This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Are industrial clusters going international? The case of Italian SMEs in Romania
UNIVERSITÀ DELL'INSUBRIA FACOLTÀ DI ECONOMIA
In questi quaderni vengono pubblicati i lavori dei docenti della Facoltà di Economia dell’Università dell’Insubria. La pubblicazione di contributi di altri studiosi, che abbiano un rapporto didattico o scientifico stabile con la Facoltà, può essere proposta da un professore della Facoltà, dopo che il contributo sia stato discusso pubblicamente. Il nome del proponente è riportato in nota all'articolo. I punti di vista espressi nei quaderni della Facoltà di Economia riflettono unicamente le opinioni degli autori, e non rispecchiano necessariamente quelli della Facoltà di Economia dell'Università dell'Insubria. These Working papers collect the work of the Faculty of Economics of the University of Insubria. The publication of work by other Authors can be proposed by a member of the Faculty, provided that the paper has been presented in public. The name of the proposer is reported in a footnote. The views expressed in the Working papers reflect the opinions of the Authors only, and not necessarily the ones of the Economics Faculty of the University of Insubria.
© Copyright Antonio Majocchi Printed in Italy in July 2000 Università degli Studi dell'Insubria Via Ravasi 2, 21100 Varese, Italy All rights reserved. No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form without permission of the Author.
ARE INDUSTRIAL CLUSTERS GOING INTERNATIONAL? THE CASE OF ITALIAN SMEs IN ROMANIAΚ Antonio Majocchi* July 2000
The paper analyses the process of internationalisation realized by Italian SMEs coming from industrial districts and locating in the northwestern part of Romania. The case studies show how small firms tend to replicate, on an international scale, the relationships developed in the source districts, thus developing international networks that overcome the classical hurdles to growth that mainly affect small firms.
During the Nineties a growing number of studies have shown how internationalisation strategies have been significantly pursued not only by large firms but also by an increasing number of small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs). Consequently, a large number of studies have been devoted to analyzing this phenomenon (Fujita 1995a; Fujita 1995b, Kohn and Gomes– Casseres 1997, Khon 1997). Data show that this process of international growth is significantly taking place in Italy, where local SMEs have expanded their presence not only through the traditional means of exports but also through the establishment of foreign direct investments (Mutinelli and Piscitello 1998). The analysis of the strategies of internationalisation realised by the SMEs is extremely important for an economy such as the Italian one, where the industrial structure is mainly based on small firms. However, the average small size of firms is not the only feature of Italian firms, which show a high level of geographical concentration in areas generally defined as “industrial districts”. Economic literature on the industrial districts dates back to the work of Marshall, but it is with special regard to the Italian experience that a large of number of works have been devoted (Porter 1990, 1998, Lorenzoni and Lazerson 1999, Baccarani and Golinelli 1993). This widespread interest on this aspect is mainly due to the capacity that firms, operating within the industrial districts, have demonstrated in entering international markets and in the role they have in developing employment. The importance of districts within the Italian economy can be inferred by an analysis of some synthetic indicators: the Istat's (Italian Central Statistics Institute) 1991 census singled out some 200 industrial districts in which over 2 million workers are employed, a figure equivalent to 42.5% of overall factory employment in Italy. Export data, regarding these local systems, are even more significant. Recent data on 60 major Italian districts, has emphasised that, in 1996, 30.5% of
Paper presented at the Asac-Ifsam joint conference, 8-11 July, 2000, Montreal, Canada Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, Facoltà di Economia, via Ravasi, 2 – 21100 Varese; E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
the total exports for Italian corporations was accounted for by corporations operating in one of the 60 major districts. Therefore the importance of district-based companies is obvious in terms of foreign market penetration skills.
