You are on page 1of 5

Chapter IV

RESULT AND DISCUSSION


Table 1
Perceptions of the Respondents on the existing Ordering of Alanys Ornamental Plants in terms of
Performance
Description
1. Time consumed in computing the sales
2. Difficulty in checking the availability of the
3.
4.
5.
6.

stocks
Availability of the manager
Under graduate laborers
Punctuality
Delayed transactions
GRAND MEAN

INTERPRETATIO

3.3
3.41

N
Uncertain
Agree

3.53
3.29
3.27
3.64
3.40

Agree
Uncertain
Uncertain
Agree
Agree

The Table shows the Perceptions of the Respondents on the existing Ordering of Alanys
Ornamental Plants in terms of Performance. It shows that most of the respondents are
Uncertain that Time consumed in computing the sales having an average mean of 3.3. It also
shows that most of the respondents are Agree having a mean of 3.64 on Delayed
transactions. It shows that the respondents perceived that the existing services of the Alanys
Garden in terms of Performance is Agree having a grand mean of 3.406. Because the
information requested by the customers are not delivered accordingly.

Table 2
Perceptions of the Respondents on the existing Ordering of Alanys Ornamental Plants in terms of
Information
26

Description
1.
2.
3.
4.

Unable to produce quality products


Quality of work is just fair
Unfair in treating the customers
Lack of marketing
GRAND MEAN

INTERPRETATIO

3.48
3.31
3.39
3.38
3.38

N
Agree
Uncertain
Uncertain
Uncertain
Uncertain

The Table shows the Perceptions of the Respondents on the existing Ordering of Alanys
Ornamental Plants in terms of Information. It shows that most of the respondents are Agree
that they are Unable to produce quality products having an average mean of 3.48. It also shows
that most of the respondents are Uncertain having a mean of 3.39 on Unfair in treating the
customers. It shows that the respondents perceived that the existing services of the Alanys
Garden in terms of Information is Uncertain having a grand mean of 3.382.588. Meanwhile,
there is no existing functional database of Alanys Garden.

Table 3
Perceptions of the Respondents on the existing Ordering of Alanys Ornamental Plants in terms of
Cost and Security

27

Description
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Uncontrolled in giving receipts


No permanent in charge in selling
Underestimating the cost of contract projects
Delayed Payments
Verbal transactions
WEIGHTED AVERAGE MEAN

INTERPRETATIO

3.62
3.5
3.54
3.4
3.28
3.46

N
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Uncertain
Agree

The Table shows the Perceptions of the Respondents on the existing Ordering of Alanys
Ornamental Plants in terms of Cost and Security. It shows that most of the respondents are
Agree that they are Uncontrolled in giving receipts having an average mean of 3.62. It also
shows that most of the respondents are Uncertain having a mean of 3.28 on Verbal
transaction. Furthermore, the respondents perceived that the existing services of the Alanys
Garden in terms of Cost and Security is Agree having a grand mean of 3.468. There is no
authorized personnel to managed and accessed the Information of the Alanys Garden.

Table 4
Perceptions of the Respondents on the existing Ordering of Alanys Ornamental Plants in terms of
Efficiency
Description

INTERPRETATION

28

1. Unknowledgeable workers/laborers

3.34

Uncertain

2. Landscape artist concept is strictly followed

3.5

Agree

3. First come first is strictly observed

3.22

Uncertain

3.353

Uncertain

GRAND MEAN

The Table shows the Perceptions of the Respondents on the existing Ordering of Alanys
Ornamental Plants in terms of Efficiency. It shows that most of the respondents are Uncertain
that there are Unknowledgeable workers/laborers having an average mean of 3.34. It also
shows that most of the respondents are Agree having a mean of 3.5 on Landscape artist
concepts is strictly observed. It shows that the respondents perceived that the existing services
of the Alanys Garden in terms of Efficiency is Uncertain having a grand mean of 3.353.
However, the existing service can be improved by making a website.

Table 5
SUMMARY OF RESPONDENTS PERCEPTION
SYSTEM EVALUATION
Performance

WEIGHTED
MEAN
3.406

INTERPRETATION
Agree
29

Information
Control and Security
Efficiency
GRAND AVERAGE MEAN

3.38
3.468
3.353
3.402

Uncertain
Agree
Uncertain
Agree

The table shows the summary of respondents perception. The highest among the criteria
is the Control and Security with a weighted mean of 3.468 interpreted as Agree and the lowest
among the criteria is the Efficiency with a weighted mean of 3.353 interpreted as Uncertain
and the weighted average mean of all the criteria is 3.402 and it was interpreted as Agree.

30