9 views

Uploaded by Daanish Maqbool

by Daanish Maqbool and Christopher Cadou
In some investigations of convective heat transfer
in wind tunnels, it is necessary to heat
or cool the walls prior to initiating flow in the t
unnel. However, the heating or cooling
process creates a thermal gradient in the wall due
to some inevitable surface heat loss. This
is problematic because existing methods for inferri
ng gas-wall heat fluxes from wall
temperature-time histories assume (require) that th
e initial temperature of the wall is
uniform. This paper presents a method for adapting
existing techniques for inferring surface
heat flux from temperature-time measurements to sit
uations where the initial wall
temperature is not spatially uniform. This is accom
plished by adding a linear term to the
non-dimensional temperature profile used in previou
s work and showing that the governing
equations and boundary conditions remain unchanged
with the new non-dimensionalization.
The solution for the transient temperature distribu
tion in a wall with an initial temperature
gradient undergoing convective heat transfer is als
o presented. This is useful for designing
heat flux gauges and quantifying potentially signif
icant errors (>5%) that can arise if
thermal gradients in the wall are not accounted for
.

by Daanish Maqbool and Christopher Cadou
In some investigations of convective heat transfer
in wind tunnels, it is necessary to heat
or cool the walls prior to initiating flow in the t
unnel. However, the heating or cooling
process creates a thermal gradient in the wall due
to some inevitable surface heat loss. This
is problematic because existing methods for inferri
ng gas-wall heat fluxes from wall
temperature-time histories assume (require) that th
e initial temperature of the wall is
uniform. This paper presents a method for adapting
existing techniques for inferring surface
heat flux from temperature-time measurements to sit
uations where the initial wall
temperature is not spatially uniform. This is accom
plished by adding a linear term to the
non-dimensional temperature profile used in previou
s work and showing that the governing
equations and boundary conditions remain unchanged
with the new non-dimensionalization.
The solution for the transient temperature distribu
tion in a wall with an initial temperature
gradient undergoing convective heat transfer is als
o presented. This is useful for designing
heat flux gauges and quantifying potentially signif
icant errors (>5%) that can arise if
thermal gradients in the wall are not accounted for
.

© All Rights Reserved

- Clothing Comfort Determining Factors
- Lecture 3 hvac
- 02.2 Temperature FV
- TIPO-Q101-CA_Manual_Spanish_.pdf
- SANS10160-7
- Unsteady HT
- Heat Exchanger and Fin Fan Cooler-Final
- 96 Strip Paper Post
- Script
- On the Design of Thermal Breathing
- ES 183 Syllabus Jan 2017.pdf
- Thermodynamics
- Us 4626387
- Tutorial 3 (ME 206)
- Basic Energy Concepts
- Thermal Characteristics of Louvered Fins With Low Re Number Flow
- Ch+24+Thermal+Questions+-+KEY.pdf
- Chap 02.pdf
- Learning
- V002T08A018-IPC2000-257

You are on page 1of 9

AIAA 2010-4784

for Bodies with Initial Linear Temperature Gradients

University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20782

or cool the walls prior to initiating flow in the tunnel. However, the heating or cooling

process creates a thermal gradient in the wall due to some inevitable surface heat loss. This

is problematic because existing methods for inferring gas-wall heat fluxes from wall

temperature-time histories assume (require) that the initial temperature of the wall is

uniform. This paper presents a method for adapting existing techniques for inferring surface

heat flux from temperature-time measurements to situations where the initial wall

temperature is not spatially uniform. This is accomplished by adding a linear term to the

non-dimensional temperature profile used in previous work and showing that the governing

equations and boundary conditions remain unchanged with the new non-dimensionalization.

The solution for the transient temperature distribution in a wall with an initial temperature

gradient undergoing convective heat transfer is also presented. This is useful for designing

heat flux gauges and quantifying potentially significant errors (>5%) that can arise if

thermal gradients in the wall are not accounted for.

