You are on page 1of 88

Design Review and Construction Supervision of the

Upgrading from Gravel to Paved (Bituminous) standard of


Musita -Lumino / Busia -Majanji Road (104 kms)
DRAINAGE STRUCTURES DESIGN REVIEW
By Eng PM Batumbya
Contents
1

Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 5

Overview of the Drainage Design Report ............................................................................... 5

2.1

Design Consultants categorisation of drainage structures ............................................... 5

2.2

Existing drainage structures ........................................................................................... 5

2.3

BoQ Value of Structures (Series 6000) ............................................................................ 5

2.4

Recommended drainage structures ................................................................................ 6

2.5

Summary of the Design Engineers findings: .................................................................... 6

Design Review...................................................................................................................... 7
3.1

Design Review Methodology.......................................................................................... 7

3.2
Summary of the Design Review Consultants Field Assessment of the current state of the
existing drainage structures...................................................................................................... 7
3.3

Review of the Standards and /or Departures adopted by the Design Consultant ................ 9

3.3.1

Culvert pipes ............................................................................................................. 9

3.3.2

Box culverts .............................................................................................................. 9

3.3.3

Side drains ................................................................................................................10

3.4

Recommended Drainage structures...............................................................................10

3.5
Review of the Appropriateness of the Design and Details for the Drainage structures, the
resulting quantities and Completeness of the Designs ...............................................................11
4

Review outcomes ................................................................................................................12


4.1

Major structures re-designed ........................................................................................12

Conclusion ..........................................................................................................................13

Executive Summary
The design review for the drainage structures is based on the ToR for the Design Review
Consultants assignment. The designs were prepared by Smec in association with New Plan. The
procedure for design of road drainage structures in Uganda is set out in the Road Design Manual
Volume 2 Drainage Design, Ministry of Works, Housing and Communications, updated 2010.

This report is based on a review of the (i) Design Report, (ii)the book of drawings, (ii) the
review by the hydrologist/hydraulic specialist and (iv) the relevant references to the MOWT
Road and Bridge Design manuals and guidelines
Review findings
1. Drainage structures have been classified by the design consultant into two categories of
Major and Minor structures with major structures comprising: Bridges, Slab culverts, and Box
culverts. The minor structures are named as: concrete or metallic single or multiple cell openings
and all the road side drainage facilities.

2. Current state of the drainage structures has been established through a field assessment
of cross and side drains. Appendix 1-3.1(a) and Appendix 1-3.1(b) present summary of the
physical and functional state at each chainage. The comparison table below shows the
findings during the design and design review phase respectively:

Design Consultants findings

Design Review Consultants findings

1) Poor state of the drainage structures was reported


to be a major issue along the road contributing to
the road damage;
2) Majority of the facilities were found inadequate
3) Where the length of the pipe culvert lines is shorter
than the road carriageway, the road becomes
narrowed in width
4) There are several locations of marshes and swampy
stretches through which the road traverses being
overtopped during the regular rainy seasons
5) The cover over most of the pipe culverts has been
worn off leading to broken culvert pipe lines
6) Inadequate hydraulic capacity has led to the
addition of culvert lines alongside existing ones;
however, the works have reduced the riding quality
of the road without effectively addressing the
capacity problem
7) The construction of the drainage structures is poor
and regular maintenance is lacking
8) Some of the structures have outlived their service
life
9) The poor quality of the elements have led to poor
structural capacity of a number of pipe culvert lines.
10) There are no existing bridges on any of the two
Musita-Lumino and Busia-Majanji road links

1) Regular or routine maintenance is missing and


therefore the asset has deteriorated much more
than if there was deliberate road overseer work
supported by spot repairs
2) The predominant size of the pipe culverts is 600
mm diameter in concrete; only a few are 900 and
none bigger than that.
3) Majority of culvert lines are shorter than the
width of the carriageway and the shoulders and
thus the road becomes narrower at culvert
crossings which reduces riding comfort
4) The majority of culverts are partially blocked
while a few are totally blocked by silting and
vegetation particularly where the velocities are
low.
5) The majority of culverts have adequate cover but
a number of lines have very little cover and thus
are exposed to damage by the traffic
6) Almost 50% of the culvert lines have missing end
structures, making them less safe for motorized
traffic especially at high speed
7) The anti-scour structures in the form of aprons
and rip rap protection are missing in about 50%
of the culverts
8) Where the side drains have been lined using
stone pitching, the drainage is evidently efficient
9) There is only one box culvert and it is on the
Busia-Majanji road link

3. Recommended drainage structures by the Design Consultant have been indicated and the
table below presents the summary of quantities of the design and design review status:
Design Consultant
Pipe culverts
Quantity
Single 900 mm
53
Twin 900 mm
7
Single 1050mm
7
Twin 1050mm
1
Single 1200 mm
4
Twin 1200 mm
4
Box culverts
2mx2m single cell
3m x2m single cell

6
3

Design Review
Pipe culverts
Single 900 m m
Twin 900 mm
Single 1200 mm
Twin 1200 mm

Box culverts: 2000 x1500 mm high


Single cell
Twin cell
3

Quantity
29
7
7
3

13
12

Design Consultant
4m x2m single cell
4
4mx2m twin cell
3
4m x2.5m single cell
3
4m x2.5m twin cell

Design Review
Triple cell

4. The resulting drawings in the design review give an interpretation of the revised hydraulic
structures which were determined through a review by Dr Michael Kizza.

Introduction

The Drainage structures design review is assigned to the Consultant teams Drainage Engineer. The
review is based on a consideration of the Design Consultants Final Report, drawings as well as on
information contained in UNRAs documents for Consultancy Services for Feasibility Study, Detailed
Engineering Design, Tender Assistance and Project Management for Upgrading of Roads to
Bituminous Standards: Lot E Roads. The two relevant ToRs in the assignment for the design review
phase are:
vii.

Inspect all drainage structures and design all remedial works or replacement drainage elements
including outfalls
Inspect all bridges, prepare report and design minor repair works

viii.

The designs were prepared by Smec in association with New Plan. The procedure for design of road
drainage structures in Uganda is set out in the Road Design Manual Volume 2 Drainage Design, Ministry
of Works, Housing and Communications, updated 2010. The six particular documents that formed the
basis for the review include the following:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

Detailed Design Report Pkg 1: Road E1.1/E1.2 - Musita-Lumino/Busia-Majanji: Hydrology Report


V1
Design Drawings
ToR for the Design Review assignment
MoW&T 2010 Vol2 Drainage Design Manual
The Hydrology/Hydraulics studies Design Review Report by Eng Dr Michael Kizza
UNRA Notes on Value Engineering Rev A

Overview of the Drainage Design Report

2.1
Design Consultants categorisation of drainage structures
The design Consultant classified all drainage structures into two broad categories of major and minor
with major structures comprising: Bridges, Slab culverts, and Box culverts. The minor structures are
named as: concrete or metallic single or multiple cell openings and all the road side drainage facilities.
2.2 Existing drainage structures
The report has presented a summary of the findings by category and state of the existing drainage
structures; however, due to non availability of Appendix 5A, 5B of the Design Report this review could
not readily verify the information contained in the summary.
2.3 BoQ Value of Structures (Series 6000)
The items under structures have been included in the BoQ in line with the MoWT General Specifications
for Road and Bridge Works. The Construction contract document has Ushs 2,659,781,300 as the
quoted price for the Series 6ooo pay items. This design review sets out to design the recommended
structures up to cost estimates using the construction contract rates.

2.4 Recommended drainage structures


The Design report gives the following summary of culverts and box culverts:

The design review compares elsewhere the Hydrologists recommendations with the above.

