11 views

Uploaded by prashant94

Keplars laws

- NASA Facts Space Navigation
- GRE Questions With Solns
- Arabs Real Time Physics
- Mechanism of the HeavensB
- Biomechanics of Airborne and Arm-Supported Activities
- Dinamic Satellite Geodesy
- space flight mechanics
- Upgrade Your Physics
- 1st Year Physics Important Mcqs for the Exam 2013
- 3.6
- 9.Gravitation.pdf
- Formula Sheet physics
- A Synopsis of the Discoveries of John w. Keely - Jerry Decker
- College Physics EOC Questions Chapter 8
- Topic 10 Problem Set 2016
- Gravitation
- 2012 james ruse phys.pdf
- Circular Motion, Orbits, And Gravity
- satellite ques bank.doc
- Les coordonnées cylindriques sont _

You are on page 1of 10

1970s initially presumed that spiral galaxies were standard orbital systems, just like the Solar

system, and that the laws of planetary motion should apply. As a result, when the rotational

velocities of disk objects were found to be generally flat at all peripheral radii, conflicting with

characteristic Keplerian rotation curves, it was concluded that either classical mechanics had been

falsified at large scales, or that some enormous, undetected form of matter must be present to

extend the distribution of galactic mass to very large radii. The procedural assessment conducted

here shows that very large scale aggregations of massive objects cannot be expected to rotate like

the highly centralized mass of the Solar system. Newton proved long ago that Keplerian relations

specifically apply only to the mass distribution inherent in the Solar system. As a result, no galactic

dark matter need be inferred from any discrepancy with Keplerian rotation curves.

planets. However, they provide no explanation of why the planets

move in this way. Moreover, Kepler's Third Law only works for

planets around the Sun and does not apply to the Moon's orbit

around the Earth or the moons of Jupiter. Isaac Newton (16421727) provided a more general explanation of the motions of the

planets through the development of Newton's Laws of

Motion and Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation.

a planet from the Sun (called its semi-major axis, A, measured in Astronomical

Units) and the amount of time it takes a planet to orbit the Sun once (called its

orbital period, P, measured in years). For objects orbiting the Sun, the semi-major

axis to the third power equals the period squared:

A3 = P 2

There were two problems with this relation. First, Kepler did not know how it

worked, he just knew it did. Second, the relation does not work for objects which

are not orbiting the Sun, for example, the Moon orbiting the Earth. Isaac Newton

solved both these problems with his Theory of Gravity, and discovered that the

masses of the orbiting bodies also play a part. Newton developed a more general

form of what was called Kepler's Third Law that could apply to any two objects

orbiting a common center of mass. This is called Newton's Version of Kepler's

Third Law:

M1 + M2 = A3 / P2

Special units must be used to make this equation work. If the data are not given in

the proper units, they must be converted.

The masses must be measured in solar masses, where one solar mass is 1.99 X

1033 grams, or 1.99 X 1030 kilograms.

The semi-major axis must be measured in Astronomical Units, where 1 AU is

149,600,000 kilometers, or 93,000,000 miles.

The orbital period must be measured in years, where 1 year is 365.25 days.

This relation has many uses: determining the mass of a planet by looking at its

moon(s), studying binary star systems, even determining the mass of the Galaxy!

There is a problem, however, with the way the equation is written above. Often, we

are not able to determine to a high degree of accuracy the average distance

between, say, two binary stars. We must use a modified version of NVK3L for very

distant objects.

To achieve this modification, we must first introduce an equation for velocity, how

fast an object is traveling. Everybody who has driven a car has encountered the

formula for velocity. The speedometer on a car measures velocity in miles per

hour, or kilometers per hour. Now miles or kilometers are ways of

measuring distance, hours are what we use to measure time, and "per" is a word

signaling division. Therefore, the formula for velocity is

How does this relate to NVK3L? Remember that our real problem is often that we

do not know the average distance between the two objects that are orbiting each

other. Many times, we can only clearly see one of the objects that is orbiting! But

velocity is something we can measure, as long as we can see one of the partners,

using the Doppler Effect.