The majority of Italian industrial districts are to be found in sectors with a standard technology that produce final consumer goods. These sectors are generally positioned in the maturity phase of the product's life cycle and are, therefore, growth-restricted and with a high price elasticity. Consequently, Italian corporations operating in these sectors are heavily exposed to international competition and, in particular, to competition by companies belonging to developing areas with low labour costs. Many scholars, looking at the Italian experience, have forecasted that the coming of globalisation would have forced the myriad of small districtbased firms to merge into a few large enterprises. Against this changing scenario, which occurred during the second half of the Eighties and the Nineties, the solutions found by Italian districts once again confirmed their great capacity for adapting to the new environment (Sabel, 1996). This implied in-depth reorganisation and the search for new forms of organisation, both at the local and international levels. The increasingly stiff price competition in the newlyindustrialised countries compelled district-based companies to change their strategies, by no longer wagering on cost leadership, but on product differentiation. An additional solution was the development of technological innovation in terms of marketing and distribution and production decentralisation on an international level. Concerning the latter development, aggregate data show that these kinds of strategies are increasingly being pursued by Italian SMEs (ISTAT 1996, Varaldo and Ferrucci, 1997).
Whereas a large amount of work has been devoted to the strategies of companies acting within industrial districts - their international marketing strategies in particular - very few works have considered the internationalisation production strategies realised by SMEs in general, and those operating in industrial districts in particular. We have tried to analyse the process of internationalisation that is taking place. With this goal in m we have analysed the Italian ind investments in Romania, this area being a typical target of the investments by Italian SMEs (Manea and Pearce 1999). More precisely, we have concentrated our attention on the Italian presence in the northwest area of the country (county of Arad and Timis), where, according to official data, there is the highest concentration of Italian investments by small and medium-sized firms mainly coming from the Veneto region, an area within Italy characterised by a high density of industrial districts.
This paper tries to address the following questions: Are the firms acting within the Italian framework of industrial districts following some peculiar path of internationalisation? Secondly, is the geographical concentration of their nvestment a sign that the operational i relationships developed within the local network of firms have been expanded even to other geographical contexts?
Finally, we have tried to see how the firms we studied have succeeded in overcoming the classical limits to growth that SMEs face, and that have been identified in the management literature as the scarcity of financial and managerial resources.
The work has been organised in the following way. The first part describes the methodology that has been followed in the research. The second section describes the principal findings of the empirical research, followed in the third part by a discussion of the main results.
The research followed a case studies approach (Eisenhardt 1989; Yin 1994). In February, 1998, data on Italian firms in the northwestern part of Romania were collected by the local Chambers of Commerce. From the lists of the 482 firms operating in the area, a group of 22 companies that are part of a local network and with links to Italian industrial districts have been selected. The dimension of the sample have been chosen in order to allow an in-depth analysis of cases.The link has been defined in quite a broad way, ranging from cases where the Romanian company is a subsidiary of an Italian corporation located in an industrial district to those of firms with relevant participations of Italian capital and with some kind of agreement with Italian partners located in an Italian industrial district. In order to catch one of the main industrial cluster characteristics the definition of agreement has been taken according to the definition offered by Blankenburg Holm, Eriksonn and Johanson (1999), who define business relations within networks as those:
“ relationships between suppliers and customers imply(ing) that the two exchange partners coordinate a number of exchange and production activities in a way that increase their interdependence, thereby raising the joint productivity and creating relationship value”
Once the sample has been defined, interviews with managers of the Italian counterpart were conducted in Italy. The interviews allowed us to test a questionnaire that was consequently sent to the 22 firms in Romania at the end of 1998. In July, 1999, direct interviews were done with the representatives of the firms located in Romania or, where existing, with the local country mangers. When available, all the data collected in the interviews have been checked with company reports and with all the official information available. Within the 22 firms 8 are companies with Italian capital and with an agreement with firms still located in Italy, while 14 are subsidiaries of Italian firms. Concerning the sector of activity, 5 firms are producers of taps, household appliances and handle manufacturers, 3 are active in the marblegranite working sector, 8 in textile and clothing, and 6 in the footwear industry.