2.5

Summary of the Design Engineers findings:

The design reviewer has read the design Consultants findings including a summary on page 38 in the
Final Design Report and below is the design reviews understanding of the situation at the time of
design phase:
1) Poor state of the drainage structures was reported to be a major issue along the road
contributing to the road damage;
2) Majority of the facilities were found inadequate
3) There are several locations of marshes and swampy stretches through which the road
traverses being overtopped during the regular rainy seasons
4) Inadequate hydraulic capacity has led to the addition of culvert lines alongside existing ones;
however, the works have reduced the riding quality of the road without effectively addressing
the capacity problem
5) The cover over most of the pipe culverts has been worn off leading to broken culvert pipe lines
6) Where the length of the pipe culvert lines is shorter than the road carriageway, the road
becomes narrowed in width
7) The construction of the drainage structures is poor and regular maintenance is lacking
8) Some of the structures have outlived their service life
9) The poor quality of the elements have led to poor structural capacity of a number of pipe
culvert lines.
10) There are no existing bridges on any of the two Musita-Lumino and Busia-Majanji road links

3
3.1

Design Review
Design Review Methodology

This review is firstly aimed at presenting the current state of functionality and structural integrity of
the existing structures (as highlighted in the foregoing section), and, secondly highlights the Review
Consultants findings regarding the proposed designs of the drainage structures on MusitaLumino/Busia-Majanj/Busia_Majanji road. Therefore the aspects considered in this review include:
1) Summary of the Design Review Consultants field assessment of the current state of the
existing drainage structures
2) Review of the standards and /or departures adopted by the Design Consultant
3) Review of the appropriateness of the design and details for the drainage structures, the
resulting quantities and completeness of the designs

3.2

Summary of the Design Review Consultants Field Assessment of the current state of
the existing drainage structures

The field assessment was conducted through physical visual observation and measurements from the
start to the end of the project road. The assessment focused on: physical condition and cause of
deterioration/damage, and possible improvements for traffic safety. The two tables in 1/ 3.1 presents
a summary of the findings with photographic evidence for the two road links (Musita-Lumino and
Busia-Majanji); however, the following is a snapshot of the findings:
1) The predominant size of the pipe culverts is 600 mm diameter in concrete; only a few are 900
and none bigger than that.
2) Majority of culvert lines are shorter than the width of the carriageway and the shoulders and
thus the road becomes narrower at culvert crossings which reduces riding comfort
3) The majority of culverts have adequate cover but a number of lines have very little cover and
thus are exposed to damage by the traffic
4) Almost 50% of the culvert lines have missing end structures, making them less safe for
motorized traffic especially at high speed
5) The majority of culverts are partially blocked while a few are totally blocked by silting and
vegetation particularly where the velocities are low.
6) The anti-scour structures in the form of aprons and rip rap protection are missing in about 50%
of the culverts
7) Regular or routine maintenance is missing and therefore the asset has deteriorated much
more than if there was deliberate road overseer work supported by spot repairs
8) Where the side drains have been lined using stone pitching, the drainage is evidently efficient
9) There is only one box culvert and it is on the Busia-Majanji road link
The table 3.1 below hence summarises and compares the findings by the design consultant and the
design review consultant.

Table 3.1 Comparison of Current State of Existing Structures


Design Consultants findings
11) Poor state of the drainage structures was reported
to be a major issue along the road contributing to
the road damage;
12) Majority of the facilities were found inadequate
13) Where the length of the pipe culvert lines is shorter
than the road carriageway, the road becomes
narrowed in width
14) There are several locations of marshes and swampy
stretches through which the road traverses being
overtopped during the regular rainy seasons
15) The cover over most of the pipe culverts has been
worn off leading to broken culvert pipe lines
16) Inadequate hydraulic capacity has led to the
addition of culvert lines alongside existing ones;
however, the works have reduced the riding quality
of the road without effectively addressing the
capacity problem
17) The construction of the drainage structures is poor
and regular maintenance is lacking
18) Some of the structures have outlived their service
life
19) The poor quality of the elements have led to poor
structural capacity of a number of pipe culvert lines.
20) There are no existing bridges on any of the two
Musita-Lumino and Busia-Majanji road links

Design Review Consultants findings


10) Regular or routine maintenance is missing and
therefore the asset has deteriorated much more
than if there was deliberate road overseer work
supported by spot repairs
11) The predominant size of the pipe culverts is 600
mm diameter in concrete; only a few are 900 and
none bigger than that.
12) Majority of culvert lines are shorter than the
width of the carriageway and the shoulders and
thus the road becomes narrower at culvert
crossings which reduces riding comfort
13) The majority of culverts are partially blocked
while a few are totally blocked by silting and
vegetation particularly where the velocities are
low.
14) The majority of culverts have adequate cover but
a number of lines have very little cover and thus
are exposed to damage by the traffic
15) Almost 50% of the culvert lines have missing end
structures, making them less safe for motorized
traffic especially at high speed
16) The anti-scour structures in the form of aprons
and rip rap protection are missing in about 50%
of the culverts
17) Where the side drains have been lined using
stone pitching, the drainage is evidently efficient
18) There is only one box culvert and it is on the
Busia-Majanji road link

3.3

Review of the Standards and /or Departures adopted by the Design Consultant

3.3.1 Culvert pipes


The design review is not focused on interrogating the design Consultants design philosophy or
efficiency of the structures as this is the domain of the design review hydrology/hydraulic specialist.
This review is for examining and reporting on the structural designs and details comparing them with
standard guidelines and best practice.
3.3.1.1
Minimum and Maximum Size set
The design has adopted 900 mm diam as the minimum size for the concrete cross and relief culverts
based on UNRA guidelines. This is commendable since any size below 900 mm diameter presents
maintenance problems as smaller sizes require more regular maintenance to stay efficient; moreover,
numerous lines may be required to be clustered to meet the hydraulic capacity at a given water body
crossing.
The review has shown that the design does not use culverts bigger than 1200 mm diam, preferring to
use box culverts for bigger structures. This is commendable
3.3.1.1.1
Pipe Bedding
The design adopts three standards for bedding namely Class A, B and C and leaves the use of one or
the other to the supervising consultant based on the nature of the foundation material encountered.
3.3.1.2 Material for Headwall set
The design uses solely concrete headwall for the culvert pipe ends, the relatively higher cost than if
stone or concrete block / brick masonry was adopted notwithstanding. The designer has justified his
decision based on two major considerations namely:
1) That concrete is a better quality material than brick or stone masonry, and
2) That UNRA had recommended use of concrete.
It is true that concrete for headwall and other end structures has superior properties and quality and
the design review designs have also adopted the same material.
3.3.1.2.1 Flare Angle of Wingwall
The design has set 450 as flare angle as recommended by MOWT Road and Bridge design Vol. 2
Drainage Design Guidelines for culverts up to 1200 mm diameter.
3.3.1.3 Drop Inlet
The design has prepared a sound solution for a drop inlet. The bottom and side walls are made of
concrete grade 25/20 reinforced with rebars. The details are found to be sufficient to enable the
contractor to prepare shop/production drawings.
3.3.2 Box culverts
The designer adopted a single size (2000mm) for the inner cell width and 1300 mm as internal clear
height. The hydrology/hydraulic design reviewer has extensively examined and reported on the
original designs.
9

3.3.2.1 Detailing
The design presents a single cell, double cell and triple cell box culvert, very well detailed. This review
finds the structural design and detailing of the barrel, wingwalls at a 300 flare recommended by UNRA,
head wall, and apron adequate; however, in line with the design review, a completely different size of
culvert module has been adopted.
3.3.3

Side drains

3.3.3.1 Urban/Trading Centres Drain type


The approach adopted by the design consultant was to use a rectangular section concrete side drain
in trading centres. Where side /service roads have been designed the drainage is enhanced by curb
openings to enable water to flow from the main road across on to the service road and into the drain.
A cast iron grating is proposed for pedestrian crossing.
3.3.3.2 Rural drains
Three types have been adopted. All of them are lined using stone pitching and comprise:
Type A paved channel gutter which essentially is a 1000 mm wide inclined flat gutter with a rock
masonry at the far end.
Type B- paved channel, 1000 mm wide for flows exceeding the erosion velocity or where the slope
exceeds 3%.
Type C- Trapezoidal channel with a 500 mm wide base.
It is noted that the design does not explicitly include unlined side drains. These are useful as mitre
drains or offshoots and as main channels in rolling terrain.
3.4 Recommended Drainage structures
Section 2.4 above shows the design consultants summary of drainage structures. Herebelow is a
summary by number of lines of the same based on the design review:
Table 3.2: Summary by number of lines for the pipe and box culverts
Drainage Structure
Musita-Lumino Busia-Majanji
Single 900 mm dia
13
16
Double 900 mm dia
5
2
Pipe Culverts
Single 1200 mm dia
5
2
Double 1200 mm dia
3
Single cell
9
4
Box culverts
Double cell
10
2
2000x1500 high
Triple cell
1
-

The design review demonstrates a significant difference in the overall quantities of the pipe culverts
and box culverts from the original design as in the comparison table below:
10

Table 3.3: Comparison of original and design review quantities of pipe and box culverts

Design Consultant
Pipe culverts
Quantity
Single 900 mm
53
Twin 900 mm
7
Single 1050mm
7
Twin 1050mm
1
Single 1200 mm
4
Twin 1200 mm
4
Box culverts
2mx2m single cell
3m x2m single cell
4m x2m single cell
4mx2m twin cell
4m x2.5m single cell
4m x2.5m twin cell

6
3
4
3
3
3

Design Review
Pipe culverts
Single 900 m m
Twin 900 mm
Single 1200 mm
Twin 1200 mm

