Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EDTECH 503
Instructional Design Final Project
Submitted to: Dr. Yu-Hui Ching
Spring 2014
Table of Contents
SYNTHESIS/REFLECTION PAPER
Part 1. Topic 3
1a. Stated learning goal
1c. Rationale 6
Part 2. Analysis Report
.... 19
.. 19
expectations and the guest combination was enjoyable. The hostess further reflects upon the
degree of achieving her ultimate goal and what she learned from the experience plus what she
can do differently to make her next dinner party better. Likewise the designer evaluates the
program to determine if the goal was met with surveys, interviews or questionnaires.
This metaphor simplistically synthesizes this semesters learning. In reality the
theoretically challenging course content, resulted in viewing instruction as a complex systematic
process where models are used to visualize the process. In totality my learning is threefold.
First, I learned to use the ABCD method to write explicit objectives that are directly linked to the
assessment that is developed before the instruction. Understanding the congruency between
objectives, content and assessment presented an Aha moment of why some prepackaged
curriculums never result in the learning outcomes promised; methodical alignment is crucial for
the instruction to yield the outcomes. The part of this especially meaningful was creating the
Information-Processing Analysis charts. Although time consuming, I saw the results when I
taught a modified version of my lesson. With the alignment, my instruction became extremely
focused and every student succeeded in meeting the goal. As predicted in module 3s reflection,
the lesson was richer and more targeted than before.
The second take away is the value of summative evaluation. The purpose of summative
evaluation is to collect, analyze and summarize data to present to decision makers... (Smith &
Ragan, 2005). For schools focused on using scientific data, learning to use this skill to evaluate
lessons, units or even my library program is valuable. Creating a subjective evaluation with some
data reflects my current style, however learning to be more goal oriented will produce more
quantitative data which resonances more with my administration. Publicly establishing my goal
for the library program and using Smith and Ragans methodical procedures, I plan to execute a
summative evaluation to present to decision makers. Using information from our text and
other sources, I will plan the evaluation this summer and execute it spring 2015.
In another class this semester, I designed and developed an online course with
implementation scheduled for this fall. Using the International Association for K-12 Online
Learning standards was stressed more than systematically using an ID model. With the
advantages of working through the design process now understandable to me, I plan this summer
to revisit the course. Creating a design document with all the components will undoubtedly
improve the courses potential to reach my adult learners. But in addition it will supply the
University of Alaska with needed documentation about the course to persuade them to offer it for
credit. This is especially necessary since I do not have my M.E.T. yet and consequently my
credibility to teach the course is questioned.
On balance, teachers may not be instructional designers but learning to use the ADDIE
model when designing instruction is very beneficial. Practicing application of the model during
my journey in the EdTech program and with my future endeavors cited above will embed the
process in my repertoire of teaching practices. This will be invaluable when I move to a
technology integration position in the future.
References
Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996). The Systematic Design of Instruction (4th Ed.). New York: Harper Collins
College Publisher.
Smith, P.L., & Ragan, T.J. (2005). Instructional Design (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Part 1. Topic
1a. Stated learning goal
When using Animoto, 7th grade learners will create a one-minute video book trailer that
includes five story elements and public domain images
1b. Description of the audience
The 265 seventh graders enrolled in paperless 7th grade Language Arts classes comprise the
target audience. This Title I middle school of 820 includes students with limited experience
using technology for learning; there are no technology classes at the elementary school and
currently no technology classes at the middle school.
1c. Rationale
Currently targeted learners receive lecture instruction in story structure and elements in their
Language Arts classes while reading a literature selection. Students create a pencil and paper
drawing of the structure. Seeking to innovate, teachers will collaborate with the library
media specialist to integrate technology into a review lesson to increase engagement and
retention of the concepts. This is particularly desirable prior to testing in April because the
included concepts are covered on both state and MAP testing instruments. Students after
reading a self-selected fiction book, receive instruction in the procedure of creating a video
book trailer by the librarian. Teachers will supply the required class time and support during
the process.
Overall a supplantive strategy is employed in this lesson. Smith and Ragan state the
supplantive strategy is optimal for completing instruction when the time is limited (2005,
p.142). Also since all learners are expected to learn to at least a minimum level of
competence and the book trailer video is created with a series of steps, scaffolding is
necessary to reach the predictable learning outcomes. Scaffolding will include microdemonstration videos of each step to provide timely assistance in these large classes,
allowing students to repeat instructions as needed or move ahead at their own pace. This
strategy, in conjunction with chucking the multiple steps into smaller sections, will mitigate
cognitive overload and anxiety for the majority of students unfamiliar with the program and
using public domain images.
