11 views

Uploaded by Angela Castillejo

Lorents Transformations Bernard R Durney

- 003_p4d_lec_spacetime.pdf
- Leadership Styles for Dealing With People
- Syllabus
- Ics e 2013 Programs
- 9781498722315_preview
- 19640021093
- Advanced Excel Formulas
- rr311403-finite-element-method
- The Physics of Lorentz Transformation (a Simple Derivation of Lorentz Transformation)
- Radiation
- MATRIX ALGEBRA with MATHEMATICA.pdf
- Excel Sheet Functions
- The Extended Relativity Theory in Clifford Spaces
- QFT as Pilot Wave Theory
- 2.Large Data
- NUMB3RS - Lista de Capítulos y Temas
- [EE550] First Progress Report
- matlab_matrics
- md. Imrul Kaes - Assignment Problem 2013-4-17
- Classwork Activity #6 With Solutions

You are on page 1of 9

Bernard R. Durney

2377 Route de Carces, F-83510 Lorgues, France

durney@physics.arizona.edu

Abstract. This paper describes a particularly didactic and transparent derivation of basic properties of the Lorentz group. The generators for rotations and

boosts along an arbitrary direction, as well as their commutation relations, are written as functions of the unit vectors that define the axis of rotation or the direction

of the boost (an approach that can be compared with the one that in electrodynamics, works with the electric and magnetic fields instead of the Maxwell stress

tensor). For finite values of the angle of rotation or the boosts velocity (collectively

denoted by V), the existence of an exponential expansion for the coordinate transformations matrix, M, in terms of GV with G being the generator, requires that

the matrixs derivative with respect to V be equal to GM. This condition can only

be satisfied if the transformation is additive as it is indeed the case for rotations,

but not for velocities. If it is assumed, however, that for boosts such an expansion

exists, with V = V(v), v being the boodts velocity, and if the above condition is

imposed on the boosts matrix, then its expression in terms of hyperbolic cosh(V)

and sinh(V) is recovered with V(= tanh1 (v)).

A general Lorentz transformation can be written as an exponential containing

the sum of a rotation and a boost, which to first order is equal to the product

of a boost with a rotation. The calculations of the second and third order terms

show that the equations for the generators used in this paper, allow to reliably

infer the expressions for the higher order generators, without having recourse to

the commutation relations.

The transformation matrices for Weyl spinors are derived for finite values of

the rotation and velocity, and field representations, leading to the expression for

the angular momentum operator, are studied, as well as the Lorentz transformation

properties of the generators.

1. Rotations and Boosts. Arbitrary Axes. By definition, a Lorentz

transformations of coordinates, namely,

x = x = ( + ) x

(1)

(2)

constraints on the coefficients ,

g = g ,

+ = 0

(3)

where the second equation is the linear version of the first one for small values of

= g ( ). The axis of a rotation by an angle , counter clockwise is

positive, will be denoted by r = (rx , ry , rz ) = (r1 , r2 , r3 ), a unit vector. The matrix

associated with this Lorentz transformation is ( = 1 cos ),

1

0

0

0

0 rx2 + (1 rx2 ) cos rx ry rz sin

rx rz + ry sin

rot (, r) =

0 rx ry + rz sin ry2 + (1 ry2 ) cos

ry rz rx sin

0 rx rz ry sin

ry rz + rx sin rz2 + (1 rz2 ) cos

(4)

The matrix associated with a boost with a velocity v and a direction defined by

the unit vector b = (bx , by , bz ) = (b1 , b2 , b3 ) is given by, ( = (1 v 2 )1/2 , c has

been set equal to one ),

vbx

vby

vbz

vbx 1 + ( 1)b2x ( 1)bx by

( 1)bx bz

(5)

boost (v, b) =

vby ( 1)by bx 1 + ( 1)b2y ( 1)by bz

vbz ( 1)bz bx

( 1)bz by 1 + ( 1)b2z

2. Generators and Commutation Relations. It follows from Eqs.(4) and

(5), that the matrix for a Lorentz transformation, combining a boost and a rotation,

and linear in v and , is given by,

0

vb1

vb2

vb3

vb1

0

r3 r2

= 1 + Grot (r) + vGboost (b) (6)

=1+

vb2 r3

0

r1

vb3 r2 r1

0

where,

and

0

0

Grot (r) =

0

0

0

0

r3

r2

0

b1

Gboost (b) = 2

b

b3

0

r3

0

r1

b1

0

0

0

b2

0

0

0

0

r2

,

r1

0

(7)

b3

0

0

0

(8)

are the generators for a rotation around r, and for a boost along b, respectively. In

the right-hand side of Eq.(6), and v should be interpreted as diagonal matrices.

