This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
MY EXTENSIVE PERSONAL ATTEMPTS TO INJECT REAL AND VALUABLE EVIDENCE INTO THE INVESTIGATIVE PROCESS WAS INTENTIONALLY THWARTED AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY BY AGGRESSIVE STONEWALLING AT MANY LEVELS FROM NIST UP TO AND INCLUDING THE CONGRESSIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE! MY PERSONAL TESTIMINY FOLLOWS!!
WHOM IT MAY CONCERN WTC7 NIST STONEWALLING OF INESTIGATIVE EVIDENCE
The following account presents my personal and repeated attempts to input valid evidence into an ongoing federal investigation concerning the destruction of WTC7 on 11Sep2001 (5:23 PM EST). A timeline is presented first with internal hyperlinks to assist in navigation through this document and external hyperlinks to assist in the understanding of actual evidence presented. The unprofessionalism and use of innovative techniques to thwart communication and keep real testimony and scientific evidence out of the preconceived and anti-scientific NIST findings are nothing less than criminal. I personally made every attempt to be polite, professional, appreciative, ethical, prompt, and patient so as to provide every possible opportunity for professional investigative responses in return. There were none of these. The only thing I would not do was go away, which is the one thing an illegal operation does not want and, as is shown, cannot accept! As an overview to this testimony, my personal and direct involvement with the investigation began with the NIST 29Jun07 public request for information and evidence on the destruction of WTC7. This public request, combined with irrefutable evidence I possessed, drove me to proceed through a significant series of emails (ignored) and phone calls (unreturned) to NIST, followed by a personal visit to NIST (which was ended abruptly by armed security), followed by emails and phone calls to DOJ and US Fire Administration as the next higher in the chain of responsibility per HR 4687 (the Congressional mandate for NIST investigation of 911). Upon those actions also getting no real attention or action, I next emailed, phoned, and subsequently personally visited the Congressional Oversight Committee responsible for NIST. The one thing all of these organizations had in common was an adamant ability to deny access and to emphatically obstruct any and all attempts to meaningfully address accurate information!! Their seemingly coordinated theme was that there was either nothing I was presenting that applied to 911, or that the information was obviously something they had already seen. My direct involvement in the NIST, DOJ, Congressional Science and Technology Oversight Committee investigation into the destruction of WTC7 on 11Sep01 ended with nothing but silence from all official investigative authorities. A total and complete lack of response to all requests to input, track, evaluate, and actually address any evidence I presented was the agenda. This total abuse of power resulted in an unbreachable stonewall at my every attempt to ensure legal oversight, THIS ENTIRE INVESTIGATION IS A WHITEWASH!! All information presented here is accurate and true to the best of my knowledge and capability to ensure so! <signed> Guy S. Razer, LtCol, USAF (Ret.)
Mr Lande, I was in your DC office yesterday and one of the staffers said I should send you this email trail. The ongoing NIST investigation is pitiful, unprofessional and in need of immediate oversight. I am prepared to testify in front of your committee at any time. I spent a lot of time, energy, and money attempting to input evidence into an ongoing federal investigation of significant importance to the future of our nation. I was repeatedly ignored, stonewalled, lied to, and finally threatened by their security with "a visit". This treatment finally drove me to go to NIST in person to speak face to face with the lead investigator. Not only would he not allow me to meet with him, he called me on the phone (which was the first and only time I spoke with any NIST investigator despite repeated and exhaustive attempts) at the visitors center and kept me on the phone until the chief of security and his lieutenant appeared to ensure my swift departure. He told me the investigation was virtually over (whatever that means) and all evidence I had given to his office he had seen before which is virtually impossible since some of the last evidence sent had release dates only days or hours prior to my sending it to him. The first document below is the first public statement the the WTC7 NIST investigation was ongoing and lacking evidence, which started my active participation. Following that is the email trail in chronological order to NIST. Interspersed with these emails were many phone calls, always to voicemail and never ever returned.
NIST Status Update on World Trade Center 7 Investigation
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: June 29, 2007 CONTACT: Michael E. Newman (301) 975-3025 firstname.lastname@example.org
A team of scientists and engineers at the Commerce Department's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) that is investigating the collapse of New York City's World Trade Center 7 (WTC 7) building expects to release its draft report for public comment by the end of the year. WTC 7 was a 47-story office building adjacent to the WTC towers (WTC 1 and 2) that collapsed following the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. WTC 7 collapsed later that afternoon. NIST's investigation of WTC 7 includes an extremely complex analysis that incorporates detailed information about the building's structure and construction, as well as data about fires, damage sustained from falling WTC 1 debris and other technical factors to determine its probable collapse sequence. "We are proceeding as quickly as possible while rigorously testing and evaluating a wide range of scenarios to reach the most definitive conclusion possible," said Shyam Sunder, WTC lead investigator for NIST. "The WTC 7 investigation is in some respects just as challenging, if not more so, than the study of the towers. However, the current study does benefit greatly from the significant technological advances achieved and lessons learned from our work on the towers." The NIST investigation team initially worked simultaneously on both the WTC towers and WTC 7 collapses. In June 2004, the team shifted to full-time study of the towers to develop needed simulation methods and other research tools and to expedite completion of the WTC towers
report. Work resumed on the WTC 7 study in October 2005. The current NIST working collapse hypothesis for WTC 7 is described in the June 2004 Progress Report on the Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster (Volume 1, page 17, as well as Appendix L), as follows: An initial local failure occurred at the lower floors (below floor 13) of the building due to fire and/or debris induced structural damage of a critical column (the initiating event) which supported a large span floor bay with an area of about 2,000 square feet; Vertical progression of the initial local failure occurred up to the east penthouse, as the large floor bays were unable to redistribute the loads, bringing down the interior structure below the east penthouse; and Horizontal progression of the failure across the lower floors (in the region of floors 5 and 7, that were much thicker than the rest of the floors), triggered by damage due to the vertical failure, resulting in a disproportionate collapse of the entire structure. This hypothesis may be supported or modified, or new hypotheses may be developed, through the course of the continuing investigation. NIST also is considering whether hypothetical blast events could have played a role in initiating the collapse. While NIST has found no
evidence of a blast or controlled demolition event, NIST would like to
determine the magnitude of hypothetical blast scenarios that could have led to the structural failure of one or more critical elements. Updated information with the specific date for the public release of the NIST team's draft report will be posted on the WTC investigation Web site, http://wtc.nist.gov.
MY FRIST EMAIL TO NIST 9JUL2007
Hello Mr. Newman, My name is Guy Razer, 20 year veteran US Air Force fighter pilot and weapons/demolition expert. It seems your pursuit of evidence pointing to controlled demolition of Building 7 has left you somewhat empty handed, sooo...I thought I would lend you a hand as my 4+ years of research has overfilled my hands and my computer with irrefutable evidence that Building 7 was a preplanned and controlled demolition. This is just a small sampling of valid evidence I have, and I am very interested in how to log this information into your investigation process so that the evidence does not fall through the proverbial crack. Our nation and the survivors of those killed and wounded, either in the initial attacks or during first response, are entitled to an accurate and unbiased investigation. You are in a rather precarious position, because it is obvious that the powers that be need a false story to cover their false flag operation, and they have chosen you to do it. The problem with that is the fact that we are not only watching, but actively participating to ensure some accuracy in this report. This is not about money, as there is no statute of limitations on murder and one who covers for murder can be tried as an accomplice to murder, after the fact!! So, please be very careful about how you handle the evidence I present to you and make sure nothing slips through the cracks! I will be following this e-mail up with a phone call later today to ensure you received it and maybe we can talk a bit about follow on evidence and how it should be logged in and handled. BBC Either Prophetic or In A Time Warp? BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell 911 Truth: What Happened to Building 7?
