10 views

Uploaded by SufiaSyah Exertion

anova

save

- ANALISIS MEZCLAS
- ANOVA Presentation
- ANOVAf03
- Bio Intensive Mixtures
- Analysis of Variance -Nominal
- SPSS
- Field Turf Microbial Survivorship PJAS State Abstract
- ANOVAf03
- Verbal Stats.docx
- Using Graphics and Statistics
- 1982_Pellegrini__Galda_the Effects of Thematic-fantasy Play Training on the Development of Childrens Story Comprehension
- ANOVAf03
- Analysis of Variation
- Evolution of trace gas concentrations at Airports in the LA Basin
- Between Within Stata Analysis
- Document
- 33. Ijasr - Studies on Efficacy of Entomopathogeni
- experimental-design-and-data-analysis-for-biologists1.pdf
- Effectiveness of Aroma on Work Efficiency
- AAIG - Measurement Systems Analysis - Manual.pdf
- Anova 2012
- Workshop Commerce
- [Ch. 6] Comparisons of Several Multivariate Means MH & NAM
- G. Yukl: Influence Tactics and Objectives in Upward, Downward and Lateral
- Ijrcm 1 Vol 3 Issue 11 Art 17
- Political Extremism is Supported by an Illusion of Understanding
- Tam
- Topic Anova
- An Ova
- Topic 5_anova Statistic
- Gill v. Lopez (18-LM-1304 - Complaint)
- GUIA DIDACTICA DE PREESCOLAR QUERETARO.doc
- 2015 Erosion Failure Analysis of CFBC Boiler
- Traigolzu Saga Di Emanuele Nicolosi
- Tin oxidation
- CSWIP Practice Multi Choice
- Expocision de Modelos
- 1541620046.pdf
- Phd Scribd Downloader
- EXPANSION JOINT Treatment methodology .pdf
- 62653-1994-An_Act_Creating_the_Technical_Education_and.pdf
- maquinarias teoria - formulario
- Carta de Renuncia
- A Alegria Está No Coração
- ADA 1
- 2817-7307-1-SM.pdf
- soal
- La_responsabilidad_contractual_en_derecho_chileno.pdf
- 55475811-GUIA-DE-ANALISIS-DE-RESIDUOS-SOLIDOS.pdf
- LITERATURA PERUANA
- hhhju
- Lamp Iran
- Twenty Four Five
- 3.1.4.3 Laporan Hasil Audit Internal
- Nocturne_No._20_in_C_Minor.pdf
- Estudio de Peligro Geologico - Hidrologico de La Cuenca Del Quesermayo
- humphries
- Fiter Press
- capitulo3.pdf
- fnr
- english
- Anda Dikehendaki Membuat Satu Penulisan Ilmiah Berkaitan Pentaksiran Alternatif Yang Dipilih Berdasarkan Kepada Kandungan Berikut
- 20120302190332Perincian Tugasan 1 Kritikal Reviu
- Lampiran a1 Komtep 2018
- BUNDARKAN
- 1 Unggul
- 20150919090951Lab 1_finding and reviewing journal article.docx
- Carta Organisasi Kelas
- FORM 1
- english2
- Brochure
- 20120302190311Perincian T3 PST
- Carta Gantt
- Borang Skor Beep Test
- BORANG SKOR BEEP TEST.docx
- Bateri Ujian Bola Jaring (1)
- Qualitative Biomechanical Principle for Application in Coaching
- Variables
- Borang Maklumat Graduan (Tuntut Posting 2015)
- Rubrik Pemarkahan Dan Penilaian Pendidikan Seni Visual Sekolah Rendah
- Journal Article Review
- Lirik Lagu Desa Tercinta
- Planned and Reactive Agility Test
- M20142002280_221527_draft
- Ujian Open Book Test
- Rujukan Apa
- RUJUKAN
- Ujian Open Book Test
- Definitions of Variables

You are on page 1of 13

10

In a study on the effects of stress on illness, a researcher tallied the

number of colds people contracted during a 6-month period as a function

of the amount of stress they reported during that same time period. There

were three stress levels: minimal, moderate, and high stress. The sum of

squares appear in the ANOVA summary table below. The mean for each

condition and the number of participants per condition are also noted.

