it would pro

vide too big a hint. I allude to it pretty directly above, in the headline and l

ede, but if you want a more explicit explanation, click here.

Art by Tara Jacoby

Sunday Puzzle #28: String Around the Rod

This 'Simple' Puzzle Once Stumped 96% of America's Top Math Students

We ll be back next week with the solution

and a new puzzle! Got a great braintease

r, original or otherwise, that you d like to see featured? E-mail me with your rec

ommendations. (Be sure to include Sunday Puzzle in the subject line.)

SOLUTION To Sunday Puzzle #27: Finger Counting

Last week, I asked you to determine the highest number that could be reached by

counting with the fingers on both hands (assuming, for the purposes of our puzzl

e, that thumbs are fingers, and that you are finger-counting with a total of ten

digits).

The solution to this puzzle (or, at least, the solution I was looking for) is 1,

023. The trick is to count not in base ten (which is how most of us learn to cou

nt on our fingers), but in base two. In this way, one can count as high as 31 us

ing the digits on one hand, and as high as 1,023 using the digits on both hands.

(Assuming they were nimble enough, you could use all your toes to count as high

as 11111111111111111111 in binary, which translates to 1,048,575.)

Many of you arrived at the binary solution, above, but I was even more impressed

with how many readers came up with ways to count even higher. Last week s comment

s are full of solutions that involve using different hand positions to increase

the maximum-countable-number multiple times over. Other commenters (who clearly

possess more dexterity than I do), suggested using partial-finger (i.e. bent-fin

ger) positioning to count in base three. Click here, then scroll down to the com

ments, to explore these alternate solutions.

Previous Weeks Puzzles

This Week s Puzzle Has A Very Simple Solution. Can You Find it?

Can You Solve This Extremely Difficult Star Trek Puzzle?

You Either Solve This Riddle, Or You Die

Can You Solve The Hardest Logic Puzzle In the World ?

You ll Need All 3 Clues To Solve This Puzzle

Think You Know The Solution To This Classic Riddle? Think Again.

100 Lives Are On The Line In This Week s Puzzle. How Many Can You Save?

Can You Figure Out This Parking Lot s Numbering System?

To Solve This Riddle, Look To Your Family

Solving This Puzzle Will Help You Grasp The True Nature Of Puzzles

Can You Guess The Next Number In This Sequence?

34

793Reply

All replies

The following replies are approved. To see additional replies that are pending a

pproval, click Show Pending. Warning: These may contain graphic material.

Show pending

Guywhothinksstuff

Guywhothinksstuff

ProfileFollow

GuywhothinksstuffRobbie Gonzalez

4/19/15 12:30pm

Follow guywhothinksstuff

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

20cm? That d be the square root of 16squared+12squared.

123Reply

Harley-Beckett

Harley-Beckett

ProfileFollow

Harley-BeckettGuywhothinksstuff

4/19/15 12:36pm

Follow harley-beckett

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

I m with you. The route travelled by the string is along the hypotenuse of four tr

iangles of base 4cm, height 3cm. 4 x 5cm = 20cm.

Does that make sense? I ve always sucked at showing my working...

67Reply

Guywhothinksstuff

Guywhothinksstuff

ProfileFollow

GuywhothinksstuffHarley-Beckett

4/19/15 1:18pm

Follow guywhothinksstuff

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

I worked it out slightly differently, by mapping the surface of the cylinder fou

r times next to each other (so 16cm total) and making the string a straight line

from the bottom of the first corner to the top of the last (so the hypotenuse o

f a 12x16 triangle). If I were smarter I would have seen that it circles four sm

aller cylinders 4 times ;)

23Reply

martinlalev

mart0o

ProfileFollow

mart0oGuywhothinksstuff

4/19/15 1:31pm

Follow martinlalev

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

i just came to this solution because of the toilet paper sitting next to me

79Reply

peculiarist

Peculiarist

ProfileFollow

PeculiaristHarley-Beckett

4/19/15 1:38pm

Follow peculiarist

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

That s what I did. I m pretty sure it s right.