Nomenclature

a

bn

f, g, d

h

in

k

M

N

q

t

T

T0

Ti

Ts

T

T

v,

x

x1

X

1

2

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

curve-fit coefficients

generic functions

convective heat transfer coefficient

repeated integral

thermal conductivity

confluent hypergeometric function

number of terms for curve-fit

surface heat flux

time

temperature

initial temperature/initial surface temperature

local initial temperature

surface temperature

temperature at penetration depth

gas temperature

intermediate/temporary temperature variables

distance/depth

sensor location

non-dimensional distance

thermal diffusivity

gamma function

thermal penetration depth

non-dimensional temperatures

non-dimensional time

Graduate Student, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, 0134 Glenn L. Martin Hall, AIAA student member.

Associate Professor, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, 3179D Glenn L. Martin Hall, AIAA senior member.

1

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

Copyright 2010 by Daanish Maqbool and Christopher Cadou. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission.

I. Introduction

HE J-2X rocket motor is being developed by Pratt & Whitney/Rocketdyne to power the second stage of

NASAs Ares I launch vehicle. The University of Maryland is supporting the development of the engines film

cooled nozzle extension by conducting fundamental investigations of film cooling effectiveness in supersonic

environments. Part of this work involves measuring wall heat flux in a supersonic wind tunnel. The tunnel is a

blow down type in which air from the room is drawn through a nozzle and into a large vacuum chamber. Since the

recovery temperature of the flow in the test section nearly equals the ambient temperature, the difference between

the recovery and test-section wall temperatures is small and so the resulting heat flux is small and difficult to

measure. It is not practical to raise the temperature of the air entering the tunnel so instead the problem is addressed

by heating the walls above the ambient temperature. While studying the inverse (i.e. film heating) problem is

perfectly acceptable for the purpose of the project which is to develop experimentally validated CFD models for

wall heat transfer, it poses a problem for the wall heat flux measurements because the internally heated wall is no

longer isothermal due to some inevitable surface heat loss before the start of the experiment. The first section of this

paper presents a method for adapting existing techniques for inferring surface heat flux from temperature-time

measurements to situations where an initial temperature gradient is present in the wall. The second section develops

an expression for the temporal evolution of the temperature distribution in a wall with an initial temperature gradient

that is suddenly exposed to a known convective heat transfer process. This is useful in developing heat flux

instrumentation for experiments.

The review article by Diller1 discusses many methods for measuring heat flux across a surface. A common

instrument for measuring heat flux in shock tunnels is the thin-film heat flux gauge which is essentially a fastresponding thermistor that is deposited directly on the test surface. Surface heat flux is inferred from the

temperature-time history of the surface (measured by the thin-film gauge) and a 1-D model for the response of the

surface2. A similar approach uses the temperature-time history of a sensor embedded below the test surface3-9. The

latter approach is advantageous in that it does not disturb the flow over the surface and is easier to fabricate. Various

approaches have been taken to infer heat flux from an internal temperature measurement. All have some numerical

aspect; either curve-fitting to a functional form4-5, 7-8 or numerical integration in a finite-differencing scheme6, 9 and

all require that the initial wall temperature be spatially uniform. The latter constraint is the problem here because

heating the wall introduces a relatively large initial temperature gradient (~200 K/m for a surface temperature 50 K

above ambient). The correction described in the first section of this paper is an extension of the method first

presented by Chen and Thomsen4 and later extended by Chen and Chiou7. It could also be applied to most of the

other curve-fitting based interpretation methods. While the correction is developed in response to the film heating

problem described above, it is useful in any situation where one wishes to make transient heat flux measurements

over initially non-isothermal walls. In the second section of this paper, an expression for the transient temperature

distribution in a wall undergoing convective heat transfer with the aforementioned initial condition is derived. This

is useful for predicting the surface heat flux and the temperature response at a prospective sensor location given an

estimate of the flow conditions.

q(t)

Heat Flux

A. Brief Review: Case of Uniform Wall

Temperature

Chen and Chiou7 considered the situation

illustrated in Fig. 1, where a semi-infinite

wall at an initially uniform temperature (i.e.

