Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
waves and surface currents move in the same direction, the wave
amplitude is decreased but the wavelength is increased. Rajaratnam and Humphries [4] examined the scaling behavior of the
mean flow field of turbulent, nonbuoyant surface jets, and Rajaratnam and Subramanyan [5] investigated the behavior of planar
buoyant surface jets. Swean et al. [6] reported the measurements
of the mean velocities and turbulent fluctuations in a twodimensional turbulent jet at a free surface. They found that the
growth rates of the length and velocity scales resemble more
closely those observed in wall jets than those in free jets. The
work by Bernal and Kwon [7] on the vortex-ring problem provided the first convincing evidence that a vortex tube will disconnect in the vicinity of the surface and reconnect to the surface, and
subsequent important studies of Gharib and Weigand [8] on the
interaction of a vortex ring with a free surface presented a clear
picture of the stages that were involved in the early disconnection
and subsequent connection process.
Anthony and Willmarth [9] examined the mean velocity field
and Reynolds stress tensor of a turbulent jet issuing from a circular nozzle beneath and parallel to the free surface using a threecomponent laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV). They reported that
the turbulent fluctuations normal to the free surface were diminished, whereas those parallel to the surface were enhanced. They
also reported the existence of a flow outward, away from the jet
axis in a thin layer near the surface. Based on the flow visualization results, they showed that this outward flow or surface
current consisted mainly of vortical structures ejected from the
jet. Within the surface current, turbulent mixing was reduced
greatly. Madnia and Bernal [10] examined the same flow over a
wide range of Reynolds and Froude numbers using flow
C 2014 by ASME
Copyright V
Experimental Setup
the high-speed camera and the laser system were the same as that
used in LIF. The tap water in the facility was seeded with 10 lm
hollow glass spheres with a density of 1.04 kg/m3. The camera
was operated at 1024 752 pixels, 1024 896 pixels and
1024 1024 pixels in the vertical central plane for the case of H/
D 2, H/D 4 and H/D 6, respectively. The region we chose in
the surface-normal (z) direction was wide enough to contain the
jet boundary for each case. The framing rate was 4000 Hz for each
case in the vertical plane. At each field-of-view in the vertical
plane of the case H/D 2, 14,000 image frames were acquired
and stored in the cameras internal memory (16 GB) successively.
The ensemble size of each field-of-view in the vertical plane of
the case H/D 4 was 12,000 and a corresponding size of 10,800
for the case of H/D 6. On the other hand, the camera was operated at 1024 1024 pixels with the same framing rate in the horizontal central plane for all the experiments and 10,000 image
frames were acquired successively for each field-of-view. The
interrogation window size was 24 24 pixels with 50% overlap,
which yielded a measurement grid of velocity vectors with a spacing of 0.57 mm 0.57 mm in the vertical central plane for all the
cases and a spacing of 0.61 mm 0.61 mm in the horizontal central plane for all the cases. The standard cross correlation algorithm, in combination with window offset [19], sub-pixel
Fig. 2 LIF images. (a) A region covered X/D 5 1329 for H/D 5 2,
(b) A region covered X/D 5 2137 for H/D 5 4, and (c) a region
covered X/D 5 2137 for H/D 5 6.
Fig. 3 Normalized mean streamwise velocity contour and vector profiles, Uc is the
centerline velocity at the respective X/D location. (a) H/D 5 2, (b) H/D 5 4, and (c) H/
D 5 6.
3.1 Flow Visualization. Prior to the detailed structure analysis of the jet interacting with the free surface, a first-hand look at
the most interesting and intuitive flow changes were gained from
the laser-induced fluorescence visualizations. Figure 2 shows the
LIF results. In each figure, the flow moved from left to right, and
the red line represented the free surface. The resolution of these
three images is same but the area shown in the image is different
because the jet attachment occurred in the far field in the case of
H/D 4 and H/D 6. In case of H/D 2, shown in Fig. 2(a), the
101104-4 / Vol. 136, OCTOBER 2014
X/D 1626
Part I X/D 1626
Part II X/D 26.536.5
Part I X/D 1626
Part II X/D 26.536.5
POD domain
Acquisition time
2.7 s
X/D 1626
X/D 1626
X/D 1626
2.5 s
2.5 s
2.5 s
Part I 2.7 s
Part I 2.7 s
Part II 2.7 s
Part II 2.7 s
Fig. 5 First four eigenmodes of H/D 5 2 on the vertical central plane. (a) 1st mode,
(b) 2nd mode, (c) 3rd mode, and (d) 4th mode.