From Eqs.(7) and (8) one finds that the commutation rules for the rotation-rotation

generators are,

0

0

0

0

0

0

r2 r1 r1 r2 r3 r1 r1 r3

(9)

[Grot (r), Grot (r )] =

1

2

2

1

0 r r r r

0

r3 r2 r2 r3

0 r1 r3 r3 r1 r2 r3 r3 r2 )

0

which obviously defines a rotation. The coefficients of this matrix are the components of the vector r r and clearly,

[Grot (r), Grot (r )] = Grot (r r )

(10)

0

0

0

0

0 b2 b1 b1 b2

0 b3 b1 b1 b3

0

0

b1 b2 b2 b1 b1 b3 b3 b1

0

b2 b3 b3 b2

b3 b2 b2 b3 )

0

(11)

[Gboost (b), Gboost (b )] = Grot (b b )

For the rotation-boost, the commutation relations are,

0

r 2 b3 r 3 b2 r 3 b1 r 1 b3

r 2 b3 r 3 b2

0

0

[Grot (r), Gboost (b)] =

r 3 b1 r 1 b3

0

0

r 1 b2 r 2 b1

0

0

[Grot (r), Gboost (b)] = Gboost (r b)

(12)

r 1 b2 r 2 b1

0

0

(13)

(14)

As expected the commutation relations in Eqs. (10), (12), and (14) are in agreement with those satisfied by the J i and K i generators derived from a Lorentz

transformation as follows,

x = + x = + g x = + g x

1

1

x = + (J ) x

(15)

= + g g

2

2

In Eq.(15), the fifth term appeals to the linear Lorentz condition, + = 0,

followed by a relabeling ( ), and the sixth term shows that the expression for

the generators is given by,

(J )

= g g

(16)

Define,

Ji =

1 ijk jk

J ,

2

K i = J io ,

i =

1 ijk jk

,

2

i = io

(17)

Then, J i , K i satisfy the same commutation rules (namely Eqs.(10), (12) and (14)),

than Grot (r) and Gboost (b) with r and b being equal to e1 , e2 , e3 , the unit basis

vectors. It is now straightforward to show that,

1

x = + (J ) x = (J K ) x

(18)

2

In this equation the first minus sign would be a plus one, if the metric coefficients,

defined in Eq.(2), are reversed. The matrix for the Lorentz transformation defined

in Eq.(18) is found to be,

0

1

2

3

1

0

3 2

(19)

=1+

2

3

0

1

3

2

1

A comparison with Eq.(6) reveals that vbi = i and ri = i Because b and r are

unit vectors it follows that,

v = ( 1 )2 + ( 2 )2 + ( 3 )2

and in consequence,

1/2

, = (1 )2 + (2 )2 + (3 )2

ri = i /| |

bi = i /| |

1/2

(20)

(21)

Therefore i , i determine the axis of rotation and boost, but not the sense of rotation nor the direction of the boost

3. Finite rotations and boosts. The matrix for a general Lorentz transformation is usually written as,

= exp{J + K }

(22)

Working with the generators defined in Eqs.(7) and (8), this expression for is

replaced by,

= exp{Grot (r) + vGboost (b)},

(23)

Eq.(23) is reminiscent of a Taylor expansion for a function of two variables, namely,

f (, v) = exp{ + vv }f (, v)

(24)

where the derivatives play the role of the generators. The derivatives, unlike generators, do however commute.

a) Rotations. It needs to be shown that rot (, r), as given by Eq.(4), is equal

to,

1

1

exp{Grot (r)} = = 1 + Grot (r) + 2 Grot (r)2 + 3 Grot (r)3 + ...... (25)

2

3!

The relabeling rot (, r) = is for notational convenience. For the above expansion to be valid it is necessary that,

= Grot (r)

From Eq.(4) it is found that,

0

0

0

0

(1 rx2 ) sin

rx ry sin rz cos

=

0 rx ry sin + rz cos

(1 ry2 ) sin

0 rx rz sin ry cos ry rz sin + rx cos

(26)

0

rx rz sin + ry cos

ry rz sin rx cos

(1 rz2 ) sin

(27)

and it is straightforward to verify that Eq.(26) is indeed satisfied. Therefore Eq.(25)

is the correct expression for finite rotations.