T(x,0) = constant) is suddenly exposed to an

unknown unsteady heat flux q(t) at the

surface. The objective is to infer the surface

heat flux from the temperature time-history

of a point x1 units below the surface.

The unsteady heat equation is used to

describe the temperature distribution in the

solid:

Semi-infinite

wall

Temperature x1

Measurement

Location

(A)

x

(B)

T

into a semi-infinite wall and the internal temperature measurement

location. Also shown are the two initial temperature distributions

under consideration: (A) uniform initial temperature, and (B) initial

temperature gradient.

2

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

T

2T

= 2

t

x

(1)

t

x1

x

x1

T T0

T0

(2)

where is the thermal diffusivity of the material and T0 is the initial temperature. Using the new variables, the heat

equation and initial conditions become

2

=

X 2

( X ,0) = 0

(1, ) = f ( )

(3)

(, ) = 0

(4)

Using a Laplace transform technique, they showed that if the temperature-time history can be fitted to the

following function:

N

1

n

f ( ) = bn (4 ) (n + 1)i 2 n erfc

n =1

2

(5)

(where in represents a repeated integral) then the coefficients, bn (which are determined using a curve-fitting routine),

can be used to determine the non-dimensional surface temperature and temperature gradient:

N

(0, ) = bn n

(6)

n =1

(0, ) N

(n + 1)

n 1

= bn 2

X

( n + 1 )

n=1

2

(7)

The dimensional surface temperature and heat flux are then given by

Ts = T0 (1 + (0, ))

(8)

kT0 (0, )

x1 X

(9)

q=

where k is the thermal conductivity of the material.

Now, assume that the initial wall temperature profile is linear. The temperature distribution takes the following

form:

T ( x,0) = T0 + ax

where T0 is the initial surface temperature and a is a constant. Now let

3

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

(10)

T (T0 + ax)

T0

(11)

also satisfies the governing equation for unsteady heat conduction. Hence,

2

=

X 2

(12)

( x,0) = 0

(1, t ) = f (t )

(, t ) = 0

(13)

Since the governing equation, initial conditions, and boundary conditions transform to the same problem studied by

Chen and Chiou7, their solution can be used directly by substituting for . The differences are that must now be

curve-fitted instead of and that a correction term must be added when solving for the dimensional value of the

surface heat flux. The surface temperature and heat flux in dimensional terms are given by

Ts = T0 (1 + (0, ))

q=

(14)

kT0 (0, )

ak

x1

X

(15)

To conclude, the procedure for determining the surface heat flux associated with a measured subsurface

temperature-time history when the wall is not initially isothermal is as follows:

1. Convert the temperature-time history into - history where the value for x in is x1, the sensor distance.

2. Curve-fit the - history to the form suggested by Chen and Chiou7 (Eq. 5).

3. Use the coefficients, bn, to determine and d/dX at the surface using Eqs. (6) and (7).

4. Recover the dimensional quantities using Eqs. (14) and (15).

C. A Note on Implementation

In order to implement the aforementioned technique, a numerical curve-fitting (optimization) routine must fit the

temperature-time data from the sensor to the form given by Eq. (5). This involves the repeated integral of the error

function. The repeated integral of an arbitrary function, g(x), is defined as:

x un 1

u1

0 0

i g ( x) =

n

... g (u)du...du

n 2

dun1

(16)

Evaluating and incorporating Eq. (16) into an iterative routine is both challenging and impractical from a

computational perspective because it requires the numerical evaluation of several nested integrals in each iteration.