Fig. 6 A dynamic plot of the instantaneous flow field reconstructed by the first
four eigenmodes (H/D 5 2 vertical central plane)
Fig. 7 First four eigenmodes of H/D 5 2 on the horizontal central plane. (a) 1st
mode, (b) 2nd mode, (c) 3rd mode, and (d) 4th mode.
Fig. 8 A dynamic plot of the instantaneous flow field reconstructed by the first
four eigenmodes (H/D 5 2 horizontal central plane)
Fig. 9 First four eigenmodes of H/D 5 4 (Part I) on the vertical central plane. (a) 1st mode, (b)
2nd mode, (c) 3rd mode, and (d) 4th mode.
Fig. 10 First four eigenmodes of H/D 5 4 (Part II) on the vertical central plane. (a) 1st mode, (b)
2nd mode, (c) 3rd mode, and (d) 4th mode.
Fig. 11 A dynamic plot of the instantaneous flow field reconstructed by the first four
eigenmodes (H/D 5 4 vertical central plane, Part I)
Fig. 12 A dynamic plot of the instantaneous flow field reconstructed by the first four
eigenmodes (H/D 5 4 vertical central plane, Part II)
Fig. 13 First four eigenmodes of H/D 5 4 on the horizontal central plane. (a) 1st mode, (b) 2nd
mode, (c) 3rd mode, and (d) 4th mode.
Fig. 14 A dynamic plot of the instantaneous flow field reconstructed by the first
four eigenmodes (H/D 5 4 horizontal central plane)
Fig. 15 First four eigenmodes of H/D 5 6 (Part I) on the vertical central plane. (a) 1st mode, (b)
2nd mode, (c) 3rd mode, and (d) 4th mode.
(1)
Rx; x0 /x0 dx0 k/ x
Here, R(x, x0 ) is the two-point correlation matrix of realizations of
the random field,
Rx; x0 < u xu x0 >
(2)
Fig. 16 First four eigenmodes of H/D 5 6 (Part II) on the vertical central plane. (a) 1st mode, (b)
2nd mode, (c) 3rd mode, and (d) 4th mode.
the largest turbulent kinetic energy and shows the spreading and
entrainment trend, which is the intrinsic feature in a jet flow. The
upward spreading motion of the jet flow and the subsequently
impingement caused the violent free surface vibration in the nearfield. In the far-field, the portion close to the free surface showed
a weak reverse flow trend, indicating the surface push away
effect on the jet flow due to the free surface vibration in this
region. When the reverse flow met the main spreading flow, its
flow direction was changed and began to move downward and
eventually was merged into a stream with the main spreading flow
in the lower portion of the jet. The second spatial mode in
Fig. 5(b) is highly correlated with the first spatial mode and shows
the same large-scale structures, except for a shift in phase. The
most important feature of the third mode in Fig. 5(c) is that a large
clockwise vortex appears at the left side free surface, which can
be attributed to the formation of the secondary vortex in the region
where the free surface was strongly distorted [8]. The fourth spatial mode shows the long-narrow elliptical structures near the surface, indicating a squeeze effect of the surface boundary on the
flow structures.
Journal of Fluids Engineering
To better reveal the evolution of dominant structures in the vertical plane, a dynamic plot of the instantaneous fluctuating flow
field reconstructed by the first four eigenmodes is shown in Fig. 6.
The four reconstructed flow fields revealed a typical interaction
process of the large-scale structures in the surface jet with the free
surface and contained different free surface boundary conditions.
For better understand the interaction process, the original PIV
boundary image was also shown together with the corresponding
reconstructed field. In Fig. 6(a), the free surface has violent vibration and a pair of valley and peak can be identified easily. The salient feature of the reconstructed fluctuating flow fields is the
strong downward reverse flow just beneath the surface depression
region in the near field. The strong free surface downward motion
pushed the surrounding fluid away and gave rise to the downward
reverse flow trend, and subsequently it encountered with the main
jet flow and forced the main flow to change its direction. In addition, a small vortex was induced due to the changing of main flow
direction. In Fig. 6(b), the valley and peak identified in Fig. 6(a)
were transferred to downstream and a new peak appeared at the
left side due to the convection of the large-scale structures. The
OCTOBER 2014, Vol. 136 / 101104-11
Fig. 17 A dynamic plot of the instantaneous flow field reconstructed by the first
four eigenmodes (H/D 5 6 vertical central plane, Part I)
Fig. 18 A dynamic plot of the instantaneous flow field reconstructed by the first four eigenmodes (H/D 5 6 vertical central plane, Part II)
topology of the flow field was totally changed. The third spatial
mode in Fig. 9(c) was correlated with the second mode with a
phase difference. The large-scale structures became smaller in the
fourth spatial mode and several small-scale vortices were
observed in the far-field.
