11054 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.
47 / Monday, March 12, 2007 / Notices
KANSAS
Crawford County
Raymond Community Home, 301 Osage St.,
Girard, 07000255
Doniphan County
Highland Christian Church, (Highland,
Doniphan County, Kansas MPS), 102 E.
Main St., Highland, 07000250
Highland Presbyterian Church, (Highland,
Doniphan County, Kansas MPS), 101 South
Ave., Highland, 07000248
Highland Water Tower, (Highland, Doniphan
County, Kansas MPS), Jct. N. Genesee and
W. Illinois Sts., Highland, 07000249
Wynkoop, A.L., House, (Highland, Doniphan
County, Kansas MPS), 307 West
Pennsylvania, Highland, 07000251
Sedgwick County
Johnson Drug Store Building, 2329 E. Central,
Wichita, 07000254
Keep Klean Building, 810 E. Third, Wichita,
07000252
Stoner Apartment Building, 938–940 North
Market, Wichita, 07000253
OKLAHOMA
Coal County
Keel Creek Bridge, OK 31 over Keel Creek,
Coalgate, 07000257
Jackson County
Perryman Ranch Headquarters, 0.2 mi. E. of
jct. of Cty. Rds. N193 and E159, Duke,
07000260
Oklahoma County
Douglass High School, Old, 600 N. High
Ave., Oklahoma City, 07000259
Pontotoc County
Meaders, F.W., House, 521 South Broadway,
Ada, 07000258
OREGON
Multnomah County
Baruh—Zell House, 3131 SE Talbot Rd.,
Portland, 07000256
Goldsmith, Alan and Barbara, House, 4140
SW Greenleaf Court, Portland, 07000261
Lane—Miles Standish Company Printing
Plant, 1539 NW 19th Ave., Portland,
07000262
Wilson—Chambers Mortuary, 430 N.
Killingsworth St., Portland, 07000263
RHODE ISLAND
Providence County
Earnscliffe Woolen—Paragon Worsted
Company Mill Complex, 25 and 39 Manton
Ave., Providence, 07000265
Howard, Ebenezer, House, 1264 Round Top
Rd., Burrillville, 07000264
TEXAS
Bee County
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Beeville Post Office, 111 N. St. Mary’s St.,
Beeville, 07000272
Cooke County
Nelson Farmstead, 7729 FM 678, Gainesville,
07000270
VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:04 Mar 09, 2007 Jkt 211001
Johnson County
Smith Ranch, FM 916, 1 mi. W of TX 174,
Rio Vista, 07000271
San Augustine County
San Augustine Commercial Historic District,
Roughly bounded by Main St.,
Montgomery St., Congress St., Broadway,
Columbia St., property lines and Golden
Way, San Augustine, 07000269
Tarrant County
Kress Building, 604 Main St., Fort Worth,
07000266
VIRGINIA
Goochland County
Tinsley Tavern, 2791 Elk Island Rd.,
Columbia, 07000276
Isle Of Wight County
Ivy Hill Cemetery, W. of N. Church St.,
Smithfield, 07000275
Loudoun County
Purcellville Historic District, Roughly
bounded by W&OD Trail, S. 32nd St., W.
F and E. G Sts., and Maple Ave.,
Purcellville, 07000277
Louisa County
Boxley Place, 103 Ellisville Dr., Louisa,
07000273
Norfolk Independent City
Zion Methodist Church, 2729 Bowden’s
Ferry Rd., Norfolk (Independent City),
07000274.
[FR Doc. E7–4317 Filed 3–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–51–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Agency Information Collection
Activities Under OMB Review;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice and Request for
Comments.
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice
announces the following Information
Collection Request (ICR) has been
forwarded to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval: Recreation Survey, New
Melones Lake Project, Sonora, CA. The
ICR describes the nature of the
information collection and its expected
cost and hour burden.
DATES: OMB has up to 60 days to
approve or disapprove this information
collection, but may respond after 30
days; therefore, public comment must
be received on or before April 11, 2007.
PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
ADDRESSES: Please send your comments
to the Desk Officer for the Department
of the Interior at the Office of
Management and Budget, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, via
facsimile to (202) 395–6566 or e-mail to
OIRA_DOCKET@omb.eop.gov. A copy
of your comments should also be
directed to the Bureau of Reclamation,
Attention: E. Vasquez, CC 419, 7794
Folsom Dam Road, Folsom, CA 95630,
or directed via e-mail to
evasquez@mp.usbr.gov. Please reference
OMB No. 1006–NEW in your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information or a copy of the
proposed forms contact Ms. Elizabeth
Vasquez at the above address, or at (916)
989–7192.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title:
Recreation Survey, New Melones Lake
Project, Sonora, CA.
Abstract: The purpose of the on-site
recreation survey is to characterize
existing users, characterize their use of
the New Melones Project, assess their
satisfaction with their experience and
the facilities, and find out what other
opportunities or facilities they would
like to see developed at the New
Melones Lake Project. The purpose of
the regional telephone survey is to
characterize regional population, their
outdoor recreation use, the demand for
various types of outdoor recreation
activities, trends in outdoor recreation
use, and the extent to which the
regional population uses New Melones
Lake Project, Sonora, CA. The on-site
survey and the regional telephone
survey shall describe the recreational
preferences of visitors to the New
Melones Lake Project and provide
guidance on what recreational planning
objectives should be included in the
New Melones Lake Project RMP/EIS.
OMB No. 1006–NEW
Frequency: One-time voluntary
survey.
Respondents for On-site Survey:
Persons who recreate at New Melones
Lake Project.
Respondents for Telephone Survey:
Residents of Sonora and Tuolumne
counties.
Estimated Total Number of
Respondents: 1,750.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 438 hours.
Estimate of Burden for Each Form:
12MRN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 47 / Monday, March 12, 2007 / Notices 11055

