Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
The aim is to discuss the formulations for
the double-hardening models in PLAXIS:
Hardening Soil Model
HSsmall (small strain stiffness model)
Introduction
The topics to be covered include:
Hardening Soil model in the context of
constitutive models
Hardening Soil model formulation
Limitations of HS model
Small strain stiffness
HSsmall model formulation
Limitations of HSsmall model
Parameter selection for HS models
linear elastic
'0
G
1
max
elastic
yield surface
elastic
Stress-Strain Curve
p,
Model characteristics:
Hyperbolic stress-strain relationship in axial compression
Plastic strain in mobilizing friction (shear hardening)
Plastic strain in primary compression (volumetric hardening)
Stress-dependent stiffness according to a power law
Elastic unloading/ reloading compared to virgin loading
Memory of pre-consolidation stress
Mohr-Coulomb (MC) failure criterion
Dilatancy below MC line
Small strain stiffness (HS-small only)
where
and
1 = 50
qf =
qa =
q
qa q
2sin
( 3' + c cot )
1 sin
qf
Rf
qf
q
q
q
asymptote
a
1
E
50
qf
ur
1
1
The hyperbolic model with Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion constitutes the basis for
the HS and HS-small models. In contrast to the Duncan-Chang model, the HS
models are elasto-plastic models.
Shear hardening
s
Yield function (cone): f =
qa q
2q
ps
E50 qa q Eur
Elastic
MC failure line
q
plastic
Increasing
plastic
shear
strains
-a = c cot
Evolution law for ps: d ps = d s where ds is the plastic multiplier for the
cone type yield surface of the model.
q% 2
p '2 p p 2
K0
cap
pp
c
Volumetric or
vertical strain,
1
pp
Therefore: q% = f ( 1 , 2 , 3 , )
m
K s Kc 3 + a
p
Evolution law: dp p =
d v
K s K c p ref + a
Eurref
where K s =
and the bulk stiffness of the cap Kc is determined
3(1 2 )
from Eoed and K0nc
asymptote: qa
E50
qf=0,9 qa
y
c
y
Eoed
'+ a
E50 = E50ref 3
pa '+ a
(Secant modulus)
+a
ref '3 / K
Eoed = Eoed
'
+
p
a
a
nc
0
(Tangent modulus)
Unloading, reloading
by:
E50
1
Eur >E50
1
Eur = Eurref (
y
c
3 '+a
pa '+ a
)m
ur = low value
Eoed
1
Kur =
Eur
3(12ur)
Shear modulus
Gur =
Eur
2(1+ur)
Oedometer
Eoed =
ur
Eur(1ur)
(12ur)(1+ur)
d
e
p
t
h
c
y0
y0 c
Preconsolidation is entered by
OCR or POP relative to initial
vertical stress and is then
converted to pp.
Initial
CAP
POP
y0
1
ur
1 ur
ur
Default:
Current
stress
K '0 = 1 sin
K0
x0
xx
ur
Initial stresses:
q
MC failure line
Output:
K0nc line
pc
p eq =
Cap
p0, q0
peq0
pc,0
( p' )
pc
= eq
p
+ q2 / 2
Dilatancy
~ e max
2sin
1-sin
y
v
sin cv =
sin m =
'1 '3
'1 + '3 2c' cot '
sin m =
sin m sin cv
1 sin m sin cv
Dilatancy formulation:
Rowe (1962) modified
input
Stress
state
cv
-a
HS input parameters
Parameter
Description
E50ref
Eoedref
Eurref
ur
POP: (p vo)
OCR: p/vo
Konc = 1 sin
Monotonic
loading
Retaining walls
Foundations
Tunnels
Very
small
strains
Small strains
Larger strains
0
-6
10
-5
10
-4
10
-3
10
Dynamic methods
Local gauges
-2
10
-1
10
Limitation: Unloading/reloading
stiffness is the same
q=1-3 [kPa]
1 [%]
Truly elastic behaviour on for very small loops
At small strains stiffness increases
Hysteresis increases with increasing strains
OC clay
HSmodel
p
Use previous experience from lab, field and case records for
strength and stiffness (E50 etc)
p' [kN/m2]
1000
M-C
800
600
400
200
Illustration by Brinkgreve, R.B.J.
