You are on page 1of 8

Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: ERNESTO M. FOGATA


Position: PRINCIPAL I
Review Period: JANUARY 2015 - DECEMBER 2015

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

ZENIA G. MOSTOLES
SCHOOLS DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT
NOVEMBER 2015

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION/SAN AGUSTIN HS/DIVISION OF ZAMBALES

MFOs

Improved School
Promotion and
Graduation Rate;
improved students
academic
performance and
acceptable GSA;
Zero Dropout Rate

KRAs

1. Instructional
Leadership

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING


Weight
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE per KRA

Performed
instructional
supervision to
achieve learning

JANUARY 2015

to

15%

DECEMBER

2015

outcomes

10%
Performed

databased strategic
planning

Page 1 of 3

TO BE FILLED DURING EVA


ACTUAL RESULTS

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
-Conducted fourten (14) instructional supervisions/class
observations per month to achieve desired learning outcomes ;
-Developed standards for outstanding teacher and studentl
performance
Inspected/checked daily lesson plans/logs of 14 out of 14 teachers
weekly
-organizes appopriate class programs, ADM, flexible learning
options as stop-gap measures; consolidates reports on learning
difficulties, home visitations and peculiar incidents used for
planning and implementing apppropriate interventions
5-100% accomplishment of targets
4- Only 90-99% is evident
3-Lacking 1 indicator
2-Lacking 2indicators
1-Indicators not evident

-Produced a school strategic plan/SIP and AIP through the strategic


planning process conduct of school situational analysis, SWOT,
determining strategies through prioritizing strategic options,
resource and facilities planning and formulation of PAPs based on
analyses
-Strategic Plan was based on Deped vision, contextualized in school
vision and mission-all school stakeholders were engaged in the
strategic planning process
-M&E for process and outcomes checkpoints were developed and
utilized
5-100% accomplishment of school targets (with evidence contained
in school report card-School report card presented to all
stakeholders
4- Only 90-99% is evident
3-Lacking 1 indicator
2-Lacking 2indicators
1-Indicators not evident

DepEd RPMS Form for Scho

Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (OPCRF)


Name of Employee: ERNESTO M. FOGATA
Position: PRINCIPAL I
Review Period: JUNE 2015 - DECEMBER 2015

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

ZENIA G. MOSTOLES
SCHOOLS DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT
NOVEMBER 2015

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION/SAN AGUSTIN HS/DIVISION OF ZAMBALES

MFOs

KRAs

Safe and child


friendly learning
and school
environment

2. Learning
Environment

Technical
Assistance/Instruct
ional Supervision

3. Human
Resource
Management
and
Development

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING


Weight
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE per KRA
Provided

safe and
child friendly
learning and school
environment for
students/learners

Provided

technical
assistance to
teachers on matters
pertaining to
enhancement of
classroom
management, skills
and instructional
competence and to
non-teaching
personnel for
support services
within the RPMS
cycle

JANUARY

2015 to

30%

DECEMBER

2015

5%

TO BE FILLED DURING EVA


ACTUAL RESULTS

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
5- 100% accomplishments on the following (supported by
evidence such as school policy, reports,information materials,
advocacy activities, regular meetings, inventory). Adhered to ChildFriendly environment standards and Programs-Institutionalized child
protection mechanisms and processes (per Deped Order 40, s.
2012)
-Provided ICT facilities/workshop rooms as learning support
systems, Has clear DRRM mobilization plans
4- Only 90-99% is evident
3-Lacking 1 indicator
2-Lacking 2indicators
1-Indicators not evident

-All teachers provided with technical assistance with corresponding


evidences:
- teacher portfolio containing observation reports, TSNA results,
performance analysis and recommendations for development
interventions, performance contracts, and performance evaluation
results in prescribed tools
Performed RPMS processes among all school personnel with the
following as evidences:
-performance contracts, and
-performance evaluation results in
prescribed tools and proposed
development plans
5-100% all indicators are evident
4- Only 90-99% is evident
3-Lacking 1 indicator
2-Lacking 2indicators
1-Indicators not evident

Page 2 of 3

DepEd RPMS Form for Scho

Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (OPCRF)


Name of Employee: ERNESTO M. FOGATA
Position: PRINCIPAL I
Review Period: JUNE 2015 - DECEMBER 2015

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

ZENIA G. MOSTOLES
SCHOOLS DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT
NOVEMBER 2015

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION/SAN AGUSTIN HS/DIVISION OF ZAMBALES

MFOs

Stakeholders
partnership and
mobilization plan
(PTA sponsored
projects/events)

SIP/AIP

KRAs

4. Parents
Involvement and
Community
Partnership

5. School
Leadership,
Management
and Operations

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING


Weight
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE per KRA

Established school
and family and
community
partnership for
performance

JANUARY

2015 to

25%

DECEMBER

2015

Performed school
leadership,
management and
operations functions

15%

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
5- Has 100% stakeholders partnership/mobilization plan
(complete with reports and documentations of meetings,
agreements)
-Organized programs with stakeholders, esp. parents for
academic and other purposes (esp. Strategic planning)
-Obtained resources for the school through stakeholders
partnership
4- Only 90-99% is evident
3-Lacking 1 indicator
2-Lacking 2indicators
1-Indicators not evident

5-With clear financial management system for the school


supported by evidences such as reports, account logs,
database sytem; Allocated/Prioritized funds for programs
and school facilities improvement and maintenance;
monitored, accounted and reported utilization of school fund
Reported sources and uses of funds
Ensured quality standards for facilities given to the school
Coordinated with stakeholders on resource mobilization
Maintained school EBEIS/LIS/EMIS and regularly submit
reports to the Division Office
4- Only 90-99% is evident
3-Lacking 1 indicator
2-Lacking 2indicators
1-Indicators not evident

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned


ERNESTO M. FOGATA

TO BE FILLED DURING EVA


ACTUAL

OVER-ALL RATING FOR


ACCOMPLISHMENTS
ZENIA G. MOSTOLES, Ed. D.

Rater

Ratee
Page 3 of 3

DepEd RPMS Form for Scho

LED DURING EVALUATION


ESULTS
RATING SCORE
AVG

S Form for School Principals

LED DURING EVALUATION


ESULTS
RATING SCORE
AVG

S Form for School Principals

LED DURING EVALUATION


AL
RATING SCORE
AVG

ATING FOR
HMENTS

S Form for School Principals