3Reply

Show more replies in this thread

gigglesticks

gigglesticks

ProfileFollow

gigglesticksRobbie Gonzalez

4/19/15 1:12pm

Follow gigglesticks

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

I can understand how the solution, for the purpose of the problem, would be exac

tly 20 cm. But in our world, it would actually be a bit more, because of the wid

th of the twine.

If you wrap a piece of string around a cylinder, with the strands lying side by

side, still, it s traveling a little; that is, by the width of the string each tim

e. The wider the twine, the more it travels. Even if you managed to wrap each st

rand on top of the last one, like a coil, still, it s traveling a little with each

turn.

23Reply

peculiarist

Peculiarist

ProfileFollow

Peculiaristgigglesticks

4/19/15 1:40pm

Follow peculiarist

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

I think in maths we assume a 1-dimensional string...

56Reply

gfoulk

Gene

ProfileFollow

GenePeculiarist

4/19/15 1:49pm

Follow gfoulk

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

Yup. Reminds me of a joke about physics problems:

.

123Reply

davex495

Dave

ProfileFollow

Davegigglesticks

4/19/15 1:57pm

Follow davex495

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

It s still easy. Just make the radius = half the thickness of the twine + radius o

f rod. Then calculate for circumference.

7Reply

gigglesticks

gigglesticks

ProfileFollow

gigglesticksPeculiarist

4/19/15 2:07pm

Follow gigglesticks

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

And this is why I only got so far in algebra, and took up knitting.

27Reply

Show more replies in this thread

peculiarist

Peculiarist

ProfileFollow

PeculiaristRobbie Gonzalez

4/19/15 1:38pm

Follow peculiarist

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

I m going to go for 20 cm.

My working is: Convert the cylinder to a rectangle of length 12 and width 4.

If the string goes four times around the cylinder, it passes around the circumfe

rence four times, and can be drawn on the rectangle as four diagonal lines formi

ng two triangles and three parallelograms.

This divides the length of the rectangle into four pieces of 3 each. So the leng

th of the diagonal can be found via Pythagoras: a-squared + b-squared = c-square

d. In this case a=4 and b=3 to c=5. Since the string is represented by four diag

onal lines it is 4x5 = 20 cm long.

36Reply

peculiarist

Peculiarist

ProfileFollow

PeculiaristPeculiarist

4/19/15 1:42pm

Follow peculiarist

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

I think this puzzle is easy for people who have learned you can convert geometri

c shapes to other - simpler - geometric shapes, and difficult for people who hav

en t realised this.

47Reply

tenaj

Tenaj

ProfileFollow

TenajPeculiarist

4/19/15 1:59pm

Follow tenaj

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

Nice explanation.

And the fact that the numbers are so neat is a bit of a clue, too. It s a 3-4-5 ri

ght triangle, no need even to break out a calculator.

4Reply

taylorsmurphy

Taylor M

ProfileFollow

Taylor MPeculiarist

4/19/15 2:09pm

Follow taylorsmurphy

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

Yeah, all you have to do is imagine rolling the tube and the string coming off o

n a table, and you ll have a triangle, one side would be the length of the tube, t

he other would be the distance it has rolled, and the hypotenuse would be the st

ring between them.

26Reply

peculiarist

Peculiarist

ProfileFollow

PeculiaristTaylor M

4/19/15 2:34pm

Follow peculiarist

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

The benefit to your method is that the string doesn t have to be imagined wrapped

around the cylinder evenly.

1Reply

Show more replies in this thread

thebrainofchris

justvisiting

ProfileFollow

justvisitingRobbie Gonzalez

4/19/15 12:26pm

Follow thebrainofchris

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

Why isn t it 16cm? (Four times the circumference)

8Reply

e_is_real_i_isnt

e_is_real_i_isnt

ProfileFollow

e_is_real_i_isntjustvisiting

4/19/15 12:28pm

Follow e_is_real_i_isnt

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

Hint: Triangle.

34Reply

will-holz

Will Holz

ProfileFollow

Will Holze_is_real_i_isnt

4/19/15 12:46pm

Follow will-holz

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

Hint: Triangle.