A Bit of Info on Kerosene and Steel (PS No Airplane Hit Bldg. 7...I just melted into its own footprint at freefall speeds...yeah, right!)
Did you happen to see the photo of the damage 8600 gallons of gasoline exploding and burning causes?? See any powderized concrete???? Dozens of burned cars???? Ejected material blocks away? Gasoline burns much much hotter than jet fuel (Kerosene). In the
hijacked planes, there was @ 15,000 gallons of kerosene at takeoff. Figure they burned up 10% on takeoff and flying. 13,500. Figure at least 50% of the remaining fuel exploded on impact. That is a low estimate, in my opinion. 6750 explodes, 6750 burns. Now, look at this overpass. I have welded the 3" rebar that reinforces the concrete on these California overpasses, certified double butt welds, with 9018 low hydrogen electrodes, rebar preheated to 250F. I am unaware of what "steel beams" they allude to, unless it is embedded in the concrete column supporting the roadbed. But, it is their story, let them tell it. I have many many times passed over this very section of freeway. I used to work in Hayward, 10 minutes down the freeway. This section is less than 3 stories tall. The concrete did not powderize. The steel did not melt. The asphalt, which is made of petroleum products, simply melted and swayed, not powderized, not burned and gone. The story states the "steel beams buckled" and the bolts holding them "melted." Collapsed. In Place. All the pieces still there, except these "bolts." No hole in the ground, even though THIS explosion and fire was at GROUND LEVEL. The article also states definitively that the temperatures reached 2750F. HOW they KNOW this is beyond me, unless they are stating gasoline burns at 2750 degrees, but also stating steel doesn't melt then. NOW YOU GET MY POINT???????? If steel beams here in California didn't disappear and powderize to nothing at OFFICIALLY GIVEN TEMP of 2750 with gasoline, like at the WTC Tower's core beams did, HOW IN THE HELL did KEROSENE POWDERIZE CONCRETE AT 675F maximum temperatures?????? Especially given the fact the jet fuel only burned the TOP FLOORS???? Read the article by the Danish Professor of Chemistry. Kerosene burns at 675F. Officially now (facts given by authorities), California has stated gasoline can't melt steel, only cause it to turn PLASTIC UNDER EXTREME HEAT.
If the official 911 story had ANY credibility, the towers should have looked like elongated pretzels. Twisted steel.
A Bit of Info on Explosions!!
There were multiple explosions inside the Twin Towers on 9/11 before they collapsed... Police reported them. Firemen reported them. People on the street reported them. Even network news anchors reported them. Later that day, the reports stopped. And they were never repeated by the mainsteam news again. Thanks to the magic of VCRs that were recording live news feeds all day, here are the explosions that the news media made go away... Here is incontrovertible proof:
Please, watch this 10-minute clip. Then ask yourself: Were all these people hallucinating? Were they all lying? Or have you been conned? Wake up! You've been lied to en masse! And An Eye Witness in Bldg 7 Transcript of Interview Describing Explosions!! WTC 7 Eyewitness Testimony Transcribed by Rolf Lindgren (edited for clarity with notes) Sources: http://www.prisonplanet.com/audio/190607clips2.mp3 http://184.108.40.206/Archives2/Jun2007/gwrpt1erT/0619071.mp3 http://220.127.116.11/Archives2/Jun2007/gwrpt1erT/0619072.mp3
[Start of transcript] "I was asked to go and man the Office of Emergency Management [OEM] at the World Trade Center 7, on the 23rd floor. [This was immediately after the North Tower was struck. OEM is also know as Rudy's Bunker.] As I arrived there, there were police all over the lobby. They showed me the way to the elevator; we got up to the 23rd floor. We couldn't get in; we had to go back down. [The witness was with another person.] Then security and police took us to the freight elevators where they took us back up and we did get in. Upon arriving into the OEMEOC [OEM Emergency Operating Center], we noticed that everybody was gone. [The witness's voice inflection indicates elevated surprise. It seems he has arrived before the official evacuation time of 9:30 AM] I saw coffee that was on the desks still, the smoke was still coming off the coffee. I saw half-eaten sandwiches. And after I called several individuals, one individual told me to leave and to leave right away. [Could indicate foreknowledge] I came running back in. He said we're the only ones up here. We gotta get out of here. He found the stairwell. So we subsequently went to the stairwell and we're going down the stairs. When we reached the 6th floor, the landing that we were standing on gave way, there was an explosion and the landing gave way. [The witness's timeline places this event well before the collapse of either Twin Tower.] I was left there hanging. I had to climb back up, and now I had to walk back up to the 8th floor.
After getting to the 8th floor everything was dark." [However, according to FEMA maps, none of the South Tower debris, excepting dust clouds, reached Building 7. (Source: http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch1.pdf, esp. p. 9). The North Tower did not collapse until 10:28 A.M., far too late to fit into the witness' timeline.] "As I told you earlier, both buildings were still standing. Because I looked to, I looked one way, looked the other way, there's nothing there. When I got to the 6th floor before all this happened, I got to the 6th floor, there was an explosion, that's what forced us back to the 8th floor, both buildings were still standing." [The above two paragraphs were obtained from another source not listed above. For this source, please contact the Scholars.] …. "Well, I'm just confused about one thing and one thing only, why World Trade Center 7 went down in the first place? I'm very confused about that. I know what I heard; I heard explosions. The explanation I got was it was the fuel oil tank. I'm an old boiler guy. If it was the fuel oil tank, it would have been one side of the building. When I got to that lobby, the lobby was totally destroyed. It looked like King Kong had came through and stepped on it. And it was so destroyed I didn't know where I was. And it was so destroyed that they had to take me out through a hole in the wall. A makeshift hole that I believe that the fire department made to get me out." [The damage to the lobby may have been related to the earlier explosion or possibly be related to the destruction of the North Tower, a point that will be resolved when the entire tape is released.] …. "And it wasn't until some years later that I testified in front of them [9/11 Commission or NIST]. It was very scary because they looked like very important people; they were questioning me about certain things.
I don't know if they liked the answers I gave, I could care less, I gave what, my account of it, the truth, and that was that. I thought they were just doing an interim report or investigation on as to what happened. They got my point of view. I haven't heard any more from them."
MY SECOND EMAIL TO NIST 9JUL07
(After many phone calls, the last one of which was to public affairs who told me he would be back on 9Jul07)
Mr Newman, Hope you had a nice bit of annual vacation... 9/11 Videos: THE CONTROLLED COLLAPSE OF WTC 7 ..> ..>
..> ..> WMV video of the above
collapse (412kB) High quality slo-mo zoom of above (1.4 MB)..>
Take a close look at the manner in which WTC 7 collapses straight down. For the building to collapse in this fashion, all of the load bearing supports would have had to fail at exactly the same time. The claim that the collapse was the result of a fire requires the fire be equally distributed throughout the entire floor of the building, providing equal heat for an equal amount of time, so that all the load bearings members would fail at the exact same moment. Do you find this plausible?..>
..> "Amazing, incredible, pick your word. For the third time today, it's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too much on television before, where a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down." CBS News anchor Dan Rather commenting on the collapse of Building 7 - September 11, 2001 at approx 5:30pm EST...>
WMV video download of above (202kB)
..> When buildings such as WTC 7 are demolished the collapse is initiated by an explosion in the central area of the basement. This causes the building to collapse in on itself and minimizes damage to surrounding structures [full details]. The video enlargement on the right shows part of WTC 7's roof crumbling seconds before the collapse. The only logical reason for this occurrence is the building was rocked by a powerful explosion.
WMV video download of above (213kB)
The following video (screenshot left) compares the collapse of WTC 7 to a controlled demolition. The characteristics and speed of the collapses are all but identical. It is impossible for diesel fires to collapse a building in this manner.