Since the cognitive process required involves completing a series of steps, the goal is best
accomplished with a procedural instructional strategy. To make an Animoto video requires
following a process that is complex for these learners. The procedures also include branches
where decisions are made for images, music and style with each decision effecting the
concept retention of either story elements or ethical use of intellectual property. Streamlining
the procedural instruction requires making specific design decisions, for example including
book trailer samples that embody the required elements detailed on the rubric. Also
providing students with a credit slide template reduces the complexity of that particular step.
Another choice is focusing attention by providing students with a checklist of the steps
necessary to complete the entire trailer. This visual aide allows students to monitor their own
progress. In addition a student checks the appropriateness of completed steps by previewing
his/her video periodically throughout the process. Creation of a video book trailer is a new
process for these learners and by designing explicit procedural instructions for the process
strengthens the potential for learners to succeed.
6
The affective characteristics on the survey reveal a group of students who do like to learn and
read, but conditionally. Students desire autonomy as 43% said the enjoyed learning new things
on their own. Results from the Piers-Harris sample reveal an average self-esteem level for these
middle school students with a balanced self-evaluation disclosed in subcategories typical of
development at age 12-13. These results show students within the normal range affectively
which translates into the ability to engage in new learning with guidance and feedback.
2b. Description of the learning context
2b1: Learning context
The learners will receive instruction in the library media center and their
classroom in how to plan, design, build and produce a video book trailer. The
librarian will introduce the project, model the process of creating a trailer and
teach ethical and legal use of digital images. The library is equipped with an
interactive whiteboard with speakers connected to a laptop. There are also 19
student Internet connected PC computers.
The LA classrooms each use a 1:1 model with Internet connected PC desktop
computers. The rooms adjoin one another for easy collaboration. Both tech savvy
classroom teachers will guide the students through the process after initial
10
11
Part 3. Planning
3a: Learning objectives
Learners will:
1. Given access to Google Advanced Search and other resources, identify and save 10-15
images that depict story elements for selected book.
1.1 List three ways intellectual property enters the public domain and why giving
credit is required.
1.2 Identify public domain images that interpret the books setting, characters,
conflict(s), theme, and rising action.
2. Given access to an online citation maker, construct correctly formatted MLA citations
for all images.
2.1 Using NoodleTools recall and demonstrate procedure to cite digital image.
2.2 Using image URLs open source websites, identify and apply required
information to construct complete citations.
3. Using citations created and PowerPoint program, apply formatting requirement to
create credit slide with less than three errors.
3.1 In PowerPoint, apply formatting specifications including background color
and font size, color, and positioning.
4. Using Animoto tutorials develop a flow chart to accurately identify the six steps
required to produce a video.
4.1 Given directions, apply steps to establish an Animoto educational account.
4.2 Using Microsoft word, construct a flow-chart depicting the six steps.
5. Given a choice of styles in Animoto, explain how video styles can communicate genre
and mood.
5.1 Compare and contrast style options to select the most relevant for books
genre and mood.
5.2 Explain in a paragraph why selected style conveys books genre and mood.
6. Given selected images, arrange and add text slides to clearly express the books
conflict.
6.1 After distinguishing images limitations of communicating story,
compose transition text and captions to complete story.
6.2 Translate peer feedback into revisions to improve videos expression of
conflict.
7. Given choices of music, explain in writing why the music selected communicates the
genre and/or mood of the book.
7.1 Compare and contrast music options.
7.2 Explain in a paragraph why music selected clearly communicates genre
and/or mood.
8. Given editing options in Animoto, evaluate and edit trailer design as needed to
communicate a coherent story including five story elements.
8.1 After previewing video, apply editing as needed including video and music
pacing.
8.2 During the producing stage, apply editing to include title, producer
and thumbnail.
9. Use the Book Trailer Rubric, to self-assess product and process.
9.1 Using rubrics to assess book trailer, appraise changes necessary to
align product with rubric.
9.2 Using self-reflection prompts assess successes and challenges of
creating their book trailer.
10. After viewing the final video with peers, verbally devise and describe possible
changes to incorporate missing Animoto design and story elements.