Figure 10 shows the first four spatial modes in the far-field in
the vertical plane, at H/D 4 (Part II). The jet flow in this region
was fully attached to the free surface. A large vortex across the
whole upper half of the jet was observed in Fig. 10(a), indicating
that the first spatial mode was related to the merging and restructured process of the vortical structures. The second spatial mode
showed the similar large-scale structures and was also related to
the merging process. We conjectured that turbulence field might
be restructured and quasi-two-dimensionalized by the free surface
(faster damping of the vertical component of turbulence). In addition, the merging of like-sign vortices shifted the size distribution
towards larger structures and gave rise to a reverse energy cascade
[14]. The vortical structures in the third and fourth modes in
Figs. 10(c) and 10(d) became smaller compared to the first two
modes.
Journal of Fluids Engineering
Fig. 19 First four eigenmodes of H/D 5 6 on the horizontal central plane. (a) 1st mode, (b) 2nd
mode, (c) 3rd mode, and (d) 4th mode.
topology of the flow field in a short time. Figure 12 shows the convection of large-scale structures in the far-field (Part II, H/D 4).
Figure 12(a) shows two large-scale vortices, making a counterrotating vortex pair. In Fig. 12(b), the counter-rotating vortex pair
was transferred to downstream and a new counterclockwise vortex
appeared at the left side. As the convection proceeding, a new
clockwise vortex was developing at the left side. In Fig. 12(d), the
former counter-rotating vortex pair disappeared from the field of
view and a new vortex pair appeared at the same position. Two
features of the large-scale vortex must be mentioned here, the size
and the orientation. The size of the vortex spans across the whole
upper half and the vortices are orientated almost in a line, indicating that there is a merging and restructured process during the
interaction of the jet flow with the free surface.
As discussed above, the upwelling motion of the surface jet and
the subsequent large surface-parallel vortex revealed in Figs. 9
and 11 totally changed the flow structures in the vertical plane
(Part I). Therefore there must be a corresponding change of the topology of the flow field in the horizontal central plane. Figure 13
shows the first four spatial modes in the horizontal central plane,
at H/D 4. In Fig. 13(a), the first spatial mode was separated into
two parts. Two large vortices appeared at the right side, making a
counter-rotating vortex pair. The left side showed the jet spreading motion. If we think of the surface-parallel vortex revealed in
Figs. 9 and 11, then it is easy to understand that the spatial structures in Fig. 13(a) is associated with the rotating motion of the
large-scale surface-parallel vortex. The large rebounding vortex,
shown in Fig. 11, passed through the horizontal central plane and
separated the flow structures. The second and third spatial mode
in Figs. 13(b) and 13(c) both show a very large vortex, which is
associated with the entrainment motion of the large-scale surfaceparallel vortex. The size of vortical structure became smaller in
the fourth spatial mode.
101104-14 / Vol. 136, OCTOBER 2014
Fig. 20 A dynamic plot of the instantaneous flow field reconstructed by the first
four eigenmodes (H/D 5 6 horizontal central plane)
Conclusions
(i)
the time-averaged flow field shows that the jet reached the
free surface at around X/D 24, the large-scale turbulent
motions are significantly changed, which is associated
with the upwelling motion of some vortices in the jet and
their subsequently downward entrainment due to the confinement in the vertical plane. In Part II, the jet is fully
attached to the free surface, and the vortical structures
undergo a merging and restructured process in the upper
half of the jet. In the horizontal central plane, dynamic
structures in the same streamwise region as Part I in the
vertical plane were investigated. The flow structures are
also changed due to the abovementioned vortex in part I in
the vertical plane.
(iii) In the case of H/D 6, dynamic structures in the same
streamwise regions as H/D 4 were investigated. In Part
I, the dominant structures are not significantly changed
and show an approximately symmetric pattern. The dominant structures in the corresponding horizontal central
plane also show an approximately symmetric pattern. In
Part II, the jet does not undergo a merging and restructured
process as shown in the case of H/D 4, because the distance from jet axis to the free surface increased and the
interaction became weaker. The rebounding vortex also
shows the downward entrainment motion but does not significantly change the dominant structures.
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by the National Research Foundation
of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korea Government (MSIP)
through GCRC-SOP (No. 2011-0030013) and KETEP
(No. 20112010100030-12-2-300) and a Grant (No. 51176108) from
the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC).