Technically what we are measuring is the orbital velocity of the visible partner,

which can be related to the distance traveled by the visible partner in its orbit and

the time it takes the visible partner to orbit once. That time is simply the orbital

period P, which is generally easy to observe. What we usually don't know is the

distance traveled around the orbit by the visible partner, called

distance, A, by the formula

Circumference = C = 2 (pi) A

So the velocity equation becomes

Velocity = V = C / P = 2 (pi) A / P

Remember that we can compute velocity using the Doppler Effect. We can

observe the orbital period easily. It is the value of A that is typically very hard to

find. So we turn the equation above around, and solve for A:

A = V P / 2 (pi)

We can now take this value of A and plug it in to Newton's Version of Kepler's

Third Law to get an equation involving knowable things, like V and P:

M1 + M2 = V3P3 / 23(pi)3P2

M1 + M2 = V3P / 8(pi)3

What this equation is basically telling us is, the more mass there is in a system, the

faster the components of that system are moving as they orbit each other. We shall

not use this more complicated version of NVK3L for homework calculations, but

we will use the concept in our discussion of black holes.

". . . equal diurnal arcs on one and the same eccentric are not traversed with

equal velocities, but that these different times in equal parts of the eccentric

are to each other as the distances from the Sun, the source of the motion; and

on the other hand, that the times being supposed equal, as, for instance, one

natural day in each case, the true diurnal arcs corresponding to them in a

single eccentric orbit are inversely proportional to the two distances from the

Sun. It has likewise been shown be me that the orbit of a planet is elliptical,

and the Sun, the source of motion, is in one of the foci of this ellipse."

Jon-Richfield says:

Reply I am not sure what baffles you about that, because there is only one place where the other focus can be (except

where the elliptical orbit of the planet happens to be a circle --namely where the two foci are in the same place).

That other place for the other (eccentric) focus is ... not at the centre of the body round which the planet is

orbiting. The eccentric focus might be off-centre within the sun, or if the orbit is really very eccentric, the eccentric

focus will be out in space away from the sun. Comets in elliptical orbit have such foci for example.

To draw yourself such a picture, draw an ellipse, showing the foci, and draw the sun round one focus. There you

have it!

Now, possibly you are bothered, because at one end of the orbit you have the planet scooting along an orbit

around a massive sun that holds it on course, and at the other end it follows exactly the same orbit round...

nothing???

Yes, sort of, but... there is another difference, isn't there? Speed!

Suppose you drop a satellite towards a distant primary, such as perhaps a star 150000000 km away, giving it just

enough sideways momentum to prevent it hitting the sun. It will fall first very slowly, then faster and faster as it

approaches the sun, but it will not pick up more momentum than the sun's gravity had contributed by pulling it

downwards (never mind Einstein at this point; it doesn't really affect us much.) This means that even when it is

travelling at nearly its fastest as it passes the sun, the sun doesn't let it escape, but pulls it round and swings it

back.

Because the sun now pulls back on the planet exactly as hard as it had been pulling it nearer, the planet slows

down exactly as quickly as it had speeded up and it necessarily follows an outward path exactly symmetrical with

its inward path. To be sure there is no gravitational mass at the other focus, but there does not need to be; when

the planet is near the empty, eccentric focus it is travelling at its slowest. The distant mass of the sun is adequate

to deal with its now small momentum.

For the 3rd law, assume a planet is in a circular orbit. This is because the perimeter of an ellipse is

extremely difficult to calculate, and the eccentricities of the elliptical orbits are small anyway.

The gravitational attractive force exerted on the planet by the Sun is given by the Newtonian formula F

= GMm/d where G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the Sun, m is the mass of the planet

and d is the Sun-to-planet distance.