10.1 Using listening and speaking skills respond to peers comments and questions
in a respectful manner.
10.2 After class reviews video, explain what changes could be made to
incorporate missing story elements and Animoto design elements.
Format of
Assessment
Description
of test form
Sample items
Pencil &
Paper
Constructed
answer on
student
worksheet
Synthesis
Performance
Observation
with Checklist
Application
Performance
Observation
with Checklist
Comprehension
Pencil &
Paper
Constructed
answer on
student
worksheet
Correct punctuation
Format with
hanging indent
Alphabetical order
The Credit Slide includes:
Dark background
Title
Correctly
formatted citations
Mechanics
Saved as a jpeg
Create a flowchart depicting the
6 steps
Comprehension
Pencil &
Paper
Constructed
answer on
student
worksheet
Synthesis
Performance
Peer review
Comprehension
Pencil &
Paper
Constructed
answer on
Book Trailer
Guide
Synthesis
Performance
Observation
with Checklist
Evaluation
Pencil &
Paper
Rubric with
constructed
answers
on Reflection
worksheet
Synthesis
Performance
Observation
with checklist
ATTENTION
A.1 Perceptual Arousal
> Show quality book trailers: Matched The Fault in Our Stars George Washington, Spymaster.
A2. Inquiry Arousal
> Ask a series of questions to spur thought about why and how book trailers are created.
A3. Variability
> Show other student created trailers and then show Animoto. http://animoto.com/
RELEVANCE
R1. Goal orientation
> Instructor inquires about students desire/experience to use technology to create videos for
personal use by asking questions.
R2. Motive matching
> Tie desire to create movies to book trailer for self-selected book read.
> Post and explain lesson goal.
R3. Familiarity
> Review commonalities of trailers including story elements and emphasizing conflict.
CONFIDENCE
C1. Learning requirements
> Provide students with systematic instructions and access to short video tutorials.
> Periodically show sample book trailers and have students score using rubric.
> Demonstrate how to use Animoto.
C2. Success opportunities
> Allow students to work through the steps independently.
> Give an opportunity to share with peers and revise.
> Provides feedback at specific steps in the process and as needed.
> Differentiate support based on individual student needs.
C3. Personal control
> Give maximum opportunities for creativity in design of their book trailer.
> Access to rubric will guide students self-evaluation of their product before showcasing.
SATISFACTION
S1. Natural consequences
> Explore with students how this video creation tool can be used for other school or personal
projects.
S2. Positive consequences
> Showcase videos with others in the class.
> Provide constructive feedback that applauds accomplishment of goal and fosters
improvements.
> Create QR codes linked to trailer to attach to the book to ensure wider viewing audience.
S3. Equity
> Adjust expectations according to time, student abilities and self-reflection.
> Ensure students understand the expectations throughout the process.
> Ensure students receive timely feedback and support as needed.
Keller, J. M. (1987). The systematic process of motivational design. Performance & Instruction, 26
(9/10), 1-8.
chucks. If they follow the guide and use the resources suggested, they will create a quality
book trailer and learn how to efficiently use the program.
2. Introduce students to Animoto. com with a simple overview of the features. Use a video
already or mostly complete to demonstrate the steps. It is best to do this using lab
management software such as LanSchool, if possible.
Body
Recall relevant prior knowledge or Stimulate recall of prior knowledge
1. Ask students to rewatch one of the videos previously shown. Identify the story elements
revealed in the book trailer displaying them on the whiteboard. An example for Fablehaven is
provided. (Appendix B)
2. If necessary, provide students with the Book Trailer Picture Guide worksheet. The definitions
are listed on the worksheet. After reviewing the book trailers story elements, apply this activity
to the books students read using the worksheet. This worksheet will be included in the
instruction packet.
Process information and examples or Present information and examples
1. Distribute the Guide to Making a Book Trailer packet. Explain they will be successful and
complete the project if they follow the steps in the recommended steps. Also, draw attention to
the rubric in the back of the packet and read through the expectations. Ask/answer questions to
ensure understanding of expectations. Explain that the QR codes in the guide will lead them to
the tutorials for each step. They will need a QR code reader installed on their own device or
they can access them from the Cool Web Tools webpage.
