17 views

Uploaded by kats2404

Ducted Fan

save

- Calibration Webinar March 2009
- 2015 Lect5 Flow Measurement
- 129-31850
- Orifice Calculation
- 1815_appb.pdf
- Modules16101x Current
- Module dua
- 12-2015-0271- Primary Elements.pdf
- fmsel
- Basic Instrument
- Liquid Flow Measurement
- Flow
- RESULT,DISCUSSION,Calculation,Conclusion
- Force Weight Flow Measurement
- Flow Induced Vibration of a Light Circular Cylinder
- On the Flow of a Compressible-Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers
- Change Over Valve Catalog En
- Hydraulics Learning Manual
- Wind Turbines
- CAT 8750_2012_English
- Fluid Mechanics QB,(1)
- Investigation and Computational Analysis of Divergent Orifice in Fuel Injector Nozzle
- DEVELOPMENT OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (UAV) FOR WILDLIFE SURVEILLANCE
- MA2003-Tutorials 7-11(1)
- june11_DL
- JSDEWES_0060
- Mae 331 Lecture 3
- Wings, Round Cylinders and Circulation
- COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF AIRFOIL NACA0015
- Hydraulic Servo Valve
- EDF Comparison
- کليات_ضوابط_تاسيسات
- Combined Gearbox
- Cabin Boom Noise Damping
- Us 5890441
- Computer Controlled Air Isolation System
- StackEconomizer CRE-CCE Boiler Book
- M240 Mount
- CB-8491 Heat Recovery Brochure
- Heat Exchangers
- F135 Engine Specification
- Helio Services
- Thin Gap Brochure 2015 Web
- Us 7249732
- Gas Metering System-Woodward_Swift
- Mil Hdbk 1783b
- Silicone Molding
- Propeller
- IC 900 IC 910 Ignition Controller
- رنگ حرارت بالا
- Mil Hdbk 1783b Notice 1
- Constant Speed Propeller
- IC 900 IC 910 Ignition Controller
- راهنماي جامع توليد همزمان برق و حرارت
- BOOSTER - English
- MT Propellers
- Variable Pitch Constant Speed Propellers for Light Aircraft
- ميكروتوربين هاي گازي
- Besander TD English 02

You are on page 1of 3

**In response to modifying the hull and skirt size, it was decided to reexamine the
**

fluid dynamics of the lift system. This involved calculating the cushion pressure,

volumetric flow rate and the pressure inside of the hull.

The estimated weight of the hovercraft is 650lbs and the craft footprint is 7’x10’.

Based on these characteristics, the pressure required inside the air cushion to negate

the craft’s weight can be found from:

Pcu

650 lbf

70 ft 2

F

A

9.29

lbf

ft 2

(1)

**Where Pcu is the pressure required inside the cushion in pounds per feet squared, F
**

is the load imposed by the hovercraft weight in pounds per feet squared, and A is

the hovercraft footprint in ft2. Converting to psi, 9.29lb/ft2 = 0.0645psi.

According to Bernoulli’s equation, the existing velocity of the air from under the

skirt through the gap made from the craft hovering can be calculated by:

Vexit

Dc

2 Pcu

air

47.34

ft

s

(2)

**Where Vexit is the exit velocity of the air in ft/s, Dc is the discharge coefficient and
**

ρair is the density of air in slugs/ft3. The velocity is assumed to be zero at an

arbitrary distance from the craft, so that the pressure is simply atmospheric pressure

and the pressure difference due to height is neglected. The discharge coefficient

comes from the flow modeled by that of an orifice leading to an approximated Dc of

0.53.

The lift design was based on obtaining a hovergap of ½”, which is typical for

hovercraft such as this. This gives us the total area through which air would be

escaping, as defined by:

Ahovegap L h 204in2

(3)

“The proper design pressures for a skirt require at least 20% more pressure inside the skirt than the pressure directly lifting the craft over the area of the underside. Again assuming flow through an orifice.76 in2 or have a diameter of 2.3Pcu The flowrate of air escaping through the hovergap is calculated using the general formula for flowrate: Q Ahovergap Vexit 67. so that the area of a single hole. as previously given.Where Ahovergrap is the area of the space between the ground and the hovering craft in in2. Therefore.86 and Anet is the net area of the holes in the underside of the skirt needed to produce the required flow rate in ft2. or approximately 230. the area of each hole must be 5.60 ft2.”i If these aforementioned pressures were equal.06 ft 3 s (5) Where Q is the flowrate of air in cfm. it is unlikely that the craft would hover since escaping air would not provide any lift. to ensure that the bag pressure is higher than the cushion pressure in our design: PBag (4) 1. . “C is a coefficient of flow loss” and A2<<A1 where A2 is taken as the net area: Q 2 C Anet Pbag Pcu (6)ii Where C is a typical flow loss value of 0. in in2 can be calculated as: Anet (7) Ahole N For forty total holes in the underside of the skirt. L is the perimeter in in and h is the hover gap height. The number of holes was arbitrarily chosen.71 in.40 in2. This was calculated to be Anet = 1.