Hint Addendum: Triangle formerly known as triangles.

8Reply

contact_Feanor

contact_Feanor

ProfileFollow

contact_Feanorjustvisiting

4/19/15 1:54pm

Follow contact_feanor

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

because you re not moving parallel to the base of the cylinder. If you think of it

as a square, you re moving along the diagonal, your solution is like suggesting t

hat the diagonal has the same length as the side of the square...

2Reply

stealheadtrout

stealheadtrout

ProfileFollow

stealheadtroutWill Holz

4/19/15 3:52pm

Follow stealheadtrout

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

Will you need to use this math symbol?

59Reply

Show more replies in this thread

hawkinggo

hawkingdo

ProfileFollow

hawkingdoRobbie Gonzalez

4/19/15 6:22pm

Follow hawkinggo

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

Four times the circumference, once the length.

4*4 + 12 = 28cm ... did I miss something?

17Reply

hawkinggo

hawkingdo

ProfileFollow

hawkingdohawkingdo

4/19/15 6:30pm

Follow hawkinggo

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

People below/above keep wanting to transform the cylinder into a rectangle ... s

o I ll bite.

Let s say the cylinder is length 12 cm and width 4 cm. The string goes in a straig

ht line up the length (12 cm). But along the width it goes a space that is 4 tim

es the width. So it creates a triangle that is length (12 cm) and width (4*4 cm

= 16 cm).

The hypotenuse is then sqrt(12^2 + 16^2) = sqrt(144+256) = sqrt(400) = 20 cm. So

I did miss something, what did I miss?

4Reply

garabyte

Luis Adrin Pea

ProfileFollow

Luis Adrin Peahawkingdo

4/19/15 6:47pm

Follow garabyte

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

Yes. High school, apparently.

16Reply

hawkinggo

hawkingdo

ProfileFollow

hawkingdohawkingdo

4/19/15 6:49pm

Follow hawkinggo

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

Breaking it into smaller pieces, let s go around once. That s a width of 4 cm and a

length of (12/4 = 3 cm). Along a straight line it would be the hypotenuse of a t

riangle with 3, 4, 5 cm sides). That makes sense since doing so four times equal

s 20 cm. My original conjecture was that is should equal 4 cm + 3 cm = 7 cm, whi

ch would make sense if the total length was 28 cm and is the same if I traveled

the length and then the width instead of the diagonal along the hypotenuse.

What I missed was that it didn t travel the full length of the cylinder and four t

imes around the cylinder (28 cm). In reality each time it went around the cylind

er it took a path through the diagonal of the rectangle (see below).

35Reply

hawkinggo

hawkingdo

ProfileFollow

hawkingdoLuis Adrin Pea

4/19/15 6:59pm

Follow hawkinggo

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

You re adorable. And a strong reminder that I most certainly do not miss high scho

ol.

78Reply

Show more replies in this thread

ilm0stro

IlMostro

ProfileFollow

IlMostroRobbie Gonzalez

4/19/15 3:11pm

Follow ilm0stro

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

My 2 cents...

The string wraps exactly 4 times around the rod. Let s imagine the rod vertically

for visual convenience.

Since the wrapping is symmetrical, each time the string makes a complete wrap ar

ound the rod (front and back), the difference in heigh between the point where t

he string begins wrapping (h1) and the point where it ends the wrap (h2) is 12cm

4 = 3cm. We will call this difference h.

Consequentially, the string makes half a wrap with a difference in height betwee

n starting and ending point that is h/2 = 3cm 2 = 1,5cm

Let s calculate the diameter (d) of the rod by dividing the circumference of the r

od (4cm) by Pi So d= 4cm 3,14 = 1,2738853503184713376cm

Now, consider the ellipses that has as a minor axis (a1) the diameter of the rod

(d) and as a major axis (a2) the straight line that goes from the starting to t

he ending point of the string as it makes half a wrap along the rod.