The centripetal force needed to hold the planet in orbit is given by the expression F = mv/d where v is

the orbital velocity.

These two forces are the same.

hence GM/d = v (eliminating m/d from both sides).

Now v, the orbital velocity, is given by 2d/p where p is the period of the planet.

Hence GM/d = 4d/p

and GM = 4d/p

Rearranging we have p/d = 4/GM

Since 4/GM is a constant we have Kepler's 3rd Law - the ratio of the square of the period of a

planet to the cube of its distance from the Sun is a constant.

Mar 27 10, 2:25 PM

derive Kepler's second law from Newton's laws.

The first, presented by Newton in 1684, is a

geometrical method and is shown in Figure 36.

figure 36:

on by a gravitational force as a succession of

small kicks or impulses which in the limit become

a continuously applied influence. Newton

imagined an object travelling along part of an

orbit AB which then receives an impulse directed

towards the point S. As a result, it then travels

along the line BC instead of Bc. Similar impulses

carry it to D, E andF. Newton visalized the

displacement BC as being, in effect, the

combination of the displacement Bc, equal to AB,

that the object would have undergone if it had

continued for an equal length of time with its

original velocity, together with the

displacement cCparallel to the line BS along

yields Kepler's second law by a simple argument:

The triangles SAB and SBc are equal, having

equal bases (AB and Bc) and the same altitude.

The triangles SBc and SBC are equal, having a

common base (SB) and lying between the same

parallels. Hence triangle SAB = triangle SBC.

A modern Newtonian derivation of Kepler's

second law requires the concept of an orbiting

body's angular momentum

L = r X p = m (r X v)

where m is the body's mass, r is its position

vector and p its linear momentum (= mv,

where v is its velocity). Note that for the first

time in this course we distinguish between vector

quantities and scalar quantities by writing vector

quantities in a bold face. The vector cross

product (denoted by X) is an operation that

yields the product of the perpendicular

components of two vectors; hence ifr and p are

parallel, then r X p = 0. Angular momentum is a

vector quantity L with the units kgm s .

Differentiating L, we have

2

-1

=rXF

since v is parallel to p and dp/dt is the definition

of force according to Newton's second law. We

call dL/dt the torque (with units kgm s ) and see

that when F and r are co-linear, due to a central

force such as gravitation, the torque vanishes.

Hence L is constant in time and so angular

momentum is conserved for all central forces.

The conservation of angular momentum is a very

powerful tool in celestial mechanics and can be

used to derive Kepler's second law as follows.

2

-2

orbit.

velocity v at a distance r from the

focus F (Figure 37). During a short time

interval t, the body moves from P to Q and the

radius vector sweeps through the angle

. This

small angle is approximately given by

=v

t / r, where v is the component

of v perpendicular to r. During this time, the

radius vector has swept out the triangle FPQ, the

area of which is approximately given by A = rv

t / 2. Therefore, in the limit given by

t approaching zero, we have

t

dA/dt = rv /2 = r (d /dt).

2

in Figure 37 is given by the vector perpendicular

to the plane defined by r and v, i.e. it is out of

the plane of the paper. The scalar magnitude

of L is given by

L = mv r= mr d /dt.

t

given by

2

constant, i.e. the rate of sweeping out area is a

constant. Hence we have verified Kepler's second

law.

