32078 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.
111 / Monday, June 11, 2007 / Notices
Dated: June 4, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–11248 Filed 6–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
University of Miami, et al.; Notice of
Consolidated Decision on Applications
for Duty-Free Entry of Electron
Microscopes
This is a decision consolidated
pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural
Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.
L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106–
36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301).
Related records can be viewed between
8:30 a.m.. and 5 p.m. in Room 2104,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and
Constitution Avenue., NW.,
Washington, DC.
Docket Number: 07–023. Applicant:
University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL.
Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model
JEM–1400. Manufacturer: JEOL, USA,
Inc., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at
72 FR 27076, May 14, 2007. Order Date:
September 27, 2006.
Docket Number: 07–024. Applicant:
Shriners Hospitals for Children,
Portland, OR. Instrument: Transmission
Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI,
Company, The Netherlands. Intended
Use: See notice at 72 FR 27076, May 14,
2007. Order Date: December 20, 2006.
Docket Number: 07–027. Applicant:
University of Missouri-Columbia,
Columbia, MO. Instrument:
Transmission Electron Microscope,
Model JEM -1400. Manufacturer: JEOL,
Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 72 FR
27076, May 14, 2007. Order Date:
January 10, 2007.
Docket Number: 07–028. Applicant:
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Instrument: Transmission Electron
Microscope, Model FP 5005/05.
Manufacturer: FEI, Brno, Czech
Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 72
FR 27076, May 14, 2007. Order Date:
December 20, 2006.
Comments: None received. Decision:
Approved. No instrument of equivalent
scientific value to the foreign
instrument, for such purposes as these
instruments are intended to be used,
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
was being manufactured in the United
States at the time the instruments were
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign
instrument is an electron microscope
and is intended for research or scientific
educational uses requiring an electron
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:28 Jun 08, 2007 Jkt 211001
microscope. We know of no electron
microscope, or any other instrument
suited to these purposes, which was
being manufactured in the United States
at the time of order of each instrument.
Dated: June 5, 2007.
Faye Robinson,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. E7–11234 Filed 6–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE.
International Trade Administration
C–357–813
Honey from Argentina: Final Results of
Full Sunset Review of the
Countervailing Duty Order
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On February 28, 2007, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published in the Federal
Register the preliminary results of the
full sunset review of the countervailing
duty (CVD) order on Honey from
Argentina, pursuant to section 751(c) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act). As a result of our analysis, the
Department preliminarily found that
revocation of the countervailing duty
order would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of a
countervailable subsidy.
We provided interested parties an
opportunity to comment on our
preliminary results. However, we
received no comments from interested
parties. As a result, the final results
remain the same as the preliminary
results of this review.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 11, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elfi
Blum or Dana Mermelstein, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 6, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0197 or (202) 482–
1391, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
February 28, 2007, the Department
published its Preliminary Results of Full
Sunset Review: Countervailing Duty
Order on Honey from Argentina, 72 FR
8970 (February 28, 2007) (Preliminary
Results). In our Preliminary Results, we
found that revocation of the order
would likely lead to continuation or
recurrence of a countervailable subsidy
on the subject merchandise.
Interested parties were invited to
comment on our Preliminary Results.
PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
The Department received no comments
from either the domestic interested
parties or respondent interested parties.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order is artificial honey containing more
than 50 percent natural honeys by
weight, preparations of natural honey
containing more than 50 percent natural
honeys by weight, and flavored honey.
The subject merchandise includes all
grades and colors of honey whether in
liquid, creamed, combs, cut comb, or
chunk form, and whether packaged for
retail or in bulk form. The merchandise
subject to this order is currently
classifiable under subheadings
0409.00.00, 1702.90, and 2106.90.99 of
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) purposes, the
Department’s written description of the
merchandise covered by this order is
dispositive.
Final Results of Review
As stated in the Preliminary Results,
the Department determined that
revocation of the countervailing duty
order would likely lead to continuation
or recurrence of a countervailable
subsidy. In addition, we preliminarily
determined that the net countervailable
subsidy likely to prevail if the order
were revoked is 5.85 percent. As we did
not receive any comments from any
interested parties regarding the
Preliminary Results, we have no reason
to reconsider our preliminary decision.
International Trade Commission (ITC)
Notification
In accordance with section 752(b)(3)
of the Act, we will notify the ITC of the
final results of this full sunset review.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APO)
of their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with section 351.305 of the
Department’s regulations. Timely
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this
determination and notice in accordance
with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i) of
the Act.
11JNN1