The process of delocalisation of activities directed toward countries such as Romania has been generally interpreted as the result of strategies aimed just at looking for low cost labour. Our research tends to confirm this result, but in addition it casts some light on the importance of the relationship developed within the starting district in order to fully understand the strategies followed by the firms acting within the framework of the district. The Italian presence in Romania is mainly distinguished by small and medium-sized corporations. Big Italian corporations are only marginally present. This tendency for small and medium-sized corporations to be in Romania implies relatively scanty resort to market penetration methods performed through the take-over of local corporations. Our analysis has identified three different organisational strategies followed by the SMEs.
One strategy can be defined as a sort of “transnational district”. According to this model, which from some points of view resembles the one defined by Lorenzoni and Baden Fuller (1995), firms develop an international presence through their ability to co-ordinate an international network of partners. The difference between the Lorenzoni and Baden Fuller model and ours is that in our case the network is co-ordinated in the centre by an SME which is mainly domestic and not by a large multinational company, as i the cases they analyse. n Moreover in our model the network is mainly located within industrial districts both at the local and at the international level. The main characteristic of this kind of firm in our sample is that these companies replicated on an international scale the kind of intense relationships developed within the district. These corporations, that we can call the leader-corporations, have direct access to the target market and have significantly developed marketing and merchandising functions. They are distinguished by a high number of relations with other corporations and have often autonomously started up production internationalisation processes either by transferring plants or, more significantly, encouraging main partners-suppliers to follow a similar route. The firms located at the centre of the network have intense sub-supply relationships with partners located both in the Italian and the Romanian districts. From a purely formal point of view, the central firms have just a market relationship with these partners. The research highlights how these relations are much deeper than appear at first glance. In the companies in question the greater part of production, excepting the higher range, is supplied by outside contracting companies, located in both the local district and other countries, but mainly concentrated in the northeast part of Romania. In this case the companies basically carry out the role of co-ordinator for other corporations, both in and outside the Italian district. Therefore, from a formal viewpoint the relations between the Italian companies, which we can describe as the leader-companies, and the Romanian companies possess all the elements of standard supply relations. In some cases we have observed that these relations are extremely flexible, without resort to the drawing up of contracts. From a material viewpoint, a true partnership with these corporations is feasible. The leader-companies supply technical consulting, by sending their staff on the spot for certain periods of time, including long periods.
They offer a marketing outlet to the partner corporations and can also supply equity and required technology, by way of leasing machinery, using the loan-lease formula. Therefore, relations between the leader-company and the partner corporations reproduce the relations to be found inside the district, on an international level. The leader-company puts suppliers in reciprocal competition both as regards prices and product quality, but this competition takes place within a context of strong collaboration. The leader-companies, in the specific cases examined, enjoy the cost advantages ensuing from the localization of the supplying corporations in Romania, without having to directly commit themselves as regards production internationalisation processes. Moreover, thanks to collaboration relations, the leadercompany is able to guarantee suitable quality standards, as compared to outlet market demand. For their part the partner corporations can, in this way, guarantee a marketing outlet, thanks to the stability of their relations with the leader-company, while securing for themselves the technical consulting offered by the leader-company and making use of the opportunity to obtain human resources.
The international network model: from district to district
The leader company
ITALIAN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT IN ROMANIA
The other two models singled out refer to the case of Italian corporations that have chosen to create brand-new corporations in Romania.
On the one hand, there are 14 corporations which have attempted to tackle decreases in prices enforced by customer corporations by decentralising production in Romania with the main target of curbing costs. This kind of strategy is standardly pursued by corporations operating in the textile-clothing and footwear sectors. In some cases, the privileged relations which are to be found inside a district have been preserved through a company still operating in Italy. The company in Italy has, in general, been assigned the task of undertaking those activities held to be of a strategic nature, such as marketing, business relations management and design and marketing, whereas production is entirely or partially decentralised to Romania. This model of expansion is quite a standard one and has been followed q uite extensively by large corporations. But, compared to the strategies usually observed where relocalisation processes are being implemented (Dunning, 1993), this strategy stands out insofar as the firms involved are SMEs which seem to move towards areas where the existence of others companies allow for some of the typical processes implemented within the industrial districts to be replicated.