The expression for rot (, r) in Eq.(4) can be derived from just the first three

terms of the expansion for rot (, r) in Eq.(25): the term in is replaced by sin

and the next one, in 12 2 , by (notice that = 1 cos = 21 2 + O(4 )). How

is this possible?, an alert reader is bound to ask, does not stand in isolation,

instead it is multiplied by Grot (r), which surely cannot be ignored. Very good

question indeed, that allows however for an apparent answer:

Grot (r) = Grot (r)3 = Grot (r)5 = Grot (r)7 = ...., Gboost (b) = Gboost (b)3 =

Gboost (b)5 = Gboost (b)7 = .., Grot (r)2 = Grot (r)4 = Grot (r)6 = Grot (r)8 = ..

Gboost (b)2 = Gboost (b)4 = Gboost (b)6 = Gboost (b)8 = .....

(28)

It is important to keep in mind that Eq.(26) implies the differential version of the

addition of rotations, namely, rot ( + d) = rot ()rot (d). Indeed,

rot ( + d) = rot () + d rot () = rot () + dGrot (r)rot () =

= (1 + dGrot (r))rot () = rot (d)rot ()

(29)

b) Boosts. No expansion for boost analogous to the one for rot , i.e. with

v and Grot (r) Gboost (b), can exist, because as shown above, it would imply

that boost (v + dv) = boost (b)boost (db), in contradiction with the non additive

property of velocities in Relativity. Assume therefore instead that an expansion of

the form (in the text of this paper, and contrary to the Abstract, the symbol V will

designate a function of the velocity, v).

1

V = V(v), boost (V) = exp{VGboost (b)} = 1 + VGboost (b) + V 2 Gboost (b)2 + .....

2

(30)

Then,

V boost (V) = boost (V)Gboost (b)

(31)

is satisfied. Imposing this condition on boost = boost (b, v), as given by Eq.(5),

leads to the following relations,

d

= v,

dV

d(v)

= = (1 v 2 )1/2 ,

dV

(32)

d(1 v 2 )1/2

dv

d dv

dv

d

=

= 2 v

= 2

1 = 2

dV

dV

dV

dV dV

dV

dV

d

1

=

=

tanh1 v

2

dv

1v

dv

(33)

(34)

Therefore,

= cosh(V),

The matrix for the boost, namely boost (v, b) in Eq.(5), can

bx sinh(V)

by sinh(V)

bx sinh(V) 1 + ( 1)b2x ( 1)bx by

boost (V, b) =

by sinh(V) ( 1)by bx 1 + ( 1)b2y

bz sinh(V) ( 1)bz bx

( 1)bz by

now be written,

bz sinh(V)

( 1)bx bz

(35)

( 1)by bz

1 + ( 1)b2z

It is again possible to derive the expression for boost (v, b), (cf. Eq.(5), and Eq.(28))

from the first three terms of Eq.(30). In the linear term of this expansion, replace

V by v (notice that v = d/dV = d cosh(V)/dV = sinh V = V + O(mcV 3 )), and

replacement reproduces the first line and the first column of Eq(5), whereas the

quadratic replacement introduces the factor 1 present in boost (v, b).

c) Rotations and Boosts. Given the Lorentz transformation, LT =

exp{Grot (r)+VGboost (b)}, the problem at hand is to find the product of rotations

and boosts equivalent to LT . To first order in and V, the transformation LT

and exp{Grot (r)} exp{VGboost (b)} are of course equal, but to second order, the

terms in V differ. Therefore a relation of the following form must exist,

exp{Grot (r)+VGboost (b)} = exp{Grot (r)}exp{VGboost (b)}exp{V Gx (v)}

(36)

where is a constant to be determined, x stands for a boost or rotation, and v

for the unit vector that defines the axis of rotation or the boosts direction. The

expression for Gx (v) can be easily inferred: v must be a combination of the vectors

r and b and the obvious choice is v = rb, which defines a boost, as Eq.(14) shows.

Therefore Gx (v) = Gboost (r b). The equality of the terms in V in Eq.(36) leads

then to,

1

(Grot Gboost + Gboost Grot ) = Grot Gboost + Gboost (r b)

2

(37)

which can indeed be satisfied with = 1/2. The notation (to be used from now

on) has been simplified: Grot = Grot (r) and Gboost = Gboost (b). Eq.(37) can also

be written,

1

(38)

[Grot , Gboost ] = Gx (v)

2

If no prior knowledge of Gx (v) had been assumed, this equation would have determined and Gx (v), which, because these are the commutation relations, cannot

be other than Gboost (r b).