2. Show the Fablehaven trailer and ask students to pay attention to the images. All images must
be in the public domain, which means they are free to use without paying royalty or asking
permission. Review the meaning of the following terms: public domain, intellectual property,
citation, URL. For a review before the lesson consult resources in Appendix B.
3. Demonstrate how to locate and save images. Draw attention to the list of image sources
provided on the website Royalty Free Images and Music for Projects. Demonstrate also how
to save the URL for generating citations in a later step.
4. Demonstrate how to write captions and supporting text on the storyboard worksheet.
5. Demonstrate the process of using Animoto by creating a video for the storyboard sample.
6. Demonstrate the process in PowerPoint of creating and saving the credit slide.
Focus Attention or Gain & Direct Attention
1. Show sample book trailers created using Animoto and ask students to evaluate the quality
based on the rubric. Inclusion of poorly created trailers is necessary for students to understand
the level of quality expected.
2. Ask students to share their video with a peer who has not read their book. Creators will ask
them to identify the story elements and explain the plot plus look for spelling errors. If aspects
are unclear, the creator should consider revising.
Timing in Lesson
Material
Before lesson
Distributed during
Preview the Learning
Activity; used
throughout the whole
process
directs students to
quality images not
filtered at school
Guide to evaluating own
product and process;
development of
metacognition skills
Short videos to support
auditory and visual
learners; can be stopped
and watched repeatedly
during the process as
needed; accessible on
the Cool Web Tools page
or with QR codes on the
guide
Provides scaffolding for
students with no
experience using PPT
During assessment
phase after class
showcase
Video Tutorials:
Locating & Saving Images
NoodleTools
Creating Credit Slide
Animoto Overview
Creating QR Codes
5. Ask the learners to carefully study the instructional materials; ask the learners to write
down reactions and record comments.
6. Ask the learners to carefully read the instructional materials aloud and write down
reactions and comments.
7. Ask the learners to perform the activities; ask the learners to write down reactions and
record comments. (note: this will take two class periods)
8. Interview the learners according to the interview question checklist. (see appendix)
9. Ask each learner if he/she has any additional comments, questions or
recommendations.
10. Thank learners for time and effort.
6c: Small Group evaluation plan
After revising the instruction based on feedback received in the previous evaluation stage, the
designer will conduct a Small Group Evaluation. The designer tries out the unfinished instruction
with a group of ten learners and records their performances and comments. My plan includes two
students working through the instructional materials individually. Then revise instruction based
on the qualitative and quantitative data and repeat the cycle twice with three learners each time.
Goals:
Check to ensure problems identified from the one-to-one evaluation are rectified.
Collect data on attitude and time from observation, learners comments and survey
results.
Determine how well the course accomplishes the learning objectives.
Learners: The Small Group Evaluation will be conducted with a targeted group of ten 7th grade
students by choosing them with the following rules:
Divide equally between genders
All received story element instruction in language arts class
None have received instruction in using Animoto to create a book trailer
Instruments: The instrument used to structure this step of the formative evaluation is a survey
sheet (Appendix D)
Designer: Introduce briefly instructional material to the learners; introduce them to the
procedure and the objectives of the formative evaluation.
1. Ask the learners to carefully study the instructional material; ask the learners to write down
reactions and record comments.
2. Ask the learners to carefully consider the lesson media; ask the learners to write down
reactions and record comments.
3. Ask the learners to perform the tasks; ask the learners to write down reactions and record
comments.
4. Ask the learners to fill in the survey.
5. Ask each learner if he/she has any additional comments, questions or recommendations.
6. Thank learners for time and effort.
timeframe of three hours is questionable. Beyond the handbook, the SME actually enjoyed
viewing the Task Analysis Flow Charts and remarked on the thoroughness of the analysis making
formative assessment more transparent for the students.
Subject Content
When asked if the language arts content was accurate she responded it is but said ...the content
is not stressed. The technology part of the assignment supersedes the content. This dovetails
into another comment about the assessments being appropriate to evaluate achieved knowledge,
when she states, Only if the children are able to identify the [story] elements.
When asked whether the pedagogical approach is appropriate for the content she responded,
Yes, it is collaborative and interactive. This project could easily be used in other content areas
too. Further she states, the project is very appropriate for the target audience because it is high
interest and incorporates the theories of learning.
General Comments
My expert also related her interest in emphasizing students using correct and complete citations.
She suggested including a screen shot of Noodletools, the citation generator, and a sample credit
slide in the learners materials.