0
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
eps-v
0.04
0.05
150
100
50
Illustration by Brinkgreve, R.B.J.
0
0
0.02
0.04
eps-1
0.06
0.08
eps-v
9.00E-03
6.00E-03
M-C
3.00E-03
0.000
H-S
-3.00E-03
-6.00E-03
0
0.02
0.04
eps-1
0.06
0.08
800
600
M-C
400
H-S
200
Illustration by Brinkgreve, R.B.J.
0
0
0.005
0.010
0.015
eps-1
0.020
0.025
0.030
MC
Introduction
The aim is to discuss the extension of the
HS model to account for small strain
stiffness.
The topics to be covered include:
Small strain stiffness
HSsmall model formulation
Limitations of HSsmall model
1 [%]
Truly elastic behaviour on for very small loops
At small strains stiffness increases
Hysteresis increases with increasing strains
1 [%]
E0 = 2 (1 + ur) G0
q = 1-3
G = q/
G0
Gur
q
= 1-3
normal -axis
scaled -axis
= 1-3
Retaining walls
Foundations
Tunnels
Very
small
strains
Small strains
Larger strains
0
-6
10
-5
10
-4
10
-3
10
Dynamic methods
Local gauges
-2
10
-1
10
250
E0 = Eref
0
with E
*
ref
0
p'
pref
140 MPa
=
e
p'
G0 = G
pref
k
with Gref
0 = function (e ) OCR
ref
0
200
Kim et al.
150
Kokusho et al.
Sand &
Gravel
100
Kenya
sand
Clay
50
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
E dynamic
E
0
E static
Eur
* H.B. Seed, I.M. Idriss, Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analysis. Report 70-10,
EERC (Berkeley, Cali-fornia), 1970.
** M. Vucetic, R. Dobry, Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,
ASCE 117 (1991), no. 1, 89-107.
0.7 = 0.00015
p'
pref
IP = 30:
0.7 = 0.00026
p'
pref
p'
pref
Note: The indicated stress dependency of 0.7 is not implemented in the commercial HSS
model. If needed, the stress dependency of 0.7 can be incorporated into boundary value
problems through definition of sub-layers.
*Darendeli,
Mehmet Baris, Development of a New Family of Normalized Modulus Reduction and Material
Damping Curves. PhD Dissertation (supervisor: Prof. Kenneth H. Stokoe, II), Department of Civil
Engineering. The University of Texas at Austin. August, 2001.
HS-Small model
1.0
G/G0 [-]
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
-3
1e
-2
-1
1e
1e
1e
1e
1e
Normalisierte Scherdehnung /0.7 [-]
1e
G0
1 + 0.385 / 0.7
Gt =
Gur
G0
(1 + 0.385 / 0.7 )2
Gur
G starts again at G0
after full strain reversal
Cyclic loading
leads to Hysteresis
Gt
G0
Gs
-c
+c
G0
CiTG, Geo-engineering,
http://geo.citg.tudelft.nl
G0
Energy dissipation
Damping
G0
Gt
Gs
Gur
G0
f
G
1
=
G0
1+ / r
Modified HS-Small:
G
1
=
G0
1 + (3 ) /(7 0.7 )
Note: r in the original approach by Hardin
& Drnevich relates to the failure shear
stress f.
B.O. Hardin, V.P. Drnevich, Shear modulus and damping in soils: Design equations and curves,
ASCE Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division 98 (1972), no. SM7, 667-692.