Source

Between

groups

Within

groups

Total

Stress Level

Minimal

Moderate

High

df

SS

22.167

MS

F

14.750

36.917

Mean

3

4

6

n

4

4

4

a.

b.

c.

d.

**Complete the ANOVA summary table.
**

Is Fobt significant at α = .05?

Perform post hoc comparisons if necessary.

What conclusions can be drawn from the F-ratio and the post hoc

comparisons?

e. What is the effect size, and what does this mean?

f. Graph the mean.

1

3 = 9 N–1 Total 36.1 =9 = 11 Mencari nilai (MS) SS Total = SS Between + SSWithin 36. Complete the ANOVA summary table.750 MSBetween = MS Within = SSBetween df Between SSWithin df Within = = 22.ANSWER NO.917=22. Source df k-1 Between groups SS MS F 22.08 6.750 1.79 14.917 12 – 1 = 11 Mencari nilai (df) dfb = 3 – 1 dfw = 12 – 3 =2 dft = 12 .167 11.63 3–1=2 N–k Within groups 12 . 10 a.63 2 .08 = 1.167 2 14.167+14.75 9 = 11.

01 = Q (k. p < .52 d.95 = √ √ 1.b.79. dfw ) ¿ 3.9 ¿ √ √ √ MS within n 1. HSD 0.43 √ 0.05? Fobt = 6.79 Fcv = 4.05 = Q( k.63 4 √ 0.95 ¿ 3. What conclusions can be drawn from the F-ratio and the post hoc comparisons? 3 .79 Fobt c. df within ) HSD0.26 Yes. 9 ) = 6.4075 = 5. Is Fobt significant at α = .01 = Q ( 3.63 8 MS within n ¿ 2.43 = 5.01 Figure 1 Rejecte d 4.63 4 = 5.26 Fcv 6. Perform post hoc comparisons if necessary.4 075 MS w n HSD0.95 ×0. significant.638 3. F ( 2.43× 0.

Figure 1 7 6 5 4 Amount of Stress 3 2 1 0 Minimal Moderate High Stress Level 4 . Specifically. f.The amount of stress had a significant effect on illness.60 ×100 ¿ 60 The effect size is 60%.167 = SSTotal 36.6 ¿ 0. the number of colds people contracted during a 6-month period as a high stress effect more than the minimal and moderate stress level. Graph the mean.917 ¿ 0. What is the effect size. e. and what does this mean? SSBetween 22.

313 groups Within 2118. c.313 “Drug” Condition Control Placebo “Drug” Mean 36. Graph the mean. Source Between df SS 1202.QUESTION NO.33 24. and what does this mean? f. and an experimental group that received the “drug”. A depression inventory that provided a measure of depression on a 50-point scale was used (50 indicates that an individual is very high on the depression variable). Is Fobt significant at α = . 12 A researcher conducted an experiment on the effect of a new “drug” on depression. What conclusions can be drawn from the F-ratio and the post hoc comparisons? e. 5 .05? Perform post hoc comparisons if necessary.26 33. What is the effect size. a placebo group. The researcher had a control group that received nothing.13 MS F n 15 15 15 a. The ANOVA summary table appears below. b. Complete the ANOVA summary table.00 groups Total 3320. d. alon with the mean depression score for each condition.