WMV video download (190kB)..>
..> ..> RealMedia video showing evidence of cutter charges in WTC 7's collapse 680KB - to download video right click link and select 'Save Target As'..> ..> ..> ..> ..> ..> ..> ..> ..> Note the highlighted smoke coming from the upper floors (Click images for full size)..>
..> Other video downloads of WTC 7's collapse...
WMV video download of above (194kB)
WMV video download of above (387kB)
WMV video download of above (296kB)
If WTC 7 spontaneously collapsed then how did so many people catch its demise?..>
WMV video download of above (442kB)
showing the building on the right collapsing without explosives (149kB WMV)
..> ..> Click to download a video
..> ..> The photos below are of buildings collapsed by an earthquake. They show the typical result of a single load bearing member failure - the buildings are tipped over onto the initiating point.
..> Click images for full size..> <P>For a building to collapse into its own footprint, as WTC 7 did, ALL of the load bearing members must fail at the exact same moment. This is achieved in controlled demolitions.
Click to download a video showing the controlled demolition of the building on the left (1.2MB MOV)
[Source: Controlled Demolition]..>
..> ..> ..>
..> Larry Silverstein, the controller of the destroyed WTC complex, stated in a PBS ..ary that he
and the FDNY decided jointly to demolish WTC 7 late in the afternoon of September 11, 2001.
The above demonstrates that WTC 7 was indeed demolished, so why did FEMA spend many hours dreaming up a report which claims the building collapsed through fire?..>
WTC7 - THIS IS AN ORANGE
MY THIRD EMAIL TO NIST 10JUL07
My question to you Mr Newman is... How are you going to explain away facts so obvious that to cover them up is in itself an act pure cowardice and deserves severe punishment? As I said in my first communication, you are in a very precarious position indeed!!! A BRIEF STUDY ON TEMPERATURE, STEEL, MELTING, KEROSENE (aka Jet Fuel) AND LARRY SILVERSTIEN'S BUILDINGS (aka WTC 1,2,7) THAT HAVE A TENDANCY TOWARD RATHER EXPLOSIVE COLLAPSE!!
THIS MATERIAL FROM RESEARCH DONE BY DR. ED WARD FOR THE FULL ARCHIVE OF HIS OUTSTANDING RESEARCH GO TO:
The Persistent Hot spots: Thermal images from September 16, 2001 WTC 7 closest to top of image.
More than one month later, October 18, 2001, there are still hot spots at WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7.
Hot Spots from the AVRIS Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) Sensor Sept 16, 2001 indexed A&B are WTC7
Larger 254 KB image
Table 1 Thermal Hot Spot Data (Again, A&B are WTC7) ..> Hot Spot A B C D E F G H Location Temperature Area N Latitude W Longitude (Kelvin) % FOV sq meter o o 40 42' 47.18" 74 00' 41.43" 1000 15 0.56 o o 40 42' 47.14" 74 00' 43.53" 830 2 0.08 40o 42' 42.89" 74o 00' 48.88" 900 20 0.8 o o 40 42' 41.99" 74 00' 46.94" 790 20 0.8 o o 40 42' 40.58" 74 00' 50.15" 710 10 0.4 o o 40 42' 38.74" 74 00' 46.70" 700 10 0.4 o o 40 42' 39.94" 74 00' 45.37" 1020 1 0.04 o o 40 42' 38.60" 74 00' 43.51" 820 2 0.08..>
Positions are in degrees-minutes-decimal seconds, datum WGS84. Position accuracy is estimated to be approximately +/- 6 meters (18 feet).
AND, HOW DO YOU GET A 30' DEEP CRATER UNDER A MELTING BUILDING??? WTC 7 - 47 stories tall - debris pile 7 stories. The New York times has a crude interactive map placing the crater depth at -30 feet. According to the official story, beams from WTC 1 collapsed the building. However, the collapse did not make a debris pile. It made a debris hole.
I TRULY DON'T BELIEVE THESE HEATERS ARE RUNNING A TEMPERATURE EVEN APPROACHING 1000 DEGREES KELVIN (1300+ DEGREES FARENHEIT) DO YOU??? I THINK THE RATHER THIN WIRE MESH AND INEXPERNSIVE METAL ON THESE HEATERS WOULD PROBABLY MELT BEFORE THE WTC BUILDINGS' ASTM E119 UL CERTIFIED STEEL WOULD!!!
(The time temperature curves for the ASTM E119 standard require the samples to be exposed to temperatures around 2000 degrees farenheit for several hours) FULL ARTICLE BELOW...
OH, AND THAT'S RIGHT...NO AIRPLANE HIT WTC 7!!!
UL Executive Speaks Out On WTC Study
911Truth.org 11-14-4 "The buildings should have easily withstood the thermal stress caused by pools of burning jet fuel." From Kevin R. Ryan Site Manager of the Environmental Health Laboratories South Bend, Indiana (Company site - www.ehl.cc) A division of Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. (Company site - www.ul.com) To Frank Gayle Deputy Chief of the Metallurgy Division Material Science and Engineering Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST and the World Trade Center at wtc.nist.gov Dr. Gayle biography wtc.nist.gov/pi/wtc_profiles.asp?lastname=gayle From: Kevin R Ryan/SBN/ULI To: email@example.com Date: 11/11/2004 Dr. Gayle, Having recently reviewed your team's report of 10/19/04, I felt the need to contact you directly. As I'm sure you know, the company I work for certified the steel components used in the construction of the WTC buildings. In requesting information from both our CEO and Fire Protection business manager last year, I learned that they did not agree on the essential aspects of the story, except for one thing - that the samples we certified met all requirements. They suggested we all be patient and understand that UL was
working with your team, and that tests would continue through this year. I'm aware of UL's attempts to help, including performing tests on models of the floor assemblies. But the results of these tests appear to indicate that the buildings should have easily withstood the thermal stress caused by pools of burning jet fuel. There continues to be a number of "experts" making public claims about how the WTC buildings fell. One such person, Dr. Hyman Brown from the WTC construction crew, claims that the buildings collapsed due to fires at 2000F melting the steel (1). He states "What caused the building to collapse is the airplane fuel ? burning at 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit. The steel in that five-floor area melts." Additionally, the newspaper that quotes him says "Just-released preliminary findings from a National Institute of Standards and Technology study of the World Trade Center collapse support Brown's theory." We know that the steel components were certified to ASTM E119. The time temperature curves for this standard require the samples to be exposed to temperatures around 2000F for several hours. And as we all agree, the steel applied met those specifications. Additionally, I think we can all agree that even un-fireproofed steel will not melt until reaching red-hot temperatures of nearly 3000F (2). Why Dr. Brown would imply that 2000F would melt the high-grade steel used in those buildings makes no sense at all. The results of your recently published metallurgical tests seem to clear things up (3), and support your team's August 2003 update as detailed by the Associated Press (4), in which you were ready to "rule out weak steel as a contributing factor in the collapse". The evaluation of paint deformation and spheroidization seem very straightforward, and you noted that the samples available were adequate for the investigation. Your comments suggest that the steel was probably exposed to temperatures of only about 500F (250C), which is what one might expect from a thermodynamic analysis of the situation. However the summary of the new NIST report seems to ignore your findings, as it suggests that these low temperatures caused exposed bits of the building's steel core to "soften and buckle"(5). Additionally this summary states that the perimeter columns softened, yet your findings make clear that "most perimeter panels (157 of 160) saw no temperature above 250C". To soften steel for the purposes of forging, normally temperatures need to be above 1100C (6). However, this new summary report suggests that much lower temperatures were be able to not only soften the steel in a matter of minutes, but lead to rapid structural collapse. This story just does not add up. If steel from those buildings did soften or melt, I?m sure we can all agree that this was certainly not due to jet fuel fires of any kind, let alone the briefly burning fires in those towers. That fact should be of great concern to all Americans. Alternatively, the contention that this steel did fail at temperatures around 250C suggests that the majority of deaths on 9/11 were due to a safety-related failure. That suggestion should be of great concern to my company. There is no question that the events of 9/11 are the emotional driving force behind the War on Terror. And the issue of the WTC collapse is at the crux of the story of 9/11.