On the other hand, there are corporations which have entirely transferred all the value chain to Romania. These companies have been typically located in a marginal situation within the framework of districts of origin. Once again, the SME corporations have shown a tendency to replicate in Romania the district logic and behaviour as achieved in Italy. These corporations, whose reference market was mainly the Italian district, are distinguished by a restricted number of relations with other corporations, and they mainly depend on the leadercorporations we have described above. These corporations, so as to avoid being cut off from the market by other corporations outside the district, have relocated in Romania. However, among these corporations some have seized this opportunity for internationalisation to achieve a strategic expansion, by acquiring a more autonomous role as regards the corporations in their district of origin. These firms maintained their strategic links with the “central” partners in the Italian districts, but they were also able to become a reference point for a series of other corporations in Romania. In so doing they perform the role of leader-company in their new target district, a role they were unable to perform in their district of origin, by diversifying production, increasing the number of clients and reference markets, or directly penetrating target markets with autonomous trademarks, thus expanding merchandising and marketing strategies.
Finally it is worth noting that, contrary to the traditional wisdom that states that small firms expand internationally mainly thanks to some local partner's help, no joint-ventures with local partners have been found in the sample analysed.
According to Gomes-Casseres (1997, p. 36) small and medium-sized firms can be divided in two groups with regard to their internationalisation strategies: “The first type of firm relies on its own capabilities to exploit market niches; the second tries to succeed in a larger market by using alliances to reach the required scale and scope”. The idea is that unless a company is a leader within a narrow market segment, small firms have to rely on external support, i.e. alliances, in order to expand internationally.
In the cases we analyse no firms were really market leaders. The companies in the sample seem to follow the classical model of international expansion as defined by the international product cycle (Vernon 1966 and 1979). According to this model firms operating in mature sectors expand their production abroad in order to keep up with the low-cost competition from foreign producers. The choice of the entry mode in our sample seems to depend mainly on the position of the firms within the constellation developed in the original industrial districts. In the cases of firms in the centre of the network, internationalisation is mainly realised through the investments undertaken by suppliers; in all other cases, through direct investments. The more relevant aspect of this strategy is that even in the case of internationalisation through suppliers the process of expansion remains largely within the original network. Firms in the districts do not outsource transactions outside what we can call the “soft-hierarchy” of the network, realising a sort of internalisation within the constellation and not within the firms.
According to the theory of internalisation (Buckley and Casson 1991; Casson, 1992; Hennart 1991) internationalisation is realised through foreign direct investment when the firms have some advantage that is not worth selling to the market i.e. when the hierarchy is more convenient then the market. In our cases firms in the sample avoid selling their technology because the competitive advantage they possess is the result of long-term supply relationships established with other firms acting within the framework of the Italian district. These kinds of relationships are a form of co-operation characterised by a high level of adaptability of production by the seller to the request of clients, by the common sharing of technology, and by the development of joint-decision making arrangements. These links are part of the real competitive advantage of the firms, an advantage that cannot be outsourced to other producers. Consequently, the firms tend to use direct investment as the main tool for internationalisation while avoiding co-operation with local partners. This path of expansion is realised either directly by the firms or, in the case of companies at the centre of the network, by supporting sub-suppliers in order to produce abroad.