The expression can be reduced to a single integral using Cauchys formula but there is an even more convenient

form for the particular repeated integral in Eq. (5); the repeated integral of the error function can be written

explicitly in terms of the confluent hypergeometric function10, M, for which explicit numerical routines are

commonly available:

2

1

z

3

n

n +1 1 2

i nerf ( z ) = e z

M

, ,z

M + 1, , z 2

2

2n n + 1 2 2 2n 1 n + 1 2

2

2

4

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

(17)

While use of the confluent hypergeometric function significantly reduces the complexity of the code and

computational time, it is still impractical for a personal computer to calculate Eq. (5) at each iteration of the

optimization routine. To further increase the efficiency of the calculation, note that

N

f ( ) = bn d (n, )

(18)

1

n

d (n, ) = (4 ) (n + 1)i 2 n erfc

(19)

n =1

where

This is the computationally expensive term. So, the values of d(n,) can be

calculated once and stored in an array for use by the optimization routine. This

enables the fitting procedure to be performed in an economical manner suitable

for a personal computer.

T

T0

The development of the expression for the temperature distribution in a wall

undergoing transient convection with an initial temperature gradient (Fig. 2)

follows the same basic steps presented by Carslaw & Jaeger11 in their solution for

the temperature distribution in an initially isothermal wall. The basic idea is to

x

transform the problem into one with a known solution: a semi-infinite solid with

T

an initial non-zero uniform temperature and zero surface temperature. The

Figure 2. Surface convection

transformation is a two step procedure.

The first step is to re-scale the wall temperature in terms of the gas with an initial temperature

temperature (T), the initial gradient (a), and distance, by introducing a new gradient.

variable, v:

v = T (T + ax)

(20)

It can be shown that v satisfies the transient heat conduction equation (Eq. 1):

v

2v

= 2

t

x

(21)

The initial temperature distribution is still given by Eq. (10) and the boundary condition is given by an energy

balance at the surface. So, the initial and boundary conditions are

v( x,0) = T0 T

(22)

(0, t ) h

= (0, t ) a

x

k

(23)

=v

k v k

a

h x h

5

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

(24)

2

= 2

t

x

(25)

k

h

( x,0) = T0 T a

(26)

(0, t ) = 0

(27)

and the problem has been transformed into one of a semi-infinite plate with zero surface temperature and a uniform

initial temperature distribution. The solution to this problem is given by Carslaw & Jaeger11 and can be used directly

to write

x

( x, t ) =

k

2

T0 T a

2 t

u 2

du

(28)

v h h

v + + a = 0

x k

k

(29)

v = e

h x

x

k

h

k

x

h

+ a d + Ce k

k

(30)

The constant C can be determined by noting that the body is semi-infinite. So as x , v T0 - T. Since the value

of v is bounded, C must be zero. Simplifying Eq. (30) gives

h

h x

k

v = e k e k d + a

k

h

(31)

The first term corresponds to the convection problem for a uniform initial temperature wall, whereas the second

term is new and arises from the initial temperature gradient. The first integral has been evaluated by Carslaw &

Jaeger11 and can be used directly. Inserting their solution into Eq. (31) gives the expression for v:

hx h t

+

k x

h

x

k

k k2

v = T0 T a erf

+

e

erfc

+

t + a

h 2 t

2 t k

h

(32)

hx h t

+

k x

h

x

k

k k2

T T = T0 T a erf

+

e

erfc

+

t

+ a + x

h 2 t

2 t k

h

6

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

(33)

Eq. (33) gives the temporal evolution of the temperature distribution in a semi-infinite solid after its surface is

suddenly exposed to a convective heat transfer process. If a = 0, the solution collapses to the original expression

given by Carslaw & Jaeger11 for a semi-infinite slab with uniform initial temperature.

Finally, it should be noted that when

a=

h(T0 T )

k

(34)

the first term on the right side of Eq. (33) vanishes and the solution is time independent. This is not surprising as it

corresponds to the situation where the conductive heat flow towards the surface equals the heat removed by

convection. In this case, the initial condition is also the steady state condition.

T Ts

= 0.99

Ti Ts

(35)

Inserting Eq. (33) into Eq. (35) gives the following implicit expression for the penetration depth:

h h2t

+

k

erf

+e

2 t

k2

h t

h t

h t

k2

erfc

0

.

01

e

erfc

+

0.99

k

2 t

k

=

2

0.01

k

T0 T a

h

(36)

In general, the effect of a on the penetration depth is weak. However, at the steady state (where a is given by Eq.