7c: Comments on Change
Considering the answers to the Interview Questions and the discussion with my expert, I plan to
make changes to the student materials. To increase the focus on the LA content, prompts will be
included on the storyboard listing the elements next to image spaces. Also to scaffold for ELL
and resource students, definitions and images of the story elements will be included in the
worksheet packet. A more comprehensive project checklist reflecting the major parts of the Task
Analysis Flow Charts will be provided to students. As previously stated it will guide students
through the process but also require a teacher/librarian signature after major steps, acting as a
formative assessment check; providing the visual guide to all steps in the process making it more
transparent from the beginning for students. To address her citation concerns, a sample credit
slide will be included in the learners materials. (Appendix C) Further action may not be
necessary since a NoodleTools Creating Image Citations video tutorial will also be included for
teachers to show or learners to watch as many times as necessary. Considering Emilys
experience with technology specifically Animoto, her questioning the three hours allocated for
the lesson deserves attention. However, waiting until after the Small Group Evaluation seems
reasonable since it focuses on judging the time requirements especially for students without
experience using Animoto. Overall my SME provided a different lens for viewing the materials,
offering practical suggestions to improve vital components of this project.
Part 8. AECT Standards Grid
Professional Standards Addressed (AECT)
The following standards, developed by the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT),
and used in the accreditation process established by the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education
(NCATE), are addressed to some degree in this course. The numbers of the standards correspond to the numbers
next to the course tasks show on the list of assignments. Not all standards are addressed explicitly through student
work.
Assignments meeting standard in whole or part
Standard 1: DESIGN
1.1 Instructional Systems Design (ISD)
1.1.1 Analyzing
1.1.2 Designing
1.1.3 Developing
1.1.4 Implementing
1.1.5 Evaluating
1.2 Message Design
1.3 Instructional Strategies
1.4 Learner Characteristics
Standard 2: DEVELOPMENT
2.0 (includes 2.0.1 to 2.0.8)
2.1 Print Technologies
2.2 Audiovisual Technologies
2.3 Computer-Based Technologies
2.4 Integrated Technologies
Standard 3: UTILIZATION
3.0 (includes 3.0.1 & 3.0.2)
3.1 Media Utilization
3.2 Diffusion of Innovations
3.3 Implementation and Institutionalization
3.4 Policies and Regulations
X
X
X
X
X
X
ID Project
ID Project; ID Case Analysis
ID Project
ID Project
ID Project
Selected Discussion Forums; ID Project
X
X
ID Project
ID Project
X
X
ID Project
Reading Quiz; ID Project
(all assignments)
(all assignments)
ID Project
X
X
X
ID Project
ID Project
Standard 4: MANAGEMENT
4.0 (includes 4.0.1 & 4.0.3)
4.1 Project Management
4.2 Resource Management
4.3 Delivery System Management
4.4 Information Management
Standard 5: EVALUATION
5.1 Problem Analysis
5.2 Criterion-Referenced Measurement
5.3 Formative and Summative Evaluation
5.4 Long-Range Planning
2. Describe at least two reasons why instructional design models are useful
3. Identify at least six instructional design models and classify them according to their use
4. Compare and contrast the major elements of three theories of learning as they relate to
instructional design
5. Define instructional design.
6. Define the word systematic as it relates to instructional design
7. Define learning and synthesize its definition with the practice of instructional design
8. Relate the design of instruction to the term educational (or instructional) technology
9. Describe the major components of the instructional design process and the functions of
models in the design process
10. Provide a succinct summary of various learning contexts (declarative knowledge,
conceptual, declarative, principle, problem-solving, cognitive, attitudinal, and
psychomotor)
11. Build an instructional design product that integrates major aspects of the systematic
process and make this available on the web.
a. Describe the rationale for and processes associated with needs, learner, context,
goal, and task analyses
i.
ii.
Identify methods and materials for communicating subject matter that are
contextually relevant
b. Describe the rationale for and processes associated with creating design
documents (objectives, motivation, etc.)
i.
ii.
iii.
d. Describe the rationale and processes associated with the formative evaluation of
instructional products
i.
12. Identify and use technology resources to enable and empower learners with diverse
backgrounds, characteristics, and abilities.