We can calculate the

he hypotenuse (i) of

rod (a = d) and the

the string in half a

the right triangle that has for catheti the diameter of the

height difference between the starting and ending point of

wrap (b= h/2). Check the image for reference.

thanks to Pitagora (powered by google calculator :D) we know that the hypothenus

e is equal to the square roots of the sum of the catheti. In this case... i = 1.

97

But why do we need this ellipse axis? As it makes a wrap around the rod, the str

ing runs along this ellipse circumference (to and fro the major axis extremities

), so the length of the string for half a wrap corresponds to half the circumfer

ence of said ellipse, and the length of the string as it makes one complete wrap

equals two times this length, which is the entire circumference of the ellipses

.

L (one wrap) = C

We need only half of the two axis to calculate the ellipse circumference.

a1/2 = d/2 = 1.2738853503184713376cm/2 = 0.6369426751592356688cm

a2/2 = i/2 = 1.97/2 = 0.985cm

And like hell I am going write integrals using my iPad, so we will trust the mig

hty google calculator again, which uses a Ramanujan approximation to calculate t

he circumference and who am I to disagree

C = 5.15cm

We said that C equals the length of one wrap of string (two times half a wrap)

So multiply the thing by four wraps and you have the total length of the string.

L = L (one wrap ) * 4 = 5.15cm * 4 = 20.6cm

7Reply

kenudiggit

Ken U Diggit

ProfileFollow

Ken U DiggitIlMostro

4/19/15 5:14pm

Follow kenudiggit

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

Interesting approach, but the wraps do not make ellipses.

shows the string making a zig-zag pattern (and if you cut

se lines, you would indeed get ellipses) but in actuality

sinusoidal in that view. The correct answer, as many have

(assuming a 1D string).

2Reply

ilm0stro

IlMostro

the cylinder along tho

the string would look

noted, is exactly 20cm

ProfileFollow

IlMostroKen U Diggit

4/19/15 5:39pm

Follow ilm0stro

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

Ah shoot, cosine wave. Well there is probably an elegant function to solve this

the hard way, but sure as hell I won t be the one to dwell on it. Pitagora it is :

D

1Reply

jay1234l

Jay

ProfileFollow

JayIlMostro

4/19/15 6:17pm

Follow jay1234l

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

This method is very complicated, but it seems like it should give the same resul

t, but for some reason, it seems like it does not, exactly. I tried using a TI-8

9 without any explicit approximations and I got a sum that converges to 5.14915

Reply

ilm0stro

IlMostro

ProfileFollow

IlMostroJay

4/20/15 6:00am

Follow ilm0stro

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

As Ken U Diggit correctly pointed out to me, unfortunately it doesn t work because

the string does not follow the circumference of an exact cross section of the c

ylinder, an ellipse, but rather it has a sinusoidal trend. If we wanted to go th

e complicate way, we would have to determine the arc length of the curve using i

ntegration.

like so

Reply

Show more replies in this thread

ejs2000

ejs2000

ProfileFollow

ejs2000Robbie Gonzalez

4/20/15 9:01am

Follow ejs2000

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

Okay, I m posting this without looking at anyone else s comments first.

To find the length of the string, unwind it from around the cylinder. To unwind

one loop requires the cylinder to rotate once around entirely, meaning it travel

s a distance of 4 cm. There are four loops, so it must roll 16 cm to unwind full

y.

This diagram I made shows that the string (in red) winds up being the hypotenuse

of a right triangle, which has 16 cm of distance on one side and the 12 cm leng

th of the cylinder on the other side. Since the Pythagorean theorem dictates in

this case that a^2+b^2=c^2, thus 16^2+12^2=L^2, thus 256+144=L^2, thus 400=L^2,

thus L=20. (And since I made the diagram to scale, I was able to confirm this an

swer by measuring it.)

Okay, now off to read everyone else s comments and see if anyone solved this more

simply!

7Reply

ejs2000

ejs2000

ProfileFollow

ejs2000ejs2000

4/20/15 9:11am

Follow ejs2000

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

Okay, looks like the people who did solve it correctly generally use the same te

chnique, or solve for the length of just one loop and multiply by four. So yay,

I got it right.