34), the right side of the equation tends to infinity which means that tends to zero.

Figure 2 illustrates the problem that motivated

342

this work: a convectively cooled MACOR plate (i.e.

the wind tunnel wall) with initial Ts = 340 K, T =

340

317.6 K, h = 435 W/m2-K, and a = 173 K/m. The

plate is exposed to these conditions for

338

approximately 6.8 seconds and we are interested in

predicting the temporal response of the temperature

336

distribution in the plate in addition to the heat flux

at the gas-plate interface. While Eq. (33) was

334

Initial Profile

developed for this purpose, it is desired to verify it

numerically. This is accomplished by solving Eq.

Numerical, a = 173 K/m

332

(1) subject to the boundary conditions of the

Eq. (33), a = 173 K/m

experiment described above. The numerical solution

Eq. (33), a = 0 K/m

330

was obtained by solving Eq. (1) using a central

differencing scheme on a uniform grid with

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

elements spaced 0.13 mm apart and with a time step

Location (mm)

of 1.1 ms.

Figure

3.

Temperature

profiles

through a MACOR plate

Figure

3

compares

plate

temperature

after

6.8

seconds.

distributions predicted using Eq. (33) with and

Temperature (K)

The preceding solutions are built upon the assumption of a semi-infinite body. In practical situations, however,

the semi-infinite assumption can be satisfied as long as the body is thicker than the thermal penetration depth, .

Schultz & Jones2 defined the penetration depth as the distance at which the scaled local temperature differs from the

surface temperature by 1%, which can be presented as12:

7

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

without an initial temperature gradient to the results of the numerical simulation with an initial temperature gradient.

The fact that the numerical and analytical (Eq. 33) results overlap indicate that Eq. (33) is a valid solution to the

problem.

Since the principal motivation of this work is to understand the effect of an initial wall temperature gradient on

convective heat flux measurements, Fig. 4 shows heat fluxes predicted using Eq. (33) for various initial wall

temperature gradients. The heat flux decreases with time because the wall temperature decreases with time. The

figure shows that a positive initial wall temperature gradient increases the heat flux from the wall to the flow. This

means that assuming that the wall temperature is uniform when it is not will underestimate heat transfer when a>0

and overestimate heat transfer when a<0. Although this effect is not strong initially, the differences in heat flux

grow and hence become more important with time. Figure 5 shows the error resulting from assuming a uniform

temperature as a function of time for different values of the initial gradient.

6

a=

a=

a=

a=

9000

8000

0 K/m

-150 K/m

+150 K/m

+300 K/m

% Error

7000

2

0

6000

4000

a = -150 K/m

a = +150 K/m

a = +300 K/m

-2

5000

-4

0

5

10

15

Time (s)

Time (s)

Figure 4. Surface heat flux for different values of the Figure 5. Error in surface heat flux resulting

from assuming a uniform initial temperature.

initial thermal gradient, a.

Of greater interest is how well the

gradient correction technique proposed

a = 0 K/m (Eq. 33)

in section II actually works when

applied to the convective heat transfer

6000

a = 0 K/m (Inferred)

problem illustrated in figure 2 with

a = 173 K/m (Eq. 33)

boundary conditions described earlier

a = 173 K/m (Inferred)

in this section. This is assessed by

using Eq. (33) to generate the

5500

temperature-time history of a point 1.9

mm below the surface. Then, this

temperature-time history is used to

5000

infer the surface heat flux using the

method of section II, with N = 5.

Finally, the inferred heat flux (dashed

4

5

6

7

8

9

lines) is compared to the original or

actual analytical solution for the heat

Time (s)

flux (solid lines) in Fig. 6. The Figure 6. Effect of gradient correction on inferred surface heat flux.

comparison is made for two cases: one

with a uniform initial wall temperature and one with an initial wall temperature gradient. The ripple in the inferred

heat flux is an artifact of the fitting process. Figure 7 shows that the errors (or differences) in both cases are +/- 2%.