My feeling is that your metallurgical tests are at the crux of the crux of the crux. Either you can make sense of what really happened to those buildings, and communicate this quickly, or we all face the same destruction and despair that come from global decisions based on disinformation and "chatter". Thanks for your efforts to determine what happened on that day. You may know that there are a number of other current and former government employees that have risked a great deal to help us to know the truth. I've copied one of these people on this message as a sign of respect and support. I believe your work could also be a nucleus of fact around which the truth, and thereby global peace and justice, can grow again. Please do what you can to quickly eliminate the confusion regarding the ability of jet fuel fires to soften or melt structural steel. 1. http://www.boulderweekly.com/archive/102104/coverstory.html 2. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 61st edition, pg D-187 3. http://wtc.nist.gov/media/P3MechanicalandMetAnalysisofSteel.pdf 4. http://www.voicesofsept11.org/archive/911ic/082703.php 5. http://wtc.nist.gov/media/NCSTACWTCStatusFINAL101904WEB2.pdf (pg 11) 6. http://www.forging.org/FIERF/pdf/ffaaMacSleyne.pdf Kevin Ryan Site Manager Environmental Health Laboratories [Note: The letter is followed in the e-mail by a standard UL message footer] -- For more information about UL, its Marks, and its services for EMC, quality registrations and product certifications for global markets, please access our web sites at http://www.ul.com and http://www.ulc.ca, or contact your local sales representative. November 12: An executive of the company that certified the steel used in the construction of the World Trade Center has questioned the common theory that fuel fires caused its collapse, in a letter yesterday to the head of the government team that has spent two years studying how the trade center was built and why it fell. The author of the letter, Kevin Ryan, is site manager at Environmental Health Laboratories in South Bend, Indiana, a division of Underwriters Laboratories, the product-compliance and testing giant. Because UL certified the WTC steel for its ability to withstand fires, its performance on September 11 is obviously of concern to the company. Ryan sent his letter to Frank Gayle, deputy chief of the Metallurgy Division at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). He later forwarded it in an email to David Ray Griffin, author of the New Pearl Harbor, and Catherine Austin Fitts, who is a member of the 911Truth.org board. Griffin asked for and received permission to forward the letter for Web distribution. 911Truth.org called Ryan today to confirm his authorship. The letter raises disturbing questions, pointing out that the steel in the towers tested up to its certified standard (i.e., it should have easily withstood the fuel fires without
buckling). A chemist by profession, Ryan said he is acting in the hope of receiving a public response from Gayle. Given the impact of September 11 on events around the world, Ryan said, everyone needs to know the full truth of what really happened on that day. He added that he considers Gayle to be a good scientist and an honest person. A draft of the government agency's final report on the WTC collapse is due in January. The New York Times reports today that the NIST team is planning to hold some of its deliberations in secret. "The announcement has been sharply protested by advocates for families of the 9/11 victims, who said they were considering a lawsuit to force the agency to open the meetings to the public," the Times writes. As the Times notes, the NIST investigation was started in 2002 after lobbying by, among others, the Skyscraper Safety Campaign, an organization created by Monica Gabrielle and Sally Regenhard, both of whom lost family on September 11. Gabrielle told the Times that NIST should have "one job, and one job only - to find out the truth of what happened to those buildings and to report to the public about it. You don't owe industry, the Port Authority or federal agencies anything. You owe it to the public - the truth, no matter where it goes." (See www.nytimes.com) http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041112144051451 - 911Truth.org (nl) Comment From Andrea 11-14-4 On seeing this research from UL, I am pushing for transparent*, fully public meetings/hearings on the structure/physical evidence related to the deterioration of the towers into their foundations -these meetings conducted by the NIST, the gov division under the DeptCommerce, under the Executive Branch, aka - "The White House". Rather than be immutable or mysterious about this research on the (Bethlehem Steel produced) steel in the towers, I found this important information to those who have the interest to understand the truth about what happened at the WTC on 9/11/01. I owned stock in Bethlehem Steel before it was driven into bankruptcy and liquidated. I knew it had made the i-beams and girders for the WTC, and found it annoying when the under-informed would attempt to convince me that we dont/didnt even make steel strong enough to support construction like the towers, and that steel strong enough for construction like the WTC comes/came from Japan. Au contraire! A look at the remaining steel while at the site also speaks otherwise. This government is to answer to the American people. I see no reason for secrecy when the people in the government are looking for 'transparency' from everything else. Our privacy is under invasion and the government wants opaque secrecy? Comment From Scott T Davis 11-14-4 Dear Jeff, I want to ask all Americans - who have just read this article which has such
overwhelming statistical information exposing the World Trade Center cover-up - to take just a minute and e-mail the article to their Senators, Congressional Representatives and all media outlets. All the e-mail information we need to expose the coverup is right on the main page of your web site. We as Americans are held accountable for our actions by government everyday. It's well past time we hold the people we employ to represent us equally as accountable. Scott T Davis
MY FOURTH EMAIL 11Jul07
DEAR NIST INVESTIGATORS, OUR RESEARCH IS AS ACCURATE AS IT IS INEXPENSIVE! A SPECIAL THANKS TO OUR UNPAID INVESTIGATORS!! Proof there was Molten Metal in the basements of the Twin Towers and Building 7 — and why Kerosene could not have been its cause. Jet fuel is nothing more than refined kerosene — the stuff you use in your camping stove without fear of it ever melting the grille. In the case of the Twin Towers, a relatively paltry 10,000 gallons of it is said to have MELTED HUNDREDS OF TONS OF HIGH-GRADE CONSTRUCTION STEEL. While "10,000 gallons" might appear to be a huge amount, in reality it is a relatively miniscule volume: approximately 11'x11'x11' -about the size of just one of the thousands of small cubicles that were peppered throughout the Towers — relatively speaking, a pinprick on these voluminous million-cubic-foot structures. But even that's quite beside the point: Kerosene simply does not
possess the thermodynamic potential to melt steel. Period. No, not even a million gallons of it can. To prove the point, I suggest torching a loaded petroleum tanker out at sea. You'll have a bonfire that would last several days — and still leave a floating steel hull, quite intact, at the end of it.
First, watch this video clip of a NYFD fireman speak of having seen "Streams of molten metal...running like in a foundry":
Then, read the following sample of comments by eyewitnesses at Ground Zero: "Feeling the heat and seeing the molten steel reminded me of a volcano." —Mt. St. Helens volcano disaster veteran Ron Burger, public health advisor at the National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
"There are fires burning and molten steel flowing in the pile of ruins still settling beneath our feet." —Sarah Atlas, Urban Search and Rescue, New Jersey
"...The heat was so intense we encountered rivers of molten steel." —NYFD firefighter, as reported in the New York Post, 3/3/04; also in ..ary film, "The First 24 Hours"
"Fires are still actively burning and the smoke is very intense. In some pockets now being uncovered, they are finding molten steel." —Alison Geyh, PhD, Johns Hopkins' Bloomberg School of Public Health
"...We descended deep below street level to areas where underground fires still burned and steel flowed in molten streams." —A reporter with rare access to the debris at ground zero, quoted in the book, "American Ground: Unbuilding the World Trade Center" by William Langewiesche
"...The streams of molten metal that leaked from the hot cores and flowed down broken walls inside the foundation hole." —The same journalist referred to above, in "American Ground: Unbuilding the World Trade Center" by William Langewiesche
"...A fire truck 10 feet below the ground that was still burning two weeks after the Tower collapsed. Its metal was so hot that it looked like a vat of molten steel." —Vance Deisingnore, OSHA Officer at WTC, to Jim McKay, Post-Gazette Staff Writer, on September 11, 2002
"...A combination of an uncontrolled fire and the structural damage might have been able to bring the building down, but that would not explain steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been PARTLY EVAPORATED in extraordinarily high temperatures" —A fire safety expert, about World Trade Center building 7. NB: Evaporation means conversion from a liquid to a gas; so the steel beams in building 7 were subjected to temperatures high enough to melt and evaporate them.
