You are on page 1of 5

NIRMA UNIVERSITY

INSTITUTE OF LAW
INTERNSHIP COMMITTEE
TRIAL COURT INTERNSHIP

Weekly Report
Name of the Student

Mayank Soni

Name of the Advocate

Shri Joga Ram Patel

Advocates Address

567 , Ramalaya , 8th c road sardarpura ,Jodhpur

Email

Phone/Mobile No.

: 094142-94788
:

From 5th Nov.2011 to 12th Dec 2011

Period:

_____________________
Signature of the Advocate

_____________________
Signature of the Student

Sr.
No.

Work done at Court

Had an informal interaction with Advocates Mr. Joga Ram Patel sir, Mr. Manish

Name of the Signature of


immediate
supervisor
supervisor

Patel sir and discussed the ongoing matters which he is dealing with. Got
acquainted with the surroundings of the Court
.

Understood basic working procedure of High court, observed various ongoing

proceedings
During court hours I use to observe proceeding of cases contested by my firm
where I was interning and other cases.

_____________________
Signature of the Advocate

_____________________
Signature of the Student

Sr.
No.

Work done at Chambers/Office

First three days were spent in research and drafting of writ of below mentioned

Name of the Signature of


immediate
supervisor
supervisor

case
Case 1. Daniel furniture Ltd V. OIL India LTD
High court Room no. 7 ,J.Sangeet lodha
Laws applicable Constitution ,Companies law ,General Financial rules 2005
Counsel for petitioner
writ petition filled by petitioner under 226 of constitution of India ,on the ground
that oil India Limited subsidiary of government of India in its notice for its
invitation of tender for supply of furniture asked only for particular brand namely
godrej ,so we were given task of finding legal provision as to whether there is
legal provision against asking of particular brand in its tender by government
subsidiaries ,so as per our instruction we researched various literature on
government tenders and various case laws ,and had analysis general financial
rules and government contract rules and cottage and small scale industry
protection rules that have rule against asking of particular brand by government
_____________________
Signature of the Advocate

_____________________
Signature of the Student

subsidiaries ,also there was other legal issue was involved regarding object clause
of AOA of petitioner co. as the tender was composite and petitioner co. mentioned
only furniture relating work in its ,so after detailed research we were taught
drafting writ petition.
2

Daniel furniture Ltd V. R.B.S.E.


High court Room no. 7 ,J.Sangeet lodha
Laws applicable Constitution ,Companies law ,General Financial rules
Rajasthan 2005,Rajasthan preservation of cottage and small scale Industries rules
Counsel for petitioner
writ petition filled by petitioner under 226 of constitution of India ,on the ground
that RBSE a subsidiary of government of Rajasthan in its notice for its invitation
of tender for supply of furniture asked only for particular brand ,so we given task
of researching statuary and legal provisions by government of Rajasthan against
asking of particular brand by government subsidiaries and in for this case with the

assistance from my mentor I drafted writ for this case.


Gone through the brief and researched for relevant legal provision in Case
Arjun Garg V. State of Rajasthan

_____________________
Signature of the Advocate

_____________________
Signature of the Student

Relating to Elections
Council for petitioner
Facts Writ petition against government of Rajasthan ,In which MLA listed under
voter list of Falodi constituency was nominated as member Bilara vegetable and
fruit market committee in contravention of Rajasthan food and market committee
4

rule 1961 ,we were given task of finding relevant legal provisions in our favor
Gone through the brief and researched for relevant legal provision in Case

Nema Ram V. state of Rajasthan


Learned how to draft a writ ,and drafted writ in case Daniel furniture Ltd V. R.
B.S.E

_____________________
Signature of the Advocate

_____________________
Signature of the Student