Nomenclature
D
FOV
H
L
LDV
LIF
PIV
POD
Uc
X
nozzle diameter
field-of-view
depth to jet axis
length of pipe
laser Doppler velocimetry
laser induced fluorescence
particle image velocimetry
proper orthogonal decomposition
local centerline velocity
streamwise coordinate
Y transverse coordinate
Z vertical coordinate
References
[1] Reed, A. M., Beck, R. F., Griffin, O. M., and Peltzer, R. D., 1990,
Hydrodynamics of Remotely Sensed Surface Ship Wakes, Trans. Soc. Nav.
Archit. Mar. Eng., 98, pp. 319363.
[2] Reed, A. M., and Milgram, J. H., 2002, Ship Wakes and Their Radar Images,
Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 34, pp. 469502.
[3] Evans, J. T., 1955, Pneumatic and Similar Breakwaters, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 231, pp. 457466.
[4] Rajaratnan, N., and Humphries, L. A., 1984, Turbulent Non-Buoyant Surfaces
Jets, J. Hydraul. Res., 22, pp. 103115.
[5] Rajaratnan, N., and Subramanyan, S., 1985, Plane Turbulent Buoyant Surface
Jets, J. Hydraul. Res., 23, pp. 131146.
[6] Swean, T. F., Ramberg, S. E., Plesniak, M. W., and Stewart, M. B., 1989,
Turbulent Surface Jet in Channel of Limited Depth, J. Hydraul. Engng., 115,
pp. 15871606.
[7] Bernal, L. P., and Kwon, J. T., 1989, Vortex Ring Dynamics at a Free
Surface, Phys. Fluids A, 1(3), pp. 449451.
[8] Gharib, M., and Weigand, A., 1996, Experimental Studies of Vortex Disconnection and Connection at a Free Surface, J. Fluid Mech., 321, pp. 5986.
[9] Anthony, D. G., and Willmarth, W. W., 1992, Turbulence Measurements in a
Round Jet Beneath a Free Surface, J. Fluid Mech., 243, pp. 699720.
[10] Madnia, C. K., and Bernal, L. P., 1994, Interaction of a Turbulent Round Jet
With the Free Surface, J. Fluid Mech., 261, pp. 305332.
[11] Walker, D. T., Chen, C. Y., and Willmarth, W. W., 1995, Turbulent Structure
in Free-Surface Jet Flows, J. Fluid Mech., 291, pp. 223261.
[12] Walker, D. T., 1997, On the Origin of the Surface Current in Turbulent FreeSurface Flows, J. Fluid Mech., 339, pp. 275285.
[13] Tsai, W., and Yue, D. K. P., 1995, Effects of Soluble and Insoluble Surfactant
on Laminar Interactions of Vertical Flows With a Free Surface, J. Fluid
Mech., 289, pp. 315349.
[14] Sarpkaya, T., 1996, Vorticity, Free Surface, and Surfactants, Ann. Rev. Fluid
Mech., 28, pp. 83128.
[15] Judd, K. P., Smith, G. B., Handler, R. A., and Sisodia, A., 2008, The Thermal
Signature of a Low Reynolds Number Submerged Turbulent Jet Impacting a
Free Surface, Phys. Fluids, 20(1), p. 115102.
[16] Shinneeb, A. M., Bugg, J. D., and Balachandar, R., 2011, Coherent Structures
in Shallow Water Jets, ASME J. Fluids Eng., 133(3), p. 011203.
[17] Tian, J. H., Roussinova, V., and Balachandar, R., 2012, Characteristics of a Jet
in the Vicinity of a Free Surface, ASME J. Fluids Eng., 134(1), p. 031204.
[18] Kim, J. S., Kim, S. M., Kim, H. D., Ji, H. S., and Kim, K. C., 2012, Dynamic
Structures of Bubble-Driven Liquid Flows in a Cylindrical Tank, Exp. Fluids,
53, pp. 2135.
[19] Westerweel, J., Dabiri, D., and Gharib, M., 1997, The Effect of a Discrete
Window Offset on the Accuracy of Cross-Correlation Analysis of Digital PIV
Recordings, Exp. Fluids, 23, pp. 2028.
[20] Yasuhiko, S., Nishio, Y., Okuno, T., and Okamoto, K., 2000, A Highly Accurate Iterative PIV Technique Using a Gradient Method, Meas. Sci. Technol.,
11, pp. 16661673.
[21] Lumley, J. L., Holmes, P., and Berkooz, G., 1993, The Proper Orthogonal
Decomposition in the Analysis of Turbulent Flows, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech.,
25, pp. 539575.
[22] Sirovich, L., 1987, Turbulence and the Dynamics of Coherent Structures Part
I: Coherent Structures, Quart. Appl. Math, 45, pp. 561571.