It is of interest to calculate the third order terms. There are now two terms,

namely those in 2 V and V 2 , that require to be balanced by two new Lorentz

transformations which are determined by:

1

exp{Grot + VGboost } = exp{Grot } exp{VGboost } exp{ V Gboost (r b)}

2

exp{ 2 V Gx (v)} exp{ V 2 Gy (v )}

(39)

where, x, y stand for boost or rotation and v, v for the vectors defining the axes

of the transformations. It is again possible to infer the expressions for Gx (v) and

Gy (v ). The obvious choices for v and v are now v = r(rb) and v = b(rb).

It is clear that v with two r s and one b, should be associated with 2 V and that

v with two bs and one r, with V 2 . Keeping in mind that r b is a boost, Eq.(14)

suggests that x is a boost, and Eq.(12), that y is a rotation. Therefore,

Gy (v ) = Grot (b (r b))

(40)

1

1

G2rot Gboost + Grot Gboost Grot + Gboost G2rot =

G2rot Gboost Grot Gboost (r b)

6

2

+ Gboost (r (r b))

(41)

dimensional matrices in Eq.(41) are then easily evaluated, and the value found for

is 1/6. Similar calculations for the terms in V 2 show that = 1/3. If no prior

knowledge for Gx (v) is assumed, Gx (v) is of course determined by the commutation

relations from Eq.(41). Contrast this statement with the one appropriate to the

second order terms, where Gx (v) is a member of the commutation relations.

It is clear that the Lorentz transformation exp{Grot (r) + VGboost (b)}, is a

complex product of rotations and boosts, not shedding light (as exp{Grot (r) and

VGboost (b)} do), on finite transformations.

There can be little doubt that the theory of group representations could be developped as well from the product of a boost and a rotation, namely exp{Grot (r)}

exp{VGboost (b)}.

4. Spin. Define,

J (u) = i(Grot (u) iGboost (u))/2 = (iGrot (u) Gboost (u))/2

(42)

[J + (u), J + (u )] = iJ + (u u )

[J (u), J (u )] = iJ (u u )

[J + (u), J (u )] = 0

(43)

With the help of Eqs. (7) and (8), the calculation of (J (u))2 is straightforward.

It is found that (I is the unit matrix),

(J (u))2 = I/4,

(44)

The two degrees of freedom associated with particles of spin 1/2 suggests working

with a representation for the generators on a vector space of dimension two. The

Pauli matrices are given by,

0 1

0 i

1 0

1

2

3

=

=

=

1 0

i 0

0 1

uz

ux iuy

M 2 (u) = I

(45)

M (u) = u =

ux + iuy

uz

The commutation relations for the matrix M (u), defined above, are given by,

Uz

Ux iUy

U = u u

(46)

[M (u), M (u )] = 2i

Ux + iUy

Uz

Define

1

1

L

M (u)

Gboost

(u) = M (u)

J + (u) = 0

(47)

2i

2

1

1

R

R

Gboost

(u) = M (u)

J (u) = 0

(48)

Grot

(u) = M (u)

2i

2

where the J are defined as in Eq.(42) with the G generators replacing the G ones.

L

L

With the help of Eq.(46) it is straightforward to show that Grot

(u), Gboost

(u) (and

R

R

of course Grot (u), Gboost (u) as well), obey the same commutation relations (namely

L

Grot

(u) =

Eqs. (10), (12), and (14)), than Grot (u) and Gboost (u). Eqs. (47) and (48) are

two representations of the Lorentz group, known as the left- and right handed Weyl

spinors, that can be labelled by ((J )2 = 21 , J + = 0) and (J = 0, (J + )2 = 12 )

respectively. It is of interest to calculate the series

1

L

L

(u)2 + ..............

L (, u) = 1 + Grot

(u) + 2 Grot

2

1

L

L

L (V, u) = 1 + VGboost

(u)2 + V 2 Gboost

(u)2 + ..............