Bend. 60% and 67% respectivelyiii. pg122. Wiley Publishing. James. p. Munson and Young. Bend. James.19psi.To calculate the pressure inside the hull. After performing the pressure test with a hover weight of approximately 620 pounds the estimated hull pressure was 0. OR. With these lower efficiencies the hovercraft was still able to carry a payload as high as 500 pounds in addition to its weight.27. OR. The lift system utilizes a 45 hp engine and with the calculated flowrate. With these changes in efficiency the new theoretical hull pressure was 0.com/hovercraftskirtdesignandconstructiontask iv Perozzo. ηengine is the efficiency of the lift engine. ηduct is the efficiency of the duct. They are assumed to be 60%.20. This has led us to believe that the efficiencies used in the calculations which we obtained from last year’s lift calculations were inaccurate. This shows an 84% difference between the theoretical and measured values. 2005. and ηfan is the efficiency of the lift fan.googlepages. Equation 3. Maverick Publications. Hovercrafting As a Hobby. Phull was estimated to be approximately 0. iii http://cuahovercraft2008. Further research has led us to a duct efficiency of 25%iv for a worst case scenario. v Lift Fan curve ii . Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics.62psi. Phull in psi. 1995. i Perozzo.27. Okiishi. part of the lift calculations from last year’s hovercraft was utilized: Q X* engine * duct * fan Phull (8) Where X is the power of the engine in foot pound per second. 45%v efficiency for the fan and an engine efficiency of 60% which is another estimate consistent with last year’s lift calculations. Hovercrafting As a Hobby. 1995. p. The difference is now a 16%. 5th Edition. Maverick Publications.16psi.

- Calibration Webinar March 2009Uploaded byPhạm Linh Tùng
- 2015 Lect5 Flow MeasurementUploaded byJeremy Adidya
- 129-31850Uploaded byابزار دقیق
- Orifice CalculationUploaded byLe Thuy Uyen Nha
- 1815_appb.pdfUploaded bysiamak001
- Modules16101x CurrentUploaded byPradeep Roy
- Module duaUploaded byNisa Hj Mohamad
- 12-2015-0271- Primary Elements.pdfUploaded byjuan carlos
- fmselUploaded bysar_tpgit
- Basic InstrumentUploaded byZulfequar Khan
- Liquid Flow MeasurementUploaded bymandar_sumant
- FlowUploaded byWG GZ
- RESULT,DISCUSSION,Calculation,ConclusionUploaded byHafizszul Feyzul
- Force Weight Flow MeasurementUploaded byvenkat a
- Flow Induced Vibration of a Light Circular CylinderUploaded bybanad
- On the Flow of a Compressible-Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical EngineersUploaded bymsreerajvarma
- Change Over Valve Catalog EnUploaded byMiroslav
- Hydraulics Learning ManualUploaded byJebone Stein Web Juarbal
- Wind TurbinesUploaded bymohammad
- CAT 8750_2012_EnglishUploaded byJhonDc
- Fluid Mechanics QB,(1)Uploaded bydurgeshrsharma
- Investigation and Computational Analysis of Divergent Orifice in Fuel Injector NozzleUploaded byInternational Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology
- DEVELOPMENT OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (UAV) FOR WILDLIFE SURVEILLANCEUploaded byAlee K. Obeid
- MA2003-Tutorials 7-11(1)Uploaded byCaden Lee
- june11_DLUploaded byWalter GE
- JSDEWES_0060Uploaded bybaumgartner123
- Mae 331 Lecture 3Uploaded bydamqnski
- Wings, Round Cylinders and CirculationUploaded bychirag
- COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF AIRFOIL NACA0015Uploaded byIAEME Publication
- Hydraulic Servo ValveUploaded bysaypro

- EDF ComparisonUploaded bykats2404
- کليات_ضوابط_تاسيساتUploaded bykats2404
- Combined GearboxUploaded bykats2404
- Cabin Boom Noise DampingUploaded bykats2404
- Us 5890441Uploaded bykats2404
- Computer Controlled Air Isolation SystemUploaded bykats2404
- StackEconomizer CRE-CCE Boiler BookUploaded bykats2404
- M240 MountUploaded bykats2404
- CB-8491 Heat Recovery BrochureUploaded bykats2404
- Heat ExchangersUploaded bykats2404
- F135 Engine SpecificationUploaded bykats2404
- Helio ServicesUploaded bykats2404
- Thin Gap Brochure 2015 WebUploaded bykats2404
- Us 7249732Uploaded bykats2404
- Gas Metering System-Woodward_SwiftUploaded bykats2404
- Mil Hdbk 1783bUploaded bykats2404
- Silicone MoldingUploaded bykats2404
- PropellerUploaded bykats2404
- IC 900 IC 910 Ignition ControllerUploaded bykats2404
- رنگ حرارت بالاUploaded bykats2404
- Mil Hdbk 1783b Notice 1Uploaded bykats2404
- Constant Speed PropellerUploaded bykats2404
- IC 900 IC 910 Ignition ControllerUploaded bykats2404
- راهنماي جامع توليد همزمان برق و حرارتUploaded bykats2404
- BOOSTER - EnglishUploaded bykats2404
- MT PropellersUploaded bykats2404
- Variable Pitch Constant Speed Propellers for Light AircraftUploaded bykats2404
- ميكروتوربين هاي گازيUploaded bykats2404
- Besander TD English 02Uploaded bykats2404