"...There were fires still burning and molten steel still running 21 days after the attacks." —James M. Williams, President, Structural Engineers Association of Utah, in SEAU News, Volume VI, Issue 11, October 2001 "They showed us many fascinating slides ranging from molten metal, which was still red hot weeks after the event." —A structural engineer, quoted in the September 3, 2002 issue of The Structural Engineer magazine, Page 5 "One fireman told us that there was still molten steel at the heart of the towers' remains. Firemen sprayed water to cool the debris down but the heat remained intense enough at the surface to melt their boots." —Guy Lounsbury, a member of New York Air National Guard's 109th Air Wing, who was at Ground Zero from September 22 to October 6
"in the early days, the streams of molten metal that leaked from the hot cores and flowed down broken walls inside the foundation hole." -- William Langewiesche, the only journalist to have unrestricted access to Ground Zero during the cleanup operation "...As we get closer and closer to the center it gets hotter and hotter... it's unbelievable...it's like an oven inside, bright, bright, orangish color, at least 1500 degrees...and it's six weeks later!" —Unidentified NYFD fireman in OSHA ..ary film of ground zero "There are pieces of steel being pulled out from as far as six stories underground that are still cherry red...and the blaze is so far beyond a normal fire that it is nearly impossible to draw conclusions about it based on other fires." —Don Carson, a hazardous materials expert for the National Operating Engineers Union, six weeks after 9/11
http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/nydailynews/87451160.html? did=87451160&FMT=ABS&FMTS=FT&date=Nov+1%2C+2001&author=GREG+GITTRICH+D AILY+NEWS+STAFF+WRITER&pub=New+York+Daily+News&desc=FIRE+MAY+SMOLDER+F OR+MONTHS
"for about two and a half months after the attacks, in addition to its regular duties, NYDS played a major role in debris removal -- everything from molten steel beams to human remains...." —Kathy Dawkins, New York City Department of Sanitation (NYDS) spokesperson, in Waste Age magazine, April 1, 2002
"Underground it was still so hot that molten metal dripped down the sides of the wall from Building 6." —Worker involved with the organizing of demolition, excavation and debris removal operations at ground zero, in a Staff Statement to the 9/11 Commission
"...a steel beam being lifted from deep underground at Ground Zero was dripping from the molten steel." —Joe O'Toole, Bronx firefighter, to reporter Jennifer Lin of the Philadelphia Inquirer...05/29/2002
"Underground, it was still so hot that molten metal dripped down the sides of the wall from Building 6"
--Ken Holden, who was involved with the organizing of demolition, excavation and debris removal operations at Ground Zero, in his testimony to the 9/11 Commission (which, as we now know, was ignored) "...This was the longest-burning structural fire in history, even though it rained heavily on September 14, 2001 and again on September 21, 2001, and the fires were sprayed with high tech fire-retardants, and firetrucks sprayed a nearly constant jet of water on ground zero...You couldn't even begin to imagine how much water was pumped in there...it was like you were creating a giant lake..." —Tom Manley of the Uniformed Firefighters Association, the largest fire department union.
"...New York firefighters recall 'heat so intense they encountered rivers of molten steel'.... —New York Post, 3/3/2004
And in the event all of the individuals quoted above were victims of a mass hallucination, a reassuring piece of NASA infrared imagery that reflects the molten byproducts of this mysterious new "super kerosene"... The following are NASA Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) images taken to locate and measure the WTC site's hot spots...
WTC7 LOCATION BEFORE DEMOLITION ARE THE 2 HOTSPOTS AT TOP RIGHT IN PICTURE LEFT BELOW ..
Dr. Frank Gayle, who led the steel forensics aspects of NIST's investigation of the WTC collapses, said: "Your gut reaction would be the jet fuel is what made the fire so very intense, a lot of people figured that's what melted the steel. Indeed it didn't, the steel did not melt." --ABC News 7 (New York), 2/7/2004
So, if the jet fuel was not the cause of all the molten metal, WHAT CAUSED IT? Hint: A byproduct of the explosive Thermite is MOLTEN IRON. "...this molten metal is a direct evidence for the use of high-temperature explosives, such as thermite, used to deliberately bring down the WTC towers..." --Steven E. Jones, Professor of Physics, Brigham Young University, as reported in the Utah Deseret Morning News
MY FIFTH EMAIL 11Jul07
Mr Newman, Do you still say you have no evidence??? I am a 20 year veteran USAF fighter pilot and demolition expert...and there are 2 things we, in our field of expertise, absolutely detest!!! Liars and Quitters, and we are neither!! I truly hope that also describes your value system!! We shall see... The next aspect of 9-11-01 is that it is physically impossible for steel buildings ( WTC1,2, & 7) collapse from fire.No steel structure in the history of the world has ever fell from fire. There was a building in Madrid Spain that burned for 24 hours .
The 50 story skyscraper was burned from top to bottom and it never collapsed. There was also a building in Pennsylvania that burned for many hours and never fell. There is alot of instances . Jet fuel can only burn at 1800F degrees in perfect
conditions . The steel ( was tested by UL) that the twin towers were made from were made to withstand a fire that burned at 2800F degrees for 6 hours.
Kevin Ryan a UL (Underwriters Labritories) employee stated that the guys that designed the Twin Towers took into mind that a 757 Boeing jet could hit the towers and designed them accordingly. Mr. Ryan said that the steel the Towers were built with could have and should have with standed the fire. He also did his own labratory tests,that supported his statements. Mr. Ryan was fired for speecking out about 9-11-01. 2001Leslie Robertson: "The twin towers were in fact the first structures outside the military and nuclear industries designed to resist the impact of a jet airplane." 2001"Leslie Robertson, one of the two original structural engineers for the World Trade Center, is asked at a conference in Frankfurt, Germany what he had done to protect the twin towers from terrorist attacks. He replies, 'I designed it for a 707 to smash into it." 1993"[Building designer] John Skilling recounts his people having carried out an analysis which found the twin towers could withstand the impact of a Boeing 707. Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot
of people would be killed." But, he says, "The building structure would still be there." Keep in mind that the tower only burned for 45 minutes & 1.5 hours. the second tower hit fell first and first tower hit fell second. The 911 Commission report stated that the twin towers collapsed from the pancake effect. The floors piling up on each other till they collapsed . If this is true there should have been somekind of resistance. If it took each floor 1 second to fail then it should have took the twin towers at least 100 seconds each to collapse. RIGHT . Well in reality it took the towers 9 seconds to hit the ground. ( one at a time) If I were to go to the top of the towers right now and throw a brick off the side it would take 9 seconds to hit the ground.
So that means there was no resistance the towers fell at free fall speed.You do the math. Also if the floors piled up on each other there should be big chunks of concrete and pieces of computers, telephones , file cabinets, people, ETC.... The rescue workers never found one of those things just a big pile of steel. All the concrete and computers, telephones, ETC.... were pulvarized into dust .All of Manhattan was cover in 3 inches of dust. Now how was all of this stuff just pulvarized into dust and how did the Twin Towers fall at free fall speed with no
resistance??????? CONTROLLED DEMOLITION . Also in the wreckage of the Twin Towers (WTC 1 , WTC 2 , & WTC 7 )there was pools of molten metal. Where did this molten metal come from ???