Reply

josephpettit

Xusn96

ProfileFollow

Xusn96ejs2000

4/20/15 9:16am

Follow josephpettit

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

Your figure makes the math confusing.

This simplifies it IMO such that say you cut the cylinder vertically thus having

your 4cm top and bottom the mark out your 12cm length and so on......

3Reply

sharpenhauer999

sharpenhauer999

ProfileFollow

sharpenhauer999ejs2000

4/20/15 1:18pm

Follow sharpenhauer999

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

Ah, okay. Now *this* makes sense. Thank you.

1Reply

slynilo03

Nilo

ProfileFollow

Niloejs2000

4/21/15 6:04am

Follow slynilo03

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

Wouldn t the string need to hit the top side of the cylinder 4 times? In my head y

our drawing only covers 2 circles and forgets about the back of the cylinder. I

got ~34.17cm using a zig-zag type drawing (shown a lot in the comments) but ende

d up with 8 4x1.5cm triangles (or 4 8x3 triangles would also work)

Reply

Show more replies in this thread

saulholguindelacruz01

Tauromachy

ProfileFollow

TauromachyRobbie Gonzalez

4/19/15 1:31pm

Follow saulholguindelacruz01

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

about 52 cm, math to follow in an edit

the trick it to cut a representation of the surface into a rectangle. That gives

a rectangle with side lengths of 4pi cm and 12 cm.

You then cut that shape into 4 smaller rectangles with sides of 4pi cm and 3 cm

in length.

The string will represent a line cutting the rectangles into two right triangles

.

You then solve for the hypotenuse of a triangle: sqrt(4pi^2+3^2) to get about 13

, multiply by four (because there are four of these triangles), then you get abo

ut 52.

7Reply

semicynical

semicynical

ProfileFollow

semicynicalTauromachy

4/19/15 1:55pm

Follow semicynical

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

If the circumference of the rod is 4 cm, why are the side lengths of the rectang

le not 4 cm?

4Reply

contact_Feanor

contact_Feanor

ProfileFollow

contact_FeanorTauromachy

4/19/15 1:56pm

Follow contact_feanor

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

the circumference is 4, not the radius.. same logic gives 20, like others sugges

ted

13Reply

saulholguindelacruz01

Tauromachy

ProfileFollow

Tauromachycontact_Feanor

4/19/15 2:05pm

Follow saulholguindelacruz01

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

Well that s why reading comprehension is so important...I did think the math had a

few more decimal places than normal this week. Thanks for the heads up.

6Reply

saulholguindelacruz01

Tauromachy

ProfileFollow

Tauromachysemicynical

4/19/15 2:07pm

Follow saulholguindelacruz01

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

Because I misread the problem.

4Reply

Show more replies in this thread

nativeplant

Native Plant

ProfileFollow

4/19/15 3:40pm

Follow nativeplant

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

It goes around 4 times. 4 x 4 cm = 16 cm

It also has to go the length of the cylinder 12 cm.

28 cm

14Reply

turkeyhundt

turkeyhundt

ProfileFollow

turkeyhundtNative Plant

4/19/15 4:03pm

Follow turkeyhundt

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

It doesn t work that way. If a city is 12 miles north of you and 16 miles east. It

isn t 28 miles away. It is 20 miles away. You have to create a diagonal. While tr

aveling those 20 miles you cover the 12 miles north and the 16 miles east.

10Reply

nativeplant

Native Plant

ProfileFollow

Native Plantturkeyhundt

4/19/15 6:43pm

Follow nativeplant

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

I was going with the simple thing, so I tried to take anything complicated at all

out if it to prevent overthinking. Then I read the very simple explanation someo

ne else gave of rolling it out, it would create a hypotenuse of length X and bas

e 12 and height 16. I saw that picture in my head was also a very simple answer

3-4-5 x 4

4Reply

encyclia

Encyclia

ProfileFollow

Encycliaturkeyhundt

4/20/15 6:54am

Follow encyclia

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

There s no diagonal or shortcut without going through the cylinder body. You still h

ave to go around 4 times and transverse the length. Doesn t matter how you wrap it

either.