Burden Annual burden

estimate per Number of re- on
Form form spondents respondents
(in minutes) (in hours)

On-site survey .............................................................................................................................. 15 1,250 313

Telephone survey ........................................................................................................................ 15 500 125
Total ...................................................................................................................................... ........................ 1,750 438

Comments DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE chemical products. Id. at 2. The Show

Cause Order further alleged that during
A notice allowing the public a 60-day Drug Enforcement Administration an interview, Respondent stated that he
comment period was published in the had ‘‘little or no background in handling
[Docket No. 05–22]
Federal Register on May 2, 2006 (71 FR list I chemical products.’’ Id. The Show
25857, May 2, 2006). No comments were Planet Trading, Inc., d/b/a/ United Cause Order also alleged that
received in response to the 60-day Wholesale Distributors, Inc.; Denial of Respondent told the investigators that
comment period. The Public now has a Application he intended to sell list I products that
second chance to comment. were marketed in bottles and not blister
On February 15, 2005, the Deputy packs because the latter ‘‘were not good
Comments are Invited on Assistant Administrator, Office of sellers.’’ Id.
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement The Show Cause Order also alleged
(a) Whether the proposed collection of
Administration, issued an Order to that Respondent intended to store the
information is necessary for the proper
Show Cause to Planet Trading, Inc., list I products in a warehouse ‘‘with all
performance of our functions, including (Respondent) of Orlando, Florida. The
whether the information will have other items [and] without any additional
Show Cause Order proposed to deny security installed.’’ Id. at 3. The Show
practical use; Respondent’s pending application for a Cause Order further alleged that
(b) the accuracy of our burden DEA Certificate of Registration as a ‘‘[b]ecause [Respondent’s] customers are
estimate for the proposed collection of distributor of the list I chemicals allowed to serve themselves from the
information, including the validity of ephedrine and pseudoephedrine on the warehouse shelves, all customers will
the methodology and assumptions used; ground that Respondent’s registration have unescorted access to the list I
(c) ways to enhance the quality, would be inconsistent with the public chemicals stored in the warehouse.’’ Id.
usefulness, and clarity of the interest. Show Cause Order at 1, see Finally, the Show Cause Order alleged
also 21 U.S.C. 823(h). that Respondent’s ‘‘proposed sales of
information to be collected; and
More specifically, the Show Cause combination ephedrine and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of Order alleged that both ephedrine and pseudoephedrine products are
the collection of information on pseudoephedrine are ‘‘commonly used inconsistent with the known legitimate
respondents. to illegally manufacture market and known end-user demand for
An agency may not conduct or methamphetamine, a Schedule II products of this type,’’ and thus
sponsor, and a person is not required to controlled substance.’’ Show Cause Respondent ‘‘would be serving an
respond to, a collection of information Order at 1. The Show Cause Order illegitimate market for [these]
unless it displays a currently valid OMB alleged that ‘‘DEA knows by product[s].’’ Id. The Show Cause Order
control number. Reclamation will experience’’ that a ‘‘gray market’’ exists concluded by alleging that because
display a valid OMB control number on ‘‘in which certain pseudoephedrine and Respondent’s owner had ‘‘no experience
the survey forms. ephedrine products are distributed only handling list I chemicals’’ and its
to convenience stores and gas stations, warehouse has ‘‘insufficient security,’’
Before including your address, phone from where they have a high incidence its ‘‘registration would likely lead to
number, e-mail address, or other of diversion’’ into the illicit increased diversion of list I chemicals.’’
personal identifying information in your manufacture of methamphetamine. Id. Id.
comment, you should be aware that at 2. Relatedly, the Show Cause Order Respondent, through its owner Mr.
your entire comment—including your alleged that only ‘‘[a] very small Vihang Patel, requested a hearing. The
personal identifying information—may percentage’’ of legitimate sales of list I case was assigned to Administrative
be made publicly available at any time. chemical products occur in gray market Law Judge (ALJ) Mary Ellen Bittner,
While you can ask us in your comment retailers and that the average gray who conducted a hearing in Tampa,
to withhold your personal identifying market retailer ‘‘could expect to sell Florida, on November 1, 2005. At the
information from public review, we * * * only about $10.00 to $30.00 hearing, both parties put on witnesses
cannot guarantee that we will be able to worth of pseudoephedrine products’’ a and introduced documentary evidence.
do so. month. Id. at 3. The Show Cause Order Following the hearing, the Government
also alleged that the expected sales for submitted proposed findings of fact and
Michael R. Finnegan, combination ephedrine products are conclusions of law.
Area Manager, Central California Area Office, ‘‘only one-fourth of’’ this amount. Id. On April 25, 2006, the Administrative
Mid-Pacific Region. The Show Cause Order alleged that Law Judge submitted her decision
[FR Doc. E7–4406 Filed 3–9–07; 8:45 am] during a pre-registration investigation, which recommended that Respondent’s
Respondent’s president advised DEA application be denied. Neither party
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES

BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P

investigators that his firm distributes filed exceptions. The record was then
sundry items and tobacco products to forwarded to me for final agency action.
convenience stores, gas stations, and Having considered the record as a
small independent groceries, which whole, I hereby issue this decision and
constitute the gray market for list I final order. I adopt the ALJ’s decision in

VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:04 Mar 09, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM 12MRN1