Box culverts: 2000 x1500 mm high


Single cell
Twin cell
Triple cell

Quantity
29
7
7
3

13
12
1

3.5

Review of the Appropriateness of the Design and Details for the Drainage structures, the
resulting quantities and Completeness of the Designs
The design review has established that the original designs are well prepared and are able to give
sufficient information for the contractor to prepare production drawings for the drainage structures.
A few areas have been identified as having facts that are incorrectly derived as presented in the table
3.4 below.
Table 3.4 Findings on Completeness of Design and Detail of the Drainage structures

Structural element designed Major features


Remarks
by Design Consultant
900 mm diam Pipe culvert
Concrete class 25/20; cover 1. Longitudinal section to be revised to
to steel-25 mm; steel single
show single layer
layer of 6mm Diam Mild steel 2. Quantity of concrete m3/m = 25
3. Quantity of rebars kG/m = 13
End structures for pipe culvert Where applicable, drop inlet The detailing is complete
provided; concrete aprons
provided, head wall and
wing walls are provided
Box culvert
2000 x 1500 mm high internal The detailing is complete
dimensions, endwalls and
apron plus riprap outfall
Rectangular section concrete Complete with cast iron Cast iron grating is vulnerable to vandalism
culvert
grating heavy duty
due to high demand of steel products for
ingots for steel rolling mills. Recommend
concrete covers for sustainability
11

Review outcomes

Based on the sizes for pipe culverts, box culverts, and concrete lined and stone pitched drains from a
fresh study/investigation by the hydrology/hydraulics review expert Dr Kizza, the drainage engineer
proceeded to prepare fresh drawings for the drainage structures. The full details are presented in the
book of drawings Appendix 1-4.0 and these drawings will be the basis for the overall design review,
cost review and for the contractor to prepare the production drawings.
4.1 Major structures re-designed
The summary of structures by category for Musita-Lumino and Busia-Majanji road links is presented in
the tables1 below:
Musita-Lumino culvert crossings
Musita-Lumino
Left Drains
Right drains
Total
12,588
10,483
23,071
25,118
26,751
51,869
9,640
8,560
18,200

Lining type
Grass
Stone pitching
Concrete
Total

47,346

45,794

Percent
25%
56%
20%

93,140

100%

Musita-Lumino side drains


Musita-Lumino

Culvert Size

Number

Percent

Circular 900mm diameter

26

41%

Circular 1200mm diameter

17

27%

Box 1.5m high x2.0m wide

20

32%

Total no of crossings

63

100%

Busia-Majanji culvert crossings


Busia-Majanji
Number
Percent
18
69%
2
8%
6
23%
26
100%

Culvert Size
Circular 900mm diameter
Circular 1200mm diameter
Box 1.5m high x2.0m wide
Total no of crossings

Side drains on Busia-Majanji Road


Lining type
Grass
Stone pitching
Concrete
Total
1

Left Drains
2,829
8,891
2,420
14,140

Source: Design Review Report by Dr Michael Kizza

12

Busia-Majanji
Right drains
4,543
8,401
1,640
14,584

Total
7,372
17,292
4,060
28,724

Conclusion
1.

2.

3.
4.
5.

The design review has examined the original drawings and details of the culverts and box
culverts, as well as drains and the end structures namely headwall, wing wall at 450 and 300
flare, drop inlets, aprons and anti-scour measures. It was established that the steel and the
concrete quantities for the 900 mm diam culvert had been underestimated; secondly the
section shows double layers whereas there should be a single layer of steel fabric.
The design for a cast iron grill over the concrete drains in urban /trading centres is found not
recommended on the grounds that these covers would be highly vulnerable to vandalism for
scrap steel. Instead the review has detailed a precast concrete cover.
The design review has introduced a 1200 diam concrete culvert
The design review has introduced a grass lined or earth drain for rural areas for side drains
and mitres drains / offshoots for section of low velocities.
A set of drawings has been prepared as part of this review exercise.

13

APPENDIX 1-3.1 (a)


FINDINGS FROM THE FIELD ASSESSMENT OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR MUSITA -LUMINO ROAD
LINK

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
0+460 FW

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Partially blocked by silt
and debris. Extend and
construct
end
structures

Description

Photographs

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe culvert, Length
7.9m

0+600 LHS

In need of cleaning and


construction of end
structures

Access
culvert:
600mm, Armco
pipe culvert
Length 5.1m

0+750 RHS

In
need
cleaning/desilting
construction of
structures

Access
culvert:450mm,
concrete
pipe
culvert
Length 3.6m

of
and
end

14

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK

0+755 LHS

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Sound and efficient

1+600 FW

In need of cleaning

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe culvert, Length
8.2m

1+735 FW

In need of repair to
apron

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe culvert, Length
8.8m

2+560 FW

Almost fully silted; in


need of desilting and
cleaning of apron

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe culvert, Length
8.6m

Chainage

Description

Photographs

Access
culvert:600mm,
concrete
pipe
culvert
Length 6.1m

15

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
3+140 FW

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
This is duct for the high
pressure water main

Description

Photographs

Cross
culvert:450mm
concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.2m

5+020 FW

Silted and in need of


desilting and cleaning of
the aprons

Cross
culvert:600mm
concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.5m

5+060 FW

Partially (50%) silted ;


broken
headwall
,
extend either end and
wing walls to be
replaced;.
regular
maintenance of the
aprons

Cross
culvert:600mm
concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
7.8m

5+533 FW

Sound ; however in
need
o
regular
maintenance

Cross
culvert:600mm
concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
9.1m

16

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
5+540 FW

6+6
63 FW

6+714 FW

6+727 FW

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Partially silted; in need
of desilting, extension
to either end and
construction of end
structures

Description

Photographs

Cross
culvert:600mm
concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
7.9m

Shorter
than
carriageway width; over
50% silted and in need of
extension to both ends
complete with end
structures

Cross
culvert:600mm
concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
6.8m

In need of extension at
either end, construction
od end structures and
maintenance

Cross
culvert:600mm
concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
7.7m

Sound but in need of


regular maintenance at
the aprons

Cross
culvert:600mm
concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.1m

17

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
6+750 FW

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Lengthen by extension
since being knocked by
vehicles, and keep
regular maintenance

Description

Photographs

Cross
culvert:600mm
concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
7.8m

6+980 FW

Sound
but needs
regular maintenance

Cross
culvert:600mm
concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.0m

7+110 FW

Sound
but
maintenance

needs

Cross
culvert:600mm
concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.0m

7+138 FW

Extend either end by 1 m

Cross
culvert:600mm
concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
7.7m

18

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
7+160 FW

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Desilt
and
keep
maintenance

Description

Photographs

Cross
culvert:600mm
concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.4m

10+520 FW

Desilt
and
keep
maintenance , the soil is
kept stable by the grass
roots

Cross
culvert:600mm
concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
9.0m

11+261 FW

Short but self-cleansing

Skew
culvert:600mm
concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
7.6m

11+269 FW

Self-cleansing

Skew
culvert:600mm
concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.3m

19

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
11+269 FW

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Sound state

Description

Photographs

Skew
culvert:600mm
concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length 8.3m

11+465

Sound condition but


needs maintenance

Type/material:
C.P.C, relief culvert
Diameter: 450mm
Length: 10.4m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitched and
good condition.
Performance:
flowing
water,
vegetation
blockage

11+680

Poor
maintenance
leading to blockage by
silt

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 8.5m
Head/wing
wall:
stoned pitched and
good condition.
Performance:
blocked

20

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
11+688

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
End wall repairs needed
and regular
maintenance lacking

Description

Photographs

Type/material:
C.P.C, relief culvert
Diameter: 900mm
Length: 8.4m
Head/wing
wall:
concrete and poor
condition.
Performance: silted

13+150

Sound physical state

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 450mm
Length: 8.4m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitched and
good condition.
Performance:
flowing water,

14+226

Needs regular
maintenance

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 600mm
double barrel
Length: 8.0m
Head/wing
wall:
concrete and good
condition.
Performance:
flowing water but
partially blocked

21

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
14+238

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Needs construction of
end structures

Description

Photographs

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 6.9m
Head/wing wall: no
headwalls.
Performance:
flowing water

15+870 FW

Sound although shorter


than carriageway and
shoulders by 1 m each
end, given that speeds
on this stretch are high

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe culvert, Length
7.5m

16+837 FW

Sound but in need of


cleaning; extend by 1 m
either end to cater for
relatively high speeds
on this stretch

