What part of the R v Smith [SCC] decision don't you get?

Since then, under our common law application of commerce, the CDSA holds
'no jurisdiction' over the growing, selling and using any form of medical cannabis
This means all those BCSC medical case law precedents that growers won
that enable them to provide the existing medical dispensaries are legal, and
the dispensaries can provide members with cannabis, who claim to benefit for
all kinds of ailments because we're no longer under the control of the CDSA

We ask: Why would any grower and/ dispensary [especially]

want to subscribe to this new Licensing of recreational cannabis?
When it means you actually are saying you don't want this totally
legal avenue that the SCC just gave us, because you choose to
continue to be under Maritime jurisdiction, where all those new
CDSA rules & regulations apply. The city's solution is a trap.
Wake up and accept THAT: The CDSA, the city and its police
are all under Maritime jurisdiction, and as long as you operate
under common law, no Maritime authority can enforce any
regulations on anyone who is operating a grow-op or dispensary as a common law EDA agency
BECAUSE they hold no jurisdiction to shut down any dispensary /EDA agency for being too
close to a school, [for example] or pay their fees, because we don't need an occupational license
This no occupational license is there to bar any Maritime authority from obstructing our political
guarantees, of Freedom of Expression of our Federal EDA agencies when upholding our RUBRIC
Their plan /trap is to get you to subscribe to being under their new City
regulations that comply with any new Federal Court's regulations, AND
that means you actually agree to comply with every new rule they're soon
to implement. By simply applying to proceed with the next step in getting
a Licence, means you are permitting them to charge you for not complying
with a notice to shut down, or take you to Federal Court if you refuse to
shut down, for a basic excuse of not qualifying to get thru the next step in
getting a License. They admit that 70% of the dispensaries will be closed,
when they can't shut down any dispensary that becomes an EDA agency.
The only way to reclaim our BCSC case law rights to grow /dispense cannabis
is by standing-under our Marijuana Party EDA 'no jurisdiction' defence
The Crown prosecutors are saying that in order to comply with new regulations,
set by the Harper regime, we have to go Federal Court, when charged with
growing /trafficking cannabis, where your chances of winning are slim to none.
By properly operating your grow-op or dispensary as a Marijuana Party EDA agency,
means you really can legal to do so under a BC case law, FURTHERMORE you can't be
dragged into a Federal Court, because the CDSA is of no force or effect when standing
under our common law right to Freedom of Contract, because the Crown is directly
prohibited from taking any of our Federal EDA agents or members to a Federal Maritime Court
because we're under common law. This does not mean we are immune from being charged,
it just means, any of our members or agents get go to BCSC, where your chances of winning are
very good, because none of their arbitrary rules that violate BCSC rulings simply don't apply to us.
BOTTOM LINE: We're not the lawless ones for insisting that BCSC case law is Supreme.

AGAIN WE ASK: [the CDSA has always abused the old MMAR program]
Why would you accept their offer to go back and try working with their new set
of arbitrary Maritime rules? Wake-up! they're only making you an offer.
ON THIS: They're correct to say that if you do nothing that they will shut you
down, and frankly they are not going to tell you how to get around their trap.
By subscribing to this Federal racket, you are waving your right to have
your charges heard in the BCSC. Why do that when we're offering you a much better choice?

All we're doing is making an offer that's a win - win - win for everyone
It's a BIG WIN for especially the grower According to BCSC case law, a grower can
sell their excess crop to a dispensary in order to provide for the needs of others AND
by becoming an EDA agent you actually never lost any rights given in our BCSC /SCC
case law victories that we won under the old program. BECAUSE we go to the BCSC
where those Federal rules are meaningless, when they trample on our case law rights.
So why would you not sign up as an EDA agency, when it means you're protected by
'what is prescribed by law' [Sec 1 Charter - R v Therens]? Why would you not stand
under our Sec 1 Charter guarantee of a Free and Democratic society [R v Oakes]?
Frankly, the only way to be grandfathered into preserving your BCSC right to operate a grow-op that
provides any dispensary is for both the grower and the dispensary to become EDA agents /agencies.
For 70% of the dispensaries, you can't loose by becoming an EDA agency
because by definition the City cannot shut you down, for any zoning violations;
Think of the money you'll save: you do not have to pay them that $30,000
yearly Licence fee, and if you do choose that trap, then you'll have to pay for all
those new inspection fees and expensive upgrades those City officials will impose,
because the Federal program insists on this security, and they can charge you with any
new crime under their rules because you choose to pay this GST tax to the Feds, which
will force you to sell $500. ounces because of the heavy fees that apply with being in their program.
By subscribing to our EDA agency, we're not forced to follow those Maritime rules
and regulations that don't comply with BCSC case law LIKE: [1] you can bake and
sell all the cookies and creams you want, [2] you can run a smoking /dabber lounge,
[3] you don't have to follow their labelling requirements, [4] you don't have to sell
their irradiate cannabis, [5] and you can sell at half their price, and make more profit
because the Federal Crown claims that 'affordability' is strictly a provincial matter.

We ask: Why would anyone want to join their new Federal controlled program?
[1] when it takes away every favourable cannabis ruling that the BCSC ever gave us?
[2] where you agree to face criminal charges in Federal Court, if you refuse to comply
Why anyone would want to surrender their authority and give the CDSA another
chance simply defies any logic, when all you have to do to bail out of their trap, is to
sign a few of their forms. AND then restructure your operation to be a registered EDA
agency, where all of the CDSA or City's arbitrary rules are of no effect, in the BCSC
FOR DETAILED INFO on how easy it is to do this transfer from being just a grower /dispenser,
into becoming a common law EDA agency, just call us @ 778-707-7461 for an appointment