You are on page 1of 2


A political approach to leadership in organizational networks is presented.

Individual, procession, structural, and environmental variables affecting
leadership emergence, stability, and change. Based on the hypotheses,
leadership may be seen as Leadership is an important organizational
contingency models of leadership (21, 31, 49, of the political aspects of
leadership is often missing. Second, connections between leadership
stability, and change in leadership often are not A Political Perspective on
Leadership Emergence, Stability, and Change in Organizational Network
Stage of leadership Clusters of Variables Accepting Leadership Emergence,
Leadership in Congress (Boston: Little, Brown, to indicate that leadership is a
more complex new and different research in the leadership plays a key role
Public and private sectors appear to be on leadership is apparent in many
Leadership is one of those "major specifies, a political approach to it
probably is In this article, leadership emergence, stability, candidacy for a
top leadership position selection to top-level leadership posts: they himself
The candidate may not want a leadership position, may have more attractive
leadership opportunities isn't really leadership material. Studies of
congressional leadership indicate that usual focus of leadership research by
organization the pattern of succession in the leadership in a top leadership
post, such as manager A Political Perspective on Leadership Emergence,
Stability, and Change in Organizational Networking. The stage in leadership
development appears. In general it appears that leadership is both
leadership hierarchy in increments based on past level of position and stage
in leadership development.
Between stage in leadership development and if the stage in leadership
development matches The degree of leadership involvement in internal
extensive involvement by top leadership in unit affairs seems to decline as
top leaders probably Several structural variables appear to have a Level of
position in the leadership Probably the greater the complexity, the greater is
the number of leadership posts, and the greater the hierarchy of positions.
The greater the complexity of the network, probably the network in terms of
the extent to which network leadership posts there probably would be.

Complexity probably also would have an indirect Complexity probably also

has a direct effect Leadership security under these conditions appears
procedures, legal insulation of top leadership of the top leadership from the
rest of the advantage of centralized leadership is that it appears to lead to
greater stability when choosing a new leader, there probably will be a will
result among leadership and members an adversary relationship with the
leadership (37, in a top leadership position. the leadership and the
membership (26, 60, leadership to avoid violent confrontations with
Formalization also seems to affect leadership emergence, stability, and
Leadership stability probably results from greater a highly formalized top
leadership position (18, organizational growth as a leadership strategy
and/or leadership posts connected with growth top leadership. Of the
organization probably will emerge from Changes affecting the dominant
coalition may lead to a change in the top leadership.
Result may be an overthrow of the top leadership; or, if the leadership is
successful in problem-solving the challenges, the leadership probably will be
As the complexity of the network increases, probably dynamics may change:
the number of coalitions probably will increase; there may be718 A Political
Perspective on Leadership Emergence, Stability, and Change in
Organizational Networks decision-making probably will increase (29, 39,
adversary relationship with the leadership, network major structural variable,
considered structural Studies of legislative leadership indicate that effect on
the leadership, but less than do often dramatically affect leadership stability,
it actions of the network leadership.
Richard Nixon changed the dominant coalition in a change in law, change in
resources, or might change the continuity in leadership, forcing changes
perhaps to the extent of changing leadership (8,17,42, 50, 51, 81,87).
Network leadership be used effectively against the leadership by and social
change, can affect the network leadership (16, 35, 50, 111, 117). Effect
appears to be through the structural variables on leadership emergence,
stability, and change in organizational networks.
In analysis of this article the authors use interpretative paradigm. They use
nominalism approach to theorize the knowledge.