Cross
culvert
600mm
C.P.C,
Length 7.5m

22

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
sound

16+956 FW

18+180 LHS

Photographs

Skew culvert(relief
culvert) 600mm
C.P.C, Length 8.3m

Sound

Access
culvert
600mm
C.P.C
Length 5.7m Offset
5.7m

Over 80% silted and


drop
inlet
needs
desilting

Skew culvert(relief
culvert) 600mm
C.P.C, Length 9.1m

17+920 RHS

18+170 FW

Description

Offshoot draining
water
towards
Mpungwe
Secondary School

23

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
18+803 FW

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Partially silted (about 60
to 70%) but strong .
needs extension by 1 m
at either end to cope
with the high speeds
and large sugar cane
carrying trucks along
this stretch

Description

Photographs

Cross
culvert
600mm
C.P.C,
Length 7.2m

18+810 FW

Almost fully silted; to be


desilted and extended
by 1 m either end

Cross
culvert
600mm
C.P.C,
Length 7.2m

19+717 FW

Sound and clean

Cross
culvert
,900mm
C.P.C,
Length 8.1m

Sound end structures


but
needs
regular
maintenance

Access
culvert
600mm
C.P.C
Length 7.7m

20+033 RHS

24

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
20+88620+930 RHS

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Outfall needs repair to
check scour and gorge
formation

Description

Photographs

Stone pitched drain


Length -44m
Width -1.65m

20+88620+911 LHS

Needs cleaning

Stone pitched drain


Length -25m
Width -1.60m

20+874 RHS

Sound

Access
culvert,
300mm
C.P.C,
Length 6.2m, Offset
of 3.3m from new
centreline

20+910 FW

Inefficient size although


working. This needs
replacement

Cross
culvert,
450mm
C.P.C,
Length 10.4m

25

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
21+105 FW

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Sound
but
needs
cleaning the apron and
outfall

Description

Photographs

Cross
culvert
600mm C.P.C
Length 8.0m

22+320 FW

Sound

Cross culvert 900mm


C.P.C,
Length 8.2m

22+330 FW

Over 80% silted and in


need of end structures

Cross
culvert600mm
C.P.C,
Length 8.3m

22+660 RHS

Sound

Access
culvert600mm
C.P.C,
Length 6.3m, Offset
of 10.5m

26

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK

24+000 FW

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Sound form

25+820 FW

Sound form

Cross
culvert,
900mm
C.P.C,
Length 7.7m

28+655 FW

Sound
but
almost
flowing full barrel

Cross
culvert,
600mm
C.P.C,
Length 7.6m

Chainage

Description

Photographs

Cross
culvert,
900mm
C.P.C,
Length 8.1m

27

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
29+480 FW

29+986 FW

30+903

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Sound but in need of
end
structures
to
improve safety

Description

Photographs

Cross
culvert,
900mm
C.P.C,
Length 8.2m

Needs desilting

Skew
(Relief)
culvert, 600mm
C.P.C, Length 8.6m.
Stone pitched head
and wing walls.
Fully silted

Needs desilting and


regular maintenance

Skew
(Relief)
culvert, 900mm
C.P.C, Length 9.2m.
Concrete head and
wing walls.
Partially silted with
vegetation
blockage

28

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
31+181

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Provide end structures
at the outlet to improve
safety and efficiency

Description

Photographs

Relief
culvert,
600mm
C.P.C,
Length 9.65m.
Stone pitched head
and wing walls at
the inlet.
No head/wing walls
at the oulet.

31+975

Provide a rip rap outfall


mat to prevent further
scour

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 8.3m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitched and
in good condition.
Performance:
no
vegetation
or
sediment blockage

32+335

Further improvement
can be gained by placing
rip rap on the toe of the
apron

Type/material:
C.P.C, relief culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 10.1m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitched and
in good condition.
Performance:
no
vegetation
or
sediment blockage

29

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
32+860

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Desilt and exercise
regular maintenance

Description

Photographs

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 8.0m
Head/wing
wall:
concrete and in
good condition.
Performance:
sediment blockage

33+383

Efficient hydraulics but


improve by wing wall
and apron repair with
emphasis on riprap or
gabion mattress at the
outfall

Type/material:
C.P.C, relief culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 9.2m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitched and
broken.
Performance:
flowing water

34+340

Swamp raising, replace


broken end structure

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 6.4m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitched and
broken.
Performance:
flowing water

30

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
34+347

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Extend the ends by 1 m,
construct
end
structures

Description

Photographs

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 7.9m
No Head/wing wall
Performance:
flowing water

34+350

Extend outlet end by 1 m


and construct end
structures

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 7.9m
Head/wing wall at
Inlet: stone pitched
and good condition.
No Head/wing wall
at outlet
Performance:
flowing water

34+461

Sound but I need of


regular maintenance

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 900mm
Length: 8.4m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitched and
good condition.
Performance:
flowing
water,
vegetation
blockage

31

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
34+466

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Sound form but needs
maintenance

Description

Photographs

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 900mm
Length: 8.5m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitched and
good condition.
Performance:
flowing
water,
vegetation
blockage

34+470

Needs river training to


improve flow and end
structures

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 8.4m
Head/wing wall at
outlet:
stone
pitched and good
condition.
No Head/wing wall
at intlet
Performance:
partial
sediment
blockage

35+823

Sound form

Type/material:
C.P.C, skewed relief
culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 17.7m
Head/wing
wall:
brickwork,
fair
condition.
Performance:
flowing water, no
blockage

32

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK

37+840

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Needs desilting

37+944

Desilt regularly

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length:7.75m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitch, good
condition.
Performance:
flowing
water,
vegetation
blockage

38+750

Desilt and repair broken


end structure

Type/material:
C.P.C, relief culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 8.0m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitched, good
condition.
Performance:
flowing
water,
silted

Chainage

Description

Photographs

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 8.0m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitch, good
condition.
Performance:
flowing
water,
vegetation
and
sediment blockage

33

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
40+003

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Desilt

Description

Photographs

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 8.0m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitched, poor
condition.
Performance:
flowing
water,
partial
sediment
blockage

40+158

Desilt and repair end


structures for safety

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 10.8m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitched, poor
condition.
Performance:
flowing
water,
partial
sediment
blockage

40+268

Needs
shoulder
charging
to
check
erosion behind the end
structures

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 900mm
Length: 8.2m
Head/wing
wall:
concrete,
poor
condition.
Performance:
flowing water

34

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
40+254

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Desilt

Description

Photographs

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 900mm
Length: 8.0m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitched, good
condition.
Performance:
flowing
water,
partial
sediment
blockage

42+387

Needs
shoulder
recharging, apron

Type/material:
C.P.C, skewed relief
culvert
Diameter: 900mm
Length: 7.6m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitched, poor
condition.
Performance:
flowing
water,
partial
sediment
blockage

42+540

Clear vegetation

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 7.8m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitched, good
condition.
Performance:
flowing
water,
partial
sediment
blockage,
vegatation
blockage

35

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
42+521

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Desilt
and
clear
vegetation

Description

Photographs

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 8.0m
Head/wing
wall:
concrete,
fair
condition.
Performance:
flowing
water,
partial
sediment
blockage,
vegatation
blockage

42+675

Desilt
and
vegetation

clear

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 8.2m
Head/wing
wall:
concrete,
good
condition.
Performance:
flowing
water,
partial
sediment
blockage,
vegatation
blockage

42+900

Desilt
and
keep
regularly desilted

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 9.4m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitched, good
condition.
Performance:
flowing
water,
partial
sediment
blockage at inlet
and full blockage at
outlet.

36

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
43+248

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Desilt
and
keep
regularly desilted

Description

Photographs

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 8.4m
Head/wing
wall:
concrete,
good
condition.
Performance:
flowing
water,
partial
sediment
blockage at inlet
and full blockage at
outlet.