(49)

2

L

L

Because the square of the matrix in the expressions for Grot

(u) and Gboost

(u) is

equal to the unit matrix, the calculations are straightforward. it it is found,

cos(/2) iuz sin(/2) i sin(/2)(ux iuy )

L

(, u) =

(50)

i sin(/2)(ux + iuy ) cos(/2) + iuz sin(/2)

cosh(V/2) + uz sinh(V/2)

sinh(V/2)(uz iuy )

L (V, u) =

(51)

sinh(V/2)(uz + iuy )

cosh(V/2) uz sinh(V/2)

For finite rotations and boosts, these matrices define the transformations for

the left handed Weyl spinor components, as rot (, r) and boost (v, b) (in Eqs.

(4) and (35)), do for the coordinates of a Lorentz transformation. For the right

handed Weyl spinor, R (, u) remains unchanged, whereas V is replaced by V

in the expression for R (V, u).

4. Field Representations. Let T ( is line, and is column) be the

antisymmetric tensor associated with the vectors r and b (T 0i = bi , T i0 bi and

the rotational components as in Eq.(7)), then

0

b1

b2

b3

b1

0

r3 r2

(52)

T =

2

3

b

r

0

r1

3

2

1

b r

r

0

Indeed, because of Eq.(2), T 0 i = gi T 0 = gii T 0i = T 0i = bi . On the other

hand, T i 0 = g0 T i = T i0 = bi , i.e., the boost components of T become

symmetric, whereas the rotation components remain antisymmetric but change

sign. The matrix in Eq.(52) is equal to the sum of Grot (r) and Gboost (b) as given

by Eqs. (7) and (8).

We define therefore the following operators,

(53)

The proof that Arot (r, x) and Aboost (b, x) satisfy the same commutation rules than

Grot (r) and Gboost (b), namely Eqs.(10), (12), (14), is straightforward; it appeals to

the relations, Grot (r) = Grot (r) , and Gboost (b) = Gboost (b) , and involves

some relabeling. It should be stressed that the minus signs in Eqs. (53), essential

for this proof, can be firmly justified. The explicit expressions for Arot (r, x) and

Aboost (b, x) are (t, x, y, z = x ),

Arot (r, x) = rx (yz zy ) + ry (zx xz ) + rz (xy yx )

Aboost (b, x) = bx (xt + tx ) + by (yt + ty ) + bz (zt + tz )

(54)

The quantities that multiply the ri , bj in Eq.(54) define the tensor L , namely,

Ljk = (xj k xk j )

L0i = (ti + xi t )

(55)

L = x x

(56)

(c.f. Maggiore, 2005, p.30, Eq.2.78). From Eq.(54) it is clear that, say x y y x ,

is the z-component of the angular momentum. The angular momentum operator

(1 + Arot (r, x))(x) = (x ) x (x ) = (x x ) = (x )

(57)

space for the angular momentum representation is the set of scalar functions.

5. Lorentzs Transformations of the Generators. It is of interest to study

the Lorentz transformations properties of the generators Grot (r) and Gboost (b),

1

namely expressions as boost (b)Grot (ez )1

boost (b) and rot (r)Gboost (ez )rot (r),

c.f., Weinberg, 2005, p.60 (notice that here only rotations are associated with unitary operators). It is found,

boost (b)Grot (ez )1

boost (b) = Grot (ez ) ( 1) bx bz Grot (ex ) + by bz Grot (ey )+

(b2z 1)Grot (ez ) +vGboost (bez ) = Grot (ez )(1)Grot (bz be)+vGboost (bez )

(58)

where v is the boost velocity and = (1 v 2 )1/2 .

rot (r)Gboost (ez )1

rot (r) = Gboost (ez ) + Gboost (ex )(rx rz + ry sin )+

+ Gboost (ey )(ry rz rx sin ) + Gboost (ez )(rz2 1) =

= (1 )Gboost (ez ) + Gboost (rz r e) + Gboost (sin r rz )

(59)

where = 1 cos . In the above equations, e is a unit vector, and the notation

should be transparent: Gboost (b ez ) = by Gboost (ex ) bx Gboost (ey ) for example.

Concerning Eq.(58) notice that it reduces to boost (b)Grot (ez )1

boost (b) = Grot (ez )

if v = 0, because is then equal to one, and also when bx = by = 0 because then

bz = 1, i.e. the boosts are along the axis of rotation. In Equation (59) as well,

Gboost (ez ) is left unchanged if vanihes and also when the axis of the rotations is

the zaxis.

5. Acknowledgements.

I am grateful to Dr. Maggiore for valuable comments.