The relationships developed in the source districts help us to understand why the internationalisation strategies are focused on a restricted area. Management literature has clearly shown how the main limit to the international expansion of small firms is the shortage of managerial skills. (Buckley and al.1997). Within small firms decision-making is often personalised and relies on personal perception, therefore it is likely that (Aharoni, 1966) the decision to go international and the management of international operations rely on decisions taken without a proper evaluation of the alternatives. In this context the personal relations developed within the Italian districts with managers of suppliers, clients and competitors strongly influence these kinds of decisions. When the first-mover firms within the districts moved towards Romania, other companies followed within the network and in the other competitor networks (Knickerbocker, 1973). Moreover, if we take into account information costs, SMEs are at a disadvantage compared to large firms also regarding their capabilities in collecting information on the new business environment (Cafferata and Mensi 1995). This situation increases the uncertainty surrounding the investments. Since for small firms the proportion of resources committed to a foreign direct investment is quite large, the risk also seems larger for SMEs then for big firms (Caves 1982). The concentration of firms in a restricted area helps firms to save on search costs and decrease the uncertainty surrounding the investments. Finally, to go abroad requires adaptation and modification in terms of management, organisational routines and even of marketing and production technologies. All these modifications involve costs to the firms which would be hard to absorb given their limited resources.
The path of expansion shown in our sample seems to indicate that the Italian firms minimise these problems of risk and uncertainty through a model involving the common sharing of information through the network that made up the districts and through a step-by-step process of internationalisation. From this point of view, the results of the empirical research seem to confirm some of the main findings of the network theory concerning internationalisation (Håkansson, 1982, Johanson e Vahlne 1977, 1990, Bjorkmann e Forsgren 1997).
The process of international expansion in the cases we have analysed seems to be a cumulative process. An international presence – according to the model (Johanson and Mattsson 1988) is the result of increasing market knowledge and consequent market commitment. According to this theory, the first approach to the international market is through exports, therefore investments follow (Peterse and Pedersen, 1997). In our case investments and commitment to the foreign market are resource seeking, therefore exports are not the first means of acquiring knowledge of the new environment. This knowledge is gained through the diffusion of the information not only within the firms but within the network of companies that have initially been formed within the original districts. In our case international expansion has been realised not only through the classical instrument of foreign direct investment but also through partnership co-operation and sub-supply agreements. In this respect, the network approach seems best suited to evaluate this process. Internationalisation must be interpreted as
a process that regards not only one firm but the entire web of firms. The international experience and the advantages of part of the network is then passed to the entire constellation and from constellation to constellation. The stability that characterised the relationship within networks help the diffusion of information within the constellation. Geographical proximity at source became, in this respect, an important point. Proximity not only reinforces the relationship among firms, thus facilitating the exchange of information, but also contributes to the spread of imitation processes among the firms, and consequently to replicating a concentration of firms in the Romanian area. In analyzing the internal process of decision making that convinces the firms to go international, all the firms affirmed that an important factor was the existence of other partners or competitors from the same district following the same route.