43+651

Outfall in need of
strengthening by rip rap
or gabion baskets to
check undermining of
end structure

Type/material:
C.P.C, skewed relief
culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 12.3m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitched, good
condition.
Performance:
flowing water, no
blockage

44+075

Provide rip rap for


outfall to reinforce the
apron

Type/material:
C.P.C, skewed relief
culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 9.3m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitched, poor
condition.
Performance:
flowing water, no
blockage

37

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
44+826

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Desilt
and
keep
regularly maintained

Description

Photographs

Type/material:
C.P.C, skewed relief
culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 11.2m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitched, good
condition.
Performance:
flowing
water,
partial
sediment
blockage

45+125

Repair apron and place


rip rap or gabion
mattress
to
check
underscour

Type/material:
C.P.C, skewed relief
culvert
Diameter: 900mm
Length: 10.6m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitched, good
condition.
Performance:
flowing water, no
blockage

45+294

Regular
required

Type/material:
C.P.C, skewed relief
culvert
Diameter: 900mm
Length: 9.7m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitched,poor
condition.
Performance:
flowing water, no
blockage

maintenance

38

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
45+475

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Desilt and keep regular
maintenance

45+995

Repair
outlet
end
structure
and keep
desilted

47+190

Desilt

Description

Photographs

Type/material:
C.P.C, skewed relief
culvert
Diameter: 900mm
Length: 10.2m
Head/wing
wall:
stone
pitched,
damaged at inlet
Performance:
flowing
water,
partial
sediment
blockage

Type/material:
C.P.C, cross culvert
No. Of barrells: 2
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 10.7m
Head/wing
wall:
stone
pitched,
damaged at outlet
Performance:
flowing
water,
partial
sediment
blockage,
vegetation
blockage
Type/material:
C.P.C, relief culvert
No. Of barrells: 2
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 6.2m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitched, good
condition.
Performance:
flowing
water,
partial
sediment
blockage

39

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
47+441

Physical Condition
proposal
improvement
Repair damaged
structure at inlet
keep desilted

and
for

Description

Photographs

end
and

Type/material:
C.P.C, relief culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 1m
Head/wing
wall:
stone
pitched,
damaged at inlet
Performance:
flowing
water,
partial
sediment
blockage

47+452

Desilt and extend the


outfall

Type/material:
C.P.C, relief culvert
Diameter: 600mm
Length: 6.2m
Head/wing
wall:
stone pitched, good
condition.
Performance:
flowing
water,
partial
sediment
blockage

47+796

Sound form

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.1m,
okay,
ConditionHeadwall- concrete

40

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
48+215

Physical Condition and


proposal
for Description
improvement
Desilt
and
regular Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
maintenance
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.1m,
Conditionfully
blocked
Headwall- concrete

48+172

Desilt and keep regular


maintenance

Skew
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
9.7m,
Condition- halfway
blocked
Headwall- concrete

49+263

Sound form

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
7.7m,
Conditionokay
Headwall-stone
pitching

41

Photographs

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
49+325

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Construct
end
structures and desilt

Description

Photographs

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.9m,
Conditionfully
blocked
No
Headwall

50+277

Sound form

Cross
culvert:
900mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
7.8m,
Conditionokay
Headwall-stone
pitching

50+305

Desilt and keep regular


maintenance

Cross
culvert:
900mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.0m,
Conditionfully
blocked Headwallstone pitching

42

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
52+200

Physical Condition and


proposal
for Description
improvement
Desilt and keep regular Skew
culvert:
600mm metallic
maintenance
pipe
culvert,
Length
9.3m,
Condition- halfway
blocked
Headwall-stone
pitching

52+620

Desilt and keep regular


maintenance

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
7.6m,
Condition- halfway
blocked
Headwall-stone
pitching

52+870

Cut away vegetation,


desilt and keep regular
maintenance

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
9.4m,
Condition- halfway
blocked
Headwall-stone
pitching

43

Photographs

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
52+621

Physical Condition and


proposal
for Description
improvement
Desilt and keep regular Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
maintenance
pipe
culvert,
Length
7.9m,
Condition- halfway
blocked
Headwall-stone
pitching

54+073

Keep desilted regularly

Skew
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
10.0m,
Condition- halfway
blocked
Headwall-stone
pitching

54+088

Keep desilted regularly

Cross
culvert:
900mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
7.8m,
Condition- halfway
blocked
Headwall-stone
pitching

44

Photographs

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
54+102

Physical Condition and


proposal
for Description
improvement
Unblock , desilt and Cross
culvert:
keep
regular 600mm metallic
pipe
culvert,
maintenance
Length
10.6m,
Conditionfully
blocked
Headwall-stone
pitching

54+880

Desilt and keep regular


maintenance

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
7.8m,
Condition- halfway
blocked
Headwall-stone
pitching

56+270

Unblock
desilted

Skew
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.7m,
Conditionfully
blocked
Headwall-stone
pitching

and

keep

45

Photographs

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
57+235

Physical Condition and


proposal
for Description
improvement
Desilt and keep regular Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
maintenance
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.5m,
Conditionfully
blocked
Headwall-concrete

57+770

Unblock
and
keep
desilted regularly

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
7.8m,
Conditionfully
blocked
Headwall-stone
pitching

57+855

Raise the cover to the


culvert, unblock and
keep
regular
maintenance

Skew
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
11.7m,
Conditionfully
blocked
Headwall-stone
pitching

46

Photographs

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
58+590

Physical Condition and


proposal
for Description
improvement
Desilt and keep regular 5No.Cross culvert:
(1No.)900mm,fun
maintenance
ctional
(1No.)600mm,fun
ctional
(3No.)600mm,
fully blocked
concrete
pipe
culverts,
Length
9.4m,
Headwall-concrete

58+605

Desilt and keep regular


maintenance

Cross
culvert:
900mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
9.6m,
Condition- halfway
blocked
Headwall-stone
pitching

58+830

Desilt and keep regular


maintenance

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
7.9m,
Condition- halfway
blocked
Headwall-stone
pitching

47

Photographs

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
59+625

Physical Condition and


proposal
for Description
improvement
Desilt and keep regular Skew
culvert:
600mm concrete
maintenance
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.8m,
Condition- halfway
blocked
Headwallstonepitching

61+700

Construct
end
structures for safety and
desilt

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.0m,
Conditionfully
blocked

63+235

Desilt and keep regular


maintenance

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.6m,
Condition- halfway
blocked
Headwall-stone
pitching

48

Photographs

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
63+250

Physical Condition and


proposal
for Description
improvement
Repair
the
broken Cross
culvert:
headwall, desilt and 600mm concrete
keep
regular pipe
culvert,
Length
8.6m,
maintenance
Conditionfully
blocked
Headwall-stone
pitching

64+433

Sound form

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
7.8m,
Condition- okay
Headwallstonepitching

64+489

Desilt and keep regular


maintenance

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.0m,
Condition- halfway
blocked
Headwallstonepitching

49

Photographs

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
64+800

Physical Condition and


proposal
for Description
improvement
Remove
vegetation, Cross
culvert:
desilt and keep regular 600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
maintenance
Length
7.8m,
Condition- halfway
blocked,
outlet
covered
with
vegetation
Headwall-stone
pitching

64+842

Sound form

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
7.8m,
Condition- okay
Headwall-stone
pitching

65+290

Desilt and keep regular


maintenance

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.8m,
Conditionfully
blocked
Headwall-stone
pitching

50

Photographs

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
65+800

Physical Condition and


proposal
for
improvement
Sound form

Description

Photographs

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.0m,
Condition- okay
Headwall-stone
pitching

66+638

Desilt and keep regular


maintenance

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
7.8m,
Conditionfully
blocked
Headwall-brick
work

66+750

Desilt and keep regular


maintenance

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
13.1m,
Conditionfully
blocked
Headwall- concrete

51

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
66+905

Physical Condition and


proposal
for Description
improvement
Desilt and keep regular Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
maintenance
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.1m,
Condition- half way
blocked
Headwallpitching

67+450

Desilt and keep regular


maintenance

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
7.9m,
Condition- half way
blocked
Headwallpitching

70+126

Desilt and keep regular


maintenance

stone

stone

Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.0m,
Conditionfully
blocked
Headwallpitching

stone

52

Photographs

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
71+135

Physical Condition and


proposal
for Description
improvement
Desilt and keep regular Cross
culvert:
600mm concrete
maintenance
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.0m,
Conditionfully
blocked
Headwallpitching

73+320

Sound

stone

Cross culvert:
(3No.)900mm
(2No.)600mm
concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.1m,
Conditionokay
Headwallpitching

75+727

Sound form

stone

Cross culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.0m,
Condition- okay
Headwallpitching

stone

53

Photographs

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON MUSITA-LUMINO ROAD LINK


Chainage
76+115

Physical Condition
proposal
improvement
Unblock, desilt
repair broken LHS
structure

and
for
and
end

Description
Cross culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
7.9m,
Condition- halfway
blocked,
culvert
broken on the LHS
Headwallwork

0+062
Lumino
Bypass

Repair headwall

Photographs

brick

Cross culvert:
(1No.)900mm
(1No.)600mm
(1No.)450mm
concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
8.7m,
Conditionokay but headwall
damaged at outlet
Headwallpitching

0+430

Desilt and keep regular


maintenance

stone

Skew culvert:
600mm concrete
pipe
culvert,
Length
7.9m,
Condition- halfway
blocked
Headwallpitching

stone

54

APPENDIX 1-3.1 (b)