3Reply

turkeyhundt

turkeyhundt

ProfileFollow

turkeyhundtEncyclia

4/20/15 8:52am

Follow turkeyhundt

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

There is a diagonal. Unroll the cylinder.

5Reply

Show more replies in this thread

RobinBobcat

RobinBobcat

ProfileFollow

RobinBobcatRobbie Gonzalez

4/20/15 4:26am

Follow robinbobcat

Flag

Share to Facebook

Share to Pinterest

Share to Twitter

Go to permalink

Aha! Had this one back in high school! The teacher liked my solution the best, b

ecause I even drew diagrams.

Pretend that the cylinder is instead a paper tube, and the string is a spirallin

g cut. If you unroll this, you wind up with a parallelogram, which are really ea

sy to find lengths of sides.

*cracks knuckles* Ok, we are trying to find the length of the two long sides of th

e parallelogram, which really means that you want the hypotenuse of the triangle

that is its height and length. Length is given as 12 cm, and... Oh come on, the

y even give the circumference? I had to figure out from a diameter! Ok, since th

e string/cut goes around four times, height is going to be four times the circum

ference of 4 cm, or 16 cm.

Per Mssr. Pythagoras:

a^2 + b^2 = c^2

12^2 + 16^2 = c^2

144 + 256 = 400

v400 = 20

The length of the string is 20 cm. Quo Est Demonstatum

2Reply

imagiro

Mario

ProfileFollow

- Electrical Study GuideUploaded byHM5
- Proof of the Pythagorean Theorem using the Mean ProportionalUploaded bywilburhoo
- Mona Lisa Image of God(Isa-Av Ain From House of Truth)Uploaded byChristian Flores
- AT2H - Basics - Hindu Culture Part-1Uploaded byapi-3764210
- Cpp ProgramsUploaded bysatish kulkarni
- Yr9ExamUploaded byKarenChoi
- 2012_School_Countdown.pdfUploaded bySri Raghavan
- pythagoras theoryUploaded byapi-395016488
- Form2_maths Mind MapsUploaded byHazari Abdul Halim
- 2008 State CountdownUploaded byMichael
- Maths Unit Test Paper Std 5Uploaded byOvesh Sheth
- Introduction to TrigonometryUploaded byTueNguyen
- 76220749-Pythagorean-Information.pdfUploaded byPhani Kumar
- solarUploaded bysalman_adam88
- Copyright@PaGalGuy.com 10/22/2009 Page 1Uploaded byvishnu_mcj
- australianwajo09qa.pdfUploaded bySusilo Wati
- Test 5 SolutionsUploaded byAswin Kumar Tiriya
- LET - Mathematics 2Uploaded byChod Dandoy
- Detailed Lesson Plan in Mathematics SjuniorUploaded byAnn-gelyn Licudan Villanueva
- printUploaded byapi-201463234
- vernal 1Uploaded byapi-251156891
- math keyUploaded byTaha Muhammad Ali
- Sample Paper Gr 8 NewUploaded bylock_jaw30
- 3ro 1.pdfUploaded byNatanael Zuniga Avila
- w210501-3 (1).pdfUploaded byEmily Stuart
- 700001089_Topper_2_110_6_3_Mathematics_questions_up201506182029_1434639560_4029Uploaded bynanduanjua
- Thomas-Little-Heath-Archimedes.pdfUploaded byPlayfull Rival
- CAS Mathematical Methods practice exam year 10Uploaded byJesse Waechter-Cornwill
- 2006 BONDO DISTRICT PAPER 2 ANSWERS.docUploaded byUC Ilozue
- Math quizUploaded byFrances Noel Carvajal