Aharoni Y. (1966), The foreign investment decision process, Harvard University Press, Boston Baccarani C. and Golinelli G. (1993), “Tratti del divenire dei distretti industriali”, Il Quaderno dell’Istituto Tagliacarne, n. 8; pp. 15 – 46 Bjorkmann I. e Forsgren M. (1997), The nature of the international firm. Nordic contribution to international business research, Munksgaard International Publisher, Copenhagen Blankenburg Holm D., Eriksonn K. and Johanson J. (1999), “Creating value through mutual commitment to the business network relationship”, Strategic Management Journal, n. 20, pp. 467-486 Buckley P.J. and al. (eds.) (1997), International technology transfer by small and medium sized enterprises, London MacMillan Buckley P. J. e Casson M. (1991), The future of the multinational enterprise, MacMillan, London Cafferata and Mensi (1995), “The role of information in the internationalisation of SMEs: a typological approach”, International Small Business Journal, vol. 13 no. 3, pp. 35-46 Casson M. (1992), “Internalization theory and beyond” New directions in international business. Research priorities for the 1990s, ed. by P.J. Buckley, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, pp. 4 - 27
Caves E.R. (1982a), Multinational enterprise and economic analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA Dunning J. (1993), The globalization of business, Routledge, London and New York Eisenhardt K. M. (1989), “Building theories from case studies research”, Academy of management Review, 14 (4), pp. 532-550 Fujita M. (1995a), “Small and medium-sized transnational corporations: trends and patterns of foreign direct investment”, Small Business Economics, n.3, Vol. 7, pp. 183 - 204 ----- (1995b), “Small and medium-sized transnational corporations: salient features”, Small Business Economics, n.4, Vol. 7, pp. 251 - 271 Håkansson H. (1982), International marketing and the purchasing of goods. An interaction approach, John Wiley, Chichester Hennart J.F. (1991), “The transaction cost theory of the multinational enterprise”, The nature of the transnational firm, C. N. Pitelis e R. Sugden, eds., Routledge, London and New York, pp. 81 - 116 Johanson J. and Mattsson L.G. (1988), “Internationalisation in industrial systems. A network approach”, Strategies in Global Competition, Ed. by N. Hood e J.E. Vahlne, pp. 287 – 314 Johanson J. and Vahlne J.E. (1977), “The internationalisation process of the firm. A model of knowledge development and increasing market commitment”, Journal of International Business, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 23 – 32 ------ (1990), “The mechanism of internationalisation”, International Marketing Review, vol. 7 no. 4, pp. 11- 24 Knickerbocker F. T. (1973), Oligopolistic reaction and the multinational enterprise, Harvard University Press, Boston Kohn T.O. (1997), “Small firm as international players”, Small Business Economics, n.1, Vol. 9, pp. 45- 51 Kohn T. O. and Gomes Cassares B.(1997), “Small firms in international competition: a challenge to traditional theory?” P.J. Buckley et al. (eds.), International technology transfer by small and medium sized enterprise. Country studies, London, MacMillan Kogut B. e Singh H. (1988), “The effect of national culture on the choice of entry model”, Journal of international business studies, Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 305 – 322
ISTAT (1996), Rapporto annuale. La situazione del Paese nel 1995, Istat, Roma Lorenzoni G. Lazerson M. H. (1999), “The firms that feed industrial district a return to the Italian source”, Industrial and corporate change, June , Vol. 8 n. 2, pp 235-266 Lorenzoni G. e Baden-Fuller C. (1995), “Creating a strategic center to manage a web of partners”, California Mangement Review, Vol. 37, n. 3, Spring, pp. 146 - 163 Manea J. and Pearce R. (1999), Transnational corporation strategies in industrial transition: the case of Romania, Discussion papers in international investment & management, The University of Reading, Reading Mutinelli M. e Piscitello L. (1998), “FDI strategies by Smes: evidence from the Italian case”, Proceedings of the 23rd annual EIBA Conference, Stuttgart, December 14-16, 1997, pp.251-280 Petersen B. and Pedersen T. (1997), “Twenty years after. Support and critique of the Uppsala internationalisation model”, Bjorkmann I. and Forsgren M. (1997), The nature of the international firm. Nordic contribution to international business research, Munksgaard International Publisher, Copenhagen, pp. 117 - 133 Porter M. E. (1990), The competitive advantage of the nations, Macmillan Press, Basingstoke ------ (1998). “Clusters and the new economics of competition”, Harvard Business Review, Nov-Dec, pp. 77-90 Sabel C. (1996), Learning-by-monitoring: the dilemmas of regional economic policy in Europe, in: network of enterprises and local development, OECD, Paris, pp. 23 - 51 Varaldo R. e Ferrucci L. (edited by) (1997), Il distretto industriale tra logiche di impresa e logiche di sistema, F.Angeli, Milano Vernon R. (1966), “International investment and international trade in the product cycle”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 80, 1966, pp. 190-207 ---- (1979), “The product cycle hypothesis in a new international environment”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, n. 4, pp. 255 - 267 Yin R. K. (1994), Case study research. Design and methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue listening from where you left off, or restart the preview.