FINDINGS FROM THE FIELD ASSESSMENT OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR BUSIA -MAJANJI ROAD
LINK
CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON BUSIA-MAJANJI ROAD LINK
Chainage
1+110

Physical Condition
and proposal for
improvement
No wingwalls and
damaged headwall.
Replace
end
structures

Description

Photographs

Cross culvert: 900mm


metallic culvert
Length 8.0m
Condition-headwall
damaged, outlet covered
with vegetation growth
Headwall- stone pitching

1+550

Desilt and carry our


river training

Cross culvert: box culvert


1.0x1.56m, Length 17m
Condition-halfway blocked
Headwall-concrete

4+450

Unblock and keep


regular maintenance

Cross culvert: 450mm


cross pipe culvert
Length 10.8m
Condition-fully blocked
Headwall- concrete

55

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON BUSIA-MAJANJI ROAD LINK


Chainage
5+764

Physical Condition
and proposal for
improvement
Remove vegetation
and keep desilted and
maintained

Description

Photographs

Cross culvert: 600mm


cross pipe culvert
Length 9.2m
Condition- open but outlet
covered with vegetation
Headwall- stone pitching

5+816

Regular maintenance

Cross culvert: 600mm


cross pipe culvert
Length 7.8m
Conditionheadwall
damaged, 30% silted
Headwall- stone pitching

6+980

Regular maintenance

Cross culvert: 900mm


cross pipe culvert
Length 8.7m
Condition- halfway blocked
Headwall- stone pitching

56

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON BUSIA-MAJANJI ROAD LINK


Chainage
8+351

Physical Condition
and proposal for
improvement
Construct
end
structures and desilt

Description

Photographs

Cross culvert: 600mm


cross pipe culvert
Length 9.5m
Condition- halfway blocked
Headwall- stone pitching at
inlet, no headwall at outlet

8+590

Repair broken end


structures and desilt

Cross culvert: 600mm


cross pipe culvert
Length 10.0m
Conditionhalfway
blocked,
headwall
damaged at outlet
Headwall- stone pitching

10+280

Desilt
and
maintained

Cross culvert: probably


(2No.)600mm cross pipe
culvert
Length 8.2m
Condition- fully blocked
Headwall- stone pitching

keep

57

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON BUSIA-MAJANJI ROAD LINK


Chainage
10+310

Physical Condition
and proposal for
improvement
Sound form

Description

Photographs

Cross culvert: 900mm


cross pipe culvert
Length 7.8m
Condition- okay
Headwall- stone pitching

10+880

Desilt
and
keep
regular maintenance

Cross culvert: 600mm


cross pipe culvert
Length 7.8m
Condition- half way blocked
Headwall- stone pitching

11+315

Desilt, clear the inlet


and outlet and keep
regular maintenance

Cross culvert: 600mm


cross pipe culvert
Length 8.6m
Condition- fully blocked
Headwall- brick work

58

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON BUSIA-MAJANJI ROAD LINK


Chainage
11+888

Physical Condition
and proposal for
improvement
Desilt, clear the inlet
and outlet and keep
regular maintenance

Description

Photographs

Cross culvert: probably


(2No.)600mm cross pipe
culvert
Length 8.8m
Condition- fully blocked,
outlet has gabion
Headwall- brick work

14+720

Desilt, clear the inlet


and outlet and keep
regular maintenance

Cross culvert: 900mm


cross pipe culvert
Length 9.7m
Condition- half way blocked
Headwall- stone pitching

15+481

Replace
end
structures and keep
regular maintenance

Cross culvert: 600mm


metallic culvert
Length 8.7m
Condition- open but some
vegetation growth at
outlet
Headwall- stone pitching

59

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON BUSIA-MAJANJI ROAD LINK

16+275

Physical Condition
and proposal for
improvement
Repair the aprons and
reinforce with rip rap
or gabion mattresses
at the outfalls

16+320

Sound form

Cross culvert: 600mm


cross pipe culvert
Length 9.8m
Condition- okay
Headwall- stone pitching

17+390

Desilt, clear the inlet


and outlet and keep
regular maintenance

Cross culvert: probably


(2No.)600mm cross pipe
culvert
Length 7.6m
Condition- fully blocked
Headwall- brick work

Chainage

Description

Photographs

Cross culvert: 600mm


cross pipe culvert
Length 9.8m
Condition- okay
Headwall- concrete

60

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON BUSIA-MAJANJI ROAD LINK


Chainage
17+930

Physical Condition
and proposal for
improvement
Sound
form
but
improve by erecting
rip rap for outfall
strengthening

Description

Photographs

Skew culvert: 600mm


metallic culvert
Length 9.5m
Condition- okay
Headwall- stone pitching

19+020

Desilt, clear the inlet


and outlet and keep
regular maintenance

cross culvert: probably


450mm
concrete pipe culvert
Length 10.5m
Condition- fully blocked
Headwall- concrete

20+119

Sound form

cross culvert: 600mm


concrete pipe culvert
Length 7.9m
Condition- okay
Headwall- concrete

61

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON BUSIA-MAJANJI ROAD LINK


Chainage
21+565

Physical Condition
and proposal for
improvement
Clear the vegetation
and keep regular
maintenance

Description

Photographs

Cross
culvert:
(2No.)600mm
concrete pipe culvert
Length 8.8m
Condition- half way blocked
Headwall- stone pitching

21+602

Desilt, clear the inlet


and outlet and keep
regular maintenance

Cross culvert: 600mm


concrete pipe culvert
Length 9.8m
Condition- half way blocked
Headwall- stone pitching

22+193

Desilt, clear the inlet


and outlet and keep
regular maintenance

Cross culvert: 600mm


concrete pipe culvert
Length 7.8m
Condition- fully blocked
Headwall- brick work

62

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON BUSIA-MAJANJI ROAD LINK


Chainage
23+123

Physical Condition
and proposal for
improvement
Desilt, clear the inlet
and outlet and keep
regular maintenance

Description

Photographs

Cross culvert: 450mm


concrete pipe culvert
Length 7.8m
Condition- fully blocked
Headwall- block work

24+301

Desilt, clear the inlet


and outlet and keep
regular maintenance

Cross culvert: 600mm


concrete pipe culvert
Length 7.2m
Condition- fully blocked
Headwall- block work

25+246

Desilt, clear the inlet


and outlet and keep
regular maintenance

Cross culvert: 600mm


metallic culvert
Length 8.9m
Condition- fully blocked
Headwall- block work

63

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON BUSIA-MAJANJI ROAD LINK


Chainage
25+374

Physical Condition
and proposal for
improvement
Sound form but repair
the end structures

Description

Photographs

Cross culvert: 600mm


metallic culvert
Length 8.8m
Condition- okay
Headwall- block work

25+741

Desilt, clear the inlet


and outlet and keep
regular maintenance

Cross culvert: 600mm


Concrete pipe culvert
Length 8.5m
Condition- fully blocked
Headwall- block work

26+100

Desilt, clear the inlet


and outlet and keep
regular maintenance;
repair
the
end
structures

Cross culvert: 600mm


metallic culvert
Length 9.2m
Condition- fully blocked
Headwall- block work

64

CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING CULVERTS ON BUSIA-MAJANJI ROAD LINK


Chainage
26+840

Physical Condition
and proposal for
improvement
Sound form

Description

Photographs

Cross culvert: 600mm


Concrete pipe culvert
Length 10.8m
Condition- okay
Headwall- stone pitching

65

Appendix 1-4.0
Book of drawings

66

DRAWING NUMBER
UNRA/ML-BM/DS:001REV
UNRA/ML-BM/DS:002REV
UNRA/ML-BM/DS:003REV
UNRA/ML-BM/DS:004REV
UNRA/ML-BM/DS:005REV
UNRA/ML-BM/DS:006REV
UNRA/ML-BM/DS:007REV
UNRA/ML-BM/DS:008REV
UNRA/ML-BM/DS:009REV
UNRA/ML-BM/DS:010REV
UNRA/ML-BM/DS:011REV
UNRA/ML-BM/DS:012REV
UNRA/ML-BM/DS:013REV
UNRA/ML-BM/DS:014REV
UNRA/ML-BM/DS:015REV
UNRA/ML-BM/DS:016REV
UNRA/ML-BM/DS:017REV
UNRA/ML-BM/DS:018REV
UNRA/ML-BM/DS:019REV
UNRA/ML-BM/DS:020REV
UNRA/ML-BM/DS:021REV

TITLE
BOX CULVERT GENERAL ARRANGEMENT DRAWING
SINGLE CELL BOX CULVERT DETAILS
DOUBLE CELL VOX CULVERT DETAILS
TRIPLE CELL BOX CULVERT DETAILS
BOX CULVERT WINGWALL DETAILS
BOX CULVERT APRON DETAILS (45 DEGREES)
BOX CULVERT APRON DETAILS (30 DEGREES)
PIPE CULVERT GENERAL ARRANGEMENT DRAWING
PIPE CULVERT END STRUCTURES
DROP INLET DETAILS
BUSIA-MAJANJI END STRUCTURES SCHEDULE
MUSITA-LUMINO END STRUCTURES SCHEDULE
BUSIA-MAJANJI SCOUR PROTECTION DETAIL AND SCHEDULE
MUSITA-LUMINO SCOUR PROTECTION DETAIL AND SCHEDULE

MUSITA-LUMINO STANDARD SIDE DITCH DETAILS AND SCHEDULES.