92 2118.00 50. 12 a.33 24.42 = 11.42 1202.ANSWER NO.15 = MSWithin 50.313 2 2118.15 = 50.92 6 . Complete the ANOVA summary table.42 3 -1 = 2 (N–k) Within groups 45 – 3 = 42 (N–1) Total 3320.00 42 n 15 15 15 = 601.313 45 – 1 = 44 “Drug” Condition Control Placebo “Drug” Mean 36.15 11.26 33.13 MS Between = MS Within = F= SSBetween df between SSWithin df Within = = MSBettween 601. Source df (k–1) Between groups SS MS F 1202.313 601.

df within ) Q ( 3.92 Fobt c.36 3.83 6.44 ×1.30 7 .92 Fcv = 3.37 × 1.01 = Q (k .42¿ n 3.36 = 4. df within ) √ √ MS within n MS within Q ( 3.44 √ 3.42 ¿ √ √ √ MS within n MSwithin n 50.42 15 HSD0.37 = 4. p < . Is Fobt significant at α = .37 √ 3.23 ( d = 0.b.92. Perform post hoc comparisons if necessary. F (2. 42) = 11. significant.42 15 = 4.01 = HSD0.05? Fobt = 11.05) Yes.01 Figure 2 Rejecte d 3.05 = = = = = Q (k .44 √ 50.0 3.23 Fcv 11.05 = HSD0. HSD0.83 = 8.

Graph the mean.31 3320. e. and what does this mean? n2=¿ SSBetween SSTotal = 1202.31 = 0. f. thus knowing the “drug” control to which participants were designed can explain 36% of the variability in depressions. Specifically.36 ×100 = 36 The effect size is 36%. What is the effect size. What conclusions can be drawn from the F-ratio and the post hoc comparisons? The amount of effect of a new “drug” had significant effect on depression.d. 8 .36 = 0. experimental group that received the “drug” significant higher effect on depression more the those control group and placebo group.

Following are the mean number of 1-inch pieces of pizza eaten for each condition from 10 participants who had the opportunity to eat as many pieces with each type of crust as they desired. 14 A researcher has been hired by a pizzeria to determine which type of crust customers prefer. The ANOVA summary table also follows. and thin.05 Error 21.50 10 9 .20 10 Thin 8. Source Participant df SS 2.45 Crust Type Hand-tossed MS df SS 2.75 Between F 180.73 n 10 Thick 4.Figure 2 40 Depression 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Control Placebo " " Drug Condition QUESTION NO. thick.65 Total 204. The restaurant offers three type of crust: hand-tossed.

a. Graph the mean. What conclusions can be drawn from the F-ratio and the post hoc comparisons? e. Is Fobt significant at α = .05 90. d. b.65 1. Source Participant df n–1 SS 2. 14 a. c.30 F 180.20 10 – 1 = 9 Between groups k–1 3–1=2 Error groups (k-1)(n-1) = 18 (2)(9) = 18 Total N–1 204.02 75. What is the effect size. Complete the ANOVA summary table.45 30 – 1 = 29 Mencari nilai (df) 10 . Complete the ANOVA summary table.05? Perform post hoc comparisons if necessary. and what does this mean? f.75 MS 0.01 21. ANSWER NO.

01 Q (k.01 MSErrow 1.01 MSBettween F 90. 2 10 = 4.70 √ 0.30 df Participant 9 MS Between = MSError = SSBetween df between SSError df Error = = 180. √ √ MS within n 1.65 18 = 90. Perform post hoc comparisons if necessary. 7 0 ×0. df within ) Q ( 3.18 dfe = (3-1) (10-1) = 29 dfp = dft – dfb - =2–9 = 29 – = 18 =9 Kiraan nilai (MS) MSParticipant = SSParticipant 2.05? Yes.01.60 √ MS within n 11 Rejecte d .18 ¿ Fobt c.01 3.02 = 1.01 = 75.20 b. significant.70 = 4. Is Fobt significant at α = .02 F= = = 75.20 Figure 3 HSD0.55 Fcv = HSD0.05 2 21. 18) = 75.34 1.12 = 4.75 = =0. p < .dfb = 3 – 1 dfe dft = 30 – 1 =2 2 . (2.

05 204.2 10 = 3. and what does this mean? SSBetween SSTotal = 180.61 √ 0.61 = 3.05 = Q (K.61× 0.18 ¿ √ √ MS within n 1. What conclusions can be drawn from the F-ratio and the post hoc comparisons? The amount of the crust type had significant effect on pizzeria to determine. e.88 ×100 12 .88 ¿ 0. thin group significant higher more than thick and hand-tossed group.√ MS Error HSD0.12 = 3.45 ¿ 0.23 d. Specifically. df Error ) n HSD0. What is the effect size.34 = 1.05 = Q ( 3.