- Enneagram QuestTest1Uploaded byDrBertram Forer
- HL Frankl 02Uploaded byDrBertram Forer
- 20 Uses of Vicks VaporubUploaded byDrBertram Forer
- Did MH370 GLIDE Down With Pilot at the Controls - Not CrashUploaded byDrBertram Forer
- How the Eyes Betray Your ThoughtsUploaded byDrBertram Forer
- Does the Typical (You Create Your Own Reality) Belief System Have an Inherent ContradictionUploaded byDrBertram Forer
- Two poemsUploaded byDrBertram Forer
- Dragon Slayer 03Uploaded byDrBertram Forer
- Lactic Acid is Not Muscles Foe, Its FuelUploaded byDrBertram Forer
- Kilroy Was HereUploaded byDrBertram Forer
- Water Study by Post Grad Students in the USAUploaded byDrBertram Forer
- Why Its Crucial That Young Scientists Are Taught the Value of Being Wrong -2Uploaded byDrBertram Forer
- Penny Vincenzo, 'Theres One Born Every Minute'Uploaded byDrBertram Forer
- Dragon Slayer 02Uploaded byDrBertram Forer
- Why Its Crucial That Young Scientists Are Taught the Value of Being WrongUploaded byDrBertram Forer
- Dragon Slayer 01Uploaded byDrBertram Forer
- Isaac Asimov, Gold (1995), Satire of 'the Sensuous Woman' (1984)Uploaded byDrBertram Forer
- Does Every Creative Genius Need a Bitter Rival (Jung)Uploaded byDrBertram Forer
- How Babies Think - Manual ExtractsUploaded byDrBertram Forer
- Padded = Does she need a Power Plant -Uploaded byDrBertram Forer
- You Know AI Has Reached 'Intelligence' Status, When It Has Learned to CheatUploaded byDrBertram Forer
- Does She Need a Power PlantUploaded byDrBertram Forer
- First US Case of Sexually Transmitted Zika Confirmed in TexasUploaded byDrBertram Forer
- Doing It Right, Isaac Asimov, 1978Uploaded byDrBertram Forer
- Brent Rushal, Taper 1993Uploaded byDrBertram Forer
- 12 Graces, Old and NewUploaded byDrBertram Forer
- SDSS-III SkyServer Famous PlacesUploaded byDrBertram Forer
- India Plans Asian Tidal Power FirstUploaded byDrBertram Forer
- BSAC Survival Time vs Water Temperature (Markers)Uploaded byDrBertram Forer

- Addition of vectors.docxUploaded bybookdotcom7221
- 03-08-201412thAdv (P-1)Uploaded byasuhass
- A Common Book of piUploaded bykaushik247
- Math 1Uploaded byBitoy Aguila
- mathsUploaded bymajoo125
- Geometry TipsUploaded bysheikarafat
- 2018 qp.pdfUploaded bykarthick32mech
- plp performance based assessmentUploaded byapi-319402958
- Mathematics for Grade 5 TeachersUploaded byMaylyne Joyce Candado
- ComplexUploaded byKamran Ahmed
- Aryabhata paperUploaded byvatsal
- Geometry for DraftingUploaded bybrian Decker
- triangles unit test assessmentUploaded byapi-252821229
- csc reviewer.docxUploaded byGeorgeZamora
- Presentation Triangle Midpoint TheoremUploaded bypriya86240
- 2016 Contest Final VersionUploaded byroh009
- Introduction to Trigonometry for Grade 10Uploaded byboris pocus
- Flashcards - Quantitative Aptitude Revision Maths ShortcutsUploaded byCATMentor
- PythagorasUploaded byAleks
- 2012_Chapter_Competition_Solutions.pdfUploaded bySri Raghavan
- TrigonometryUploaded byRan Baltazar
- 4th-pretest-g-8-18-19Uploaded byNapoleon Paris
- 02. Basic Engineering Correlation TrigonometryUploaded byJannine Joyce Bergonio
- dll.docxUploaded byRams Polledorep
- hacking_math_class_peter_farrell.pdfUploaded byStephenFreitas
- 10 Mathematics Problems Chapters 1 to 6Uploaded bySubhash Soman
- High School Geometry Days 054067Uploaded byeclecticOTA
- Geometry JpanUploaded byJaime Guevara Vasquez
- Theorems MathsUploaded byDeepika Madhusoothanan
- hw week 3Uploaded byapi-370025247