NOTE: Notice the molten metal pouring out the window.
This molten metal came from Thermate. A CONTROL DEMOLITION tool used to cut through structural steel like a hot knife through butter. It is a combination of Aluminium Oxide , Iron , Sulfur ,and Manginesse .When combined the chemical reaction creates extreme heat making it able to cut steel. The 911 Commission touched briefly on the subject. Stating that the molten material was the melted Aluminium frame of the plane that hit the Towers. In reality when you melt Aluminium it looks silver kind of like Mercury . It does not glow bright red or orange
as does steel. Most Americans don't even know that a third building fell down on 9-11-01 at 5:30 pm .World Trade Center 7 collapsed and was not hit by a plane and WTC1 & WTC2 did not hit it when they fell... Although there were small fires (that the sprinklers should have put out).. on 5 floors in order they are 8 (American Express), 11 , 12 , 13 , & 18 (City Group).
..photobucket.com/albums/bb181/slim pimpinstb/silversteinquoteja5tb5.gif" border=0> WTC 7 was also Rudy Guilliani's command center , CIA main NYC office , and FEMA's NYC base. Larry Silverstein owns all 7 of the wtc buildings. Larry Silverstein stated on a PBS ..ary that on 9-11-01 there was already so much loss of life . So they (Silverstein & FDNY) decided to pull it and they watched the building collapse. (see Silversteins confession at www.cpa.org.au/garchve5/1108bush.html ) The 9-11 Commission report does not even try to explain what happened . They totally ignore WTC7 .If fire brought down WTC 1, WTC 2, & WTC 7 that means these 3 building were the first 3 steel structure buildings in the history of the world to collapse from fire all on the same day.Only a Idiot would believe that fire could take down these massive steel frame buildings . Fire does not shatter steel. Think about this , the law states that any disaster that happens let it be a plane crash, fire, bridge collapse , gym roof falling down , space shuttle crash, ETC... The debri must be saved and analyzed so we can improve oue building codes and fire
codes and recreate what happened . When the space shuttle exploded and all the pieces down to earth. If someone was to take a piece of evidence they were arrested and criminally charged with a crime . When planes crash in the ocean . The government goes out and drudges every piece up so they can put the plane back together, piece by piece, and recreate what happened. No one was allowed to do so in the case of 9-11-01 (WTC 1, WTC 2, & WTC 7) . The government scoped up all the pieces of the Twin Towers .Then shipped them over seas ,to China , to be recycled.The government broke the law .(Who ordered this to happen???)
MY SIXTH EMAIL 12JUL07
Mr Newman, I know how busy you must be as you did not have the time or the courtesy to return my phone calls, which your Public Affairs representative vehemently promised you would do by close of business yesterday...you are quickly turning into an enemy of the Truth, which quickly makes you an enemy of my friends and of me...And if you think we are going away, you are not only mistaken, but severely so!!! That is a promise and a threat! As I said in my previous emails, you are in a very precarious position!!
PS In respect for your obviously over-priced investigative time, I have just provided the conclusion portion of some very detailed and accurate investigation that actually took real time to accomplish! If you would like to see the entire work of scientific art, just click on the link below...and open your eyes, because we are watching with ours!!! http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/
Assuming the premise of the official explanation, the total collapses of the Twin Towers and Building 7 were the largest, most unexpected, and least understood failures of engineered steel structures in the history of the world. NIST's Report, like FEMA's 2002 report, presents the appearance of explaining the collapses of the Twin Towers, but in reality it doesn't explain them at all. Flatly asserting that "global collapse" inevitably follows "collapse initiation," the Report implies that the only issue worthy of study is how the jet impacts and fires led to collapse initiation -- an issue to which it devotes well over one hundred pages. Thus, the Report makes two fundamental claims, the first explicit and the second implicit: • • The impact damage and fires caused the tops of the Towers to lean and then begin to fall (collapse initiation). Once initiated, the collapses proceeded to total collapses.
NIST goes to great lengths to support the first claim, but commits numerous omissions and distortions in the process. It remains quiet about the second claim, except for its vague rehash of the pile-driver theory. This is indefensible, given NIST's charge to investigate the collapses. Accepting that claim requires us to believe: • That the collapses of WTC 1, 2, and 7 are the only examples of total progressive collapse of steelframed structures in history. That those collapses were gravity-driven despite showing all the common physical features of controlled demolitions. In the cases of the Twin Towers, those features included the following:
Radial symmetry: The Towers
came straight down, blowing debris symmetricaly in all directions.
• • • • •
Rapid descent: The Towers came down just slightly slower than the rate of
free-fall in a vacuum. confluent explosions.
Demolition waves: The Towers were consumed by synchronized rows of Demolition squibs: The Towers exhibited high-velocity gas ejections well below
the descending rubble.
Pulverization: The Towers' non-metallic components, such as their concrete
floors, were pulverized into fine dust.
Totality: The Towers were destroyed totally, their steel skeletons shredded
into short pieces, most less than 30 feet long.
All of these features are seen in conventional controlled demolitions. None have ever been observed in steel-framed buildings collapsing for any reason other than controlled demolition. What are the chances that a phenomenon other than controlled demolition would exhibit all six features never observed elsewhere except in controlled demolitions? NIST avoids asking this and other questions by implying that they don't exist. It uses the false assertion that partial collapse will inevitably lead to total collapse (couched in the ill-defined terms of "column instability," "global instability," "collapse initiation," and "global collapse") to imply that nothing about the actual collapses is worth considering. To shield the reader from the evidence of controlled demolition, NIST fills hundreds of pages with amazingly realistic plane crash simulations, tedious details about fire tests and simulations, and long lists of recommendations for improving building safety. It calls its event narrative of each Tower, which starts with the jet impact and ends at the point that "collapse ensued," the "probable collapse sequence," but it is neither probable nor a collapse sequence. NIST's misleadingly named "probable collapse sequence" is a mirage, masking the explosive reality of the collapses with a cinematic account of the crashes and fires. NIST's theory stops at the moment that the "upper building section began to move downwards," thus avoiding the longer timeline of the truss-failure theory and any overlap with the time span in which the demolition-like features appear. Despite NIST's theory being even more incredible than its predecessors (with spreading "column instability" triggering "global collapse" in an instant) it works better as a mirage because its timelines stop short of the collapses. NIST's Report states that its first objective is to "determine why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed." The Report does not fulfill that objective, and hides that failure with misleading headings and disproportionate, misapplied technical detail. Its authors should admit that they have failed to explain why and how the Towers collapsed, and should call for an investigation that will address rather than avoid the issue. Thanks for your time if you actually got to the bottom of this email as we will get to the bottom of WTC7 TRUTH!!!
FIRST EMAIL RECEIVED FROM NIST 16JUL2007
NIST WTC7 FINALLY ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF EVIDENCE .
----- Original Message ---From: "firstname.lastname@example.org" To: email@example.com Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 10:32:52 AM Subject: Acknowledgment of received materials Dear Col. Razer, This message is to acknowledge that NIST has received all of the materials that you have provided via e-mail regarding the World Trade Center buildings. Sincerely,
MY EMAIL REPLY TO NIST 16JUL07
Dear NIST WTC Investigation Team, I sincerely appreciate this email very much! I intended no personal "threat" to anyone on your investigation team, but only that I would not accept this information going unaddressed. Again, thank you. There is more information available. Is this the proper method of input?