Graph the mean. f.¿ 88 The effect size is 88%. thus knowing the crust type to which participants were assigned can explain 88% of variability in pizzeria to determine. Figure 3 9 8 7 6 5 pizzeria to determine 4 3 2 1 0 Hand-tossed Thick Thin Crust-Type 13 .

- ANALISIS MEZCLASUploaded bytool1649
- ANOVA PresentationUploaded bySabiq Farhan
- ANOVAf03Uploaded byluins38
- Bio Intensive MixturesUploaded byAnido Florist
- Analysis of Variance -NominalUploaded bysalman672003
- SPSSUploaded byLakish Maddoo
- Field Turf Microbial Survivorship PJAS State AbstractUploaded byTeddy Larkin
- ANOVAf03Uploaded byRakesh Mali
- Verbal Stats.docxUploaded byMikoto Mpap Kujou
- Using Graphics and StatisticsUploaded byvsuarezf2732
- 1982_Pellegrini__Galda_the Effects of Thematic-fantasy Play Training on the Development of Childrens Story ComprehensionUploaded bykarupach
- ANOVAf03Uploaded bysamiwarraich519
- Analysis of VariationUploaded byUlises Garcha
- Evolution of trace gas concentrations at Airports in the LA BasinUploaded byjpeterson1
- Between Within Stata AnalysisUploaded byMaria Pappa
- DocumentUploaded bySamyChemala
- 33. Ijasr - Studies on Efficacy of EntomopathogeniUploaded byTJPRC Publications
- experimental-design-and-data-analysis-for-biologists1.pdfUploaded byAstharot
- Effectiveness of Aroma on Work EfficiencyUploaded bypornflake666
- AAIG - Measurement Systems Analysis - Manual.pdfUploaded byKris Wiloch
- Anova 2012Uploaded byNayana Unni
- Workshop CommerceUploaded byananthalaxmi
- [Ch. 6] Comparisons of Several Multivariate Means MH & NAMUploaded byGabriel Jácome
- G. Yukl: Influence Tactics and Objectives in Upward, Downward and LateralUploaded byAnna László
- Ijrcm 1 Vol 3 Issue 11 Art 17Uploaded bySunita Nishad
- Political Extremism is Supported by an Illusion of UnderstandingUploaded byFedoxyz
- TamUploaded bycurious01
- Topic AnovaUploaded byIda Hasniza
- An OvaUploaded byzukri
- Topic 5_anova StatisticUploaded byDanny Lai

- englishUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- Anda Dikehendaki Membuat Satu Penulisan Ilmiah Berkaitan Pentaksiran Alternatif Yang Dipilih Berdasarkan Kepada Kandungan BerikutUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- 20120302190332Perincian Tugasan 1 Kritikal ReviuUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- Lampiran a1 Komtep 2018Uploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- BUNDARKANUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- 1 UnggulUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- 20150919090951Lab 1_finding and reviewing journal article.docxUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- Carta Organisasi KelasUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- FORM 1Uploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- english2Uploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- BrochureUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- 20120302190311Perincian T3 PSTUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- Carta GanttUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- Borang Skor Beep TestUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- BORANG SKOR BEEP TEST.docxUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- Bateri Ujian Bola Jaring (1)Uploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- Qualitative Biomechanical Principle for Application in CoachingUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- VariablesUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- Borang Maklumat Graduan (Tuntut Posting 2015)Uploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- Rubrik Pemarkahan Dan Penilaian Pendidikan Seni Visual Sekolah RendahUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- Journal Article ReviewUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- Lirik Lagu Desa TercintaUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- Planned and Reactive Agility TestUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- M20142002280_221527_draftUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- Ujian Open Book TestUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- Rujukan ApaUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- RUJUKANUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- Ujian Open Book TestUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion
- Definitions of VariablesUploaded bySufiaSyah Exertion