6. References.

Maggiore, M.: A Modern Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, Oxford University Press, New York, (2005)

Weinberg, S.: The Quantum Theory of Fields Vol 1, Cambridge University

Press, New York, (2005)

- 003_p4d_lec_spacetime.pdfUploaded bygarridolopez
- Leadership Styles for Dealing With PeopleUploaded bySaad Atta
- SyllabusUploaded byAnonymous JPbUTto8tq
- Ics e 2013 ProgramsUploaded byAnonymous loKgur
- 9781498722315_previewUploaded byPedroVázquezPeña
- 19640021093Uploaded byKarpincho3
- Advanced Excel FormulasUploaded byasad.shahzad
- rr311403-finite-element-methodUploaded bySRINIVASA RAO GANTA
- The Physics of Lorentz Transformation (a Simple Derivation of Lorentz Transformation)Uploaded byGlen Peach
- RadiationUploaded bygm
- MATRIX ALGEBRA with MATHEMATICA.pdfUploaded byMustapha El Metoui
- Excel Sheet FunctionsUploaded byFenil Desai
- The Extended Relativity Theory in Clifford SpacesUploaded byKathryn Wilson
- QFT as Pilot Wave TheoryUploaded byWilliam Hobba
- 2.Large DataUploaded byiaset123
- NUMB3RS - Lista de Capítulos y TemasUploaded byRafael González Diez
- [EE550] First Progress ReportUploaded byHamood Riasat Khan
- matlab_matricsUploaded bykrishnagdeshpande
- md. Imrul Kaes - Assignment Problem 2013-4-17Uploaded byImrul Kaes Likhon
- Classwork Activity #6 With SolutionsUploaded byChala1989
- Working with Vectors and Matrices.pdfUploaded bymauricio Lagos rogers
- DraftCivilEngg-2011-12Uploaded byAzmatullah Khan Sherani
- IIT JEE SyllabusUploaded byjitender8
- asmt8ansUploaded byCody Sage
- matlab essxUploaded byAnshulMittal
- Chapter3Outline_IntroChemProcesses (1)Uploaded bygoogley71
- Excel DictioneryUploaded byakhil123456
- State Transition MatrixUploaded byathembo george
- Inian Eco Lecture 02Uploaded byVickey Mehriya
- Project 1Uploaded byDavid Duong

- Delta Dragon 250 bUploaded byAnonymous YqiomOTX
- scoreboard in unifyUploaded byapi-318801605
- Kinetics Simulation of MnS Precipitation in Electrical SteelUploaded bymiltone87
- Craftsman Model 143.416082 Parts ListUploaded byRichard Mancinelli
- The.difference.betweenUploaded byvpaulve
- Göbekli_Tepe_varios.pdfUploaded byHans Martz
- 668 GIS Applications in Civil Engineering (Google Earth)Uploaded byChang Broot
- Breathing ArchitectureUploaded byAbdul Wajid
- Practical Switched Distance RelayUploaded byShahzad Bhatti
- DS11Uploaded byAIRENITROX
- SettlingUploaded byJ Gustavo Lopez
- Syllabus.pdfUploaded byKıymet Kaya
- Characteristics of Modern Operating SystemsUploaded byriyazmbz
- News - eVolo _ Architecture MagazineUploaded byShashank Jain
- ey-transaction-2017.pdfUploaded bybbahb2015
- msc_0306Uploaded bysymon01_ellimac
- Lee - 1995 - Ethnic Conflict and the Development of Citizenship in MalaysiaUploaded byNoreena Burns February
- Forklift Manual & Assessment GuideUploaded bysegundo
- dfw learning outcomes agreement finalUploaded byapi-232193806
- Multistage Centrifugal Pumps - Assessment of a Mixing Plane Method for Cfd AnalysisUploaded byinternational@kishorpumps.com
- B Williams 2015 Doing Research Improve Teaching LearningUploaded bysandovalz244
- Report Flow Water LNG EASY (s) Pte.ltd. - 270916Uploaded byAdri Glr Cahaya Permata
- v-a35d-a40d-lowp-211-4170-0304Uploaded byahmad fikri
- Workshop TemplateUploaded byAdeline Kwan
- Maintenance Work (politeknik)Uploaded bymuhamad syazwan
- Zero to OneUploaded byandycasey900
- Self ActualizationUploaded bynieotyagi
- Catalogo Huck C50L.pdfUploaded byVladimir Sepulveda
- CAT QuantsUploaded byAnanda Dutta
- SL Somos WaterClear Ultra Material Specifications.pdfUploaded byTushar Prakash Chaudhari