MY EMAIL 20JUL07
Here is an indication of the money trail on WTC7 and why it had to be demolished. I have a four questions for your team. 1. Is any of the evidence I have submitted within the parameters of your investigation? 2. If the answer to the first question is yes, will you update your Jun26, 2007 Investigation update posted on your website to reflect that? 3. If the answer to the first question is no, I would like to be provided with a document stating the exact parameters of your investigation so that I might provide evidence to fit within those parameters, as I have much more evidence to present? 4. Is there a person and a phone number attached to this email address that I might be able to speak with, as my phone calls are still not being returned? Thank you
That Mysterious Building 7
I’ve heard several explanations as to why Building 7 absolutely had to be demolished — and given the way it was achieved, at obviously great risk to the perps. One of these is that Giuliani’s ultra-fortified “emergency” bunker on the 23rd floor served as an operations center, contained the guidance electronics for the incoming aircraft, and this evidence had to be destroyed. I don’t find this line of reasoning entirely implausible — for
instance, I’ve seen plotted extensions of the approach tracks of both aircraft that neatly intersect building 7 from opposing directions. But I’d be the first to admit this sort of conjecture hardly constitutes proof. Regardless, what remains inarguable is that this structure absolutely had to be brought down. It clearly contained hugely incriminating material of some kind that had to be shredded at any cost. If this weren’t the case, the perps wouldn’t have risked a blatantly obvious ‘pull’ in broad daylight for the world to record as probably the most compelling smoking gun of them all. I now concur with a few colleagues that the plan called for Flight 93 to crash into Bld 7. The ensuing high-visibility fireball would’ve rather neatly ‘explained’ that tower’s collapse, case closed. But the script somehow went awry, and that errant aircraft was ordered shot down over Shanksville before matters got totally out of hand. This, of course, left the perps with no choice but to pull the building several hours later — doubtless cursing to high heaven and at Murphy — in full public view. That being said, I believe the following article helps shed more light on the importance of this enigmatic building, and perhaps provide another reason why it had to be destroyed — Documents. You see, Building 7, which also housed field offices of the SEC, FBI, CIA, NSA among others, contained tons of information on corporate fraud that could, collectively, have constituted manifold ‘Enrons’ that would’ve put many, many individuals away for a few hundred years. I suspect much of what Sibel Edmonds has been barred from disclosing has a lot to do with this information — fraud, laundering, gun-running, narcotics, etc. If one were to read between Sibel’s lines in the few interviews she gave before she was totally gagged, I believe this would all soon begin to ring true. Similarly, the offices that were the target of the missile that struck the Pentagon were those of the auditors digging into the missing $2.6 trillion. They were all killed in the strike. All records were destroyed. Barbara Honnegar, who spoke at the conference in Los Angeles last Sunday (with Ed Asner and David Griffin), said she had interviewed an individual who occupied an adjacent office who actually saw banks of computers in the general vicinity of the accounting offices literally going up in smoke — self-detonating, as it were — seconds before the initial explosion (yes, there was an explosion that preceded the missile by a few minutes; that’s when the numerous fallen wall clocks froze in mid-stroke. Hmmm... evokes memories of that explosion beneath Willy Rodriguez’s feet in the WTC basement seconds before the aircraft impact on the Tower, does it
not?). Then we have the billions of dollars in insider trading... the tons of bullion being frantically trucked out of the vaults beneath the towers... This all rather eerily prompts me to recall the piece of sage advice that enigmatic diplomat in Prague gave me some months ago: “Follow the money.”
“It’s devastating. They’ll have to scrap many cases, and start from scratch on others”
-- Carmen Lawrence, ex-SEC head
MY EMAIL 23JUL07
Former California Seismic Safety Commissioner Endorses 9/11 Truth Movement classic controlled demolition with explosives:
1. Rapid onset of “collapse” 2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor - a full second prior to collapse (heard by hundreds of firemen and media reporters) 3. Symmetrical “collapse” – through the path of greatest resistance – at free-fall speed — the columns gave no resistance 4. Squibs, or “mistimed” explosions, at the upper 7 floors seen in the network videos 5. “Collapses” into its own footprint – with the steel skeleton broken up for shipment 6. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds 7. Tons of molten Metal found by CDI (Demolition Contractor) in basement (no other possible source than an incendiary cutting charge such as Thermate) 8. Chemical signature of Thermate (high tech incendiary) found in slag, solidified molten metal, and dust samples by Physics professor Steven Jones, PhD. 9. FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
10. Expert corroboration from the top European Controlled Demolition professional 11. Fore-knowledge of “collapse” by media, NYPD, FDNY And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e. 1. Slow onset with large visible deformations 2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires) 3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel 4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”. As seen in this revealing photo the Twin Towers' destruction exhibited all the characteristics of destruction by explosions:
1. Extremely rapid onset of “collapse” 2. Sounds of explosions at plane impact zone — a full second prior to collapse (heard by 118 first responders as well as by media reporters) 3. Observations of flashes (seen by numerous professionals) 4. Squibs, or “mistimed” explosions, 40 floors below the “collapsing” building seen in all the videos 5. Mid-air pulverization of all the 90,000 tons of concrete and steel decking, filing cabinets & 1000 people – mostly to dust 6. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds 7. Vertical progression of full building perimeter demolition waves 8. Symmetrical collapse – through the path of greatest resistance – at free-fall speed — the columns gave no resistance 9. 1,400 foot diameter field of equally distributed debris – outside of building footprint
10. Blast waves blew out windows in buildings 400 feet away 11. Lateral ejection of thousands of individual 20 - 50 ton steel beams up to 500 feet 12. Total destruction of the building down to individual structural steel elements – obliterating the steel core structure. 13. Tons of molten Metal found by FDNY under all 3 high-rises (no other possible source other than an incendiary cutting charge such as Thermate) 14. Chemical signature of Thermate (high tech incendiary) found in slag, solidified molten metal, and dust samples by Physics professor Steven Jones, PhD. 15. FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples 16. More than 1000 Bodies are unaccounted for — 700 tiny bone fragments found on top of nearby buildings And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e. 1. Slow onset with large visible deformations 2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires) 3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel 4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”
MY EMAIL 24JUL07
I guess you stopped answering emails. I do not appreciate being stiff armed! I just received an indication that this email address is not longer valid...is that true? What is going on there, anyway?
NIST REPLY TO MY 24JUL07 EMAIL 25JUL07
Dear Col. Razer, This message to confirm that we have been receiving your e-mails sent to the firstname.lastname@example.org e-mail account. The e-mail account is valid, although it may be possible that messages with large attachments may be blocked because of the file size. To answer your question about the parameters of the WTC Investigation, the federal building and fire safety investigation of the World Trade Center disaster is a technical investigation as defined in the National Construction Safety Team Act (P.L. 107-231) (available online at http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/hr46871.pdf). You may send information relevant to the technical investigation to this address. Sincerely, The WTC Investigation Team
MY EMAIL TO NIST 26JUL07
Again, thank you for responding...this issue is very important to our nation, to me and many others!!!
MY EMAIL TO DOJ AND US FIRE ADMINISTRATION FOLLOWING HR4687 HIGHLIGHTING CRIMINAL ACTIVITY AT NIST 26JUL07
----- Forwarded Message ---From: Guy Razer <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org; AskDOJ@usdoj.gov Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 1:31:36 PM Subject: Fw: NIST WTC7 Email Full Trail 26Jul07 Hello, I am getting very sporadic information about this ongoing NIST WTC7 investigation. I have evidence of criminal wrongdoing and from the last email I received from NIST, I have to assume, since they did not answer my 4 simple questions that I must proceed according to HR 4687 and bring in the US Attorney General's Office (although I expect nothing from Alberto Gonzales personally) and US Fire Administration, who lost many fire-fighters that day. Here are the 4 questions I asked of NIST (repeated below): 1. Is any of the evidence I have submitted within the parameters of your investigation? 2. If the answer to the first question is yes, will you update your Jun26, 2007 Investigation update posted on your website to reflect that? 3. If the answer to the first question is no, I would like to be provided with a document stating the exact parameters of your investigation so that I might provide evidence to fit within those parameters, as I have much more evidence to present? 4. Is there a person and a phone number attached to this email address that I might be able to speak with, as my phone calls are still not being returned? First, Ms McAllister, could you answer these 4 questions for me? And second, on slide 6 of your slide show bullet 5, rather than "developing a hypothesis to guide analysis", doesn't a real investigation require that analysis of evidence should guide the investigation to a logical conclusion based on all the facts?