G0ref
40000
Tangent modulus G [kN/m]
40000
0.7
30000
20000
10000
HS-Small
30000
20000
Gurref
10000
1E-5
0.0001
Shear strain [-]
0.001
0.01
1E-5
0.0001
Shear strain [-]
0.001
0.01
1/3
GSecant [kN/m2]
Vol[-]
-0.20
-0.16
160000
HS (original)
120000
HS-Small
-0.12
2
-0.08
-0.04
0
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
1[-]
Experiment
80000
40000
0
0.0001
0.001
0.01
1-3[-]
Excavation example
Distance to wall [m]
20
40
60
80
0
-0.004
-0.008
-0.012
MC (E50)
MC (Eur)
-0.016
Settlement [m]
A comparison:
MC (E50): MC calculation with E = E50
MC (Eur): MC calculation with E = Eur
HS: HS calculation with Eoed = E50
HSS: Same as HS but with small
strain stiffness
20
40
60
80
0
-0.004
-0.008
-0.012
HS
HSS
-0.016
Settlement [m]
Excavation example
Limburg excavation: Horizontal wall displacement
MC-Model (E50)
-0.04 -0.03 -0.02 -0.01
MC Model (Eur)
0
-5
-5
-5
-5
-10
-10
-10
-10
-15
-15
-15
-15
-20
-20
-20
-20
-25
-25
-25
-25
Excavation example
Limburg excavation: Bending moments in [kNm/m]
MC-Model (E50)
-600 -400 -200
200 400
MC Model (Eur)
-600 -400 -200
200 400
200 400
200 400
-5
-5
-5
-5
-10
-10
-10
-10
-15
-15
-15
-15
-20
-20
-20
-20
-25
-25
-25
-25
Tunnel example
Steinhaldenfeld - NATM
10
20
30
-0.01
Measurement
-0.02
HS (original)
HS-Small
Settlement [m]
40
HS-Small model
1.0
G/G0 [-]
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
-3
1e
-2
-1
1e
1e
1e
1e
1e
Normalisierte Scherdehnung /0.7 [-]
1e
HS model (HSsmall)
Relevance of small-strain stiffness:
Very stiff behaviour at very small strains (vibrations)
Reduction of stiffness with increasing strain; restart after
load reversal
Hysteresis in cyclic loading:
Energy dissipation
Damping
Friction angle
Dilatancy angle
Rf
Failure ratio qf /qa like in Duncan-Chang model (0.9)
K0nc
Stress ratio xx/yy in 1D primary compression
Selected references
Brinkgreve, R.B.J. et al (20xx): Users manual for
PLAXIS 2D.
Schanz,T. Vermeer, P.A., Bonnier P.G. (1999):
The Hardening Soil Model: Formulation and
verification, Beyond 2000 in Computational
Geotechnics 10 years of PLAXIS, Balkema.
Benz, T: Small-Strain Stiffness of Soils and its
Numerical Consequences, PhD Thesis. IGS,
Universitt Stuttgart, Mitteilung 55.
3.0
20
G m [-]
40
60
2.0
Gm=Gref /Gurref
80
1.0
100
-20
20
40
60
80
100
120
The dark (blue) area is the strain area where G = Gur. The light gray
(yellow) area is the very-small-strain area with G G0. In between Gur
and G0 is the area where shear strains are small but not very small
according to the definition by Atkinson.
q (kPa)
140
120
100
100 kPa Stress Path
80
60
40
20
0
0
50
100
150
P` (kPa)
200
250
Care needs to be taken when the geologic loading history of a soil is modeled.
If, for example, a vertical surcharge was applied and removed in order to model
OCR, the model remembers the vertical heave upon unloading including its
decreased small-strain stiffness. The initial stiffness at the onset of loading the
footing might then look as the one shown at the left-hand side of the above
figure. Here, the material should be exchanged or a reverse load step applied.