The fact that both curves lie on top of each other demonstrates that the gradient correction technique from section II

has removed any errors arising from the initial gradient. Finally, Fig. 9 compares the surface temperature predicted

using Eq. (33) to that inferred from the temperature-time history of the subsurface point. These results also

demonstrate the validity of the gradient correction technique.

10

15

10000

8

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

333

4

3

a = 0 K/m

a = 173 K/m

% Error

2

1

0

-1

-2

-3

332

0 K/m (Inferred)

173 K/m (Eq. 33)

173 K/m (Inferred)

331

330

329

a=

a=

a=

a=

6

7

8

9

Time (s)

Figure 7. Errors in inferred surface heat flux

7

8

9

Time (s)

Figure 8. Comparison of surface temperatures

predicted using Eq. (33) and inferred from the

subsurface temperature-time measurements.

VI. Conclusion

This paper has shown that not accounting for initial wall temperature gradients that can be encountered in

actively heated or cooled walls can lead to significant (>5%) errors in surface heat flux measurements. A data

interpretation method capable of reducing these errors is described. A solution for the temporal evolution of the

internal temperature distribution of a semi-infinite solid with an initial linear temperature gradient undergoing

convective heat transfer at its surface is also presented. It is hoped that the data interpretation method and the

analytical solution presented here will be helpful in assessing errors and therefore lead to improved measurements of

surface temperature and heat flux.

Acknowledgments

This work was sponsored by NASA Constellation University Institutes Project under grant NCC3-989.

Appreciation is expressed to Claudia Meyer of the NASA Glenn Research Center, and Kevin Tucker and Joseph H.

Ruf of the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center.

References

1

Diller, T.E., Advances in Heat Flux Measurements, Advances in Heat Transfer, volume 23, 1993.

Schultz, D.L. and Jones, T.V., Heat Transfer Measurements in Short-Duration Hypersonic Facilities, AGARD Report,

AGARD-AG-165, 1973.

3

Beck, J.V., Calculation of Surface Heat Flux from an Internal Temperature History, ASME Paper 62-HT-46, 1968.

4

Chen, C.J. and Thomsen, D.M., On Determination of Transient Surface Temperature and Heat Flux by Imbedded

Thermocouple in a Hollow Cylinder, AIAA Journal, vol. 13, no. 5, 1975, pp. 697 699.

5

Imber, M. and Khan, J., Prediction of Transient Temperature Distributions with Embedded Thermocouples, AIAA Journal,

vol. 10, no. 6, 1972, pp. 784 789.

6

Beck, J.V., Blackwell, B., and Haji-Sheikh, A., Comparison of Some Inverse Heat Conduction Methods using

Experimental Data, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 39, no. 17, 1996, pp. 3649 3657.

7

Chen, C.J. and Chiou, J.S., Prediction of Surface Temperature and Heat Flux from an Interior Temperature Response,

Letters in Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 3, 1976, pp. 539 548.

8

Monde, M., Analytical Method in Inverse Heat Transfer Problem using Laplace Transform Technique, International

Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 43, 2000, pp. 3965 3975.

9

Ozisik, M.N. and Orlande, H.R.B., Inverse Heat Transfer, Taylor & Francis, 2000.

10

Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I.A., Handbook of Mathematical Functions, National Bureau of Standards, Applied

Mathematics Series, 7th Ed., May 1968, pp. 300.

11

Carslaw, H.S. and Jaeger, J.C., Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd Edition, Oxford University Press, 1959, pp. 70-73.

12

Yan, X. T., On the Penetration Depth in Fourier Heat Conduction, 8th AIAA/ASME Joint Thermophysics and Heat

Transfer Conference, 24-26 June, 2002, St. Louis, Missouri.

