You are on page 1of 4

________

No. 14- 9396


_________
IN THE

Supreme Court of the United States


___________
Cody Robert Judy,
Petitioner,
v.
Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro et.al.,
Respondent(s)
On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court
For the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals
________
MOTION /APPLICATION FOR TIME EXTENSION FOR PETITIONER TO COMPLY
JUSTICE SOTOMAYER FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
________
Comes now the Petitioner before the Court, pro se, and respectfully submits,
pursuant to Rule 21 of the Rules of the Supreme Court this MOTION/APPLICATION
FOR TIME EXTENSION FOR PETITIONER TO COMPLY. The Brief Main Points in
consideration for the Extension of Time to be granted are as follows:
1- Petitioners Writ of Certiorari is docketed March 30 th,2015 along with his
motion to proceed forma pauperis.
2- Petitioners Original Conference was scheduled June 18 th,2015, clearly 78
days after the Case was noticed as docketed.
3- The Court denied forma pauperis on June 18 th giving petitioner until July 13th
to comply in paying the docketing fee required by 38 (a) and to submit a
petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the rules of the Court. The Courts
Denial was not made pursuant to Rule 39.8 in Ref. Demos,[502 U.S. 16,21
(1991)(91-5052)]
1

4- On June 24th as noticed on the docket, Petitioner submitted a MOTION FOR


RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS with Exhibits of up-to-date bank statements/accounts of both the
Presidential Campaign and his Personal Account showing a deterioration of
funds and a slow/down time for Petitioners Employment, giving the Court a
full (7) days/week before its Summer Recess to consider it.
5- On June 29th the Released Orders List did not provide any ruling on that
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS.
6- On June 30th Petitioner called the Court Clerk asking [w]hen his MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS would be address by the Court. The Clerk notified Petitioner the
Court does not consider forma pauperis Motions during its recess until
October 1st.
7- Noticing the July 13th, 2015 date that the Court will dismiss the Petitioners
Writ of Certiorari, the petitioner not having any means to comply financially,
and the June 24th MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND REVIEW OF ORDER
DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS as evidence of that, the
Petitioner request the Court for a 30 Day Extension after the Courts ruling on
the MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND REVIEW OF ORDER DENYING LEAVE
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS.
8- Petitioner would also request that because the MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION AND REVIEW OF ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS is not an ORIGINAL; the Court does Rule on Motions of
Active Cases during its Summer Recess- the Action of Dismissing the Case
proceeding July 13th being a clear indication of action/activity if this MOTION
FOR EXTENTION OF TIME is not Granted, that his MOTION FOR REVIEW OF
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS be Granted along
with Writ of Certiorari, so that the 3 month Recess can be used for the Briefs
to be filed by both Parties, rather than harmful delay.
9- DELAY is detrimental for Petitioner as well as Respondent(s) due in part to the
Presidential Election in 2016. Fully six months exist before the Iowa Caucus
in January 2016. This case revolves around an interpretation of natural born
Citizen in U.S.C. Art. II, Sect. 1, Clause 5. , that the Republicans U.S. Senator
Ted Cruz, U.S. Senator Bobby Jindal, and U.S. Senator Marco Rubio are in
effect in violation of as Candidates for President with no timely recourse or
due process available. Without a ruling by the SUPREME COURT, Campaign
donations as well as confusion exist among the VOTING PUBLIC. This is

siphoning off important support to the Petitioner in contributions necessarily


going to unqualified Candidates.
10-Attending this PRINCIPLE of the U.S. Constitution is vital to the 46% of
Americas Voters who are in fact now Independent Voters according to a
January 2015 Gallup Poll . The Court avoiding the Issue does not serve them
as it affects the race among republicans and democrats and we all look for
guidance on the interpretation of the Constitutions demanding standards for
the Office of the President being different than the Citizen standard for
Senators and Representatives.
Petitioner then prays that this Motion will be granted in the considerations of
the necessity requiring a decision before July 13 th, 2015 as instructed by the
Court through and by Justice Sotomayer, reviewing Justice for the 10 th Circuit.
Signed and submitted this 29th day of June, 2015.
____________________________.

DECLARATION of MAILING CERTIFICATE AFFADAVIT


In compliance with 28 U.S. C. 1746, reciting the facts and circumstances of
service in accordance with U.S. Supreme Cr. Rule 29 (c) I do hereby declare under
penalty of law that I mailed, via 1st class U.S. Mail and Email, a true and correct copy
of the forgoing:
1- MOTION /APPLICATION FOR TIME EXTENSION FOR PETITIONER TO
COMPLY

Postage pre-paid, to the RESPONDENT(s), by and through Counsel(s) of


Record at:

And also: The Court & Solicitor General of the United States at:
Solicitor General of the United States
Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. ,
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro et. al, Case No. 14-9396
U.S. Supreme Court
1 First Street N. E.
Washington DC 20543 meritsbriefs@supremecourt.gov

On this 29th Day of June, 2015.


3

Judy v. Obama et. al.,

Signature of Mailer /s/Cody Robert Judy _________________________