BUSIA-MANJI STANDARD SIDE DITCH DETAILS AND SCHEDULES.

DESIGN REVIEW CEC / MBW

NEWPLAN Ltd.

SMEC Limited
C:\Users\user\Desktop\Title Block\MBW LOGO.jpg

JULY 2015

DESIGN REVIEW

CEC / MBW

Rev. No.

DATE

Desrcription Of Revision

CONSULTANT

Plot M655
Jasper Close, Naguru,
P.O.Box 41292,
Kampala, Uganda

in association
with

Crusader House,
3 Portal Avenue,
P.O. Box 7544,
Kampala, Uganda

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY


PLOT 11, YUSUF LULE ROAD
P O BOX 28487
KAMPALA - UGANDA
Tel: +256 312 233 100,
Fax: +256 414 232 807
Email: executive@unra.go.ug

DESIGN REVIEW CEC / MBW

NEWPLAN Ltd.

SMEC Limited
C:\Users\user\Desktop\Title Block\MBW LOGO.jpg

1
Rev. No.

JULY 2015
DATE

DESIGN REVIEW

CEC / MBW

Desrcription Of Revision

CONSULTANT

Plot M655
Jasper Close, Naguru,
P.O.Box 41292,
Kampala, Uganda

in association
with

Crusader House,
3 Portal Avenue,
P.O. Box 7544,
Kampala, Uganda

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY


PLOT 11, YUSUF LULE ROAD
P O BOX 28487
KAMPALA - UGANDA
Tel: +256 312 233 100,
Fax: +256 414 232 807
Email: executive@unra.go.ug

DESIGN REVIEW CEC / MBW

NEWPLAN Ltd.

SMEC Limited
C:\Users\user\Desktop\Title Block\MBW LOGO.jpg

1
Rev. No.

JULY 2015
DATE

DESIGN REVIEW

CEC / MBW

Desrcription Of Revision

CONSULTANT

Plot M655
Jasper Close, Naguru,
P.O.Box 41292,
Kampala, Uganda

in association
with

Crusader House,
3 Portal Avenue,
P.O. Box 7544,
Kampala, Uganda

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY


PLOT 11, YUSUF LULE ROAD
P O BOX 28487
KAMPALA - UGANDA
Tel: +256 312 233 100,
Fax: +256 414 232 807
Email: executive@unra.go.ug

DESIGN REVIEW CEC / MBW

NEWPLAN Ltd.

SMEC Limited
C:\Users\user\Desktop\Title Block\MBW LOGO.jpg

1
Rev. No.

JULY 2015
DATE

DESIGN REVIEW

CEC / MBW

Desrcription Of Revision

CONSULTANT

Plot M655
Jasper Close, Naguru,
P.O.Box 41292,
Kampala, Uganda

in association
with

Crusader House,
3 Portal Avenue,
P.O. Box 7544,
Kampala, Uganda

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY


PLOT 11, YUSUF LULE ROAD
P O BOX 28487
KAMPALA - UGANDA
Tel: +256 312 233 100,
Fax: +256 414 232 807
Email: executive@unra.go.ug

DESIGN REVIEW CEC / MBW

NEWPLAN Ltd.

SMEC Limited
C:\Users\user\Desktop\Title Block\MBW LOGO.jpg

1
Rev. No.

JULY 2015
DATE

DESIGN REVIEW

CEC / MBW

Desrcription Of Revision

CONSULTANT

Plot M655
Jasper Close, Naguru,
P.O.Box 41292,
Kampala, Uganda

in association
with

Crusader House,
3 Portal Avenue,
P.O. Box 7544,
Kampala, Uganda

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY


PLOT 11, YUSUF LULE ROAD
P O BOX 28487
KAMPALA - UGANDA
Tel: +256 312 233 100,
Fax: +256 414 232 807
Email: executive@unra.go.ug

DESIGN REVIEW CEC / MBW

NEWPLAN Ltd.

SMEC Limited
C:\Users\user\Desktop\Title Block\MBW LOGO.jpg

1
Rev. No.

JULY 2015
DATE

DESIGN REVIEW

CEC / MBW

Desrcription Of Revision

CONSULTANT

Plot M655
Jasper Close, Naguru,
P.O.Box 41292,
Kampala, Uganda

in association
with

Crusader House,
3 Portal Avenue,
P.O. Box 7544,
Kampala, Uganda

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY


PLOT 11, YUSUF LULE ROAD
P O BOX 28487
KAMPALA - UGANDA
Tel: +256 312 233 100,
Fax: +256 414 232 807
Email: executive@unra.go.ug

DESIGN REVIEW CEC / MBW

NEWPLAN Ltd.

SMEC Limited
C:\Users\user\Desktop\Title Block\MBW LOGO.jpg

1
Rev. No.

JULY 2015
DATE

DESIGN REVIEW

CEC / MBW

Desrcription Of Revision

CONSULTANT

Plot M655
Jasper Close, Naguru,
P.O.Box 41292,
Kampala, Uganda

in association
with

Crusader House,
3 Portal Avenue,
P.O. Box 7544,
Kampala, Uganda

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY


PLOT 11, YUSUF LULE ROAD
P O BOX 28487
KAMPALA - UGANDA
Tel: +256 312 233 100,
Fax: +256 414 232 807
Email: executive@unra.go.ug

DESIGN REVIEW CEC / MBW

NEWPLAN Ltd.

SMEC Limited
C:\Users\user\Desktop\Title Block\MBW LOGO.jpg

1
Rev. No.

JULY 2015
DATE

DESIGN REVIEW

CEC / MBW

Desrcription Of Revision

CONSULTANT

Plot M655
Jasper Close, Naguru,
P.O.Box 41292,
Kampala, Uganda

in association
with

Crusader House,
3 Portal Avenue,
P.O. Box 7544,
Kampala, Uganda

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY


PLOT 11, YUSUF LULE ROAD
P O BOX 28487
KAMPALA - UGANDA
Tel: +256 312 233 100,
Fax: +256 414 232 807
Email: executive@unra.go.ug

DESIGN REVIEW CEC / MBW

NEWPLAN Ltd.

SMEC Limited
C:\Users\user\Desktop\Title Block\MBW LOGO.jpg

1
Rev. No.

JULY 2015
DATE

DESIGN REVIEW

CEC / MBW

Desrcription Of Revision

CONSULTANT

Plot M655
Jasper Close, Naguru,
P.O.Box 41292,
Kampala, Uganda

in association
with

Crusader House,
3 Portal Avenue,
P.O. Box 7544,
Kampala, Uganda

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY


PLOT 11, YUSUF LULE ROAD
P O BOX 28487
KAMPALA - UGANDA
Tel: +256 312 233 100,
Fax: +256 414 232 807
Email: executive@unra.go.ug

DIMENSIONS OF STRUCTURE FOR MULTIPLE PIPES (m)

DIMENSIONS OF STRUCTURE SINGLE PIPE (m)


A

0.60

0.90

1.40

1.90

1.20

2.60

3.20

0.70

0.90

1.30

1.60

1.50

2.15

4.00

4.80

1.00

1.20

1.60

2.05

1.80

2.45

4.90

5.70

1.30

STRUCTURE

A 142 BRC Mesh

ELEVATION
DESIGN REVIEW CEC / MBW

NEWPLAN Ltd.