2

9

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

- Clothing Comfort Determining FactorsUploaded byDr Muhammad Mushtaq Mangat
- Lecture 3 hvacUploaded byJohn Bennett
- 02.2 Temperature FVUploaded byjovanivan
- TIPO-Q101-CA_Manual_Spanish_.pdfUploaded byAriel
- SANS10160-7Uploaded byMustufa F Kanjeta
- Unsteady HTUploaded byRajkumar Arumugam
- Heat Exchanger and Fin Fan Cooler-FinalUploaded bygabisa
- 96 Strip Paper PostUploaded byYeison Maldonado
- ScriptUploaded byÐào Quân
- On the Design of Thermal BreathingUploaded byLizbeth Fiallos Avila
- ES 183 Syllabus Jan 2017.pdfUploaded byNameoftheDoctor
- ThermodynamicsUploaded bydebashishota4417
- Us 4626387Uploaded byKailas Nimbalkar
- Tutorial 3 (ME 206)Uploaded bydeshraj
- Basic Energy ConceptsUploaded byMayank Burman
- Thermal Characteristics of Louvered Fins With Low Re Number FlowUploaded byAB Devilier
- Ch+24+Thermal+Questions+-+KEY.pdfUploaded byShe Dil
- Chap 02.pdfUploaded bySergio
- LearningUploaded bynidyarl
- V002T08A018-IPC2000-257Uploaded bymatrix69
- S130-15Uploaded byfaisalmurad
- o Apendice AUploaded byelena lopez alba
- Fidan2011Uploaded byesraates44
- ME 491 Guatemala Solar Dehydrator Report CoverUploaded bymiren
- steam generatorUploaded byFrancesco Cordella
- Handbook- Thermodynamics, Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow - Volume 2 of 3Uploaded byashcoft
- aaaUploaded byEliyana
- ME3132PreLabQuizLumpedCapacityUploaded bymhf394
- Tema 2 EnergíaUploaded byJuan Esteban Bedoya
- thermodynamical analysis of human thermal comfortUploaded byJoseph Venegas

- 759051Uploaded byLajir Luriahk
- gustar and verbs like gustar - notes and worksheetUploaded byapi-303668925
- auyeung2009eqsqUploaded byPancha Iab
- Road Relay 4Uploaded byugruposandres
- MCCDUploaded byanc91
- Clermont FinalUploaded bylbaker2009
- QIMP14 Doctors DirectoryUploaded byShahriar Mostafa
- 02469 Analysis of Heat Transfer and Phase Change in Laser-Assisted Direct Imprinting ProcessesUploaded byManolis Petrakakis
- Lecture Notes 3(1)Uploaded byJonathan Tran
- ANM-Manual HIVAIDS.pdfUploaded byhemihema
- Tsm 6.1 Technical Guide DraftUploaded bybkumar1979
- C.V. AnkurUploaded byjaisaibabaki
- Acquisition of PragmaticsUploaded byNguyễn Thị Cúc Hồng
- practicum 6 lesson planUploaded byapi-259465724
- Assignment - Project Development and Implementation for Strategic ManagersUploaded byfms162
- close read- letter to albert hodgesUploaded byapi-325753641
- ira literary analysis pre-writingUploaded byapi-252344608
- Andre Malraux.pdfUploaded byMarko Bogdanović
- Managing Risk EpidUploaded byjparanoti
- My Thanksgiving Prayer by Crystal Bowman, Full BookUploaded byZondervan
- Ontap Sim 8.1 MaximizationUploaded byPuddin Tame
- Introduction to Project ManagementUploaded byNelsonMoseM
- Sap Basis Administration HandbookUploaded byblackgoldboy
- fce_use_of_english_part_4Uploaded byJudey Lufc Pymto
- An Improved Accelerated Frame Slotted ALOHA (AFSA) Algorithm for Tag Collision in RFIDUploaded byijmnct
- B. S. Mardhekar, A Modern Marathi PoetUploaded bycha072
- fucking sisters hot friendUploaded bygoudtsri
- Nuclear Imaging, nephro emphasisUploaded bybonziebuddy
- I-cliqq v1.0 ManualUploaded byCésar Lópcam
- Accounting for Business CombinationsUploaded byarakeel