Dr Z

Joseph Zernik, PhD PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750; Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net Blog: http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs

Digitally signed by Joseph H Zernik DN: cn=Joseph H Zernik, o, ou, email=jz12345@e arthlink.net, c=US Location: La Verne, California Date: 2010.02.09 06:04:19 -08'00'

09-03-04 Records that were faxed from “Judicial Services” to the Sheriff’s Department and were later filed on May 1, 2009 as purported records that provided the foundation of the arrest and booking of Richard fine, in response by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, under Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus - Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914)
The attached court records of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles are deemed false and deliberately misleading records for reasons including, but not limited to the following: 1. The fax header data indicated that such records were faxed from “Judicial Services” to the Sheriff’s Department with no cover sheet, and therefore, with no authentication at all. 2. Such records were faxed only at 4:31pm according to the fax header imprint, whereas the booking was purported to have been executed at 12:32 pm. Therefore, such records could not possibly be the foundation for the purported booking. 3. The purported booking was falsely listed in the Sheriff’s online Inmate Information Center, as executed pursuant to the authority of the Municipal Court, City of San Pedro. In contrast, the attached records were purported to imply the authority for the arrest and booking pursuant to purported records of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Central District, City of Los Angeles. 4. The attached records were filed on May 1, 2009 under caption of Fine v Sheriff by Attorney Kevin McCormick on behalf of the Superior Court of California and Judge David Yaffe. However, the litigation records of Fine v Sheriff failed to include the required certifications of Attorney Kevin McCormick as Counsel of Record for the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. 5. The attached records were filed by Attorney Kevin McCormick with declaration by counsel only, and with no declaration by Judge David Yaffe, by Presiding Judge Charles McCoy, by Clerk of the Court John A Clarke, or by any other officer of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. Kevin McCormick was not a competent fact witness in this matter, and therefore such filing was insufficient. 6. The attached records were filed by Attorney Kevin McCormick with no authentication at all. Therefore, such records could not be accepted as honest, valid, and effectual records of the Court, which required “full faith and credit” pursuant to the US Constitution, Article IV, §1. 7. The attached records failed to include an honest, valid, and effectual warrant for the arrest of Richard Fine. 8. The purported March 4, 2009 Judgment record was stamped on its front page “Filed” with the date March 4, 2009. In contrast it was signed on its final page by Judge David Yaffe with the date of March 24, 2009. Such record could not possibly be deemed an honest, valid, and effectual Judgment record of the Court. 9. Although Sheriff Lee Baca was rightly named as Respondent in the Petition, the Sheriff refused to respond. 10. In January 8, 2010 Letter by Los Angeles Supervisor, the Honorable Michael Antonovich, Sheriff Lee Baca’s December 29, 2009 Response was provided to inquiry by County of Los Angeles Supervisor, the Honorable Michael Antonovich. In his December 29, 2009 Response Sheriff Lee Baca refused to produce such records as part of the arrest and booking records of Richard Fine. Instead, the Sheriff’s response stated that California Public Records Act did not require production of records which did not exist.

Case 2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW

Document 16-2

Filed 05/01/2009

Page 1 of 16

Case 2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW

Document 16-2

Filed 05/01/2009

Page 2 of 16

Case 2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW

Document 16-2

Filed 05/01/2009

Page 3 of 16

Case 2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW

Document 16-2

Filed 05/01/2009

Page 4 of 16

Case 2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW

Document 16-2

Filed 05/01/2009

Page 5 of 16

Case 2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW

Document 16-2

Filed 05/01/2009

Page 6 of 16

Case 2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW

Document 16-2

Filed 05/01/2009

Page 7 of 16

Case 2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW

Document 16-2

Filed 05/01/2009

Page 8 of 16

Case 2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW

Document 16-2

Filed 05/01/2009

Page 9 of 16

Case 2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW

Document 16-2

Filed 05/01/2009

Page 10 of 16

Case 2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW

Document 16-2

Filed 05/01/2009

Page 11 of 16

Case 2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW

Document 16-2

Filed 05/01/2009

Page 12 of 16

Case 2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW

Document 16-2

Filed 05/01/2009

Page 13 of 16

Case 2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW

Document 16-2

Filed 05/01/2009

Page 14 of 16

Case 2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW

Document 16-2

Filed 05/01/2009

Page 15 of 16

Case 2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW

Document 16-2

Filed 05/01/2009

Page 16 of 16