SMEC Limited
C:\Users\user\Desktop\Title Block\MBW LOGO.jpg

1
Rev. No.

JULY 2015
DATE

DESIGN REVIEW

CEC / MBW

Desrcription Of Revision

CONSULTANT

Plot M655
Jasper Close, Naguru,
P.O.Box 41292,
Kampala, Uganda

in association
with

Crusader House,
3 Portal Avenue,
P.O. Box 7544,
Kampala, Uganda

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY


PLOT 11, YUSUF LULE ROAD
P O BOX 28487
KAMPALA - UGANDA
Tel: +256 312 233 100,
Fax: +256 414 232 807
Email: executive@unra.go.ug

TWIN

0.90

1.60

1.60

2.80

3.65

6.10

6.95

1.30

TRIPLE

0.90

1.60

1.60

4.30

5.15

7.60

8.45

1.30

TWIN

1.20

1.60

2.05

3.40

4.25

6.70

7.55

1.30

TRIPLE

1.20

1.60

2.05

5.20

6.05

8.50

9.35

1.30

DESIGN REVIEW CEC / MBW

NEWPLAN Ltd.

SMEC Limited
C:\Users\user\Desktop\Title Block\MBW LOGO.jpg

1
Rev. No.

JULY 2015
DATE

DESIGN REVIEW

CEC / MBW

Desrcription Of Revision

CONSULTANT

Plot M655
Jasper Close, Naguru,
P.O.Box 41292,
Kampala, Uganda

in association
with

Crusader House,
3 Portal Avenue,
P.O. Box 7544,
Kampala, Uganda

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY


PLOT 11, YUSUF LULE ROAD
P O BOX 28487
KAMPALA - UGANDA
Tel: +256 312 233 100,
Fax: +256 414 232 807
Email: executive@unra.go.ug

DESIGN REVIEW CEC / MBW

NEWPLAN Ltd.

SMEC Limited
C:\Users\user\Desktop\Title Block\MBW LOGO.jpg

1
Rev. No.

JULY 2015
DATE

DESIGN REVIEW

CEC / MBW

Desrcription Of Revision

CONSULTANT

Plot M655
Jasper Close, Naguru,
P.O.Box 41292,
Kampala, Uganda

in association
with

Crusader House,
3 Portal Avenue,
P.O. Box 7544,
Kampala, Uganda

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY


PLOT 11, YUSUF LULE ROAD
P O BOX 28487
KAMPALA - UGANDA
Tel: +256 312 233 100,
Fax: +256 414 232 807
Email: executive@unra.go.ug

DESIGN REVIEW CEC / MBW

NEWPLAN Ltd.

SMEC Limited
C:\Users\user\Desktop\Title Block\MBW LOGO.jpg

1
Rev. No.

JULY 2015
DATE

DESIGN REVIEW

CEC / MBW

Desrcription Of Revision

CONSULTANT

Plot M655
Jasper Close, Naguru,
P.O.Box 41292,
Kampala, Uganda

in association
with

Crusader House,
3 Portal Avenue,
P.O. Box 7544,
Kampala, Uganda

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY


PLOT 11, YUSUF LULE ROAD
P O BOX 28487
KAMPALA - UGANDA
Tel: +256 312 233 100,
Fax: +256 414 232 807
Email: executive@unra.go.ug

DESIGN REVIEW CEC / MBW

NEWPLAN Ltd.

SMEC Limited
C:\Users\user\Desktop\Title Block\MBW LOGO.jpg

1
Rev. No.

JULY 2015
DATE

DESIGN REVIEW

CEC / MBW

Desrcription Of Revision

CONSULTANT

Plot M655
Jasper Close, Naguru,
P.O.Box 41292,
Kampala, Uganda

in association
with

Crusader House,
3 Portal Avenue,
P.O. Box 7544,
Kampala, Uganda

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY


PLOT 11, YUSUF LULE ROAD
P O BOX 28487
KAMPALA - UGANDA
Tel: +256 312 233 100,
Fax: +256 414 232 807
Email: executive@unra.go.ug

DESIGN REVIEW CEC / MBW

NEWPLAN Ltd.

SMEC Limited
C:\Users\user\Desktop\Title Block\MBW LOGO.jpg

1
Rev. No.

JULY 2015
DATE

DESIGN REVIEW

CEC / MBW

Desrcription Of Revision

CONSULTANT

Plot M655
Jasper Close, Naguru,
P.O.Box 41292,
Kampala, Uganda

in association
with

Crusader House,
3 Portal Avenue,
P.O. Box 7544,
Kampala, Uganda

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY


PLOT 11, YUSUF LULE ROAD
P O BOX 28487
KAMPALA - UGANDA
Tel: +256 312 233 100,
Fax: +256 414 232 807
Email: executive@unra.go.ug

DESIGN REVIEW CEC / MBW

NEWPLAN Ltd.

SMEC Limited
C:\Users\user\Desktop\Title Block\MBW LOGO.jpg

1
Rev. No.

JULY 2015
DATE

DESIGN REVIEW

CEC / MBW

Desrcription Of Revision

CONSULTANT

Plot M655
Jasper Close, Naguru,
P.O.Box 41292,
Kampala, Uganda

in association
with

Crusader House,
3 Portal Avenue,
P.O. Box 7544,
Kampala, Uganda

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY


PLOT 11, YUSUF LULE ROAD
P O BOX 28487
KAMPALA - UGANDA
Tel: +256 312 233 100,
Fax: +256 414 232 807
Email: executive@unra.go.ug

DESIGN REVIEW CEC / MBW

NEWPLAN Ltd.

SMEC Limited
C:\Users\user\Desktop\Title Block\MBW LOGO.jpg

1
Rev. No.

JULY 2015
DATE

DESIGN REVIEW

CEC / MBW

Desrcription Of Revision

CONSULTANT

Plot M655
Jasper Close, Naguru,
P.O.Box 41292,
Kampala, Uganda

in association
with

Crusader House,
3 Portal Avenue,
P.O. Box 7544,
Kampala, Uganda

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY


PLOT 11, YUSUF LULE ROAD
P O BOX 28487
KAMPALA - UGANDA
Tel: +256 312 233 100,
Fax: +256 414 232 807
Email: executive@unra.go.ug

DESIGN REVIEW CEC / MBW

NEWPLAN Ltd.

SMEC Limited
C:\Users\user\Desktop\Title Block\MBW LOGO.jpg

1
Rev. No.

JULY 2015
DATE

DESIGN REVIEW

CEC / MBW

Desrcription Of Revision

CONSULTANT

Plot M655
Jasper Close, Naguru,
P.O.Box 41292,
Kampala, Uganda

in association
with

Crusader House,
3 Portal Avenue,
P.O. Box 7544,
Kampala, Uganda

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY


PLOT 11, YUSUF LULE ROAD
P O BOX 28487
KAMPALA - UGANDA
Tel: +256 312 233 100,
Fax: +256 414 232 807
Email: executive@unra.go.ug

DESIGN REVIEW CEC / MBW

NEWPLAN Ltd.

SMEC Limited
C:\Users\user\Desktop\Title Block\MBW LOGO.jpg

1
Rev. No.

JULY 2015
DATE

DESIGN REVIEW

CEC / MBW

Desrcription Of Revision

CONSULTANT

Plot M655
Jasper Close, Naguru,
P.O.Box 41292,
Kampala, Uganda

in association
with

Crusader House,
3 Portal Avenue,
P.O. Box 7544,
Kampala, Uganda

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY


PLOT 11, YUSUF LULE ROAD
P O BOX 28487
KAMPALA - UGANDA
Tel: +256 312 233 100,
Fax: +256 414 232 807
Email: executive@unra.go.ug

DESIGN REVIEW CEC / MBW

NEWPLAN Ltd.

SMEC Limited
C:\Users\user\Desktop\Title Block\MBW LOGO.jpg

1
Rev. No.

JULY 2015
DATE

DESIGN REVIEW

CEC / MBW

Desrcription Of Revision

CONSULTANT

Plot M655
Jasper Close, Naguru,
P.O.Box 41292,
Kampala, Uganda

in association
with

Crusader House,
3 Portal Avenue,
P.O. Box 7544,
Kampala, Uganda

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY


PLOT 11, YUSUF LULE ROAD
P O BOX 28487
KAMPALA - UGANDA
Tel: +256 312 233 100,
Fax: +256 414 232 807
Email: executive@unra.go.ug

DESIGN REVIEW CEC / MBW

NEWPLAN Ltd.

SMEC Limited
C:\Users\user\Desktop\Title Block\MBW LOGO.jpg

1
Rev. No.

JULY 2015
DATE

DESIGN REVIEW

CEC / MBW

Desrcription Of Revision

CONSULTANT

Plot M655
Jasper Close, Naguru,
P.O.Box 41292,
Kampala, Uganda

in association
with

Crusader House,
3 Portal Avenue,
P.O. Box 7544,
Kampala, Uganda

UGANDA NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY


PLOT 11, YUSUF LULE ROAD
P O BOX 28487
KAMPALA - UGANDA
Tel: +256 312 233 100,
Fax: +256 414 232 807
Email: executive@unra.go.ug