You are on page 1of 5

IL

COON ~,
C. M. S.

RESOLUTION NO.

RESOLUTION REVERSING

CARE

MAXIMUM

A

GRANTING

SAME

OF

DENYING

TO

CITY

THE

MAJOR

A

A

ESTABLISH

FACILITY AT

353

ATHOL

AVENUE

WOMEN

AND

EIGHT

BABIES

EIGHT

OF

DRUG

FROM

RECOVERING

DECISION

PERMIT

USE

CONDITIONAL
RESIDENTIAL
FOR

THE

COMMISSION

PLANNING

UPON

AND

ALCOHOL

AND

ABUSE,

CONDITIONS.

WHEREAS, applicants, the Solid Foundation, sought

Major
City
Group
permit
operate
for a maximum of eight women residents undergoing rehabilitafrom drug and/or alcohol dependency and up to eight of their

Conditional Use
Home

tion
infants

at

WHEREAS, the proposed residential
licensed

by

Programs

the

as

State of
a

California

Group

rehabilitation to the

WHEREAS,

a

a

Avenue; and

Athol

353

of Oakland to

from the

on

eight

has been
and Drug

the

of

purpose
residents and their eight

about

or

Department

for

Home

facility

of Alcohol

care

November

providing
infants; and

25, 1991, after

a

duly

public hearing, the City Planning Commission rendered a tie
vote on the application, which according to the Commission's Rules
and Regulations constitutes a denial of the application; and
noticed

thereafter

WHEREAS,

therefor,

an

Commission,

appeal

was

filed

and thereafter

said decision

came

before

and

from

within

the

the

decision

time
of

public notice was provided
City Council;

the

provided
Planning

and review of

the

WHEREAS, the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act ( CEQA) of 1970, the Guidelines as prescribed by the
Secretary for Resources, and the provisions of the Statement of
Objectives, Criteria and Procedures for Implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act: City of Oakland, have been
satisfied, and that in accordance with Section 15301 of the
California Code of Regulations this project is exempt from the
provisions of CEQA; now, therefore, be it
NOTICE
ALL.
TO

PARTIES:

time within which judicial review must tai
nht of this decision of the City Coun~- ~ ,,
ner'

by Section 1094-.C of the Co:~(~

Proce:~~;
re cf the State of California. ' ~+
h
I~;~
n exceptions, the time is
600245 (7/
83)

from the date of the decision.

ninety ;30) rs
-,.;

Att3dzaazt I

CITY OF OAKLAND
INTEROFFICE LETTER
To:
Office of the City

TE: November 13. 1991

Man~
aer ArrErmoe:

Q,

FROM:

Minnie Thomas/Solid Foundation

sus.
iECr:

An
Avenue

inspection relative

on

to fire and fife

safety

was

conducted at 353 Athol

November 5, 1991.
'

inspection revealed that the above referenced address is a two story Type
V dwelling of nonrated construction. The proposed use is for a Group 1, Division 1
occupancy. The following requirements must be met in order to meet the intent of
Title 24, Chapter 10, Section 1002(a)and to obtain an approved fire safety
inspection:
The

1.

A

fully automatic sprinkler system shall

be installed

throughout the

occupancy

U.
B.Standard 38-1.
per C.

required from each floor level.

2.

A second exit is

3.

Pull Alarm Stations at front and

4.

Interconnected smoke detection system

5.

Interior

stairways need

not be

rear

exits

on

both floor levels.

protecting all sleeping

areas.

enclosed, or provided with floor separations

or

smoke barriers, where an exterior exit and stairway is provided from floors
housing guests above the first floor, providing such exterior exit and stairway

exposed to the open interior
1004 (5).
Section
C.
A.
N
C
.
.,
1988,
stairway per Title 24, B.
are so

free

arranged

that access thereto will not be

Should you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please feel
00 a.
m. and 9:
00 a.
m. at
give me a call weekday mornings between 7:

to

extension 3851.
RD:va

ATTACHMENT

1