Based on materials by
Dennis Waterman
Plaxis bv
Prof. Steinar Nordal - NTNU Norwegian University of
Science and Technology
Nubia Gonzlez UPC Universidad Politcnica de Catalua
Description
E50ref
Eoedref
Eurref
m
ur = 0.2
c
G0ref
0.7
E50 = E50ref
Eoed
3 '+ a
p
+
a
ref
'1 + a
ref
= Eoed
p
+
a
ref
Eur = Eurref
3 '+ a
p
+
a
ref
a = ccot()
m
q
qult
(, c)
3=pref
E50ref
Eurref
c 1=pref
qf=Rf qult
0.5 qf
Triaxial test
1
Eoedref
Oedometer test
Stiffness of Sand
Schanz (1998)
E50
E50
y
x
y - x E
50
y - x
Test 1:
x= 50kPa
E50
Test 2:
x= 100kPa
E50 = E50ref
ref
50
Test 3:
x= 200kPa
'x
pref
y
Laboratory experience: y dependency of Eoed
ref
E oed = E oed
'y
p ref
ref
Loose sands: Eoed 15 MPa
ref
Dense sands: Eoed 50 MPa
Stiffness of sand
ref
50
E E
ref
oed
ref
Eoed
RD 60MPa
emax e
RD =
emax emin
Correlation by Lengkeek
for pref=100 kPa
Stiffness of sand
ref
E50ref Eoed
p ref
-1= p ref
-3 = p ref
-3
-1
Eoed
Cone tip
Soil type
of sand
resistance
at v = v0 Stiffness
Eoed = 4qc
qc < 10 MPa
Loose sands:
Eoed = 2qc+20
10 MPa < qc < 50 Unaged and
MPa
MPa
uncemented,
predominantly
Eoed = 120 MPa
qc > 50 MPa
silica
Eoed = 5qc
qc < 50 MPa
Dense sands
Eoed = 250 MPa
qc > 50 MPa
Triaxial tests:
Unloading is purely
elastic in HS model
(1ur )
Eur,oed =
Eur 1.1 Eur
(12ur )(1+ur )
Triaxial test
Alternatively:
ref
ur
3 '+ a
1 '+ a
ref
= Eoed
pref '+ a
pref '+ a
m
Eurref
m
ref 1 ' + a
ref
= Eoed
=
E
/
K
(
)
0
oed
'
+
a
3
Sand (m=0.5):
Eur ,oed 3Eoed
ref
ref
Eurref 3Eoed
/ K0 4Eoed
EXAMPLE:
Triaxial test results by Shaoli (2004)
Dense Hokksund sand at 40 kPa,
n = 35,9% (initial) 39,6% (end of test)
D e v ia t o r ic s t r e s s , q [ k P a ]
dense 40
200
150
dense 40
100
50
E50ref = E50
0
0
pref + a
'x + a
= 20000kPa
100kPa
= 32MPa
40kPa
EXAMPLE
Triaxial test results by Shaoli (2004)
Dense Hokksund sand at 40 kPa,
n = 35,9% (initial) 39,6% (end of test)
Dense 40
-4
1-sin
-3
2sin
-2
-1
Dense 40
1 sin
1
5
=
= 1,2
2 sin
4,2
sin = 0,29
0
1
= 17
EXAMPLE
Oedometer test dense Hokksund sand, n = 39% , (Moen, 1975)
0
Loading:
-0,2
Test data
-0,4
ref
Eoed = Eoed
-0,6
-0,8
ref
Eoed
= Eoed
-1
-1,2
-1,4
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Unloading:
1 '+ a
pa '+ a
pa ''+
+a
1 '+ a
850kPa 100kPa
0,008 400kPa
= 53MPa
=
3 '+ a
pa '+ a
pa '+ a
850kPa 100
= 0.9
= 195MPa
3 '+ a
0,0028 200
HS Material parameters
for dense Hokksund sand from fitting PLAXIS
results to experimental data
(after trial and error, starting with estimated parameters):
=0
Axial
symmetry
pw = 0
Plaxis 40
dense 40
60
40
20
0
0,00
1,00
2,00
3,00
4,00
5,00
-4
-3,5
-3
-2,5
-2
from PLAXIS 40
Dense 40
-1,5
-1
-0,50,00
0
0,5
1
1,00
2,00
3,00
4,00
5,00
Test data
-0,2
Plaxis
-0,4
-0,6
-0,8
-1
-1,2
-1,4
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Stiffness of Clay
Stiffness of clay
Drained stiffness from oedometer tests
y
Basically
'y
ref
Eoed = Eoed
p
ref
y
Eoed
Eoed
ref
oed
1