Third, Slide 11 sentence 3 states that NIST has found no evidence of controlled demolition...is that because you are not looking for it because you have narrowed your hypothesis to avoid the cold hard facts? I think so...this is too important an investigation to approach in such a way!! I would truly like a person and a phone number to open communications for factual evidence to be presented!! Otherwise I will take it to the Congressional Oversight Committees, who are getting rather uppity lately...
MY EMAIL 8AUG07 AFTER MY PERSONAL VISIT TO NIST WHERE I WAS PHYSICALLY REMOVED FROM THE VISITORS RECEPTION AREA BY ARMED SECURITY WHO ARRIVED WHILE I WAS KEPT BUSY ON THE PHONE WITH MR NEWMAN….
NIST WTC7 Investigation Team, I really appreciated actually being able to speak with Mr Newman yesterday. Just think, it only took me all of July, an impressive amount un-returned phone calls and emails and a personal visit to your facility just to get to talk on the phone to a NIST WTC investigator, and then it was only so he could stall me until the site police chief and Lt could get there to ensure my repaid departure....The one thing that stood out in my mind after my conversation with Newman was the statement, "there is nothing you have presented in your materials that I have not seen before". I question that statement, as the transcript from the WTC7 Security eyewitness interview and transcript was not even released until Jun 19, 2007. Newman kept speaking about WTC 1/2 when my interest is an ongoing investigation, ie WTC7. The entire procedure by which your group operates is illogical to me and basically unprofessional. I assume you are taking a path laid out by your unbelievably narrow entering hypothesis of initiating factors that are for some reason not to include the explosions that eyewitnesses are screaming about. I also was told by Newman that the investigation is "virtually over"....what does that mean?? I think it means that your report is already written and I think it would best be forecast as something to do with Tom Sawyer, a fence, a paint brush, and a boat load of dead trees! This will be the last bit of information I will send you, as you have, I am sure, already seen it!!(It is an interview with one of the last first responder firemen out of the towers alive...all his buddies are dead...but his testimony should not ever influence your perspective on the events of 911...that kerosene makes buildings (all owned by lucky Larry Silverstein, who made $billions in insurance money that day) explosively collapse into themselves at free fall speeds, and one (WTC7) doesn't even need a jumbo jet crash as a catalyst, just a National Institute of Spineless Technocrats to shove the lie down our throats!!! Ya know what I say, "Colombo, you ain't!"
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=53815767687186956 Just like you have heard this! http://www.prisonplanet.com/audio/190607clips2.mp3 As per your operating directive, The National Construction Safety Team Act (P.L. 107-231) http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/hr46871.pdf I have initiated formal proceedings at the Science and Technology Congressional Oversight Committee level, the US Attorney General Inspector General level, and the US Fire Administration level, based on criminal actions totally self evident in the evidence I have sent you...just for reference, during the recent I-35 bridge collapse, the chief investigator NTSB was actively pursuing video for evidence of collapse initiation; a technique used by every investigative organization I have ever heard of except yours. The fact that you are going to somehow try to explain away the controlled demolition of a 610' tall, 47 story concrete and steel skyscraper when eyewitnesses talk about explosions and dead bodies and the BBC talks about its collapse in past tense 23 minutes before it was demolished is not only ludicrous, but down right criminally negligent and un-American. PS You should see all the new folks we are getting at patriotsquestion911.com! Why don't you quit your bullshit and join the side of Truth...you will sleep better at night....I certainly do!
MY EMAIL 15AUG07
GO FIGURE!!! I SHOULD SEND THIS TO NIST!! OH, THATS RIGHT, THEY HAVE ALREADY SEEN IT!!!
China's Tallest Building Catches Fire, Does Not Collapse
Shanghai's World Financial Center, the tallest building in China upon completion, defied all known physics yesterday afternoon when it caught fire but did not collapse, a modern day miracle in light of the commonly accepted premise that since 9/11, all steel buildings that suffer limited fire damage implode within two hours. Anyone who has visited Shanghai's Pudong district will note that the World Financial building eerily resembles the twin towers in New York that were destroyed on 9/11, which is why the sight of it catching fire yesterday would have led many to immediately fear the imminent collapse of the structure. "According to an eyewitness, the building caught fire around 4:35 p.m., and floors above the 40th floor were shrouded with dark smoke. The fire was fierce, burning debris fell from the building. Many people fled the building in panic," reports Epoch Times. "According to Mr. Deng, a local resident, floors above the 30th floor were engulfed in thick layers of smoke, while the top of the building was also smoking."
Officials put the time of the outbreak of the fire at 4pm and said that was extinguished by about 6pm. The south tower of the WTC burned for just 56 minutes before collapsing, while the north tower lasted around an hour and 45 minutes. According to the official transcripts of the firefighter tapes, fires in both towers were almost out immediately before the collapses.
The World Financial Center in Shanghai bravely remains standing after fires gutted its top floors, a modern day miracle of science and a bizarre contradiction to the officially revised version of physics that came into effect on September 11, 2001. The saving grace that could have rescued the Shanghai tower from imploding may have been the fact that it was not hit by a plane, as the twin towers were on 9/11. However, the absence of a jet strike wasn't enough to prevent WTC 7 from crumbling into its own footprint within 7 seconds later that fateful afternoon. Residents of Shanghai should rejoice that the building defied the revised version of basic physics that officially came into effect at 9:56am on September 11, 2001, and remained standing, avoiding a potential death toll of thousands.
The population of Madrid were similarly blessed in February 2005 when the 32-story Windsor Building (pictured above) was gutted by intense fires for 28 hours but did not collapse. Hundreds of buildings worldwide suffered major fires that gutted the entire facade of their structure before 9/11 and did not collapse, but since the twin towers behaved differently, rather than consider an alternative explanation for the collapse of the towers, experts simply decided to reverse the fundamental precepts of all known physics to make it easier for everyone to understand. Since that time, it has been commonly accepted that limited fires in tall buildings are 99% certain to cause an almost instantaneous collapse.
IF YOU MADE IT TO THE BOTTOM OF THIS, THANK YOU AND I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME. THIS IS SIGNIFICANT EVIDENCE AND THE INVESTIGATION IS EVEN MORE SIGNIFICANT!!! IF THE ILLEGAL DEOMLITION OF A 47 STORY STEEL AND CONCRETE SKYSCRAPER CAN BE WHITEWASHED AND SWEPT UNDER THE CARPET WHO IS TO SAY WHAT ELSE COULD BE????
Guy S. Razer, LtCol, USAF (Retired but not Tired, Inspired!) In a land where tyranny is the primary rule of law, the only 2 unpatriotic acts, in the arena of communication, are silence and ungood doublequackspeak (1984 Newspeak)!!! www.myspace.com/supereagle69 Member/Associations: www.PatriotsQuestion.com www.PatriotCalendar.com www.Pilotsfor911Truth.org www.V911T.org (Veterans for Truth) www.stj911.org (Scholars for Truth & Justice) www.Visibility911.com Interviews on file with: www.currentissues.tv www.v911t.org www.Pilotsfor911Truth.org www.Visibility911.com
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.