Nature du document
Numro de cour:
410-17-001343-1 56
Expditeur:
Tlcopieurdel'metteur: 514-982-4099
Lieu de la transmission
Montral
Date de la transmission
2O
Heure de la transmission
juillet 2015
11h34
\'
-'\r.
t\'(
,I
1\
'r )-
\1''
\o\,
Couniel : trudel@infoteck.qc.ca
N 4U93 P.
',)
ANADA
PROVINCE OF QUBEG
ISTRICT OF SAINT,MAURICE
N:
410-1
7^a>L?./3- l SG
SUPERIOR GOURT
-and-
corporation duly
incorporaled under the laws of Nevada, hving
;
busness at 601 E Charleston Btvd., in the-citiirr
of Lai
Vegas, Nevada, United States of America;
Plaintiffs
t)
Ja
v.
Defendents
MOTION TO INSTITUTE PROGEEDINGS FOR INTERLOCUTORY
AND PERIIIANENT INJUNCTION
(Art, 7F1 and ff C.C.p.)
I,
1-
INTRODUCTION
For the reasors expounded hereinbelow, the Plaintiffs,
Mr. Steve Saleen (,,Mr. saleen")
and Saleen Automotive, lnc- ("SAl"), hereby seek interlocr.rtory and permanent
njunctive
orders against the Defendant, Mr. Frdric Larnbert ("Mr. Lamberfl),
restraining hirn,
vv,rv,
LvtJ
lt,JIfi1
l\]'
4893 P, 3
ll.
THE PARTIES
4.
5.
6.
as Exhibit
and as apears from $Al's Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended March 31,
8_
dornain narne
of the
website
"Blacksheepplanet,'
I l;J?fllvl
N"
4893 P, 4
10'
to
III.
11'
12'
13'
14'
15.
Saturday,
July 19,
2439
2014
01:27:58 PM
Quote;
a dishonest sheme; a fraud_
N"
4893 P, \
-4the
he
624s
22,2A16
6:04:29 PM
http:/lacksheeFplanet.com/inrlex, php/category/oars/
To this day no one has been abla t
Saleen. Only invalid claims
which was never actually
emails, which s even more
he was forging emails in wh
Thursday,
6489
June 4, 2015
12:51:53 PM
Sunday,
6988
June 7, 2015
l1:47:t6 AM
I.l
Sundy,
6993
June 7,201F
01:08:43 FM
Th whol c
\a
He was invo
saleen
dozen of dealerships,
The l(BM guys, the Kraher brothers, they had to settle with
the SEC a
bunch of times.,.
frl'
4893 P,
-5Wednesday,
July 01,
2015
08;33:15 AM
11117
ifi*
Wednesday,
July 01,
2015
9:26:14 AM
11121
END.'
r..l
My findirrgs we rot more afarming than a
simpre bad investment
opporturrity, it insiead unavere_d stoir manipuuon
ii
ffiminaractivities. r shared my findings wiffrne
sEG "mJng
and snce rhen
thlngs have ntensified.
t,.1
t.1
n party_
ressed as a
Both these guys have criminalcases against
them including rape.
These are the type of peopte Saleen cloes business
with.,.
11434
July 13,
2015
09:07:26 PM
16
11547
I.I
All I see from steve sareen
l\j"
4893 P. I
-617
19'
20-
21'
22.
23.
The Defamatory Postings are also cited on multiple instances on olher investment
websites, including the website "board reade/', on Saleen's Topic profile page,
as
appears from a printed extract of the Saleen's Topic Profile page "board
reade' webste
as of July 16, 2015 communicated as Exhlbt p-l0.
24_
N"
4893 P, I
25,
ln ths article, Mr' Lambert acctlsed the Plaintiffs of baing nvolved n a fraudulent
scheme also involving the lnvestorsHub website and also engaged in personal
attacks
against Mr. Saleen's daughter, the whole as ppears from Exhibit p_11.
28.
aforementioned
defamatory statements, the Plaintiffs have suffered damages to their reputation, shame,
embarrassmnt, and, possibly, loe of business sales which cannot be assessecl,
at
least for the moment. These ongoing damages are unquantifiable and irreparable.
?7
It is noteworthy that, since April 2015, the Alias has markedly increased the frequency
of
his Defamatory Postings, Remarkably, the volume of trades of SAI's slocks has grown
significantly over the same periorl of time, as hs the levet of stock volatility,
as appers
from an extract from $Al's website communicated as Exhibit p-12.
28'
lt is equally
reasonable
29.
ln fact' the volume of trades of SAI's stock has recently increased dramatically, spiging
at2?1,228,304 shares traded on or about June 21,2A15 (Exhibit p-1ll and the price of
sAlrs stock has significantly declined over the last three rnonths, l.e. -g4% of lts value
over the last three months end -33% of its value over the last month (Exhibt p-1?);
30.
ln
and business prospects. They are also seemingly affecting fhe market and may thus
cause damages io ihird parties and other nvestors.
31
As appears, inter alra, from the Defamatory Posting number 11117 (Exhibit p-Z), the
Alias'goal is to continue his destructive defamatory act, or, as he puts it, "se it to the
ND'.
IV,
aa
33'
34.
35,
showinghisemailaddress(andhisfullname,a$
appears frorn the posting communicated as Exhlbit p-13,
36.
on August 18, 2014, the same narne and email address were used irr a webforrr
submission to SAl, Mr, Lambsrt posed as a potential customr,
es appars from the
printed copy of the said submission communicated
as xhibit p-14.