=
mv
Eoed = E
ref
oed
for
ref
oed
'y
p
ref
Soft NC clays:
pref = 100kPa
pref = y '
1 MPa
Stiffness of clay
Ideal: drained triaxial test or consolidated undrained
triaxial test
Practice: undrained triaxial test
y - x
E50 = f Eu50
Eu50
1
1+
1+ u
cu: undrained
shear strength
f =
cu
f = 1/ 3
0.25 < f < 0.35
1 '+ a
m
ref
E = E
= Eoed / ( K0 )
3 '+ a
ref
ur
ref
oed
Clay (m=1):
ref
ref
/ K0 20Eoed
NC : Eur ,oed 10Eoed Eurref 10Eoed
ref
ref
OC : Eur ,oed 3Eoed Eurref 3Eoed
/ K0 3Eoed
Stiffness of clay
Other estimations for stiffness of normally consolidated clays (m=1):
ref
oed
1
2
E E
ref
50
ref
oed
50000 kPa
Ip
ref
oed
500 kPa
wL 0.1
Correlation by Vermeer
ref
oed
Oedometer modulus
Stiffness of
clay
5
MP
a
4
ref
Eoed
= 230 (
0
Based on Janbu (1963)
1 + e0
)
Cc
Stiffness of sand
and clay
After Janbu (1963)
Janbu :
Eoed
ref
= Eoed
pref
more general:
+ a
Eoed = Eref
oed
pref + a
with a = c cot
105
rock
104
103
sandy gravel
102
sand
10
Norwegian
clays
50
porosity
porosityn n[%][%]
100
Stiffness of clay
1
2
ref
E50
ref
Eoed
50000 kPa
Ip
ref
Eoed
500 kPa
wL 0.1
Correlation by Vermeer
ref
Eoed
= p ref *
10 m
xx
= 20kN/m3
Sample
pw yy
pw xx
5m
Soft clay by
Hardening soil
model:
ref
E 50
= 2 MPa
m=1
= 25o
ref
E oed
= 2 MPa
ur = 0,2
= 0o
E urref = 10 MPa
c = 5 kPa
K0NC = 0.577
Note the
preconsolidaton
levels at:
OCR = 3
-0,02
-0,04
yy
OCR = 1,5
-0,06
yy = 150 kPa
yy = 300 kPa
-0,08
-0,10
0
yy
Stress [kN/m2]
-200
-400
-600
0
-74
ur
OCR = 1,5
-123
xx-200
-300
ur
OCR = 3
Konc
11
-400
yy
ref
E 50
= 2 MPa
pw = 0
ref
E oed
= 2 MPa
Axial
symmetry
ref
E ur
= 10 MPa
m=1
ur = 0,2
c = 5 kPa
= 25o
= 0o
K0NC = 0.577
Stress
paths:
q [kN/m2]
200
200
160
160
120
120
80
80
40
40
Initial cap
OCR = 1
OCR = 2
0
0
0
-40
-80
-120
-160
-50
160
140
Effect of
OCR:
-150
p [kN/m2]
p' [kN/m2]
180
-100
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
-20 0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
yy
-200
-250
Parameter limitations
HS model has internal parameters that are computed from our
engineering input parameters.
pc
E50
Eur
E oed
double hardening
p
E50 / Eoed > 2 difficult to input
G starts again at G0
after full strain reversal
Gur
ref
0
G0 = G
c cos 3 sin
c cos + p ref sin
Cyclic loading
leads to Hysteresis
Gt
G0
Energy dissipation
Damping
Gs
-c
+c
G0
Gs =
G0
1 + 0.385
G0
Gt =
0.7
G0
1 + 0.385
0.7
HSsmall
q [kN/m]
120
E0
ref
E
0
G0ref =
2(1+ur )
HS
100
80
60
40
20
0 0
Et Eur
-0.002
-0.004
-0.006
-0.008
yy
-0.01
-0.012
-0.014
G0ref
(2.97 e)2
=
33 [MPa]
1+ e
RD 70MPa + 60MPa
0.7 =
0.385
[2c(1 + cos(2 )) 1(1 + K0 )sin(2 )]
4G0
Benz (2007)
Order of magnitude:
0.7 = (1 to 2) 10 4
where
ref
ur
Eurref
=
2(1 + ur )
Use previous experience from lab, field and case records for
strength and stiffness (E50 etc)
HS / HSsmall
Unloading +
deviatoric load
(excavation)
Deviatoric
loading
HS / HSsmall
HS / HSsmall
HS / HSsmall
Secondary
compression
n/a