- NASA Facts Space NavigationUploaded byBob Andrepont
- GRE Questions With SolnsUploaded byAnonymous EgKRey
- Arabs Real Time PhysicsUploaded byJoe Nahhas
- Mechanism of the HeavensBUploaded byMadhav Gumma
- Biomechanics of Airborne and Arm-Supported ActivitiesUploaded byOnwaree Ing
- Dinamic Satellite GeodesyUploaded byJose Valverde
- space flight mechanicsUploaded bytanmaysinghalver
- Upgrade Your PhysicsUploaded byHassaan Ahmad
- 1st Year Physics Important Mcqs for the Exam 2013Uploaded byShafique Rahman
- 3.6Uploaded byDewi Cahya Fitri
- 9.Gravitation.pdfUploaded bysrkadali
- Formula Sheet physicsUploaded byTaco Christopher
- A Synopsis of the Discoveries of John w. Keely - Jerry DeckerUploaded byGregg Martin
- College Physics EOC Questions Chapter 8Uploaded bySri R
- Topic 10 Problem Set 2016Uploaded byPaul Amezquita
- GravitationUploaded byVenu Gopal
- 2012 james ruse phys.pdfUploaded byWilliam Hou
- Circular Motion, Orbits, And GravityUploaded bygundul pacul
- satellite ques bank.docUploaded byNeeraja Selvaraj
- Les coordonnées cylindriques sont _Uploaded byJj Mevel
- Question Paper June 2005 Unit-5Uploaded byMuhammad Umer Zaid
- Chapter+3Uploaded byEdgar Figueroa
- 2012_Physics_-_James_Ruse_Trial_with_Solutions.pdfUploaded byWilliam Hou
- Asteroid Impact and Eccentricity of Earth’s OrbitUploaded bySergioLeonardoGonzálezFonseca
- The Size and Structure of the Universe (Ok)Uploaded bybarahir
- Co 1653 Satellite CommunicationUploaded byArjanee Mohammad Yusuf
- 1304.6867.pdfUploaded byjacobomr1980
- science toys activityUploaded byapi-303403797
- Mechanics L8Uploaded byCharlie Lai
- p6Uploaded byRap Beltran

- Constant AccelerationUploaded byphultushibls
- 14 Momentum ImpulseUploaded byeltytan
- Pahang Stpm 2013Uploaded byCheng WL
- CLS Aipmt 15 16 XIII Phy Study Package 1 Set 1 Chapter 3Uploaded bydivyashishtomar
- Demo Lesson Plan FREE FALLUploaded byBenzene Robi
- DERIVATION OF RECTILINEAR MOTION AND ITS APPLICATIONUploaded bycontactmahtab786
- AD0685775.pdfUploaded byManju Barathi
- List of Definition of SPM Physics NewUploaded byTan Sri Logez Dev
- g481 1 1 2 scalars and vectorsUploaded byapi-236179294
- Derivation of the Lorentz transformationUploaded byBernard SCHAEFFER
- Dynamic determination of pile capacity.docxUploaded byRozyFHarnas
- Lec 3.1 Kinematics of ParticleUploaded bykm3197
- Olympiad Physics INPHO Solved Question Paper 2009Uploaded byRam
- Benford and Wassermann (1939a) - Mechanism of Addition to Double Bonds VI - Kinetics of Gaseous AssociationsUploaded bybltzkrig
- Official Notice of Bihar Police Constable & Fireman Syllabus 2018Uploaded byShrishanti Kale
- yearly lesson plan physics form 4Uploaded byfordal
- Projectile Multiple ChoiceUploaded byIsrael Lives
- Geas ReviewerUploaded byangelo_lopez1993
- biomekanikUploaded byRicaariani MyGeisha Smashblast
- physics 2012-13 CurriculumUploaded byFaisalShafique
- Modeling the Jump of a SnowboardUploaded byEwout Kessels
- CM Tutorial questions 2018.pdfUploaded byKhalifa Khalid
- PhysicsUploaded byjoanthanbiederman
- Calculation of Wind Peak Velocity Pressure - Eurocode 1Uploaded byBerat Hasolli
- BoundaryConditions_of41Uploaded byMarco Bernardes
- ProblemsUploaded bySilokshan Balasingam
- The Alpha - Beta - Gamma FilterUploaded bySamuele Tesfaye
- rocket lab reportUploaded byapi-254748115
- Polyflow BMTF WS03 Plug AssistedUploaded bywoongs73
- Kinematics of PantographUploaded byFa Veliz