13. Apply state and national content standards to the development of instructional products
14. Meet selected professional standards developed by the Association for Educational
Communications and Technology
15. Use various technological tools for instructional and professional communication
AECT STANDARDS (Applicable to EDTECH 503)
1.0 Design
1.1 Instructional Systems Design
1.1.a Utilize and implement design principles which specify optimal conditions for learning.
1.1.b Identify a variety of instructional systems design models and apply at least one model.
1.1.1 Analyzing
1.1.1.a Write appropriate objectives for specific content and outcome levels.
1.1.1.b Analyze instructional tasks, content, and context.
1.1.2 Designing
1.1.2.a Create a plan for a topic of a content area (e.g., a thematic unit, a text chapter, an interdisciplinary
unit) to demonstrate application of the principles of macro-level design.
1.1.2.b Create instructional plans (micro-level design) that address the needs of all learners, including
appropriate accommodations for learners with special needs.
1.1.2.d Incorporate contemporary instructional technology processes in the development of interactive
lessons that promote student learning.
1.1.3 Developing
1.1.3.a Produce instructional materials which require the use of multiple media (e.g., computers, video,
projection).
1.1.3.b Demonstrate personal skill development with at least one: computer authoring application, video
tool, or electronic communication application.
1.1.4 Implementing
1.1.4.a Use instructional plans and materials which they have produced in contextualized instructional
settings (e.g., practica, field experiences, training) that address the needs of all learners, including
appropriate accommodations for learners with special needs.
1.1.5 Evaluating
1.1.5.a Utilize a variety of assessment measures to determine the adequacy of learning and instruction.
1.1.5.b Demonstrate the use of formative and summative evaluation within practice and contextualized
field experiences.
1.1.5.c Demonstrate congruency among goals/objectives, instructional strategies, and assessment measures.
1.3 Instructional Strategies
1.3.a Select instructional strategies appropriate for a variety of learner characteristics and learning
situations.
1.3.b Identify at least one instructional model and demonstrate appropriate contextualized application
within practice and field experiences.
1.3.c Analyze their selection of instructional strategies and/or models as influenced by the learning
situation, nature of the specific content, and type of learner objective.
1.3.d Select motivational strategies appropriate for the target learners, task, and learning situation.
1.4 Learner Characteristics
1.4.a Identify a broad range of observed and hypothetical learner characteristics for their particular area(s)
of preparation.
1.4.b Describe and/or document specific learner characteristics which influence the selection of
instructional strategies.
1.4.c Describe and/or document specific learner characteristics which influence the implementation of
instructional strategies.
2.0 Development
2.0.1 Select appropriate media to produce effective learning environments using technology resources.
2.0.2 Use appropriate analog and digital productivity tools to develop instructional and professional
products.
2.0.3 Apply instructional design principles to select appropriate technological tools for the development of
instructional and professional products.
2.0.4 Apply appropriate learning and psychological theories to the selection of appropriate technological
tools and to the development of instructional and professional products.
2.0.5 Apply appropriate evaluation strategies and techniques for assessing effectiveness of instructional and
professional products.
2.0.6 Use the results of evaluation methods and techniques to revise and update instructional and
professional products.
2.0.7 Contribute to a professional portfolio by developing and selecting a variety of productions for
inclusion in the portfolio.
2.1 Print Technologies
2.1.3 Use presentation application software to produce presentations and supplementary materials for
instructional and professional purposes.
2.1.4 Produce instructional and professional products using various aspects of integrated application
programs.
2.3 Computer-Based Technologies
2.3.2 Design, produce, and use digital information with computer-based technologies.
3.0 Utilization
3.1 Media Utilization
3.1.1 Identify key factors in selecting and using technologies appropriate for learning situations specified in
the instructional design process.
4.0 Management
(none specifically addressed in 503)
5.0 Evaluation
5.1 Problem Analysis
5.1.1 Identify and apply problem analysis skills in appropriate school media and
educational technology (SMET) contexts (e.g., conduct needs assessments, identify and
define problems, identify constraints, identify resources, define learner characteristics,
define goals and objectives in instructional systems design, media development and
utilization, program management, and evaluation).
5.2 Criterion-referenced Measurement
5.2.1 Develop and apply criterion-referenced measures in a variety of SMET contexts.
5.3 Formative and Summative Evaluation
5.3.1 Develop and apply formative and summative evaluation strategies in a variety of SMET contexts.
SMET = School Media & Educational Technologies