37
On August 21,2014, the same emait acldress and neme were used
in an email was sent
in to the sAl's Public Relation Department's mailbox requestng
information, this time, as
39
40
vvrru,
LvtJ
lt,J/ntIt
41
42
43.
44
A Linkedln profile searclr for Mr. Lambert (Exhibit P-3) also tinks same to a profle
with
the same name and pictures than those used on Mr. Lambert's
Twitter profite (Exhibit p18).
45.
A Facebook profile search for Mr. Larnbert links to a profile with the same image
arrd
name as used on the "ZalKon.com" webpage (Exhibit P-1), es eppears from the printed
extracts of Mr. Lambe1's Facebook profile communicated as Exhibit p-1g.
46.
Moreover, the fact the Mr. Lambert pubtishes on various websites using aliases
commencing with "Fred", i,e. "Fred Lambert" on BlacksheepFlanet.corn, ,,Fredresta'on
http:/futww-reddit.com/r/teslamotors and the Alias on invertorsHub, makes evdent fhat
only one individual - who has a special interest in Tesla products and disparaging
SAI
i behind lhese aliases.
47.
Furthermore, the cross-references between sorlle of the Defarratory postirrgs (see, for
examples, Defamatory Posting number 624t, Exhibit P-7 en /iasse) and Mr, Lambert's
website (Exhibit P-4) corroborate the relationship between Mr. Lambert and the
aforementioned aliases.
48.
ln light of the foregoing, it s urrquestionable that Mr. Lambert is the author of the
Defamatory Postings.
V,
49
As further described below. the Plaintiffs hereby seek manc,aiory orders destined at,
inter alia, halting Mr' Lambert from posting, sharing, linking or otherwise dissemnating
vulrv,
vtJ
ll,J0ivl
I\l'
4893 P, I
50'
A.
At the lnterlocutory Stage: the Plaintiffsr Prima Facie Right to the Sought
orders
51
For the reesons set forth above, the Plaintiffs are entfied to the sought
orders: the
Defamatory Postings and the other detamalory comrnents cited
in Section lll above are
bereft of arry foundation and are extremely prejudicial-
52.
53,
E.
54.
55.
Being acused of fraud on the rnarltet conspraces is one of the most prejudicial
accusations for a publicly-traded corporalion such as SAI_
56_
57.
C.
58-
Moreover, this Honourable Court cannot ignore the prejudicial impact of the Defamatory
Postings on the trading of SAI's stock, which rlirectly irnpact SAI's finan6ng
capcity but
the merket as well.
I /
| | I JVt|il
]' 4893 P,
12
-11 -
59'
60'
6l'
62'
Should lhe sought orders not be granted, the Plaintiffs' reputation will
continue to be
harmed.
.
63.
lt is crucial that thia Honourable Court issue the sought interlocutory ordrs as
soon as
possible, and in any evenl no tonger than five (5) days following
the filing of the present
proceedings, given the following reason:
a)
b)
c)
64.
65.
66.
87.
the
efamatory Postngs and continues to persistently, and on a daily basis, issue
such Defamatory postings;
The volume of trades of SAI's stock has reoently increased drarnatically, spiking
a|221,228,304 shares traded on or about June 19, 2015 (Exhibit p-12);
The price of sAl's stock has significantly declined over the last three months,
i,e.
94% of its velue over the last three months and 33% of its value over the tast
month (Exhibit P-12);
The Plaintffs therefore request that the Mofion for Interlocutory lnjuncton be heard no
later than five (s) days of the filing of the present proceedings.
Lv
t J
| | t JJt\lll
[l' 4893 P. I b
-14-
79'
80,
8f
'
82'
83'
84'
85'
Bo'
87
'
88'
89.
IS'SUE ny other order that this Court may find necessary or useful
in the circumstances;
g0'
a)
b)
c)
d)
g2
93.
94
95.
vv
r r4vr
LV tJ
i\r +UYJ
I tr-Tvrilil
l, )l
-16.96
ISSUE ny othr ordr that this Courl may fnd necessary or useful in
the circumstances;
97.
E
&
Attorneys for the Plaintiffs
P
LL
-17
N +yJ t,
NOTICE OF PRESENTATION
To
Frederic Lambert
795, Chemin de la Baie
-nd- John
Defendants
th
at
0r
L
&
lE
f\l'
-18-
4893 P,
NOTICE TO DEFENANT
(Article 119 of the C.G.p.)
advocare;
EB
To file an answe
g !r
TiqijlLitjiTf'f."ffiifffi_,",1,1
Qubec, GgN
s Moilon.
ff.tli*
to
P-t;
P.2l
sAl's Annual Report (fgrm. lO-K) for the year ended March g1, z01F
fled wfth
the U.S. Securilios and Exchange Commision;
P'3:
P4:
P-5:
P-6:
P'7:
information on ,,BfacksheepFlanet"
P-8:
P-9;
sample
- posfer
of
Defanratory
"boarlreader.com" websile
webste as of July 16, Z01S;
P'11;
profilo of "Fredvosto, as of
ssr
rv,
LvtJ
I t.-Tl'ltYl
P-14:
P-1S; Prlnted
sAl
stoclr
oJ
lF fry,lt"r
P'19:
t exceed
of MlProcedurc
could be liable for
Montral, July 12,2018
846343.tr